CIA Director Resigns Suddenly - Speculation Why
- Thread starter QueEx
- Start date
The above story is boilerplate bullshit.
Not your fault QueEx, you just printed what CNN put out.
<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="10"></hr>
<font face="georgia" size="3" color="000000">
Goss is gone because his friend , Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, who Goss hired to be the Number #3 man at the CIA, in charge of contracting and procurement, was being bribed by a man named Brent Wilkes . Brent Wilkes is tied to indicted & now jailed former RepubliKlan congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham.
Being in charge of contracting and procurement at the CIA which has a ‘known’ yearly budget of over $60. billion, with little or no scrutiny or accountability puts you in a enviable position of power. You can give out multi-million dollar contracts to any fucking body you want. Foggo was being “buttered-up” and bribed by Brent Wilkes, with weekly “lock-down” parties at some of Washington’s best hotels. Wilkes supplied $5000. a night whores, gambling, liquor, drugs, & other assorted party favors.
Goss admitted to baby bush & Negroponte that he attended a few of Wilkes’ “lock down” parties, but he claims he didn’t gamble or get laid. The FBI was watching all of these “lock down” parties because they were conducting surveillance on Wilkes. The FBI told Negroponte about Goss & Foggo being at Wilkes’ “lock-down” parties. These facts will start dribbling out of the so called main-stream media over the next 2 weeks, despite RepubliKlan efforts to squash it.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/05/breaking-cia-director-porter-goss-resigns/
http://www.harpers.org/sb-red-lights-on-capitol-hill.html
http://online.wsj.com/public/articl...xnAIiEcHEI_20060527.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top
</font>
Not your fault QueEx, you just printed what CNN put out.
<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="10"></hr>
<font face="georgia" size="3" color="000000">
Goss is gone because his friend , Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, who Goss hired to be the Number #3 man at the CIA, in charge of contracting and procurement, was being bribed by a man named Brent Wilkes . Brent Wilkes is tied to indicted & now jailed former RepubliKlan congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham.
Being in charge of contracting and procurement at the CIA which has a ‘known’ yearly budget of over $60. billion, with little or no scrutiny or accountability puts you in a enviable position of power. You can give out multi-million dollar contracts to any fucking body you want. Foggo was being “buttered-up” and bribed by Brent Wilkes, with weekly “lock-down” parties at some of Washington’s best hotels. Wilkes supplied $5000. a night whores, gambling, liquor, drugs, & other assorted party favors.
Goss admitted to baby bush & Negroponte that he attended a few of Wilkes’ “lock down” parties, but he claims he didn’t gamble or get laid. The FBI was watching all of these “lock down” parties because they were conducting surveillance on Wilkes. The FBI told Negroponte about Goss & Foggo being at Wilkes’ “lock-down” parties. These facts will start dribbling out of the so called main-stream media over the next 2 weeks, despite RepubliKlan efforts to squash it.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/05/breaking-cia-director-porter-goss-resigns/
http://www.harpers.org/sb-red-lights-on-capitol-hill.html
http://online.wsj.com/public/articl...xnAIiEcHEI_20060527.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top
</font>
Last edited:
House Intel Panel Chief Opposes Hayden
House Intel Panel Chief Opposes Hayden
By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer
5 minutes ago
A leading Republican came out against the front-runner for CIA director, Gen. Michael Hayden, saying Sunday the spy agency should not have military leadership during a turbulent time among intelligence agencies.
Members of the Senate committee that would consider President Bush's nominee also expressed reservations, saying the CIA is a civilian agency and putting Hayden atop it would concentrate too much power in the military for intelligence matters.
Bush was expected to nominate a new director as early as Monday to replace Porter Goss, who abruptly resigned on Friday.
But opposition to Hayden because of his military background is mounting on Capitol Hill, where he would face tough hearings in the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Despite a distinguished career at the Defense Department, Hayden would be "the wrong person, the wrong place at the wrong time," said the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Peter Hoekstra (news, bio, voting record), R-Mich.
"There is ongoing tensions between this premier civilian intelligence agency and DOD as we speak," Hoekstra said. "And I think putting a general in charge — regardless of how good Mike is — ... is going to send the wrong signal through the agency here in Washington but also to our agents in the field around the world," he told "Fox News Sunday."
If Hayden were to get the nomination, military officers would run the major spy agencies in the United States, from the ultra-secret National Security Agency to the Defense Intelligence Agency.
The Pentagon already controls more than 80 percent of the intelligence budget.
"You can't have the military control most of the major aspects of intelligence," said Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein (news, bio, voting record) of California, who is on the Senate Intelligence Committee. The CIA "is a civilian agency and is meant to be a civilian agency," she said on ABC's "This Week."
A second committee member, GOP Sen. Saxby Chambliss (news, bio, voting record) of Georgia, added, "I think the fact that he is a part of the military today would be the major problem."
Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., mentioned fears the CIA would "just be gobbled up by the Defense Department" if Hayden were to take over.
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said he would view a Hayden nomination as a way to get information from the Bush administration about its secretive domestic surveillance program, undertaken by the NSA when Hayden led that agency.
The warrantless monitoring covered electronic communications between people in the United States and other parties overseas with suspected terrorist links.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060507...NhI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
House Intel Panel Chief Opposes Hayden
By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer
5 minutes ago
A leading Republican came out against the front-runner for CIA director, Gen. Michael Hayden, saying Sunday the spy agency should not have military leadership during a turbulent time among intelligence agencies.
Members of the Senate committee that would consider President Bush's nominee also expressed reservations, saying the CIA is a civilian agency and putting Hayden atop it would concentrate too much power in the military for intelligence matters.
Bush was expected to nominate a new director as early as Monday to replace Porter Goss, who abruptly resigned on Friday.
But opposition to Hayden because of his military background is mounting on Capitol Hill, where he would face tough hearings in the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Despite a distinguished career at the Defense Department, Hayden would be "the wrong person, the wrong place at the wrong time," said the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Peter Hoekstra (news, bio, voting record), R-Mich.
"There is ongoing tensions between this premier civilian intelligence agency and DOD as we speak," Hoekstra said. "And I think putting a general in charge — regardless of how good Mike is — ... is going to send the wrong signal through the agency here in Washington but also to our agents in the field around the world," he told "Fox News Sunday."
If Hayden were to get the nomination, military officers would run the major spy agencies in the United States, from the ultra-secret National Security Agency to the Defense Intelligence Agency.
The Pentagon already controls more than 80 percent of the intelligence budget.
"You can't have the military control most of the major aspects of intelligence," said Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein (news, bio, voting record) of California, who is on the Senate Intelligence Committee. The CIA "is a civilian agency and is meant to be a civilian agency," she said on ABC's "This Week."
A second committee member, GOP Sen. Saxby Chambliss (news, bio, voting record) of Georgia, added, "I think the fact that he is a part of the military today would be the major problem."
Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., mentioned fears the CIA would "just be gobbled up by the Defense Department" if Hayden were to take over.
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said he would view a Hayden nomination as a way to get information from the Bush administration about its secretive domestic surveillance program, undertaken by the NSA when Hayden led that agency.
The warrantless monitoring covered electronic communications between people in the United States and other parties overseas with suspected terrorist links.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060507...NhI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
i'm sure its the same reliable inside source that revealed bush spying on the kerry campaign with the NSA wiretap program.muckraker10021 said:
the head of the cia, whose job is to catch foreign leaders in drug and prostitute parties decides to go to a few WHILE he's the cia director.
either he's an idiot or you once again jumped to the most extreme conclusion 5 minutes after a story breaks.
so you've heard reports how goss attended those same parties? and by the way reporting on a rumor doesnt make it any more than just a rumor dolemite.
i'm going to take a guess that when this isnt reported like muckmaker says it will just be a conspiracy cover-up by the not liberal media.
i'm going to take a guess that when this isnt reported like muckmaker says it will just be a conspiracy cover-up by the not liberal media.
Never said it was fact. Fact is he made the CIA weaker and he was a shitty appointment by an even shittier president.Greed said:
[frame]http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/06/05/ana06029.html[/frame]
[frame]http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20060505/cm_huffpost/020441[/frame]
<font face="arial unicode ms, microsoft sans serif, verdana" size="3" color="#333333">
If the quote above is representative of you “straight talking” without any hyperbole, or an attempt at witticism, and you truly believe ‘your own’ description of the CIA directors job, then your dramatic paucity of knowledge transcends absurdity and takes us into the realm of the phantasmagorical.
A homogeneous character deficiency among the 32% of the polled Americans who still unequivocally support their “Dear Leader”-baby bush is an aversion to fact based reality.
The 32% faithful still believe in the “Dear Leader’s” lies. After all “He is a Man of God”.
Those of us in the “reality based” world have been able to see that “The Emperor Has No Clothes” from before day one of his Supreme Court installed presidency. Before 9/11 occurred in 2001, the “Dear Leader” poll numbers were already down to 41% approval.
For those of us in the “reality based” world, who can forget Porter Goss in the film Fahrenheit 911, explicitly telling us why he was wholly unqualified to be even considered to head the CIA.
Goss was ramrodded into the job as CIA chief by bush’s Über consigliere, Dick Cheney.
Goss’s job was to discipline, muzzle or remove anyone at the CIA who was actually trying to do their job, which is to provide objective, fact-based, non-partisan intelligence to the White House and other government agencies.
Read James Bamford’s
<font color="#0000ff">A Pretext for War : 9/11, Iraq, and the Abuse of America's Intelligence Agencies</font>.
The brief synopsis that I provided on this latest chapter of RepubliKlan corruption has been validated in <b>hundreds</b> of press accounts and today is only Sunday May 7th 8:04 Eastern Time. The quote below is from the ‘Times Of London’.
“The net is also closing in on Foggo, who is being investigated by the FBI over the award to Wilkes of a $3million contract to supply bottled water and other goods to the CIA”
<font color="#d90000" size="4">CIA chief quits after 'HOOKERGATE'</font>
By the way - the ‘Times Of London’ is owned by that left-wing, Communist, Socialist, “Hate-America-First” , liberal activist, “Michael Moore Loving” , gay loving, ****** loving, tree-hugger,……………….RUPERT MURDOCH.
<img src="http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1100000/images/_1102560_murdoch300.jpg" width="170" height="102">
Yes, RUPERT MURDOCH the same guy who owns <s>FOX </s> FAKE News the Orwellian propaganda channel for the 32% who still follow the “Dear Leader”.
I’m not going to do your homework for you. Reality awaits you if you are willing to let it in.<img src="http://64.255.174.200/board/images/smilies/confused.gif"><img src="http://64.255.174.200/board/images/smilies/confused.gif"><img src="http://64.255.174.200/board/images/smilies/confused.gif"><img src="http://64.255.174.200/board/images/smilies/confused.gif"><img src="http://64.255.174.200/board/images/smilies/confused.gif">
<font color="#d90000" size="4">Names Like "Nine Fingers" and Dusty Foggo Make Even Gov't Contracting Interesting</font>
</font>
<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="14"></hr>
Last edited:
i like the way i hear all the buzz words on the sunday morning news shows then here you are sunday night hitting every last one of them.
muckraker what are you going to do when this story has as much legs as your "bush used the NSA to spy on the kerry campaign" agenda.
you keep repeating everything the Nation says and have no shame whether you're or wrong. and you're mostly wrong.
do you people really care about winning an election or not.
and if i remember that movie correctly goss said he couldnt compete with the current generation of operators because of their newer language requirements. what does that has to do with being a manager and dictating priorities regarding the direction the agency should go, which is really the president's agenda anyway? let me guess everything.
you know kerry couldnt pass the physical fitness test for a soldier now yet he had the nerve to run for commander and chief. how dare he.
see how stupid that sounds and why you dirty libs sound so disingenuous and will forever hurt the country with your emotional arguments? of course you dont.
muckraker what are you going to do when this story has as much legs as your "bush used the NSA to spy on the kerry campaign" agenda.
you keep repeating everything the Nation says and have no shame whether you're or wrong. and you're mostly wrong.
do you people really care about winning an election or not.
and if i remember that movie correctly goss said he couldnt compete with the current generation of operators because of their newer language requirements. what does that has to do with being a manager and dictating priorities regarding the direction the agency should go, which is really the president's agenda anyway? let me guess everything.
you know kerry couldnt pass the physical fitness test for a soldier now yet he had the nerve to run for commander and chief. how dare he.
see how stupid that sounds and why you dirty libs sound so disingenuous and will forever hurt the country with your emotional arguments? of course you dont.
Bush Turns to Gen. Hayden to Lead CIA
Bush Turns to Gen. Hayden to Lead CIA
By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent
2 minutes ago
President Bush on Monday chose Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden to lead the embattled Central Intelligence Agency, re-igniting a debate over the domestic surveillance program that the onetime head of the National Security Agency once ran.
Republican and Democratic critics also questioned the wisdom of putting a military officer in charge of the civilian spy agency.
"Mike Hayden is supremely qualified for this position," Bush said in the Oval Office, with Hayden at his side. Without mentioning Hayden's critics or their objections, the president said: "He knows the intelligence community from the ground up."
If confirmed, Hayden would replace Porter Goss, who resigned under pressure Friday.
He said that Hayden "has been a provider and consumer of intelligence."
To balance the CIA between military and civilian leadership, the White House plans to move aside the agency's No. 2 official, Vice Admiral Albert Calland III, who took over as deputy director less than a year ago, two senior administration officials said. Other personnel changes also are likely, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the changes are not ready to announce.
Talk of Hayden's nomination rekindled debate over the administration's domestic surveillance program, which Hayden used to oversee as the former head of the National Security Agency.
"There's probably no post more important in preserving our security and our values as people than the CIA," Hayden said.
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairwoman Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she has found Hayden to be "straightforward and willing to share his candid professional judgments — even when they differed" from those of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.
"Nevertheless, to send a signal of independence from the Pentagon, General Hayden may want to consider retiring from the Air Force," she said. "That would put to rest questions about whether an active duty military officer should lead the CIA at this time."
Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., had said in advance of the announcement that he would use Hayden's nomination to raise questions about the legality of the domestic surveillance program and did not rule out holding it up until he gets answers. "I'm not going to draw any lines in the sand until I see how the facts evolve," Specter said on Fox.
Rep. Peter Hoekstra (news, bio, voting record), R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said he was concerned that Hayden's nomination would detract from the real issue of intelligence reform.
"The debate in the Senate may end up being about the terrorist surveillance program and not about the future of the CIA or the intelligence community, which is exactly where the debate needs to be," Hoekstra said on CBS' "The Early Show."
"This is about whether we still have alignment and agreement between the executive branch and Congress as to where intelligence reform needs to go," he said.
Hoekstra's sentiment was echoed by Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss (news, bio, voting record) of Georgia, who said that Hayden's military background would be a "major problem," and several Democrats who made the rounds of the Sunday television talk shows. Sen. Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record), D-Del., said Hayden could leave agents with the impression that the CIA has been "just gobbled up by the Defense Department."
Bush noted that Hayden was unanimously approved by the Senate for his current job — the nation's No. 2 intelligence official.
Bracing for a tough nomination fight, the White House took the unusual step of pre-empting Bush's announcement with a defensive media blitz. "We think the issue is getting the best man for the job and the president has determined that Mike Hayden is the best man for the job," Hadley told The Associated Press. He also appeared on morning news shows before Bush formally announced his nomination of Hayden.
"He'll be reporting to the president of the United States, not Don Rumsfeld," the secretary of defense, Hadley said, adding that other military officers have led the CIA, Hadley said. "So the precedents are clear."
White House counselor Dan Bartlett said Hayden would be the fifth CIA chief in uniform. "He has been viewed as a non-comformist and an independent thinker," Bartlett said.
Hadley said that any nominee to lead the CIA would face questions about the controversial domestic surveillance program by the National Security Agency and that Hayden, the former director of the agency, was the best man to answer those questions.
If Hayden were confirmed, military officers would run all the major spy agencies, from the ultra-secret National Security Agency to the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Some lawmakers, like Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein (news, bio, voting record) of California, suggested that Hayden might think about resigning his military post if he were going to head the CIA. But Hoekstra and Chambliss were among those who said that wouldn't solve the problem.
"Just resigning commission and moving on, putting on a striped suit, a pinstriped suit versus an Air Force uniform, I don't think makes much difference," Chambliss said on ABC's "This Week."
Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz., defended Hayden.
"In all due respect to my colleagues — and I obviously respect their views — General Hayden is really more of an intelligence person than he is an Air Force officer," McCain said on "Face the Nation" on CBS. "I think that we should also remember that there had been other former military people who have been directors of the CIA."
John Lehman, head of the Sept. 11 investigative commission, told CNN: "Mike Hayden is one of the best military intelligence officers we've ever had."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_shake_up
Bush Turns to Gen. Hayden to Lead CIA
By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent
2 minutes ago
President Bush on Monday chose Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden to lead the embattled Central Intelligence Agency, re-igniting a debate over the domestic surveillance program that the onetime head of the National Security Agency once ran.
Republican and Democratic critics also questioned the wisdom of putting a military officer in charge of the civilian spy agency.
"Mike Hayden is supremely qualified for this position," Bush said in the Oval Office, with Hayden at his side. Without mentioning Hayden's critics or their objections, the president said: "He knows the intelligence community from the ground up."
If confirmed, Hayden would replace Porter Goss, who resigned under pressure Friday.
He said that Hayden "has been a provider and consumer of intelligence."
To balance the CIA between military and civilian leadership, the White House plans to move aside the agency's No. 2 official, Vice Admiral Albert Calland III, who took over as deputy director less than a year ago, two senior administration officials said. Other personnel changes also are likely, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because the changes are not ready to announce.
Talk of Hayden's nomination rekindled debate over the administration's domestic surveillance program, which Hayden used to oversee as the former head of the National Security Agency.
"There's probably no post more important in preserving our security and our values as people than the CIA," Hayden said.
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairwoman Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she has found Hayden to be "straightforward and willing to share his candid professional judgments — even when they differed" from those of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.
"Nevertheless, to send a signal of independence from the Pentagon, General Hayden may want to consider retiring from the Air Force," she said. "That would put to rest questions about whether an active duty military officer should lead the CIA at this time."
Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., had said in advance of the announcement that he would use Hayden's nomination to raise questions about the legality of the domestic surveillance program and did not rule out holding it up until he gets answers. "I'm not going to draw any lines in the sand until I see how the facts evolve," Specter said on Fox.
Rep. Peter Hoekstra (news, bio, voting record), R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said he was concerned that Hayden's nomination would detract from the real issue of intelligence reform.
"The debate in the Senate may end up being about the terrorist surveillance program and not about the future of the CIA or the intelligence community, which is exactly where the debate needs to be," Hoekstra said on CBS' "The Early Show."
"This is about whether we still have alignment and agreement between the executive branch and Congress as to where intelligence reform needs to go," he said.
Hoekstra's sentiment was echoed by Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss (news, bio, voting record) of Georgia, who said that Hayden's military background would be a "major problem," and several Democrats who made the rounds of the Sunday television talk shows. Sen. Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record), D-Del., said Hayden could leave agents with the impression that the CIA has been "just gobbled up by the Defense Department."
Bush noted that Hayden was unanimously approved by the Senate for his current job — the nation's No. 2 intelligence official.
Bracing for a tough nomination fight, the White House took the unusual step of pre-empting Bush's announcement with a defensive media blitz. "We think the issue is getting the best man for the job and the president has determined that Mike Hayden is the best man for the job," Hadley told The Associated Press. He also appeared on morning news shows before Bush formally announced his nomination of Hayden.
"He'll be reporting to the president of the United States, not Don Rumsfeld," the secretary of defense, Hadley said, adding that other military officers have led the CIA, Hadley said. "So the precedents are clear."
White House counselor Dan Bartlett said Hayden would be the fifth CIA chief in uniform. "He has been viewed as a non-comformist and an independent thinker," Bartlett said.
Hadley said that any nominee to lead the CIA would face questions about the controversial domestic surveillance program by the National Security Agency and that Hayden, the former director of the agency, was the best man to answer those questions.
If Hayden were confirmed, military officers would run all the major spy agencies, from the ultra-secret National Security Agency to the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Some lawmakers, like Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein (news, bio, voting record) of California, suggested that Hayden might think about resigning his military post if he were going to head the CIA. But Hoekstra and Chambliss were among those who said that wouldn't solve the problem.
"Just resigning commission and moving on, putting on a striped suit, a pinstriped suit versus an Air Force uniform, I don't think makes much difference," Chambliss said on ABC's "This Week."
Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record), R-Ariz., defended Hayden.
"In all due respect to my colleagues — and I obviously respect their views — General Hayden is really more of an intelligence person than he is an Air Force officer," McCain said on "Face the Nation" on CBS. "I think that we should also remember that there had been other former military people who have been directors of the CIA."
John Lehman, head of the Sept. 11 investigative commission, told CNN: "Mike Hayden is one of the best military intelligence officers we've ever had."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_go_pr_wh/white_house_shake_up
Re: Bush Turns to Gen. Hayden to Lead CIA
<font size="4"><center>Porter Goss's resignation as chief of the US
Central Intelligence Agency is rooted in President
George W Bush's aim to coordinate and streamline
America's numerous intelligence-gathering agencies.
But the real winner in this shakeup may be none other
than Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld</font size></center>
[frame]http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/HE09Aa01.html[/frame]
<font size="4"><center>Porter Goss's resignation as chief of the US
Central Intelligence Agency is rooted in President
George W Bush's aim to coordinate and streamline
America's numerous intelligence-gathering agencies.
But the real winner in this shakeup may be none other
than Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld</font size></center>
[frame]http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/HE09Aa01.html[/frame]
i like the way, a loaded pistol go pop!, dirty politicians on the verge of political suicide, i want to feel the shock, public image shattered, no mercy, just guilt, cry in front of cameras, shame you cant block, point it to your dome a loaded pistol you must cock...
<font size="5"><center>Ousted CIA No. 3 Is Target of Raids</font size>
<font size="4">Foggo's Home and Langley Office Swept in Corruption Probe</font size></center>
Washington Post
By Dafna Linzer and Charles R. Babcock
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, May 13, 2006; Page A01
Federal agents yesterday searched the CIA offices and Northern Virginia home of Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, the spy agency's No. 3 official who was forced to resign this week amid a widening criminal investigation into allegations of government corruption and bribery.
Officials inside CIA headquarters saw agents hauling away items from Foggo's seventh-floor suite, and neighbors outside his rented house in the Oakdale Park section of Vienna said officers, some wearing plastic gloves, placed materials in vans parked at the front and rear of the split-level brick home.
Aside from well-publicized espionage cases, veteran intelligence officers said they could not recall another time when FBI agents picked through offices at the CIA's Langley headquarters.
More than 30 agents from the FBI, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the Internal Revenue Service and the CIA inspector general's office took part in the raids, according to Debbie Weierman, a spokeswoman for the FBI's Washington Field Office. Weierman said she could not comment further because affidavits describing the scope of the search were sealed.
CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Millerwise Dyck said the agency's inspector general and the FBI are jointly investigating the allegations of misconduct by Foggo and have "executed search warrants for his agency workplace and residence." She said, "The agency is cooperating fully with the Department of Justice and the FBI."
Foggo, 51, was hired in 2004 by Porter J. Goss, the former Republican congressman who was pushed aside last week as CIA director. The choice of Foggo to be the agency's executive director, whose portfolio is similar to that of chief operating officer, was greeted with deep skepticism within the agency at a time when senior intelligence officers were resigning to protest what they perceived as Goss's weak management style and partisan staff choices.
During his tenure, Foggo tightened the agency's publication rules and launched several probes of leaks to the media.
Earlier this year, however, he was placed under investigation by the CIA inspector general and federal prosecutors after allegations that he helped a high school friend, Brent R. Wilkes, obtain CIA contracts and improperly accepted vacation trips from Wilkes. Foggo has denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged. His attorney, William G. Hundley, did not return calls yesterday.
Wilkes, a San Diego defense contractor, has been under investigation for allegedly bribing former congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif.), who pleaded guilty to corruption charges last November and is serving a prison sentence of more than eight years. Wilkes has not been charged, but he was identified as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Cunningham probe.
Foggo was in his office late Thursday, officials said, but by yesterday morning he was barred from entering the CIA campus.
In a staffwide e-mail Monday, Foggo announced that he intended to step down but did not mention the widening probe against him. He emphasized, however, that he had no plans for an immediate departure, telling colleagues that he looked forward to seeing as many of them as possible over the coming weeks, according to several people who received the e-mail.
Intelligence officials close to Goss said yesterday that Goss had asked Foggo to resign early last week, several days before the White House announced that it was replacing Goss.
"Porter asked him to step down because of his concerns that the allegations against Foggo had become a distraction for the employees and had the potential to damage the agency's reputation," an intelligence official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. The official said Goss had no knowledge that federal agents were preparing to issue search warrants at the time or even that his own resignation was only days away from being announced by President Bush.
Foggo spent 25 years in the CIA in several posts at headquarters and overseas, including Honduras; Vienna, Austria; and Frankfurt, Germany.
Federal investigators are trying to determine whether Foggo steered contracts to Wilkes while he served in Frankfurt in the years before being named the agency's executive director, sources have said. The FBI has already sent a team of investigators to Frankfurt. Hundley, Foggo's attorney, said earlier this week that his client "never knowingly" arranged for a CIA contract to be awarded to one of Wilkes's companies.
Hundley also said Foggo did not report family vacations with Wilkes as gifts because Foggo picked up his share of the expenses.
Foggo and Wilkes have been friends since high school in San Diego and attended poker parties in Washington, sometimes with members of Congress and other CIA officers, participants have said.
Nancy Luque, a Washington lawyer who represents Wilkes, said yesterday that she was "surprised" by the Foggo raids. "We feel confident, just as with [the search of] Mr. Wilkes' business, that no evidence of wrongdoing will be found," she said.
Last summer, as part of the Cunningham probe, federal agents searched Wilkes's home and office, as well as Cunningham's home and the office, home and boat of Mitchell J. Wade, a Washington defense contractor who has pleaded guilty to conspiring to bribe Cunningham.
Another Goss aide also had a relationship with Wilkes, according to financial disclosure statements. Brant G. Bassett, a former CIA officer who was a member of Goss's staff on the House intelligence committee, reported receiving a $5,000 "consulting fee" from a Wilkes company, ADCS Inc., in May 2000. Bassett has not commented on the fee.
Staff writer C. Woodrow Irvin and researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...6051200989.html?referrer=email&referrer=email
<font size="4">Foggo's Home and Langley Office Swept in Corruption Probe</font size></center>
Washington Post
By Dafna Linzer and Charles R. Babcock
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, May 13, 2006; Page A01
Federal agents yesterday searched the CIA offices and Northern Virginia home of Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, the spy agency's No. 3 official who was forced to resign this week amid a widening criminal investigation into allegations of government corruption and bribery.
Officials inside CIA headquarters saw agents hauling away items from Foggo's seventh-floor suite, and neighbors outside his rented house in the Oakdale Park section of Vienna said officers, some wearing plastic gloves, placed materials in vans parked at the front and rear of the split-level brick home.
Aside from well-publicized espionage cases, veteran intelligence officers said they could not recall another time when FBI agents picked through offices at the CIA's Langley headquarters.
More than 30 agents from the FBI, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, the Internal Revenue Service and the CIA inspector general's office took part in the raids, according to Debbie Weierman, a spokeswoman for the FBI's Washington Field Office. Weierman said she could not comment further because affidavits describing the scope of the search were sealed.
CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Millerwise Dyck said the agency's inspector general and the FBI are jointly investigating the allegations of misconduct by Foggo and have "executed search warrants for his agency workplace and residence." She said, "The agency is cooperating fully with the Department of Justice and the FBI."
Foggo, 51, was hired in 2004 by Porter J. Goss, the former Republican congressman who was pushed aside last week as CIA director. The choice of Foggo to be the agency's executive director, whose portfolio is similar to that of chief operating officer, was greeted with deep skepticism within the agency at a time when senior intelligence officers were resigning to protest what they perceived as Goss's weak management style and partisan staff choices.
During his tenure, Foggo tightened the agency's publication rules and launched several probes of leaks to the media.
Earlier this year, however, he was placed under investigation by the CIA inspector general and federal prosecutors after allegations that he helped a high school friend, Brent R. Wilkes, obtain CIA contracts and improperly accepted vacation trips from Wilkes. Foggo has denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged. His attorney, William G. Hundley, did not return calls yesterday.
Wilkes, a San Diego defense contractor, has been under investigation for allegedly bribing former congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif.), who pleaded guilty to corruption charges last November and is serving a prison sentence of more than eight years. Wilkes has not been charged, but he was identified as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Cunningham probe.
Foggo was in his office late Thursday, officials said, but by yesterday morning he was barred from entering the CIA campus.
In a staffwide e-mail Monday, Foggo announced that he intended to step down but did not mention the widening probe against him. He emphasized, however, that he had no plans for an immediate departure, telling colleagues that he looked forward to seeing as many of them as possible over the coming weeks, according to several people who received the e-mail.
Intelligence officials close to Goss said yesterday that Goss had asked Foggo to resign early last week, several days before the White House announced that it was replacing Goss.
"Porter asked him to step down because of his concerns that the allegations against Foggo had become a distraction for the employees and had the potential to damage the agency's reputation," an intelligence official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. The official said Goss had no knowledge that federal agents were preparing to issue search warrants at the time or even that his own resignation was only days away from being announced by President Bush.
Foggo spent 25 years in the CIA in several posts at headquarters and overseas, including Honduras; Vienna, Austria; and Frankfurt, Germany.
Federal investigators are trying to determine whether Foggo steered contracts to Wilkes while he served in Frankfurt in the years before being named the agency's executive director, sources have said. The FBI has already sent a team of investigators to Frankfurt. Hundley, Foggo's attorney, said earlier this week that his client "never knowingly" arranged for a CIA contract to be awarded to one of Wilkes's companies.
Hundley also said Foggo did not report family vacations with Wilkes as gifts because Foggo picked up his share of the expenses.
Foggo and Wilkes have been friends since high school in San Diego and attended poker parties in Washington, sometimes with members of Congress and other CIA officers, participants have said.
Nancy Luque, a Washington lawyer who represents Wilkes, said yesterday that she was "surprised" by the Foggo raids. "We feel confident, just as with [the search of] Mr. Wilkes' business, that no evidence of wrongdoing will be found," she said.
Last summer, as part of the Cunningham probe, federal agents searched Wilkes's home and office, as well as Cunningham's home and the office, home and boat of Mitchell J. Wade, a Washington defense contractor who has pleaded guilty to conspiring to bribe Cunningham.
Another Goss aide also had a relationship with Wilkes, according to financial disclosure statements. Brant G. Bassett, a former CIA officer who was a member of Goss's staff on the House intelligence committee, reported receiving a $5,000 "consulting fee" from a Wilkes company, ADCS Inc., in May 2000. Bassett has not commented on the fee.
Staff writer C. Woodrow Irvin and researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...6051200989.html?referrer=email&referrer=email
<img src="http://proquest.umi.com/i/pub/7818.gif">
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
Six Degrees of Bacon </font>
<font face="trebuchet ms, arial unicode ms, helvetica, verdana" size="3" color="#000000">
<b>
<img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/04/02/opinion/dowd-ts-75.jpg">
By Maureen Dowd
May 13th 2006</b>
- WASHINGTON D.C.-
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/05/13/opinion/13dowd.html?_r=1&oref=login
I bet you're wondering how someone like Dusty Foggo, who had his C.I.A. badge deactivated yesterday because of his role in a scandal ripe with poker parties, Dominican cigars, prostitutes, Scotch, luxury suites, bribed congressmen, defense contracts and even a rumored Teutonic dominatrix, was ever chosen to run day-to-day C.I.A. operations at such a parlous moment in American history.
It's because of Bacon Guy.
That would be Michael Kostiw, a conservative darling who was Porter Goss's first choice to be the third-ranking official at the C.I.A.
He was derailed in 2004 after fellow spooks leaked word to The Washington Post that Mr. Kostiw had left the agency under a hickory-smoked cloud two decades earlier, after being caught shoplifting a $2.13 package of bacon from a supermarket in Langley,Va., near C.I.A. headquarters.
Not the pork you usually associate with Washington.
Mr. Goss, W.'s absurd choice to lead our inept intelligence agency in the battle against Islamic terrorists, was so loony he wanted to put a man in charge of C.I.A. discipline who had to be disciplined for slipping chazerai into his pants, or wherever he put the package to bring home the bacon.
Mr. Goss's departure, after a season spent sulking about losing the president's ear to John Negroponte, has opened the window on a whole new level of incompetence, turf wars, corruption and wackiness.
Now we see that the C.I.A. was mired not only in professional mistakes, but also in a complete lack of personal and personneljudgment.
The more you know about the people Mr. Goss put in top positions, the scarier it gets.
When he was caught in 1981, Mr. Kostiw had been a C.I.A. case officer for a decade.
But his answers on a C.I.A. polygraph test and psych exam about the purloined bacon were so sketchy that he was placed on administrative leave and forced to get counseling, Walter Pincus wrote in The Post. Mr. Kostiw wound up resigning.
Like Brownie, Bacon Guy found his comeback path greased by cronyism.
He worked on Porter Goss's terrorism subcommittee when Mr. Goss led the House Intelligence Committee, after working as a lobbyist for ChevronTexaco
(All roads lead back to oil.)
After Bacon Guy was forced to withdraw, Mr. Goss and his chief of staff, Patrick Murray, were not moved to look for a sterling choice for the No. 3 post.
They were moved to go on a rampage to ferret out and get rid of the libs in the agency whom they suspected of leaking the news of Bacon Guy's carnivorous crime.
With a Nixonesque sense of paranoia and vendetta, the Bush dominatrixes never seem to worry about the nefarious activity itself-- from shoplifting to gathering data on all Americans' phone records.
They just resent it when the nefarious activity is revealed.
When word got out that the government was snooping on domestic calls,the administration rushed into action, not to investigate the violation of the Constitution but to punish any government employees who might have leaked it to The Times.
Despite rumors and complaints about Dusty, Porter Goss once more went for a bad choice, installing Dusty in the inner circle of Gosslings,as the C.I.A. director's cronies were known.
No doubt trying to save himself, Mr. Goss asked Dusty to step down once he became publicly ensnared in a bribery scandal that includes a wild cast of poker-playing characters, like Duke Cunningham and the retired C.I.A. official Brant Bassett, a k a "Nine Fingers."
He's said to have a prosthetic 10th finger to hide his identity during cloak-and-dagger operations.
Dusty's childhood friend Brent Wilkes, a defense contractor who has racked up almost $100 million in government contracts, is reported to have given Dusty's other pal, Nine Fingers, a $5,000 fee to go to Germany for a few days as a consultant on a business deal in 2000.
Investigators are looking into whether Mr. Foggo gave a contract to deliver bottled water to a C.I.A. office in Iraq to a relative of Mr. Wilkes, and whether Mr. Wilkes treated him to posh vacations in Hawaii and Florida.
In a scene that would impress even the "Law and Order" impresario Dick Wolf, investigators from the F.B.I., the I.R.S., the Defense Criminal Investigative Service and the C.I.A.'s inspector general showed up yesterday for the searches.
Dusty's C.I.A. office and his house in a nearby Virginia suburb were examined.
The dolts at F.B.I. headquarters could not get it together to search Zacarias Moussaoui's computer before 9/11, but now we have the F.B.I. searching the C.I.A.
That's not progress. </font>
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
Six Degrees of Bacon </font>
<font face="trebuchet ms, arial unicode ms, helvetica, verdana" size="3" color="#000000">
<b>
<img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/04/02/opinion/dowd-ts-75.jpg">
By Maureen Dowd
May 13th 2006</b>
- WASHINGTON D.C.-
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/05/13/opinion/13dowd.html?_r=1&oref=login
I bet you're wondering how someone like Dusty Foggo, who had his C.I.A. badge deactivated yesterday because of his role in a scandal ripe with poker parties, Dominican cigars, prostitutes, Scotch, luxury suites, bribed congressmen, defense contracts and even a rumored Teutonic dominatrix, was ever chosen to run day-to-day C.I.A. operations at such a parlous moment in American history.
It's because of Bacon Guy.
That would be Michael Kostiw, a conservative darling who was Porter Goss's first choice to be the third-ranking official at the C.I.A.
He was derailed in 2004 after fellow spooks leaked word to The Washington Post that Mr. Kostiw had left the agency under a hickory-smoked cloud two decades earlier, after being caught shoplifting a $2.13 package of bacon from a supermarket in Langley,Va., near C.I.A. headquarters.
Not the pork you usually associate with Washington.
Mr. Goss, W.'s absurd choice to lead our inept intelligence agency in the battle against Islamic terrorists, was so loony he wanted to put a man in charge of C.I.A. discipline who had to be disciplined for slipping chazerai into his pants, or wherever he put the package to bring home the bacon.
Mr. Goss's departure, after a season spent sulking about losing the president's ear to John Negroponte, has opened the window on a whole new level of incompetence, turf wars, corruption and wackiness.
Now we see that the C.I.A. was mired not only in professional mistakes, but also in a complete lack of personal and personneljudgment.
The more you know about the people Mr. Goss put in top positions, the scarier it gets.
When he was caught in 1981, Mr. Kostiw had been a C.I.A. case officer for a decade.
But his answers on a C.I.A. polygraph test and psych exam about the purloined bacon were so sketchy that he was placed on administrative leave and forced to get counseling, Walter Pincus wrote in The Post. Mr. Kostiw wound up resigning.
Like Brownie, Bacon Guy found his comeback path greased by cronyism.
He worked on Porter Goss's terrorism subcommittee when Mr. Goss led the House Intelligence Committee, after working as a lobbyist for ChevronTexaco
(All roads lead back to oil.)
After Bacon Guy was forced to withdraw, Mr. Goss and his chief of staff, Patrick Murray, were not moved to look for a sterling choice for the No. 3 post.
They were moved to go on a rampage to ferret out and get rid of the libs in the agency whom they suspected of leaking the news of Bacon Guy's carnivorous crime.
With a Nixonesque sense of paranoia and vendetta, the Bush dominatrixes never seem to worry about the nefarious activity itself-- from shoplifting to gathering data on all Americans' phone records.
They just resent it when the nefarious activity is revealed.
When word got out that the government was snooping on domestic calls,the administration rushed into action, not to investigate the violation of the Constitution but to punish any government employees who might have leaked it to The Times.
Despite rumors and complaints about Dusty, Porter Goss once more went for a bad choice, installing Dusty in the inner circle of Gosslings,as the C.I.A. director's cronies were known.
No doubt trying to save himself, Mr. Goss asked Dusty to step down once he became publicly ensnared in a bribery scandal that includes a wild cast of poker-playing characters, like Duke Cunningham and the retired C.I.A. official Brant Bassett, a k a "Nine Fingers."
He's said to have a prosthetic 10th finger to hide his identity during cloak-and-dagger operations.
Dusty's childhood friend Brent Wilkes, a defense contractor who has racked up almost $100 million in government contracts, is reported to have given Dusty's other pal, Nine Fingers, a $5,000 fee to go to Germany for a few days as a consultant on a business deal in 2000.
Investigators are looking into whether Mr. Foggo gave a contract to deliver bottled water to a C.I.A. office in Iraq to a relative of Mr. Wilkes, and whether Mr. Wilkes treated him to posh vacations in Hawaii and Florida.
In a scene that would impress even the "Law and Order" impresario Dick Wolf, investigators from the F.B.I., the I.R.S., the Defense Criminal Investigative Service and the C.I.A.'s inspector general showed up yesterday for the searches.
Dusty's C.I.A. office and his house in a nearby Virginia suburb were examined.
The dolts at F.B.I. headquarters could not get it together to search Zacarias Moussaoui's computer before 9/11, but now we have the F.B.I. searching the C.I.A.
That's not progress. </font>
Hayden confirmed as CIA chief
WTF is this? i thought we were supposed to learn all this new shit about the NSA wiretapping and domestic call datamining with this golden opportunity for the congress to assert its oversight authority.
oh well.
Hayden confirmed as CIA chief
By Richard Cowan and David Morgan
Fri May 26, 3:36 PM ET
The U.S. Senate confirmed Gen. Michael Hayden on Friday as the next CIA director, with the Bush administration hoping he will help reinvigorate an agency battered by a string of intelligence failures.
Hayden, 61, takes over America's most storied spy agency with a pledge to boost morale and make it more aggressive after it was caught flat-footed on the September 11, 2001 attacks and provided flawed intelligence about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Hayden was confirmed on a 78-15 vote, providing a broad bipartisan endorsement to the architect of President George W. Bush's domestic spying program. Hayden has been principal deputy to U.S. intelligence chief John Negroponte up to now.
Bush applauded the Senate's bipartisan vote and said of Hayden, "Winning the war on terror requires that America have the best intelligence possible and his strong leadership will ensure that we do."
Hayden replaces Porter Goss, who was forced to resign earlier this month after clashing with Negroponte amid widespread concern about the future of the spy agency.
Twenty-six Democrats and the Senate's lone independent joined 51 Republicans voting for Hayden. Only one Republican, Pennsylvania's Arlen Specter, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, voted against Hayden and he said it was in protest over actions by National Security Agency.
Hayden, an Air Force general, was NSA director when Bush ordered the domestic eavesdropping program in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Critics say it exceeds the president's constitutional powers and violates a federal law requiring court warrants for eavesdropping inside the United States.
Specter said the Bush administration had not fully complied with a law on notifying Congress of the spying program, which allows for monitoring of international phone calls and e-mails of U.S. citizens without warrants while pursuing al Qaeda suspects.
Instead, a select group of the committee was briefed, with a full briefing only "in the few days prior to the confirmation hearings on General Hayden," Specter said.
In unusually blunt language about fellow Republicans, Specter said his Judiciary Committee "was stonewalled, plain and simple," by the Bush administration when the panel tried to get information about domestic surveillance from Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
Besides Specter, dissenting votes came from 14 Democrats who expressed concern over the NSA spying program.
Sen. Edward Kennedy (news, bio, voting record) of Massachusetts was one of those Democrats. "Until there is a full accounting of the surveillance program, I cannot in good conscience support a promotion for its chief architect," Kennedy said.
But most Democrats appeared to take the lead of influential party members including Sen. John Rockefeller (news, bio, voting record) of West Virginia, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who has called Hayden an experienced and independent leader capable of restoring the CIA's credibility.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060526...oxZ.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
WTF is this? i thought we were supposed to learn all this new shit about the NSA wiretapping and domestic call datamining with this golden opportunity for the congress to assert its oversight authority.
oh well.
Hayden confirmed as CIA chief
By Richard Cowan and David Morgan
Fri May 26, 3:36 PM ET
The U.S. Senate confirmed Gen. Michael Hayden on Friday as the next CIA director, with the Bush administration hoping he will help reinvigorate an agency battered by a string of intelligence failures.
Hayden, 61, takes over America's most storied spy agency with a pledge to boost morale and make it more aggressive after it was caught flat-footed on the September 11, 2001 attacks and provided flawed intelligence about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Hayden was confirmed on a 78-15 vote, providing a broad bipartisan endorsement to the architect of President George W. Bush's domestic spying program. Hayden has been principal deputy to U.S. intelligence chief John Negroponte up to now.
Bush applauded the Senate's bipartisan vote and said of Hayden, "Winning the war on terror requires that America have the best intelligence possible and his strong leadership will ensure that we do."
Hayden replaces Porter Goss, who was forced to resign earlier this month after clashing with Negroponte amid widespread concern about the future of the spy agency.
Twenty-six Democrats and the Senate's lone independent joined 51 Republicans voting for Hayden. Only one Republican, Pennsylvania's Arlen Specter, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, voted against Hayden and he said it was in protest over actions by National Security Agency.
Hayden, an Air Force general, was NSA director when Bush ordered the domestic eavesdropping program in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Critics say it exceeds the president's constitutional powers and violates a federal law requiring court warrants for eavesdropping inside the United States.
Specter said the Bush administration had not fully complied with a law on notifying Congress of the spying program, which allows for monitoring of international phone calls and e-mails of U.S. citizens without warrants while pursuing al Qaeda suspects.
Instead, a select group of the committee was briefed, with a full briefing only "in the few days prior to the confirmation hearings on General Hayden," Specter said.
In unusually blunt language about fellow Republicans, Specter said his Judiciary Committee "was stonewalled, plain and simple," by the Bush administration when the panel tried to get information about domestic surveillance from Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
Besides Specter, dissenting votes came from 14 Democrats who expressed concern over the NSA spying program.
Sen. Edward Kennedy (news, bio, voting record) of Massachusetts was one of those Democrats. "Until there is a full accounting of the surveillance program, I cannot in good conscience support a promotion for its chief architect," Kennedy said.
But most Democrats appeared to take the lead of influential party members including Sen. John Rockefeller (news, bio, voting record) of West Virginia, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who has called Hayden an experienced and independent leader capable of restoring the CIA's credibility.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060526...oxZ.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
<img src="http://www.thenation.com/images/logo_doc.gif">
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
Hayden Hijinks</font>
<font face="trebuchet ms, verdana" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
<img src="http://www.thenation.com/images/people/john_nichols.jpg">
by John Nichols
May 26, 2006</b>
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=86582
If there actually was an opposition party in Washington, the nomination of Air Force General Michael Hayden to serve as director of the Central Intelligence Agency would have been doomed from the start.
Hayden's involvement as head of the National Security Agency with the illegal warrantless wiretapping program initiated by the Bush administration, his role in the secret accumulation of the phone records of tens of millions of Americans for surveillance purposes, his unapologetic rejection of the rule of law and his limited acquaintance with the Constitution would surely have stalled his nomination. And the fact that a member of the military should not head the civilian intelligence agency that is charged with provided unbiased information to elected officials – as opposed to the Pentagon line – would have finished Hayden off.
In the face of a united Democratic opposition, a sufficient number of Senate Republicans, ill at ease with the administration's reckless approach and increasingly concerned about the damage President Bush and his aides are doing to their party's credibility and political prospects, would have abandoned Hayden.
Unfortunately, there is no opposition party in Washington.
There is, instead, a Democratic Party that, when push comes to shove regularly allows itself to be shoved.
So it come as little surprise that Hayden's nomination has sailed through the Senate, winning approval Friday by a 78-15 vote. Most Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, joined the vast majority of Republicans in rubberstamping George W. Bush's poke-in-the-eye pick to head the CIA.
The die was cast when the Hayden nomination was considered by the Senate Intelligence Committee. Four Democrats who should know better – California's Dianne Feinstein, West Virginia's Jay Rockefeller, Michigan's Carl Levin and Maryland's Barbara Mikulski -- voted with the united Republican majority to approve the appointment. Then, the Senate Armed Committee casually voted to reappoint Hayden as a four-star general, a move that effectively signaled surrender in the debate over whether the CIA should be headed by a military man.
In this disappointing scenario, it should be noted that a handful of Democrats did attempt to check and balance a lawless president by refusing to support his equally lawless nominee. Voting against Hayden's nomination were Democrats Evan Bayh of Indiana, Maria Cantwell of Washington, Hillary Clinton of New York, Mark Dayton of Minnesota, Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, Dick Durbin and Barack Obama of Illinois, Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, Tom Harkin of Iowa, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry of Massachusetts, Bob Menendez of New Jersey and Ron Wyden of Oregon.
Intriguingly, the dissident Democrats were joined in their opposition to Hayden by Senate Judiciary Committee chair Arlen Specter, R-Pennsylvania, who has been increasingly restive regarding the administration's assault on basic freedoms.
Predictably, the Senate's most diligent critic of the administration's reckless disregard for the rule of law was the most outspoken objector to Hayden's nomination.
"I voted against the nomination of General Michael Hayden to be Director of the CIA because I am not convinced that the nominee respects the rule of law and Congress's oversight responsibilities," explained Wisconsin Democrat Russ Feingold, who bluntly declared that, "as Director of the NSA, General Hayden directed an illegal program that put Americans on American soil under surveillance without the legally required approval of a judge."
"Our country needs a CIA Director who is committed to fighting terrorism aggressively without breaking the law or infringing on the rights of Americans. General Hayden's role in implementing and publicly defending the warrantless surveillance program does not give me confidence that he is capable of fulfilling this important responsibility," explained Feingold, who cast one of the three dissenting votes when the Hayden nomination was considered by the intelligence committee.
Noting that Hayden had failed in his testimony before the Intelligence Committee to express any reservations about the administration past misdeeds, that the general had evidenced little respect for congressional oversight and that he gave misleading testimony to the Intelligence Committee in 2002, Feingold concluded that, "The stakes are high. Al Qaeda and its affiliates seek to destroy us. We must fight back and we must join this fight together, as a nation. But when Administration officials ignore the law and ignore the other branches of government, it distracts us from fighting our enemies. I am disappointed that the President decided to make such a controversial nomination at this time. While I defer to Presidents in considering nominations to positions in the executive branch, I cannot vote for a nominee whose conduct raises such troubling questions about his adherence to the rule of law."
If there actually was an opposition party in Washington, Feingold's position would be its official stance. Instead, the man who has fought a lonely battle to censure the president for initiating and maintaining an illegal domestic surveillance program, is still dismissed by most of his fellow Democrats as too aggressive, too principled, too committed to the Constitution. So it goes, as the majority of Feingold's Democratic colleagues continue to promote the nominations and the policies of a failed president who polls tell us now has the approval of less than one-third of Americans.
</font>
<font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">
Hayden Hijinks</font>
<font face="trebuchet ms, verdana" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
<img src="http://www.thenation.com/images/people/john_nichols.jpg">
by John Nichols
May 26, 2006</b>
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=86582
If there actually was an opposition party in Washington, the nomination of Air Force General Michael Hayden to serve as director of the Central Intelligence Agency would have been doomed from the start.
Hayden's involvement as head of the National Security Agency with the illegal warrantless wiretapping program initiated by the Bush administration, his role in the secret accumulation of the phone records of tens of millions of Americans for surveillance purposes, his unapologetic rejection of the rule of law and his limited acquaintance with the Constitution would surely have stalled his nomination. And the fact that a member of the military should not head the civilian intelligence agency that is charged with provided unbiased information to elected officials – as opposed to the Pentagon line – would have finished Hayden off.
In the face of a united Democratic opposition, a sufficient number of Senate Republicans, ill at ease with the administration's reckless approach and increasingly concerned about the damage President Bush and his aides are doing to their party's credibility and political prospects, would have abandoned Hayden.
Unfortunately, there is no opposition party in Washington.
There is, instead, a Democratic Party that, when push comes to shove regularly allows itself to be shoved.
So it come as little surprise that Hayden's nomination has sailed through the Senate, winning approval Friday by a 78-15 vote. Most Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, joined the vast majority of Republicans in rubberstamping George W. Bush's poke-in-the-eye pick to head the CIA.
The die was cast when the Hayden nomination was considered by the Senate Intelligence Committee. Four Democrats who should know better – California's Dianne Feinstein, West Virginia's Jay Rockefeller, Michigan's Carl Levin and Maryland's Barbara Mikulski -- voted with the united Republican majority to approve the appointment. Then, the Senate Armed Committee casually voted to reappoint Hayden as a four-star general, a move that effectively signaled surrender in the debate over whether the CIA should be headed by a military man.
In this disappointing scenario, it should be noted that a handful of Democrats did attempt to check and balance a lawless president by refusing to support his equally lawless nominee. Voting against Hayden's nomination were Democrats Evan Bayh of Indiana, Maria Cantwell of Washington, Hillary Clinton of New York, Mark Dayton of Minnesota, Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, Dick Durbin and Barack Obama of Illinois, Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, Tom Harkin of Iowa, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry of Massachusetts, Bob Menendez of New Jersey and Ron Wyden of Oregon.
Intriguingly, the dissident Democrats were joined in their opposition to Hayden by Senate Judiciary Committee chair Arlen Specter, R-Pennsylvania, who has been increasingly restive regarding the administration's assault on basic freedoms.
Predictably, the Senate's most diligent critic of the administration's reckless disregard for the rule of law was the most outspoken objector to Hayden's nomination.
"I voted against the nomination of General Michael Hayden to be Director of the CIA because I am not convinced that the nominee respects the rule of law and Congress's oversight responsibilities," explained Wisconsin Democrat Russ Feingold, who bluntly declared that, "as Director of the NSA, General Hayden directed an illegal program that put Americans on American soil under surveillance without the legally required approval of a judge."
"Our country needs a CIA Director who is committed to fighting terrorism aggressively without breaking the law or infringing on the rights of Americans. General Hayden's role in implementing and publicly defending the warrantless surveillance program does not give me confidence that he is capable of fulfilling this important responsibility," explained Feingold, who cast one of the three dissenting votes when the Hayden nomination was considered by the intelligence committee.
Noting that Hayden had failed in his testimony before the Intelligence Committee to express any reservations about the administration past misdeeds, that the general had evidenced little respect for congressional oversight and that he gave misleading testimony to the Intelligence Committee in 2002, Feingold concluded that, "The stakes are high. Al Qaeda and its affiliates seek to destroy us. We must fight back and we must join this fight together, as a nation. But when Administration officials ignore the law and ignore the other branches of government, it distracts us from fighting our enemies. I am disappointed that the President decided to make such a controversial nomination at this time. While I defer to Presidents in considering nominations to positions in the executive branch, I cannot vote for a nominee whose conduct raises such troubling questions about his adherence to the rule of law."
If there actually was an opposition party in Washington, Feingold's position would be its official stance. Instead, the man who has fought a lonely battle to censure the president for initiating and maintaining an illegal domestic surveillance program, is still dismissed by most of his fellow Democrats as too aggressive, too principled, too committed to the Constitution. So it goes, as the majority of Feingold's Democratic colleagues continue to promote the nominations and the policies of a failed president who polls tell us now has the approval of less than one-third of Americans.
</font>
feingold and the other extreme left liberals like you actually have a problem with daschle, pelosi, and reid. they are the ones that agreed with the republican congressional leaders that no attempt be made to actually change the law because the program could never be kept a secret if they tried despite the administration suggesting the law be changed.
but no one cares about that little detail. bush broke the law because our elected representatives we designate as lawmakers told him to do it because they cant keep a secret.
good times, good times.
but no one cares about that little detail. bush broke the law because our elected representatives we designate as lawmakers told him to do it because they cant keep a secret.
good times, good times.
<font face="verdana" size="4" color="#333333">
Excellent article in this (August 2006) VANITY FAIR exposing RepubliKlan pornocracy; Porter Goss, Duke Cunningham Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, Congressman Jerry Lewis, the entire miscreant crew.
Read the whole article (unless you don't like hearing RepubliKlans talking about how they enjoy screwing hookers in the ass). You'll learn all the sordid details of how the Cheney-Rove-bush RepubliKlan Party has turned into a vast criminal enterprise stealing Billions of dollars and are committed to destroy what’s left of the American democracy that they NEVER believed in.</font>
<hr noshade color="#666666" size="8"></hr>
<img src="http://www.vanityfair.com/images/headers/he_logo.gif">
<hr noshade color="#000000" size="4"></hr>
<font face="arial black" size="7" color="#d90000">Washington Babylon</font><font face="tahoma" size="4" color="#0000ff"><b>
California Republican congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham traded military contracts for $2.4 million in antiques, cash, and other booty. He is now in jail, but his case exposed a world of bribery, booze, and broads that reaches into the Pentagon, the C.I.A., and Congress. Washington is wondering: Who's next?</b></font>
<img src="http://www.vanityfair.com/images/features/060705fege01.jpg">
<font face="arial" size="3" color="#ff0000"><b>Congressman Randall “Duke” Cunningham in 2003</b></font>
<font face="georgia" size="3" color="#000000">
<b><font color="#0000FF">
AUGUST 2006</font>
BY JUDY BACHRACH</b>
<font face="microsoft sans serif" color="#000000" size="3">
<a target="_blank" href="http://audio.wnyc.org/lopate/lopate072606e.mp3"><b>
<u>Click here for Radio Interview with author Judy Bachrach </u></a></font></b>
The corruption of Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham, a powerful California Republican, was, as the U.S. Attorney's Office maintains, historically "unparalleled"—an astonishing statement coming in the wake of the Abramoff scandal. A former Vietnam naval pilot who was awarded two Silver Stars and a Purple Heart, Cunningham, now 64, appropriated John Wayne's nickname and first ran for the House with the slogan "A congressman we can be proud of." Indeed, from the moment he arrived in Washington, in 1991, he made it his business to seem larger than life, telling people that his wartime heroics had inspired episodes in the movie Top Gun. His military service and expertise eventually earned him a place on the defense-appropriations subcommittee, with vast sway over the military budget, as well as on the intelligence committee, which oversees the C.I.A. and other spy agencies. Ever ready to defend the integrity of the armed forces, as he saw it, Duke excoriated Democrats who wanted to cut the defense budget, calling them the same people "who would put homos in the military."
But in November, Cunningham's heroic image came crashing down, and his swagger evaporated when he pleaded guilty to accepting $2.4 million in bribes from military contractors in exchange for pressuring the Pentagon to buy their products and services. The government believes he was bribed chiefly by two men, identified in court documents as "co-conspirator No. 1" and "co-conspirator No. 2," now known to be Brent Wilkes and his protégé Mitchell Wade. (Wilkes has vigorously denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged with any crimes in this case.) The products they hawked—computer software to scan and convert military maps, drawings, and documents into digital format—lacked glamour, perhaps, but they made the two entrepreneurs and Cunningham wealthy, arrogant, and even reckless, courtesy of a compliant Pentagon. Wilkes's two dozen or so firms, in California and Virginia, raked in $100 million over the last decade, while Wade's Washington-based MZM Inc. has gotten $150 million since 2002.
According to prosecutors, Wilkes and Wade generously remunerated Duke Cunningham for steering government business their way. Wilkes, prosecutors allege, gave Cunningham more than $600,000 in bribes, including two checks totaling $100,000 and $525,000 to pay off a mortgage. (Wilkes, through his attorney, denies these allegations.) In February, Wade pleaded guilty to bribing Cunningham with over $1 million—but he operated with more panache, indulging Cunningham's taste for outsize antiques. The trove he offered included Persian and Indian rugs, sleek Louis-Philippe and Restoration commodes, a $24,000 Victorian china hutch, leaded-glass cabinets, and silver candlesticks worth $5,600. "Duke liked his antiques big and he liked them expensive," explains a Maryland antiques dealer, who despaired of his taste. (Duke got other gifts as well: a secondhand Rolls-Royce and the use of Wade's 42-foot boat, renamed the Duke-Stir.)
The truth is no one knows if the $2.4 million in bribes Cunningham has admitted taking in his guilty plea is the final total. Duke's been at it for some time. In fact, right up to the end, the Maryland antiques dealer tells me, Cunningham was trying to get her to put one of his valuable 19th-century armoires in storage, "anywhere, he didn't care where," as long as it was far from the government's prying eyes. "Very immature, thinking the rules of the game didn't apply to him," the dealer says. But why should they? For years he had been running the game. (Cunningham's attorney, K. Lee Blalack II, refuses to comment on the substance of the case.)
In March, Cunningham was sentenced to eight years and four months in prison—the harshest sentence ever received by an ex-congressman for corruption. But the investigations are far from over, and allegations continue to surface implicating other legislators and government officials. California Republican congressman Jerry Lewis, head of the House committee on appropriations, is currently being investigated. So is Wilkes's best friend from high-school days, Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, who was until recently No. 3 at the C.I.A., and who is alleged to have accepted lavish favors from Wilkes—a trip to a Honolulu estate, for instance, renting for $50,000 per week—in exchange for arranging lucrative C.I.A. contracts for his friend. (Wilkes, Lewis, and Foggo have denied any wrongdoing.) Republican congresswoman and senatorial candidate Katherine Harris, of Florida, a source familiar with her activities tells me, is also being scrutinized for her dealings with Wade—in particular, for receiving $32,000 in illegal campaign donations, and for a lavish dinner she enjoyed last year for which he paid more than $3,300. (Harris says that she did not know the donations were illegal and has since given the money to charity.) In addition, Wade, who is cooperating with the authorities, has told the F.B.I. that Wilkes kept hospitality suites in the Watergate Hotel and Westin Grand in order to entertain legislators and government officials with evenings of poker, cigars, and, on occasion, for Cunningham, prostitutes.
Tens of thousands of pages of congressional documents going as far back as 1997 have been demanded by the U.S. Attorney's Office in San Diego. The C.I.A., Pentagon, I.R.S., and F.B.I. are conducting investigations, and at least three congressional committees are cooperating in hopelessly tardy fashion. "We are scrubbing" is how a staffer on the intelligence committee puts it. Washington is unraveling.
"What these revelations provide is a window into Babylon or the last stages of Rome," explains a source with knowledge of the multiple ongoing investigations. "Many felonies went undetected because in the Defense Department a lot goes on in secret, and these crimes grew in the shadow of both 9/11 and one-party rule—with little scrutiny. So what you're looking at is a world where money, secrecy, sex, and indulgence were all in play. Where everyone is guilty of something."
In June 2004—in the middle of the Caucus Room, a crowded Washington restaurant—Cunningham accepted a fat envelope from Wade. "What's in it?" asked David Heil, Cunningham's chief of staff. Money to repair the Duke-Stir, $6,500 in cash, Cunningham told him. Several months later the aide, who had long been concerned about his boss's misdeeds—so much so that he personally checked Cunningham's real-estate records in California—begged Cunningham to resign. "This is stupid! It's insane!" the aide supposedly said. "I would bet my own house this whole thing will come out." Cunningham listened to this lecture, silent and shamefaced, but he didn't resign. Instead, his chief of staff did.
Heil's prediction came true when Marcus Stern, of the Copley News Service, broke a story last spring in The San Diego Union-Tribune about a very profitable real-estate transaction Duke made in 2003. That year the congressman bought a new, $2.6 million house in Rancho Santa Fe, a bucolic area of estates in the northwestern part of his district, in San Diego County. To do so he sold his old house, in Del Mar, to Wade for $1.675 million. This was $700,000 more than it was worth. In fact, Wade, who never moved into the house, sold it for that much less nine months later.
Subsequent stories about Cunningham in The San Diego Union-Tribune (which shared a 2006 Pulitzer Prize with the Copley News Service for superb reporting on the Cunningham scandal) were followed by intense interest in the congressman by the U.S. Attorney's Office in San Diego. Last year, this caused him to sink into a depression that included thoughts of suicide. He wasn't wholly to blame for his troubles, Cunningham later told Saul Faerstein, a Beverly Hills psychiatrist. He'd been led astray, his "moral and religious values" perverted by unwholesome friends. "He recognizes now that Wade and others in Washington were part of a culture of corruption," wrote Faerstein, an expert for the defense in the O. J. Simpson trial, who was hired by Cunningham's lawyer in an effort to obtain a lighter sentence for his client. "He is troubled he didn't see the motives of the people he trusted." In fact, Faerstein wrote to the court, he found Cunningham "naïve in some ways, always trying to see the best qualities in people."
Do you know that Cunningham wrote a "bribe menu," detailing how many hundreds of thousands he should be paid for defense contracts, right under the bald eagle on his House of Representatives stationery? I ask the psychiatrist. Did Duke tell you he tried to inveigle innocent people into covering up his moneymaking schemes? "That was certainly quite damning…. But I never heard about that until later," says the psychiatrist. "I asked Cunningham's lawyer, 'Why didn't you provide me with that information?' They told me they gave me what I needed…. I am not very happy I didn't know all the facts." (Blalack says, "We made available to Dr. Faerstein all of the evidence that was in our possession.")
So, even as he was pleading guilty, Duke wasn't straight with you? I ask. "No," says Faerstein. "If I'd known about those things, I would have seen he was not so much influenced by the culture of corruption as part of the culture of corruption."
When he tearfully informed the psychiatrist that he "came to Washington to do good" and that for most of his tenure he "did good and was not involved in illegal or unethical conduct," Cunningham probably believed every syllable. The son of a Union Oil truckdriver, he was born in Los Angeles and grew up in rural Missouri, where, according to Faerstein's psychiatric evaluation, he was "raised with traditional values," doing farm work, such as forking hay and driving tractors. As a young man, Cunningham worked as a teacher and swimming coach. He married twice, the first time in his senior year of college to Susan Albrecht. They adopted a son, Todd, now 37, who in 1997 was arrested for possession with intent to distribute 400 pounds of marijuana. Cunningham and Susan were divorced in 1973. A year later he married his current wife, Nancy. The couple has two daughters, April, 27, and Carrie, 24. Both Cunningham families appear to have suffered from Duke's long absences. In court for Todd's marijuana sentencing, he admitted he had spent only a month a year with his son after he and his wife divorced, and April Cunningham, now a librarian, recently declared in court papers, "My father was often not with my family throughout my childhood."
In 1967, Cunningham joined the navy, where he became a fighter pilot. It was Vietnam, where he flew an F-4 Phantom, that changed his life and ambitions. In May 1972, he shot down five North Vietnamese MiGs to become the war's first "ace." Around this time he took the pilot call sign "Duke." It was a name he kept on his return to civilian life, in 1987. Faerstein believes it symbolizes both his strength and his undoing: "'Duke' became an outsized personification of Randall Cunningham," Faerstein wrote. "It is possible that his extraordinary deeds in the service planted a subconscious sense of entitlement."
That "outsized personification" would mark every step of Cunningham's political career. Two years after his election to Congress he announced that the liberal leadership of the House should be "lined up and shot." During a debate on Bosnia, he engaged in a physical scuffle (broken up by Capitol police) with Representative James Moran, a Virginia Democrat. In 1997, when Cunningham's suspicious enthusiasm for projects going to Brent Wilkes's companies was noted by the press, the congressman stated, "I'm on the side of the angels here." Anyone who questioned his intentions, said Duke, can "go to hell."
Cunningham is believed to have been introduced to Wilkes, now 51, in the early 90s by Congressman Bill Lowery (whose seat Cunningham would fill after Lowery and his wife were discovered to have written 300 bad checks on the House bank). Wilkes's father, like Cunningham a naval pilot, was killed in a 1959 accident while taking off from an aircraft carrier. Wilkes grew up poor, raised by his widowed mother near a San Diego naval base. At San Diego State University, he roomed with his high-school football buddy Kyle Dustin "Dusty" Foggo, and both were active in the Young Republicans, as was Lowery. After graduation, Wilkes moved to Washington, D.C., where, I am told, he accompanied groups of congressmen, including Lowery, to fly down to Central America to hang out with Dusty Foggo, by then a C.I.A. agent who was working with the contras to overthrow the Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
Every time Wilkes was asked by Tom Casey, a California defense contractor who would eventually work with him, how he got to be so friendly with Lowery and other congressmen, the answer was always the same, Casey tells me: "Honduras." Specifically, Casey adds, Wilkes described sexual encounters between congressmen and women from Honduran villages. The San Diego Union-Tribune reports similar recollections, attributing them to three of Wilkes's former friends. (Through his attorney Nancy Luque, Wilkes denies having ever traveled to Honduras with congressmen. Lowery's lawyer, Lanny Breuer, says that when his client was a congressman he did indeed go "on a couple of trips with Wilkes to Central America." However, he adds, Lowery "absolutely denies being involved with any women with Wilkes." Foggo's attorney says that Foggo never met congressmen in Honduras.)
By the early 1990s, Wilkes had returned to California, where he was "beyond broke," recalls Casey. "He lived in a rented house and carpooled in a Chevy Cavalier." It was at this point that Wilkes began to work with Casey at Audre, Inc., a Rancho Bernardo producer of automated document-conversion systems (with defense applications). Casey, the firm's founder and C.E.O., says he paid him about $90,000 a year to market the product and to lobby Washington officials and legislators. On trips to Washington, Casey recalls, Wilkes was able to usher him into the presence of important members of the armed-services and appropriations committees, including, most notably, Lowery and Lowery's closest friend on the latter, fellow California Republican Jerry Lewis, now 71. The genteel Lewis and the earthy Lowery reportedly loved to dine and even vacation together. "Everyone on the defense committee always works cooperatively," says Casey, who realized pretty quickly that no money came his way without their support. "It was team play, and they emphasized that to me constantly."
Wilkes also introduced Casey to Dusty Foggo, who often passed through Washington. Around 1994, during a visit to a Washington strip club, Casey says, Foggo wore a gun in a shoulder holster and flashed his identification at the club doorman. He was promptly seated by the stage. "Foggo sits there the whole night telling me how he likes to fuck girls in the ass," Casey recalls. "He sees a girl there, he jabs you and says, 'She's ready to go—let's double-team her.' The weirdest combination of sex and domination! And Wilkes, he's just laughing the whole time." (Through an attorney, Foggo says that this incident never happened. According to his lawyer, Wilkes denies visiting strip clubs in adulthood.)
asey says that Wilkes soon felt cocky enough to ask him for $148,000 a month for a Washington office, with complete discretionary control of funds. He also wanted to rent hotel "hospitality suites" for congressmen, the idea being, as Casey recalls, "these are fun-loving guys, they get tired of being in an office all day, and yet they have to be in proximity of the Capitol to vote. So we'll have booze and bedrooms for them to sleep in." Casey and two former Audre executives say that this plan was vetoed, as was, says Casey, the two million Audre share options Wilkes had requested. (Wilkes's attorney responds: "There may have been a discussion about creating [an office]. The funds would have been for technical and program-management people…. Audre offered Wilkes stock as an incentive plan, but he never received any." And "there is no truth" to the hospitality-suite allegation. She adds, "Nothing Casey says can be relied upon.… He apparently harbors ill will towards Wilkes for leaving Audre behind to become successful.")
Wilkes left Audre and in 1995 launched a competing firm, ADCS. Soon he started giving money to Cunningham's campaign and PAC. It didn't take long to get the desired results, especially after Cunningham obtained a seat on the defense-appropriations subcommittee, in 1997. In July 1999, the government says, Wilkes wrote for Cunningham's benefit a memo helpfully entitled "Talking Points," a copy of which is in court documents. Printed in capital letters, the memo is written in a tone edged with all the righteous rage felt by the author. "WE NEED $10 M[ILLION] MORE IMMEDIATELY," Cunningham was to instruct a Pentagon official. "THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT AND IF YOU CANNOT RESOLVE THIS, OTHERS WILL BE CALLING ALSO." (Wilkes's attorney would not comment.) It is unknown if any calls were made, but Cunningham and Lewis held a joint press conference in Washington to announce they were cutting nearly $2 billion from the F-22 Raptor fighter-jet program, which both had initially supported. Shortly thereafter, $5 million more was allocated by the military for Wilkes's company, and in October most of the F-22 money was restored. (Through his spokesman, Lewis says he was unaware of Cunningham's efforts to secure funding for ADCS.)
"The enabler in this story is the Pentagon," explains someone familiar with the investigation. "To get what it wants—the F-22, say, or better intelligence—it goes along and funds the shoddy stuff Cunningham and [Wilkes] want. It's thinking, 'Cunningham will fund the Taj Mahal of intelligence for us as long as we take care of his friends.'"
Within a year of his victorious fight with the Pentagon, Cunningham claims, he received $100,000 from Wilkes. Gone were the days when Wilkes was cash-strapped. In 1999 he and his wife, Regina, bought a $1.4 million gated home with a tennis court and pool in a suburb of San Diego. In 2003 he built an $11 million glass office building in Poway, 20 miles north of San Diego, as his business headquarters. He and Regina donated generously to his alma mater, San Diego State University, so much that until recently it was rumored that its College of Business Administration was going to name itself after him. "Boom shaka-laka!" Wilkes used to shout in his more bouyant moments, at the height of his prosperity, or, alternatively, "Yeah, baby!"
In 2000, Wilkes and ADCS became "too hot to deal with," a source familiar with the situation tells me. A Pentagon official believed they had fraudulently billed $750,000 for unfinished work scanning maps of the Panama Canal Zone. (Wilkes's lawyer declares, "If there was any fraud, Wilkes was unaware of it because he was only a subcontractor and not doing the billing.") At this point, Wilkes hired "co-conspirator No. 2," Mitchell Wade, who would act for him in winning new government contracts. Wade, now 47, was a former Pentagon intelligence official with formidable contacts in the military, lavish tastes, and—most important—a profound understanding of the "black world" of classified intelligence, which Wilkes didn't know much about. A graduate of George Washington University, Wade had been a Middle East desk officer at the Pentagon during Desert Storm and was awarded a Desert Storm medal. In 1993, he had set up the defense contracting firm MZM—a name based on the first names of his children, Matthew, Zachary, and Morgan—and although the company posted no revenue for its first six years, it flourished after that.
At first, Wade studied Wilkes carefully: "Everything he learned, he learned from Wilkes," says a friend, and the two worked together closely. In 2004, Cunningham appropriated nearly $6 million for MZM's data-storage systems, which were worth "substantially less," prosecutors claim. They were actually delivered by Wilkes's ADCS, which ended up with $4.8 million of the total.
However, after a few years as associates, Wade and Wilkes experienced a growing disaffection with each other. "Wade was carrying the subcontracts for Wilkes, and taking the political heat," I am told by a source close to Wade. In time Wade would outstrip his mentor. He threw massive parties at Washington's Four Seasons Hotel, where, one guest estimates, "it cost $200 a person: filet mignon, alcohol, champagne. He was actually smart about the image he projected."
Soon, Wade developed his own relationship with Cunningham. "Mitch, I'm going to make you somebody," Cunningham promised in November 2001, after selecting $12,000 worth of antiques paid for by his new friend, and he was true to his word: Wade did become somebody. He was able to buy a $3 million house in Washington's prized Kalorama area. His company, MZM, operated out of a beautiful four-story Victorian house on Dupont Circle, packed with 19th-century partners desks and ruby-colored Oriental rugs.
Wade paid lofty salaries—$105,000 for an entry-level job, in one case, with a promise to pay off graduate-school debts at $6,000 a year. "I told my wife it was just like John Grisham's novel The Firm," recalls one former employee. "Everything was compartmentalized, and if it wasn't your business, you had no business knowing about it."
"Absolutely, it was very secretive," Cynthia Bruno Wynkoop, who worked at MZM from 2001 until 2004, tells me. In fact, a lot of the work done by the firm was very secretive as well. Wynkoop, a lawyer, was hired out to work in Arlington, Virginia, on the Pentagon's Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA), with computer systems processing specific data. "Yes, you could call it data mining," she says.
She was troubled by her boss, though. "Of course, I was pressured to give money to certain candidates—everyone was," says Wynkoop. "[North Carolina Republican senator] Elizabeth Dole and [Virginia Republican] representative Virgil Goode—they were highly recommended." (Goode's rural district is the site of an MZM facility.) "Wade would make remarks and let you know." She says she ended up giving $1,000 to the company PAC and $500 to each candidate. Indeed, Wade would eventually inform prosecutors, he not only pressured employees to make political contributions, in violation of federal election laws, but also illegally repaid some—in cash.
Two years ago, Katherine Harris (best known as the Florida secretary of state who presided over the agonizing 2000 presidential recount, and now more obliquely known in court papers as "Rep. B") went to dinner with Wade—whom she had met through Cunningham—and subsequently got a stack of $2,000 checks for her campaign signed by his employees. Many were written on the same day. Harris would later say she had hardly any idea why—maybe they just liked her politics. (In all, Wade gave her $32,000 in illegal contributions.)
But, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Wade told Harris exactly what he wanted over the dinner, for which he paid $2,800 at Citronelle, an elegant Washington restaurant: lots of federal funding to build a $10 million counter-intelligence facility in her Florida district. They also discussed the possibility of his throwing her a fund-raiser. In vain did Ed Rollins, who was then Harris's campaign strategist, warn the congresswoman (who is not allowed to receive gifts exceeding $50) that a $2,800 dinner and a fund-raiser might be interpreted as a shady quid pro quo for snagging millions of dollars for her benefactor. "Mitch, what a special evening! The best dinner I have ever enjoyed in Washington…. Please let me know if I can ever be of assistance," a thrilled Harris wrote by hand in a letter given to me by a former MZM employee. (After insisting she had "reimbursed" the restaurant for the meal, Harris switched positions recently, saying, "I have donated to a local Florida charity $100, which will more than adequately compensate for the cost of my beverage and appetizer.")
In 2005, Harris had a second dinner with Wade, for which, a friend of his tells me, he paid more than $3,300, and a few months later a Harris aide named Mona Tate Yost was hired by MZM. Although a Harris spokeswoman initially said Yost's contacts with her old congressional office were "purely on a social level," this too turned out to be false. An e-mail I have seen, written in 2005, indicates Yost had promised to approach a top Harris staffer "with a meeting." She was working on an MZM draft of a legislative-funding proposal that would, Wade hoped, underwrite his $10 million counter-intelligence facility. (Yost didn't return phone calls for comment.) An MZM employee, Kay Coles James, e-mailed the company's draft to Harris's office, which ultimately submitted it to the appropriations committee, with some of the language intact. (Possibly because Harris applied for the funding late and the request was ill-written, the money never was allocated. "I think Mitch made a mistake in trying to bribe Harris," a Capitol Hill source says, chuckling. "She's so incompetent she can't be bribed.")
It was Duke Cunningham, however, who was foremost in the thoughts of Wade's employees. The firm honored him with fund-raisers, where some found him a bombastic, boastful fellow, according to an ex-employee. "At one point, Mitch made the comment about Cunningham, 'I own him,'" recalls Richard Peze, an MZM vice president until 2003. "Here's the point I tried to make to Wade. I thought we were putting too much faith in Cunningham…. If the company was going to be successful, we had to stop relying on Wade's benefactors in Congress." Another thing bothered Peze. "I know of two instances where I believe hours were billed to the government that weren't being worked," he says, adding that last summer he talked to Pentagon investigators about his concerns.
But Wade was flying high. Indeed, for a man who was usually so secretive, he could be amazingly indiscreet. "Where's your Rolls-Royce?" one employee asked him. "Duke's driving it now—it's parked in the congressional parking lot," Wade answered. Wynkoop recalls Wade telling her he had bought the yacht, the Duke-Stir, which Cunningham was living on. "I was sitting with Mitch in the Capital Grille restaurant when he phones Duke at midnight! Who ever calls a congressman at midnight?" asks Wynkoop. "It was all very bizarre and very surreal."
Another bizarre circumstance: For a modest $140,000, I learn from the Federal Procurement Data System, MZM was hired to provide computer programming for the Executive Office of the President—a remarkable coup for Wade. One month later he paid exactly $140,000 for the Duke-Stir, which was moved to Cunningham's boatslip. "I knew then that somebody was going to go to jail for that," says a party to the sale. "Duke looked at the boat, and Wade bought it—all in one day. Then they got on the boat and floated away."
Cunningham was not shy about detailing his desires. Above the word "Duke" on his congressional stationery he scrawled the number 16, then the letters BT for "boat," then 140. This meant, his friend Wade later acknowledged to prosecutors, that in return for the congressman's use of the $140,000 boat Wade would get a $16 million contract. For another $50,000, Wade would get a $17 million contract—and so on.
After the news story about the sale of his Del Mar house broke, Cunningham tried to get others to cover his tracks. He called Elizabeth Todd, a local real-estate agent, and pressured her to fax him a letter claiming that 2004 was a buyers' market, a request with which Todd only reluctantly complied, since she knew it to be inaccurate. Next, he wrote a letter to Wade in which, after professing amazement at the low resale price of his former home, he offered to pay the $700,000 difference—but never did. Later that same month, he sent a $16,500 check to a dealer from whom Wade had purchased a few Oriental rugs for him. Along with the money came a handwritten note explaining that he had tried to send the dealer the check earlier, but had misaddressed the envelope. Nor was that the end of his machinations. Last July Duke phoned the Maryland antiques dealer he and Wade had patronized at least half a dozen times. Anxiously, he pleaded with her to recall that he had quietly slipped $35,000 in cash to Wade as compensation for the lavish purchases. "I never saw it, and believe me, $35,000 in cash I would remember!" the dealer tells me.
When the distraught Cunningham called her yet again—this time right before Thanksgiving, just days before he tearfully pleaded guilty—to get the dealer to put his Victorian armoire in storage, a store employee put Cunningham on speakerphone. "What's going on? Am I being taped?" the congressman demanded to know. "Has anyone 'visited' the antique store recently?"
They had, indeed. Months earlier, two female F.B.I. agents, flashing badges and demanding furniture receipts, had visited the store—because Wade had been talking to authorities since June 2005.
He had plenty to say. In fact, according to The Wall Street Journal, Wade was also talking to investigators about his mentor, Brent Wilkes. Specifically, he claimed that Wilkes used a limousine service to ferry escorts to and from assignations with Cunningham in rented suites at Washington's Watergate Hotel and Westin Grand. Federal agents are investigating to see if any other lawmakers were involved with the escorts. (Luque responds, "Brent Wilkes never arranged prostitutes for anyone.") But a source who knows the details of the scandal suggests this is too simple an equation. "People are missing the completeness of the corruption: It wasn't 'Get me a hooker and I'll get you a defense contract from the appropriations committee,'" he says. "It's 'I will take care of you and meet your every wish, need, and fantasy, and in exchange you are going to take care of me!' Wilkes tried to corrupt completely—it was a real omertà thing. And when Mitch Wade came in later and had his relationship with Cunningham, that too moved into a broader scheme, but it was driven by Duke, asking for more and more. 'Get me the boat, the antiques—then pay the costs to move those antiques to California!'" ("This is an absolutely false picture of Brent Wilkes," who conducted his business properly, says Luque.)
Among those rumored to have attended poker nights at Wilkes's hospitality suites were C.I.A. director Porter Goss (although a spokeswoman strongly denies Goss ever went) and Wilkes's old high-school football buddy and college roommate, Dusty Foggo, by this time No. 3 at the C.I.A. Goss, who became C.I.A. director in 2004, had promoted him to executive director. Agency personnel were stunned. Foggo was "a very obscure guy," explains a former top operative. As it turned out, Foggo's sudden rise was due in part to Brant Bassett, a C.I.A. case officer known as "Nine Fingers" after he lost a digit in a motorcycle accident. It was Bassett who told Goss that Foggo was "a very capable man who's done tremendous things for the agency."
Why Goss would take personnel tips from Bassett is anybody's guess. "From time to time Bassett ran aground on judgment issues," recalls Milt Bearden, a former C.I.A. station chief. In 1989, Bassett was reprimanded for inappropriately carrying a gun to a meeting. That same year he sent a prank letter to a C.I.A. agent stationed in Vienna whom he'd heard the K.G.B. was trying to blackmail. "So Bassett wrote the poor guy in Vienna a letter as if he were his lover, describing their supposedly delightful sex acts," reports a source. What Bassett didn't expect was that Cuban intelligence would get hold of his bawdy letter, at which point they tried to blackmail him.
Foggo, too, had problems with his C.I.A. bosses. He was reportedly accused of insubordination by a female superior, who retired shortly after his 2004 promotion. In Frankfurt, where he had been chief of the C.I.A.'s logistics office, a $2-to-$3-million agency contract to supply bottled water to agency personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan was awarded to Archer Logistics, which had no experience in such matters, but which happened to be owned by Foggo's old high-school friend Wilkes. (A lawyer for Foggo claims his client had no idea the firm belonged to Wilkes.) Like Congress, the C.I.A. is used to doling out huge sums, often with little or no oversight. "Look, the agency guys live in a culture where there's tons of money and a lot of it is cash," explains one intelligence source, "where you say, How much cash are we giving that guy, that asset, and what suitcase was it in? The American Tourister?"
In early May, when Foggo arrived for work at Langley, he was told to relinquish his security pass. On the seventh floor of the C.I.A. all sorts of agents—C.I.A., F.B.I., Defense Department, and I.R.S.—were looking for evidence of possible bribery and corruption. When Goss was nudged from office that same month, General Michael V. Hayden, who replaced him, announced that "amateur hour" was over at the C.I.A. "The prosecutors are really focused on Foggo in every one of his postings," a source who has been interviewed by federal prosecutors tells me.
The investigation of Duke Cunningham has touched any number of his associates. Representative Jerry Lewis is reportedly under investigation for dealings with his friend Lowery, as well as for what the Copley News Service has referred to as "steering earmarks [money for pet projects] to certain entities," but he hasn't been contacted by prosecutors "about anything," says his spokesman.
Unlike the federal authorities, Tom Casey has had an uneasy feeling about Lewis for a long time, he says. In the spring of 1993, Casey says, he received an 11 p.m. phone call from Lewis, who had an urgent message: he wanted Casey to hire Lowery as a lobbyist—with remuneration "worth a fortune." After leaving Congress, Lowery had joined a Washington lobbying firm, which became Copeland Lowery & Jacquez, and ties between him and the stately Lewis remain warm to this day. In the last six years Lowery's firm and its clients gave more than $450,000 to Lewis.
"Tom, let's cut to the chase. I want you to get stock options for Bill Lowery" was how Lewis opened their conversation, Casey recalls. Specifically, Casey adds, Lewis suggested that a very large number of Audre stock options issued in Canada be given to Lowery, but put under other names. Lewis's actual words were "I am going to give you a list of names," says Casey, who declined to go along. That was the last time he and Lewis had a pleasant conversation, Casey says. (Through a spokesman, Lewis acknowledges that he "thinks he remembers meeting Tom Casey," but denies the story. "What's described sounds illegal to me," says the spokesperson. Through his lawyer, Lowery also denies any knowledge of the proposed deal.)
In May, Casey discussed his allegations about Lewis (among others) with federal prosecutors—as the unhappy congressman now knows. Lewis is sick to death of the scandal that started with Cunningham. Gone is the fabled cooperative spirit of the defense-appropriations subcommittee. "I have never been as angry toward anyone in my entire career," Lewis recently said of Duke.
Cunningham is now separated from his wife, Nancy, who used to tell friends the Duke-Stir made her "seasick." In court papers, she refers to him as "Mr. Cunningham." In February she sued the government in an effort to retain her share of the proceeds from the sale of the $2.6 million Rancho Santa Fe house.
The main assets of Wade's firm were sold last year and renamed Athena Innovative Solutions, which is led by James C. King, a retired army lieutenant general. Blogger Justin Rood has claimed that King, along with his wife, Jeneane, gave on one day—March 23, 2004—a total of four checks of $2,000 each to Katherine Harris's campaign.
Polls show that in her Senate campaign Harris is badly trailing the Democratic incumbent, Bill Nelson. In May, Florida governor Jeb Bush announced, "I just don't believe she can win."
In June it was revealed by The New York Times that Lowery's prosperous lobbying firm, which earned $7.4 million last year, was dissolving in the face of the investigations. Two Democrats seceded to form their own firm; three Republicans, including Lowery, will compose another.
Wilkes, I am told by a source who has talked to investigators, is not cooperating. ("He will not plead guilty, because he is not guilty," says Luque. "But he has offered to cooperate.") Incensed and invigorated, prosecutors are poring over his campaign contributions, and the Pentagon's inspector general is scrutinizing his contracts. "Before, they were willing to ignore a lot of things. Now they are concentrating on Wilkes and Foggo," says the source.
Wade's sentencing has been deferred because, federal prosecutors believe, "his cooperation will continue for quite some time." (Wade's lawyer Howard Shapiro refuses to comment on this story.) There were early reports that Cunningham was acting mulish with Pentagon investigators, but his lawyer says, "My client's fate depends on how well he cooperates."
Eight years ago Cunningham was diagnosed with prostate cancer and two months later underwent a radical prostatectomy, but the cancer has recurred. He will live, doctors at Bethesda Naval Hospital estimate, perhaps seven years. A long jail term "would likely be a death sentence," Cunningham's lawyer informed the court. Currently, he is expected to serve seven years—although his sentence may be further reduced if the government is satisfied with his revelations. He is to be told shortly which federal prison will be his new, and perhaps final, home.
</font>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="14"></hr>
Excellent article in this (August 2006) VANITY FAIR exposing RepubliKlan pornocracy; Porter Goss, Duke Cunningham Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, Congressman Jerry Lewis, the entire miscreant crew.
Read the whole article (unless you don't like hearing RepubliKlans talking about how they enjoy screwing hookers in the ass). You'll learn all the sordid details of how the Cheney-Rove-bush RepubliKlan Party has turned into a vast criminal enterprise stealing Billions of dollars and are committed to destroy what’s left of the American democracy that they NEVER believed in.</font>
<hr noshade color="#666666" size="8"></hr>
<img src="http://www.vanityfair.com/images/headers/he_logo.gif">
<hr noshade color="#000000" size="4"></hr>
<font face="arial black" size="7" color="#d90000">Washington Babylon</font><font face="tahoma" size="4" color="#0000ff"><b>
California Republican congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham traded military contracts for $2.4 million in antiques, cash, and other booty. He is now in jail, but his case exposed a world of bribery, booze, and broads that reaches into the Pentagon, the C.I.A., and Congress. Washington is wondering: Who's next?</b></font>
<img src="http://www.vanityfair.com/images/features/060705fege01.jpg">
<font face="arial" size="3" color="#ff0000"><b>Congressman Randall “Duke” Cunningham in 2003</b></font>
<font face="georgia" size="3" color="#000000">
<b><font color="#0000FF">
AUGUST 2006</font>
BY JUDY BACHRACH</b>
<font face="microsoft sans serif" color="#000000" size="3">
<a target="_blank" href="http://audio.wnyc.org/lopate/lopate072606e.mp3"><b>
<u>Click here for Radio Interview with author Judy Bachrach </u></a></font></b>
The corruption of Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham, a powerful California Republican, was, as the U.S. Attorney's Office maintains, historically "unparalleled"—an astonishing statement coming in the wake of the Abramoff scandal. A former Vietnam naval pilot who was awarded two Silver Stars and a Purple Heart, Cunningham, now 64, appropriated John Wayne's nickname and first ran for the House with the slogan "A congressman we can be proud of." Indeed, from the moment he arrived in Washington, in 1991, he made it his business to seem larger than life, telling people that his wartime heroics had inspired episodes in the movie Top Gun. His military service and expertise eventually earned him a place on the defense-appropriations subcommittee, with vast sway over the military budget, as well as on the intelligence committee, which oversees the C.I.A. and other spy agencies. Ever ready to defend the integrity of the armed forces, as he saw it, Duke excoriated Democrats who wanted to cut the defense budget, calling them the same people "who would put homos in the military."
But in November, Cunningham's heroic image came crashing down, and his swagger evaporated when he pleaded guilty to accepting $2.4 million in bribes from military contractors in exchange for pressuring the Pentagon to buy their products and services. The government believes he was bribed chiefly by two men, identified in court documents as "co-conspirator No. 1" and "co-conspirator No. 2," now known to be Brent Wilkes and his protégé Mitchell Wade. (Wilkes has vigorously denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged with any crimes in this case.) The products they hawked—computer software to scan and convert military maps, drawings, and documents into digital format—lacked glamour, perhaps, but they made the two entrepreneurs and Cunningham wealthy, arrogant, and even reckless, courtesy of a compliant Pentagon. Wilkes's two dozen or so firms, in California and Virginia, raked in $100 million over the last decade, while Wade's Washington-based MZM Inc. has gotten $150 million since 2002.
According to prosecutors, Wilkes and Wade generously remunerated Duke Cunningham for steering government business their way. Wilkes, prosecutors allege, gave Cunningham more than $600,000 in bribes, including two checks totaling $100,000 and $525,000 to pay off a mortgage. (Wilkes, through his attorney, denies these allegations.) In February, Wade pleaded guilty to bribing Cunningham with over $1 million—but he operated with more panache, indulging Cunningham's taste for outsize antiques. The trove he offered included Persian and Indian rugs, sleek Louis-Philippe and Restoration commodes, a $24,000 Victorian china hutch, leaded-glass cabinets, and silver candlesticks worth $5,600. "Duke liked his antiques big and he liked them expensive," explains a Maryland antiques dealer, who despaired of his taste. (Duke got other gifts as well: a secondhand Rolls-Royce and the use of Wade's 42-foot boat, renamed the Duke-Stir.)
The truth is no one knows if the $2.4 million in bribes Cunningham has admitted taking in his guilty plea is the final total. Duke's been at it for some time. In fact, right up to the end, the Maryland antiques dealer tells me, Cunningham was trying to get her to put one of his valuable 19th-century armoires in storage, "anywhere, he didn't care where," as long as it was far from the government's prying eyes. "Very immature, thinking the rules of the game didn't apply to him," the dealer says. But why should they? For years he had been running the game. (Cunningham's attorney, K. Lee Blalack II, refuses to comment on the substance of the case.)
In March, Cunningham was sentenced to eight years and four months in prison—the harshest sentence ever received by an ex-congressman for corruption. But the investigations are far from over, and allegations continue to surface implicating other legislators and government officials. California Republican congressman Jerry Lewis, head of the House committee on appropriations, is currently being investigated. So is Wilkes's best friend from high-school days, Kyle "Dusty" Foggo, who was until recently No. 3 at the C.I.A., and who is alleged to have accepted lavish favors from Wilkes—a trip to a Honolulu estate, for instance, renting for $50,000 per week—in exchange for arranging lucrative C.I.A. contracts for his friend. (Wilkes, Lewis, and Foggo have denied any wrongdoing.) Republican congresswoman and senatorial candidate Katherine Harris, of Florida, a source familiar with her activities tells me, is also being scrutinized for her dealings with Wade—in particular, for receiving $32,000 in illegal campaign donations, and for a lavish dinner she enjoyed last year for which he paid more than $3,300. (Harris says that she did not know the donations were illegal and has since given the money to charity.) In addition, Wade, who is cooperating with the authorities, has told the F.B.I. that Wilkes kept hospitality suites in the Watergate Hotel and Westin Grand in order to entertain legislators and government officials with evenings of poker, cigars, and, on occasion, for Cunningham, prostitutes.
Tens of thousands of pages of congressional documents going as far back as 1997 have been demanded by the U.S. Attorney's Office in San Diego. The C.I.A., Pentagon, I.R.S., and F.B.I. are conducting investigations, and at least three congressional committees are cooperating in hopelessly tardy fashion. "We are scrubbing" is how a staffer on the intelligence committee puts it. Washington is unraveling.
"What these revelations provide is a window into Babylon or the last stages of Rome," explains a source with knowledge of the multiple ongoing investigations. "Many felonies went undetected because in the Defense Department a lot goes on in secret, and these crimes grew in the shadow of both 9/11 and one-party rule—with little scrutiny. So what you're looking at is a world where money, secrecy, sex, and indulgence were all in play. Where everyone is guilty of something."
In June 2004—in the middle of the Caucus Room, a crowded Washington restaurant—Cunningham accepted a fat envelope from Wade. "What's in it?" asked David Heil, Cunningham's chief of staff. Money to repair the Duke-Stir, $6,500 in cash, Cunningham told him. Several months later the aide, who had long been concerned about his boss's misdeeds—so much so that he personally checked Cunningham's real-estate records in California—begged Cunningham to resign. "This is stupid! It's insane!" the aide supposedly said. "I would bet my own house this whole thing will come out." Cunningham listened to this lecture, silent and shamefaced, but he didn't resign. Instead, his chief of staff did.
Heil's prediction came true when Marcus Stern, of the Copley News Service, broke a story last spring in The San Diego Union-Tribune about a very profitable real-estate transaction Duke made in 2003. That year the congressman bought a new, $2.6 million house in Rancho Santa Fe, a bucolic area of estates in the northwestern part of his district, in San Diego County. To do so he sold his old house, in Del Mar, to Wade for $1.675 million. This was $700,000 more than it was worth. In fact, Wade, who never moved into the house, sold it for that much less nine months later.
Subsequent stories about Cunningham in The San Diego Union-Tribune (which shared a 2006 Pulitzer Prize with the Copley News Service for superb reporting on the Cunningham scandal) were followed by intense interest in the congressman by the U.S. Attorney's Office in San Diego. Last year, this caused him to sink into a depression that included thoughts of suicide. He wasn't wholly to blame for his troubles, Cunningham later told Saul Faerstein, a Beverly Hills psychiatrist. He'd been led astray, his "moral and religious values" perverted by unwholesome friends. "He recognizes now that Wade and others in Washington were part of a culture of corruption," wrote Faerstein, an expert for the defense in the O. J. Simpson trial, who was hired by Cunningham's lawyer in an effort to obtain a lighter sentence for his client. "He is troubled he didn't see the motives of the people he trusted." In fact, Faerstein wrote to the court, he found Cunningham "naïve in some ways, always trying to see the best qualities in people."
Do you know that Cunningham wrote a "bribe menu," detailing how many hundreds of thousands he should be paid for defense contracts, right under the bald eagle on his House of Representatives stationery? I ask the psychiatrist. Did Duke tell you he tried to inveigle innocent people into covering up his moneymaking schemes? "That was certainly quite damning…. But I never heard about that until later," says the psychiatrist. "I asked Cunningham's lawyer, 'Why didn't you provide me with that information?' They told me they gave me what I needed…. I am not very happy I didn't know all the facts." (Blalack says, "We made available to Dr. Faerstein all of the evidence that was in our possession.")
So, even as he was pleading guilty, Duke wasn't straight with you? I ask. "No," says Faerstein. "If I'd known about those things, I would have seen he was not so much influenced by the culture of corruption as part of the culture of corruption."
When he tearfully informed the psychiatrist that he "came to Washington to do good" and that for most of his tenure he "did good and was not involved in illegal or unethical conduct," Cunningham probably believed every syllable. The son of a Union Oil truckdriver, he was born in Los Angeles and grew up in rural Missouri, where, according to Faerstein's psychiatric evaluation, he was "raised with traditional values," doing farm work, such as forking hay and driving tractors. As a young man, Cunningham worked as a teacher and swimming coach. He married twice, the first time in his senior year of college to Susan Albrecht. They adopted a son, Todd, now 37, who in 1997 was arrested for possession with intent to distribute 400 pounds of marijuana. Cunningham and Susan were divorced in 1973. A year later he married his current wife, Nancy. The couple has two daughters, April, 27, and Carrie, 24. Both Cunningham families appear to have suffered from Duke's long absences. In court for Todd's marijuana sentencing, he admitted he had spent only a month a year with his son after he and his wife divorced, and April Cunningham, now a librarian, recently declared in court papers, "My father was often not with my family throughout my childhood."
In 1967, Cunningham joined the navy, where he became a fighter pilot. It was Vietnam, where he flew an F-4 Phantom, that changed his life and ambitions. In May 1972, he shot down five North Vietnamese MiGs to become the war's first "ace." Around this time he took the pilot call sign "Duke." It was a name he kept on his return to civilian life, in 1987. Faerstein believes it symbolizes both his strength and his undoing: "'Duke' became an outsized personification of Randall Cunningham," Faerstein wrote. "It is possible that his extraordinary deeds in the service planted a subconscious sense of entitlement."
That "outsized personification" would mark every step of Cunningham's political career. Two years after his election to Congress he announced that the liberal leadership of the House should be "lined up and shot." During a debate on Bosnia, he engaged in a physical scuffle (broken up by Capitol police) with Representative James Moran, a Virginia Democrat. In 1997, when Cunningham's suspicious enthusiasm for projects going to Brent Wilkes's companies was noted by the press, the congressman stated, "I'm on the side of the angels here." Anyone who questioned his intentions, said Duke, can "go to hell."
Cunningham is believed to have been introduced to Wilkes, now 51, in the early 90s by Congressman Bill Lowery (whose seat Cunningham would fill after Lowery and his wife were discovered to have written 300 bad checks on the House bank). Wilkes's father, like Cunningham a naval pilot, was killed in a 1959 accident while taking off from an aircraft carrier. Wilkes grew up poor, raised by his widowed mother near a San Diego naval base. At San Diego State University, he roomed with his high-school football buddy Kyle Dustin "Dusty" Foggo, and both were active in the Young Republicans, as was Lowery. After graduation, Wilkes moved to Washington, D.C., where, I am told, he accompanied groups of congressmen, including Lowery, to fly down to Central America to hang out with Dusty Foggo, by then a C.I.A. agent who was working with the contras to overthrow the Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
Every time Wilkes was asked by Tom Casey, a California defense contractor who would eventually work with him, how he got to be so friendly with Lowery and other congressmen, the answer was always the same, Casey tells me: "Honduras." Specifically, Casey adds, Wilkes described sexual encounters between congressmen and women from Honduran villages. The San Diego Union-Tribune reports similar recollections, attributing them to three of Wilkes's former friends. (Through his attorney Nancy Luque, Wilkes denies having ever traveled to Honduras with congressmen. Lowery's lawyer, Lanny Breuer, says that when his client was a congressman he did indeed go "on a couple of trips with Wilkes to Central America." However, he adds, Lowery "absolutely denies being involved with any women with Wilkes." Foggo's attorney says that Foggo never met congressmen in Honduras.)
By the early 1990s, Wilkes had returned to California, where he was "beyond broke," recalls Casey. "He lived in a rented house and carpooled in a Chevy Cavalier." It was at this point that Wilkes began to work with Casey at Audre, Inc., a Rancho Bernardo producer of automated document-conversion systems (with defense applications). Casey, the firm's founder and C.E.O., says he paid him about $90,000 a year to market the product and to lobby Washington officials and legislators. On trips to Washington, Casey recalls, Wilkes was able to usher him into the presence of important members of the armed-services and appropriations committees, including, most notably, Lowery and Lowery's closest friend on the latter, fellow California Republican Jerry Lewis, now 71. The genteel Lewis and the earthy Lowery reportedly loved to dine and even vacation together. "Everyone on the defense committee always works cooperatively," says Casey, who realized pretty quickly that no money came his way without their support. "It was team play, and they emphasized that to me constantly."
Wilkes also introduced Casey to Dusty Foggo, who often passed through Washington. Around 1994, during a visit to a Washington strip club, Casey says, Foggo wore a gun in a shoulder holster and flashed his identification at the club doorman. He was promptly seated by the stage. "Foggo sits there the whole night telling me how he likes to fuck girls in the ass," Casey recalls. "He sees a girl there, he jabs you and says, 'She's ready to go—let's double-team her.' The weirdest combination of sex and domination! And Wilkes, he's just laughing the whole time." (Through an attorney, Foggo says that this incident never happened. According to his lawyer, Wilkes denies visiting strip clubs in adulthood.)
asey says that Wilkes soon felt cocky enough to ask him for $148,000 a month for a Washington office, with complete discretionary control of funds. He also wanted to rent hotel "hospitality suites" for congressmen, the idea being, as Casey recalls, "these are fun-loving guys, they get tired of being in an office all day, and yet they have to be in proximity of the Capitol to vote. So we'll have booze and bedrooms for them to sleep in." Casey and two former Audre executives say that this plan was vetoed, as was, says Casey, the two million Audre share options Wilkes had requested. (Wilkes's attorney responds: "There may have been a discussion about creating [an office]. The funds would have been for technical and program-management people…. Audre offered Wilkes stock as an incentive plan, but he never received any." And "there is no truth" to the hospitality-suite allegation. She adds, "Nothing Casey says can be relied upon.… He apparently harbors ill will towards Wilkes for leaving Audre behind to become successful.")
Wilkes left Audre and in 1995 launched a competing firm, ADCS. Soon he started giving money to Cunningham's campaign and PAC. It didn't take long to get the desired results, especially after Cunningham obtained a seat on the defense-appropriations subcommittee, in 1997. In July 1999, the government says, Wilkes wrote for Cunningham's benefit a memo helpfully entitled "Talking Points," a copy of which is in court documents. Printed in capital letters, the memo is written in a tone edged with all the righteous rage felt by the author. "WE NEED $10 M[ILLION] MORE IMMEDIATELY," Cunningham was to instruct a Pentagon official. "THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT AND IF YOU CANNOT RESOLVE THIS, OTHERS WILL BE CALLING ALSO." (Wilkes's attorney would not comment.) It is unknown if any calls were made, but Cunningham and Lewis held a joint press conference in Washington to announce they were cutting nearly $2 billion from the F-22 Raptor fighter-jet program, which both had initially supported. Shortly thereafter, $5 million more was allocated by the military for Wilkes's company, and in October most of the F-22 money was restored. (Through his spokesman, Lewis says he was unaware of Cunningham's efforts to secure funding for ADCS.)
"The enabler in this story is the Pentagon," explains someone familiar with the investigation. "To get what it wants—the F-22, say, or better intelligence—it goes along and funds the shoddy stuff Cunningham and [Wilkes] want. It's thinking, 'Cunningham will fund the Taj Mahal of intelligence for us as long as we take care of his friends.'"
Within a year of his victorious fight with the Pentagon, Cunningham claims, he received $100,000 from Wilkes. Gone were the days when Wilkes was cash-strapped. In 1999 he and his wife, Regina, bought a $1.4 million gated home with a tennis court and pool in a suburb of San Diego. In 2003 he built an $11 million glass office building in Poway, 20 miles north of San Diego, as his business headquarters. He and Regina donated generously to his alma mater, San Diego State University, so much that until recently it was rumored that its College of Business Administration was going to name itself after him. "Boom shaka-laka!" Wilkes used to shout in his more bouyant moments, at the height of his prosperity, or, alternatively, "Yeah, baby!"
In 2000, Wilkes and ADCS became "too hot to deal with," a source familiar with the situation tells me. A Pentagon official believed they had fraudulently billed $750,000 for unfinished work scanning maps of the Panama Canal Zone. (Wilkes's lawyer declares, "If there was any fraud, Wilkes was unaware of it because he was only a subcontractor and not doing the billing.") At this point, Wilkes hired "co-conspirator No. 2," Mitchell Wade, who would act for him in winning new government contracts. Wade, now 47, was a former Pentagon intelligence official with formidable contacts in the military, lavish tastes, and—most important—a profound understanding of the "black world" of classified intelligence, which Wilkes didn't know much about. A graduate of George Washington University, Wade had been a Middle East desk officer at the Pentagon during Desert Storm and was awarded a Desert Storm medal. In 1993, he had set up the defense contracting firm MZM—a name based on the first names of his children, Matthew, Zachary, and Morgan—and although the company posted no revenue for its first six years, it flourished after that.
At first, Wade studied Wilkes carefully: "Everything he learned, he learned from Wilkes," says a friend, and the two worked together closely. In 2004, Cunningham appropriated nearly $6 million for MZM's data-storage systems, which were worth "substantially less," prosecutors claim. They were actually delivered by Wilkes's ADCS, which ended up with $4.8 million of the total.
However, after a few years as associates, Wade and Wilkes experienced a growing disaffection with each other. "Wade was carrying the subcontracts for Wilkes, and taking the political heat," I am told by a source close to Wade. In time Wade would outstrip his mentor. He threw massive parties at Washington's Four Seasons Hotel, where, one guest estimates, "it cost $200 a person: filet mignon, alcohol, champagne. He was actually smart about the image he projected."
Soon, Wade developed his own relationship with Cunningham. "Mitch, I'm going to make you somebody," Cunningham promised in November 2001, after selecting $12,000 worth of antiques paid for by his new friend, and he was true to his word: Wade did become somebody. He was able to buy a $3 million house in Washington's prized Kalorama area. His company, MZM, operated out of a beautiful four-story Victorian house on Dupont Circle, packed with 19th-century partners desks and ruby-colored Oriental rugs.
Wade paid lofty salaries—$105,000 for an entry-level job, in one case, with a promise to pay off graduate-school debts at $6,000 a year. "I told my wife it was just like John Grisham's novel The Firm," recalls one former employee. "Everything was compartmentalized, and if it wasn't your business, you had no business knowing about it."
"Absolutely, it was very secretive," Cynthia Bruno Wynkoop, who worked at MZM from 2001 until 2004, tells me. In fact, a lot of the work done by the firm was very secretive as well. Wynkoop, a lawyer, was hired out to work in Arlington, Virginia, on the Pentagon's Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA), with computer systems processing specific data. "Yes, you could call it data mining," she says.
She was troubled by her boss, though. "Of course, I was pressured to give money to certain candidates—everyone was," says Wynkoop. "[North Carolina Republican senator] Elizabeth Dole and [Virginia Republican] representative Virgil Goode—they were highly recommended." (Goode's rural district is the site of an MZM facility.) "Wade would make remarks and let you know." She says she ended up giving $1,000 to the company PAC and $500 to each candidate. Indeed, Wade would eventually inform prosecutors, he not only pressured employees to make political contributions, in violation of federal election laws, but also illegally repaid some—in cash.
Two years ago, Katherine Harris (best known as the Florida secretary of state who presided over the agonizing 2000 presidential recount, and now more obliquely known in court papers as "Rep. B") went to dinner with Wade—whom she had met through Cunningham—and subsequently got a stack of $2,000 checks for her campaign signed by his employees. Many were written on the same day. Harris would later say she had hardly any idea why—maybe they just liked her politics. (In all, Wade gave her $32,000 in illegal contributions.)
But, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Wade told Harris exactly what he wanted over the dinner, for which he paid $2,800 at Citronelle, an elegant Washington restaurant: lots of federal funding to build a $10 million counter-intelligence facility in her Florida district. They also discussed the possibility of his throwing her a fund-raiser. In vain did Ed Rollins, who was then Harris's campaign strategist, warn the congresswoman (who is not allowed to receive gifts exceeding $50) that a $2,800 dinner and a fund-raiser might be interpreted as a shady quid pro quo for snagging millions of dollars for her benefactor. "Mitch, what a special evening! The best dinner I have ever enjoyed in Washington…. Please let me know if I can ever be of assistance," a thrilled Harris wrote by hand in a letter given to me by a former MZM employee. (After insisting she had "reimbursed" the restaurant for the meal, Harris switched positions recently, saying, "I have donated to a local Florida charity $100, which will more than adequately compensate for the cost of my beverage and appetizer.")
In 2005, Harris had a second dinner with Wade, for which, a friend of his tells me, he paid more than $3,300, and a few months later a Harris aide named Mona Tate Yost was hired by MZM. Although a Harris spokeswoman initially said Yost's contacts with her old congressional office were "purely on a social level," this too turned out to be false. An e-mail I have seen, written in 2005, indicates Yost had promised to approach a top Harris staffer "with a meeting." She was working on an MZM draft of a legislative-funding proposal that would, Wade hoped, underwrite his $10 million counter-intelligence facility. (Yost didn't return phone calls for comment.) An MZM employee, Kay Coles James, e-mailed the company's draft to Harris's office, which ultimately submitted it to the appropriations committee, with some of the language intact. (Possibly because Harris applied for the funding late and the request was ill-written, the money never was allocated. "I think Mitch made a mistake in trying to bribe Harris," a Capitol Hill source says, chuckling. "She's so incompetent she can't be bribed.")
It was Duke Cunningham, however, who was foremost in the thoughts of Wade's employees. The firm honored him with fund-raisers, where some found him a bombastic, boastful fellow, according to an ex-employee. "At one point, Mitch made the comment about Cunningham, 'I own him,'" recalls Richard Peze, an MZM vice president until 2003. "Here's the point I tried to make to Wade. I thought we were putting too much faith in Cunningham…. If the company was going to be successful, we had to stop relying on Wade's benefactors in Congress." Another thing bothered Peze. "I know of two instances where I believe hours were billed to the government that weren't being worked," he says, adding that last summer he talked to Pentagon investigators about his concerns.
But Wade was flying high. Indeed, for a man who was usually so secretive, he could be amazingly indiscreet. "Where's your Rolls-Royce?" one employee asked him. "Duke's driving it now—it's parked in the congressional parking lot," Wade answered. Wynkoop recalls Wade telling her he had bought the yacht, the Duke-Stir, which Cunningham was living on. "I was sitting with Mitch in the Capital Grille restaurant when he phones Duke at midnight! Who ever calls a congressman at midnight?" asks Wynkoop. "It was all very bizarre and very surreal."
Another bizarre circumstance: For a modest $140,000, I learn from the Federal Procurement Data System, MZM was hired to provide computer programming for the Executive Office of the President—a remarkable coup for Wade. One month later he paid exactly $140,000 for the Duke-Stir, which was moved to Cunningham's boatslip. "I knew then that somebody was going to go to jail for that," says a party to the sale. "Duke looked at the boat, and Wade bought it—all in one day. Then they got on the boat and floated away."
Cunningham was not shy about detailing his desires. Above the word "Duke" on his congressional stationery he scrawled the number 16, then the letters BT for "boat," then 140. This meant, his friend Wade later acknowledged to prosecutors, that in return for the congressman's use of the $140,000 boat Wade would get a $16 million contract. For another $50,000, Wade would get a $17 million contract—and so on.
After the news story about the sale of his Del Mar house broke, Cunningham tried to get others to cover his tracks. He called Elizabeth Todd, a local real-estate agent, and pressured her to fax him a letter claiming that 2004 was a buyers' market, a request with which Todd only reluctantly complied, since she knew it to be inaccurate. Next, he wrote a letter to Wade in which, after professing amazement at the low resale price of his former home, he offered to pay the $700,000 difference—but never did. Later that same month, he sent a $16,500 check to a dealer from whom Wade had purchased a few Oriental rugs for him. Along with the money came a handwritten note explaining that he had tried to send the dealer the check earlier, but had misaddressed the envelope. Nor was that the end of his machinations. Last July Duke phoned the Maryland antiques dealer he and Wade had patronized at least half a dozen times. Anxiously, he pleaded with her to recall that he had quietly slipped $35,000 in cash to Wade as compensation for the lavish purchases. "I never saw it, and believe me, $35,000 in cash I would remember!" the dealer tells me.
When the distraught Cunningham called her yet again—this time right before Thanksgiving, just days before he tearfully pleaded guilty—to get the dealer to put his Victorian armoire in storage, a store employee put Cunningham on speakerphone. "What's going on? Am I being taped?" the congressman demanded to know. "Has anyone 'visited' the antique store recently?"
They had, indeed. Months earlier, two female F.B.I. agents, flashing badges and demanding furniture receipts, had visited the store—because Wade had been talking to authorities since June 2005.
He had plenty to say. In fact, according to The Wall Street Journal, Wade was also talking to investigators about his mentor, Brent Wilkes. Specifically, he claimed that Wilkes used a limousine service to ferry escorts to and from assignations with Cunningham in rented suites at Washington's Watergate Hotel and Westin Grand. Federal agents are investigating to see if any other lawmakers were involved with the escorts. (Luque responds, "Brent Wilkes never arranged prostitutes for anyone.") But a source who knows the details of the scandal suggests this is too simple an equation. "People are missing the completeness of the corruption: It wasn't 'Get me a hooker and I'll get you a defense contract from the appropriations committee,'" he says. "It's 'I will take care of you and meet your every wish, need, and fantasy, and in exchange you are going to take care of me!' Wilkes tried to corrupt completely—it was a real omertà thing. And when Mitch Wade came in later and had his relationship with Cunningham, that too moved into a broader scheme, but it was driven by Duke, asking for more and more. 'Get me the boat, the antiques—then pay the costs to move those antiques to California!'" ("This is an absolutely false picture of Brent Wilkes," who conducted his business properly, says Luque.)
Among those rumored to have attended poker nights at Wilkes's hospitality suites were C.I.A. director Porter Goss (although a spokeswoman strongly denies Goss ever went) and Wilkes's old high-school football buddy and college roommate, Dusty Foggo, by this time No. 3 at the C.I.A. Goss, who became C.I.A. director in 2004, had promoted him to executive director. Agency personnel were stunned. Foggo was "a very obscure guy," explains a former top operative. As it turned out, Foggo's sudden rise was due in part to Brant Bassett, a C.I.A. case officer known as "Nine Fingers" after he lost a digit in a motorcycle accident. It was Bassett who told Goss that Foggo was "a very capable man who's done tremendous things for the agency."
Why Goss would take personnel tips from Bassett is anybody's guess. "From time to time Bassett ran aground on judgment issues," recalls Milt Bearden, a former C.I.A. station chief. In 1989, Bassett was reprimanded for inappropriately carrying a gun to a meeting. That same year he sent a prank letter to a C.I.A. agent stationed in Vienna whom he'd heard the K.G.B. was trying to blackmail. "So Bassett wrote the poor guy in Vienna a letter as if he were his lover, describing their supposedly delightful sex acts," reports a source. What Bassett didn't expect was that Cuban intelligence would get hold of his bawdy letter, at which point they tried to blackmail him.
Foggo, too, had problems with his C.I.A. bosses. He was reportedly accused of insubordination by a female superior, who retired shortly after his 2004 promotion. In Frankfurt, where he had been chief of the C.I.A.'s logistics office, a $2-to-$3-million agency contract to supply bottled water to agency personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan was awarded to Archer Logistics, which had no experience in such matters, but which happened to be owned by Foggo's old high-school friend Wilkes. (A lawyer for Foggo claims his client had no idea the firm belonged to Wilkes.) Like Congress, the C.I.A. is used to doling out huge sums, often with little or no oversight. "Look, the agency guys live in a culture where there's tons of money and a lot of it is cash," explains one intelligence source, "where you say, How much cash are we giving that guy, that asset, and what suitcase was it in? The American Tourister?"
In early May, when Foggo arrived for work at Langley, he was told to relinquish his security pass. On the seventh floor of the C.I.A. all sorts of agents—C.I.A., F.B.I., Defense Department, and I.R.S.—were looking for evidence of possible bribery and corruption. When Goss was nudged from office that same month, General Michael V. Hayden, who replaced him, announced that "amateur hour" was over at the C.I.A. "The prosecutors are really focused on Foggo in every one of his postings," a source who has been interviewed by federal prosecutors tells me.
The investigation of Duke Cunningham has touched any number of his associates. Representative Jerry Lewis is reportedly under investigation for dealings with his friend Lowery, as well as for what the Copley News Service has referred to as "steering earmarks [money for pet projects] to certain entities," but he hasn't been contacted by prosecutors "about anything," says his spokesman.
Unlike the federal authorities, Tom Casey has had an uneasy feeling about Lewis for a long time, he says. In the spring of 1993, Casey says, he received an 11 p.m. phone call from Lewis, who had an urgent message: he wanted Casey to hire Lowery as a lobbyist—with remuneration "worth a fortune." After leaving Congress, Lowery had joined a Washington lobbying firm, which became Copeland Lowery & Jacquez, and ties between him and the stately Lewis remain warm to this day. In the last six years Lowery's firm and its clients gave more than $450,000 to Lewis.
"Tom, let's cut to the chase. I want you to get stock options for Bill Lowery" was how Lewis opened their conversation, Casey recalls. Specifically, Casey adds, Lewis suggested that a very large number of Audre stock options issued in Canada be given to Lowery, but put under other names. Lewis's actual words were "I am going to give you a list of names," says Casey, who declined to go along. That was the last time he and Lewis had a pleasant conversation, Casey says. (Through a spokesman, Lewis acknowledges that he "thinks he remembers meeting Tom Casey," but denies the story. "What's described sounds illegal to me," says the spokesperson. Through his lawyer, Lowery also denies any knowledge of the proposed deal.)
In May, Casey discussed his allegations about Lewis (among others) with federal prosecutors—as the unhappy congressman now knows. Lewis is sick to death of the scandal that started with Cunningham. Gone is the fabled cooperative spirit of the defense-appropriations subcommittee. "I have never been as angry toward anyone in my entire career," Lewis recently said of Duke.
Cunningham is now separated from his wife, Nancy, who used to tell friends the Duke-Stir made her "seasick." In court papers, she refers to him as "Mr. Cunningham." In February she sued the government in an effort to retain her share of the proceeds from the sale of the $2.6 million Rancho Santa Fe house.
The main assets of Wade's firm were sold last year and renamed Athena Innovative Solutions, which is led by James C. King, a retired army lieutenant general. Blogger Justin Rood has claimed that King, along with his wife, Jeneane, gave on one day—March 23, 2004—a total of four checks of $2,000 each to Katherine Harris's campaign.
Polls show that in her Senate campaign Harris is badly trailing the Democratic incumbent, Bill Nelson. In May, Florida governor Jeb Bush announced, "I just don't believe she can win."
In June it was revealed by The New York Times that Lowery's prosperous lobbying firm, which earned $7.4 million last year, was dissolving in the face of the investigations. Two Democrats seceded to form their own firm; three Republicans, including Lowery, will compose another.
Wilkes, I am told by a source who has talked to investigators, is not cooperating. ("He will not plead guilty, because he is not guilty," says Luque. "But he has offered to cooperate.") Incensed and invigorated, prosecutors are poring over his campaign contributions, and the Pentagon's inspector general is scrutinizing his contracts. "Before, they were willing to ignore a lot of things. Now they are concentrating on Wilkes and Foggo," says the source.
Wade's sentencing has been deferred because, federal prosecutors believe, "his cooperation will continue for quite some time." (Wade's lawyer Howard Shapiro refuses to comment on this story.) There were early reports that Cunningham was acting mulish with Pentagon investigators, but his lawyer says, "My client's fate depends on how well he cooperates."
Eight years ago Cunningham was diagnosed with prostate cancer and two months later underwent a radical prostatectomy, but the cancer has recurred. He will live, doctors at Bethesda Naval Hospital estimate, perhaps seven years. A long jail term "would likely be a death sentence," Cunningham's lawyer informed the court. Currently, he is expected to serve seven years—although his sentence may be further reduced if the government is satisfied with his revelations. He is to be told shortly which federal prison will be his new, and perhaps final, home.
</font>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="14"></hr>