Double Space Freddy & FDA now says Pfizer’s COVID-19 VACCINE Linked to Blood Clotting. [ADMIN UPDATE: DEBUNKED]
- Thread starter APOPHIS
- Start date
I know a few people who have had heart attacks and/or strokes recently without any family history or other predisposition.
I'm not jumping off a cliff but I will dig into this. I told these psuedo-intellectual 2 paid article reading niggas this shit wasn't well tested though. Caping for MRNA vaccines that they never heard of until 2021 like they knew what the fuck was going on... smh (I knew about MRNA back when they were using it for experimentation on Africans during the Ebola outbreak but these niggas don't read)
Last edited:
I gave up on arguing about the vaccine a while ago, but this guy is intentionally misleading people. First of all, I went to the link in youtube and this is from from last year so they didn't "just say it". When looking at the twitter profile, he has a picture of Mike Lindell - First red flag. Second of all, it seems like Kirsch has an axe to grind and it's something that he's been working on for awhile to prove something that just isn't true.
Link Here - It's Colin, but the article does a pretty good job of debunking Steve's claims (Steve is the guy in the youtube video that start at 4:20)
I know this is true...I been spitting this shit to Gimps... on this board for years...like a muffucka wit Aids can't talk about another muffucka with aids... Someone that has the Vax got to have a Good Outlook and can't say negativity about the Vax...I will say everyone that took it...ain't fucked up....just some people..there is no such thing as everyone can take the same drug... Killamayne is a Convict... taking no shit... brah
Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines do not kill more people than they save; FDA experts did not make this false claim
A debunked claim from over a year ago is hardly a “breaking report”
A debunked claim from over a year ago is hardly a “breaking report”
This shit is click bait. Man's is a gas lighter
With the
Wtf you doing?
Did you even make the smallest bit of effort to Google this and click maybe past the first 3 links?
This is old debunked bullsh*t
You way better bro.
This is why you can’t trust these people. You can’t trust anything that’s shifty. You put your trust in it then it stabs you in the back. They were telling you to take it now they’re telling you this shit. I will say it again, I’m glad I did not touch that shit.
Last edited:
^ What it looks like when you click on the thread and reply without reading a damn thing.
Epoch Times? Seriously? SMH
Dudes entire twitter timeline is just a stream of conspiracy theories.
It amazes me that every source posted gets completely disregarded as "fake news." They won't believe that there's a probability that the government lied. If it doesn't come from CNN or some other bullshit news outlet, it isn't true, according to 90% of this board. I never thought I'd see the day when Black folks completely trust the American
No, the FDA didn’t call the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe
The U.S. Food & Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory committee routinely holds virtual meetings to give guidance a
www.politifact.com
You know what, I'm not gonna back and forth with y'all. I'm in a chill mode. Just got head from a 25 year old.
There will come a time when this COVID cover up is revealed.
Untilthen, I hope none of ya'll is affected negatively by this fuckery.
Back to ripe titties I go.
There will come a time when this COVID cover up is revealed.
Untilthen, I hope none of ya'll is affected negatively by this fuckery.
Back to ripe titties I go.
These fools are just too proud. They don’t want to feel like they’ve been suckered so the pride kicks in which will make them not admit the shit. They still want to believe in and not accept that this government is corrupt like they’ve always been. They seem to think this government is not the same government flooding the black community with weapons, drugs, aids, etc.
Nope. The FDA did not say that. The risk for blood clots is FAR greater from covid than the super rare 2-20 in a million chance the vaccine causes an issue.
Kirsch has been spreading bullshit.
Again, this shit has been debunked. It’s over a year old.
I need some reputable sources… these inter webs are full of bullshit
we have to better about separating the shit from the substance.
Who from the FDA said this in the Video? Granted, I just watched the portion where Kirsch was running his mouth, but if you can give me the timestamp, I'll check it out.
I posted the link from Feb 2022 showing it was a comment made DURING an fda meeting by a known conspiracy theorist, not from an official of the fda.
It has word for word the comment in the other tweet:
"FDA in their virtual meeting yesterday: ‘We were falsely misled by (Pfizer) about the safety of the vaccine … heart attacks are 71x higher than other vaccines ... the vaccines are killing two people for every one life saved’ listen from the 4 hr 20 mark."
This stuff wouldn't be on twitter if Elon hadn't got rid of the moderators. Not every source is a trusted source. Epoch Times is known for their fuckery. Go back and search all the nonsense they said about Obama when he was president.
It was Kirsch that said it, not the fda.
I took the Pfizer vaccine. Anything potentially harmful about it, I want to know about as I already have a heart condition and high blood pressure. That's why I came in the thread. If this info was credible it would be one thing, but the entire basis of the tweet is an easily disproved lie. So we need to not freak people out or dissuade people from getting a vaccine that can save their lives because of intentionally misleading info. (By the twitter guy, not the OP.)
Hospitals are almost at capacity again. Solid truthful info is a must.
Agreed, don't post something and then when you're challenged on it say "oh well, im getting head anyway"..if you wanna troll, then say that, but i went and checked the youtube and all the facts because i wanna be sure, im about to go get my last booster of the holiday break...
BTW, the government is going to start mailing out free tests again..Link to full article here
Free COVID-19 Tests Are Available From the Government Again
1
Pete Grieve
Thu, December 15, 2022 at 12:46 PM EST·2 min read
Money; Shutterstock
Americans can once again order free COVID-19 tests from the federal government as a new round of distribution opens.
After stopping the initiative earlier this year, the Biden administration is relaunching the program “to stay ahead of an increase in COVID-19 cases this winter,” according to a Thursday announcement from the White House. Each household will again be able to order four free tests, which will be shipped by the U.S. Postal Service starting later this month.
From January to September, people were able to request rapid at-home COVID-19 tests from the COVID.gov website. More than 600 million free tests were delivered by mail through the government program. Distribution was ultimately paused because Congress didn’t approve funding to replenish the stockpile of tests, the White House said.
But on Thursday, the Biden administration said it’s using some remaining funds to reopen the program for a “limited round” of ordering.
However, it’s not yet clear how many total tests will be available in this round — so you might want to go ahead and order them now.
How to order free COVID-19 tests
To order the antigen tests, all you have to do is visit the government website and enter your name and residential address. You can also include your email if you’d like to get shipping updates.
This is the fourth round of free COVID-19 test distribution. The first two rounds of shipments included four tests each, and eight more tests were available for ordering in the third round, which began in May.
In a statement, the White House said “COVID-19 is not the disruptive force it once was” but reiterated that testing remains important, especially with families preparing to gather for the holidays. Officials encourage using the home tests if you feel symptoms that could be COVID-19, when you’re visiting vulnerable people indoors, and before and after holiday travel.
oh well....I'm staying tuned in...2023 is about to lay carnage... bookmark me..brah
I posted where this new study came from in another thread. This is a new study of 17 million people who took two doses.
This affected those over 65 mostly. So I know everyone on BGOL is under 64 so it don't affect "you", right...
=============
Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older
Available online 1 December 2022
Abstract
Background
Monitoring safety outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination is critical for understanding vaccine safety especially when used in key populations such as elderly persons age 65 years and older who can benefit greatly from vaccination. We present new findings from a nationally representative early warning system that may expand the safety knowledge base to further public trust and inform decision making on vaccine safety by government agencies, healthcare providers, interested stakeholders, and the public.
Methods
We evaluated 14 outcomes of interest following COVID-19 vaccination using the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data covering 30,712,101 elderly persons. The CMS data from December 11, 2020 through Jan 15, 2022 included 17,411,342 COVID-19 vaccinees who received a total of 34,639,937 doses. We conducted weekly sequential testing and generated rate ratios (RR) of observed outcome rates compared to historical (or expected) rates prior to COVID-19 vaccination.
Findings
Four outcomes met the threshold for a statistical signal following BNT162b2 vaccination including pulmonary embolism (PE; RR = 1.54), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; RR = 1.42), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; RR = 1.91), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP; RR = 1.44). After further evaluation, only the RR for PE still met the statistical threshold for a signal; however, the RRs for AMI, DIC, and ITP no longer did. No statistical signals were identified following vaccination with either the mRNA-1273 or Ad26 COV2.S vaccines.
Interpretation
This early warning system is the first to identify temporal associations for PE, AMI, DIC, and ITP following BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly. Because an early warning system does not prove that the vaccines cause these outcomes, more robust epidemiologic studies with adjustment for confounding, including age and nursing home residency, are underway to further evaluate these signals. FDA strongly believes the potential benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the potential risks of COVID-19 infection.
www.sciencedirect.com
This affected those over 65 mostly. So I know everyone on BGOL is under 64 so it don't affect "you", right...
=============
Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older
Available online 1 December 2022
Abstract
Background
Monitoring safety outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination is critical for understanding vaccine safety especially when used in key populations such as elderly persons age 65 years and older who can benefit greatly from vaccination. We present new findings from a nationally representative early warning system that may expand the safety knowledge base to further public trust and inform decision making on vaccine safety by government agencies, healthcare providers, interested stakeholders, and the public.
Methods
We evaluated 14 outcomes of interest following COVID-19 vaccination using the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data covering 30,712,101 elderly persons. The CMS data from December 11, 2020 through Jan 15, 2022 included 17,411,342 COVID-19 vaccinees who received a total of 34,639,937 doses. We conducted weekly sequential testing and generated rate ratios (RR) of observed outcome rates compared to historical (or expected) rates prior to COVID-19 vaccination.
Findings
Four outcomes met the threshold for a statistical signal following BNT162b2 vaccination including pulmonary embolism (PE; RR = 1.54), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; RR = 1.42), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; RR = 1.91), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP; RR = 1.44). After further evaluation, only the RR for PE still met the statistical threshold for a signal; however, the RRs for AMI, DIC, and ITP no longer did. No statistical signals were identified following vaccination with either the mRNA-1273 or Ad26 COV2.S vaccines.
Interpretation
This early warning system is the first to identify temporal associations for PE, AMI, DIC, and ITP following BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly. Because an early warning system does not prove that the vaccines cause these outcomes, more robust epidemiologic studies with adjustment for confounding, including age and nursing home residency, are underway to further evaluate these signals. FDA strongly believes the potential benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the potential risks of COVID-19 infection.
Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older
Monitoring safety outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination is critical for understanding vaccine safety especially when used in key populations such as…
did she have a good head on her shoulders... brah?
she got some full tits my nigg?
.
Last edited:
Similar threads
