Dyson: Don't be Sexual Rednecks

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Dyson: Don't be Sexual Rednecs


Michael Eric Dyson Calls Out Religious ‘Bigots’:​
Don’t Be ‘Sexual Rednecks’




Calling out author Sophia A. Nelson, Roland Martin and Pastor Jamal Bryant, who in an exclusive for Newsone said that he felt “jilted” by President Barack Obama‘s decision to show his support for marriage equality, Professor Michael Eric Dyson, filling in for host Ed Shultz on MSNBC’s “The Ed Show,” said that religion often cloaks bigotry and was the equivalent of being a “sexual redneck.” In the wake of his provocative appearance, we find out that “Twitter beef” isn’t just for kids as Dyson and Nelson get swept away in the phenomenon over Nelson’s religious stance on marriage equality.

Dyson, as he predicted in his Twitter timeline yesterday, went ”HARD on black homophobia and the moral hypocrisy of the black church.” Calling Nelson, Martin and Bryant out by name, he said, “Come on, Sophia, Roland and Jamal, <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">don’t use God to co-sign your bigotry.”</span> He then exposes the hypocrisy of the Black church at large by saying, <SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">”I ain’t never been to a Black church that turns down a gay tithe.”</span>


<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vqXlU6MTBhM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>​


After being called out by Nelson on Twitter for his “attack,” Dyson responded in a series of rapid-fire tweets that I’ve pieced together verbatim below:
“I think each of you believes that being gay is a “sin” — which in my mind is the first problem. Second you believe being gay is a “sin” on par with adultery and all the other sins in whose league its often mentioned. I think that’s problematic and antithetical to the ethic of love [of] Jesus’ teachings. Third, I think there is a blindness — an inevitable bigotry — in the belief that being [LGBT] by definition makes you a sinner. Since the bible has been similarly used to condemn blacks and women, just substitute black for gay and think how unacceptable is the notion that black folk are by definition “sinners.” That’s my bottom line. I was in no way trying to offend any of you. I have mixed it up on this topic with @jamalbryant on TV, and I continue to love and admire him. The same goes for @rolandsmartin and @sophiaredefined, both of whom are also my dear friends. I’d love to continue the conversation!”


Nelson is not entertaining Dyson though, saying that he said all that he needed to say on the Ed Show:
“Mike before you get started. You have had you say on national TV. Disgusted by your attack! The only talking I do next is on National TV-I have asked @msnbc to make this right.”



Nelson also released a statement, which reads in part:
“[Ms. Nelson] unequivocal in her public statements and writings, interviews that she supports her fellow Americans, who also happen to be Gay with regard to equal treatment under the law, fair pay, fair treatment in the workplace, health benefits and the right to visit their domestic partner in the hospital, share property rights, adopt children, etc. Ms. Nelson also supports Hate Crimes legislation, making it a crime to abuse, assault or bully Americans who are Gay, Lesbian, or Transgender.

“Ms. Nelson has also been equally clear as a Baptized Believer of over 33 years, who was raised in a Christian family, whose younger brother is an Evangelist/Minister of the Gospel, whose Grandfather (maternal) was a Minister of the Gospel, that she does NOT support Same Sex Marriage Rights as a matter of her religious faith. This is the same position that President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Vice President Biden, former President Bill Clinton and many public officials in the Democratic Party held for years, or in some instances still hold to this day.”

One of her followers asked the question, “I wonder why [Dyson] never called Obama a bigot?”


R&B singer, Eric Benet weighed on the controversy as well, siding with Dyson:
“Be deeply rooted in your faith without being deeply entrenched in bigotry! Michael Eric Dyson you betta PREACH!!!!”



Rev. Al Sharpton released the following statement in anticipation of this division:
“Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” As leaders in today’s Civil Rights Movement, we stand behind the President Obama’s belief that same sex couples should be allowed to join in civil marriages. We also affirm that individuals may hold different views on this issue but still work together towards our common goals: fair housing and equitable education, affordable health care and eradicating poverty, all issues of deep and abiding concern for our communities.

“President Obama stated his view that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry. This is a view that we concur with, because as civil rights leaders we cannot fight to gain rights for some and not for all. At the same time, we acknowledge that the President stated his personal opinion, which everyone is entitled to – both those who agree with him, like us, and those who disagree. The President made clear that his support is for civil marriage for same-sex couples, and he is fully committed to protecting the ability of religious institutions to make their own decisions about their own sacraments.

“There will be those who seek to use this issue to divide our community. As a people, we cannot afford such division. It is our hope that conversations on strengthening African American families continue in a civil and respectful way, on all sides, both with those who support the ability of same-sex couples to marry, and those who do not.”



In other words: Can’t we all just get along?

With the combustibility of intersecting homophobia and religion in the Black community combining with the opinion of the nation’s first African-American president — which in Black America apparently carries more weight than the laws as they are — that may just be too much to ask.


http://newsone.com/2015157/michael-e...xual-rednecks/


 
Dyson better slow his role. :lol:

For the most part, the church has been anti-gay for years. Dyson speaks of "sexual rednecks", but that has always been the case. White presidents didn't change rednecks and their church beliefs. Will a black president be able to change "black rednecks" belief on the issue? Every time something anti-gay is on the ballot, the black vote sides anti-gay. No different than "Earl" with the Confederate flag on the back of his pick up truck.

I just wanted to show up at churches today just to see what's being said. I wonder how many acted like this week didn't happen. The word of god is supposed to trump voting for what is in your best economic interest. Trumps race too.

Dyson is wrong about gay tithes. Sinners are always welcome to tithe. They are then preached to about how they need to change. Thieves. Adulterers. All welcome to tithe then ask forgiveness and change.
 
Will a black president be able to change "black rednecks" belief on the issue? Every time something anti-gay is on the ballot, the black vote sides anti-gay. No different than "Earl" with the Confederate flag on the back of his pick up truck.

I'm not certain that he has to -- change Black folk's beliefs on gay marriage.

Just the mention of 'gay' anything will get some people riled and misunderstanding. But, Barack only said what he personally believes -- and there is no legislation pending, no executive orders issued, and no proposed changes of any kind apparently in the offering.

Is there room for:

  • Disagreement over what the President personally believes; AND

  • Agreement/support with the President, otherwise ? ? ?
 
I'm not certain that he has to -- change Black folk's beliefs on gay marriage.

Just the mention of 'gay' anything will get some people riled and misunderstanding. But, Barack only said what he personally believes -- and there is no legislation pending, no executive orders issued, and no proposed changes of any kind apparently in the offering.

Is there room for:

  • Disagreement over what the President personally believes; AND

  • Agreement/support with the President, otherwise ? ? ?

For rational people there is, but we know how social conservatives are when it comes to such issues. As long no gays are getting married on the ship, they don't care if it sinks or not. Voters like myself are more concerned with fixing the holes in the ship.
 
So, this is somewhat of a test of "our" political sophistication ???

I just think it shows how we can have stupid issues divide us just like it happens with whites. It highlights the unsophisticated voters among us. With us, you have social "rednecks" lumped in with social liberals in one political party(democrats). Whites have two parties for that. Issues like this show we aren't as "borg-like" on political issues as we are led to believe.

Since I witnessed 2004, I always wondered why republicans didn't play this angle harder. I also wonder why now Obama? Is he trying to make this shit close?
 
Back
Top