High Rice Cost Creating Fears of Asia Unrest

Makkonnen

The Quizatz Haderach
BGOL Investor
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/29/b...25524-sC1lkhmVBra28HPqm7Y36Q&pagewanted=print

March 29, 2008
High Rice Cost Creating Fears of Asia Unrest
By KEITH BRADSHER

HANOI — Rising prices and a growing fear of scarcity have prompted some of the world’s largest rice producers to announce drastic limits on the amount of rice they export.

The price of rice, a staple in the diets of nearly half the world’s population, has almost doubled on international markets in the last three months. That has pinched the budgets of millions of poor Asians and raised fears of civil unrest.

Shortages and high prices for all kinds of food have caused tensions and even violence around the world in recent months. Since January, thousands of troops have been deployed in Pakistan to guard trucks carrying wheat and flour. Protests have erupted in Indonesia over soybean shortages, and China has put price controls on cooking oil, grain, meat, milk and eggs.

Food riots have erupted in recent months in Guinea, Mauritania, Mexico, Morocco, Senegal, Uzbekistan and Yemen. But the moves by rice-exporting nations over the last two days — meant to ensure scarce supplies will meet domestic needs — drove prices on the world market even higher this week.

This has fed the insecurity of rice-importing nations, already increasingly desperate to secure supplies. On Tuesday, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo of the Philippines, afraid of increasing rice scarcity, ordered government investigators to track down hoarders.

The increase in rice prices internationally promised to put more pressure on prices in the United States, which imports more than 30 percent of the rice Americans consume, according to the United States Rice Producers Association. The price that consumers pay for rice has already increased more than 8 percent over the last year.

But the United States is fortunate in also exporting rice; poor countries ranging from Sengal in West Africa to the Solomon Islands in the South Pacific are heavily dependent on imports and now face higher bills.

Vietnam’s government announced here on Friday that it would cut rice exports by nearly a quarter this year. The government hoped that keeping more rice inside the country would hold down prices.

The same day, India effectively banned the export of all but the most expensive grades of rice. Egypt announced on Thursday that it would impose a six-month ban on rice exports, starting April 1, and on Wednesday, Cambodia banned all rice exports except by government agencies.

Governments across Asia and in many rice-consuming countries in Africa have long worried that a steep increase in prices could set off an angry reaction among low-income city dwellers.

“There is definitely the potential for unrest, particularly as the people most affected are the urban poor and they’re concentrated, so it’s easier for them to organize than it would be for farmers, for example, to organize to protest lower prices,” said Nicholas W. Minot, a senior research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute in Washington.

Several factors are contributing to the steep rice in prices. Rising affluence in India and China has increased demand. At the same time, drought and other bad weather have reduced output in Australia and elsewhere. Many rice farmers are turning to more lucrative cash crops, reducing the amount of land devoted to the grain. And urbanization and industrialization have cut into the land devoted to rice cultivation.

In Vietnam, an obscure plant virus has caused annual output to start leveling off; it had increased significantly each year until the last three years.

Until the last few years, the potential for rapid price swings was damped by the tendency of many governments to hold very large rice stockpiles to ensure food security, said Sushil Pandey, an agricultural economist at the International Rice Research Institute in Manila.

But those stockpiles were costly to maintain. So governments have been drawing them down as world rice consumption has outstripped production for most of the last decade.

The relatively small quantities traded across borders, combined with small stockpiles, now mean that prices can move quickly in response to supply disruptions.

At the same time, prices set in international rice trading now have an increasingly important effect on prices within countries. This has been particularly true in an age of Internet and mobile phone communications when even farmers in remote areas can learn about distant prices and decide whether their own buyers are giving them a fair price.

Even before governments imposed restrictions this week, trading companies in exporting nations had become increasingly reluctant to sign contracts for future delivery as they wait to see how high prices will go.

“The market has pretty much ground to a halt for the past few weeks,” said Ben Savage, the managing director for rice at Jackson Son & Company, a commodities trading firm in London. Soaring prices are already causing hardship across the developing world.

In a crumbling covered market in an old neighborhood of Hanoi, Cao Minh Huong, a ceramics saleswoman, said that rising food prices, especially for rice, were forcing her to change her diet. “I’m spending the same amount on food but I’m getting less,” she said.

Together with rising prices for other foods, like wheat, soybeans, pork and cooking oil, higher rice prices are also contributing to inflation in many developing countries. Retail rice prices have already jumped by as much as 60 percent in recent months in Vietnam, trailing increases in wholesale prices but leading a broader acceleration in inflation. Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung of Vietnam announced Wednesday that the government’s top priority now was fighting inflation. Overall consumer prices are more than 19 percent higher this month than last March. . The inflation rate has nearly tripled in the last year.

Rice is unusual among major agricultural commodities in that most of the major rice-consuming countries are self-sufficient or nearly so. Only 7 percent of the world’s rice production is traded across international borders each year, according to figures from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization in Rome.

Nguyen Van Bo, the president of the Vietnam Academy of Agricultural Sciences, which oversees government farm research institutes, said in an interview that the government expected rice production to rise further by 2010 despite the rapid expansion of residential housing and factories into what had been prime rice-growing land. But the government needs to train farmers to alternate corn with rice to defeat rice pests like the virus, he said.

Vietnam, Egypt and India all limited rice exports last year, but the limits were much less drastic and were imposed much later in the year, after much more rice had been shipped.

The government of Thailand, the world’s largest rice exporter followed by Vietnam, has not yet limited exports. But a national debate has started in Thailand over whether to do so ,and Thai exporters have already practically stopped signing delivery contracts, Mr. Savage said.

Even before Friday’s export restrictions by Vietnam and India, bids for commonly traded grades of Thai medium-grain rice had doubled this year to $735 a metric ton. Vietnamese medium-grain rice had almost doubled to more than $700 a ton, with most of the increase coming in the last four weeks. Bids jumped as much as $50 a ton on Friday.

Governments have been reluctant to tell farmers to sell their rice at low fixed prices, for fear that farmers would hoard rice or not bother to grow as much as they could. On Friday, China, which is virtually self-sufficient in rice, raised the minimum prices for rice and wheat that it guarantees to farmers.
 
Am I the only person here that can see the lessons against socialism.

The countries with the most centralized governments are the countries having the most difficult time adjusting to rising prices.

Countries with more flexible economic systems don't pretend like citizens have a right to rice and instead let people decide whether or not to buy rice given a certain price, crisis not only averted but non-existent.
 
Am I the only person here that can see the lessons against socialism.

The countries with the most centralized governments are the countries having the most difficult time adjusting to rising prices.

Countries with more flexible economic systems don't pretend like citizens have a right to rice and instead let people decide whether or not to buy rice given a certain price, crisis not only averted but non-existent.


SSSHHHHHH !!!!

Don't make sense, they won't like it :lol:
 
Why this can be really bad news?
We are selling our fertile top soil to China. Soon America won't be able to sustain its own food needs. Shortages in China will become shortages in...................guess where?




http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/31/212933/055


Chinese/Asian Markets Panic Over Iowa Sweet Loam Shortage Hotlist
by mwchicago04 [Subscribe]
Mon Mar 31, 2008 at 10:37:17 PM EDT

For those who follow Jerome a Paris and bondad posts closely, you know that prices for agricultural, mineral, and fossil fuel commodities have skyrocketed in the last two years. Just yesterday, Jerome a Paris posited that oil prices could hit unprecedented new heights (possibly $200 per barrel). However, that dire prediction pales in comparison to what has happened overnight in Asian trading markets.

* mwchicago04's diary :: ::
*

Just after midnight GMT, Asian markets hit near panic levels as Chinese speculators snapped up July delivery futures for Iowa Sweet Loam (a particulary nutrient-rich topsoil found only in the Midwest). Analysts from major trading firms such as Goldman Sachs are perplexed as to why the Chinese are essentially trying to corner the market in Loess-based derivatives.

Initial reaction from analysts is that dry winds off the Gobi Desert kicked up toward the end of March and have begun to deplete the soil moisture content in the western regions of China. With China becoming a net importer of agricultural commodities just this year, the political ramifications of not feeding their people would be severe - think North Korea. As we all know, the Chinese will not let that happen.

At the end of trading yesterday at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), a July futures contract could be bought for about $4.01 per cubic foot (about the amount of debris-free topsoil that can fit in a standard metal trash can). This morning (at about 2am gmt), the same contract hit $11.04. This near tripling of contract prices could have a crippling effect on the competitiveness of the American farmer.

Last year, U.S. farmers imported 27,400,000 metric tons of a lesser grade of topsoil from Canada and Central America (mostly Guatemala). If for some reason, the Chinese bid these contracts even higher, it could become economically viable for both of these trading partners to begin shipping their excess topsoil to China directly. Analysts believe that if the price hits $16-17 per contract, US farmers would find it more profitable to dig up their farms and export the top layer of soil.

With increased Midwest grain plantings turning to ethanol production (needs a lesser, siltier grade of topsoil), there is a very real possibility that there will not be enough high-grade Sweet Iowa Loam to cover American food production/consumption. Although no analyst is predicting this today, it is possible that we might become a net importer of food. More than likely, imported from China. Knowing the Chinese record of safety, I find this scenario chilling.

If Washington doesn't intervene (and when was the last time they did that for the average American), we can expect to find much higher prices on our grocery aisle. A $6 gallon of milk or $4 loaf of bread is not out of the question - not to mention the dramatic rise in fossil fuel consumption to ship this Chinese bread to your local grocer.

Long-term this could very well be the last nail in the coffin of the American farmer. Those rows of corn you see as you drive around today, may not be there on this day next year.

[UPDATE: TREAS SEC PAULSON TO ADDRESS PANIC AT 8AM EASTERN. WILL OBAMA FOLLOW?]
 
Am I the only person here that can see the lessons against socialism.

The countries with the most centralized governments are the countries having the most difficult time adjusting to rising prices.

Countries with more flexible economic systems don't pretend like citizens have a right to rice and instead let people decide whether or not to buy rice given a certain price, crisis not only averted but non-existent.
Please, please, PLEASE tell me that your observations of the short-comings of capitalism are JUST as insightful. Especially AMERICAN capitalism.

Please.

And before you say it: I'm no commie.

I'm just an observant cat that knows there's ALWAYS been a happy medium.:cool:

D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
 
Countries with more flexible economic systems don't pretend like citizens have a right to rice...

...and let them starve, as the republicans would have done during the Great Depression were it not for FDR.

You, by the bye, are a full on asshole:hmm:
 
Please, please, PLEASE tell me that your observations of the short-comings of capitalism are JUST as insightful. Especially AMERICAN capitalism.

Please.

And before you say it: I'm no commie.

I'm just an observant cat that knows there's ALWAYS been a happy medium.:cool:

D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
You're partially out of luck D-Nice because I'll be insightful about capitalism, but there are no shortcomings regarding it. However, you are right that American-style capitalism has serious issues but only because there is so much socialism mixed into it.

Capitalism in its most basic form is property rights of individuals. Measuring how absolute those rights are in a society is a way to measure how much freedom is in that society. Now, since I’ve given my definition of capitalism let me state how I define property; wages, profit, land, and essentially everything else that you gain from your actions that doesn’t hurt another person physically or through fraudulent actions. That is consistent with what I said above, you have a right to your money, which could be spent on rice but not the rice itself because someone else owns the rice and they have a right to sell it or not sell it for whatever price they see fit.

In that scenario no one is worse off because you only pay what the rice is worth to you. If the price is too high then you don’t buy, and if the price is what you value rice or below then you buy it. Both of those scenarios leave no room for government intervention like what’s described in the thread’s first article. Giving people, buyers and sellers, the free choice to decide the value of their own property is capitalism no matter what goods are discussed, and as I stated above that is also freedom.

Now, the problem with America and other capitalistic countries is these principles don’t apply across the board. This and all other modern societies think government knows better than the actual owners of capital what should be done with that capital. Top-down authoritative directives of what you should do with your life (your ultimate property) is what socialism is, and that’s what we have in this country in too many instances.
 
You're partially out of luck D-Nice because I'll be insightful about capitalism, but there are no shortcomings regarding it. However, you are right that American-style capitalism has serious issues but only because there is so much socialism mixed into it.

Capitalism in its most basic form is property rights of individuals. Measuring how absolute those rights are in a society is a way to measure how much freedom is in that society. Now, since I’ve given my definition of capitalism let me state how I define property; wages, profit, land, and essentially everything else that you gain from your actions that doesn’t hurt another person physically or through fraudulent actions. That is consistent with what I said above, you have a right to your money, which could be spent on rice but not the rice itself because someone else owns the rice and they have a right to sell it or not sell it for whatever price they see fit.

In that scenario no one is worse off because you only pay what the rice is worth to you. If the price is too high then you don’t buy, and if the price is what you value rice or below then you buy it. Both of those scenarios leave no room for government intervention like what’s described in the thread’s first article. Giving people, buyers and sellers, the free choice to decide the value of their own property is capitalism no matter what goods are discussed, and as I stated above that is also freedom.

Now, the problem with America and other capitalistic countries is these principles don’t apply across the board. This and all other modern societies think government knows better than the actual owners of capital what should be done with that capital. Top-down authoritative directives of what you should do with your life (your ultimate property) is what socialism is, and that’s what we have in this country in too many instances.

preach.jpg

Perfect, but you will be ignored, or castigated as being cruel/sellout/ naive/uncaring.
 
Sam's Club, Costco limit rice purchases as prices rise

Sam's Club, Costco limit rice purchases as prices rise

By MARCUS KABEL, AP Business Writer1 hour, 41 minutes ago

The two biggest U.S. warehouse retail chains are limiting how much rice customers can buy because of what Sam's Club, a division of Wal-Mart Stores Inc., called on Wednesday "recent supply and demand trends."

The broader chain of Wal-Mart stores has no plans to limit food purchases, however.

The move comes as U.S. rice futures hit a record high amid global food inflation, although one rice expert said the warehouse chains may be reacting less to any shortages than to stockpiling by restaurants and small stores.

Sam's Club followed Seattle-based Costco Wholesale Corp., which put limits in at least some stores on bulk rice purchases.

Sam's Club declined to say if this is first time it has restricted sales of bulk foods. The limits affect 20-pound bags, not retail-sized portions. Costco could not immediately be reached for comment on its limits or whether they are the first ever.

Sam's Club said it will limit customers to four bags at a time of imported jasmine, basmati and long grain white rice.

The warehouse chain caters heavily to small businesses, including restaurants. Sam's Club spokeswoman Kristy Reed said she could not comment on whether the problem was caused by short supplies or by customers stocking up in anticipation of higher prices.

USA Rice Federation spokesman David Coia said there is no rice shortage in the United States.

"It's possible that small restaurants and bodega-type neighborhood stores may be purchasing rice in larger quantities than they do typically to avoid higher prices," Coia said about the warehouse chain restrictions.

A smaller chain, Natick, Mass.-based BJ's Wholesale Club Inc., said it is not imposing limits for now.

"At the present time, BJ's Wholesale Club is not limiting the amount of rice purchases made by our members, but, due to the current market situation, that could change at any time," spokeswoman Sharyn Frankel said in a statement.

In New York's Chinatown, shop owners said that they haven't seen people stocking up amid fears of rice shortages.

At Bangkok Center Grocery, one of the main suppliers of Thai food products in New York City, manager Tom Pongsopon said the price of a 25-pound bag of Jasmine rice at his Chinatown store has gone up from $15 to $20 in a matter of months.

People continue to buy rice, but the supply is OK at this point.

"We have enough for now, but I'm not sure about the future," Pongsopon said.

The Sam's Club restriction is effective immediately at all locations where quantity restrictions are allowed by law. It does not apply to other staples such as flour or oil.

"We are working with our suppliers to address this matter to ensure we are in stock, and we are asking for our Members' cooperation and patience," Reed said in a statement.

Sam's Club has 593 stores compared with 2,523 Wal-Mart Supercenters that combine a full grocery section with general merchandise.

Costco has 534 warehouses worldwide, most of them in the United States.

Wal-Mart spokeswoman Deisha Galberth said Wal-Mart stores have no plans for restrictions similar to those at Sam's Club.

"We are not seeing any signs of concern in the supply chain that would cause us to limit the sales of any items," Galberth said.

U.S. rice futures soared to an all-time high Wednesday as investors bet that surging world demand will continue to pressure already dwindling stockpiles. Rice for the most actively traded July contract jumped 62 cents to $24.82 per 100 pounds on the Chicago Board of Trade, after earlier rising to a record $24.85.

Relentless demand from developing countries and poor crop yields have pushed rice prices up 70 percent so far this year, raising concerns of severe shortages of the staple food consumed by almost half the world's population.

The steep increases have followed similar jumps in the price of wheat, corn and soybeans that have added to Americans' growing grocery bill and led to violent food riots in poor countries including Haiti, Senegal and Pakistan.

Most of the rice eaten in the world is consumed within 60 miles of where it was grown, said Nathan Childs, an economist and rice expert with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Traditionally very little of it was traded in the world market.

But as populations crossed borders, the taste for specialty rices such as the Indian basmati, or Thai jasmine rice, which grow only in their areas of origin, spread.

U.S. production of long grain and medium grain rice is strong, and the global crop is larger than ever, Childs said. But with some of the principal exporters of the higher-priced rices, such as India and Vietnam, shunning foreign sales to control prices at home and the cost of food generally going up, the price of rice has been climbing to new heights.

What adds to the price spike — and the run on specialty products like basmati — is that rice consumers tend to be very loyal. The market is highly segmented by type of rice and quality, and buyers will generally not take a substitute, Childs said.

"California's had a pretty good crop, but basmati and jasmine consumers have a history of not switching," he said. "They could always have bought cheaper Calrose. But they don't."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080423/ap_on_bi_ge/wal_mart_rice
 
It's amzing that the first article is so long and makes no mention of biofuel. None whatsoever. It would seem that the environmentalists are beginning to recognize their "oops" as far as that is concerned. As I wrote in another thread, The environmentalists won't be happy until the human race is extinct. They were warned that shortages would occur, as well as deforestation as farmers cut forests to make way for more grain fields. They continued to press forward with their agenda, despite strong objections to their conclusions from world renowned scientists.

With regard to rice, what is happening is that rice growing countries are utilizing much needed food-rice space for biofuel-rice growth. Total rice growth may not be reduced, but the rice used for biofuel production is not used for human consumption.

Politicians needs to stand up to the environmentalists. Yes, biofuels can work in the future, but this blind rush towards biofuel mandates is foolhardy and has serious short term implications, which are being seen worldwide now. Environmentalists block all drilling of new oil fields and building of new refineries, which are actually the quickest way to deal with the current oil problems. Politicians need to say enough is enough, because food riots will not be a pretty sight.

Think about it: did you ever think that you would, in your lifetime, see stores in the USA rationing rice?


Greed; well said about Capitalism.
 
Back
Top