Facial recognition ERROR leads to arrest of sista...... that's visibly pregnant.... 8 MONTHS PREGANT..... FOR CAR JACKING AND ROBBERY

lightbright

Master Pussy Poster
BGOL Investor

Black mom sues city of Detroit claiming she was falsely arrested while 8 months pregnant by officers using facial

230807154058-porcha-woodruff.jpg

Porcha Woodruff's lawsuit is the latest to zero in on facial recognition technology and its potential risks.

Police Department detective after she was falsely arrested while eight months pregnant by officers using “an unreliable facial recognition match,” a federal lawsuit filed Thursday says.

Porcha Woodruff, 32, was home around 8 a.m. on February 16, helping her 6- and 12-year-olds get ready for school when six Detroit police officers arrived at her door with an arrest warrant for carjacking and robbery, the complaint states.

“Are you kidding, carjacking? Do you see that I am eight months pregnant?” she asked them, the lawsuits says. Still, she was handcuffed, taken to jail and booked, it states.

Woodruff later learned she was implicated in the alleged incident after the facial recognition software hit as well as the carjacking victim allegedly identified her in a lineup of six photos that included her mugshot from a 2015 arrest, the complaint states. Police had access to her current driver’s license photo issued in 2021, but used the older photo, according to the complaint.

While the criminal charges against Woodruff were dismissed less than a month later for insufficient evidence, she is seeking a jury trial to recover punitive and other damages, states the suit, which specifically notes “the troubling implications of facial recognition technology in this case.”

“Facial recognition alone cannot serve as probable cause for arrests, as a computer’s identification is prone to errors that humans might also make,” the complaint claims. “Despite its potential, law enforcement’s reliance on facial recognition has led to wrongful arrests, causing humiliation, embarrassment, and physical injury, as evident in this particular incident.”

The lawsuit is the latest to zero in on facial recognition technology and its potential risks following warnings by experts about AI’s tendency toward errors and bias, along with the dangers of inaccurate facial recognition usage.

The suit further alleges Detroit police engaged “in a pattern of racial discrimination of (Woodruff) and other Black citizens by using facial recognition technology practices proven to misidentify Black citizens at a higher rate than others in violation of the equal protection guaranteed by” Michigan’s 1976 civil rights act.

In recent years, researchers have cautioned against the widespread use of technologies like facial recognition that may lead to race or gender discrimination.

A 2019 US government study found many facial recognition algorithms were far more likely to misidentify racial minorities than White people. Native American, Black and Asian people were all disproportionately more likely to be affected, according to the study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Testing found that some algorithms were up to 100 times more likely to confuse two different non-White people, the agency said at the time. In the face of those concerns, several cities nationwide have banned the use of facial recognition by city officials including San Francisco and Somerville, Massachusetts.

Woodruff’s suit also alleges malicious prosecution by the detective who submitted the warrant that led to her arrest, claiming the detective’s “actions appeared to be driven by malice,” it states.

Detroit’s police chief called the allegations “very concerning.”

“We are taking this matter very seriously, but we cannot comment further at this time due to the need for additional investigation,” Chief James White told CNN in a statement. “We will provide further information once additional facts are obtained and we have a better understanding of the circumstances.”

CNN has reached to the Detroit Fraternal Order of Police, the Michigan Fraternal Order of Police and the National Fraternal Order of Police for comment but has not heard back.

Det. LaShauntia Oliver, who is named in the suit, was assigned to the carjacking case and submitted the facial recognition request, according to the complaint. CNN reached Oliver via phone but was not able to get a comment before Oliver disconnected the call.

This is not the only time the Detroit police department has been involved in the alleged misuse of facial recognition technology: In 2020, the American Civil Liberties Union filed an administrative complaint with the department in what the nonprofit said was the first known case of wrongful arrest involving facial recognition.

At the time, the department had provided video surveillance footage of a suspect to state police, who ran the footage through a facial-recognition system. The system suggested a photo of a man named Robert Williams as a potential match. But after Williams was arrested and held in a detention center, officers realized he was not the suspect they sought.

CNN has requested comment from the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office, Woodruff and her attorney, Ivan Land.

‘Baffled and assuming it was a joke’​

The carjacking and robbery victim contacted Detroit Police on January 29 to report the incident, the complaint shows. Oliver days later learned a woman returned the victim’s cell phone to a BP gas station, so she went to there to review the video footage.

The video was submitted for a facial recognition request on the woman who returned the phone, and it identified Woodruff, the suit states.

Oliver went back to the gas station to see more video footage and “stated in detail in her report what she observed in the video footage, and there was no mention of the female suspect being pregnant,” the complaint states.

The victim was later shown a “six-pack lineup” including the eight-year-old booking photo of Woodruff and “allegedly identified” Woodruff as being present during the carjacking, the suit states.

When first confronted with the arrest warrant, Woodruff was “baffled and assuming it was a joke, given her visibly pregnant state,” the suit says. She and her fiancé “urged the officers to check the warrant to confirm the female who committed the robbery and carjacking was pregnant, but the officers refused to do so,” the complaint says.

“The officers made it clear they were serious and proceeded to arrest her,” it states.

Woodruff was held for approximately 11 hours. Her fiancé later took her to the hospital after she suffered from “stomach tightness and pain, whole body pains, headaches, and body weakness,” the complaint states.

She was diagnosed with low heart rate due to dehydration and was told she was having stress-induced contractions, the document says.

 

Detroit Woman Sues City Police After Being Wrongfully Arrested Due To AI Facial Recognition


TOPLINE

A Detroit woman sued the city Thursday after being wrongfully arrested when she was mistakenly identified using AI facial recognition, a technology that has prompted debate about the inaccuracy and racism of the algorithm.

KEY FACTS​

Porsha Woodruff, 32, filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for Eastern Michigan, naming Detective LaShauntia Oliver as the official responsible for negligence in running the AI facial recognition.

Oliver used an eight-year-old photo of Woodruff that matched the face on the robbery videotape, despite having a more recent ID photo from her, according to the lawsuit—Oliver then showed that same picture in a lineup for the victim, who also mistakenly identified her as the perpetrator.

The incident, which happened in February, while she was heavily pregnant, became public on Thursday following Woodruff’s filing.

The Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office dropped the original robbery case on March 6 for “insufficient evidence,” according to the lawsuit.
The arrest of Woodruff, who is Black, highlights arguments about biased AI algorithms that are fueling discrimination in policing.

CRUCIAL QUOTE​

Detroit Police Chief James E. White said the allegations in the lawsuit were “very concerning.” “We are taking this matter very seriously, but we cannot comment further at this time due to the need for additional investigation,” he said in a statement to NBC.

KEY BACKGROUND​

Woodruff was getting her two daughters ready for school when six police officers showed up at her door in her Detroit home last February. “I thought it was a joke, honestly,” she told the New York Times. “I thought it was a prank.” When she realized she was being detained, she told her children, ages 6 and 12, to get back into the house and tell her fiancé: “Mommy’s going to jail,” she said. She later learned that a police officer had used a 2015 picture of her, taken when she was stopped for driving without a license. As a result of that, police officers actually had a more recent photo of her current driving license that they didn’t use to contrast the result of AI facial recognition. After spending the day at the Detroit Detention Center, Woodruff went to a medical center, where she was diagnosed with a low heart rate due to dehydration, and she experienced early contractions from the stress of the incident.

CONTRA​

U.S. lawmakers introduced the Facial Recognition Act of 2022 in September as a first attempt to regulate the transparency of the algorithm. This is not the first case of a flaw in AI facial recognition in policing. The Detroit Police Department in particular wrongfully arrested three Black men in 2019 and 2020, putting one of them in jail by mistake.

 

Black mom sues city of Detroit claiming she was falsely arrested while 8 months pregnant by officers using facial

230807154058-porcha-woodruff.jpg

Porcha Woodruff's lawsuit is the latest to zero in on facial recognition technology and its potential risks.

Police Department detective after she was falsely arrested while eight months pregnant by officers using “an unreliable facial recognition match,” a federal lawsuit filed Thursday says.

Porcha Woodruff, 32, was home around 8 a.m. on February 16, helping her 6- and 12-year-olds get ready for school when six Detroit police officers arrived at her door with an arrest warrant for carjacking and robbery, the complaint states.

“Are you kidding, carjacking? Do you see that I am eight months pregnant?” she asked them, the lawsuits says. Still, she was handcuffed, taken to jail and booked, it states.

Woodruff later learned she was implicated in the alleged incident after the facial recognition software hit as well as the carjacking victim allegedly identified her in a lineup of six photos that included her mugshot from a 2015 arrest, the complaint states. Police had access to her current driver’s license photo issued in 2021, but used the older photo, according to the complaint.

While the criminal charges against Woodruff were dismissed less than a month later for insufficient evidence, she is seeking a jury trial to recover punitive and other damages, states the suit, which specifically notes “the troubling implications of facial recognition technology in this case.”

“Facial recognition alone cannot serve as probable cause for arrests, as a computer’s identification is prone to errors that humans might also make,” the complaint claims. “Despite its potential, law enforcement’s reliance on facial recognition has led to wrongful arrests, causing humiliation, embarrassment, and physical injury, as evident in this particular incident.”

The lawsuit is the latest to zero in on facial recognition technology and its potential risks following warnings by experts about AI’s tendency toward errors and bias, along with the dangers of inaccurate facial recognition usage.

The suit further alleges Detroit police engaged “in a pattern of racial discrimination of (Woodruff) and other Black citizens by using facial recognition technology practices proven to misidentify Black citizens at a higher rate than others in violation of the equal protection guaranteed by” Michigan’s 1976 civil rights act.

In recent years, researchers have cautioned against the widespread use of technologies like facial recognition that may lead to race or gender discrimination.

A 2019 US government study found many facial recognition algorithms were far more likely to misidentify racial minorities than White people. Native American, Black and Asian people were all disproportionately more likely to be affected, according to the study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Testing found that some algorithms were up to 100 times more likely to confuse two different non-White people, the agency said at the time. In the face of those concerns, several cities nationwide have banned the use of facial recognition by city officials including San Francisco and Somerville, Massachusetts.

Woodruff’s suit also alleges malicious prosecution by the detective who submitted the warrant that led to her arrest, claiming the detective’s “actions appeared to be driven by malice,” it states.

Detroit’s police chief called the allegations “very concerning.”

“We are taking this matter very seriously, but we cannot comment further at this time due to the need for additional investigation,” Chief James White told CNN in a statement. “We will provide further information once additional facts are obtained and we have a better understanding of the circumstances.”

CNN has reached to the Detroit Fraternal Order of Police, the Michigan Fraternal Order of Police and the National Fraternal Order of Police for comment but has not heard back.

Det. LaShauntia Oliver, who is named in the suit, was assigned to the carjacking case and submitted the facial recognition request, according to the complaint. CNN reached Oliver via phone but was not able to get a comment before Oliver disconnected the call.

This is not the only time the Detroit police department has been involved in the alleged misuse of facial recognition technology: In 2020, the American Civil Liberties Union filed an administrative complaint with the department in what the nonprofit said was the first known case of wrongful arrest involving facial recognition.

At the time, the department had provided video surveillance footage of a suspect to state police, who ran the footage through a facial-recognition system. The system suggested a photo of a man named Robert Williams as a potential match. But after Williams was arrested and held in a detention center, officers realized he was not the suspect they sought.

CNN has requested comment from the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office, Woodruff and her attorney, Ivan Land.

‘Baffled and assuming it was a joke’​

The carjacking and robbery victim contacted Detroit Police on January 29 to report the incident, the complaint shows. Oliver days later learned a woman returned the victim’s cell phone to a BP gas station, so she went to there to review the video footage.

The video was submitted for a facial recognition request on the woman who returned the phone, and it identified Woodruff, the suit states.

Oliver went back to the gas station to see more video footage and “stated in detail in her report what she observed in the video footage, and there was no mention of the female suspect being pregnant,” the complaint states.

The victim was later shown a “six-pack lineup” including the eight-year-old booking photo of Woodruff and “allegedly identified” Woodruff as being present during the carjacking, the suit states.

When first confronted with the arrest warrant, Woodruff was “baffled and assuming it was a joke, given her visibly pregnant state,” the suit says. She and her fiancé “urged the officers to check the warrant to confirm the female who committed the robbery and carjacking was pregnant, but the officers refused to do so,” the complaint says.

“The officers made it clear they were serious and proceeded to arrest her,” it states.

Woodruff was held for approximately 11 hours. Her fiancé later took her to the hospital after she suffered from “stomach tightness and pain, whole body pains, headaches, and body weakness,” the complaint states.

She was diagnosed with low heart rate due to dehydration and was told she was having stress-induced contractions, the document says.



When they pulled that family over coming from a basket ball event and put the son in cuffs I remember thinking…..

Not one officer there thought, with all of their reliance on instinct, that hmmmmm this just doesn’t seem right lets back up a little.

Cops don’t think twice about putting us in handcuffs and figuring it out after the fact.

It’s a shame that this will be a hit to the taxpayers and no one will be fired.

Free to do this again.

Carry on…..
 
Back
Top