GOP’s ACORN Moment

thoughtone

Rising Star
Registered
source: Salon

A Republican consulting firm allegedly commits voter registration fraud. Where's the right-wing outrage this time?


Lida Bonilla casts her vote during the Florida Primary elections in Hialeah, Fla., Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2012. (Credit: AP/Alan Diaz)

There are still plenty of conservatives who think ACORN stole the 2008 election for Obama and will do it again this year. ACORN was everywhere four years ago. Even John McCain, late in his campaign and desperate to land a blow on Obama, ran an ad tying his challenger to the community-organizing group before saying in the final debate that ACORN “is now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy.” How did ACORN steal the election? A number of the group’s paid canvassers had been caught submitting false voter registration forms in a handful of states, using the names of dead people or false addresses, in order to avoid working.

Four years later, ACORN is dead, and a Republican firm contracted by the Republican National Committee has adopted its shady tactics. But, so far at least, there’s been hardly a peep from the same conservatives who seized on ACORN about one of their own engaging in almost identical fraudulent tactics.

Prosecutors in Florida are looking into alleged voter registration fraud conducted by employees of Strategic Allied Consulting, which the RNC and state parties hired in at least five states. The RNC has now cut ties with the firm after news broke that its employees had registered dead people and listed the addresses of a Land Rover dealership and other non-residences on registration forms. Paul Lux, the Republican supervisor of elections in Okaloosa County, Fla., who first brought the suspect registration forms to the attention of prosecutors, said as many as one in three were questionable. “It’s kind of ironic that the dead people they accused ACORN of registering are now being done by the RPOF [Republican Party of Florida],” Lux said.

Of the myriad conspiracy theories about Obama, the ACORN one had perhaps the most truth to it, though that’s a low bar. Some ACORN canvassers did, in fact, submit fraudulent voter registration forms, but there’s no evidence that anyone committed actual voter fraud nor that it was part of any kind of concerted effort to sway the election. ACORN noted it had 13,000 paid canvassers and that it was only a tiny handful who submitted phony forms. As the Republican prosecuting attorney said in King County, Wash., where the largest ACORN registration fraud suit took place, “[A] joint federal and state investigation has determined that this scheme was not intended to permit illegal voting. Instead, the defendants cheated their employer … to get paid for work they did not actually perform.”

For this, the group was killed. Tea Party groups organized rallies, local authorities squeezed the group, and Congress even introduced and passed a bill in 2009 called the “Defund ACORN Act.” The group, which suffered from other significant legal and financial issues, is now defunct. But in that time, ACORN became a top-tier villain of the right, mentioned hundreds of times in 2008 and 2009 by conservative media figures tracked by Media Matters. In later 2009, the pollster PPP asked respondents, “Do you think that Barack Obama legitimately won the Presidential election last year, or do you think that ACORN stole it for him?” Among Republicans, only 27 percent said Obama actually won the race — 52 percent said that ACORN stole it. Even some GOP congressional candidates blamed their losses on ACORN.

Should we expect the same kind of outrage from the right over the RNC’s contracting of a firm that did essentially the same thing as ACORN, and maybe even more? Don’t hold your breath.

Beyond Florida, Strategic Allied Consulting has been hired to register GOP voters in Nevada, North Carolina, Colorado and Virginia. Indeed, it was the the only firm hired by the RNC for voter registration, according to a spokesperson. At least one other election official in Florida has found suspect registration forms, and it’s too early to tell if the firm’s work in other states may be compromised as well.

But it’s not like the party had no warning. Nathan Sproul, the consultant who runs Strategic Allied Consulting and a handful of other companies, has a long history of dabbling in the political dark arts and has received copious public criticism for it. As Brad Friedman notes, Sproul’s antics have included everything from gathering signatures to put Ralph Nader on the ballot in 2000 to being banned from Wal-Mart for putting on partisan voting drives. In 2004, workers hired by Sproul said supervisors disposed of registration forms completed by Democrats. “They were thrown away in the trash,” an employee said. Canvassers are allowed to “pre-screen” people for party affiliation, but cannot dispose of an already completed voter registration form. That year, Sens. Patrick Leahy and Ted Kennedy sent a letter requesting that the Justice Department investigate the allegations, but the Bush DoJ did nothing.

In fact, as the Nation’s Lee Fang notes, “As Congress and ethics experts loudly called for investigations into Sproul’s voter suppression, the Bush administration literally welcomed Sproul and his wife into the White House for a Christmas party in 2006.” Even after all this, Sproul was hired by the Romney campaign to collect signatures during the GOP primary.

So far, there’s been literally zero mention on leading conservative blogs and media outlets. While it’s been less than 24 hours since news that the RNC had dropped the firm broke, considering the breathless way these outlets have covered voter fraud schemes involving Democrats, one would expect at least a mention. But a search on Strategic Allied Consulting or Nathan Sproul turns up zero results on the Weekly Standard, the National Review, RedState, the Breitbart sites, Michelle Malkin, Hot Air and other leading conservative blogs that have written about voter fraud. Fox News has also been silent on the issue, according to a transcript search.

In reality, the Strategic Allied Consulting’s improprieties will likely have about as much effect as ACORN’s voter registration fraud did on the election — almost none. But it should at least complicate the conservative narrative about voter fraud, which not only vastly overestimates the amount of in-person voter fraud that occurs in the U.S. (in reality, there is almost none), but it also assumes that the fraud that does occur is to benefit Democrats.

And it’s worth noting that the favored response to (supposed) voter problems from conservatives, voter ID laws, would have done nothing to stop this case, as most proposed laws require an ID only to vote, not to register. We already knew that the ACORN allegations were more about politics than substance, but the lesson from this case, if there is one, is that fraud is rare, both sides are capable of it, and potentially disenfranchising millions of voters with new ID laws to deal with it doesn’t make any sense.
 
Re: Voter Suppression

source: New York Times

G.O.P. Operative Long Trailed by Allegations of Voter Fraud</NYT_HEADLINE>

05sproul-articleInline.jpg

The authorities in Florida are reviewing “numerous” complaints about voter registration efforts by a company run by Nathan Sproul, shown in 2004.

In a provocative article on CNN’s Web site, the committee’s chairman, Reince Priebus, said, “Democrats know they benefit from election fraud.”

The tables have turned, however, and Republicans are now playing defense over the role of a well-paid operative, Nathan Sproul, in a voter registration scandal that emerged in Florida and has spread to other states.

The Florida Department of Law Enforcement said it was reviewing “numerous” claims involving a company that Mr. Sproul runs to determine if a criminal investigation is warranted. Complaints have surfaced in 10 Florida counties, among them allegations that registrations had similar signatures or false addresses, or were filed under the names of dead people. In other cases, party affiliations appeared to have been changed.

In recent days, similar claims against Mr. Sproul have arisen in Nevada and Colorado.

Mr. Sproul, 40, a former executive director of the Arizona Christian Coalition and the Republican Party in Arizona, is well known in political circles there. Since 2004, Mr. Sproul’s companies — he has operated under several corporate names — have collected more than $17.6 million from Republican committees, candidates and the “super PAC” American Crossroads, mostly for voter registration operations, according to campaign finance records.

The Republican Party, which paid Mr. Sproul about $3 million this year for work in five states, has severed its ties with him, saying it has no tolerance for voter registration fraud.

But questions about Mr. Sproul’s methods first emerged in 2004, when one of his companies, Sproul & Associates, was paid nearly $8 million during the election cycle. The payouts made the company the seventh-biggest recipient of campaign expenditures by the committee, according to an analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Mr. Sproul declined to be interviewed.

In a statement issued by his lawyer, Mr. Sproul said the huge size of his voter operation — he claims to have registered more than 500,000 people in more than 40 states through election cycles — would invariably lead to a few problems. “Inevitably, there have been accusations of ‘bad registrations,’ isolated instances that have been thoroughly investigated not only internally but by the appropriate legal authorities,” the statement said.

Mike Hellon, a former chairman of the Arizona Republican Party, said that Mr. Sproul had been considered “very controversial” in Arizona Republican circles before the recent allegations, partly because of past voter registration investigations. “There are questions among a lot of people in the party about how he gets these contracts and why he gets contracts,” Mr. Hellon said.

As a political operative in Arizona, Mr. Sproul is known for a no-holds-barred approach. He was criticized for dredging up 28-year-old domestic abuse claims against an incumbent State Senate candidate in 2008.

That same year, he promoted a ballot initiative that would have made it more difficult to impose additional taxes or increase spending in the state. The measure failed, despite considerable financial backing from the liquor industry and from Jim Click, a Tucson car dealer and a large Republican donor who has worked closely with Mr. Sproul on local elections.

On a campaign trip to Arizona last year, Mitt Romney visited one of Mr. Click’s auto dealerships. Mr. Click is a co-chairman of Mr. Romney’s campaign in Arizona. Mr. Sproul has also worked for the campaign, receiving about $60,000 since last year, according to campaign finance records. A spokesman for the campaign said that Mr. Sproul collected petition signatures during the Republican primary elections and provided office space.

Mr. Click said that while he had worked with Mr. Sproul on campaigns and thought highly of him, he had nothing to do with securing his recent contracts with the Republican National Committee. “He’s always performed for me,” Mr. Click said. “He’s always been aboveboard.”

Mr. Sproul is one of the biggest players in a for-profit industry that relies on low-paid seasonal workers who must be quickly trained in the legalities of voter registration. In addition to $12 an hour, workers might be eligible for college internship credit, the ad said.

Mr. Sproul has said that his company employs 4,000 workers. “We have in place a background check system and stringent quality controls meant to prevent individuals from skirting the system,” said the statement released by his lawyer, David Leibowitz.

Mr. Sproul runs at least five affiliated companies that have conducted registration drives, polling and political consulting. According to a lawsuit filed against him by a former employee over pay, Mr. Sproul changed his company’s name in 2008 to Lincoln Strategy Group, from Sproul & Associates, after the negative publicity.

More recently, Mr. Sproul has operated under the name Strategic Allied Consulting.

Susan Bucher, the superintendent of elections in Palm Beach County, Fla., said that about 100 questionable voter registrations had been flagged there. Of those, more than half involved changing a voter’s party affiliation to Republican or independent. Ms. Bucher said that the revised registrations gave her “the feeling that the person completing the application had not come in contact with the voter,” because they failed to include proper identifying information, like the last four digits of the voter’s Social Security number.

The voter registration fraud allegations against Mr. Sproul’s companies seem to fit a pattern.

In Nevada, a complaint filed last month with the secretary of state’s office alleged that a woman, Cathy Sue Yancey, was told to tear up a form in which she registered as a Democrat and fill out another one without marking her party affiliation.

The complaint was filed by another woman who said she witnessed the event outside an unemployment office in Henderson, Nev., on Sept. 13. That woman, Gina Greisen, said she and a group of friends had been approached by a man who told them that they needed to update their voter registration. “He talked about voter fraud and mentioned Acorn and illegals voting,” Ms. Greisen said.

The worker then approached Ms. Yancey. “He was sure a Republican, because he was totally against Obama,” said Ms. Yancey, who was reached by phone and verified Ms. Greisen’s account. “I’m a Democrat. I’m certainly voting for Obama.”

The election forms were traced to a Sproul operation. Similar allegations prompted an investigation by the Oregon Department of Justice in 2004.

In that case, a couple told the police in Roseburg that they had been approached by a woman outside a Walmart who asked them to register to vote. The husband, John Gomez, filled out a card registering as a Republican. His wife, Katheline, registered as a Democrat.

About a month later, Mr. Gomez received a ballot in the mail, but his wife did not, the Oregon authorities said. Her registration form seemed to have evaporated. Investigators determined that the woman who solicited the couple had been paid by Sproul & Associates.

The woman told investigators that she was paid only when she registered Republicans or those who said they would vote for President George W. Bush. The Oregon inquiry focused on more than 100 fraud complaints, many pointing to operations run by Mr. Sproul, but did not result in any charges. A lawyer for Mr. Sproul said at the time that the company had a system in place to prevent and detect fraud and forgery.

Additional investigations of Mr. Sproul’s organization, including one by the Portland office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, also failed to produce any charges.

Around the same time, officials at a library in Pittsburgh complained that Mr. Sproul’s company had used false pretenses — claiming to represent the nonpartisan America Votes — to get permission to set up a voter registration desk outside their building. It was only after visitors began to complain that the library learned that the canvassers represented the Republican Party.
 
Re: Voter Suppression

Wasn't Gunner all over ACORN?


<iframe src="http://current.com/bc/1867197417001?linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fcurrent.com%2Fshows%2Fthe-war-room%2Fvideos%2Ftwr20120928-fang" width="480" height="270" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
 
Back
Top