February--Black History Month....Still 'Relevant'???

The Question of Relevancy.


  • Total voters
    10

flounder

Potential Star
Registered
Initially, the 'celebrated' occasion ( recognition of achievements by Blacks in America), created by Dr. Charles Woodson, History professor at Howard U. The event lasted for one-week in February, 1926. and was later extended to a full month in 1976. He was also a member of the Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc., whose sway help the extention of a full month for "Black History".

Dr. Woodson choose the month of February as appropriate a/c of the birth month of Abe Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. Two giants of historical influence for African-Americans during a critical time.

Over the last decade-or so, its 'relevancy' has been debated. Does the concept of Black History--which in essence is American History--still serve a useful purpose. If so, what?We are a different society, Country, today. This is no longer 1926. How do you feel?
 
I think you should add another choice bruh

" Is Black History Month still relevant "


and I would say yes it is
 
I think you should add another choice bruh

" Is Black History Month still relevant "


and I would say yes it is

C/S
its most certainly is.. and should get alot more Respect and Attention..! Today it seems as though the youth, don't get or value the true meaning and significance of it...and therefor don't respect the struggles, sacrifices, and contributions made by all those who came before us..!
 
Ever relevant is a better question. Every black gangbanger that's alive right now got his fair share of Black History Month whenever they were in school. In itself, what did it accomplish?
 
Still can't comprehend non-groupthink-ese huh?

Ever relevant is a better question. <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">Every black gangbanger that's alive right now got his fair share of Black History Month whenever they were in school.</SPAN> In itself, what did it accomplish?

Because I have a difference in opinion about this situation?

Oh let me guess, I have to do exactly what other posters do on here. Lick Obama's balls to sound educated. <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">Thanks for proving my point about overemotional black folks and Obama.</SPAN>

3. Of all things, being a conservative is like saying your a racist,sexist, ect. Think about it,<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00"> Black America has been taught to think that GOP is the RACIST PARTY.</SPAN> Thus, why you say the bullshit you SAY.

I just amazed at how so called "Black" conservatives interject race, particularly self hating race in to everything.

I am noticing a disturbing self haltered trend among so called “Black” conservative republicans. Either victimization or emphasizing stereotypes that are rampant in the so called liberal media about “Black” folks.
 
I had intended to add 2 pieces from the BLACK PRESS USA,
however, its somehow got passed me. Nevertheless, even
though month has passed, the question of its relevance still
lingers, hence, the next two posts.
 
<font size="5"><center>
National African-American History Month, 2009 </font size></center>



Black Press USA
by Barack Obama
NNPA Special Commentary
fEBRUARY 2009


The history of African-Americans is unique and rich, and one that has helped to define what it means to be an American. Arriving on ships on the shores of North America more than 300 years ago, recognized more as possessions than people, African- Americans have come to know the freedoms fought for in establishing the United States and gained through the use of our founding principles of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assembly, and due process of law.

The ideals of the Founders became more real and more true for every citizen as African-Americans pressed us to realize our full potential as a Nation and to uphold those ideals for all who enter into our borders and embrace the notion that we are all endowed with certain unalienable rights.

Since Carter G. Woodson first sought to illuminate the African-American experience, each February we pause to reflect on the contributions of this community to our national identity.

The history is one of struggle for the recognition of each person's humanity as well as an influence on the broader American culture. African-Americans designed our beautiful Capital City, gave us the melodic rhythms of New Orleans Jazz, issued new discoveries in science and medicine, and forced us to examine ourselves in the pages of classic literature. This legacy has only added luster to the brand of the United States, which has drawn immigrants to our shores for centuries.

This year's theme, ''The Quest for Black Citizenship in the Americas,'' is a chance to examine the evolution of our country and how African-Americans helped draw us ever closer to becoming a more perfect union.

The narrative of the African-American pursuit of full citizenship with all of the rights and privileges afforded others in this country is also the story of a maturing young Nation. The voices and examples of the African- American people worked collectively to remove the boulders of systemic racism and discrimination that pervaded our laws and our public consciousness for decades.

Through the work of Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman, Booker T. Washington and George Washington Carver, Martin Luther King and Thurgood Marshall, the African- American community has steadily made progress toward the dreams within its grasp and the promise of our more Nation.

Meanwhile, the belief that those dreams might one day be realized by all of our citizens gave African- American men and women the same sense of duty and love of country that led them to shed blood in every war we have ever fought, to invest hard-earned resources in their communities with the hope of self empowerment, and to pass the ideals of this great land down to their children and grandchildren.

As we mark National African-American History Month, we should take note of this special moment in our Nation's history and the actors who worked so diligently to deliver us to this place. One such organization is the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People - the NAACP - which this year will witness 100 years of service to the Nation on February 12.

Because of their work, including the contributions of those luminaries on the front lines and great advocates behind the scenes, we as a Nation were able to take the dramatic steps we have in recent history.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim February 2009 as National African-American History Month.

I call upon public officials, educators, librarians, and all the people of the United States to observe this month with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs that raise awareness and appreciation of African-American history.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

http://www.blackpressusa.com/Op-Ed/Speaker.asp?NewsID=17806
 
<font size="5"><center>
Preserving Black History Month</font size></center>



Black Press USA
by George E. Curry
February 18, 2009


<font size="4"><SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">The clamor to get rid of Black History Month ignores a crucial yet often overlooked fact: Congress has authorized and every president – Democrat and Republican – signs an executive order each year honoring the contributions of not only African-Americans, but Latinos, Asians, Native Americans and women.</font size></span>

February is Black History Month, March has been designated Women’s History Month, May is Asian Pacific American Heritage Month, Hispanic Heritage Month begins on September 15 and November is observed as American Indian Heritage Month.

Therefore, to single out the elimination of Black History Month while continuing the other observations is ludicrous. To recommend that all be eliminated is equally foolish. As the nation grows increasingly diverse – by the year 2040, Whites will become a minority in the U.S. – I offer a different proposal. Instead of eliminating designated national observations such as Black History Month, let’s make an effort to learn more about the groups being celebrated at different times throughout the year.

The sad truth is that many groups do not have a sufficient knowledge of their own history and even less information about what other groups have endured and accomplished. This is a good time to change that. A knowledge and appreciation for other cultures might foster better intergroup relationships.
Why do we celebrate Black History Month in February?

No, it’s not because it’s the shortest month of the year. Black history was initially observed the second week in February. Carter G. Woodson, the founder of what was then called Negro History Week, first chose the week in 1926 because it marked the birthdays of abolitionist Frederick Douglass (February 14, 1818) and Abraham Lincoln, the signer of the Emancipation Proclamation (February 12, 1809).

It was natural to expand the second week in February to the month that also contained the birthday of scholar and civil rights icon W.B. B. DuBois (February 23, 1868), marked the passage of the 15th Amendment granting Blacks the right to vote (February 3, 1870), represented the day that the first Black U.S. Senator, Hiram R. Revels of Mississippi, took his oath of office (February 25, 1870) and the day the NAACP was founded (February 12, 1909). Additionally, the Greensboro, N.C. sit-in movement began February 1, 1960 and Malcolm X was slain February 21, 1965.

Women’s History Month also began as a week-long celebration. It was first observed in 1978 by Sonoma County, California. The second week in March was selected to include the March 8 observance of International Women’s Day. In 1981, Representative Barbara Mikulski of Maryland and Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah co-sponsored a joint Congressional resolution proclaiming national Women’s History Week. In 1987, the week was expanded to a month.

In June 1977, Representatives Frank Horton of New York and Norman Y. Mineta of California introduced a House resolution that called on the president to designate the first 10 days of May as Asian Pacific Heritage Week. The following month, a similar bill was introduced in the Senate by Daniel Inouye and Spark Matsunaga. On October 5, 1978, President Jimmy Carter signed the joint resolution for the annual celebration. In May 1990, it was expanded into a month. May was chosen to commemorate the official arrival of Japanese immigrants on May 7, 1843 and the completion of the transcontinental railroad on May 10, 1869. Chinese immigrants laid the majority of the tracks.

Hispanic Heritage Month begins on September 15, the anniversary of independence for five Latin American countries – Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua. They all declared their independence in 1821. In addition, Mexico celebrates its independence on September 16 and Chile on September 18.

October 12, observed as Columbus Day or Dia de la Razza, also falls within the 30-day period. The celebration began in 1968 as Hispanic Heritage Week under President Lyndon B. Johnson and expanded in 1988 by President Ronald Reagan to cover September 15 to October 15. Many Americans mistake Cinco de Mayo with Mexican Independence Day. The former, observed May 5, celebrates Mexico’s victory over the French Empire at the Battle of Puebla, about 100 miles east of Mexico City, in 1862.

The first American Indian Day was declared on the second Saturday in May 1916 by the governor of New York. Several states set aside the fourth Friday in September to celebrate the cultures and contributions of Native Americans. Several other states have designated Columbus Day as Native American Day.

Though November is now designated as American Indian Heritage Month, earlier efforts to honor the contributions of Native Americans have been inconsistent. In 1986, Congress requested that the president proclaim the week of November 23-30 as American Indian Week. In 1988, Congress changed the designation to National American Indian Heritage Week and moved the date of the observance to September 23-30 because “the last week of September begins the harvest season in the United States.” In 1989, Congress switched the week to December 3-9. In 1990, Congress requested the president to issue a proclamation designating the month of November 1990 as National American Indian Heritage Month.

Congress said it selected November because it concludes the traditional harvest season and is a time of thanksgiving and celebration of American Indians.

As can be seen above, we know so little about one another. Instead of eliminating celebrations such as Black History Month, we should broaden the celebrations so that we’ll know more about ourselves and one another.

George E. Curry, former editor-in-chief of Emerge magazine and the NNPA News Service, is a keynote speaker, moderator, and media coach. He can be reached through his Web site, www.georgecurry.com.


http://www.blackpressusa.com/Op-Ed/Speaker.asp?NewsID=17876
 
Black History Month--black and right-

<object width="450" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.liveleak.com/e/f9c_1264792615"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/f9c_1264792615" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370"></embed></object>
Bob Parks is a member/writer for the National Advisory Council of Project 21; Senior Writer, New Media Journal; VP of Marketing and Media Relations/Senior Writer, New Media Alliance; former VP, Massachusetts Republican Assembly; Executive Director, NMATV
Connect with NMA2


Black & Right (Link)
 
<font size="5"><center>
Is Black History Month Relevant?</font size></center>



By Nadra Kareem
About. com Guide
February 15, 2010


Ask older African Americans if the contributions of blacks were highlighted in textbooks, school curricula or the nightly news when they were growing up, and the answer you'll likely hear is a resounding no. For centuries, the role that blacks, not to mention Hispanics, Native Americans and Asian Americans, played in shaping American society was left out of history books. To counteract this problem, historian Carter G. Woodson campaigned for what was known in 1926 as Negro History Week. Later, this week morphed into Black History Month, a time for the nation to recognize the major milestones and key figures in African-American history. But in today's society, where blacks are widely represented in U.S. government, popular culture, literature and elsewhere, the need for Black History Month has been called into question. Is Black History Month still relevant, or worse yet, is it racist? The benefits and drawbacks to celebrating black history may be more complex than you think.


<font size="4">The Argument for Black History Month</font size>

The United States is now headed by its first president of African descent. Moreover, blacks are widely represented in government, literature, film, athletics and other arenas. Given this, is it still necessary to set aside a month for the express purpose of celebrating the accomplishments of African Americans? Harvard University Professor Henry Louis Gates and writer Raina Kelley have both argued in Newsweek that Black History Month deserves to be celebrated, as it not only connects blacks to the struggles endured by forebears but also addresses the progress still to come in the black community.

"These sorts of gestures are necessary to reclaim the past," Gates explained in Newsweek. "Black History Month has been very effective in resurrecting the stories of our ancestors and in integrating those stories into our history. But we're not even on the horizon of the time to end Black History Month. When as many Americans are as familiar with Harriet Tubman as they are with Paul Revere, then we can talk about ending Black History Month."

Kelley noted that she understands why people, even African Americans, question the need for Black History Month, but stresses that the month can remain significant by highlighting the challenges facing black America at present.

"Rather than wasting time bemoaning the existence of Black History Month, why don't we use it to proselytize for the issues that need to be more fully covered and understood the other 337 days of the year-such as failing inner-city public schools, institutionalized poverty, health-care disparities, and job discrimination?" Kelley asks. "Black History Month is a measure of how fully or accurately our story is being told and a reminder of the work yet to be done."

When President Barack Obama proclaimed February 2010 African American History Month, he echoed some of the sentiments expressed by Kelley and Gates about why such a month should be acknowledged.

"Each February, we recognize African American History Month as a moment to reflect upon how far we have come as a nation, and what challenges remain," he remarked. "…In the volumes of black history, much remains unwritten. Let us add our own chapter, full of progress and ambition, so that our children's children will know that we, too, did our part to erase an unjust past and build a brighter future."

The White House makes the celebration of Black History Month relevant by adopting a different theme for the month each year. For instance, the theme for 2010 is "The History of Black Economic Empowerment." Such a theme encourages Americans to look back at how African Americans became entrepreneurs and skilled workers in spite of virulent racism, while pointing out how blacks can navigate the business and employment sectors today.

In his 2010 proclamation of African American History Month, President Obama pointed out how his administration aims to help blacks, and all Americans, by giving credits to small businesses, slashing tax breaks for companies that outsource work and giving breaks to companies that create jobs domestically.

"We are also reinvesting in our schools and making college more affordable, because a world class education is our country's best roadmap to prosperity," the President remarked.

If Black History Month is used as a platform to outline strategies to help the black community continue advancing, the 28-day celebration can remain relevant. And if the enormous challenges the black community has already confronted are spotlighted during Black History Month, African Americans may have faith that they can continue making progress. Despite potential benefits such as these, Black History Month continues to have its detractors.



<font size="4">The Argument Against Black History Month</font size>

Critics of Black History Month argue that the celebration is shallow, racist and "ghettoizes" black contributions to America in one 28-day period. For instance, Black History Month is a time when children learn about black inventors and pioneers such as Benjamin Banneker, an astronomer; or Madame C.J. Walker, the first self-made female millionaire. While those studying Black History Month are grilled on the names of African American pioneers, they receive little background on the historical context these heroes lived and prospered in despite deep-seated racism. Moreover, students learning about Black History Month may not understand the significance of Dr. Charles Drew reportedly inventing blood plasma. Without proper perspective, a student learning about Black History Month is armed with a list of names and inventions and little else.

Another reason Black History Month has come under fire is because some consider it to be racist. But is it? Perhaps Black History Month would be racist if its aim was to point out that blacks were superior to other groups. However, Black History Month functions to highlight the oft-overlooked accomplishments of African Americans. The reason there's no White History Month is because the accomplishments of whites and their contributions to society are showcased all year long. In short, Black History Month's goal is to raise awareness.

"Thus, it works in exactly the same way as Breast Cancer Awareness Month in October or Gay and Lesbian Pride Month in June," Kelley writes.

Some critics argue that Black History Month isn't racist because it singles out a particular racial group but because it seems to relegate celebration of African Americans to a mere 28 days. While Black History Month founder Carter G. Woodson designated February as a time to honor blacks (the month contains the birthdays of abolitionist Frederick Douglass and former President Abraham Lincoln, who signed the Emancipation Proclamation), he believed that the need to have such a month would one day prove unnecessary. He hoped that African Americans would be so thoroughly integrated into U.S. society that their contributions would no longer require singling out as the years passed.

Academy Award-winning actor Morgan Freeman has taken to task the fact that the U.S. still celebrates Black History Month. In a 2005 "60 Minutes" interview, Freeman called Black History Month ridiculous. "You're going to relegate my history to a month?" he asked. "I don't want a Black History Month. Black history is American history."

Historians such as the late Ronald Takaki and the late Howard Zinn tried to include the history of African Americans and other racial minority groups in their revisionist writings about American history. While the works of Takaki and Zinn are popular, especially in college courses, the standard history books continue to prominently feature whites while relegating racial minorities to the margins. Until the contributions of minority groups are the focal points of history books rather than footnotes, the need for Black History Month, Asian-Pacific American Heritage Month, National Hispanic Heritage Month and the like will remain strong.


http://racerelations.about.com/od/historyofracerelations/a/IsBlackHistoryMonthRelevant.htm
 


In today's society, where blacks are widely represented
in U.S. government, popular culture, literature and elsewhere,
the need for Black History Month has been called into question.
Is Black History Month still relevant,
or worse yet,
is it racist?

 
Not enough growth shown if you ask me

We have to many things that are set up to stunt growth in the black community.

These things are embraced and deeply embedded .

They mentally immobilize ----- in many ways and stir up the social climate
In the black community constantly to keep ------ disoriented.

If ----- stopped giving so much money to the church and find reliable ways
to get those funds into the community that's half the battle.

Many gave up long ago.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not enough growth shown if you ask me

We have to many things that are set up to stunt growth in the black community.

These things are embraced and deeply embedded .

They mentally immobilize ------ in many ways and stir up the social climate
In the black community constantly to keep ------ disoriented.

If ----- stopped giving so much money to the church and find reliable ways
to get those funds into the community that's half the battle.

Many gave up long ago.

Bro, we sincerely appreciate your contributions to this forum, however, the Rules of the Board prohibit the use of the "N" word and I do my best to enforce that rule.

Again, we appreciate and welcome your thoughts; and thank you in advance for your compliance.

Peace,

Qx
 
<IFRAME SRC="http://www.theroot.com/views/man-who-would-end-black-history-month?wpisrc=root_lightbox" WIDTH=760 HEIGHT=1400>
<A HREF="http://www.theroot.com/views/man-who-would-end-black-history-month?wpisrc=root_lightbox">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
When is celebrating and acknowledging ones history and culture not relevant?

Please name another ethnicity that questions the relevancy of their heritage.

Ironically, while some folks ponder this question there are tea-partiers more than willing to recast our history to their liking (haven't we been here before?).


:smh:
 
Back
Top