I dedicated this thread to Max_Dawg

Nzinga

Lover of Africa
BGOL Investor
FAA orders 'urgent' engine fixes for Boeing 787 Dreamliners

1OSVbm-2OMi-570x320.jpg



(CNN)Describing it as an "urgent safety issue," the Federal Aviation Administration has ordered modifications on specific General Electric engines on some 787 Dreamliners because an icing problem could force those engines to shut down in flight.

Friday's FAA airworthiness directive stems from a January 29 incident aboard a 787 flying at about 20,000 feet.
"Ice shed from the fan blades ... causing the blades to rub against the fan case, resulting in engine vibration," GE Aviation spokesman Rick Kennedy told CNN. That forced an engine shut down and the aircraft landed safely with its remaining engine.
According to the FAA document, "Susceptibility to heavy fan blade rubs, if not corrected, could result in engine damage and a possible in-flight non-restartable power loss of one or both engines."
"The potential for common cause failure of both engines in flight is an urgent safety issue," the FAA document said.
Read the FAA airworthiness directive
The Dreamliner is Boeing's most sophisticated passenger plane to date, made largely of expensive, super-strong light-weight carbon-fiber reinforced plastic instead of traditional aluminum. Its fuel efficiency and long-range has gained it a reputation for opening new airline routes worldwide.
"In some cases, airplanes could be grounded," the FAA directive said. But GE said it was"working with operators to avoid airline disruption," Kennedy said. "The process takes about 16 hours using a fan grinding machine. All of the work is done on-wing with no engine removals."
The specific engine type is the GEnx-1B PIP2. The order affects about 176 Dreamliners at 29 airlines worldwide, the FAA document said.
The FAA mandate covers 43 U.S. Dreamliners in the U.S. But because most other nations follow the FAA's lead, other nations are expected to follow suit.
Boeing and GE have jointly investigated this issue and worked with the FAA on a plan to fully resolve it, Boeing said Friday. GE recommended corrective action to operators on April 1. The mandated work is already well under way, Boeing said, with more than 40 Dreamliner engine reworks completed, so far. The FAA airworthiness directive requires the airlines to perform GE's recommendations within 150 days.
For pilots who are flying 787s that haven't undergone the rework yet, the FAA has ordered an in-flight ice removal procedure.
Whenever pilots suspect ice buildup above 12,500 feet — or when the indicator light confirms it — pilots are advised to rev each engine at 85% of full throttle every five minutes.
FAA airworthiness directives are not uncommon. They're issued as part of a longstanding rule making and safety process between aircraft manufacturers, operators and regulators.
 
Why? Is he the guy that is going have to fix all them planes? :confused:
I want to point out to him that engineering is not a perfect science.
Errors will happen. He stated with complete confidence that the
technology in American planes had been tested and vetted, and
that error was almost impossible in the design
 
I want to point out to him that engineering is not a perfect science.
Errors will happen. He stated with complete confidence that the
technology in American planes had been tested and vetted, and
that error was almost impossible in the design
Well he is right, because don't major airlines have like a 99.998% success record... I guess staying on top of all possible errors ahead of time is the reason why their track record is so great..
 
Well he is right, because don't major airlines have like a 99.998% success record... I guess staying on top of all possible errors ahead of time is the reason why their track record is so great..
He averred that Chinese engineering alone was susceptible of error...
 
I want to point out to him that engineering is not a perfect science.
Errors will happen. He stated with complete confidence that the
technology in American planes had been tested and vetted, and
that error was almost impossible in the design
Is that back when you were lying about that bridge?
 
Is that back when you were lying about that bridge?
I posted many American bridge failures, which was not the point. You on the other
hand are an ignoramus who knows nothing about the Gaussian distribution of outcomes
 
Back
Top