Did You Know That Mushrooms Have More In Common With Humans Than Plants?

Gazoo

The Big Brain
Registered
Was speaking with my neighbor, a doctor in botany,, recently how the animal (human) world was connected to plant life, such as the carnivores plants (Venus Fly Trap).

Them he brought up the mushroom connection. That they are in fact more related to humans than plants . Did some research and investigation, and whattadayoujnow!

This, of course, doesn't go over well with my Christian or theistic friends.

Remember them little fellas next time you throw them in an omelet.



How Are Mushrooms More Similar to Humans than Plants?

29 Apr 2021 By John Staughton
Table of Contents
As it turns out, animals and fungi share a common ancestor, and branched away from plants at some point about 1.1 billion years ago. It was only later that animals and fungi separated, taxonomically speaking.
Think back to the last time you walked through a dense, overgrown forest. You probably saw all kinds of plant life – vines, bushes, moss, trees, and a healthy number of fallen logs. A forest is one of the best places to see the circle of life at its most beautiful, which is when life balances with death.
When things die in nature, they begin to break down and decompose, which is where fungi come into play.
Fungi belong to a kingdom all their own, just like animals, plants, bacteria, and protista (algae). They are eukaryotic organisms that absorb nutrients from other organic matter. When a tree falls, or an animal dies, fungi are typically the first on the scene to begin the natural process of decomposition.
Upon seeing a mushroom, most people would immediately view it as a vegetative organism, one that is closely related to plants. However, as recent research has shown, mushrooms are, in fact, more closely related to humans than to plants!

The classification of living organisms
Humans have always been fascinated by life in all its forms. Thousands of years ago, we classified life on earth into just two categories: plants and animals. Aristotle then further divided animals into those with and without blood and those in the land, sea, and air.
That rudimentary system remained in place until the 1600s. In the 18th century, Carol Linnaeus divided life into the kingdoms of animals and plants and then divided them further into different genera and species, which is why we have a two-part naming system in science (Homo sapiens, for example; Homo is the genus and sapiens is the species).
It wasn’t until the middle of the 19th century that single-celled organisms were finally given their due as a separate kingdom of life (Protista). Seventy years later, single-celled organisms were divided into eukaryotes and prokaryotes, so bacteria became the fourth kingdom of life. Although fungi had been recognized as a unique part of the animal kingdom, it was not until 1969 that it was divided into a separate kingdom. This five-kingdom system remains the most widely accepted format for classifying life on earth.

Photo Credit: LSkywalker / Shutterstock
Until recently, all classifications of life, including the expansion from two kingdoms to five kingdoms, were based on physical observations of how things looked, even under a microscope. This is how the closeness and relationships between species, genera, classes, orders, and kingdoms were decided. Given this, it comes as no surprise that most people classified fungi as plants for so long. The similarity in appearance is pretty clear; after all, some look like little red and white trees.


Using similarities in DNA to classify organisms
However, thanks to modern technology, the analysis of genetic relationships between species and organisms is now possible and has led to looking at relationships between forms of life differently. In 1990, Carl Woese proposed the “Three Domains System” of classification based on genetic similarities between organisms. The system shows a common ancestor of all life divided into three broad domains—Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes (the organisms with a nucleus to store their DNA).
By examining the genes of different species, both animal and fungi, mutational changes can be observed, and genealogical relationships can be determined that stretch back millions of years.
As it turns out, animals and fungi share a common ancestor and branched away from plants sometime around 1.1 billion years ago. Only later did animals and fungi separate on the genealogical tree of life, making fungi more closely related to humans than plants. Most likely, this common ancestor was a single-celled organism that exhibited sperm-like characteristics (like an animal) and then a later developmental stage with a stronger cell wall (fungi).

A phylogenetic tree based on rRNA analysis. On the right-hand side, notice the divergence of plants, fungi, and animals. (Photo Credit: Sting – fr: Sting/Wikimedia Commons)

Are mushrooms vegetables?
Simple answer? No, a mushroom is not a vegetable. Mushrooms are fruiting bodies of macroscopic filamentous fungi. When mycology (the study of fungi) first arose, it was a part of botany because fungi were regarded as primitive plants.
The main difference between a plant (vegetable) and a mushroom is how they acquire their food. Plants possess chlorophyll and produce their food through photosynthesis. Fungi exist on decaying material in nature. In addition, there are obvious structural differences, such as the lack of leaves, roots, and seeds. Thus, fungi now have their own kingdom based on the cellular organization.
However, this is the scientific side of things, but let’s take a look at the other side – food! In everyday life, we do not use science to classify our food. Tomatoes and cucumbers are scientifically the fruits of a plant, but we still call them vegetables. Similarly, mushrooms are not vegetables or fruits, or even meat. They are in themselves a different category, but for convenience, we lump them together with vegetables.
Different kinds of mushrooms have various health benefits. At one point in history, mushrooms were so highly regarded that it was actually forbidden for the common folk to eat them! They were reserved only for royal families.
The Mushrooms and Men have similar DNA.
Haven’t you ever noticed that eating a perfectly cooked portobello mushroom feels a lot closer to eating meat than a salad? Well, that isn’t exactly a scientific explanation of the connection, but genetic studies show that there may be a common ancestor from which both animals and fungi evolved.
In 1993, researchers Baldouf and Palmer published a paper, ‘Animals and fungi are each other’s closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins’. They compared 25 proteins and their DNA sequences between bacteria, plants, animals, and fungi. They found that animals and fungi exhibited similarities in certain proteins that plants and bacteria did not have. “This congruence among multiple lines of evidence strongly suggests, in contrast to the traditional and current classification, that animals and fungi are sister groups, while plants constitute an independent evolutionary lineage,” the researchers write in their paper.

Related Articles
A 2005 paper described how both animals and fungi are relatives of protists through protein analysis. Researchers are still teasing out the complex relationships between animals and fungi, but there is enough evidence to suggest that you and a mushroom have more in common than a plant has with a mushroom.
References
  1. Journal: Molecular Biology and Evolution
  2. Journal: PNAS
  3. University of California-Berkeley
 
q64crk81uv601.png
 
More about fungus.


A parasitic fungus figured out how to take over ants’ bodies in multiple climates

Katherine Ellen Foley
Health and science reporter
Published May 30, 2018This article is more than 2 years old.
The only thing scarier than a mind-controlling fungus is a mind-controlling fungus that has adapted its behavior to its environment.
Time to welcome Ophiocordyceps to your nightmares. It’s a genus of fungus, colloquially known as cordyceps, that lives in tropical and temperate climates. Rather than getting by in its own body, it prefers to take control of the body of a forest ant, then eat its host alive.
After infecting a host ant—usually while the insect is looking for food, a cordyceps starts to use the insect’s body like a super suit. Before it had no legs. Now it has six, which it can use to crawl to a specific spot on a plant above the ground ideal for cultivating the perfect growing conditions. After the cordyceps has purged the ant of all possible nutrients, the insect dies, and a fungal stalk grows from the ant’s head before the fungus rains its offspring down to the ground, hoping to infect more ants.


But Raquel Loreto, an entomologist at Penn State University, recently noticed something peculiar about the dying stage of this process, reports Wired. In South America, she saw infected ants would bite leaves about a foot above the ground. In Japan, she found that ants would wrap themselves around a twig much farther up, about six feet in the air. She knew it couldn’t be a coincidence—climbing up anything is abnormal behavior for ant—so she started to wonder: Was there something about the distance off the ground, or perhaps something about the material of the zombie ant’s ultimate landing spot, that was essential to the cordyceps’ survival?
Loreto took the problem to her team of researchers who gathered information about Ophiocordyceps from all over the northern and southern hemispheres, from every continent except Europe and Antarctica. Everywhere they looked, the same pattern emerged: In temperate forests, possessed ants were found dead on twigs. In tropical forests, ant corpses were on leaves.
The researchers concluded that this pattern has to do with the way trees grow in the different regions. The fungus needs to remain above the ground to release its spores. In warm tropical forests, leaves don’t fall, making them suitable targets for the ants to bite. In temperate forests, leaves cycle through the seasons, typically dropping in the autumn. In these cooler forests, the cordyceps “selectively favored the fungi to manipulate their host to bite onto twigs,” write the researchers in a paper published May 28 in the journal Evolution.

Usually when a trait like that evolves in a creature, it starts in a specific region and spreads as the species does. This doesn’t appear to be the case with cordyceps. Using genetic analyses, the researchers found that cordyceps actually evolved this same trait multiple times in various locations around the world.
The scientists don’t yet understand how the fungus can make its commandeered ant body choose between the leaf and stick. “How in the name of …whoever…does the fungus inside the body know what the difference between the leaf and the twig is?” David Hughes, a co-author of the paper, told Wired.
For now, it seems, that’ll be a mystery to be explored in our nightmares.
 
I don't care,I don't fuck with em at all....I don't even like to look or touch them shits.
 
Most humans have limited understanding and use classifications in order to make their lives simple.

A mushroom is more animal than it is plant.

Now imagine aliens out there that are intelligent mushrooms!




A mushroom is not a plant?
 
Makes me think of this episode of the Prodigal Son I seen on Hulu. Serial killer was planting people in the ground and growing mushrooms from them until they died.
 
I've been trying to find a place to hunt morel mushrooms for years. My father used to bring them home when I was a kid, but ....
 
A mushroom is more animal than it is plant.

Really?

A mushroom is more animal than it is plant.

Please help me understand this. Mushrooms are rooted
to the ground. They do not move; have no longs, eyes,
ears, no heart and no circulatory system. How are they
closer to animal than to plans that have roots just like
them?
 
Oh off the top of my head.
Fungi do not have roots as you stated.
They are their own classification. They are not under the plant classification.
The Fungi classification is closer to the Animal Classification than it is the Plant Classification.
Fungi have no chlorophyll and do not do photosynthesis.

Really?



Please help me understand this. Mushrooms are rooted
to the ground. They do not move; have no longs, eyes,
ears, no heart and no circulatory system. How are they
closer to animal than to plans that have roots just like
them?
 
Really?



Please help me understand this. Mushrooms are rooted
to the ground. They do not move; have no longs, eyes,
ears, no heart and no circulatory system. How are they
closer to animal than to plans that have roots just like
them?

@TENT did a better job than I could. It's one thing to understand something and another explain. Kind of like learning a new language. You can understand it, but not speak it.

Nevertheless here's another good link. One thing to remember is that experts in botany and biology tend to agree on this subject. Simply because we can't explain something doesn't mean it's not true.

 
Thing is alot of humans think they know everything so they don't explore the world with an inquisitive mindset.
This is how we got plumbers talking about viruses.
This is how we got people thinking they say UFOs.
This is how people think the earth is flat.
This is how people don't think there is climate change.

Facts will be in there face and they deny it.
 
Thing is alot of humans think they know everything so they don't explore the world with an inquisitive mindset.
This is how we got plumbers talking about viruses.
This is how we got people thinking they say UFOs.
This is how people think the earth is flat.
This is how people don't think there is climate change.

Facts will be in there face and they deny it.

Many people deny obvious facts out of pride and/or ignorance.

You don't believe in climate change?
 
Mushrooms are very interesting once you start studying them.
They are known to do everything from help dissolve plastics, be turned into bricks, clothes, as well as amazing things with our brain.
 
Back
Top