Coal Fired Power Plants Could be the Cause of Your Death, and You Wouldn't Even Know it

arnoldwsimmons

Rising Star
Platinum Member

US coal power plants killed at least 460,000 people in past 20 years – report​

Pollution caused twice as many premature deaths as previously thought, with updated understanding of dangers of PM2.5

Nina Lakhani climate justice reporter
@ninalakhani
Thu 23 Nov 2023 14.00 ESTLast modified on Fri 24 Nov 2023 12.09 EST
3000.jpg


Coal-fired power plants killed at least 460,000 Americans during the past two decades, causing twice as many premature deaths as previously thought, new research has found.

Cars, factories, fire smoke and electricity plants emit tiny toxic air pollutants known as fine particulate matter or PM2.5, which elevate the risk of an array of life-shortening medical conditions including asthma, heart disease, low birth weight and some cancers.

Researchers analyzed Medicare and emissions data from 1999 and 2020, and for the first time found that coal PM2.5 is twice as deadly as fine particle pollutants from other sources. Previous studies quantifying the death toll from air pollution assumed all PM2.5 sources posed the same risk, and therefore probably underestimated the dangers of coal plants.
Coal being loaded into a truck at an open-cast mine near Dhanbad, India
https://www.theguardian.com/environ...huge-expansion-of-fossil-fuels-says-un-report
Government regulations save lives, according to the research, which is published in Science, as most deaths happened when environmental standards were weakest and PM2.5 levels from coal-fired power stations highest.

“Air pollution from coal is much more harmful than we thought, and we’ve been treating it like it’s just another air pollutant,” said the lead author, Lucas Henneman, an assistant professor in the Sid and Reva Dewberry department of civil, environmental and infrastructure engineering at George Mason University. “This type of evidence is important to policymakers like EPA [the US Environmental Protection Agency] as they identify cost-effective solutions for cleaning up the country’s air, like requiring emissions controls or encouraging renewables.”

Henneman led a group of researchers who used publicly available data to track air pollution – and its health effects – from the 480 US coal power plants that operated at some point between 1999 and 2020. A model was used to track the wind direction and reach of the toxins from each power station. Annual exposure levels were then connected with more than 650m Medicare health records that covered most people over age 65 in the US.

The coal plants associated with most deaths were located east of the Mississippi River in industrialized states like Ohio and Pennsylvania, where power stations were historically constructed close to population hubs. But every region had at least one plant linked to 600 deaths, while 10 were associated with more than 5,000 deaths across the study period.

About 85% of the total 460,000 coal plant-related deaths occurred between 1999 and 2007, an average of more than 43,000 deaths per year. The death toll declined drastically as plants closed or scrubbers – a type of sulphur filter – were installed to comply with new environmental rules. By 2020, the coal PM2.5 death toll had dropped 95%, to 1,600 people.

“By linking records of where Medicare beneficiaries lived and when they died, we found that risks due to PM2.5 from coal were more than double the risks related to PM2.5 from all sources,” said co-author Francesca Dominici, a professor of biostatistics, population and data science at the Harvard TC Chan school of public health.

Coal use has declined in the US, but there are still more than 200 coal-fired power plants, accounting for 20% of electricity generation in 2022, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Indiana, Kentucky and Texas have the most operational coal plants, followed by Illinois, Missouri and Pennsylvania.

Globally, coal-generated power is still rising, with South Africa, China, India and Poland among the countries most dependent on the dirtiest of fossil fuels.

“As countries debate their energy sources – and as coal maintains a powerful, almost mythical status in American energy lore – our findings are highly valuable to policymakers and regulators as they weigh the need for cheap energy with the significant environmental and health costs,” said Dominici.
 
China is building coal plants like they won't need a planet in a century it's crazy... They have rare mineral game locked up the coal seems like their plan b. And I'm in solar there's a footprint we don't acknowledge there too. I have a wh full of outdated solar panels
 
Can't dispose of the nuclear waste, so how do we address that. Didn't Japan recently dump a bunch in the ocean?
It can be disposed of...it will have to be buried...

Japan had a tsunami and waste got washed out of that plant if I'm not mistaken...

It can be done.and it will.have to eventually. Coal is NOT sustainable. Nuclear is.
 
It can be disposed of...it will have to be buried...

Japan had a tsunami and waste got washed out of that plant if I'm not mistaken...

It can be done.and it will.have to eventually. Coal is NOT sustainable. Nuclear is.
So how do you bury nuclear waste in away it good for the environment? Are we going to leave it for future generations to suffer? Coal is definitely not sustainable but there truly isn't a way to deal with nuclear waste either.
 
So how do you bury nuclear waste in away it good for the environment? Are we going to leave it for future generations to suffer? Coal is definitely not sustainable but there truly isn't a way to deal with nuclear waste either.

...everything comes with a cost...there are protective measures that can be taken to dispose of nuclear waste...it isnt simply buried like conventional waste....
 
The same way they reporting this shit too late.

Is the exact same thing they are going to do when they admit..

Geoengineering aka stratospheric aerosol injections

Are going to be noted for killing more people....

And these bitch ass muthafuckas going confirm it

Decades too late..
 
So the coal isn't clean?
That depends. Coal is probably the worse fossil fuel you could use to produce electricty. Given, it is a good and cheap energy source, but the downside is, what happens after it's burned. In the early days before the EPA, there were no regulations. That's why in pictures, you could see black unfiltered smoke coming out of stacks. Under the clean air regulations, most fossil fuel plants either have to have scrubbers or precipitators, which can remove up to abouit 90% of particles. Yes, it's the last 10% that's doing the damage.
 
Last edited:
Ever seen a coal train?


Just watch the first minute and twenty five seconds. One would think that would last a coal power plant a minute... that's ONE DAY worth of coal for a power plant. I watch these trains come past the crib everyday headed down to Savannah. For context, each one of those cars carries 100 tons of coal. That's a crazy amount of shit burned into the atmosphere and no one really thinks about it. Luckily the plant in the area converted to natural gas and I'm guessing the coal plant near Savannah will be gone once Georgia Power opens up the nuclear power plant. And that train in the video is small compared to the ones that come past here. Those joints are so long that there are 3 engines in the front, another 2-3 in the middle pushin and another 2-3 at the back pushin. Some of them are literally a mile long. You'll see em go down fully loaded and back the next day empty heading to get reloaded. They are so long they can't even put them in the sidings.
 
Back
Top