Canada's National Newspaper Calls For Worldwide One Child Policy!

Lamarr

Star
Registered
As a proponent to FREEDOM, if you can afford it, have as many kids as you like! But this is what is coming

http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2314438

The "inconvenient truth" overhanging the UN's Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world.

A planetary law, such as China's one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.

The world's other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity's soaring reproduction rate.

Ironically, China, despite its dirty coal plants, is the world's leader in terms of fashioning policy to combat environmental degradation, thanks to its one-child-only edict.

The intelligence behind this is the following:

-If only one child per female was born as of now, the world's population would drop from its current 6.5 billion to 5.5 billion by 2050, according to a study done for scientific academy Vienna Institute of Demography.

-By 2075, there would be 3.43 billion humans on the planet. This would have immediate positive effects on the world's forests, other species, the oceans, atmospheric quality and living standards.

-Doing nothing, by contrast, will result in an unsustainable population of nine billion by 2050.

Humans are the only rational animals but have yet to prove it. Medical and other scientific advances have benefited by delivering lower infant mortality rates as well as longevity. Both are welcome, but humankind has not yet recalibrated its behavior to account for the fact that the world can only accommodate so many people, especially if billions get indoor plumbing and cars.

The fix is simple. It's dramatic. And yet the world's leaders don't even have this on their agenda in Copenhagen. Instead there will be photo ops, posturing, optics, blah-blah-blah about climate science and climate fraud, announcements of giant wind farms, then cap-and-trade subsidies.

None will work unless a China one-child policy is imposed. Unfortunately, there are powerful opponents. Leaders of the world's big fundamentalist religions preach in favor of procreation and fiercely oppose birth control. And most political leaders in emerging economies perpetuate a disastrous Catch-22: Many children (i. e. sons) stave off hardship in the absence of a social safety net or economic development, which, in turn, prevents protections or development.

China has proven that birth restriction is smart policy. Its middle class grows, all its citizens have housing, health care, education and food, and the one out of five human beings who live there are not overpopulating the planet.

For those who balk at the notion that governments should control family sizes, just wait until the growing human population turns twice as much pastureland into desert as is now the case, or when the Amazon is gone, the elephants disappear for good and wars erupt over water, scarce resources and spatial needs.

The point is that Copenhagen's talking points are beside the point.

The only fix is if all countries drastically reduce their populations, clean up their messes and impose mandatory conservation measures.

dfrancis@nationalpost.com

Read more: http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2314438#ixzz0ZWIJwTSu
 
China Also Wants Population Control Worldwide...

Population control called key to deal
By Li Xing (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-12-10 07:37 Comments(0) PrintMail

COPENHAGEN: Population and climate change are intertwined but the population issue has remained a blind spot when countries discuss ways to mitigate climate change and slow down global warming, according to Zhao Baige, vice-minister of National Population and Family Planning Commission of China (NPFPC) .

"Dealing with climate change is not simply an issue of CO2 emission reduction but a comprehensive challenge involving political, economic, social, cultural and ecological issues, and the population concern fits right into the picture," said Zhao, who is a member of the Chinese government delegation.

Many studies link population growth with emissions and the effect of climate change.

"Calculations of the contribution of population growth to emissions growth globally produce a consistent finding that most of past population growth has been responsible for between 40 per cent and 60 percent of emissions growth," so stated by the 2009 State of World Population, released earlier by the UN Population Fund.

Although China's family planning policy has received criticism over the past three decades, Zhao said that China's population program has made a great historic contribution to the well-being of society.

As a result of the family planning policy, China has seen 400 million fewer births, which has resulted in 18 million fewer tons of CO2 emissions a year, Zhao said.

The UN report projected that if the global population would remain 8 billion by the year 2050 instead of a little more than 9 billion according to medium-growth scenario, "it might result in 1 billion to 2 billion fewer tons of carbon emissions".

Meanwhile, she said studies have also shown that family planning programs are more efficient in helping cut emissions, citing research by Thomas Wire of London School of Economics that states: "Each $7 spent on basic family planning would reduce CO2 emissions by more than one ton" whereas it would cost $13 for reduced deforestation, $24 to use wind technology, $51 for solar power, $93 for introducing hybrid cars and $131 electric vehicles.

She admitted that China's population program is not without consequences, as the country is entering the aging society fast and facing the problem of gender imbalance.

"I'm not saying that what we have done is 100 percent right, but I'm sure we are going in the right direction and now 1.3 billion people have benefited," she said.

She said some 85 percent of the Chinese women in reproductive age use contraceptives, the highest rate in the world. This has been achieved largely through education and improvement of people's lives, she said.

This holistic approach that integrates policy on population and development, a strategy promoting sustainable development of population, resources and environment should serve as a model for integrating population programs into the framework of climate change adaptation, she said.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-12/10/content_9151129.htm
 
I find it ironic whites want to talk about non-whites overpopulating...

when it's the whites consuming all the resources.

If there is a population problem anywhere, it's with the US and Europe.

As a proponent to FREEDOM, if you can afford it, have as many kids as you like!

What else can you say?
 
The government doesn't need to control like China the birth rate, all you need to do is provide free birth control, and the government coming out and stating over-population is a problem. Control population and provide food in countries that are having problems feeding themselves.

Copenhagen is a joke if all they talk about is CO2 reduction by buying some corporation products (electric car, solar panel, biofuels). We will have more problems with biodiversity, water, and food when the world has 12 billion people.
 
Last edited:
This thread is bullshit. Don't pretend Canada is promoting this...it's a damn editorial by some random reporter...not the same as the newspaper or government actually endorsing the idea...
 
I find it ironic whites want to talk about non-whites overpopulating...

when it's the whites consuming all the resources.

If there is a population problem anywhere, it's with the US and Europe.



What else can you say?

when it's the whites consuming all the resources.

As a proponent to FREEDOM, if you can afford it, have as many kids as you like! But this is what is coming

What kind of car do you drive?
 
I find it ironic whites want to talk about non-whites overpopulating...

when it's the whites consuming all the resources.

If there is a population problem anywhere, it's with the US and Europe.



What else can you say?

Co-Sign! These muh fuckas are absolutely sinister with their shit..they would rather depopulate the earth then share its resources.

"How do you deal with the perverted disease bearing voracious bastard who want to eat at every table and from every plate? who wants to rule the world with dying doctrines of "marketplaces" and racist epithets and police it with scum swilling pigs ready to machine gun any who object????"
 
Last edited:
Back
Top