Word. Timing is interesting.
FBI might be trying to save some face for not following up on that tip on Nicholas Cruz.
Regardless this indictment was coming.
4D,
I'm genuinely curious if you're a pro-trump support like a few on the board(Gametheroy, whiteboyblueeyes etc). How do you "rationally" spin this?
I think I might be offended that you even asked me that.
Should I be?
lets see what Trump tweets about this?
4D,
I'm genuinely curious if you're a pro-trump support like a few on the board(Gametheroy, whiteboyblueeyes etc). How do you "rationally" spin this?
No man,
You're a brilliant mind that works often with those that have misconstrued thoughts aka Alternate-Facts about things. Thus, part of your job is to evaluate where the mental clog is and to lead those individuals to the promise land.
I don't have that gift nor do i have the patience for buffoonery.
Thus my question to you is how does a reasonable person look at all that has been reported and concluded "none of it is true" and further, all of it is made up? Hell, I suppose my question could sound like the beginnings of another Flat-Earth spin off thread.
So, when do you guys think they’re going to mention that the Tea Party was co-opted by the same active measures? Maybe that’s why Paul Ryan and Nunes was running around like chickens with their heads cut-off trying to interfere and discredit the Russia probe. Ryan and Nunes are part of the Tea Party wave.
Nailed it.Word. Timing is interesting.
FBI might be trying to save some face for not following up on that tip on Nicholas Cruz.
Regardless this indictment was coming.
Do the live in the US or are they out of reach ?
Let's see if Putin gives them some kind of diplomatic immunity
"Today's indictments were a brilliant first roll-out."Nailed it.
4D,
I'm genuinely curious if you're a pro-trump support like a few on the board(Gametheroy, whiteboyblueeyes etc). How do you "rationally" spin this?
Oh, good. Just had to be clear
Part of the problem is the mythologies we create in our head. For example, like I just did and how easily I could have mistook your post. The reasonable side of me said "ask you" instead of immediately jumping to my own conclusions without the facts. Those that create mythologies can many times be blind to truth. Logic to a specific reason vs general logic. And general logic meaning that I could have jumped to conclusions with your post and formed my own reasoning why you asked me that question even though my assumptions were not factual.
Once those mythologies are created in a person's mind, then you have to battle with ego and pride as they defend their mythology. At that point, your logic and their logic are on two totally different paths.
So in my honest opinion, you're not arguing pro-Trump supporters the way you think you may be. You may just be battle egos and pride in them not wanting to be wrong, which is what I see a lot. You know, the constant deflection is another sign of battle egos.
You and I do not have a problem admitting if we are wrong about something. It doesn't bother me to be wrong or set straight because it's a learning experience in the end. But the ones blind to facts that are right in front of them; you're not arguing about the same thing likely. You're arguing facts and they are defending their mythology.
NothingOk 13 russians indicted. What does this mean?
Oh man....he's gonna have Hulk thumbs this weekend at Mar-a-Lago !!!!!lets see what Trump tweets about this?
lolololol....... I bet you got a Mueller pic in back of your house that you shoot at !!!!Nothing
No
These are the stages of Trumpism:
That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault. <------- (We are right here now)
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did...
You deserved it.
I think our mutual science background helps in being able to admit readily that our thoughts/theory may not be correct. Thus let's test this hypothesis and see what happens. If it's wrong lets see where we went wrong.
So we tend to operate from a mode that this information could not be entirely correct and could led us to the wrong conclusion.
Thus if as a person you don't have some sort of system in place to always "check-you" then it becomes increasingly hard to ID when you could be wrong about something and even harder to admit it. Specifically, because "being wrong" likely is not part of your mode of operation.
Really sad! Because we learn so much from our mistakes that helps us advance our overall progress.
Ok 13 russians indicted. What does this mean?
And if sanctions are forced expect to see the release of the emails from the RNC hacked by Russia. #deliciousI'm wondering the same thing. If they aren't in the US they probably can't touch them. It might make congress force the WH to enforce sanctions tho.
Word. Timing is interesting.
FBI might be trying to save some face for not following up on that tip on Nicholas Cruz.
Regardless this indictment was coming.
Go back a few comments up and read @Spectrum post from Tea Pain. Strategy my friend, strategy.Ok 13 russians indicted. What does this mean?