I still think Airbus will overall win this in the long run
I still think Airbus will overall win this in the long run
It’s too fucking big. It’s like driving a rolls Royce as a public bus. Yesterday, I flew to Cancun in an a330 and that thing was smooth and quiet as hell. Airlines are going for smaller and more efficient aircrafts now.
Airbus will cancel the A380 and they should concentrate on their spectacular A350. That plane is bawse as fuck.
There was a news report yesterday that airbus will stop the A380 if Emirates cancels anymore orders. It’s doomed.Actually the 380 is needed but for the airlines with the dedicated long haul non stop flights like JAL, Ethiad, Emirates,Quantas and South African airways ..
They should only be produced in limited numbers tho because like you said it’s basically a luxury for the airline to have sorta like when Air France and British airways had the concord. IMO they should have never retired keep 2-3 in the fleet where it’s strictly for the business class and wealthy to jet back and forth from UK to NY in 3 hours flat
Also Airbus saying China is interest in multiple 380 orders
Efficiency is the most important factor in modern avaiation. These are not planes for flossing, they are nothing but commercial buses that are expensive to run.They won't. Going cheap is not the way to go in aerospace. Our stock is well over 300/share and I am sitting on 200.
Actually the 380 is needed but for the airlines with the dedicated long haul non stop flights like JAL, Ethiad, Emirates,Quantas and South African airways ..
They should only be produced in limited numbers tho because like you said it’s basically a luxury for the airline to have sorta like when Air France and British airways had the concord. IMO they should have never retired keep 2-3 in the fleet where it’s strictly for the business class and wealthy to jet back and forth from UK to NY in 3 hours flat
Also Airbus saying China is interest in multiple 380 orders
There was a news report yesterday that airbus will stop the A380 if Emirates cancels anymore orders. It’s doomed.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/15/air...a380-if-theres-no-new-deal-with-emirates.html
A350 can do all those long haul routes more efficiently. It has the same cruise range.
I love the a340 as well. I flew Virgin Atlantic a340 to London last May. It was old and still an inefficient 4 engine plane.Personally I like the A340-600 I think once Airbus had that rolling the A380’s days were numbered but damn the A380 is a big mofo and a sight to see when taking off.. shit quiet as fuck
I love the a340 as well. I flew Virgin Atlantic a340 to London last May. It was old and still an inefficient 4 engine plane.
I must say that the take off thrust was awesome. Smooth and powerful. You couldn’t feel shit while taking off.
This.Efficiency is the most important factor in modern avaiation. These are not planes for flossing, they are nothing but commercial buses that are expensive to run.
Damn, which American airline flies A380s for an 8 hour flight ? Unless you’re in the west coast.Used to fly that 380 to France 7 Times a year. Loved that plane. Ride smooth as hell.
Lol. You should sit at LHR and see how these middle eastern airlines are flossing A380s like it’s a rap video.Flown the 380 round trip on Emirates and an Airbus 330 on Swiss Air. Wife also did 380 on Etihad. All were super smooth as hell. As far as economics the non subsidized airlines can't fuck with Etihad and Emirates when it comes to 330's and 380's who are partially government funded. Delta killed the Dubai route from Atlanta. They also complained that it was unfair completion
But the UAE was like "fuck your couch", we running these brand new Airbusses all day every day. That Emirates shit was hot, but my wife said Etihads plane was nicer. Dizamn...
Yeah, the subsidized national carriers were the only ones that were ever going to jump on the A380 bandwagon. While a GREAT aircraft/win for passengers(across all classes including Y), the economics just don’t work for non subsidized airlines(domestic and national).Flown the 380 round trip on Emirates and an Airbus 330 on Swiss Air. Wife also did 380 on Etihad. All were super smooth as hell. As far as economics the non subsidized airlines can't fuck with Etihad and Emirates when it comes to 330's and 380's who are partially government funded. Delta killed the Dubai route from Atlanta. They also complained that it was unfair completion
But the UAE was like "fuck your couch", we running these brand new Airbusses all day every day. That Emirates shit was hot, but my wife said Etihads plane was nicer. Dizamn...
Why did L1011 die an early death while the DC10 flourished for a while thoughYeah, the subsidized national carriers were the only ones that were ever going to jump on the A380 bandwagon. While a GREAT aircraft/win for passengers(across all classes including Y), the economics just don’t work for non subsidized airlines(domestic and national).
Ethiad and Qatar are killing it right now, Emirates revamped and business and first class offerings look good. Not nearly as gaudy and will age much better. Singapore airlines, who already has incredible product, just rolled out a first class suite that will everyone(probably a tie with ethiad) for the time being.
No secret around here that I’m a Boeing man, the A350 is a magnificent aircraft.
Right now for me: 777-300>A350>787
And for the aircraft heads/plane spotters: L1011>MD-11(DC-10)![]()
tri star was a much better plane... but like all things- sometimes its better to be luckyWhy did L1011 die an early death while the DC10 flourished for a while though
I fly mostly in 737s are you guys saying that these jumbo jets are actually smoother even in bad conditions?
The bigger jets are more stable, even in bad weather. Have you ever flown in a smal regional jet or even a private jet? That shit is scary in every way. A big body vessel with a powerful thrust cuts through stuff like butter.I fly mostly in 737s are you guys saying that these jumbo jets are actually smoother even in bad conditions?
tri star was a much better plane... but like all things- sometimes its better to be lucky
Yeah most of my flying is on Regional Jets because I live in a small City. Man you have me wanting to try this Dreamliner and a380 nowThe bigger jets are more stable, even in bad weather. Have you ever flown in a smal regional jet or even a private jet? That shit is scary in every way. A big body vessel with a powerful thrust cuts through stuff like butter.
Nah you don’t even have to go that far, I just flew to Cancun yesterday in Delta’s new a330 and I’m blown away at the smoothness and quietness of the beast. The take off was earily quiet, the cruising manners of the plane was so stable and the landing was so precise, I can’t wait for the flight back this weekend. I love airplanes like I do cars, so I pay attention to stupid shit.lolYeah most of my flying is on Regional Jets because I live in a small City. Man you have me wanting to try this Dreamliner and a380 now
It’s too fucking big. It’s like driving a rolls Royce as a public bus. Yesterday, I flew to Cancun in an a330 and that thing was smooth and quiet as hell. Airlines are going for smaller and more efficient aircrafts now.
Airbus will cancel the A380 and they should concentrate on their spectacular A350. That plane is bawse as fuck.
When I was in Atlanta a few months ago, I talked to a Delta pilot
who was on the way to Brazil. I asked him, jokingly, if he was
flying an A380. He told me that US airlines had stayed away
from the plane because it needed 600 passengers on every flight
to justify the cost, and the business was not there
Yeah, the subsidized national carriers were the only ones that were ever going to jump on the A380 bandwagon. While a GREAT aircraft/win for passengers(across all classes including Y), the economics just don’t work for non subsidized airlines(domestic and national).
Ethiad and Qatar are killing it right now, Emirates revamped and business and first class offerings look good. Not nearly as gaudy and will age much better. Singapore airlines, who already has incredible product, just rolled out a first class suite that will everyone(probably a tie with ethiad) for the time being.
No secret around here that I’m a Boeing man, the A350 is a magnificent aircraft.
Right now for me: 777-300>A350>787
And for the aircraft heads/plane spotters: L1011>MD-11(DC-10)![]()
That is essentially the definition of operating cost. If you can’t fill it up to make it profitable for each trip while you’re operating it, then the operating cost is high. Beside you can’t tell me that four engines are more efficient than two engines that have a higher thrust power. You also can’t tell me that needing more crew and ground crew to operate an a380 vs an a350 or 787 is equally efficient. I could go on.Operating costs for the A380 are not the issue - both Emirates and Lufthansa have gone on the record stating that the costs of the A380 are lower than comparable aircraft such as the 747-8, based on their own experience.
The problem for the A380 is that its size and passenger capacity means that it can only ever be viable on certain routes. That means in turn that you cannot deploy an A380 to cover a breakdown or delay on other routes, in the way that you can with a smaller aircraft.
This is a major issue given that most long-haul airlines now operate very lean fleets: there is already limited ability to cover flight delays or cancellations. It's a pity - the A380 is a great aircraft to fly in.
I did two back to back longhauls last month - one in a an A380, one in a 787, and the A380 was clearly the better of the two in terms of space, vibration and noise. Not that the 787 is terrible, I hasten to add. But the logic of lesser deployability is hard to escape.
Operating costs for the A380 are not the issue - both Emirates and Lufthansa have gone on the record stating that the costs of the A380 are lower than comparable aircraft such as the 747-8, based on their own experience.
The problem for the A380 is that its size and passenger capacity means that it can only ever be viable on certain routes. That means in turn that you cannot deploy an A380 to cover a breakdown or delay on other routes, in the way that you can with a smaller aircraft.
This is a major issue given that most long-haul airlines now operate very lean fleets: there is already limited ability to cover flight delays or cancellations. It's a pity - the A380 is a great aircraft to fly in.
I did two back to back longhauls last month - one in a an A380, one in a 787, and the A380 was clearly the better of the two in terms of space, vibration and noise. Not that the 787 is terrible, I hasten to add. But the logic of lesser deployability is hard to escape.