All signs point to a Google game console announcement at GDC

Database Error

You're right dawg
OG Investor
maxresdefault.jpg


Google hardware

There are two big pieces of evidence that this is a hardware announcement. First, Google is a heavily compartmentalized company, and the person promoting this event on Twitter is none other than Risk Osterloh, Google's senior vice president of Hardware. Osterloh is behind the division that brought us the Pixel phone, Google Home, and every other Google hardware product. His involvement is a solid sign that, yes, new hardware is coming.





The second big piece of evidence is that Google is also hosting a teaser page on store.google.com. The Google Store. The Google Hardware Store. Google could host a teaser page at any of its thousands of sub-domains, but for some mysterious reason, it picked the Google Store. The "Google Store" doesn't sell software—that would be "Google Play." The Google Store only sells hardware—things like smartphones and tablets and laptops and Google Home speakers. Soon, apparently, it will sell video game hardware.

According to a report from The Information (subscription required), Google's gaming hardware was reportedly codenamed "Yeti" and has been in the works at Google for over three years now. We can only guess at what Google gaming hardware might look like. In 2014, the company co-designed the Google Nexus Player with Asus, which was a dead-simple combination of some smartphone parts in a disk-shaped box, a TV remote, and a generic, Xbox-style game controller. That device was primarily an Android TV box, but a game streaming console could look similar to this.

There was also this Google patent of a generic-looking game controller that made the news rounds the other day. The patent involved pushing notifications to the controller, which could be interesting, and the drawings show Android-y hardware buttons—home, menu, and microphone—presumably for Google voice commands. The controller also acted as your authentication token, storing user information like your Google account and settings and using a button combination as a password. This patent was from 2014, though, so it's hard to know if it is at all relevant. Companies patent every single idea they have, and random patents aren't necessarily indicative of future plans.

Another option is just to use the Google Chromecast. The Information's Yeti report noted that "an early version" of Project Stream originally ran on Google's existing streaming stick, just with a controller paired to it. At the time we didn't know of a way to pair a controller to a Chromecast, since the devices didn't support Bluetooth or any other way to hook up a controller. Months later, a third-generation Chromecast started showing up in stores, packing—wouldn't you know it—Bluetooth. As far as we know, there is no official explanation for the new Chromecast's Bluetooth support. So maybe Rick Osterloh will walk up on stage at GDC, hold up a game controller, and say "Anyone that bought a Chromecast in the last six months now owns the Google game console." Mic drop, exit stage right.



Google infrastructure

Numerous companies have tried game streaming in the past, most notably Sony with the PlayStation Now and Nvidia with Geforce Now. Microsoft is jumping into the game with "Project Xcloud," which is powered by literal Xboxes acting as blade servers. Sony and Microsoft both have existing traditional console businesses to safeguard, though, and Nvidia wants to sell graphics cards. Google is the only gaming newcomer that doesn't have an existing business to protect.

While Google isn't a gaming powerhouse, it is an internet infrastructure powerhouse. This could come in handy for a game streaming service that is heavily dependent on network performance and shipping video around the world. Google, of course, runs some of the most popular sites on the Web, including Google.com and YouTube, the latter of which is one of the biggest bandwidth users on the Internet. Google's pioneering data center work is one of the key reasons sites like YouTube can afford to exist. Google has constantly worked to make the Web cheaper, faster, and lower latency, and today the company has a hand in pretty much every aspect of the Internet, from browsers to ISPs to protocols to fiber backbone. If Google really wants to invest in making low-latency game streaming a reality, there is plenty it can bring to the table.



Google... Games?

Having hardware and a streaming platform is nice, but it doesn't matter one bit if you don't have any games to play. A Kotaku report from the middle of last year said Google was pursuing "aggressive recruiting or even major acquisitions" in the games industry to try to build a library for its gaming platform.

There's a good chance former Xbox and PlayStation executive Phil Harrison was involved in those negotiations, as Google hired him at the beginning of 2018. Another big hire was just announced recently: Google snapped up former Ubisoft and EA executive Jade Raymond. Raymond will be VP of an undisclosed division at Google. It sounds like she's not allowed to talk about it right now.

Google's press conference is March 19 at 10am Pacific. There will be a live stream here.

Update: Yeti references in source code
Here's another sign that this is a hardware launch. As pointed out by Tyler Choiniere on Twitter, On the Google Store's teaser page, the background video is titled "yeti-teaser" in the source code.

gpippin.jpg

 
Shit why not.....Atari coming back this year. And google earth has mapped out the entire urban world. They could make for the best GTA open world game ever

That Atari come bcak is not what you think.

I would love to see Sega come back with google...
 
With no 3rd party support it will be dead on arrival

you think so? you dont think google has the money and resources

to pull it off..??

you dont think google has a trick up its sleeve, like going hard with virtual reality gamin or some shit??

I think google has more of a fifty fifty chance of pulling this off...

the only thing is time is NOT on their side.... and they BETTER have some dope games on deck...

their window for success is gonna be small...

microsoft, sony, nintendo too far ahead of the game for bullshittin
 
you think so? you dont think google has the money and resources

to pull it off..??

you dont think google has a trick up its sleeve, like going hard with virtual reality gamin or some shit??

I think google has more of a fifty fifty chance of pulling this off...

the only thing is time is NOT on their side.... and they BETTER have some dope games on deck...

their window for success is gonna be small...

microsoft, sony, nintendo too far ahead of the game for bullshittin
3rd party will only support if the user base is significantly large
 
you think so? you dont think google has the money and resources

to pull it off..??

you dont think google has a trick up its sleeve, like going hard with virtual reality gamin or some shit??

I think google has more of a fifty fifty chance of pulling this off...

the only thing is time is NOT on their side.... and they BETTER have some dope games on deck...

their window for success is gonna be small...

microsoft, sony, nintendo too far ahead of the game for bullshittin


I think Google is smarter than that... I truly believe they are going for some next level waaay out of the box kind of ish.....

Look the competition for "next gen" is just too fierce and cluttered to come in as a rookie especially without big name studios. However, there are few names bigger and more recognizable than Google worldwide. Here are my 2 guesses.


So in theory, I think they could pull off a next great next gen STREAMING system. Ie no discs, all hard drive and basic hardware to stream content and games ( from dedicated servers/systems) No need to worry about graphics cards being outdated at launch and raw processing power ... With what Microsoft hinted at, Google has more than enough resources to make happen... Their servers handle the heavy lifting add in a decent high speed internet connection and a system that holds the data and can stream it in 4K to a TV / monitor.... And it could easily be sub $400 hell maybe even sub $300. They have the $$ to stock pile a library of classics / roms from NeoGeo / Sega...whatever game not locked up as Nintendo / Sony or Microsoft exclusives....


Or what if its not a system in the traditional sense, but a system of peripherals and connections. they could go the route of out doing Nintendo. Imagine the power of Google Earth / Street View enhanced with AR gaming on a portable device that could also be used at home. Maybe they have a Chromcast dock / peripheral to charge and connect your current device to a TV. That Carmen Sandiego game is just a sneak peak. What if you could use your phone /tablet other controller type device out with you in the world... Interact and play anywhere using any landscape? Come back home, sync it with a home base and pick up where you left off? ... There are so many different possible configurations and experiencs Google could go after....


In reality I'm probably waaay off.... But given MS has stated they want to move closer to my first guess and "Maverick," is definitely a step in that direction... And Nintendo has a nice niche with the Switch, there may be room for another unorthodox portable gaming system /experience.
 
Last edited:
Three Big Names to watch out for in the gaming arena are: Google, Amazon and Apple. However, Google looks to be digital/streaming only from what I can see and like the others have mentioned, w/o 3rd party support they all could be DOA.
 
What the hell is this shit...




So they just jumped into Cloud based gaming...

I do not like this..... shit at all.

Browser based streaming is the worst shit to happen to gaming... You are basically paying for games that you don't own.
 
What the hell is this shit...




So they just jumped into Cloud based gaming...

I do not like this..... shit at all.

Browser based streaming is the worst shit to happen to gaming... You are basically paying for games that you don't own.


That was part of the big uproar when MS was first leaked concepts of the One console, they talked about not having a disk drive and all the games would just be saved to the hard drive......

Well that would've killed a big part of the secondhand (ie game stop / game exchange / red box) market.

Here too, how can you sell a game you buy that turns out to be trash? How can players get access to a vast supply of "used" or discounted games in a streaming only environment?

Now if they say new games will be 30-50% cheaper since there are no discs.... That could be appealing.

The wifi connection for the controller is pretty cool... That means the controller connects to the same server your game is on and should significantly reduce if not eliminate possible latency with going through your system / set up first.

Ummm.... Interesting
 
That was part of the big uproar when MS was first leaked concepts of the One console, they talked about not having a disk drive and all the games would just be saved to the hard drive......

Well that would've killed a big part of the secondhand (ie game stop / game exchange / red box) market.

Here too, how can you sell a game you buy that turns out to be trash? How can players get access to a vast supply of "used" or discounted games in a streaming only environment?

Now if they say new games will be 30-50% cheaper since there are no discs.... That could be appealing.

The wifi connection for the controller is pretty cool... That means the controller connects to the same server your game is on and should significantly reduce if not eliminate possible latency with going through your system / set up first.

Ummm.... Interesting


I agree with all of this...

Most importantly...

Data Caps.... !!!!

In todays age of data caps... A person can't afford to have a Streaming only console.. Especially one that streams 4k or 8K...

A cord cutter that uses Comcast internet would be reaching their cap the first two weeks of the month.
 
What the hell is this shit...




So they just jumped into Cloud based gaming...

I do not like this..... shit at all.

Browser based streaming is the worst shit to happen to gaming... You are basically paying for games that you don't own.


Owning, or buying, games is over, subscription models are the future. Gaming will probably be better for it.
 
Back
Top