Exxon Wins Freeze on $12 Billion of Venezuelan Assets

GreedySmurf

Star
Registered
Big Oil is starting to get a little aggressive in its business dealings now. I guess $41 billion in profit just isn't quite enough for them... :hmm:

Exxon Wins Freeze on $12 Billion of Venezuelan Assets

By Michael Erman
Reuters

Friday 08 February 2008

New York - Exxon Mobil Corp has won court orders freezing up to $12 billion in Venezuelan assets around the world as it fights for compensation for operations lost to President Hugo Chavez's nationalization drive.

The largest U.S. company sought the asset freeze to guarantee repayment should it win arbitration over the Cerro Negro heavy oil project.

The move is the boldest challenge yet by an international oil major against any of the governments around the world that have moved to increase their holds on natural resources as energy and commodity prices have soared.

"To me it sounds like a very aggressive tactic," said Stephen Zamora, professor of international law at the University of Houston Law Center.

"I can't really say that I'm aware this has been used in other investment disputes. They may be trying to get the government to settle."

Exxon - which last week posted the largest ever year's profit by a U.S. company - said on Thursday it has received court orders in Britain, the Netherlands and the Netherlands Antilles each freezing up to $12 billion in assets of Venezuela state oil firm PDVSA. An Exxon spokeswoman said the total that could be frozen worldwide was $12 billion.

Exxon also won a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in December freezing more than $300 million belonging to PDVSA, seeking to guarantee repayment should it win the arbitration.

PDVSA, one of the largest suppliers of crude oil to the United States, was not immediately available for comment. The White House and the U.S. State Department also declined to comment.

Venezuela's sovereign bonds sold off after the court orders surfaced.

Left-winger Chavez, who regularly clashes with the Bush administration, took over Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips stakes in multibillion-dollar heavy oil projects in Venezuela's oil region last June.

The move was part of the left-wing leader's drive to nationalize key industries including utilities and telecommunications companies owned by private companies.

Challenge to Chavez

The news comes as a tough blow to Chavez, who suffered a stinging defeat in a December referendum that would have let him run indefinitely for reelection and enshrine socialism as the OPEC nation's economic system.

PDVSA is already facing growing debt and increasing operational problems that analysts attribute to underinvestment caused by the company's massive contributions to Chavez's social programs.

But the near-term effect of the Exxon legal maneuver on PDVSA's day-to-day operations was not immediately clear.

The South American nation has an extensive overseas refining network, including the Citgo refining and marketing branch in the United States.

Exxon said in court filings that recent estimates have placed PDVSA's global asset value - including its operations in Venezuela - at over $62 billion

PDVSA's European refining assets, principally a 50 percent share in the German refining joint venture Ruhr Oel, were held through a Netherlands Company PDV Europa BV, according to filings PDVSA made with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2006.

Exxon filed for arbitration in September with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.

Exxon has not specified how much it wants for the 41.7 percent stake in the Cerro Negro project, but it has said its remaining book investment in the project was about $750 million at the time the assets were expropriated.

The move underscores Exxon's reputation for toughness in dealing with foes as varied as governments and fishermen, as it has been willing to wage prolonged legal battles to defend its interests around the world.

Amy Meyers Jaffe, energy policy researcher at Rice's Baker Institute, said the case could have far-reaching implications.

"These are precedents that are going to be important for what people can and cannot do in the oil industry," she said.

ConocoPhillips spokesman William Tanner said his company "continues to discuss an amicable resolution regarding the assets that were expropriated in Venezuela."

Conoco filed for arbitration over the dispute in November.

Venezuela's benchmark global bond due 2027 lost 2.375 points in price to be bid 98.938, while total returns offered by the country's debt slipped 1.52 percent according to the JP Morgan EMBI+ index.
 
I'm about sick about this bullshit and I don't yet understand why Chavez got this beef with the US. I mean never mind Bush, he's gone in a few months but his beef with oil affects how shit will flow in my gas tank.

I don't know what the bullshit is all about. I don't know if chavez wants to dominate all oil and play king maker or just trying to show who got range in the pissing contest.

Whatever the fuck it is if chavez adversely affects me, I got a problem with him.

Anyone who is not delusional about the world care to take a crack at explaining because I don't understand.

-VG
 
I'm about sick about this bullshit and I don't yet understand why Chavez got this beef with the US. I mean never mind Bush, he's gone in a few months but his beef with oil affects how shit will flow in my gas tank.

I don't know what the bullshit is all about. I don't know if chavez wants to dominate all oil and play king maker or just trying to show who got range in the pissing contest.

Whatever the fuck it is if chavez adversely affects me, I got a problem with him.

Anyone who is not delusional about the world care to take a crack at explaining because I don't understand.

-VG
People need to recognize that what the US is doing is modern-day economic colonialism. Iraq, Iran (again) and Venezuela are in the cross hairs for their resources - period.

In 1953 the US sponsored a coup in Iran because their leader at the time wanted to nationalize oil. The British were furious and asked the US to intervene. We did and installed the Shah (of Iran). The US and Britain (BP) divided up the oil profits for themselves.:hmm:

Venezuela has large oil reserves. Chavez is on the same track. That is why he is our "enemy".:puke: He is lending money to Latin American neighbors to payoff their debts to the International Monetary Fund and F-N up how Europe and America planned to keep these countries indentured.

If you are mad at anyone look at our government. :hmm: Why are nations that have large oil deposits our enemy? Because we can't control them. Therefore we undermine their governments and attack them in the press (Iran) or on the ground (Iraq).:smh:


Look at at least the first 3 at least (of 10) IF you want to open your eyes.
I welcome your feedback AFTER you look at these before you write Chavez off (like they want you to). If you don't you will continue to be in the dark about REAL U.S. foreign policy in South America....


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/to6uNUTf8g4&rel=1[/FLASH]

[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/LMvY3yZfmqI&rel=1[/FLASH]

[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/7EtHTGuFTNY&rel=1[/FLASH]
 
Thank you for the videos but I am a reader. I prefer to read accounts from responsible people on the subject matter. Also, they can't be loons either. Videos oftentimes are off balance.

-VG
 
Thank you for the videos but I am a reader. I prefer to read accounts from responsible people on the subject matter. Also, they can't be loons either. Videos oftentimes are off balance.

-VG
Heres the deal. If you are on the pursuit of the TRUTH and knowledge you will get it where you can. :yes: You obviously have a strong opinion about the matter that is line with what you have already "read" or were told. :hmm: If you want to "read" go get The War on Democracy by James Pilger. He IS a credible authority. He works in London and does reports that expose the F-N truth. :yes: Again, if you look at the first three videos you will get the truth. I can lead you but I can't make you drink. I've done my part.

Peace.
 
Heres the deal. If you are on the pursuit of the TRUTH and knowledge you will get it where you can. :yes: You obviously have a strong opinion about the matter that is line with what you have already "read" or were told. :hmm: If you want to "read" go get The War on Democracy by James Pilger. He IS a credible authority. He works in London and does reports that expose the F-N truth. :yes: Again, if you look at the first three videos you will get the truth. I can lead you but I can't make you drink. I've done my part.

Peace.

You did and I appreciate the posts. I just can't have a youtube video make up my mind for me on something this important.

I'll do some reading on it.

-VG
 
...Humor me. The youtube video is a documentary on the Book by Pilger.;) You are going to get the real deal form this video fam 4 real.:yes:



'THE WAR ON DEMOCRACY' TO BE RELEASED ON DVD IN BRITAIN, US & AUSTRALIA

Following ITV's showing of 'The War on Democracy' last August, more than 10,000 viewers contacted this website to ask about DVD distribution of the film. 'The War on Democracy' is to be released on DVD in Britain, the US and Australia in January and February. Distribution throughout the US has been agreed with Bullfrog Films, which has carried many of Pilger's collected films. Lionsgate and Hopscotch will market the DVD following their successful cinema distribution of the film.

For more information, contact video@bullfrog.com (United States); info@lionsgatefilms.co.uk (United Kingdom); and info@hopscotch.com (Australia).

WATCH THE TRAILER

Read Pilger's Guardian article about 'The War on Democracy'.

'The War on Democracy' is John Pilger's first major film for the cinema - in a career that has produced more than 55 television documentaries. Set in Latin America and the US, it explores the historic and current relationship of Washington with countries such as Venezuela, Bolivia and Chile.

"The film tells a universal story," says Pilger, "analysing and revealing, through vivid testimony, the story of great power behind its venerable myths. It allows us to understand the true nature of the so-called war on terror". View all Pilger DVDs
'INSIDE BURMA' RELEASED ON DVD IN AUSTRALIA


A new John Pilger DVD, 'Inside Burma: Land of Fear', is to be released in Australia in February 2008. The film, first shown in 1996 and updated in 1998, exposes the history and brutality of one of the world's most repressive regimes. The film includes an interview with Aung San Suu Kyi.

Read John Pilger's latest article on Burma, published in the New Statesman in October 2007. In the same month, Pilger also paid tribute to Aung San Suu Kyi at a London meeting organised by PEN and the Writers' Network of Burma.

All Burma articles by John Pilger.
A CHANGE IS GONNA COME
Sam Cooke
'The War on Democracy' features the music of the great Chilean balladeer Victor Jara and the legendary American soul singer Sam Cooke (pictured right).

John Pilger describes Cooke's 'A Change Is Gonna Come' as "one of the finest, most lyrical pieces of black music ever written and performed. I was in the southern United States when it was released. It was the time of the civil-rights movement, and Cooke's song spoke to and for all people struggling to be free. The same is true of the ballads of the Jara, whose songs celebrated the popular democracy of Salvador Allende before Pinochet and the CIA extinguished it." www.samcooke.com
THE RISING OF LATIN AMERICA - THE GENESIS OF 'THE WAR ON DEMOCRACY'
"Modern fictional cinema rarely seems to break political silences. The very fine Motorcycle Diaries was a generation too late. In this country, where Hollywood sets the liberal boundaries, the work of Ken Loach and a few others is an honourable exception. However, the cinema is changing as if by default. The documentary has returned to the big screen and is being embraced by the public." John Pilger writes in the Guardian as his acclaimed film 'The War On Democracy' hits UK cinemas.
THE INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT - PILGER AT THE SOCIALISM 2007 CONFERENCE IN CHICAGO
John Pilger addressed the Socialism 2007 conference in Chicago on 16 June. He spoke about what Edward Bernays called the "invisible government which is the true ruling power" - the media - and how propaganda so often disguises itself as journalism.

Read transcript | Watch video
NEW COLLECTION OF PILGER FILMS OUT ON DVD
Documentaries That Changed The World cover

John Pilger DVDs are now available to buy in the UK.

Released on DVD for the first time and personally chosen by John Pilger, the Documentaries That Changed The World & In The Name Of Justice box sets bring together 24 of Pilger's most hard-hitting and inspirational films.

You can also buy John's Australian and American DVDs.

http://www.johnpilger.com/
 
How do you think we should handle the situation ?

What do you mean "we"? I don't have any beef with Chavez. What he is doing is trying to protect the resources of his nation from greedy American corporations.


Dude pretty much beat me to the punch.
People need to recognize that what the US is doing is modern-day economic colonialism. Iraq, Iran (again) and Venezuela are in the cross hairs for their resources - period.

In 1953 the US sponsored a coup in Iran because their leader at the time wanted to nationalize oil. The British were furious and asked the US to intervene. We did and installed the Shah (of Iran). The US and Britain (BP) divided up the oil profits for themselves.:hmm:

Venezuela has large oil reserves. Chavez is on the same track. That is why he is our "enemy".:puke: He is lending money to Latin American neighbors to payoff their debts to the International Monetary Fund and F-N up how Europe and America planned to keep these countries indentured.

If you are mad at anyone look at our government. :hmm: Why are nations that have large oil deposits our enemy? Because we can't control them. Therefore we undermine their governments and attack them in the press (Iran) or on the ground (Iraq).:smh:


Look at at least the first 3 at least (of 10) IF you want to open your eyes.
I welcome your feedback AFTER you look at these before you write Chavez off (like they want you to). If you don't you will continue to be in the dark about REAL U.S. foreign policy in South America....


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/to6uNUTf8g4&rel=1[/FLASH]

[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/LMvY3yZfmqI&rel=1[/FLASH]

[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/7EtHTGuFTNY&rel=1[/FLASH]
 
BBC NEWS
Venezuela threatens to cut US oil

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has threatened to cut off oil supplies to the US unless it halts what he calls its "economic war" against his country.

His warning came days after US oil giant Exxon Mobil won orders in US, UK and Dutch courts to freeze billions of dollars of Venezuelan oil assets.

Exxon wants more compensation from the Chavez government after it took control of Exxon oil projects last year.

The US is the biggest market for Venezuela's heavy crude oil exports.

President Chavez has threatened several times before to stop sending Venezuelan oil to the US but so far not done so.

Nevertheless, his comments during his weekly televised address, took sharp aim at Exxon Mobil and, by extension, the Bush administration.

He described Exxon's management as imperialist bandits who form part of a US government-backed campaign to destabilise Venezuela.

"If you end up freezing [Venezuelan] assets and it harms us, we're going to harm you," Mr Chavez said.

"Do you know how? We aren't going to send oil to the US. Take note, Mr Bush, Mr Danger."

Long dispute

At the heart of the dispute is last year's decision to take over oil projects in the Orinoco Belt, a move Mr Chavez has argued will bring billions of dollars back to the Venezuelan people.

Exxon Mobil refused to sell a majority stake to the Venezuelan government.

It has taken its case for compensation to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, a process that could take years.

It has not indicated how much compensation it wants for the 41.7% stake in the Orinoco Belt oil field - worth an estimated $750m (£370m).

Last week, the company won temporary court orders in the UK, the Netherlands and the Caribbean freezing Venezuelan assets worth up to $12bn (£6bn).

Another order in a New York court froze up to $315m of funds of the state-run Venezuelan oil company, PDVSA.

Further hearings are scheduled later this month in New York and London.

It will be a tough fight, says the BBC's James Ingham in Caracas.

Mr Chavez is a strong leader who rails against what he calls the evils of capitalism while Exxon is renowned as a tough corporate player.

Cutting off oil deliveries to the US would be damaging to Caracas as well as Washington.

The US is not only Venezuela's biggest market but is also home to refineries that specialise in the heavy sour crude oil Venezuela exports.

The threat, then, may be too risky for Mr Chavez to carry out, our correspondent says.

What is your reaction to President Chavez's threat? Are you worried about being affected? Send us your comments using the form below.

Name
Your E-mail address
Town & Country
Phone number (optional):
Comments
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/7238214.stm

Published: 2008/02/11 11:50:30 GMT

© BBC MMVIII
 
What do you mean "we"? I don't have any beef with Chavez. What he is doing is trying to protect the resources of his nation from greedy American corporations.


Dude pretty much beat me to the punch.

Thanks. However, do you know that it was the same "greedy american corporations" that developed the ability to refine the type of crude that he has ? And America is the single largest exporter and refiner of that oil. Is what he doing any different that if an American government agent comes into your home and says "get out, we are nationalizing the home you built, without compensation" ?
 
Thanks. However, do you know that it was the same "greedy american corporations" that developed the ability to refine the type of crude that he has ? And America is the single largest exporter and refiner of that oil. Is what he doing any different that if an American government agent comes into your home and says "get out, we are nationalizing the home you built, without compensation" ?

So what does that really mean?!?? WE profit from that technological exchange. It's capitalism no more no less. Its not that we were being noble or nothing. :smh: We also sold Saddam the chemicals to gas the Kurds!?!?!?:hmm: We kept him in power to our benefit until he wanted to trade in Euro's. We use and exploit those we can. Its about greed and monopolization of wealth for everyone but you and me. Trust me.
 
So what does that really mean?!?? WE profit from that technological exchange. It's capitalism no more no less. Its not that we were being noble or nothing. :smh: We also sold Saddam the chemicals to gas the Kurds!?!?!?:hmm: We kept him in power to our benefit until he wanted to trade in Euro's. We use and exploit those we can. Its about greed and monopolization of wealth for everyone but you and me. Trust me.

Dude, are your crazy ? It means that they have a vaild, vested interest in what they developed, and had a valid contract to.
You can't go around dishonoring contracts just because you feel like it. At that point, you are being nothing but an elitist yourself.
 
Thanks. However, do you know that it was the same "greedy american corporations" that developed the ability to refine the type of crude that he has ? And America is the single largest exporter and refiner of that oil. Is what he doing any different that if an American government agent comes into your home and says "get out, we are nationalizing the home you built, without compensation" ?

Dude, are your crazy ? It means that they have a vaild, vested interest in what they developed, and had a valid contract to.
You can't go around dishonoring contracts just because you feel like it. At that point, you are being nothing but an elitist yourself.

You have valid points if they only were actually true. The bottom line is the corporations are still getting all of the profits while the citizens aren't seeing hardly a dime. Oh despite the contracts its still their land. So they have the right to back out if they feel they are being fucked over.:hmm:
 
What do you mean "we"? I don't have any beef with Chavez. What he is doing is trying to protect the resources of his nation from greedy American corporations.


Dude pretty much beat me to the punch.

Thanks. However, do you know that it was the same "greedy american corporations" that developed the ability to refine the type of crude that he has ? And America is the single largest exporter and refiner of that oil. Is what he doing any different that if an American government agent comes into your home and says "get out, we are nationalizing the home you built, without compensation" ?

Chavez didn't try and do anything without compensation:
Exxon Mobil refused to sell a majority stake to the Venezuelan government.
:yes:
 
Dude, are your crazy ? It means that they have a vaild, vested interest in what they developed, and had a valid contract to.
You can't go around dishonoring contracts just because you feel like it. At that point, you are being nothing but an elitist yourself.

Have you read "Confessions of an Economic Hitman?" If not do so or look it up on youtube. If a country is "coerced" into deals. If you make contracts with country leaders that are puppets YOU insert into the highest post in the government (Iran - Shah). IF you give no-bid contracts to companies for infrastructure development (Halliburton-Iraq) there is no F-N way you can consider it FAIR or an equal exchange of investment/return for the pimped country:hmm::smh: We don't do anything for free or to help anyone but us. Fact.
 
ostrich.jpg

Like I said before, this is VegasGuy’s view of the world. He is a republican, some people are so incapable of understanding only the master’s problems. He wouldn’t believe you it you laid out how the CIA backed the coup d'état of Salvador Allende, if you showed him how the US propped up Mohammad Reza Pahlavi or how the CIA mined Nicaragua’s harbors. The world is changing before their eyes and some people won’t acknowledge it.
 
Last edited:
It only makes sense that the people who exploited Venezuela's resources to begin with would develop ways to utilize those resources. Using that infrastructure to justify any claim they have is meaningless.

Contracts are voided all the time. Ownership changes for various things all the time.
Claiming that stolen property you possess should not be returned to the rightful owner is the argument of thieves.
 
Thanks. However, do you know that it was the same "greedy american corporations" that developed the ability to refine the type of crude that he has ? And America is the single largest exporter and refiner of that oil. Is what he doing any different that if an American government agent comes into your home and says "get out, we are nationalizing the home you built, without compensation" ?

Poor multinational oil conglomerate, I think Exxon/Mobil has gotten way more out of Venezuela than they have invested in it, especially with a failed attempted coup.
 
ostrich.jpg

Like I said before, this is VegasGuy’s view of the world. He is a republican, some people are so incapable of understanding only the master’s problems. He wouldn’t believe you it you laid out how the CIA backed the coup d'état of Salvador Allende, if you showed him how the US propped up Mohammad Reza Pahlavi or how the CIA mined Nicaragua’s harbors. The world is changing before their eyes and some people won’t acknowledge it.

Ohhhhh. If this is true then it would explain some things (neither negative or positive VG). :hmm:
 
Ohhhhh. If this is true then it would explain some things (neither negative or positive VG). :hmm:

You haven’t followed his post? He supposedly has me on ignore, because he can’t handle the truth. That demonstrates intellectual weakness, a typical right wing trait. When you argue with him on an issue and he is hemmed up, he will respond with a typical conservative talk show quip or say your source is wacko. Who is more wacko than the current crop of Bush/Chaney administration lemmings?
 
You haven’t followed his post? He supposedly has me on ignore, because he can’t handle the truth. That demonstrates intellectual weakness, a typical right wing trait. When you argue with him on an issue and he is hemmed up, he will respond with a typical conservative talk show quip or say your source is wacko. Who is more wacko than the current crop of Bush/Chaney administration lemmings?

A few times that we were in the same post we were almost in tune. That is why I eagerly sent him the Pilger youtube clips because they would surly answer any questions he has. Was sort of shocked by him not looking at what I sent and responding: "I just can't have a youtube video make up my mind for me on something this important.":confused:

If the info is true, to me, I don't care how I got to me I'd just want it - especially since I asked for it. But that is just me. No worries though. Thanks.
 
A few times that we were in the same post we were almost in tune. That is why I eagerly sent him the Pilger youtube clips because they would surly answer any questions he has. Was sort of shocked by him not looking at what I sent and responding: "I just can't have a youtube video make up my mind for me on something this important.":confused:

If the info is true, to me, I don't care how I got to me I'd just want it - especially since I asked for it. But that is just me. No worries though. Thanks.

Denial!
 

Have you read "Confessions of an Economic Hitman?" If not do so or look it up on youtube. If a country is "coerced" into deals. If you make contracts with country leaders that are puppets YOU insert into the highest post in the government (Iran - Shah). IF you give no-bid contracts to companies for infrastructure development (Halliburton-Iraq) there is no F-N way you can consider it FAIR or an equal exchange of investment/return for the pimped country:hmm::smh: We don't do anything for free or to help anyone but us. Fact.

I will do so.
 
the root of the "controversy"

Chavez dumps Exxon Mobil, stokes confrontation with U.S.
G2Americas | Intelligence Brief

07/02/06 – No. 02/06 – Venezuela’s national petrochemicals company Pequiven has dumped Exxon Mobil Corporation from a proposed $3 billion olefins plant which both companies had been developing for over a year. Pequiven gave Exxon Mobil the boot after both companies reportedly had started an international road show to raise $1.8 billion in project financing. This is the third business venture Exxon Mobil has lost in Venezuela since President Hugo Chavez took power seven years ago. It won’t be the last.

Pequiven officials said the joint venture negotiations with Exxon Mobil were terminated because the company was not complying with its obligations under the project development agreement (PDA) signed with Pequiven. In fact, Exxon Mobil was tossed out of the olefins project for political reasons, and to send other oil companies the message that anyone who refuses to comply with the Chavez government’s terms isn’t welcome in Venezuela.

Exxon Mobil issued a statement this week expressing regret for Pequiven’s decision, and stating that the company was still interested in other oil, gas and petrochemical business opportunities that may develop in the future. However, we believe that Exxon Mobil has no future in Venezuela while Chavez remains in power. Many senior officials in the Chavez government view Exxon Mobil privately as a dangerous threat that must be neutralized.

The U.S. oil company’s attorneys are challenging the Chavez government’s decision more than a year ago to hike the royalty rate on four strategic associations in the Orinoco Heavy Oil Belt. Exxon Mobil owns 41.67 percent of the $3 billion Cerro Negro strategic association, with PDVSA also holding 41.67 percent. The rest of Cerro Negro is owned by a Canadian subsidiary of Germany’s Veba Oel. Exxon Mobil maintains that the government broke its contractual obligations when it hiked the royalty rate at the end of 2004.

Last December, Exxon Mobil also refused to accept the forced conversion of its oilfield operating service contract in the Quaimare-La Ceiba oilfield into a joint venture with PDVSA, and withdrew from that business instead. Out of 22 foreign oil companies affected by the government’s decision to suspend the oilfield service contracts, Exxon Mobil was the only company that rejected the government’s pressures.

Exxon Mobil also was excluded a couple of years ago from the Cristóbal Colón liquefied natural gas (LNG) project, which is now called the Mariscal Sucre project (but still hasn’t started construction), because it disagreed with the government’s plans for developing the natural gas sector.

In coming months, the Chavez government likely will seize majority ownership (over 50 percent) of the four strategic associations in the Orinoco Heavy Oil Belt, including Cerro Negro. PDVSA currently isn’t the majority owner of any of these associations, which were created before the enactment of Venezuela’s 1999 Constitution and the 2001 Hydrocarbons Law, both of which mandate that PDVSA must be the majority owner of all joint ventures with foreign oil companies in Venezuela.

It wasn’t a coincidence that Pequiven’s Jan. 20 decision to dump Exxon Mobil from the $3 billion olefins project was leaked by Venezuela’s government immediately after the 14th anniversary of Chavez’s failed Feb. 4, 1992 coup attempt against former President Carlos Andres Perez.:smh:

Chavez continues to escalate his political confrontation with the Bush administration. Dumping Houston-based Exxon Mobil publicly from the olefins project is part of his strategy of provoking the Bush administration.:hmm: Permanent confrontation with the U.S. government is a cornerstone of President Chavez’s foreign policy, which is shaped and refined in frequent personal communications between Chavez and Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

This confrontation, which has been driven from the start by Chavez, pays handsome financial and political dividends for Venezuela’s president. It contributes to driving oil prices higher. For every dollar per barrel increase in oil’s price, Venezuela earns another $1 billion a year. It also strengthens Chavez’s popularity with his followers in Venezuela and regionally. With presidential elections scheduled in 11 months, Chavez plans to spend $65 billion on social and infrastructure programs this year to boost his chances of being re-elected president for another six years. This means he will seek to drive oil prices significantly higher in 2006. We believe that Chavez wants to push oil prices over $75 a barrel, and elevating his political confrontation with the U.S. is a means for achieving that price level.

It has long been assumed, though, that Chavez would not push the confrontation to the point of suspending oil shipments to the U.S. That course of action, critics argue, would be suicidal for Chavez because he would be unable to find other buyers for the heavy and sulfurous crude oil not sent to the U.S. However, we disagree. Since Chavez first announced slightly over one year ago that Venezuela would break its oil supply dependency on the U.S., Venezuela’s oil exports to the U.S. have dropped from an average 1.5 million b/d in 2004 to about 1.2 million b/d in 2005. Oil and products exports to other countries grew about 300,000 b/d in the same period. This trend will be more pronounced in 2006.

It’s unlikely that Chavez would unilaterally curtail or suspend Venezuela’s oil exports to the U.S. without first having a motive he can use to excuse his aggression as the legitimate response of someone who is being victimized. Chavez loves portraying himself as the aggrieved victim in confrontations that he is the first to trigger. By driving tensions with the U.S. ever-higher, he is seeking to reach a point where the U.S. moves against him first in ways that would justify a decision in Caracas to expel or detain U.S. government personnel in Venezuela, nationalize U.S. oil and non-oil assets in Venezuela, or curtail some oil shipments to the U.S.

Meanwhile, Chavez will use the growing stream of oil export revenues flooding into Venezuela during 2006 to create the illusion of prosperity by hiking public spending to the highest levels in the country’s history to achieve growth via increased consumption. He will also buy more weapons, including hundreds of thousands of assault rifles to arm his national military reserve, which now totals over one million volunteers (about half are women). Chavez will seek to buy military transport aircraft and fighters from Russia and China. Chavez also said on Feb. 4 that he will seek to buy several SAM systems.

Send comments and questions to analyst@g2americas.com


http://www.vcrisis.com/index.php?content=pr/200602090716
 
Thank you for the videos but I am a reader. I prefer to read accounts from responsible people on the subject matter. Also, they can't be loons either. Videos oftentimes are off balance.

-VG

Dude, Pilger took this joint to the Cannes Film Festival. This IS NOT a hack piece done by a nut job or "loon" as you put it. :smh: You may want to reconsider your current stance on processing information if you want to really understand this topic.:yes:

(note: This is a shameless rip from another post. All credit goes to muckraker10021 for this piece).:D


peace.

------------------------------------------------------------


wardemoc.jpg


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/J1zZNbqi53o&rel=1[/FLASH]

WAR ON DEMOCRACY DVD RIP


Use link below to download the full video in dvd quality, that you can burn to a disc and watch on your television


http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=239068



<p>
<hr noshade color="#d90000" size="12"></hr><p>
 
The United States is NOT going to let this mess slide without some type of (covert:hmm:) retaliation.:smh:

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Venezuela Congress urges World Bank court pullout
Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:58pm EST



CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuela's Congress wants to pull out of an international body arbitrating a multibillion-dollar fight with Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N: Quote, Profile, Research), part of a compensation battle that threatens already thorny ties with Washington.

In a largely symbolic motion published on Thursday, Congress called on President Hugo Chavez to withdraw from the World Bank's International Center for Settlement on Investment Disputes over a battle with Exxon on payment for an oil project nationalized last year.

Venezuela Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez criticizes previous governments for allowing international arbitration in disputes with foreign oil companies.

But far from threatening to pull out of the body, he has instead vowed to win the case, which could last several years.

The congressional motion also backed a conditional threat Chavez made last week to stop exporting oil to the United States and urged the government to prosecute former officials who signed "harmful" contracts with foreign oil companies.

While there is little sign Chavez will take up Congress' move, it helps amplify Venezuela's political noise against Exxon and Washington, which have been demonized by state media in the dispute as working to attack oil-producing nations.

Chavez, a foe of the United States, says Exxon Mobil's court victories which resulted in $12 billion in Venezuelan assets being temporarily frozen over the seizure are part of an "economic war" to unseat him directed by the White House.

On Wednesday, Washington backed Exxon Mobil's tough legal strategy "to get a just and fair compensation package," but denied it was trying to oust Chavez.

Exxon Mobil was pushed out of Venezuela along with ConocoPhillips (COP.N: Quote, Profile, Research) last year during a nationalization drive by Chavez, who wants to turn Venezuela into a socialist society. Conoco is still in talks over compensation. Continued...

http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN1446098720080214
 
What he is doing for his country is his business but 1 part that is often overlooked is how he is spending the money on his social programs but not using a lot of those profits to re-invest in the company. Their oil production has dropped every year he has been in office. We are quick to throw those phrases around about corporate greed but who is paying for all those oil rigs in the gulf. Some are built in my old home town and floated down the MS river to the Gulf. They are not cheap. Yes there are greedy corporations so instead of complaining try buying stock in them and get your cut.
 
Back
Top