I asked AI how is medicaid a disincentivizer for work and how do you solve that problem? Here's what it said...

[geechiedan]

Medicaid, while a crucial safety net, can sometimes create disincentives for work due to its eligibility rules and the "benefits cliff" phenomenon.

How Medicaid Can Disincentivize Work:​

• The "Benefits Cliff": This is the primary issue. Medicaid eligibility is tied to income thresholds. If an individual or family earns even a small amount over the limit, they can lose all of their Medicaid benefits, including essential health coverage, child care assistance, and other supports. This sudden loss of benefits can effectively cancel out or even exceed the gains from increased earnings, making it financially illogical for someone to pursue higher-paying jobs or work more hours.
  
  
  
  
• Asset Limits: In some cases, Medicaid has asset limits in addition to income limits. This can discourage saving and building wealth, as accumulating too many assets could lead to a loss of eligibility.
• Complexity and Administrative Burden: The process of applying for and maintaining Medicaid can be complex, requiring significant paperwork and reporting. For individuals with unstable work, fluctuating incomes, or limited access to resources, this administrative burden can make it difficult to navigate the system and maintain coverage, even if they are eligible.
• Fear of Losing Coverage: Many individuals rely heavily on Medicaid for essential health services, especially those with chronic conditions or disabilities. The fear of losing this critical coverage can be a powerful deterrent to seeking employment or increasing hours, even if it means staying in a lower-income bracket.
  
  
  
  
  
• Work Requirements (in some states): Some states have implemented work requirements for Medicaid eligibility. While proponents argue these encourage employment, critics contend they often create administrative hurdles, leading to eligible individuals losing coverage due to difficulty proving compliance rather than an unwillingness to work. Research suggests these requirements often do not significantly increase employment but do result in a loss of coverage for vulnerable populations.
  
  
  
  

How to Address the Problem:​

Addressing these disincentives requires a multi-faceted approach that balances the need for a safety net with encouraging economic mobility.

1. Smooth out the "Benefits Cliff" with Graduated Phase-Outs:
   
   • Sliding Scale Subsidies: Instead of an abrupt cut-off, gradually reduce Medicaid benefits as income rises. This could involve increasing premium contributions or co-payments on a sliding scale.
   • Extended Eligibility Periods: Allow beneficiaries to maintain coverage for a transitional period even after their income slightly exceeds the traditional threshold, giving them time to adjust and find alternative coverage.
   • Integration with Marketplace Subsidies: Better integrate Medicaid with Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace subsidies. As income rises above Medicaid eligibility, individuals could seamlessly transition to subsidized marketplace plans, ensuring continuous access to affordable health insurance.
2. Increase Income and Asset Thresholds:
   
   • Higher Income Limits: Raise the income eligibility thresholds for Medicaid, particularly in non-expansion states, to align them more closely with the actual cost of living and allow for greater earnings.
   • Relax Asset Limits: Reduce or eliminate asset limits to encourage saving and wealth building without fear of losing benefits.
3. Provide Work Supports and Streamline Administration:
   
   • Medicaid Buy-In Programs for Individuals with Disabilities: These programs allow working individuals with disabilities to purchase Medicaid coverage even with higher earnings, ensuring they don't have to choose between healthcare and work.
     
     
     
     
   • Link to Employment Services: Connect Medicaid beneficiaries with job training, education, and employment support services to help them secure stable, higher-paying jobs. This could involve case management that helps individuals navigate both healthcare and employment resources.
     
     
     
     
   • Simplify Reporting and Enrollment: Reduce the administrative burden by simplifying application processes, allowing for less frequent reporting (e.g., annual instead of monthly), and utilizing technology to make it easier to manage benefits.
   • Address Barriers to Work: Recognize and address common barriers to employment for low-income individuals, such as childcare costs, transportation issues, and lack of digital literacy, which can hinder their ability to meet work requirements or maintain stable employment.
4. Re-evaluate Work Requirements:
   
   • Focus on Support, Not Sanctions: If work requirements are implemented, shift the focus from punitive measures to providing genuine support for employment. This means ensuring robust exemptions for those unable to work (due to disability, caregiving, etc.) and offering meaningful access to job training and placement services.
   • Evidence-Based Approach: Base policy decisions on research that demonstrates the effectiveness of work requirements in increasing employment, rather than simply reducing caseloads.

By addressing the benefits cliff and other disincentives, policymakers can design Medicaid programs that serve as true work supports, helping individuals achieve greater economic stability and well-being without sacrificing essential healthcare coverage.

 

[geechiedan]

 

[Temujin]

We don't complain about giving the military money, we don't complain about giving ICE and border control money. But somehow giving poor people American citizens healthcare is a problem. Everybody in America should have health care everyone. Working not working they should have healthcare.

The system is inefficient because we have millions of people who only go to the emergency room when they are about to die. Guess what they get when they go to the emergency room with no insurance. Temporary medicaid or debt. Guess who pays the temporary medicaid and defaulted hospital debt. We do. Those that are insured do. So if we are paying for it anyway. Why not pay for that same person to go see a pcp.

I have enough empathy even for the bum on the street to not want to see him die if he can't afford a doctor. If we can pay for bombs that supposedly protect everyone than we can pay for healthcare to protect everyone. Fuck we are supposedly the richest country in the world whats with all this broke boy shit.

 

[King Mob]

which ai did you ask?

 

[geechiedan]

which ai did you ask?

gemini.....does another say something different?

 

[geechiedan]

here's ChatGPT's answer:

Medicaid can act as a disincentive to work due to the way eligibility thresholds are structured. Here's a breakdown of the issue and potential solutions:

---

Why Medicaid Can Disincentivize Work​

1. Income Cutoffs
   Medicaid eligibility is typically limited to individuals and families with incomes below a certain percentage of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL)(e.g., 138% FPL in states that expanded Medicaid).
   • If a person earns just a little more than the threshold, they lose Medicaid coverage.
   • This is known as the “benefits cliff.”
2. High Cost of Private Insurance
   Once Medicaid is lost, the alternative—buying insurance on the ACA marketplace or through an employer—can be prohibitively expensive, especially for low-income workers.
   • The net result: working more can make someone worse off financially due to rising healthcare costs.
3. Fear of Instability
   People may avoid promotions, raises, or full-time jobs to stay within Medicaid eligibility because they fear inconsistent access to healthcare if they lose coverage.

---

️ How to Solve the Problem​

Several policy reforms can reduce or eliminate the Medicaid work disincentive:

1. Gradual Phase-Out of Benefits​

• Instead of cutting off Medicaid abruptly at a certain income level, benefits could taper off gradually.
• This reduces the sharp "cliff" effect.
• Some states have tested this through “Medicaid buy-in” programs, letting people pay premiums based on income.

2. Medicaid Buy-In Option​

• Create a public option allowing people over income thresholds to buy into Medicaid at a sliding-scale premium.
• Keeps continuity of care and removes fear of losing coverage.

3. Fix the "Family Glitch"​

• Previously, families with access to “affordable” employer coverage couldn’t get ACA subsidies, even if that plan was unaffordable to dependents.
• This was partially addressed in recent policy changes but full resolution would help align coverage access with income growth.

4. Universal or Automatic Enrollment​

• Some advocate for universal healthcare or automatic enrollment options (e.g. "Medicaid for All" under a certain income) to eliminate means-tested cliffs altogether.
• Alternatively, Medicaid could be auto-renewed with income verification to reduce the administrative burden that also dissuades work.

5. Subsidize Employer Coverage More Generously​

• Provide larger subsidies or tax credits for low-income workers to purchase employer coverage when they exceed Medicaid limits.

---

Summary​

Problem	Solution
Sudden Medicaid loss from small income increases	Gradual benefit phase-outs
Private insurance too expensive	Medicaid buy-in or enhanced subsidies
Fear of instability	Seamless transitions between Medicaid and ACA plans
Administrative burden	Simplified, automatic, or universal coverage

*bolded last line is me

 

[geechiedan]