Hold up, maybe I’m late, or this fake but Hillary had connections to Russians also via hypersonic missiles technology company…..

Mask

"OneOfTheBest"
Platinum Member
* I know it won’t take long for this to be clarified….

but When she was running, I heard a few times, if she won she would go after Russia




Hillary Clinton's Hypersonic Missile Gap

Now at The Daily Caller.

Starting in May 2010, the Washington Examiner reported, drawing on emails obtained by Citizens United, "Clinton Foundation staff pushed Hillary Clinton's State Department to approve a meeting between Bill Clinton and a powerful Russian oligarch as her agency lined up investors for a project under his purview."

His name was Viktor Vekselberg of Renova (a Clinton Foundation donor) and the project under his purview was Skolkovo. The following month, Bill Clinton would receive $500,000 for a speech in Moscow from Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin, a Clinton Foundation donor, a Skolkovo executive, and which talked up Uranium One, whose sale the Clinton State Department would approve, and whose executives together contributed $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

This shocking set of emails the Examiner reported on shows the nexus of Bill and Hillary Clinton's foundation, Hillary Clinton's State Department, Bill Clinton, Russian oligarch Vekselberg, and Skolkovo, "Russia's Silicon Valley," the Putin project to transfer Western technology to Russia that was championed and driven by Mrs. Clinton -- and, what do you know, 17 out of 28 tech companies that hitched up with Skolkovo also contributed to the Clinton Foundation. What a coincidence. Meanwhile, Barack Obama's support for Russian WTO membership made the whole global flow so much easier.

No wonder Herd Media, the Uniparty Congress and FBI Director James Comey never noticed a thing. Oh, except that Putin "hated" Hillary Clinton, "wanted to do her harm," as Comey told Congress this week. Grrr. Maybe hypersonic technology wasn't enough. But I'm getting ahead of the story.

Let's pick up with an Army report on Skolkovo written in 2012, released in 2013, and highlighted by Peter Schweizer in his 2016 report, From Russian with Money, to assess "the implications ... for U.S. policymakers."

Although military activities are not an official cluster of activity, the Skolkovo Foundation has, in fact, been involved in defense-related activities since December 2011, when it approved the first weapons-related project—the development of a hypersonic cruise missile engine. The project is a response to the U.S. Department of Defense’s Advanced Hypersonic Weapon, part of the Prompt Global Strike program.

Fast forward to November 2016, shortly after Donald Trump was elected president when the US Air Force released a report on -- no way -- the Russian and Chinese hypersonic missile threat to the United States.

The United States is vulnerable to future attack by hypersonic missiles from China and Russia and is falling behind in the technology race to develop both defensive and offensive high-speed maneuvering arms, according to a new Air Force study.

"The People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation are already flight-testing high-speed maneuvering weapons (HSMWs) that may endanger both forward deployed U.S. forces and even the continental United States itself," an executive summary of the report says.

"These weapons appear to operate in regimes of speed and altitude, with maneuverability that could frustrate existing missile defense constructs and weapon capabilities."

In a functioning democratic republic, the executive branch decisions and procedures and corruption that led to this defense cataclysm would actually alarm security officials, lawmakers, and even arouse media curiosity, if nothing else. But Skolkovo, the money, the corruption, the treachery, the danger, inspire no reaction at all.

Not even this plain, shocking language, from the Army, circa 2012:

Skolkovo is an ambitious enterprise, aiming to promote technology transfer generally, by inbound direct investment, and occasionally, through selected acquisitions. As such, Skolkovo is arguably an overt alternative to clandestine industrial espionage—with the additional distinction that it can achieve such a transfer on a much larger scale and more efficiently.

Hillary Clinton, her State Department, the Clinton Foundation, Bill Clinton did much to make Skolkovo possible -- did much to activate what was, according to the Army report, "arguably" a massive "clandestine industial espionage" operation. Not that any of this is in the past. This plain-sight-"research"-cum-collusion with the Russian government goes on, and goes on unchecked -- and despite the Obama administration's supposedly hard-as-nails, cold-as-ice, tough-on-Russia finish.

The Army report continues:

Implicit in Russia’s development of Skolkovo is a critical question—a question that Russia may be asking itself—why bother spying on foreign companies and government laboratories if they will voluntarily hand over all the expertise Russia seeks? Since multinational institutions hire talent worldwide and seek access to foreign markets without regard for national interest, only the U.S. government would be in a position to persuade them to scale back their commitments in Skolkovo if U.S. relations with Russia continue to deteriorate.

However, given the global dimensions of Skolkovo’s technology transfer program, it is not clear how much leverage U.S. industry has. Therefore, the key issue for U.S. policymakers is balancing the benefits of constructive technological engagement with Russia against the risks that Russia could leverage transferred scientific knowledge to modernize and strengthen its military.

Whether that is the key issue for U.S. policymakers, circa 2017, one thing seems clear. They haven't heard of it, and they don't care.

More proof that the hysteria over "Russian influence" on Donald Trump has nothing whatsoever to do with official Washington's (read: the Swamp) concern about the national security of the American people. They are concerned about protecting the Swamp they live in and profit from, and that is all.
 

WAIT.......WHAT!!!!!? :eek2::eek2::eek2::eek2::eek2:

qqJSo4.jpg
 
Awwww shit, thanks bro

I didn’t know, he owned that… so these allegations are weak?
Do you trust Tucker or the kind of “reporters” he’d co-sign??

Apparently he left in 2020 to focus on his Fox show, but just peruse the site and you’ll see it’s just a far right wing rag
 
Do you trust Tucker or the kind of “reporters” he’d co-sign??

Apparently he left in 2020 to focus on his Fox show, but just peruse the site and you’ll see it’s just a far right wing rag
Bro I’m really clueless to these folks.

during lil bush terms j watch the news nightly 3 shows faithfully

after I formed my own thoughts about 911 and Iraq invasion…. I kinda fell back from that shit
 
Judge orders IRS to check whether it criminally investigated Clinton Foundation
BB1gG1Ha.img


A U.S. Tax Court judge ordered the Internal Revenue Service to disclose whether it brought a criminal inquiry against the Clinton Foundation.

The tax agency has said in the past that no such inquiry took place, but Judge David Gustafson insisted the claim "was not supported by the administrative record and thus constituted an abuse of discretion," according to an April 22 ruling obtained by Just The News.

Gustafson sent the case back to the IRS Whistleblower Office to "explore" a "gap" in the agency's records.

"The WO [Whistleblower Office] must further investigate to determine whether CI [criminal investigative division] proceeded with an investigation based on petitioners' information and collected proceeds," the judge said. "It seems clear we should remand the case to the WO so that it can explore this gap."

Gustafson added that a trial pertaining to "dereliction of duty by the IRS" will not take place.

"Petitioners evidently look forward to a trial in which they hope to prove wrongdoing and tax evasion by the target entities and to prove dereliction of duty by the IRS," he said. "There will be no such trial in this case."

The Clinton Foundation made headlines in 2018, when two financial analysts, John Moynihan and Larry Doyle, said they uncovered evidence of pay-to-play and financial crimes in the nonprofit organization, which is operated by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; her husband and former president, Bill Clinton; and their daughter Chelsea Clinton.

The pair of whistleblowers were brought before the House Oversight Committee in December of that year. During their testimony, Moynihan and Doyle said they carried out an extensive forensic investigation based on public records, tax filings, and private interviews with Clinton Foundation officials. The investigators said Clinton Foundation CFO Andrew Kessel admitted to them in a taped conversation that Bill Clinton used the foundation’s bank accounts for personal expenses.

Moynihan and Doyle also said they viewed foundation emails from 2002 discussing deals with the government of Mozambique. Moynihan said this was evidence that the Clinton Foundation was working on behalf of foreign governments even though the foundation’s stated mission in IRS filings at the time was to build Bill Clinton’s presidential library.

The allegations drew questions about possible violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which mandates those engaged in political activities "make periodic public disclosure" of their relationships with foreign dignitaries.

Republican lawmakers criticized the pair for refusing to reveal any tapes or documents it collected. “If you’re not going to share [the documents] with the committee and cut to the chase, my patience is running out,” then-Rep. Mark Meadows, who invited the duo to speak before the panel he led at the time, said in a heated exchange during the December 2018 hearing.

Moynihan and Doyle said they could not turn over the documents from their investigation to the committee because they did not want to infringe on ongoing investigations at government agencies, and they said they hope to make money off their investigation and have turned over the documents to the IRS as part of a “probable cause” submission.

The Clinton Foundation did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Washington Examiner.
The New York Times reported in September 2020 that then-U.S. Attorney John Durham was reviewing the FBI's handling of an investigation into the Clinton Foundation. He "sought documents and interviews about how federal law enforcement officials handled an investigation … into allegations of political corruption” at the nonprofit organization, the report said.

The Clinton Foundation told the news outlet it has "regularly been subjected to baseless, politically motivated allegations, and time after time these allegations have been proven false.”

Durham has left his role as U.S. attorney in Connecticut but is continuing his inquiry into the Russia investigation as special counsel.
 
These folks all connected

Trump Really Was Spied On
Durham says techies linked to the Clinton campaign had access to White House and Trump Tower internet data.
The Editorial BoardFeb. 14, 2022 6:53 pm ET
Special Counsel John Durham continues to unravel the Trump-Russia “collusion” story, and his latest court disclosure contains startling information. According to a Friday court filing, the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign effort to compile dirt onDonald Trump reached into protected White House communications.

The filing relates to Mr. Durham’s September indictment of Michael Sussmann, a lawyer who represented the Clinton campaign while he worked for the Perkins Coie law firm. Mr. Sussmann is accused of lying to the FBI at a September 2016 meeting when he presented documents claiming to show secret internet communications between the Trump Organization and Russia-based Alfa Bank. The indictment says Mr. Sussmann falsely told the FBI he was presenting this information solely as a good citizen—failing to disclose his ties to the Clinton campaign. (He has pleaded not guilty.)


The indictment revealed that Mr. Sussmann worked with “Tech Executive-1,” who has been identified as Rodney Joffe, formerly of Neustar Inc. The indictment says Mr. Joffe used his companies, as well as researchers at a U.S. university, to access internet data, which he used to gather information about Mr. Trump’s communications.

Mr. Durham says Mr. Joffe’s “goal” was to create an “inference” and “narrative” about Mr. Trump that would “please certain ‘VIPs,’ referring to individuals at [Perkins Coie] and the Clinton Campaign.”

***
The new shocker relates to the data Mr. Joffe and friends were mining. According to Friday’s filing, as early as July 2016 Mr. Joffe was “exploit[ing]” his “access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” including “Internet traffic pertaining to . . . the Executive Office of the President of the United States (“EOP”).”

The filing explains that Mr. Joffe’s employer “had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided [internet services]” to the White House. Mr. Joffe’s team also was monitoring internet traffic related to Trump Tower, and Mr. Trump’s apartment on Central Park West.

White House communications are supposed to be secure, and the notion that any contractor—much less one with ties to a presidential campaign—could access them is alarming enough. The implication that the data was exploited for a political purpose is a scandal that requires investigation under oath.

The filing suggests the data collection continued into the Trump Presidency. Mr. Durham says that on Feb. 9, 2017, Mr. Sussmann met with a second federal agency (“Agency-2”) to provide “an updated set of allegations,” and that these “allegations relied, in part, on the purported [internet traffic] that [Mr. Joffe] and others had assembled pertaining to Trump Tower, Donald Trump’s New York City apartment building, the EOP” and a healthcare provider.

(Late Monday a spokesperson for Mr. Joffe said in a statement that “contrary to the allegations in this recent filing, Mr. Joffe is an apolitical internet security expert with decades of service to the U.S Government who has never worked for a political party.” The statement added that “there were serious and legitimate national security concerns about Russian attempts to infiltrate the 2016 election” and that “respected cyber-security researchers were deeply concerned about the anomalies they found in the data and prepared a report of their findings, which was subsequently shared with the CIA.”) That could certainly use some elaboration.

The filing says the new allegations Mr. Sussmann provided—claiming suspicious ties between a Russian mobile phone operator and the White House—were also bogus, and that Mr. Sussmann again made the false claim that he wasn’t working on behalf of a client.

***
The disclosures raise troubling questions far beyond the Sussmann indictment. How long did this snooping last and who had access to what was found? Who approved the access to White House data, and who at the FBI and White House knew about it? Were Mrs. Clinton and senior campaign aides personally aware of this data-trolling operation?

Mr. Durham’s revelations take the 2016 collusion scam well beyond the Steele dossier, which was based on the unvetted claims of a Russian emigre working in Washington. Those claims and the Sussmann assertions were channeled to the highest levels of the government via contacts at the FBI, CIA and State Department. They became fodder for secret and unjustified warrants against a former Trump campaign official, and later for Robert Mueller’s

two-year mole hunt that turned up no evidence of collusion.
Along the way the Clinton campaign fed these bogus claims to a willing and gullible media. And now we know its operatives used private tech researchers to monitor White House communications. If you made this up, you’d be laughed out of a Netflix story pitch.

Mr. Durham’s legal filing is related to certain conflicts of interest in Mr. Sussmann’s legal team, and it remains unclear where else his probe is going. But the unfolding information underscores that the Russia collusion story was one of the dirtiest tricks in U.S. political history. Mr. Durham should tell the whole sordid story.
 
Back
Top