DARFUR' Arab women singers complicit in rape agains't black

london

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sudan/story/0,14658,1264901,00.html


Arab women singers complicit in rape, says Amnesty report

Jeevan Vasagar in Nairobi and Ewen MacAskill
Tuesday July 20, 2004
The Guardian

While African women in Darfur were being raped by the Janjaweed militiamen, Arab women stood nearby and sang for joy, according to an Amnesty International report published yesterday. The songs of the Hakama, or the "Janjaweed women" as the refugees call them, encouraged the atrocities committed by the militiamen.
The women singers stirred up racial hatred against black civilians during attacks on villages in Darfur and celebrated the humiliation of their enemies, the human rights group said.


"[They] appear to be the communicators during the attacks. They are reportedly not actively involved in attacks on people, but participate in acts of looting."
Amnesty International collected several testimonies mentioning the presence of Hakama while women were raped by the Janjaweed. The report said:"Hakama appear to have directly harassed the women [who were] assaulted, and verbally attacked them."

During an attack on the village of Disa in June last year, Arab women accompanied the attackers and sang songs praising the government and scorning the black villagers.

According to an African chief quoted in the report, the singers said: "The blood of the blacks runs like water, we take their goods and we chase them from our area and our cattle will be in their land. The power of [Sudanese president Omer Hassan] al-Bashir belongs to the Arabs and we will kill you until the end, you blacks, we have killed your God."

The chief said that the Arab women also racially insulted women from the village: "You are gorillas, you are black, and you are badly dressed."

The Janjaweed have abducted women for use as sex slaves, in some cases breaking their limbs to prevent them escaping, as well as carrying out rapes in their home villages, the report said.

The militiamen "are happy when they rape. They sing when they rape and they tell that we are just slaves and that they can do with us how they wish", a 37-year-old victim, identified as A, is quoted as saying in the report, which was based onmore than 100 testimonies from women in the refugee camps in neighbouring Chad.

Pollyanna Truscott, Amnesty International's Darfur crisis coordinator, said the rape was part of a systematic dehumanisation of women. "It is done to inflict fear, to force them to leave their communities. It also humiliates the men in their communities."

The UN estimates that up to 30,000 people have been killed in Darfur, and more than a million have been forced to flee their homes. Peace talks between the Sudanese government and two rebel movements broke down on Saturday when the rebel groups walked out, saying the government must first disarm the Janjaweed.

Another human rights organisation, Human Rights Watch, today publishes alleged Sudanese government documents showing that it was much more closely involved with the Janjaweed than it has so far admitted.

The documents, which Human Rights Watch said it had obtained from the civilian administration in Darfur and are dated February and March this year, call for "provisions and ammunition" to be delivered to known Janjaweed militia leaders, camps and "loyalist tribes".

One document orders all security units in the area to tolerate the activities of Musa Hilal, the alleged Janjaweed leader in north Darfur interviewed by the Guardian last week.

Peter Takirambudde, the executive director of Human Rights Watch's Africa division, said: "These documents show that militia activity has not just been condoned, it's been specifically supported by Sudan government officials."

The official government line is that it did not arm or support the Janjaweed, though its presence was useful in helping to combat rebels in Darfur.
 
Greed said:
hey man, arabs are our brothers of color.

stop posting this propaganda.
Ah ah ah
when it comes to racism agains't blacks, arabs are worst than white people
go to yemen, saudi arabia, mauritania or Morocco and you will see if really we are brothers
 
london said:
Ah ah ah
when it comes to racism agains't blacks, arabs are worst than white people
go to yemen, saudi arabia, mauritania or Morocco and you will see if really we are brothers

Your right but alot of people here don't believe that, according to them arabs love blacks and we are together.
 
some of you stupid muthafuckas cant comprehend that the "arabs" and the "blacks" in sudan look the fuckin same- the difference is religion - animists/christians etc versus muslims and muslim converts

GF should remember that from last time he chimed in on that bullshit



for the record

refugees - not arab not muslim
09.29.04_Darfur_350.jpg




janjaweed
100804_sudan6.jpg


musa_hilal_janjaweed.jpg



these arent what are generally considered arabs in america, unless you consider any person who calls themself an arab an arab

this is a religious war and a purging by the shit head sudanese leaders who are no better than slobodan milosevic or hitler

at least the UN and the world are pressing this important issue like Iraq :rolleyes: not enough oil or the victims are too dark i guess-oooppps the UN is in haiti but people in haiti arent even dying like in sudan right?

if youre talking color and janjaweed arabs vs black - youre talkin out of your ass (unless you want to discuss why sudanese muslims dont want to be africans so bad)
 
you really are unfortunate.

what news report said the janjaweed isnt a mostly arab militia.
what news report said the janjaweed isnt looking to ethnically clense the african population and has admitted it.
why would your beloved anti american amnesty international lie and say arab women specifically are singing when specifically black african women are being raped.

thats one problem with separate threads with these subjects and losing the old board archives.

people can have bad memories when they want to.
 
head of the janjaweed
musa_hilal_janjaweed.jpg


most of the janjaweed are sudanese muslims and newly converted muslims who dont feel like getting burned to death or shot

post some fair skinned non african dark skinned "arab" janjaweed

i dont love AI

post some pics of the "arab women" who are singing

you have the misfortune of being a dumbass

why are dark skinned sudanese non-muslims who convert to islam and claim to be muslims and join the janjaweed "arabs" and their neighbors who do not convert who are slain "africans"?

here you go - here are some of your "brothers of color"

100804_sudan6.jpg


Sudan-Janjaweed.jpg



looks like black on black crime to me

if you want to hate on "arabs" at least bring up some legitimate shit like the saudis banning too many nigerians from the hajj

just say the shit is muslims against whoever - the arab shit is like one group of black people in america claimin to be mexicans or some shit

either iraqis arent arabs or these sudanese arent - which is it- both are not originally from the arabian peninsula
 
not so oddly enough i'm not surprised by your hypocrisy.

i dont remember such a burden of proof when amnesty international said america was equivalent to the soviet union.

but all of a sudden almost 4 years of consistent reporting by the international media and NGOs saying arabs are leading this charge in a quoted effort to conduct a campaign of ethnic cleansing is a big ass lie.

where would i be without BGOL.
 
Makkonnen said:
some of you stupid muthafuckas cant comprehend that the "arabs" and the "blacks" in sudan look the fuckin same- the difference is religion - animists/christians etc versus muslims and muslim converts

GF should remember that from last time he chimed in on that bullshit



for the record

refugees - not arab not muslim
09.29.04_Darfur_350.jpg




janjaweed
100804_sudan6.jpg


musa_hilal_janjaweed.jpg



these arent what are generally considered arabs in america, unless you consider any person who calls themself an arab an arab

this is a religious war and a purging by the shit head sudanese leaders who are no better than slobodan milosevic or hitler

at least the UN and the world are pressing this important issue like Iraq :rolleyes: not enough oil or the victims are too dark i guess-oooppps the UN is in haiti but people in haiti arent even dying like in sudan right?

if youre talking color and janjaweed arabs vs black - youre talkin out of your ass (unless you want to discuss why sudanese muslims dont want to be africans so bad)

Seriously dude fuck you, fuck you, your stupid enough to sit here and think arabs are your friends and thats fine, there are arabs that are black you stupid fuck, I've lived in arab countries and seen arabs disrciminate against blacks from africa, youve got your head so far in Bushs ass you can't see anything else. black muslims ket killed everyday in Sudan, I don't even care if I get banned for this shit but you need to get straightened out for real.
 
Gods_Favorite said:
Seriously dude fuck you, fuck you, your stupid enough to sit here and think arabs are your friends and thats fine, there are arabs that are black you stupid fuck, I've lived in arab countries and seen arabs disrciminate against blacks from africa, youve got your head so far in Bushs ass you can't see anything else. black muslims ket killed everyday in Sudan, I don't even care if I get banned for this shit but you need to get straightened out for real.
dear dumbass,

arab= person from the arabian peninsula
african= person from africa

there are africans in arabia and arabs in africa but my point is that these so called "arabs" are dark skinned africans who are muslim and view being "african" as something negative

black muslims get killed everyday in sudan- okay just show me some evidence that they werent janjaweed or rebels or people with tribal beef and that the janjaweed killed them

personally i could give a fuck if arabs threw shit at you etc - africans receive hostility around the world from every race of asshole that exists. I live in a mostly white european country and seen europeans discriminate against blacks from africa, youve got your head so far up your own ass you can't see anything else. black people get killed everyday on Earth. you shouldnt be banned for being a moron, you should be pitied.

There is a civil war in Sudan and there also is janjaweed killing mufuckas over nothing, land, cattle, property to plunder, bitches, religion and all kinds of other shit that comes to their fucked up lil minds, but to characterize the shit as arabs killin africans when the main killing force is made up of many dark skin africans who call themselves "arabs" is bullshit. Either that or the word "arab" is fuckin meaningless. Maybe tomorrow they'll call themselves Chinese.

030409_sudan_pres_600.jpg



straighten yourself out, get your commanders to go help some people who really need fuckin help in sudan

who the fuck in this world shows our people mad love? we dont even show each other love. im not gonna hate all arabs, just like I wont hate all white people, or black people, even though some of all those types are fuckin savages and idiots who treat my people bad.

Go put on a red jump suit and walk through Watts all day and I'll bet you think those fuckin a-rabs loved your black ass. lmao

youre on earth bitch get over it
 
<h2>Doctors Without Borders Aid Worker Describes Dire Humanitarian Situation in Southern Sudan</h2>
<p>Tuesday, January 10th, 2006</p>

<small>http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/10/1455255</small>

<p>In Sudan, a peace agreement that halted a 21-year civil war between the Khartoum government and Southern rebels remains on shaky ground. We speak with the Operational Director for Sudan Medecins Sans Frontieres who recently returned from the southern region of Sudan about the humanitarian situation.</p>
<p></p><hr>
As we continue looking at Sudan, we focus on the conflict between the north and the south of the country. A year ago, the ruling National Congress Party (NCP) and the southern Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) signed the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in Kenya.
<p>
This was viewed by many as an end to the 21-year civil war that has claimed over two million lives, according to UN estimates. It was Africa's longest and costliest civil war. The SPLM fought against the Islamic government in Khartoum, seeking more autonomy for the people of southern Sudan, who are mostly Christian or animist.
</p>
<p>
And now, a year after the peace deal, millions of Sudanese still live in fear of violence. A humanitarian crisis stretches on, as aid workers report that 25% of children in the south die before they reach the age of five.
</p><p>
Sudan's president Omar al-Bashir signed a power-sharing constitution last year that created the office of vice president for the country. The peace agreement also promised religious freedom and an equal share of oil wealth to the south.
</p><p>
Former SPLM leader John Garang was sworn in as Sudan's first Vice president in July. His sudden death a few weeks later in a helicopter crash brought the peace deal to a halt. Riots broke out among Christians and Arabs in the country killing 130 and injuring more than 100. Since then, the SPLM has been less active at the national level.
</p><p>
The peace agreement is still in place, but only tentatively. Gunbattles continue between rival clans and southerners have accused the Khartoum government of arming militias and rival clans to terrorize southerners. Some 500,000 southern Sudanese are expected to return home this year, but communities reportedly still lack food and water.
</p><p></p><ul>
<li><b>Pete Buth</b>, the Operational Director for Sudan <a href="http://www.msf.org">Medecins Sans Frontieres</a>. He recently returned from the southern region of Sudan.</li>
 
In Tape, Bin Laden Urges Fighters to Sudan

In Tape, Bin Laden Urges Fighters to Sudan
By SALAH NASRAWI, Associated Press Writer
28 minutes ago

Osama bin Laden issued ominous new threats in an audiotape broadcast Sunday, saying the West was at war with Islam and calling on his followers to go to Sudan to fight a proposed U.N. force.

In his first new message in three months, bin Laden said the West's decision to cut off funds to the Palestinians because their Hamas leaders refuse to recognize Israel proved that the United States and Europe were conducting "a Zionist crusader war on Islam."

"The blockade which the West is imposing on the government of Hamas proves that there is a Zionist crusader war on Islam," said the speaker on the tape broadcast by the Al-Jazeera network.

"I say that this war is the joint responsibility of the people and the governments. While the war continues, the people renew their allegiance to their rulers and politicians and continue to send their sons to our countries to fight us."

The voice on the tape sounded strong and resembled that on previous recordings attributed to bin Laden. There was no way to independently verify the authenticity of the tape.

"We are aware of the tape and a technical analysis of the recording is being conducted," a U.S. intelligence official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity.

Israeli government spokesman Raanan Gissin said bin Laden had decided to attack Israel to deflect growing Arab animosity toward al-Qaida.

"When he attacks Israel, this is something the Arab world can agree upon," Gissin said. "He has been criticized for the destruction and carnage he's causing the Muslim nation. He's looking for another justification ...

"Criticizing Israel sounds more politically correct."

Al-Qaida is believed to have no direct links to Hamas, which is an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood, but they share an anti-Israel ideology that calls for the destruction of the Jewish state.

Recent media reports in the Middle East have said al-Qaida is building cells in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Sudan.

Israel has indicted two West Bank militants for al-Qaida membership and a Palestinian security official has acknowledged al-Qaida is "organizing cells and gathering supporters," although Israeli officials say the inroads appear preliminary.

A Hamas spokesman said the militant group's ideology is vastly different from al-Qaida's but noted that international sanctions on the Palestinian government would naturally cause anger among some Muslims.

"It's natural that this tension is going to create an impression that there is a Western-Israeli alliance working against the Palestinians," Sami Abu Zuhri said, adding that Hamas is interested in having good relations with the West.

Bin Laden also addressed the conflict in Sudan, where he was based before being expelled under threats from the United States. He then moved to Afghanistan and is believed to be hiding out in the rugged mountains on the Pakistani side of their common border.

In Washington, U.S. intelligence officials said bin Laden is separated from his top deputy and, in a sign he has to be careful about whom he trusts, surrounded by fellow Arabs.

His No. 2, Ayman al-Zawahri, is hiding in a more settled area along the border, also surrounded by al-Qaida operatives from Egypt, the officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release the information.

A three-year conflict between Darfur's rebels and the Arab-dominated central government has caused about 180,000 deaths — most from disease and hunger — and displaced 2 million people.

The United Nations has described the conflict as the world's gravest humanitarian crisis. The United States has described it as genocide.

Negotiators are trying to broker a peace deal between warring factions by an April 30 deadline. Members of the African Union have agreed in principle to hand over peacekeeping duties to the United Nations beginning Sept. 30.

"I call on mujahedeen and their supporters, especially in Sudan and the Arab peninsula, to prepare for long war again the crusader plunderers in Western Sudan. Our goal is not defending the Khartoum government but to defend Islam, its land and its people," bin Laden purportedly said.

"I urge holy warriors to be acquainted with the land and the tribes in Darfur."

Al-Qaida has targeted Western forces in Africa before — including its attacks against U.S. troops trying to bring peace to Somalia in 1993.

Al-Jazeera apparently had the tape long enough to make significant edits, with its news reader providing substantial transition and background comments between excerpts from bin Laden.

It was the first purported new message from bin Laden since Jan. 19. In that audiotape, he warned that his fighters were preparing new attacks in the United States but offered the American people a "long-term truce" without specifying the conditions.

That tape was posted in full on a Web site a month later and included a vow by the terrorist chieftain never to be captured alive.

"I have sworn to only live free. Even if I find bitter the taste of death, I don't want to die humiliated or deceived," bin Laden said in that previous 11-minute, 26-second tape.

In the message broadcast Sunday, bin Laden also called for a global Muslim boycott of American goods similar to the recent boycott of Danish products after the publication there of caricatures of the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.

He also said the artists who drew those offending cartoons should be handed over to him for trial and punishment.

The Al-Jazeera news reader said bin Laden, in a portion of the tape not aired by the Qatar-based broadcaster, scoffed at Saudi King Abdullah for his calls for a "dialogue among civilizations" and blasted liberal-minded Arab writers for taking part in the Western cultural invasion of Muslim lands.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060423...TtI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
US readies Darfur sanctions vote at UN this week

US readies Darfur sanctions vote at UN this week
By Evelyn Leopold
32 minutes ago

The United States plans a U.N. Security Council vote on Tuesday that would impose sanctions on four Sudanese for abuses in Darfur, despite opposition from Russia and China that could kill the measure, council members said.

To ease the concerns of African nations, the council expects to approve at the same time a Tanzanian-drafted statement supporting the African Union's peace talks between the Khartoum government and two rebel groups, held in Abuja, Nigeria.

But the resolution, which would impose a travel ban and a freeze on financial assets on the four Sudanese, the first sanctions by the council on participants in the Darfur conflict, may be thwarted by Russia and China, who contend the resolution could interfere in the peace process.

"As a general principle, we always have difficulty with sanctions, whether it is in this case or other cases," China's U.N. Ambassador Wang Guangya said last week. "We believe that the resolution like this might harden the positions of some of the parties to the negotiations."

China has oil interests in Sudan and supplies weapons to the Khartoum government. But Wang said, "This story has always been played up, but I think we have to be constructive as far as Sudan is concerned."

Supporting Russia and China is Qatar, the only Arab member of the 15-nation council.

The Security Council approved a resolution in March 2005, calling for the sanctions on individuals who defy peace efforts, violate human rights or conduct military overflights in Darfur. Russia, China and Islamic nations abstained.

The new resolution, drafted by the United States, is co-sponsored by Britain, Argentina, Denmark, France, Japan, Peru and Slovakia. A resolution needs a minimum of nine votes and no veto from its five permanent members for adoption.

SANCTIONS WILL BE HARD TO ENFORCE

The Darfur conflict erupted in 2003 when mostly non-Arab tribes took up arms, accusing the Arab-dominated government of neglect.

Khartoum retaliated by arming mainly Arab militia, known as Janjaweed, who began a campaign of murder, rape, arson and plunder that drove more than 2 million villagers into squalid camps in Darfur and in neighboring Chad. Khartoum denies responsibility.

The four Sudanese men targeted for sanctions include a Sudanese government official, a pro-government militia member and two rebel leaders. None are involved in the Abuja peace talks. Britain had proposed a longer list but the United States whittled down the roster.

The sanctions resolution will be hard to enforce and at a minimum stigmatizes those on the list, which U.S. Ambassador John Bolton says calls a preliminary roster.

The four are: Maj.-Gen. Gaffar Mohamed El-Haassan, the former Sudan Air Force commander for the western military region, which includes Darfur; Sheikh Musa Hilal, chief of the Jalul Tribe in North Darfur and a pro-Sudan government or Janjaweed paramilitary leader; Adam Yacub Shant, a rebel Sudanese Liberation Army Commander; and Gabril Abdul Kareem Badri, whose name has also been spelled Badi, a field commander of the rebel National Movement for Reform and Development.

Despite the escalating conflict, the United Nations has not gotten Sudan's consent for a peacekeeping mission that would absorb the current under-financed African Union force of 7,000 in Darfur by the end of the year.

On Sunday, Osama bin Laden in an audiotape broadcast, denounced a so-called Western-backed U.N. peacekeeping force, which is already in southern Sudan.

He accused the United States of exploiting difference between Sudanese tribes "all in preparation to send crusader troops to occupy the region and steal its oil" through "its international tool such as the United Nations."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060424...jtZ.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
Re: US readies Darfur sanctions vote at UN this week

<font size="5"><center>In Darfur, a Grim New Turn </font size></center>


23sudan.xlarge1.jpg

A rebel soldier passed the bodies of Sudanese forces near the Chad-Sudan border last week. They were among dozens killed in a rebel offensive

The New york Times
By LYDIA POLGREEN
Published: October 23, 2006
ON THE CHAD-SUDAN BORDER, Oct. 20 — Haroun Abdullah Kabir stepped from one bloodied corpse to another on the parched, rocky battlefield. He searched the soldiers’ decomposing faces for an aquiline nose, fair complexion or fine, straight hair: telltale Arab features.

Instead Mr. Kabir, a field commander of the Darfur rebels fighting the Arab-dominated Sudanese government, found among the Sudanese soldiers his men had felled only the dark-skinned faces of southern Sudanese and Darfurians. He looked away in disgust.

“You see, they send black men to kill black men,” he said. “We are waiting for them to send Arabs for a real fight.”

This is the new battlefield in Darfur, a blood-soaked land in which at least 200,000 people have died since early 2003, many of hunger and disease, as a result of a campaign of violence the Bush administration and others have called genocide.

For the first time in more than two years, rebels fighting the government for more autonomy are making brazen, direct and successful attacks on soldiers, and are declaring that all previous cease-fires are no longer in effect.

The latest peace agreement, signed in May and heavily backed by the United States but approved by only one rebel faction and the Sudanese government, is in disarray.

The government vows to crush the rebellion, and as its military struggles to fend off attacks, it will likely turn again to Arab militias called janjaweed to wage its counterinsurgency campaign, analysts say.

A visit to the site of the newest fighting, the first by a journalist, revealed a hardening conflict that is increasingly taking place along porous borders among some of the least stable countries in Africa, threatening to ignite a wide conflagration in the heart of the continent.

The Darfur rebels are flush with weapons taken from the Sudanese military in raids and bought through allies in Chad and Eritrea. They say that because Sudan has blocked a United Nations force from entering Darfur to protect the 2.5 million people forced from their homes there and in eastern Chad, they have a duty to stop attacks on non-Arab tribes.

“The international community will not do it,” said Gen. Khatir Toor Khala, a rebel field commander based on the border. “So it is for us to protect the innocent civilians of Darfur.”

With the two sides apparently bent on all-out war, and millions of displaced people and refugees caught in the middle, the people of Darfur and the aid workers who have been trying to help them await the next, seemingly inevitable onslaught.

“We don’t know what will happen next, we only fear for our lives,” said Kaltuma Ardy, who fled attacks by the janjaweed on her village in Darfur near the Chad border three years ago. She now lives in Oure Cassoni refugee camp, a few miles from the site of the battle between rebels and government soldiers. “We need the U.N. to come and help us so we can have peace and go back home.”

The prospect of new talks to settle the crisis has dimmed, and the involvement of Chad and now the Central African Republic, where Sudan reportedly supports rebels hoping to topple Chad’s government, is spawning a complex, connected set of conflicts.

Now that the rains have ended, and the rushing seasonal rivers have dried up, clearing the way for the truck-mounted guns that are at the heart of any African ground war, combat has started anew.

The rebel alliance, now known as the National Redemption Front, has inflicted at least two humiliating defeats on the Sudanese Army.

One of those battles took place on Oct. 7 in an army camp 13 miles northeast of Bahai, a sleepy border outpost in Chad that is home to one of the region’s largest refugee camps. The camp was strewn with the bodies of dozens of Sudanese soldiers.

Some lay in contorted poses of flight, others were in jumbled heaps in trenches, apparently gunned down in their fighting positions — a still-ticking watch and shattered eyeglasses glinting in the sun. At least one soldier appeared to have been killed while still in bed, sprawled half on, half off a bed in a straw hut, his trousers unbuckled, swollen belly bursting forth. Another seemed to have been caught while playing cards, a jack of spades lay just beyond his extended index finger.

Rebel commanders led a reporter and a photographer to the spot of their triumph clearly wanting to trumpet their victory, but they also seemed disappointed that almost all of the dead soldiers appeared to be non-Arab recruits, mostly southerners and Darfurians. “All of them are Sudanese, they are black people, they are our brothers,” Mr. Kabir said. “The government sent them here to kill us, but we pity them. The janjaweed don’t like to die and make war with us. They are cowards attacking women and children.”

The rebels had picked the camp clean of matériel, carrying off several senior Sudanese field commanders as prisoners, they said, as well as caches of heavy weapons, machine guns, fuel tankers and pickup trucks.

At a hide-out a few miles away, soldiers preened with their new weapons: Chinese-made rockets, grenade launchers and antitank guns.

“We took this from Sudan, and we will use it to kill them,” boasted Salah Arjah Boush, a rebel fighter, cradling a small gray rocket like a baby in his arms.

Adam Shogar, a spokesman for the National Redemption Front based in Ndjamena, the capital of Chad, said that the new rebel alliance was not bound by any previous cease-fires and was ready to fight if the government refused to open new negotiations. The May agreement was not acceptable, he said.

“It is all-out war,” Mr. Shogar said. “There are no agreements.”

Exactly what shape the conflict will take is not clear, and the methods the government and rebels choose to attack each other will have grim consequences for the millions of Darfurians pushed from their homes.

The battle in Darfur has long been a proxy, fought with villages and towns as battlefields and civilians as its primary victims. Rebel groups — at least half a dozen factions and splinter groups have surfaced since the conflict began — occupy villages, which the government attacks by air with Antonov bombers and gunships. The rumble of the aircraft gives the fighters plenty of time to escape, but the less-mobile civilians bear the brunt of the aerial attacks.

Because Sudan’s large army is mostly made up of non-Arab foot soldiers who are unwilling to carry out brutal counterinsurgency tactics on fellow non-Arabs, the government has used Arab militias as ground troops in Darfur, paying them in cash and loot from the villages they raid. But now the fighting appears to be entering a new phase, in which the rebel groups, somewhat unified militarily under the banner of the National Redemption Front, are making increasingly brazen direct attacks on government troops.

The government is likely to respond to this new boldness with familiar tactics, said Colin Thomas-Jensen, Africa advocacy and research manager at the International Crisis Group, an independent organization that seeks to resolve armed conflict.

“Clearly Khartoum is still intent on pursuing a military solution, and just because the latest offensive seems to have hit a roadblock doesn’t mean they are going to give up,” Mr. Thomas-Jensen said. “The strategy in the past has always been to arm and train and support local militia groups. In all of this the consequences from a humanitarian standpoint are devastating. In Darfur it is ultimately among the civilians that there will be the greatest cost.”

So far, in this part of Darfur, the response has been mostly aerial attacks. Bombers have flown incessantly over Bahai and other border towns, dropping bombs on areas suspected of being rebel hide-outs.

The rebellion is bracing for a new onslaught from the government and its allied militias, meeting in Birmaza, a town in North Darfur, to cement their alliance and discuss strategy, said Jar al-Nabi Abdul Karim, a commander of the National Redemption Front, in a satellite telephone interview from there. “We are united, and we are strong,” he said. “We are ready to fight.”

With the peace agreement signed in May moribund, and with those who declined to sign returning to the battlefield, finding a way out of Darfur’s crisis seems harder than ever, Mr. Thomas-Jensen said.

“It is going to be difficult, and is going to require a great deal of diplomacy and pressure,” he said. “For the rebels, a lot of cajoling, and for the government, they have got to be under pressure. And you need a strong mediator, someone who can knock heads if necessary. It is not going to be easy, but ultimately there is no way out of this conflict without a renewed political process.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/23/w...8597dd84fab&hp&ex=1161662400&partner=homepage
 
For years I monitored the situation in southern Sudan. I was swayed by certain Black American leaders - well, specifically Louis Farrakhan - that the situation there was a "police" problem of banditry. But I came to realise that the distance between Khartum (the capital) in the far north and the Ugandan border is as far as Miami is from Maine. It is not for us here in the west to question those people's perception that there are differences, it is important for us to understand that - if we accept the German scientist Blumenbach's and other's race classifications of Negroid and Hamitic - that the people who were enslaved in the west are "negroid" and we must choose sides.

In the south "negroid" peoples have fought for 1600 years against invasion and enslavement from the north by "Arabs" both from the Arabian peninisula and ethnic Arabs who are descendents from those people and their allies. It is as real as that. We wouldn't know the difference - but they would.

The negroid Christians in the south like Manute Bol (remember him?) will tell you that if you'd listen. But for the past 20 years, Farrakhan and Jessie Jackson have accepted money and gifts and trips by the government in Khartum - they've been bought off. So our perception has been crafted by sellouts.


Darfur is slightly different, the people are negroid, but they are Muslim. If They call the Janjaweed "Arabs" who are we to argue?
 
london said:
Ah ah ah
when it comes to racism agains't blacks, arabs are worst than white people
go to yemen, saudi arabia, mauritania or Morocco and you will see if really we are brothers

Correct, I've been in that region and they treat blacks like animals. The Arabs are funding the war. Saudi has it's hands all in this conflict. Arabic countries are enslaving Africans and transporting them to other countries as prostitutes.

http://members.aol.com/casmasalc/african_slave_trade.html

http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Classroom/9912/easterntrade.html

I can understand the ignorance on this board about Arabs. Most Americans get a simple and distorted picture of the region. They identify with the poor Arabs that are being run over by the jews. The history of Arabs towards blacks is far darker. Unlike Euro's that have come to tolerate blacks in society Arabs will never see you on equal footing. In a region that has so many Africans working and in the religion you will not see an African with an arab women. They see Africans as dogs to do simple task. Outside of trash picking you never saw an African doing police or military work. This in a country were most of the military are third country nationals "hired guns".
 
<font size="5"><center>Why Has the U.S. Not Helped in Darfur?</font size><font size="6">
Osama bin Laden</font size></center>


Washington Post
By John Prendergast
Sunday, November 19, 2006; Page B01

Early in his first term, President Bush received a National Security Council memo outlining the world's inaction regarding the genocide in Rwanda. In what may have been a burst of indignation and bravado, the president wrote in the margin of the memo, "Not on my watch."

Five years later, and nearly four years into what Bush himself has repeatedly called genocide, the crisis in Sudan's Darfur region is intensifying without a meaningful response from the White House. Perhaps Harvard professor Samantha Power's tongue-in-cheek theory is correct: The memo was inadvertently placed on top of the president's wristwatch, and he didn't want it to happen again. But if Bush's expressions of concern for the victims in Darfur are genuine, then why isn't his administration taking real action?

The answer is one of the great untold stories of this young century, one in which human rights principles clash with post-9/11 counterterrorism imperatives. During my visits to Darfur in the past few months, I've heard testimony from Darfurians that villages are still burned to the ground, women are still gang-raped by Janjaweed militias and civilians are still terrorized by the Sudanese air force's bombings. As Darfur descends further into hell, all signs explaining the United States' pathetic response point to one man: Osama bin Laden.

In the early 1990s, bin Laden lived in Sudan, the guest of the very regime responsible for the Darfur atrocities. At the time, bin Laden's main local interlocutor was an official named Salah Abdallah Gosh. After 9/11, however, Gosh became a more active counterterrorism partner: detaining terrorism suspects and turning them over to the United States; expelling Islamic extremists; and raiding suspected terrorists' homes and handing evidence to the FBI. Gosh's current job as head of security for the government also gives him a lead role in the regime's counterinsurgency strategy, which relies on the Janjaweed militias to destroy non-Arab villages in Darfur.

The deepening intelligence-sharing relationship between Washington and Khartoum blunted any U.S. response to the state-sponsored violence that exploded in Darfur in 2003 and 2004. U.S. officials have told my colleague Colin Thomas-Jensen and me that access to Gosh's information would be jeopardized if the Bush administration confronted Khartoum on Darfur. And since 2001, the administration had been pursuing a peace deal between southern Sudanese rebels and the regime in Khartoum -- a deal aimed at placating U.S. Christian groups that had long demanded action on behalf of Christian minorities in southern Sudan. The administration didn't want to undermine that process by hammering Khartoum over Darfur.

The people of Darfur never had a chance.

The term "genocide" became a point of contention in the 2004 presidential campaign, with Democratic candidate John F. Kerry and a united Congress calling on Bush to use it. Finally, on Sept. 9, 2004, then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell testified to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that "genocide has been committed in Darfur and that the government of Sudan and the Janjaweed bear responsibility -- and genocide may still be occurring."

Powell continued: "[N]o new action is dictated by this determination. We have been doing everything we can to get the Sudanese government to act responsibly."

Everything? The U.N. convention on genocide -- which the United States signed in 1948 and ratified 40 years later -- requires signatories to seek to prevent and punish the crime of genocide. But instead of being tried for war crimes, Gosh was flown to Langley last year to be debriefed by CIA officials. As a U.S. official told the Los Angeles Times, "The agency's view was that the Sudanese are helping us on terrorism and it was proud to bring him over. They didn't care about the political implications."

In the eyes of many intelligence officials, Gosh and other Sudanese informants have become more valuable for U.S. counterterrorism objectives over the past six months because of the unfolding political upheaval in Somalia. The CIA has long pursued al-Qaeda affiliates implicated in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa. To this end, Washington began secretly funding warlords in Somalia to pursue terrorism suspects. But this strategy backfired: Somali Islamists have taken control of much of southern Somalia, with hard-liners protecting al-Qaeda affiliates. Many leading Somali Islamists have ties to Gosh, a fact Khartoum exploits to strengthen counterterrorism links with Washington.

U.S. inaction on Darfur has continued in the face of the most energetic campaign by U.S. citizens on an African issue since the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa. But so far, mobilization by Christian, Jewish, African American and student groups has failed to move the administration's policy.

Indeed, Washington's constructive engagement with the Sudanese regime is as ineffective and morally bankrupt as the Reagan administration's approach to the apartheid regime in South Africa. During Bush's first term, the State Department wanted increased dialogue with Iraq, Iran and North Korea, but lost out to the Pentagon and Vice President Cheney. As consolation, the department took the lead on Sudan, shifting from the Clinton administration policy of isolation and pressure to one of engagement.

That policy has endured as Darfur continues to burn. Along with Powell, former deputy secretary Robert B. Zoellick and Jendayi Frazer, assistant secretary of state for African affairs, remained staunch advocates for engaging with Khartoum. In August, Frazer told reporters: "We believe that President Bashir and the Sudanese government want peace in Darfur." U.S. government sources have said that administration officials recently offered to lift some unilateral trade and investment sanctions imposed during the Clinton administration and move toward normalizing relations in exchange for Sudan's acceptance of U.N. peacekeepers. Khartoum refused.

Now, as the mayhem in Darfur escalates, Bush may have run out of patience. Administration officials say he regularly complains to national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley that more must be done. But to address both the administration's counterterrorism and human rights goals will require overcoming policy inertia and ignorance about the nature of the Khartoum regime -- two requirements perhaps beyond the reach of Bush's current team.

Consider prior efforts to influence the regime in Sudan. In 1995, Sudanese officials were implicated in the attempted assassination of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. Responding to the regime's failure to extradite terrorism suspects, the U.N. Security Council imposed travel restrictions on Sudanese officials and sanctions against Sudan Airways. Feeling pressured, the regime dismantled terrorist training camps and revoked passports given to known terrorists. And when the regime faced the prospect of a united armed rebellion in 2005, it signed a deal with southern-based rebels.

Clearly, diplomatic, economic and military pressure can have an impact -- both in pursuit of an end to the Darfur crisis and in the ability to access important counterterrorism information.

Last week, U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan, the United States and other governments moved closer to a deal with Khartoum allowing for a stronger peacekeeping force in Darfur. However, the regime retains control of the timing of new deployments. The likely result is that a few hundred more observers will arrive in the next six months. More peacekeepers will help only if there is a new peace deal and the Janjaweed militias begin to be dismantled.

The problem remains leverage. Possible pressure points include the threat of sanctions on Sudanese companies owned by ruling party officials doing business abroad; capital-market sanctions on foreign firms dealing with the regime; NATO planning to deploy forces to Darfur; and sharing information with the International Criminal Court to accelerate indictments of Khartoum officials for crimes against humanity.

Khartoum has taken the measure of the United States; it understands that from time to time the president may use the word "genocide" and that the State Department may issue a strongly worded statement to mollify religious activists. But walking loudly and carrying a toothpick only emboldens the regime to escalate its attacks in Darfur.

President Clinton often says that the biggest regret he has about his presidency was not responding effectively to the Rwandan genocide. If Bush does not change course, he may someday echo Clinton, lamenting that hundreds of thousands of Darfurian lives were needlessly extinguished -- on his watch.

jprendergast@crisisgroup.org


John Prendergast, senior adviser at the International Crisis Group, was director
of African affairs at the National Security Council during the Clinton administration.




http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/17/AR2006111701480.html
 
<center>
<font size=4 color=blue>!!The arabs help facilitate the slave trade .. Fuck them as well!!!</font></center>
<center><font size=4 color=blue>!!To know my pain .. Is 2 know my past!!</font></center>
<center>
<font size=4 color=blue>!! .... When I become a legislator .... !!
</font>
<font size=4 color=blue>!! .... Caveat Emptor .... !!
</font>
<img src="http://www.siu.edu/~bas/Images/bpfist.gif">
!There is nothing new under the sun!
Biblically! The so-called American Blacks are descendants of Abraham, namely Jacob (Israel) and his twelve sons and their wives, 70 in all, migrated from Canaan to Egypt around the year 1827 B.C. During their sojourn in Egypt the Children of Israel multiplied from being a family of 70 souls to a nation of over 3 million people at the time of the Exodus which took place in 1612 B.C.
This truth is grossly neglected, suppressed, and distorted in most European and American historical texts which are flavored with race prejudice. Fortunately, however, there are enough well authored and highly researched works by Black historians that challenge the Eurocentric revisions of history and correct the various erroneous views regarding the ethnic identity of the Hebrews.

</center>
 
Back
Top