Amazon Is Working With Police On Facial Recognition Technology That Can Detect Fear Or Aggressivenes
- Thread starter thismybgolname
- Start date
Literally.. Because all this will target and effect is "minorities".
Fail!
White people are the most recessive beings on planet earth!
Instead of just saying we want to try and make things safer by installing and using tax dollars to set up more surveillance cameras, they got to lie and imply things will get safer because we got an app on these cameras
Stupid folks will believe it and you will wait your entire life to see a fucking piece of software stop some physical world violence.
Amazon like
White people are the most recessive beings on planet earth!
Instead of just saying we want to try and make things safer by installing and using tax dollars to set up more surveillance cameras, they got to lie and imply things will get safer because we got an app on these cameras
Stupid folks will believe it and you will wait your entire life to see a fucking piece of software stop some physical world violence.Amazon like
Bezos needs to sit the fuck down
This is silly just like the guy in the video explains.
Seems like China has something like this already.
I don't see it that way, if you have cameras everywhere and that is the status quo evidence of the day, then it makes it harder for race soldiers to simply shut their wearable off and do YOU dirty, because the overlapping surveillance gone show the bullshit.
I think it could be a good thing if you not doing dirt on camera.
Google has a habit of abandoning projects, but when Amazon builds technology, they are usually good about supporting it so guaranteed once its here, its here to stay.
The fear associated with this questions whether the abilities of this technology would be accepted in the future to validate the mistreatment of an individual because of "intent" rather than proven actions. Can a policeman subdue or kill an individual and use the softwaresas validation that the person had an aggressive "intent".
The controversy is whether having your actions read are an invasion of privacy. The way I feel is that no one has a right to the thoughts that I don't publicly display.
This software however, was not created on the basis of law enforcement. This is actually created with retail ad tech in mind for Amazon to sell more stuff. They want to be able to read a persons emotions when served with an ad. If the ad triggers an emotion of curiosity and interest, they will then serve up another ad giving you more information and the opportunity to purchase. That is its true purpose.
Sure it can be used for good... but we all know that it wont be.
The fear associated with this questions whether the abilities of this technology would be accepted in the future to validate the mistreatment of an individual because of "intent" rather than proven actions. Can a policeman subdue or kill an individual and use the softwaresas validation that the person had an aggressive "intent".
The controversy is whether having your actions read are an invasion of privacy. The way I feel is that no one has a right to the thoughts that I don't publicly display.
This software however, was not created on the basis of law enforcement. This is actually created with retail ad tech in mind for Amazon to sell more stuff. They want to be able to read a persons emotions when served with an ad. If the ad triggers an emotion of curiosity and interest, they will then serve up another ad giving you more information and the opportunity to purchase. That is its true purpose.
Sure it can be used for good... but we all know that it wont be.