for the ladies: Treat her like a Prostitute

Champiooon

Support BGOL
Registered
What's Good ladies, there's a new organization that is trying to rid women of color of the stereotypes that penetrate them in the media. I believe they are a subdivision of Russell Simmons Hip Hop Summit Action Network. Here's a piece I found on there:

Treat Her Like A Prostitute

Think of North Philadelphia, think of the abandoned row homes; already I can see the drug addicts standing around outside waiting for their daily fix. The cops aren’t paying much attention to this block; this is a typical block in the heart of North Philly where abandoned homes stand in desolate neighborhoods; a criminal’s safe haven. Inside this fateful house a young woman is being RAPED, she is being forced to have sex with four men at gunpoint. On this lonely block I can see this sister fearing for her life, while in this house these men are beating her and taking her womanhood from her forcefully. Wait……. This story is biased, did I mention our victim is a prostitute! Does that matter? Or, because she is a prostitute is this merely an occupational hazard? Let’s take away our moral judgment and rely solely on the law, which is meant to protect the citizens of this country. Well according to a judge in Philadelphia, a woman who was raped in late September in North Philadelphia experienced such an occupational hazard. Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmm…


So what type of messages are we sending, I remember hearing NO MEANS NO! Rape victims are already not supported by the criminal justice system, which is why so many sexual assaults go unreported every year. Moreover, essentially what the courts are saying is that if you are a prostitute then you are not a credible citizen and your rights can be violated because you put yourself in that situation.


I am not here to defend prostitution as a viable means of income but I am concerned with how people are treated in this country. Now to give the whole story without any bias I will give you the information provided to me by the local newspaper. As the story goes the woman was actually working as a prostitute, she charged two men $200 to have sex with them. They refused to pay her, and here is where this story gets ugly, a gun then comes out and two more men rape the woman. The 5th man saw this woman crying and decided to help her get dressed so that she could leave the house without further harassment from the other individuals. Unfortunately, the judge said that she would not waste her time on such a case because there are real rape victims out there. Again I ask does No not mean No? I mean I’m just curious, or are we letting our moral judgments affect who the law will protect and whom it will dismiss as this poor young woman was dismissed in Philadelphia.

It’s very interesting how we vilify the media, hip-hop, movies and all other proponents of misogyny when it comes to the mis-representation and treatment of women. However, here is our sacred criminal justice system picking and choosing who deserves to be protected under the law and who does not. I just wonder is this a sign of things to come, a woman has one to many drinks, she’s forced to sleep with several men and the argument goes something like this; “well she’s normally a very promiscuous girl, she had on a short skirt, or the infamous, she wanted it”!


It’s our time to stand up and have our voices heard if only to protect our sisters, cousins and mothers and ourselves in the future. If we are outraged by the way our sisters are treated in the media we should be just as outraged at how our sisters are being victimized by the criminal justice system. It is not ok for a man or a group of men to maliciously rape our women no matter what their occupation is. If we continue to allow this type of behavior to persist than we will continue to get the same results that depict our women as sexual objects who are not deserving of respect. We have allowed the media to say this for long enough, now it has spilled over into the law of our land. We can not allow our women and their presence to be belittled, lets fight to preserve their image and their constitutional right as human beings that deserve the right to be protected in this country. Let’s Make It Happen!
 
What's Good ladies, there's a new organization that is trying to rid women of color of the stereotypes that penetrate them in the media. I believe they are a subdivision of Russell Simmons Hip Hop Summit Action Network. Here's a piece I found on there:

Treat Her Like A Prostitute

Think of North Philadelphia, think of the abandoned row homes; already I can see the drug addicts standing around outside waiting for their daily fix. The cops aren’t paying much attention to this block; this is a typical block in the heart of North Philly where abandoned homes stand in desolate neighborhoods; a criminal’s safe haven. Inside this fateful house a young woman is being RAPED, she is being forced to have sex with four men at gunpoint. On this lonely block I can see this sister fearing for her life, while in this house these men are beating her and taking her womanhood from her forcefully. Wait……. This story is biased, did I mention our victim is a prostitute! Does that matter? Or, because she is a prostitute is this merely an occupational hazard? Let’s take away our moral judgment and rely solely on the law, which is meant to protect the citizens of this country. Well according to a judge in Philadelphia, a woman who was raped in late September in North Philadelphia experienced such an occupational hazard. Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmm…


So what type of messages are we sending, I remember hearing NO MEANS NO! Rape victims are already not supported by the criminal justice system, which is why so many sexual assaults go unreported every year. Moreover, essentially what the courts are saying is that if you are a prostitute then you are not a credible citizen and your rights can be violated because you put yourself in that situation.


I am not here to defend prostitution as a viable means of income but I am concerned with how people are treated in this country. Now to give the whole story without any bias I will give you the information provided to me by the local newspaper. As the story goes the woman was actually working as a prostitute, she charged two men $200 to have sex with them. They refused to pay her, and here is where this story gets ugly, a gun then comes out and two more men rape the woman. The 5th man saw this woman crying and decided to help her get dressed so that she could leave the house without further harassment from the other individuals. Unfortunately, the judge said that she would not waste her time on such a case because there are real rape victims out there. Again I ask does No not mean No? I mean I’m just curious, or are we letting our moral judgments affect who the law will protect and whom it will dismiss as this poor young woman was dismissed in Philadelphia.

It’s very interesting how we vilify the media, hip-hop, movies and all other proponents of misogyny when it comes to the mis-representation and treatment of women. However, here is our sacred criminal justice system picking and choosing who deserves to be protected under the law and who does not. I just wonder is this a sign of things to come, a woman has one to many drinks, she’s forced to sleep with several men and the argument goes something like this; “well she’s normally a very promiscuous girl, she had on a short skirt, or the infamous, she wanted it”!


It’s our time to stand up and have our voices heard if only to protect our sisters, cousins and mothers and ourselves in the future. If we are outraged by the way our sisters are treated in the media we should be just as outraged at how our sisters are being victimized by the criminal justice system. It is not ok for a man or a group of men to maliciously rape our women no matter what their occupation is. If we continue to allow this type of behavior to persist than we will continue to get the same results that depict our women as sexual objects who are not deserving of respect. We have allowed the media to say this for long enough, now it has spilled over into the law of our land. We can not allow our women and their presence to be belittled, lets fight to preserve their image and their constitutional right as human beings that deserve the right to be protected in this country. Let’s Make It Happen!



The girl listed her "services" on Craigslist. The judge had the nerve not the charge the guys with rape but "theft of services"!! The Philadelphia Daily news reporter was outraged. I wrote the reporter to vent as many people did. Here's the full story!!

Jill Porter | Hooker raped and robbed - by justice system?
Philadelphia Daily News

A DEFENDANT accused of forcing a prostitute at gunpoint to have sex with him and three other men got lucky, so to speak, last week.
A Philadelphia judge dropped all sex and assault charges at his preliminary hearing.

Municipal Judge Teresa Carr Deni instead held the defendant on the bizarre charge of armed robbery for - get this - "theft of services."

Unbelievable.

Deni told me she based her decision on the fact that the prostitute consented to have sex with the defendant.

"She consented and she didn't get paid . . . I thought it was a robbery."

The prostitute, a 20-year-old single mother, agreed to $150 for an hour of oral and vaginal sex on Sept. 20, according to assistant district attorney Rich DeSipio. The arrangements were made through her posting on Craigslist.

She met the defendant, Dominique Gindraw, 19, at what she thought was his house, but which turned out to be an abandoned property in North Philadelphia.

He asked if she'd have sex with his friend, too, and she agreed for another $100.

The friend showed up without money, the gun was pulled and more men arrived.

When a fifth man arrived and was invited to join, DeSipio said, he asked why the girl was crying - and declined. He helped her get dressed so she could leave.

It's true the prostitute negotiated sex with the defendant - but not unprotected gang sex at gunpoint.

"The Legislature has defined sex by force as rape," said DeSipio, accusing the judge of "rewriting her own laws."

DeSipio said Judge Deni's ruling was based, not on the law, but on moral contempt.

"Certainly if a jury wants to make that judgment, they're entitled to. But for a judge to make a judgment on a human being - I've never seen that before."

Deni did seem contemptuous of the victim:

"Did she tell you she had another client before she went to report it?" Deni asked me yesterday when we met at a coffee shop.

"I thought rape was a terrible trauma."

A case like this, she said - to my astonishment - "minimizes true rape cases and demeans women who are really raped."

The defendant was charged in an identical incident involving a 23-year-old woman four days later, DeSipio said.

Neither woman knew the other and both told identical stories. The other men involved in the attack couldn't be identified.

DeSipio was so stunned by Deni's ruling in the first case that he refused to present the second one.

"I wouldn't demean her that way," he said of the second victim, calling the proceedings "a farce."

Judge Deni then threw out the second case for failure to prosecute.

Police Detective Jack Ryan, who investigated the incidents, said the victims in the two cases "were in fear for their lives. Since they saw one of the doers really well, it crossed both of their minds that they'd be killed."

Deni's decision to drop the sex charges is " frankly, appalling," he said.

Deni acknowledged that her ruling and remarks would be controversial.

"I know I'm going to get killed on this."

But she said she has to "sleep at night with what I decide."

And on the night of Oct. 4, when she ruled in the preliminary hearing of this case?

"I slept well."

Certainly the victims don't inspire much sympathy.

Why waste taxpayers' money for what some people consider an occupational hazard?

There are enough sympathetic victims without wasting time on prostitutes who ask for trouble, right?

But crimes are prosecuted not out of sympathy for victims, but to maintain the rule of law in a civilized society, to punish a criminal and prevent further crime.

I like Deni, but reducing rape to theft of services?

It's an insult. And it's more evidence of the skepticism and contempt most rape victims - prostitutes or not - confront when they seek justice in court.

DeSipio said he'll file to reinstate the charges in both cases right away - before a different judge, of course.

Hopefully, the next judge will be better able to differentiate between a violated business agreement and a violent attack. *

E-mail porterj@phillynews.com or call 215-854-5850. For recent columns:

http://go.philly.com/porter
http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/10497662.html
 
I'm completely floored by this article ... this proves my point that the justice system ain't shit ... that judge represents so many judgemental people in this world who want to do nothing more than kick you while you're down to make their pathetic lives look better ... she based her decision on her own feelings on the situation probably because her husband goes to prostitues to get off cuz she's so lame in bed ... that's probably why she's hating ... I mean who really are the ones paying for that pussy ... it's not people like you and I ... usually it's those highty tighty business men who need a break from their corny, up tight, frigid wives ... I mean I may not necessarily agree with prostituation but you gotta look at the bigger picture ... we don't know what has happened to this woman to make her turn to that kind of life so we shouldn't judge her based on one nights events ... and more importantly NO MEANS NO no matter who it's coming from:smh:But she should have known better than to go to the cops cuz anybody with eyes and ears can see how the justice system clowns rape victims ... I woulda went home for something and dealt with homie on my own ... straight up
 
yea we have to attack these types of disparities within our system..... sadly alot of women read that peace and sympathize with the judge, passing judgment on the woman. Sad:smh:
 
aww man this was a heated debate in undegrad


point blank simple no means no

a prostitute can get raped, and so can a wife by her husband and vice versa


anyway....if anything i think that they should have been charged BOTH w/ rape and theft of services because of her marketing her sexuality as a commodity
 
aww man this was a heated debate in undegrad


point blank simple no means no

a prostitute can get raped, and so can a wife by her husband and vice versa


anyway....if anything i think that they should have been charged BOTH w/ rape and theft of services because of her marketing her sexuality as a commodity

I was thinking the same thing.

I'm going to be an asshole about this one though, why worry about a whore who gets raped? If she was really concerned about what went in her pussy, she wouldn't be advertising her pussy on craigslist. She went into an abandoned building, AND agreed to let the 2nd guy fuck. Any ho with brains (oxymoron) will tell you that's a dumb move.

Personally, I think that rape should carry a death sentence. Because the woman ends up getting scarred for life, and it can affect anyone around her (i.e. husband, kids).

The judge was a retard tho, i'm surprised that a woman judge made that ruling. She should have charged them; if they did it once, they'll do it again.
 
Back
Top