Hamas to Expose Palestinian Collaboration with U.S., U.K., Israel

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Hamas to release files on Palestinian intelligence
collaboration with the U.S.'s CIA, U.K.’s MI5
and Israel's Shin Bet</font size></center>


s_4338.jpg


DEBKAFile
June 23, 2007, 10:32 PM (GMT+02:00)

The centerpiece is evidence of the Palestinian Authority Preventive Security service’s disclosure that Hamas’ elite undercover Unit 102, only 25 strong, underwent lengthy training in Iran in advanced combat tactics modeled on those of the US Seals and the Israel Navy’s Shayetet 13.

DEBKAfile’s military sources add: Unit 102 operated under such deep cover that even the commanders of Hamas’ military wing and its Executive Force did not know it existed. Hamas is making good on its threat to use the huge archive of Palestinian Authority intelligence documents it captured in Gaza to compromise Mahmoud Abbas and members of his regime and show them up as minions of foreign powers and traitors to Palestinian national interests.

http://www.debka.com/index.php
 
debka is often wrong but Ive been waiting for this. How can Israel and US foreign policy heads be stupid enough to think that Israel backing Abbas helps Abbas in the long run? They have just destroyed Fatah's legitimacy in Gaza and the West Bank.
 
I agree, Debka misses the mark, often - probably because a lot of its reporting is claimed to be based on intelligence and I believe it may be a propaganda tool of the state. Sometimes it is appears quite accurate on info that has not yet hit the regular press, sometimes its stories seem clearly aimed at shaping opinion, and other times . . . just misinformation.

They have just destroyed Fatah's legitimacy in Gaza and the West Bank.

Good or bad thing ?

QueEx
 
QueEx said:
I agree, Debka misses the mark, often - probably because a lot of its reporting is claimed to be based on intelligence and I believe it may be a propaganda tool of the state. Sometimes it is appears quite accurate on info that has not yet hit the regular press, sometimes its stories seem clearly aimed at shaping opinion, and other times . . . just misinformation.



Good or bad thing ?

QueEx

Debka's no worse than the NYTimes or WAPO. Actually I think its a step above those two.


Good or Bad? Good because it could rid the Palestinians of corrupt and worthless leadership. But I think its mostly bad. Bad for the US who's backing another loser in the Middle East. Bad for Israel. WTF is going on in Israel? I am beginning to think they have the same types of idiots running shit there as we have here. Cut Fatah/PLO's nuts off and slap them in the face with em for the past 10 years. Then get together with the most ignorant US Administration in history and push for Democracy, then when you discover the people you've been fucking over for 50 years hate you and wants a government that isn't corrupt and actually hates you, you're totally shocked. :hmm: :smh: Then you further weaken Fatah by cutting off all aid for more years via your blind friends in DC. Then when Fatah is basically bumrushed out of all of fuckin Gaza you jump up with a list of muslim dictators and Georgie Bush to say you have Fatah's back and now want to give them arms and cash and even let the Russians give Abbas fuckin armor (apc's). So fuckin retarded.
Now Abbas looks like an Israeli/US Pawn, which he is.

This could force Israel into real peace talks with Abbas if they are scared enough of Hamas getting stronger. Hamas put out a video of the captured Israeli soldier the other day too.

Looking at the situation there Israel has been in the driver's seat for 40 years. They dont want peace, they want land. You can make more kids and the death toll isn't that bad. Israel is running the US 1800s campaign. Make agreements then break them then make em again then break em and kill of your enemy. Only problem is those Palestinians fuck more than Catholics and Israel can't keep up with the babies.

Here's my ultimate take on it. New Democrat President comes in and if its not Hillary, there will be peace. Israel can't win longterm. Not enough people and soon as technology becomes greater those Hamas guys will be strapping tactical nukes to their backs.


I know you heard Musharaff is on his way out too. I see an Afghanistan withdrawl in the future. These fuckin warhawks are too stupid to win a war. Or is it that war is just a diversion to keep eyes away from their trillion dollar money grab/policy rape? Think about it. They undid the telco monopoly laws, removed oversight from every industry with cash, shit canned Habeas even? they're either stupid enough to fuck everything up but the money for them and their friends or smart enough to do exactly what they did.

long ass rant I know- at least people are posting Collin on this side yet :lol:
 

I don't think the world cares what Hamas exposes.

Hamas just cut it's own throat taking over in Gaza.

They now have to take care of the 1.5million people in Gaza. which is cut off from the rest of the world by Israel

On the Other hand Abbas will have a lot of western money flowing his way.

While the west which had cut off funding to any government ran by Hamas will continue to do so.

Abbas has always had to compromise with Hamas when dealing with Israel, now he does not have to.
 
blackIpod said:

I don't think the world cares what Hamas exposes.

Hamas just cut it's own throat taking over in Gaza.

They now have to take care of the 1.5million people in Gaza. which is cut off from the rest of the world by Israel

On the Other hand Abbas will have a lot of western money flowing his way.

While the west which had cut off funding to any government ran by Hamas will continue to do so.

Abbas has always had to compromise with Hamas when dealing with Israel, now he does not have to.
<u>Is Hamas finished?</u>
From what I've read, Fatah isn't exactly secure in the West Bank. While some of the formal passages are blocked into Gaza, the smugglers routes have ALWAYS been open. The one thing I've noticed about Hamas and Hezzbollah is that they both seem to know about winning hearts and minds, especially through the use of whatever social services they're able to provide. The more they're able to do that, the more poor Palestinians are likely to support the militant black and green. The more that happens the fewer behind Abbas.

Sometimes, you have to be careful what you ask for. Fatah's gross corruption and failure to put more of the $$$ pocketed into aid for the people allowed Palestinians to look elsewhere. Hamas' election, then, was predictable. Looks like somebody else understands those dynamics, as well. Iran? Syria? You don't think one of them will find a hole to slip funding through to Gaza?

QueEx
 
QUOTE=QueEx]<u>Is Hamas finished?</u>
From what I've read, Fatah isn't exactly secure in the West Bank. While some of the formal passages are blocked into Gaza, the smugglers routes have ALWAYS been open. The one thing I've noticed about Hamas and Hezzbollah is that they both seem to know about winning hearts and minds, especially through the use of whatever social services they're able to provide. The more they're able to do that, the more poor Palestinians are likely to support the militant black and green. The more that happens the fewer behind Abbas.

Sometimes, you have to be careful what you ask for. Fatah's gross corruption and failure to put more of the $$$ pocketed into aid for the people allowed Palestinians to look elsewhere. Hamas' election, then, was predictable. Looks like somebody else understands those dynamics, as well. Iran? Syria? You don't think one of them will find a hole to slip funding through to Gaza?

QueEx[/QUOTE]

Feed 1.5million people by way of smuggling? Ok keep that dream alive. :lol:
Gaza is cut off from the world.
Gaza has about a 2week supple of food on hands.
Abbas needs to put his feet on the necks of hamas and slowly watch them die off
 
blackIpod said:
Feed 1.5million people by way of smuggling? Ok keep that dream alive. :lol:
Gaza is cut off from the world.
Gaza has about a 2week supple of food on hands.
Abbas needs to put his feet on the necks of hamas and slowly watch them die off

Fuel and Food are going into Gaza. Check your facts. Abbas doesn't have feet to put on anyone's neck. Israel can't afford to even arm him too well unless they decide to make peace, because if they don't make peace those same weapons will be used against Israel.
 
blackIpod said:
... Ok keep that dream alive

Israel Allows Food Medical Supplies into Gaza
JERUSALEM, June 19, 2007
Israel allowed 12 trucks of food and medical supplies to enter the Gaza Strip on Tuesday, Israeli officials and international aid representatives said, in an effort to avert a looming humanitarian crisis now that Hamas is in control.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/20/w...4800&en=61da03712ba853fe&ei=5087 &oref=slogin


Jordan to transfer 450 tons of food, medical supplies to Gaza
June 25, 2007
Jordan announced Monday that it was sending 450 tons of food and medical supplies to the Gaza Strip to help stave off a humanitarian crisis there. A royal palace statement said the aid, worth millions of dollars, will be dispatched Tuesday upon the orders of Jordan's King Abdullah II.

Also note: The Israeli economy is losing about NIS 8 million a day in direct damages from the closure of the Gaza Strip as a result of the Hamas takeover. The main product supplied to the Palestinians is fuel, with annual sales of NIS 2.15 billion in 2006. Dairy and fresh foods supplier Tnuva is one of the companies that will be affected most; it is the biggest food supplier to Gaza.
http://www.freshplaza.com/news_detail.asp?id=3186


Now, who you said is dreaming ???

QueEx
 
Hamas freed a BBC reporter today who was being held for four months by some group called the "Army of Islam".
And the IDF killed a senior Fatah commander in the West Bank
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6260106.stm

Not exactly a great way to kick off the "Fuck Hamas, YAY Fatah" campaign. Abbas' leadership wont remain strong if the IDF keeps assassinating his soldiers :lol:
 
from the July 05, 2007 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0705/p01s01-wome.html
Hamas acts to show it's in charge
The Islamist group won the release Wednesday of a British reporter, solidifying its standing in troubled Gaza.
By Joshua Mitnick | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

Tel Aviv

In an assertion of its new superiority over Gaza, Hamas secured the freedom Wednesday of British Broadcasting Corp. correspondent Alan Johnston, whose nearly four months of captivity was the longest endured by any foreigner abducted during the recent unrest in the Palestinian territories.

Hamas's mix of negotiations and a threat of force to gain the reporter's release marks an epilogue to the Islamist group's swift takeover of Gaza from the secular Fatah Party last month.

The image of a tired but grateful Mr. Johnston seated alongside Hamas's senior leadership in Gaza served notice to Palestinians and the international community of the Islamist group's determination to reestablish internal stability in the coastal strip.

"It's the most unimaginable relief that it's over," said Johnston shortly after being freed. Hamas's leaders "made a huge effort to pressure the kidnappers." Since his March 12 abduction from the streets of Gaza City, Johnston had been held by a radical group that calls itself the "Army of Islam" and is backed Gaza's Dagmush clan – one of several families whose power has grown because of the vacuum created by the Hamas-Fatah rivalry. As long as the clan flouted calls by Hamas leaders to release Johnston and made threats to kill him, Hamas's ascension couldn't be considered complete.

"We won't let anyone kidnap or do anything against our interests. We want to maintain calm and the law in Gaza," said Ghazi Hamad, a Hamas spokesman, on Israel Radio. "I think that all of the families understand this message, and the situation in Gaza will be stable."

Thousands of Hamas gunmen were deployed late Tuesday in the Gaza City neighborhood where Johnston was being held, raising fears of a violent battle. Ultimately, the two sides used Islamic mediators to broker a deal, which ended the standoff with no casualties.

While the rescue is unlikely to end the international boycott imposed on Hamas for its refusal to recognize Israel, it solidifies the group's credentials as rulers with the ability to enforce their will – a striking contrast to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's longtime difficulty in controlling Gaza's armed groups. For Israelis, the freeing of Johnston raised hopes that Hamas would agree to swap a 20-year-old Israeli soldier held for more than a year in return for hundreds of prisoners.

"Hamas proved that they are in control of Gaza. This is a sign to the international community, and to the local community, that 'we can make peace and order,' " says Nashat Aqtash, a former consultant to Hamas's 2006 parliamentary campaign. "Alan Johnston was the only card for Hamas to show that they are capable, and when they make promises, they keep it."

Johnston was just weeks away from the conclusion a three-year stint as the BBC's Gaza City bureau chief when he was abducted. One of the last foreign journalists to remain in Gaza despite the increased targeting of foreigners, Johnston's plight drew sympathy worldwide and among Palestinians.

Johnston said that his one lucky break during his ordeal was getting a radio and being able to listen to the BBC. "I began to realize the extraordinary extent of support that there was," Johnston said.

His kidnappers, headed by a man known as Abu Khaled, were "often rude and unpleasant," he said. They "did threaten my life a number of times in various ways," Johnston said.

Johnston described his captors as a small "jihadi" group focused less on the Palestinian conflict with Israel than on "getting a knife into Britain in some way," he said. In exchange for Johnston, the Army of Islam had originally demanded that Britain free a radical Islamic cleric with ties to Al Qaeda.

Although foreigners have been kidnapped before in Gaza, they have been held for relatively brief periods and the abductors' demands usually focused on money and jobs. By contrast, the demands of "The Army of Islam" to release Muslim hostages in Britain and a videotaped message of Johnston in an explosive-laden belt were chilling suggestions of the influence of Al Qaeda.

But with Gaza caught in a power struggle between Hamas and Fatah, Palestinian security forces avoided moving against the influential clan – a family with militias of its own and a history of alliances with both political parties.

Since their violent takeover of Gaza from security forces loyal to President Abbas's Fatah Party, the Islamic militants have tried to consolidate their grip over Gaza by rounding up weapons held by the myriad armed groups that operate in Gaza. Residents have said that Hamas has eliminated random bursts of gunfire and restored a sense of safety.

The Dagmush clan was able to resist Hamas's show of force because it held Johnston hostage. But a tit-for-tat series of kidnappings between Hamas and the clan signaled that the standoff was escalating toward a conclusion. "We were expecting a big battle and a lot of blood. I was expecting to wake up and to find 20 or 30 people to be killed,'' said Hamada Abu Qamar, a Gaza resident who worked with Johnston at the BBC bureau. "Thank God. This is an unbelievable movement for [Alan] and everyone in Gaza."

Though Hamas ultimately resorted to the mediation of a Muslim cleric who issued a religious fatwa to pave the way for the release, the siege of the Hamas gunmen around Johnston's location is believed to have pressured the family into striking a deal.

Analysts said that the Dagmush family had previously been helped by groups within the Fatah-run Palestinian security services. Hamas's rout of Fatah three weeks ago left the clan isolated.

"The Dagmush family was playing on the divisions between Hamas and Fatah. Now Hamas is the only player around," says Omar Shaban, a former economic consultant to the Palestinian Authority in Gaza. "This is a message to other families, that nobody in Gaza can challenge them."

While Abbas welcomed Johnston's release, a spokesman for the rival Palestinian government in the West Bank accused Hamas of protecting Johnston's captors for months. The same Gaza clan is believed to have helped in the kidnapping of Israeli Cpl. Gilad Shalit more than a year ago, in cooperation of Hamas. Haniyeh said Hamas was interested in ending Mr. Shalit's captivity through an "honorable" prisoner-exchange deal.

• Associated Press material was used.
Full HTML version of this story which may include photos, graphics, and related links



A similar Jerusalem Post article
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1183459198379&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
 
<font size="5"><center>How U.S. policy missteps
led to a nasty downfall in Gaza</font size>
<font size="4">
Plan to isolate Hamas boomeranged</font size></center>

McGlatchy Newspapers
By Warren P. Strobel and Dion Nissenbaum
Posted on Wed, July 4, 2007

WASHINGTON — Officials in the Bush administration awoke on the morning of January 26, 2006 to catastrophic news.

Hamas, a violent Islamist movement whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel, had won Palestinian parliamentary elections — elections that were deemed free and fair and a cornerstone to President Bush's initiative to bring more democracy to the Muslim world.

For the next 17 months, White House and State Department officials would undertake an all-out campaign to reverse those results and oust Hamas from power.

Instead of undermining Hamas, though, the strategy helped to exacerbate dangerous political fissures in Palestinian politics that have delivered another setback to the president's vision of a stable, pro-Western Middle East.

The administration's drive to change the political facts on the ground foundered on opposition in Congress, the differing goals of Middle East allies such as Saudi Arabia, and an inability to provide Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas with the full backing he needed to confront Hamas.

Three weeks ago, Hamas leaders outmaneuvered everyone else and seized the Gaza strip in a swift military campaign that vanquished secular Fatah forces loyal to Abbas. Abbas, with U.S. encouragement, responded by dissolving the Hamas-led government and declaring emergency rule. Now, with Palestinians divided into two mini-states in Gaza and the West Bank, mediating a peace deal with Israel will be harder than ever.

The strategy toward Hamas was overseen by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and carried out largely by Elliott Abrams, a leading neoconservative in the White House, and Assistant Secretary of State David Welch.

At its heart was a plan to organize military support for Abbas for what opponents of the strategy feared could have become a Palestinian civil war, according to officials in Washington and the Middle East, and documents.

As recently as March 2007, Jordanian officials developed a $1.2 billion proposal to train, arm and pay Abbas' security forces so they could control the streets after he dissolved the government and called new elections. McClatchy Newspapers obtained a copy of the plan. While two sources close to Abbas said U.S. officials were involved in developing and presenting the plan, a State Department official described it as a Jordanian initiative.

Ultimately, congressional concerns in Washington and Israeli objections kept any significant military aid from being delivered, even as Israeli intelligence and the CIA warned that Hamas was becoming stronger.

Long term, the U.S. effort to oust Hamas has further deepened doubts in the Middle East about the administration's understanding of the complex region.

"America is so far away, they are completely misinformed about what is happening," said Munib Masri, a Palestinian businessman allied with Abbas. "The more they do against Hamas, the more power they (Hamas) get from the people."

Well before the January 2006 elections, the White House and Rice had ample warning about the risks of allowing Hamas to participate, according to two senior U.S. officials. Among those raising alarms were Arab leaders and Tzipi Livni, now Israel's foreign minister.

But Abbas argued that elections wouldn't be credible without Hamas, and Washington went along, said one of the senior U.S. officials, who agreed to be interviewed only on condition of anonymity due to White House-imposed ground rules.

Was that a mistake?

"Maybe," he said. "The question was debated at the time."

Once Hamas was elected, the White House gave almost no thought to accepting the results and trying to co-opt the hard-line Islamist group, which the U.S. government deems a terrorist organization, current and former U.S. officials said.

After the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, "I don't think it was ever possible emotionally, ideologically ... for this administration to consider reaching out, probing" Hamas, said Aaron David Miller, who advised six secretaries of state on Arab-Israeli negotiations.

Instead, Rice orchestrated an international financial boycott of the new Palestinian government, an action that failed to weaken Hamas or force it to moderate its views.

Simultaneously, throughout the spring and summer of 2006, the United States pressed Abbas to confront Hamas to end the political paralysis in the Palestinian Authority.

In a July 2006 meeting with Abbas, Abrams and Welch urged him to dismiss the government, said Edward Abington, a former U.S. diplomat who advises the Palestinian president.

Abbas "just refused," Abington said. "He was afraid there would be armed rebellion."

"The U.S. clearly pushed for a confrontation between Fatah and Hamas," wrote Alvaro de Soto, the U.N.'s Middle East envoy, before retiring this spring in a final report.

The senior administration official used different phraseology.

Abrams and Welch, the official said, discussed two options with Abbas: new elections, or an emergency government, followed by elections.

As the financial pressure on the Hamas-led government failed to undermine it, the Bush administration increased emphasis on training, equipping and arming Abbas' security forces.

But resistance from Congress and Israel prevented this third element in the U.S. plan from getting off the ground.

Despite repeated requests from Abbas and his security advisers for more weapons, little was provided. In December, Egypt transferred about 2,000 rifles, 20,000 ammunition clips and about 2 million bullets to Abbas' forces in Gaza.

Congressional leaders from both parties voiced skepticism about a separate $100 million U.S. plan to train and provide non-lethal equipment to Abbas loyalists. Lawmakers shelved the plan for months, and forced it to be cut nearly in half.

Top Abbas military strategists criticized Lt. Gen. Keith Dayton, the U.S. officer charged by the Bush administration to help overhaul Palestinian security forces, for offering no substantive support.

"My problem is that I have sat several times with General Ward (the previous U.S. security coordinator) and General Dayton. ... We repeat the same things and there is no action," said Brig. Gen. Yunis El As, head of training for the Palestinian Authority National Security Force.

Meanwhile, Hamas was using underground tunnels to smuggle large caches of weapons into Gaza.

Frustrated Abbas security aides urged the Palestinian president to follow suit and start smuggling in weapons for his forces.

"We urged him to buy weapons on the black market, but he refused," said Abu Ali Shaheen, a member of the Fatah Revolutionary Council.

Fatah's weaknesses were ever more evident on the streets of Gaza, where the Abbas loyalists were consistently beaten by Hamas fighters in a series of deadly clashes between the two factions.

This did not upset American officials, according to De Soto's final report, which was leaked to Britain's Guardian newspaper. "I like this violence, " de Soto quoted an unnamed U.S. official as stating, because "it means that other Palestinians are resisting Hamas."

With Palestinians at the brink of civil war, close U.S. ally Saudi Arabia undertook its own peace initiative to halt the bloodshed.

And in February 2007, Abbas-rejecting the advice of aides who argued for confrontation-joined forces with Hamas to form a national unity government.

Israel and the United States felt betrayed by the deal, signed in the Saudi city of Mecca, seeing it as a step backwards for Abbas, who had now formally allied himself with the hard-liners both countries had worked to isolate.

As concerns grew that Hamas was getting the upper hand, Jordanian officials, after consulting U.S. diplomats, developed and presented to Abbas the $1.2 billion plan to arm the Palestinian president's security forces so that they could control the streets once he dissolved the coalition government and called new elections.

The plan, first reported last month by the Jordanian newspaper Al Majd, called for efforts to "undermine the political strength of Hamas." It envisioned financial and political aid for Abbas so he could "build the political capital to move on with plan 'B' (early Parliamentary elections in the Palestinian territories.)"

Israeli intelligence briefings had been warning all year that Hamas was getting stronger and Fatah forces weren't up to the task of fighting back.

The CIA's assessments of the power balance "were accurate-which is to say they were gloomy," the senior administration official said.

Some observers say that fear of the U.S.-led effort to arm Abbas, as anemic as it was, prompted Hamas to continue preparing for a major showdown. The senior Bush administration official vigorously disputed such a link.

Last month, according to Shaheen, Hamas leaders made a secret trip to meet Jordanian officials and present a dramatic proposal: Hamas wanted to seize control of Gaza and allow Jordan to retake control of the West Bank.

The idea, he said, was summarily rejected. But it was another sign Hamas was preparing for a major clash.

"Everybody knew a force was being trained in the Gaza Strip to confront Hamas," said a former senior Israeli government official, who spoke anonymously because of the sensitivity of the subject. "To assume that Hamas would sit idly by and wait for this to culminate in success was very short-sighted."

Hamas attacked in mid-June, sweeping away Fatah's forces in Gaza in a matter of days.

Bush administration officials argue that the attack revealed fractures in Hamas, saying it was apparently ordered by military commanders at odds with Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh. Hamas is now politically isolated, they say.

But as Rice and Israel again move to bolster Abbas with hundreds of millions of dollars in previously blocked funds, some current and former U.S. officials say the Bush administration has repeatedly underestimated Hamas and failed to recognize how dysfunctional its Fatah ally had become.

Said Miller: "I don't know if we grasp it even now."

Nissenbaum reported from Jerusalem and Gaza.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/17588.html
 
McClatchy is one of the few good places to find news

If Bush and Co. pick any side to win any conflict bet against them.
Hamas would recognize Israel tomorrow if Israel recognized Palestine's right to exist as well. That part of the story never gets told.
 
<a set="yes" linkindex="1" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-fatah6jul06,0,5510000,full.story?coll=la-home-center">http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-fatah6jul06,0,5510000,full.story?coll=la-home-center</a><br>




<div class="body"><i>From the Los Angeles Times</i></div>




<h1>Fatah on shaky ground in West Bank</h1>


<div class="storysubhead">Many are looking to the fractured Palestinian party to curb Hamas' reach, but some wonder whether it will be able to hang on to its stronghold.</div>






By Ken Ellingwood<br>



Times Staff Writer<br>



<br>

July 6, 2007<br><br>








RAMALLAH, WEST BANK — Routed in the Gaza Strip, the Fatah party of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is fractured and adrift at a moment when it is viewed by the outside world as the best hope for blunting the militant Hamas movement in the West Bank.<br><br>Once dominant in Palestinian affairs, the organization long led by the late Yasser Arafat is beset by a weak and aging leadership, internal schisms and a widespread reputation among Palestinians as corrupt, ineffectual and out of touch. Those troubles have some Palestinians wondering whether Fatah is more likely to lose the West Bank than to recapture the Gaza Strip from Hamas.<br><br>The crisis facing Fatah has deepened since Hamas crushed its forces in Gaza last month, leaving Fatah's authority limited to the West Bank. The United States, Israel and European allies have promised to bolster Abbas, a relative moderate, and his party as a way to isolate Hamas.<br><br>Fatah ruled unchallenged under Arafat, but was sent reeling after his death when it lost to Hamas in parliamentary elections in January 2006. Fatah's calamitous military defeat in Gaza has heightened worries among members.<br><br>"I was shocked. I felt that Fatah was gone everywhere, in the West Bank and Gaza," said Rashad Abu Hamid, 27, a Fatah activist in the West Bank town of Hebron. "We realized there was a big gap between the base and the leadership."<br><br>The defeat has injected Abbas, 72, with uncharacteristic assertiveness, which he displayed by firing the Hamas-led government, naming an emergency Cabinet and signing a decree to disarm militias.<br><br>In Gaza, however, Hamas has ignored the government's dismissal. And few here believe Abbas is strong enough to take the guns from militia groups, including the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, which is tied to Fatah but acts outside Abbas' control.<br><br>For their part, Fatah officials have responded to the Gaza loss by blaming one another, with little sign of serious reckoning at top levels over how to revive their beleaguered party. The leaders want early elections, though it is not clear that Fatah would win. <br><br>Hani Masri, a political analyst in the West Bank, said the Gaza defeat unmasked deep problems that bode ill for Fatah's lasting prospects in the West Bank, long the party's stronghold. <br><br>"It shows there is something wrong in leadership, administration, in the movement, in its forces, in its ideologies. And these problems exist in the West Bank," Masri said. "If Fatah does not learn from these mistakes, the West Bank will be similar to Gaza, even if it takes longer."<br><br>Masri said Fatah, long roiled by personality conflicts and turf battles, lost its sense of purpose after Arafat's death in November 2004. <br><br>"He was the glue for Fatah," Masri said. "When he left, the last thing uniting the movement was gone."<br><br>Ahmed Abdel Rahman, a Fatah spokesman, said the party was in shock after the bloody takeover in Gaza. But he said it would recover because of the appeal of its political program calling for an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. <br><br>"It will be a long march," he said. "Fatah will not be defeated." <br><br>The resumption of Western aid will make it easier for Abbas to govern, but some Fatah members worry that his domestic standing could suffer if the Bush administration and Israel are seen as trying to prop him up.<br><br>Fatah was once a guerrilla movement and cornerstone of the Palestine Liberation Organization, but its dominance later made it virtually indistinguishable from the governing Palestinian Authority, created in 1994 by the Oslo interim peace accords.<br><br>The collapse of the peace process with Israel in the wake of the Palestinian uprising and disenchantment over graft and cronyism within the Palestinian Authority fed a voter backlash that enabled Hamas to win the 2006 elections under the banner of reform.<br><br>Fatah, which controlled the authority's security forces, resisted the power shift during months of on-and-off skirmishing in Gaza, Hamas' main base of support. But Fatah's aura of strength proved illusory, with top commanders fleeing Gaza amid the street battles and their fighting forces collapsing with stunning suddenness.<br><br>Fatah appears to boast a far more formidable armed force than Hamas does in the West Bank, but Fatah members fear that their party may disintegrate as a political force in the West Bank unless it takes steps to rejuvenate itself, starting with choosing new leaders.<br><br>"There is no vision for the future. There is no plan," said Kadoura Fares, a former Fatah lawmaker who has urged the party to hold a long-delayed convention to put fresh faces in the top roles.<br><br>The current leadership "will lead us to another big failure, which is the West Bank," said Fares, 45. "We will lose everything."<br><br>Fatah leaders, many of whom are in their 70s, have not groomed successors and have done much to lock younger members out. Mohammed Dahlan, a lawmaker in his mid-40s, has often been mentioned as a possible top leader, but his image has been hurt since the defeat in Gaza, where he was supposed to embody Fatah muscle.<br><br>Fares and some other activists say the best way to keep Hamas at bay in the West Bank is for Israel to release Marwan Barghouti, the jailed leader of the Palestinian uprising and a Fatah member. <br><br>Barghouti, who is serving five consecutive life terms for his role in attacks that killed five people, regularly emerges in polls as the most popular Palestinian political figure.<br><br>A recent poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research found that in a presidential vote, Barghouti would handily defeat Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, the fired prime minister, 59% to 35%.<br><br>Abbas, by contrast, would beat Haniyeh by 49% to 42%. The poll found that two of five voters would not participate in the elections if Abbas and Haniyeh were the candidates. That figure fell to less than a third if the candidates were Haniyeh and Barghouti. <br><br>Israel has consistently rebuffed calls to free Barghouti, though many Israelis expect that he will be released one day, perhaps as part of a peace agreement. <br><br>Fatah activists say their party has failed where Hamas has succeeded best: at the street level. Fatah focused on running government agencies while Hamas built grass-roots support through affiliated aid programs, community events and sympathetic clerics preaching its messages, former Fatah lawmaker Fares said.<br><br>"We think that it's enough that we are in power, that we use the power of the ministries to lead Palestinians forever," he said. "Hamas became strong under our umbrella."<br><br>Fares and other activists have launched a limited effort to rebuild Fatah through planned events in about 15 neighboring villages north of Ramallah. Organizers are forming committees to raise money for local events, including the revival of an annual Fatah banquet for high school students finishing year-end examinations.<br><br>Elsewhere in the West Bank, activists say fears that Hamas would impose a strict Islamic social code might help draw women to the more secular Fatah.<br><br>Jamal Abu Rob, a Fatah legislator from the West Bank town of Jenin, said the party needed an enlistment drive. But in a sign of disarray, it does not even have a list of enrolled members, he said. <br><br>Abu Rob, a former Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade leader, said gunmen would agree to Abbas' order to turn in weapons if Israel promised to stop pursuing them. Israeli forces have killed two Al Aqsa militants during West Bank raids in the last week after Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert pledged support to Abbas.<br><br>Many Israelis believe it is only a matter of time until Abbas talks with Hamas to reach some form of accommodation, if not another full power-sharing arrangement. Israeli intelligence officials say Fatah supremacy in the West Bank is exaggerated, and many Palestinians agree. <br><br>Nashat Aqtash, an assistant professor of communications at Birzeit University, near Ramallah, said Fatah leaders made their biggest mistake in Gaza by underestimating Hamas. <br><br>"They are also miscalculating the power of Hamas in the West Bank," he said. <br><br>--<br><br><hr width="20%"><i>ellingwood@latimes.com<br><br></i>
 
<h1>Hamas pressed by Israel and Palestinians in W.Bank</h1>
<div class="timestamp">Fri Jul 6, 2007 7:34AM EDT</div>

<p>By Adam Entous and Atef Sa'ad</p>

NABLUS, West Bank (Reuters) - Ahmed Alhaj Ali's tumultuous week started with his detention by Palestinian forces loyal to President Mahmoud Abbas of Fatah and ended with him shuttling from safe house to safe house to evade Israeli arrest.

Since Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip three weeks ago, triggering a crackdown by Fatah-led security forces and militias on the Islamist group in the occupied West Bank, Hamas leaders like Alhaj Ali, a member of the Palestinian parliament, have been hiding from Palestinians and Israelis alike.

Forces loyal to Abbas have detained at least 299 Hamas supporters in the West Bank in the last three weeks, according to a Hamas official. Security sources confirmed dozens of arrests and said some of the detainees were found with large caches of guns and ammunition and would be tried.

Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said 130 remained in custody as of Thursday. Security sources in the West Bank put the number still held at "dozens". Senior Abbas aide Yasser Abed Rabbo dismissed suggestions detainees may be harmed: "There are no illegal arrests. None of them has been mistreated," he said.

Hamas has protested at the arrests and warns of retaliation. Some of its supporters were taken away not by uniformed security personnel but by masked gunmen linked to Fatah's al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades militant movement and other splinter groups.

There have been similar reports of intimidation in the Gaza Strip targeting Fatah. Hamas gunmen have brought members of Fatah, including the daughter of Abbas's intelligence chief, in for questioning. On Thursday Hamas deployed its forces to try to prevent some pro-Abbas public employees from reporting to work.

The International Committee of the Red Cross said it has been visiting detainees in the West Bank and Gaza but, in line with the organization's standard practice, would not say whether any concerns about their treatment had been raised.

In the West Bank, some detainees said they were freed only after signing pledges not to join Hamas's armed wings and not to conspire against the government. Hamas is shunned by Israel and Western powers for refusing to renounce violence against Israel.

Over the past year, Israel has already arrested nearly half of Hamas's parliamentary majority bloc, making it virtually impossible for the body to reach a quorum to hold a vote on Abbas's decision to sack the Hamas-led government and appoint a new administration headed by Prime Minister Salam Fayyad.

NO LONGER 'COMRADES'

Already a frequent flashpoint for violence between Palestinian militants and Israeli forces, Nablus has become the focus in Fatah's campaign against Hamas in the West Bank.

"Before Gaza, we dealt with Hamas activists as comrades in arms. Now we know we were wrong to consider them partners, friends," said Akram al-Rajoub, who heads the Fatah-dominated Preventive Security service in the city of 200,000.

The Preventive Security building was plastered with posters depicting top Fatah militant Samih al-Madhoun, who was killed by Hamas after last month's fighting in Gaza, and of a Hamas gunman stepping on a picture of late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.

An aide to Rajoub showed visitors a video aired on Hamas television showing Madhoun in his death throes, blinking and gasping for air as gunmen stood over his bullet-riddled chest.

The West Bank crackdown is increasing pressure on "zakat" charity committees that support the network of Islamic schools and health clinics which helped fuel Hamas's rise to power.

In Nablus, 20 gunmen pushed their way into a dairy funded by a zakat, but those managing the plant persuaded them to leave.

"We told them this factory was not for Hamas but was for the Palestinian people," said Abdul Raheem Hanbali, who heads the zakat committee and runs the dairy. "We are not afraid."

The Islamic Solidarity health clinic in Nablus, which is funded by the local zakat, has seen a 20 percent drop in patient visits since Hamas's seizure of Gaza. "These patients, they want to avoid any charges ... that they are Hamas or supporters of Hamas," Hafez Sadder, the clinic's director, said.

Rajoub said his men were targeting militants, not charities, and added: "There is absolutely no cooperation with Israel in our activities." Israel has seized militants from both factions.

IN HIDING

Alhaj Ali and Ahmed Doleh, an assistant to the interior minister in the Hamas-led government dismissed by Abbas, were arrested by Abbas's men in Nablus on Monday. Alhaj Ali was freed two hours later but Doleh remains in custody.

Since his release, Alhaj Ali has been on the run: "I can't tell you where I am because I'm hiding from the Israelis," he said by phone. He tries to switch safe houses every three days.

At least 26 Hamas supporters remain in custody at a Nablus prison run by Abbas's Force 17. Prison officials would not allow journalists to see the detainees but said they were receiving adequate food and medicine and were being treated like "guests".

"We don't ask them why they belong to Hamas," Rajoub said. "Our questions are based on getting concrete information about weapons and any evidence that they threaten the authority."

Yazid Khader, a Hamas member who also served in the dismissed government, said Hamas' patience in the West Bank was growing thin and that the group's leaders may not be able to prevent all of its activists from striking back at Fatah.

"(Hamas) leaders are lying low not out of fear," Khader said. "We're trying to avoid a confrontation with the Authority. (But) we can't control everyone completely."

Another source close to the Hamas leadership, warned: "If this goes on, it will open the gates of hell."

(Additional reporting by Wafa Amr and Mohammed Assadi in Ramallah and Nidal al-Mughrabi in Gaza)
 
<font size="5"><center>On Mideast peace mission,
Rice plans to ignore Hamas' Gaza takeover</font size></center>


By Dion Nissenbaum
McClatchy Newspapers
Tue, July 31, 2007

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip — When Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice flew to Israel last July in an unsuccessful attempt to broker an end to that nation's brief war with Hezbollah in Lebanon, she described the turmoil as the "birth pangs of a new Middle East."

But as Rice travels to Israel on Wednesday on a high-profile peace initiative, the new Middle East has a new political fact: The Islamist Hamas party took full control of the Gaza Strip in June, splitting the Palestinian Authority in two.

As much as Rice wants to isolate Hamas, which the U.S. government considers a terrorist organization, any diplomatic drive must confront the fact that Islamist forces control the coastal Mediterranean region that was meant to be a cornerstone of a new Palestinian state.

"Nobody can make peace without Gaza," said Hirsch Goodman, a senior fellow with the National Institute for Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. "Nobody can make peace without 1.5 million Palestinians. You can't heal a body with cancer without treating it."

For now, however, the Bush administration and Israel are treating Hamas like a tumor that's too big to remove: They're ignoring it and lavishing all their attention on their preferred Palestinian leader, 72-year-old Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

After years of foot-dragging, Israel and the United States are moving more quickly than ever to help the pragmatic Abbas in the West Bank:

_ Israel, the United States and much of the world have established political ties with the caretaker government that Abbas created with questionable legality.

_ Israel has released millions of dollars in frozen Palestinian tax money, allowing Abbas to pay tens of thousands of struggling government workers who haven't received regular paychecks since before Hamas took control of the Palestinian Authority last year.

_ Israel has granted amnesty to more than 150 Palestinian militants who turned in their guns and has freed 250 Palestinian prisoners, most of them allied with Abbas' Fatah movement. Last week, Israel reportedly approved the import of 1,000 rifles for Abbas' security forces to help them ensure that Hamas isn't able to do in the West Bank what it did in Gaza.

_ There's renewed talk in Israel about pulling back from major West Bank cities and turning over control to Palestinian forces.

The goal is to provide Abbas, also known as Abu Mazen, with the political, military and economic support he needs to persuade voters to reinstall his fractured Fatah party as the leader of the Palestinian Authority in early elections.

At the same time, Israel and the Bush administration are counting on Abbas to follow through on long-standing promises to reform Fatah and end the rampant corruption that was at the heart of its 2006 electoral loss to Hamas.

The drive toward new elections ignores not only the potential illegality of such a vote under Palestinian law but also the fact that Hamas is likely to block early elections in the Gaza Strip.

It's also possible that Israel could work to thwart the elections by cracking down on Hamas and arresting candidates.

"How are we going to guarantee the result of the election in the West Bank?"

asked Mahmoud Zahar, the Hamas leader who served as foreign minister in the first Hamas government. "How is Abu Mazen going to carry out an election in the Gaza Strip? Without a national agreement, no election can take place."

Some worry that the "West Bank first" strategy inevitably will propel Israel toward a military showdown with Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

"He who says that we must put all our money on Fatah must assume that, at some given moment in the future, it may be necessary to militarily confront Hamas in a massive way," said Efraim Halevy, the former director of Israel's Mossad spy agency.

"With Hamas you have to do one of two things: Either you have to deal with them or you have to utterly and completely destroy them," said Halevy, who was among a minority to call on Israel to open talks with Hamas when the Palestinian group took political control last year.

"All this is in preparation for a major showdown with Hamas. And with all the arms that have been amassed in the Gaza Strip, it's not going to be a knock-over."

Yossi Alpher, a former negotiator for Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, said the best thing diplomats could do right now was focus on the West Bank and leave the problem of Gaza for later.

"You don't deal with Gaza now; you have to reduce your expectations," said Alpher, a co-director of the Web site bitterlemons.org. "You don't really have a solution for Gaza right now, so you see if you can do something with the West Bank."

McClatchy Newspapers 2007

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/18572.html
 
Back
Top