Hackers break into University emails and uncover the global warming conspiracy.
- Thread starter domex
- Start date
word alex jones is a reatrd
but I gotta say nothing wrong with cleaning the environment
Word i did not know that, how so?
there are better vids on whatreallyhappened.com , this is 2 weeks old, and they blow the lid off the global warming scam by Gore and Obama.now where is all the global warming supporters.
Thanks im going to check it out now.
"Global Warming" A Debate at Last http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/_global_warming_a_debate_at_last.html
SPPI Monthly CO2 Reports http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monthly_report/
CO2, Global Warming and Coral Reefs: Prospects for the Future http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/co2_coral_warming.html http://www.amazon.com/dp/0971484589/?tag=vp314-20 CO2, Global Warming and Species Extinctions: Prospects for the Future http://www.amazon.com/s/?tag=vp314-20
Climate Science Corrupted http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/climate_science_corrupted.html
"'Unequivocal' 'Consensus' on 'Global Warming'" http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/unequivocal_consensus_on_global_warming.html
Public Comment to the Environmental Protection Agency http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/c...t_to_the_environmental_protection_agency.html
41
The Science of Deceit http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/the_science_of_deceit.html The IPCC can't count its "Expert Scientists": Author and Reviewer Numbers are Wrong http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/author_reviewer_numbers_wrong.html
Prejudiced Authors, Prejudiced Findings http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/prejudiced_authors_prejudiced_findings.html
Why the IPCC Should be Disbanded http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/whytheipccshouldbedisbanded.html
Peer Review? What Peer Review? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/peerreview.html
What is Wrong with the IPCC? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/whatiswrongwiththeipcc.html
A Climate Science Brief http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/climate_science_brief.html
Senator Kerry Misfires about Global Warming and National Security http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/sen_kerry_misfires.pdf
‘Global Warming’ is No Global Crisis, Major Talking Points http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/major_talking_points.html
Twisted Science, Crooked Policy http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/twisted_science_crooked_policy.html
The Dog Ate Global Warming http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/the_dog_ate_global_warming.html
Hockey Stick? What Hockey Stick? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/what_hockey_stick.html
Caspar and the Jesus Paper http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/caspar_and_the_jesus_paper.html
What is the 'Hockey Stick' Debate About? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/hockey_debate.html
That Famous Consensus http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/that_famous_consensus.html
Why Has “Global Warming” Become Such A Passionate Subject? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/akasofu_cool_it.html
42
Medieval Warm Period Project http://www.co2science.org/data/mwp/mwpp.php
Climate Change, William Happer testimony to Senate Energy Committee http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/happer_senate_testimony.html
Cleaning Out the Climate Science Cesspool http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/cleaning_cesspool.html
Scenes from the Climate Inquisition http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/scenes_from_the_climate_inquisition.html
NCAR US Temperature Record Facts or Deception? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/temperature_record_facts_or_deception.html
The Coming Climate Dictatorship http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/the_coming_climate_dictatorship.html
Peer Warns Public About Dangers to Fundamental Freedoms at Forth-Coming UN Copenhagen Summit http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/peers_warns_dangers_of_un_summit.html
Copenhagen Climate Treaty Framework Draft http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/copenhagen_climate_treaty_framework_draft.html
450 Peer Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of AGW-Caused Global Warming http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/450_peer_reviewed_papers.html
SPPI Monthly CO2 Reports http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monthly_report/
CO2, Global Warming and Coral Reefs: Prospects for the Future http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/co2_coral_warming.html http://www.amazon.com/dp/0971484589/?tag=vp314-20 CO2, Global Warming and Species Extinctions: Prospects for the Future http://www.amazon.com/s/?tag=vp314-20
Climate Science Corrupted http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/climate_science_corrupted.html
"'Unequivocal' 'Consensus' on 'Global Warming'" http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/unequivocal_consensus_on_global_warming.html
Public Comment to the Environmental Protection Agency http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/c...t_to_the_environmental_protection_agency.html
41
The Science of Deceit http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/the_science_of_deceit.html The IPCC can't count its "Expert Scientists": Author and Reviewer Numbers are Wrong http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/author_reviewer_numbers_wrong.html
Prejudiced Authors, Prejudiced Findings http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/prejudiced_authors_prejudiced_findings.html
Why the IPCC Should be Disbanded http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/whytheipccshouldbedisbanded.html
Peer Review? What Peer Review? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/originals/peerreview.html
What is Wrong with the IPCC? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/whatiswrongwiththeipcc.html
A Climate Science Brief http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/climate_science_brief.html
Senator Kerry Misfires about Global Warming and National Security http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/sen_kerry_misfires.pdf
‘Global Warming’ is No Global Crisis, Major Talking Points http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/major_talking_points.html
Twisted Science, Crooked Policy http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/twisted_science_crooked_policy.html
The Dog Ate Global Warming http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/the_dog_ate_global_warming.html
Hockey Stick? What Hockey Stick? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/what_hockey_stick.html
Caspar and the Jesus Paper http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/caspar_and_the_jesus_paper.html
What is the 'Hockey Stick' Debate About? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/hockey_debate.html
That Famous Consensus http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/that_famous_consensus.html
Why Has “Global Warming” Become Such A Passionate Subject? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/akasofu_cool_it.html
42
Medieval Warm Period Project http://www.co2science.org/data/mwp/mwpp.php
Climate Change, William Happer testimony to Senate Energy Committee http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/happer_senate_testimony.html
Cleaning Out the Climate Science Cesspool http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/cleaning_cesspool.html
Scenes from the Climate Inquisition http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/scenes_from_the_climate_inquisition.html
NCAR US Temperature Record Facts or Deception? http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/temperature_record_facts_or_deception.html
The Coming Climate Dictatorship http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/the_coming_climate_dictatorship.html
Peer Warns Public About Dangers to Fundamental Freedoms at Forth-Coming UN Copenhagen Summit http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/commentaries_essays/peers_warns_dangers_of_un_summit.html
Copenhagen Climate Treaty Framework Draft http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/copenhagen_climate_treaty_framework_draft.html
450 Peer Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of AGW-Caused Global Warming http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/reprint/450_peer_reviewed_papers.html
Subs.
thank u sir
bullshit laws that take more money from the poor
blaming human beings for climate change is a way to impose high taxes on the people and to further control its citizens. There are people and corporations who will make billions of dollars off of GW fixes! And there are politicians who will benefit from close association with these businesses who will make the billions of dollars!
Everyone knows that picture is actually captioned "French vs. American..." but it's just like a Dominicano to be desperately riding some crackas' nuts, pretending to be white.
I am all for it if that is the only way to get the chemical and oil industry to clean up their act and stop treating the planet like a trash can
I mean all you right wingers don't seem to mind your tax dollars killing millions of arabs for the sake of owning a pipeline
I gotta do more research before, I even begin to listen to this sensationalist dickhead here. He does drop gems from time to time, but even Michael Ruppert called this loud dickhead a racist. Ruppert was a regular guest on his show before they fell out. 
The difference between science and politics, religion or the bar-room debate, is that data can be reviewed or regathered and results and hypotheses can be retested. Of course trust is useful, but ultimately science will correct errors or even deliberate corruption.
This story says nothing so far about the actual actions of those scientists involved, just some email banter expressing their frustration or off the top of the head reactions to one thing or another that comes up. It is a worry though.
So the first thing would be to rigorously review the actual work these folk were doing and see if there are any problems. Only then will we know if there is any issue of the science being corrupted (which I doubt but it needs to be considered).
If it were corrupted, then those couple of planks of evidence that these people were involved in would have to be considered false or unsafe and would need to be reviewed. The tens or hundreds of other lines of evidence that were derived independently of these individuals will remain valid.
Realistically, with thousands of scientists working in a given area you are certain to get some unwise communication and quite possibly some deliberate corruption. However, the whole point is that science never bases its findings or recommendations on one or two individual studies - it is the huge body of evidence that points towards the truth of man-made global warming that has the community concerned.
To conclude that the whole ediface of global warming evidence is under threat is no more valid than finding one politician that said or emailed something compromising, and concluding that all politicians must be corrupt; or to find one dodgy surgeon and conclude all surgeons are dangerous butchers.
This story says nothing so far about the actual actions of those scientists involved, just some email banter expressing their frustration or off the top of the head reactions to one thing or another that comes up. It is a worry though.
So the first thing would be to rigorously review the actual work these folk were doing and see if there are any problems. Only then will we know if there is any issue of the science being corrupted (which I doubt but it needs to be considered).
If it were corrupted, then those couple of planks of evidence that these people were involved in would have to be considered false or unsafe and would need to be reviewed. The tens or hundreds of other lines of evidence that were derived independently of these individuals will remain valid.
Realistically, with thousands of scientists working in a given area you are certain to get some unwise communication and quite possibly some deliberate corruption. However, the whole point is that science never bases its findings or recommendations on one or two individual studies - it is the huge body of evidence that points towards the truth of man-made global warming that has the community concerned.
To conclude that the whole ediface of global warming evidence is under threat is no more valid than finding one politician that said or emailed something compromising, and concluding that all politicians must be corrupt; or to find one dodgy surgeon and conclude all surgeons are dangerous butchers.
Kyoto Protocol.
Even though Global Warming is Exaggerated, We should all strive to be energy efficient. I eventually plan to move out of this damn sub-division (Once the housing market levels off), get some land, build a house and put solar panels and grow food for future generations.
AL GORES "plan" will keep more money in your pocket.
AL GORES "plan" will keep more money in your pocket.
I hear you plus it's not a bad fallback just in case peak oil make the world go crazy.
So I shouldn't be alarmed that it was 65 degrees today in December here in washington d.c.?
Nope. just like the folks in Houston TX ain't alarmed that its snowing. The Earth is constantly shifting its axis.
They want this carbon tax bad...But we should be efficient if for nothing else to keep our monthly bills down. By being more self sustaining in our own homes providing our own energy needs instead of depending on the state, country, etc.
So I still shouldn't be alarmed that it was 65 degrees two days ago and now its snowing here in D.C. as well?
Maybe my mind is playing tricks on me, but I swear the weather didn't change this drastically when I was a shorty.
Similar threads
