BGOL Space: Famed Physicist Shuts Down Moon Landing Conspiracy Theorists

And this is how I know you're too far gone. Actual footage of the moon landings being faked, outtakes of the same historical footage you've been shown for 50 years where they are CLEARLY ON A MOVIE SET. And CLEARLY FAKING THE BALL EARTH FROM A HIGH-ALTITUDE FLIGHT but y'all steadily defending the ludicrous idea that men flew to the moon in 1969.

Jeeezus Christ. I'm out, have fun!
I could remake the video you posted -in a weekend - its bullshit without corroboration - has there been a whistle blower? or a witness? a death bed expose??

has it EVER been authenticated???? -a very simple test that you avoid answering

still fruit picking-

btw - is the moon flat too?
 
I could remake the video you posted -in a weekend - its bullshit without corroboration - has there been a whistle blower? or a witness? a death bed expose??

has it EVER been authenticated???? -a very simple test that you avoid answering

still fruit picking-

btw - is the moon flat too?

I'd like to see you try.

Yes. It's been authenticated.

18:40 mark, listen and learn.



And is the moon flat? I don't know, I'm not sure. But imo the explanation of "synchronous rotation" is retarded as fuck.

I'm done bro, not about to spend the weekend arguing about this stupid shit. Ain't nobody been to the goddamn moon. Y'all giving these honkies way too much credit.

Peace.
 
WTF!?!

Oh Hell Naw!!


Where in that video did it say ANYTHING about going through the belts fast?!? U muthafuckas are LYING thru your teeth!!

Fast!?! FAST??? Are you serious?? You're fucking serious???

Give me the exact mark where he mentions going through the belts fast! This is insane!


my apologies Mr. Crazy Motherfucker.

because i'm well read on the subject, i understood and comprehended what i was watching in the video.

because you're a psychotic dingaling dismissing SCIENCE while CLAIMING to KNOW IT...you DIDN'T understand that the video showed the module moving quickly through the belt. this is exactly what they did in the 60's.

because you dont understand that every plane ride you take exposes you to more radiation than you'd get at ground level, you dont get this principle.

you dont understand that an hour at the highest exposure rate of the Van Allen belt would be fatal, but the first Apollo mission astronauts found out that the radiation WAS MUCH LOWER than first anticipated...and survived 4 hours of LOW radiation exposure while traveling at high speeds.

By February of 1964, NASA was confident that Apollo crews would be passing through the belts fast enough that the spacecraft’s skin and all the instrumentation lining the walls would be enough protection.

http://www.popsci.com/blog-network/vintage-space/apollo-rocketed-through-van-allen-belts

theres a whole lot of things YOU DON'T KNOW. because of ignorance you conclude shit that is both illogical and ridiculous.

but you WANT to be illogical and ridiculous...cause crazy ass people like that shit.
 
and ima tell the rest of yall somthing too. when they launched the moon mission, people all over the US watched it fly into space on their home telescopes. they watched it disappear. i lived on a military base during the final mission, and it's all people could talk about FOR YEARS.

yes, people living RIGHT NOW watched the rocket fly into space until it disappeared.

now i KNOW you motherfuckers ARENT saying that nasa DIDNT launch rockets.

we ALL saw that shit live as it happened, and have seen it since.

and i KNOW y'all ARENT saying it flew into space and went SOMEWHERE ELSE, then CAME BACK a week later.
 
1. I have watched both shuttles and rockets takeoff and live with my own eyes as well as on tv.

2. I have watched the shuttle land and have felt the shock wave.

3. I remember setting up my satellite TV 20 years ago. I remember how long it took to find that proper angle in toward the southwest sky to find the signal.

There was a satellite up and out there. Orbits exist. Objects in orbit exist.

Flat Earthers have no science. They can't verify their dome/firament or ice wall or infinite planes but try to use other folks science to undermine other folks science.
 
he DID tell you why...your ass didnt listen.

you just PROVED you dont want to be right, you WANT to be crazy.

abd yes i said CRAZY. anybody who doesnt believe the US went to the moon is fucking CRAZY.[/QUOTE

That dude don't know everything
 
and ima tell the rest of yall somthing too. when they launched the moon mission, people all over the US watched it fly into space on their home telescopes. they watched it disappear. i lived on a military base during the final mission, and it's all people could talk about FOR YEARS.

yes, people living RIGHT NOW watched the rocket fly into space until it disappeared.

now i KNOW you motherfuckers ARENT saying that nasa DIDNT launch rockets.

we ALL saw that shit live as it happened, and have seen it since.

and i KNOW y'all ARENT saying it flew into space and went SOMEWHERE ELSE, then CAME BACK a week later.

Just be because y'all seen them disappear means what...

Not a damn thing

We are shit disappear now
 
Just be because y'all seen them disappear means what...

Not a damn thing

We are shit disappear now
my man...

we saw a space craft disappear into space...and come back.

we saw this with our own eyes.

you cannot say this means nothing, because 1 you didnt see it, and 2 it HAS to mean SOMETHING.

youre arguing right now, and NOT THINKING.
 
my apologies Mr. Crazy Motherfucker.

because i'm well read on the subject, i understood and comprehended what i was watching in the video.

because you're a psychotic dingaling dismissing SCIENCE while CLAIMING to KNOW IT...you DIDN'T understand that the video showed the module moving quickly through the belt. this is exactly what they did in the 60's.

because you dont understand that every plane ride you take exposes you to more radiation than you'd get at ground level, you dont get this principle.

you dont understand that an hour at the highest exposure rate of the Van Allen belt would be fatal, but the first Apollo mission astronauts found out that the radiation WAS MUCH LOWER than first anticipated...and survived 4 hours of LOW radiation exposure while traveling at high speeds.



http://www.popsci.com/blog-network/vintage-space/apollo-rocketed-through-van-allen-belts

theres a whole lot of things YOU DON'T KNOW. because of ignorance you conclude shit that is both illogical and ridiculous.

but you WANT to be illogical and ridiculous...cause crazy ass people like that shit.

:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:

Have a nice weekend.
 
I'd like to see you try.

Yes. It's been authenticated.

18:40 mark, listen and learn.



And is the moon flat? I don't know, I'm not sure. But imo the explanation of "synchronous rotation" is retarded as fuck.

I'm done bro, not about to spend the weekend arguing about this stupid shit. Ain't nobody been to the goddamn moon. Y'all giving these honkies way too much credit.

Peace.

again - NO whistle blower - NO leaker NO witnesses NO documents NO evidence just
hearsay conjecture unsubstantiated fantasies

here is how I knew within 30 seconds of starting at 18:40 mark as you requested - the person talking is just bullshitting and throwing around facts to sound knowledgeable and credible - he didn't study the moon landing at all - 500 degree difference in temperature on the surface means NOTHING- it is only an issue in direct sunlight side of the moon - the moon landing was on the horizon of dark and light sides of the moon - everything else he spoke on was personal conjecture just talking out of his ass

no surprise you have a problem with synchronous rotation- dude, you believe in an ice wall and that the earth sun and moon are in a glass jar
I'm sure if you graduated from high school you got this instead of a diploma
1386-0812-1616-3638.jpg


he doesn't know everything
yeah - he's only studied the subject for decades now and teaches on the subject... :rolleyes2:
 
Last edited:
again - NO whistle blower - NO leaker NO witnesses NO documents NO evidence just
hearsay conjecture unsubstantiated fantasies

here is how I knew within 30 seconds of starting at 18:40 mark as you requested - the person talking is just bullshitting and throwing around facts to sound knowledgeable and credible - he didn't study the moon landing at all - 500 degree difference in temperature on the surface means NOTHING- it is only an issue in direct sunlight side of the moon - the moon landing was on the horizon of dark and light sides of the moon - everything else he spoke on was personal conjecture just talking out of his ass


yeah - he's only studied the subject for decades now and teaches on the subject... :rolleyes2:

:roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:

Y'all are fucking retarded.

Peace fam!
 
Back
Top