Democrats introduce bill requiring police to report all police shootings to DOJ

Art Vandelay

Importer/exporter
Registered
Democratic senators introduce bill requiring police to report all police shootings to DOJ
By Wesley Lowery
June 2


“Too many members of the public and police officers are being killed, and we don’t have reliable statistics to track these tragic incidents,” Boxer said in a statement. “This bill will ensure that we know the full extent of the problem so we can save lives on all sides.”

The nation has faced months of at-times tense discussions around issues of race and law enforcement following a series of deaths of black men and boys at the hands of police officers that became national stories -- including Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., Eric Garner in New York, Tamir Rice in Cleveland, Walter Scott in North Charleston, S.C., and Freddie Gray in Baltimore.

Those incidents have renewed calls, which have been made for years by some civil rights groups, for more standardized reporting of police use-of-force incidents. To date, there is no accurate, comprehensive data available about how many people are killed by American police officers each year.

In a release announcing the bill, Boxer and Booker specifically cite The Post's reporting -- which on Sunday revealed that at least 385 people have been shot and killed by police since January, putting the nation on pace to have more than double the number of fatal police shootings tallied on average by the federal government.

That piece is the latest in a yearlong effort by The Post to report on police accountability, which includes the creation of a database that will chronicle every fatal shooting by police officers in country this year.

On Monday, the Guardian unveiled a similar reporting project, The Counted, which aims to tally every person killed by a police officer -- by shooting, Taser or other death in custody -- in 2015.

According to The Guardian,

“Too many members of the public and police officers are being killed, and we don’t have reliable statistics to track these tragic incidents,” Boxer said in a statement. “This bill will ensure that we know the full extent of the problem so we can save lives on all sides.”
Aides to the senators said their bill, the Police Reporting of Information, Data and Evidence (Pride) Act, would force mandatory reporting on the same data being collected by The Counted, a database published by the Guardian beginning this week.

Who knows if this bill will actually pass, and if it does, when it will take effect. Thankfully, journalists and citizens have already taken this project into their own hands and will ensure that the data is strong moving forward. Ultimately though, it's in everyone's best interest for this reporting to mandatory so that no shootings, killings, or extreme uses of force by police go uncounted.​

“The first step in fixing a problem is understanding the extent of the problem you have. Justice and accountability go hand in hand -- but without reliable data it’s difficult to hold people accountable or create effective policies that change the status quo,” Booker said in a statement. “Our legislation is vital to ensuring we have the data required to make good decisions and implement reform measures that are balanced, objective, and protect the lives of police officers and the public.”

Some civil rights leaders have criticized Congress of passing little legislation in response to the unrest in Ferguson. Many activists who have led protests in the past year would consider the passage of legislation requiring detailed death in custody reporting to DOJ to be a major victory.

However, with Republicans in control of both the House and the Senate, Democratic legislative proposals face an uphill march toward passage.

"This is a step in the right direction. I'd have to read the bill to understand the details but the fact that there seems to be political will to establish a federal database is a very good sign," said David Klinger, a criminologist at the University of Missouri who has been fighting for more than a decade for better reporting on police use of force incidents.
 

Requiring that kind of reporting could help track the problem; but seems to me a national training regimen teaching better shoot-don't shoot tactics based on legal standards deemphasizing the notion, for example, that a cop confronting a subject 30 feet or more away with a knife is justified in using lethal force against that subject , without first requiring, or at least urging, that some other non-lethal force be employed to subdue that subject ???

I'm wondering if the "law" itself may be a greater contributor to quick triggered officers than, perhaps, the attitude of some of the officers themselves. In other words, "the law" might be providing cover for and giving encouragement to many officers in situations where its questionable whether a reasonable officer should be entitled to perceive that his life is in danger.

 
Perhaps another provision would be one that leaves all police killing cases open for the rest is the officer's life. If, for instance, a white cop kills a black man in the line of duty and years later is found guilty of racial discrimination that killing needs to be rexamined immediately.
,
 
Back
Top