Guns, Bomb Shelters & Anti-Radiation Meds: People of FINLAND Preparing for WAR with Russia

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Guns, bomb shelters and anti-radiation meds: More people in Finland are preparing for war with Russia





It’s another Tuesday night of training for the Vantaa Reserves Association, the local chapter of the Finnish Reservists’ Association. But since Russia invaded Ukraine, these nights at a local range have felt different.

There’s an extra energy in the air, perhaps best shown by anxious chatter over the group’s social media channels or their increased numbers. More than a quarter of its 1,354 members have joined in the past several weeks.

Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.

In the weeks since war broke out in Europe, thousands of Finns have signed up with training associations to sharpen their military skills or learn new ones like first aid. The dramatic rise has been fueled by anxiety over Finland’s geographic proximity to Russia. For the first time in Finland's history, a majority of Finns are in favor of joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, a defensive alliance.

“Our president says we are not scared, but we are aware,” said Kettunen, dressed in combat boots, a camouflage vest and shirt, and olive green pants. “That’s quite nice to say, but where else do they (the Russians) go if the plan is to make The Great Russia, from Lisbon to the Japanese sea?”

Finland remains one of the few European nations with mandatory military service, primarily due to its lengthy 830-mile shared border and memories of battles with Russia during the last century. That history has also shaped its politics, which focused on neutrality during the Cold War and walking a middle ground between the West and Russia ever since as key to maintaining its independence.

For years, joining NATO, which was created to limit Soviet expansion, seemed like a distant possibility for many Finns. Now, it is an urgent option for many, with some Finns noting that Ukraine’s efforts to join the alliance were rebuffed before it was invaded.

In recent weeks, Finnish officials have engaged in a whirlwind of meetings with European officials and officials say the country’s politicians could begin the process of joining NATO by summer. That’s despite threats from Moscow about the possible consequences for the nation of 5.5 million should it take that route.

“We never let our guard down after the Cold War ended, as many European Countries did,” said Janne Kuusela, director general at Finnish Ministry of Defense. “In that sense, we’re well placed to defend ourselves if need be in the future.”

Kuusela said there is no direct threat to Finland from Russia, but there are concerns among Finns about a prolonged period of instability in Europe. The two countries previously enjoyed lots of cross-border travel and trade, but that has been cut off for weeks because of sanctions enacted against Russia, he said.

“There's quite poor visibility for what lies ahead, there’s lots of uncertainty and it may be that there will be a longer period of poor relations between Russia and the West,” Kuusela said.

Although 900,000 Finns nationwide have gone through military training, the country’s wartime reserve capacity has seen 280,000 of them trained up to mobilize.

Many more Finns have decided they want to be ready to join the fight. The 45,000-member national reservist association gained more than 6,300 new members in recent months, nearly twice the number of people who joined its ranks between 2015 through 2021. Meanwhile, the National Defense Training Association of Finland, which is supervised by the Ministry of Defense and works closely with the military, has seen up to an eight-fold increase in the number of training course enrollees, with more classes oversubscribed than ever before.

“Many people say they are alarmed by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, they want to keep their military capabilities up to date, they want to learn new things, they want maybe to make up for mandatory service they didn’t take very seriously at the time,” said Ossi Hietala, training officer for the National Defense Training Association of Finland. “They want to make sure they are prepared for the worst.”

That’s what Kettunen and his buddy Vesa Kortelainen, 44, who led drills with a half-dozen members at the recent practice, have heard from people joining the group. Both served in the same platoon in Kosovo decades ago.

“The consensus is it’s not looking good for Europe at the moment,” Kortelainen said, noting that while unlikely, the risk of the war spreading is higher than it was at any other time in his lifetime. “For Finns, it’s more probable to go to war than it has been in my lifetime.”

Russia’s invasion has unified and strengthened the country, taking away the internal focus from petty partisan arguments, Kortelainen said. “Now even the dreamers see that anything is possible,” he added.

Kortelainen said he’s been saying Finland should join NATO since the 1990s after the Soviet Union collapsed, but the country has been ambivalent because of its close cultural ties to Russia. Culturally, it’s East facing, but economically and through its values, it faces West.

He said Finns have been too gullible about neutrality, wanting to “be friends with Russia.” But after their actions in Ukraine, he wonders if this is even possible.

“In my opinion, the best time to apply for membership is now, and the second-best option is today,” Kortelainen said.

For many Finns, memories of the Winter War in 1939 evoke a kind of post-traumatic stress and a sense of deja vu.

At the time, Soviet leader Joseph Stalin used concerns over a possible attack by Nazi Germany to demand, among other things, that Finland move a portion of its border with the Soviet Union back 16 miles. After failed negotiations, the Red Army invaded with 450,000 troops. The United Nations predecessor, the League of Nations, expelled the Soviet Union for what it deemed an illegal attack.

“It was like Ukraine in February, everybody cheering for Finland, but we were left quite alone, we had to fight insane odds” against Russia without military support, Kortelainen said.

Despite impressive resistance, the Finns were no match for the Red Army’s sheer numbers and superior military strength. After roughly three months, Finland agreed to peace terms, ceding 11% of its territory to the Soviet Union, but managing to maintain its independence.

More recently, if the Finns thought their efforts to stay neutral were any type of protection from Russia, Russia’s war against Ukraine showed them otherwise.

Today, roughly 60% of Finns support joining NATO, up from pre-war numbers that saw 20% of Finns supporting membership and the vast majority undecided about the matter. Finnish parents who once worried about their children being forced to fight in a war have seen that Russia’s actions cannot necessarily be influenced by what their country does or does not do.

“Russia has shown when they went to Ukraine that they never changed,” said Minna Nenonen, executive director of The Finnish Reservists’ Association. “They are always Russia and they are always behaving the same way. So now all Finns know it’s very possible that at some point they could come here also.”

Timo Virtanen, 35, co-founder of a Finnish IT software company, is one of six Finns who put forward a referendum to bring the question of whether Finland should join NATO to a public vote. All six found each other on a small gaming forum before Russia invaded Ukraine.

Never hugely political, Virtanen felt like this was a moment to act. Finns have felt an acute sense of anxiety since Russia invaded Ukraine, with Potassium pills to counteract thyroid damage against radiation difficult to find in the country and efforts underway to ensure bomb shelters are in good working order.

Most tangible, perhaps, was watching NATO nations move their soldiers to strategic positions to protect one another while Ukraine was on its own against Russia.

“Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has made some moves possible that just weren’t a year back, or a couple of months back,” Virtanen said. “Now it seems that we are getting on a more honest level, that well, you (Russia) are not to be trusted. So we better do what's best for us.”

For years, Finnish officials have said joining NATO would require clear support from Finnish citizens. But, Virtanen said, they have never worked to increase such support, often referencing the “NATO option” as a way to acknowledge but never truly act on the issue.

A similar effort to submit a pro-NATO initiative to Parliament was put forth several years earlier, but at the time Virtanen didn’t even hear about it. It failed to get enough signatures to qualify. This time around, the effort, which went live three days before the invasion, gained the 50,000 required signatures in a week and then some – more than 76,007 people signed in support. It was sent to Parliament on March 8.

Virtanen said some of the people who signed expressed a sense of relief to him and that “perhaps by signing this thing and giving support to this initiative, at least I've done something to make Finland more secure.”

Parliament isn’t obliged to act on the referendum and conduct a public vote, but its submission is history-making nonetheless.

Virtanen said Finland would be an asset to NATO, given its strategic location and overall readiness as a nation.

“I can’t see that much harm in joining, especially since I presume that one can always resign. So why not give it a try,” Virtanen said. “I’d be surprised if it’s not something we’ll try in the next couple of years.”

Tami Abdollah is a USA TODAY correspondent. Send tips via direct message @latams or email tami(at)usatoday.com

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Guns, bomb shelters and anti-radiation meds: More people in Finland are preparing for war with Russia



Guns, bomb shelters and anti-radiation meds: More people in Finland are preparing for war with Russia (msn.com)
 
Finland to Discuss NATO Membership Next Week, Risking Putin's Fury

1649865376799.png
Finland's Prime Minister Sanna Marin talks to the press as she arrives for the second day of a European Union (EU) summit at the EU Headquarters, in Brussels on March 25, 2022.LUDOVIC MARIN/AFP/GETTY IMAGES


Newsweek
BY EWAN PALMER
4/13/22 AT 7:00 AM EDT


Finland's Prime Minister Sanna Marin said the country will hold a debate on whether to apply to join NATO with a decision expected to be made shortly afterwards.

Marin made the announcement during a joint-press conference with Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson in Stockholm, with both countries having debated joining NATO in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine in late February.

The parliamentary debate in Finland will take place after a government-commissioned report was released on Wednesday highlighting the change in security across Europe amid the war in Ukraine.

The report is scheduled to be debated in Finland's parliament next Wednesday (April 20) with a decision on whether to join NATO expected to be made "within weeks," according to Marin.

The proposed move to join NATO by Finland, which shares a border of more than 800 miles with Russia, risks infuriating Moscow and President Vladimir Putin.

If Finland joins NATO it would officially end a post-World War II agreement that saw the country essentially act as a neutral buffer between the West and what was then the Soviet Union, and further aggravate Russia due to the alliance's expansion.

"Both Finland and Sweden make independent decisions regarding security policy arrangements," Marin said. "But we do that with a clear understanding that our choices will affect not only ourselves, but our neighbors as well.

"Our aim is clear. We want to guarantee peace in the future for us and for our region and for Europe, and to contribute towards that aim with our own choices."


Marin added that a debate in parliament on whether to join NATO is important as a wide consensus on such a decision was required given Russia is their "next door neighbor" that "acts like this," she said in reference to its military aggression against Ukraine.

"We need to have a view on the future and we are using this time to analyze and build common views on the future when it comes to security.

"I won't give any kind of timetable when we will make our decisions, but I think it will happen quite fast. Within weeks, not within months," Marin said. "All the parliamentary groups and also the president will have the opportunity to make the decision in the upcoming weeks."


Russia has already warned Finland and Sweden that they risk facing military consequences if they join NATO.

On Monday, unverified footage emerged online showing what appeared to be Russian military vehicles being placed near the country's border with Finland.

The footage arrived as Moscow once again warned Finland and Sweden against joining NATO.

"We have repeatedly said that the alliance remains a tool geared towards confrontation and its further expansion will not bring stability to the European continent," Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters.


NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg recently said that the alliance would "welcome" Finland and Sweden to the coalition if they decide to apply for membership.

Update 4/13/22, 8:00 a.m. EDT: This article has been updated throughout to include more detail.


Finland to Discuss NATO Membership Next Week, Risking Putin's Fury (newsweek.com)
 
Last edited:
56900955.jpg
 
Russia Warns Sweden, Finland Against Joining NATO


Newsweek
BY ISABEL VAN BRUGEN
ON 4/11/22


The Kremlin on Monday warned Finland and Sweden against joining NATO, arguing that the possible accession of the countries to the military alliance would not bring stability to Europe.

Ending Ukraine's desire to join NATO was one reason given behind Russia's invasion of its neighbour [Ukraine] in February in a war that has pushed European countries to rethink their security policies.

"We have repeatedly said that the alliance remains a tool geared towards confrontation and its further expansion will not bring stability to the European continent," Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters during a press briefing when asked about the possibility of the nations joining NATO.​

His remarks came shortly after U.S. officials told The Times of London that Finland and Sweden could join the alliance as soon as the summer, with NATO membership for both countries being "a topic of conversation and multiple sessions" last week during talks between NATO's foreign ministers attended by Sweden and Finland.

An Estonian diplomatic official and an official in the U.K.'s NATO delegation told Newsweek that The Times report was accurate. The Estonian official said both Sweden and Finland participated in a NATO meeting last week.

The Times reported that Finland could submit an application for NATO membership in June, with Sweden expected to follow.

Newsweek contacted NATO for comment, but was redirected to comments made by the alliance's Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg last week.

Finland Prime Minister Sanna Marin said on April 2 that the country will make up its mind by the end of spring on whether to apply to become a member of the alliance.

"Russia is not the neighbor we thought it was," Mari said, adding that the country's relations with Moscow have changed in an "irreversible" way since Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine on February 24.

The secretary for Sweden's ruling Social Democratic party, Tobias Baudin, told local media outlets that it was reviewing its international security policy, and would discuss whether or not to join NATO. That review should be complete within the next few months, he said.


Russia Warns Sweden, Finland Against Joining NATO
Russia Warns Sweden, Finland Against Joining NATO (newsweek.com)
 
How the NLAW Anti-Tank Missile Auto Locks on Enemy Tanks


This is an informative video about the NLAW next generation anti tank system. It uses a predictive guidance system to track enemy tanks and lock onto them. I'm your average infantryman Chris Cappy here to examine my top favorite relatively new anti-tank weapon system. Historically since WW2 soldiers have preferred to travel the battlefield within the safety of an armored vehicle but all that is changing now as tanks are becoming giant sitting ducks. How does it feel now that the tables have turned! The hunter becomes the hunted!
 
What I am concerned about is a person or group holding on to bizarre racial beliefs of superiority about another group that has made significant technological and military advancements. They will continue to engage in dangerous games such as slowly expanding their military alliance or violating their sovereignty.

This is what happened to Hitler which led to the annihilation of millions of Germans. The same thing that will lead to nuclear war. This impenetrable force of racism is what I deal with on a daily basis, they are unable to accept my superiority.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

17 Never pay back evil for evil to anyone. Respect what is right in the sight of all men.
18 If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men.
19 Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay,” says the Lord.
20 “But if your enemy is hungry, feed him, and if he is thirsty, give him a drink; for in so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.” 21 Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

Based on my analysis, I believe racism will be the end of humanity.

It is good that many countries in African do not possess nuclear weapons or advanced military weaponry, they would not be able to accept this condition in any way. They would violate their sovereignty and engage in other reckless conduct leading to nuclear war even in the face of certain annihilation. Look at what the U.S. did to get Bin Laden, flying into a country with nuclear weapons.
 
The banned weapon Russia (and the US) won’t give up


Vox


10.5M subscribers
JOIN

SUBSCRIBE


Why war crimes investigators are looking for cluster bombs in Ukraine. Subscribe and turn on notifications so you don't miss any videos: http://goo.gl/0bsAjO

In Ukraine, human rights investigators like Amnesty International and Bellingcat have been tracking Russian attacks to aid in a potential war crimes investigation. One thing they’re paying special attention to is cluster bombs. Cluster bombs were first used in World War II; they scatter numerous smaller bombs over a wide area — often killing civilians. It’s this indiscriminate nature that often makes their use a war crime. Our modern conception of war crimes was created by a series of treaties spanning decades. In 1977, one of those treaties banned what’s known as “indiscriminate attacks.” That means militaries are legally prohibited from attacking an area imprecisely, in a way that can harm civilians. Russia is not alone in using these weapons: In conflicts since the 1977 treaty, many militaries continue using them in civilian areas, with impunity, including the US. This video explains how they’re being used by Russia, and why places like the US and Russia just won’t give them up.
 
Armchair quarterbacking this conflict, handing out weapons to fight the Russians was a bad idea. They are riding around in military uniform, clearly identified, while the Ukrainians can blend in to the population. This is how it was in Iraq and Afghanistan for us giving them a clear advantage.

You need to hand weapons to people wearing a military outfit, to protect the civilian areas. This could give justification for an opposing military to attack civilian targets.

img.jpg
 
A world war is looming.

Perhaps! The world has teetered on or close to the brink at different times, for forever. It is doubtful that perfect harmony will ever exist, but the hope is that differing people with differing interests can reason/compromise even when conflict is imminent.
 
Perhaps! The world has teetered on or close to the brink at different times, for forever. It is doubtful that perfect harmony will ever exist, but the hope is that differing people with differing interests can reason/compromise even when conflict is imminent.

It's unfortunate that proxy wars are being fought over and the people that will be suffering are both the Ukrainians and the Russian people. Those at the top of the chain won't be effectively affected once this has been completed.

Question. What could be the possible endgame scenario from this conflict, once concluded?
 
Finland and Sweden, moving toward possible NATO membership, brace for Russian backlash

April 19, 2022
Melissa Rossi

Last Wednesday in Stockholm, the prime ministers of Sweden and Finland, countries where neutrality and military non-alliance are deeply woven into their cultures, shocked the world by issuing a joint statement that, thanks to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, they were considering applying for membership in NATO.

“There is a before and after Feb. 24,” Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson told reporters in reference to Russia’s latest military incursion in Ukraine. “The security landscape has completely changed.”

“We have to be prepared for all kinds of actions from Russia,” Finnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin said, adding that Finland would decide about applying to NATO in a matter of weeks.

While both countries had already closed off their skies to Russian air traffic, the announcement about NATO membership further risked the wrath of the Kremlin, which has repeatedly threatened both against joining the 30-member military alliance.

Over the last week in Sweden, radios, portable generators and camping stoves are flying off shelves as its 10.4 million citizens begin stocking up on canned food, water, flashlights and matches in preparation for anticipated acts of Russian sabotage. In Finland, where the government has stockpiled enough grains and fuels in strategic reserves to last at least five months, they’re expecting more cyberattacks like those that hit the ministries of defense and foreign relations on April 8, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed the Finnish Parliament via video. Like the Swedes, the 5.5 million residents of Finland believe that Russia will soon target its infrastructure, including the internet and electrical grid, and Russian violations of the airspace in both countries are already on the rise.

In response
to their public declarations of interest in NATO membership, Moscow has renewed its threats to retaliate and bolster nearby ground and air forces, deploying “significant naval forces in the Gulf of Finland,” according to Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council. "There can be no more talk of any nuclear-free status for the Baltic [Sea],” Medvedev added, a threat dismissed by analysts in the region as saber rattling, since tiny Kaliningrad, a Russian exclave on the Baltic, is widely believed to already hold nuclear weapons.

“If you’re talking about large nuclear weapons, it doesn’t really matter if the bases literally are in the Baltic Sea or the Gulf of Finland, if it is in Kaliningrad or if they’re 500 miles away,” Charly Salonius-Pasternak, security and defense analyst at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs in Helsinki, told Yahoo News.

The addition of Finland and Sweden to the Western military alliance would not only expand NATO territory by 300,000 square miles toward the northeast — in blatant defiance of Putin’s demands last December to shrink NATO’s footprint — but it would also roughly double NATO's borders with Russia to nearly 1,600 miles. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, who called Sweden and Finland “our closest partners,” said in early April that he expected all NATO “allies will welcome them.” He added, “We know that they can easily join this alliance if they decide to apply.”

“These are two really capable military powers
, who are far more capable than the size of the countries would suggest,” Ivo Daalder, former U.S. ambassador to NATO, told Yahoo News with regard to Sweden and Finland. And they would also boost military capabilities in the Baltic Sea, home to three small NATO countries — Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania — whose defense has always posed a problem for the alliance, Daalder said.

The likely accession of Finland and Sweden is “a really big deal” for NATO as well as Finland and Sweden themselves, Daalder added.

“Sweden has been neutral or [militarily nonaligned] since 1814,” he noted. And Finland, which became independent from Russia over a century ago, “has never wanted to be part of any alliance since it became independent in 1917. ... But for the invasion of Ukraine, this wouldn’t have happened.”

Indeed, even three months ago the prospect of Sweden and Finland joining NATO didn’t appear in the cards. Finnish Prime Minister Marin said in January that her country was “very unlikely” to join NATO under her watch, a sentiment that was echoed by Sweden’s defense minister. Two weeks ago, however, Marin did an about-face, proclaiming that “Russia is not the neighbor we thought it was.”

The fact that “Russia seems willing to invade, on completely false pretenses, its neighbors that don’t belong to NATO” sparked a realization among Finns, who have long tried to placate the Kremlin, Salonius-Pasternak said.

Specifically, when the citizens of Finland, which fought the Soviet Union after it invaded in 1939, watched Russia’s savage attacks unfold in Ukraine, something fundamental changed in their logic. After Russia’s atrocities in Bucha became clear earlier this month, Finnish public support for joining NATO soared to 68%. Local thinking, Salonius-Pasternak said, switched from “If we join NATO, Russia may get annoyed and do something bad to us” to “They may do something bad anyway, so why not seek a form of deterrence that is completely unavailable to them?”

“What happened,” Salonius-Pasternak added, “was the Finnish population drew some conclusions which forced the hand of the Finnish political elite, and thereby also the Swedish.”

Gunilla Herolf, senior associate research fellow at the Swedish Institute of International Affairs in Stockholm, agreed that Finland is blazing the trail toward NATO membership. “Finland has been taking the lead,” she told Yahoo News. “After public support for NATO went up so much in Finland, people in Sweden started to realize that it’s very likely that Finland will join, and that made public opinion go up in Sweden as well.” The two countries have a very close relationship, she added, which only intensified in 2014 when Russia invaded Ukraine the first time, annexing Crimea.

The Swedish army participates in a military exercise in the Artic Circle, Norway, on March 25 in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. (Yves Herman/Reuters)
© Provided by Yahoo News USThe Swedish army participates in a military exercise in the Artic Circle, Norway, on March 25 in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. (Yves Herman/Reuters)

Herolf expects that the extensive cooperation of Sweden and Finland with NATO, with which they often perform joint military exercises and whose forces they fought alongside in the Balkans and Afghanistan, will help speed up the process of applying for membership.

But there’s a risk: While Finland and Sweden are expected to apply in the coming weeks, their acceptance into the military alliance depends on unanimous agreement from all 30 of NATO’s current members, a process that could take months.

“That invitation needs to be ratified by all 30 current members, and that means that the U.S. Senate will have to ratify it, and 29 parliaments will have to ratify it,” said Daalder. While he doesn’t foresee any problems, he added, “you never know — maybe a parliament gets dissolved and therefore there’s no parliament to ratify it.”

Until their membership is ratified, Finland and Sweden will remain vulnerable. If Russia attacked either before they were admitted to the alliance, neither could invoke Article 5, the NATO clause that states that an attack on one member is an attack on all.

Another potential snag is the upcoming presidential election in France. Right-wing candidate Marine Le Pen, currently trailing incumbent President Emmanuel Macron by at least 7 points, has vowed to cut France’s military involvement with NATO.

“While the ratification process among the 30 NATO members could happen quickly," said Daalder, “the problem is it needs to go quickly in 30 countries. The real question is, what do you do in the meantime?” Once Finland and Sweden are officially invited to apply to NATO, Daalder said, even before their membership is approved by member countries, “the president of the United States should make clear that until such time as these countries are formally part of NATO, that we, the United States, hopefully with partner countries, are committed to defending their security.”

In the meantime, both Finland and Sweden are boosting their armed forces and ramping up annual spending on civil defense and arms. The Finnish government in February ordered 64 F-35s from Lockheed Martin, with a price tag of over $9 billion. Sweden, where the 2021 defense budget was around $7 billion, is expected to raise that amount to about $11 billion, roughly the 2% of GDP required of NATO members.

Finland and Sweden, moving toward possible NATO membership, brace for Russian backlash (msn.com)
 


CBS News


4.37M subscribers


SUBSCRIBE
With Finland stating that it wants to join NATO "without delay." Russian President Vladimir Putin and his country responded with threats. CBS News chief foreign affairs correspondent and "Face the Nation" moderator Margaret Brennan joins "Red and Blue" to discuss that and more. CBS News Streaming Network is the premier 24/7 anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations, available free to everyone with access to the Internet. The CBS News Streaming Network is your destination for breaking news, live events and original reporting locally, nationally and around the globe. Launched in November 2014 as CBSN, the CBS News Streaming Network is available live in 91 countries and on 30 digital platforms and apps, as well as on CBSNews.com and Paramount+.
 

Turkey to hold talks with Sweden, Finland over Nato membership

Turkey wary over countries' plans to join Nato as they are 'home to many terrorist organisations,' says President Tayyip Erdogan

Sweden_Nato_AFP.jpg

A few hundred protesters gather during a demonstration against possible Nato membership for Sweden outside the ruling Social Democratic Party's office in Stockholm on 14 May (AFP)


Foreign ministers from Finland, Sweden and Turkey will hold talks in Berlin on Saturday to resolve disagreements over Finnish and Swedish plans to join Nato, as the alliance meets against the backdrop of the Russia's war in Ukraine.

The Nordic states are gearing up to apply for membership of the 30-strong transatlantic alliance in response to what they see as a fundamentally altered security situation due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. That has drawn threats of retaliation from Moscow and objections from Nato member Turkey.

Turkey's Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu told reporters as he arrived in Berlin that it was "unacceptable and outrageous" that prospective new Nato members gave support to the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), potentially complicating the alliance's enlargement.

"The problem is that these two countries are openly supporting and engaging with PKK and [mainly Kurdish militia operating in Syria] YPG. These are terrorist organisations that have been attacking our troops every day," Cavusoglu said, adding that he would hold talks with his Swedish and Finnish counterparts Saturday evening.

"A big majority of the Turkish people are against the membership of those countries... and are asking us to block this membership," he said.

Finnish Foreign Minister Pekka Haavesto said he was confident in the end a solution would be found. Swedish Foreign Minister Ann Linde told Swedish news agency TT she would seek to sort out any misunderstandings.

Nato Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has promised both Nordic countries a warm welcome and a swift accession procedure, but Turkey on Friday unexpectedly threw a wrench in the works.

Stoltenberg, who cannot take part in the Berlin meeting as he has tested positive for Covid, spoke with several of the ministers on the phone before the talks began, among them US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and the foreign ministers of Turkey, Finland and Sweden.

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan had said on Friday he could not support the Nordic countries' plans given they were "home to many terrorist organisations," but his spokesperson told Reuters on Saturday that Turkey had not shut the door.

Allies will also explore security guarantees for Finland and Sweden for the duration of a ratification period that could take as long as a year, during which the Nordic countries are not yet protected by Nato's Article 5, which guarantees that an attack on one ally is an attack on all.

They will also assess the military situation on the ground and their aid to the Ukraine military, and will discuss a first draft of Nato's new strategic concept, its basic military doctrine, which is set to be agreed upon at a leaders' summit in Madrid at the end of June.

"I think [Russian] President Vladimir Putin needs to take a look at himself in the mirror. You reap what you sow," Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly said, adding she was confident a consensus would be reached for Finland and Sweden to join the alliance.
 
For Putin,
a Nordic Nightmare Is Springing to Life


MSN
May 15, 2022

An apartment that took a direct hit during heavy Russian bombardment in Kharkiv on Saturday.
© Finbarr O'Reilly for The New York Times An apartment that took a direct hit during heavy Russian bombardment in Kharkiv on Saturday.


For years, President Vladimir V. Putin has viewed the expansion of NATO as an existential threat that would leave Russia hemmed in with Western missiles on its doorstep.
Now, Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine seems to be bringing the Russian leader’s nightmare to life, with NATO on the brink of starting its largest potential expansion in nearly two decades.

After navigating the postwar era in nonalignment and neutrality, Sweden and Finland are now actively exploring ascension to the military alliance forged in the Cold War, with officials from both countries set to meet with their NATO counterparts on Saturday.

Russia lashed out immediately, halting exports of electricity to Finland and promising an unspecified “military-technical” response after warning that the move would pose a clear threat to its own national security.

Some analysts were concerned that Russia was laying the groundwork to threaten the deployment of nuclear weapons near the border with Finland. But officials in both Sweden and Finland played down that threat, noting that with the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad only 200 miles away, Moscow already has nuclear-capable missiles in easy range.

An acceptance of Sweden and Finland into NATO, a process that could take up to a year to finalize, would bring the Western military alliance right to Russia’s 810-mile-long border with Finland and would mark another profound shift to Europe’s strategic landscape brought on by Russia’s war in Ukraine. At the same time, the Pentagon is rotating new troops into Europe to bolster the alliance’s eastern flank, signaling that the temporary troop buildup is likely to become permanent.

As Western powers buckled down for what Ukraine’s defense minister called a “new, long phase” in the war, developments on the ground bore out the idea that Ukraine was still fighting Russia doggedly in the east and reporting that it was gaining ground.

In recent days, Ukrainian forces have begun consolidating control over the major city of Kharkiv after months of Russian attacks and heavy shelling. In a seeming replay of the Russian retreat from Kyiv, its battered battalions are withdrawing in order to protect critical supply lines to the east and to reinforce struggling units elsewhere in the Donbas in the country’s east, Ukrainian officials said.

The head of Kharkiv’s regional military administration said on Saturday that Ukrainian forces had started a counteroffensive against Russian forces around the northeastern city of Izium, which Russia captured last month and had hoped to use as a base for a drive south into other major cities.

In a flurry of U.S. diplomacy, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, made a surprise visit on Saturday to Ukraine to meet with President Volodymyr Zelensky. The accompanying delegation of American lawmakers was just the latest to travel to the country as the United States deepens its commitment to Kyiv’s fight against the Russian invasion.

The United States Secretary of State, Antony J. Blinken, was scheduled to travel to Germany on Saturday, to meet with NATO counterparts ahead of discussions with Sweden and Finland.

In a phone call on Saturday, President Sauli Niinisto of Finland said he told President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia that his country is seeking to join NATO because Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine had “fundamentally” altered Finland’s security environment.

Mr. Putin warned the Finnish leader it was a “mistake” to abandon Finland’s longstanding policy of military neutrality, the Kremlin said in a statement.

“By joining NATO, Finland strengthens its own security and assumes its responsibility,” the Finnish president said in a statement, adding that Finland wants “to take care of the practical questions arising from being a neighbor of Russia in a correct and professional manner.”

Members of a Ukrainian mortar team prepare to fire toward Russian positions two miles away, in the village of Pytomnyk 17 miles north of the eastern city of Kharkiv, on Friday.
© Finbarr O'Reilly for The New York TimesMembers of a Ukrainian mortar team prepare to fire toward Russian positions two miles away, in the village of Pytomnyk 17 miles north of the eastern city of Kharkiv, on Friday.


There was initial alarm as Turkey, a longtime NATO member, signaled this week that it might seek to block the Nordic countries’ joining the alliance. But on Saturday, a spokesman for President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey walked back any potential challenge, saying that Turkey was merely trying to ensure that all alliance members’ security concerns were heeded.

A Ukrainian family exploring a destroyed Russian tank on the main highway leading west out of Kyiv on Saturday.
© Ivor Prickett for The New York TimesA Ukrainian family exploring a destroyed Russian tank on the main highway leading west out of Kyiv on Saturday.

The potential growth of NATO added to a mounting list of setbacks for Mr. Putin. Russia’s military offensive in eastern Ukraine remains stalled, and The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington think tank, said in its latest assessment that the Ukrainians had now won the battle for Kharkiv.
An apartment that took a direct hit during heavy Russian bombardment in Kharkiv on Saturday.
© Finbarr O'Reilly for The New York TimesAn apartment that took a direct hit during heavy Russian bombardment in Kharkiv on Saturday.


Having failed in its initial campaign to take the Ukrainian capital and oust the government, the Kremlin can ill afford to accept another defeat in the east.

In an interview with Britain’s Sky News on Saturday, the country’s military intelligence chief, Major General Kyrylo Budanov, said the months ahead would be decisive.

“The breaking point will be in the second part of August,” he said. “Most of the active combat actions will have finished by the end of this year.”

But as Moscow’s forces around Kharkiv are driven back toward the Russian border, they are expected to fight hard to keep open critical supply routes running through the region. Russia also controls a wide swath of land across southeastern Ukraine, where it is increasingly fortifying its position. The military campaign, analysts say, will continue to devolve into a protracted slog characterized by heavy casualties on both sides and devastating long range bombardment.

Ukraine’s defense minister, Oleksii Reznikov, warned of “extremely tough weeks” ahead. “No one can say for sure how many of them there will be,” he said in a statement.

President Volodymyr Zelensky acknowledged that the fight to regain control of Russian-occupied territories would be long and hard, but he vowed that they would not be abandoned.

“The gradual liberation of the Kharkiv region proves that we will not leave anyone to the enemy,” he said.
The impact of the battlefield clashes continue to ripple around the world.

The war has interrupted wheat production in Ukraine and Russia, both major suppliers, while fighting and naval blockades in the Black Sea have disrupted transport of the grain. And poor harvests in China, along with a heat wave in India and drought in other countries, have further snarled global supply.

But India, the world’s second-largest wheat producer, says it is banning exports with some exceptions, a move that could compound a worldwide shortfall worsened by the war in Ukraine and deepen an already dire forecast for hunger across the globe.

India has about 10 percent of the world’s grain reserves, according to data from the United States Department of Agriculture, a large surplus resulting from its heavy subsidizing of its farmers. It has been seen for months as a country that could help make up for global supply shortages.

“Russia’s war of aggression has generated one of the most severe food and energy crises in recent history,” the leaders of the world’s wealthiest democracies, the Group of 7, said in a statement on Saturday, adding that the problem “now threatens those most vulnerable across the globe.”


Reporting was contributed by Carlotta Gall from Kharkiv, Ukraine; Marc Santora from Krakow, Poland; Steven Erlanger from Tallinn, Estonia; Matthew Mpoke Bigg and Cassandra Vinograd from London; Emily Cochrane from Washington; and Sameer Yasir from New Delhi.


For Putin, a Nordic Nightmare Is Springing to Life (msn.com)
 
Back
Top