Conservatives call Crowley biased

ballscout1

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
So they didn't like Candy or Martha and they were in the bag because Biden and then Obama exposed their candidates



As the right sees it, Candy Crowley is in the tank for Obama

Moderator Candy Crowley talks to the audience before the second presidential debate at Hofstra University, Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2012, in Hempstead, N.Y. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

Candy Crowley was biased for Barack Obama, conservatives pundits say.

During the debate last night, Crowley called out Romney for his claim that President Obama didn’t call the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi a terrorist attack for two weeks. In fact, Obama referred to it an “act of terror” while campaigning in Colorado, two days after the attack took place.

John Sununu said after the debate: ”The governor got blindsided a little bit by a moderator who incorrectly tried to affirm what the president said.”

Fox News had the headline: “CNN’s Crowley first plays umpire, then joins Team Obama.”

Rush Limbaugh said she “committed an act of journalistic terror or malpractice last night.”

And Twitter reacted as well:





Laura Ingraham✔
@IngrahamAngle

Romney fought hard ag President of the U.S. and Candy Crowley...and had to deal with "undecideds" who were obviously disgruntled liberals.

16 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite





Mike Schrimpf@mike_schrimpf


And candy tries to save Obama

16 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite





Sean Spicer✔
@seanspicer

Candy Crowley was WRONG -- POTUS did talk about terror in rose garden -- did not call it an act of terrorism #debates

16 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite





Michelle Malkin✔
@michellemalkin

Romney hammering Obama on pipeline again. Candy Crowley tries to throw O a lifeline. #townhalldebate

16 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite






Glenn Beck✔
@glennbeck

I am sorry, the Libya question was not a win for the president. R- was right as O did not call it a act of terror. He said word terror.

16 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite

Conservative bloggers also had their say. Matthew Sheffield of Newsbusters wrote: “Candy Crowley is making a fool of herself, repeatedly intervening to save a floundering President Obama and showing why many Americans were rightfully suspicious of her ability to moderate a presidential debate fairly.”

And Thomas Lifson wrote on American Thinker: “Later fact checkers can clarify the dispute between the two men over Obama’s contention that his Rose Garden address on 9/12 called the Benghazi attack a terror attack. But moderator Candy Crowley entered the dispute, essentially calling Obama correct, the clearest indication of her bias.”

Then there were those who, before and after the debate, went a different route, and attacked Crowley on her weight:





Kurt Schlichter@KurtSchlichter


I liked Candy Crowley better when she was in Wilson Phillips. #caring #debates

16 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite





Roger B @RogerBiles


Candy Crowley claims to be a vegetarian! What in the hell is she eating, Red Wood Trees?

17 Oct 12 Reply
Retweet
Favorite
 
Why pay them attention? There talking points are logical and worth discussing. Their narrative for the entire morning was dedicated to arguing about the "vagueness" of the Rose Garden speech.

How was that speech "vague" :confused:

Romney was attempting to lie, and she checked him, but gave him credit that yes, it took 2/3 weeks to get answers.

I guess the conservative fucktards like you missed that part :rolleyes:
 
Wow!

And IF they actually listened to her she said right after that while Obama did indeed say an act of terror, Romney was also correct in that Obama DID NOT label it as a terrorist attack as we know now, the point was really over semantics, she wanted to move on to Bengazi, but the fault was Romney's, he said the President DID NOT use the word "terror" when, in fact, he did!

Another point is Romney saying 23 million Americans are either underemployed or looking for work, which is true however, the last time he said it (and how he said it during the first debate) was that 23 million Americans were out of work, the majority of that number are employed part time and are still looking/want full time work, it's also a number that has been high for decades!
 
I guess the conservative fucktards like you missed that part :rolleyes:

Conservative? Listen you morbid imbecile. I have, and never will be a conservative. If you're too dense with a denser sense of reasoning that is relative to zygote and are dragging around bruised feelings from threads earlier where you clearly need to be spo-ken-to-in-a-slow-and-deliberate-manner that's not my issue.
 
When repugs make every excuse on everybody but their candidate you know they lost :lol:
 
if u cry enough to the media then you tend to get your way. u see how many networks started to carry more right leaning 'polls' to show either romney ahead or closing the national gap AFTER the conservatives started to complain when ALL the most reliable and used polls showed the president with a big lead
 
if u cry enough to the media then you tend to get your way. u see how many networks started to carry more right leaning 'polls' to show either romney ahead or closing the national gap AFTER the conservatives started to complain when ALL the most reliable and used polls showed the president with a big lead

No different than a coach calling out a player BEFORE a game to influence refs!

(yeah, Kevin Gilbride did that ish on purpose to the Niners Justin Smith, the cameras showed him holding too!)
 
Conservative? Listen you morbid imbecile. I have, and never will be a conservative. If you're too dense with a denser sense of reasoning that is relative to zygote and are dragging around bruised feelings from threads earlier where you clearly need to be spo-ken-to-in-a-slow-and-deliberate-manner that's not my issue.

Like they say "A hit dog will holler" :rolleyes:

Again fucktard, in your opinion as you have stated in earlier threads, Obama did not even state the words "Act of terror"

Let's face it, the woman did her job. Why are they mad :confused:

They want to pick and choose what fits their narrative. It does not work that way :hmm:

And you my friend are the imbecile quite evident based on your posts on this board.

Now run along little boy. :rolleyes:
 
400_F_8244021_RYB85aQfuSzo5Rpz39dYcj4KsSHemEK4.jpg

*awaiting GOP after last nights debates*
 
Back
Top