AOL PLANNING AN "E-mail Tax"

GET YOU HOT

Superfly Moderator
BGOL Investor
AOL accused of planning ‘two-tier’ internet
Financial Times | February 28 2006
By Chris Nuttall in San Francisco

AOL, the internet service provider, has been accused of planning to introduce an “e-mail tax” that could lead to a two-tiered internet.

An unlikely coalition of civil liberties groups, charities, non-profit organisations, bloggers and gun owners have launched a website, DearAOL.com, to promote a letter-writing campaign against the service. They also threatened a boycott of AOL.

AOL said its Certified Email program was not a tax but an optional, voluntary way for large e-mail senders to pay to deliver authenticated, legitimate mail. It said it intended to launch the service within the next 30 days.

Goodmail, the provider of the new service, said last October that it was entering into a partnership with AOL and its rival Yahoo to offer a service that would send users e-mails they had opted to receive and protect them from spam and fraud.

Companies choosing to use the service would pay AOL and Goodmail an estimated quarter of a cent for every message sent to every e-mail address on their mailing lists.

“It looks like this is pay-to-play or take your chances with the spam filter – this would cost us thousands of dollars a week,” Eli Pariser, executive director of MoveOn.org, a non-profit civil liberties group, told a media conference call.

Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, said “if AOL pulls the trigger on this”, he would advise his members to boycott the service provider.

“Our members are already suspicious of government and corporate meddling in their private affairs; this would probably result in many fewer gun owners being AOL customers.”

Other protesters taking part in the call were the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Free Press, Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist.org, the Association of Cancer Online Resources, DemocracyInAction.org and Tim O’Reilly of O’Reilly Media.

“We spoke to Yahoo! and they seemed much more tentative about this,” said Danny O’Brien of the EFF, explaining the decision to focus the protest on AOL.

“We felt AOL had planted its flag in the ground very clearly and that, if we could show the rest of the industry that what AOL is doing is wrong, we could nip this in the bud.”

AOL said other companies were looking at special handling and delivery of e-mail, including Microsoft and Google. It said the product would be another tier, similar to next-day delivery offered by the post office, that would not hurt the service for other senders.

:angry: THIS SHIT GOT ME HOT
 
Let me direct you to this statement:
AOL said its Certified Email program was not a tax but an optional, voluntary way for large e-mail senders to pay to deliver authenticated, legitimate mail. It said it intended to launch the service within the next 30 days.
IMHO, Bulk emailers SHOULD pay to spam us. Maybe it will keep these free email systems free to the rest of us. Why should they be allowed to saturate free email services with their bullshit ads for shit forcing the providers to build bigger and bigger server farms just to handle their shit for free? Hardware ain't free to the email providers and in my opinion they should pay. The plus side is, if the email they send IS VERIFIED, it would be easier to block it on our end.

-VG
 
I'll second that emotion. Charge em. I have enough difficulty already sending to AOL addressees when I am travelling and logged in to various hotel's wireless service. Email I send from those locations usually is not delivered because, as AOL says, it sees it as spam because of the dynamic IP address suppled by the wireless provider. AOL suggest that the wireless provider provide me with a static IP. So far, in order to prevent mail rejection, I have to constantly go in and change the outgoing mail server to that of the wireless carrier. Pain in the ass. (I'm sure there may be a better way, but IT man, I'm not).

Bottom line, the large volume users should pay, for the reasons VG said and because they may be causing me headaches too. lol

QueEx
 
Back
Top