Ain't no way you telling me that senior SCOTUS COON Clarence Thomas ain't on the take- GORSUCH GOT THAT STINK ON HIM TOO ,Neil Gorsuch property deal

lightbright

Master Pussy Poster
BGOL Investor
'Ethics be damned': Legal experts aghast over bombshell report on Clarence Thomas’ luxury lifestyle

CLARENCE.jpg


In the wake of the latest bombshell report revealing incriminating details about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' luxurious lifestyle, legal experts are weighing in with critical remarks and concerns as calls for accountability increase.

According to the new report:

"For more than two decades, Thomas has accepted luxury trips virtually every year from the Dallas businessman without disclosing them, documents and interviews show. A public servant who has a salary of $285,000, he has vacationed on [Harlan] Crow’s superyacht around the globe. He flies on Crow’s Bombardier Global 5000 jet. He has gone with Crow to the Bohemian Grove, the exclusive California all-male retreat, and to Crow’s sprawling ranch in East Texas. And Thomas typically spends about a week every summer at Crow’s private resort in the Adirondacks."

The report also emphasized: “The extent and frequency of Crow’s apparent gifts to Thomas have no known precedent in the modern history of the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Now, legal experts have taken to Twitter with ethical concerns as they've pointed out the many issues with Thomas' conflicts of interest.

"There’s been a lot of talk by MAGA Republicans this week about the judge in NYC," former Trump administration official Olivia Troye tweeted. "If you want to talk about a judge & their family let’s talk about Justice Clarence Thomas & his wife Ginni…"

"Our country is poisoned from within," tweeted former Rep. Denver Riggleman (R-Va.). "Ethics be damned. And with his wife, Ginni, being a major GOP influencer with multiple organizations that funnel and accept money in GOP circles—and certified Q quack—Clarence Thomas should not be allowed anywhere near a judicial decision.…"

Calls have also increased for Thomas to be impeached from the Supreme Court or held accountable amid reports on the latest findings.

"Google 'Clarence Thomas RV' and you'll find endless puff pieces about him and Ginni being ascetics who spend their free time with the common folk," Max Kennerly tweeted. "Turns out their vacations were really on private planes and superyachts — trips they concealed in violation of federal law."

"What is the penalty for violating the disclosure law? Would the DOJ need to first file a criminal complaint?" Chief financial correspondent Felix Salmon also asked.

According to a new report from The Washington Post, Supreme Court disclosures will likely hold justices accountable going forward.

"Supreme Court justices and all federal judges must provide a fuller public accounting of free trips, meals and other gifts they accept from corporations or other organizations, according to revised regulations quietly adopted this month," the report notes.

The latest controversy follows Thomas' own remarks insisting that the Supreme Court was being "bullied" following the overturn of Roe v. Wade. At the time, Thomas also raised concerns about Americans disrespecting the government, a remark Truthout's Sharon Zhang described as a form of "glaring hypocrisy" given the Supreme Court justice's reputation.

The judicial system “can’t be an institution that can be bullied into giving you just the outcomes you want,” Thomas said, implying that the opposing views toward institutions “bode ill for a free society.” Per the report, Thomas also said, "Young people are especially guilty of disrespecting government institutions like courts."

Pushing back against the remarks, Zhang wrote:

Thomas’s comments sparked ire among abortion rights supporters, who pointed out the glaring hypocrisy of telling people to simply live with decisions made by 9 unelected judges with lifetime appointments who are not subject to any oversight. As political commentators pointed out, Republican attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election are a prime example of people not being able to live with an outcome they don’t like — but Thomas has yet to condemn the anti-democratic campaign and coup attempt, perhaps because of his wife Ginni Thomas’s involvement in those events.



'Ethics be damned': Legal experts aghast over bombshell report on Clarence Thomas’ luxury lifestyle - Alternet.org
 
Last edited:
'Ethics be damned': Legal experts aghast over bombshell report on Clarence Thomas’ luxury lifestyle

image.jpg


In the wake of the latest bombshell report revealing incriminating details about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' luxurious lifestyle, legal experts are weighing in with critical remarks and concerns as calls for accountability increase.

According to the new report:

"For more than two decades, Thomas has accepted luxury trips virtually every year from the Dallas businessman without disclosing them, documents and interviews show. A public servant who has a salary of $285,000, he has vacationed on [Harlan] Crow’s superyacht around the globe. He flies on Crow’s Bombardier Global 5000 jet. He has gone with Crow to the Bohemian Grove, the exclusive California all-male retreat, and to Crow’s sprawling ranch in East Texas. And Thomas typically spends about a week every summer at Crow’s private resort in the Adirondacks."

The report also emphasized: “The extent and frequency of Crow’s apparent gifts to Thomas have no known precedent in the modern history of the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Now, legal experts have taken to Twitter with ethical concerns as they've pointed out the many issues with Thomas' conflicts of interest.

"There’s been a lot of talk by MAGA Republicans this week about the judge in NYC," former Trump administration official Olivia Troye tweeted. "If you want to talk about a judge & their family let’s talk about Justice Clarence Thomas & his wife Ginni…"

"Our country is poisoned from within," tweeted former Rep. Denver Riggleman (R-Va.). "Ethics be damned. And with his wife, Ginni, being a major GOP influencer with multiple organizations that funnel and accept money in GOP circles—and certified Q quack—Clarence Thomas should not be allowed anywhere near a judicial decision.…"

Calls have also increased for Thomas to be impeached from the Supreme Court or held accountable amid reports on the latest findings.

"Google 'Clarence Thomas RV' and you'll find endless puff pieces about him and Ginni being ascetics who spend their free time with the common folk," Max Kennerly tweeted. "Turns out their vacations were really on private planes and superyachts — trips they concealed in violation of federal law."

"What is the penalty for violating the disclosure law? Would the DOJ need to first file a criminal complaint?" Chief financial correspondent Felix Salmon also asked.

According to a new report from The Washington Post, Supreme Court disclosures will likely hold justices accountable going forward.

"Supreme Court justices and all federal judges must provide a fuller public accounting of free trips, meals and other gifts they accept from corporations or other organizations, according to revised regulations quietly adopted this month," the report notes.

The latest controversy follows Thomas' own remarks insisting that the Supreme Court was being "bullied" following the overturn of Roe v. Wade. At the time, Thomas also raised concerns about Americans disrespecting the government, a remark Truthout's Sharon Zhang described as a form of "glaring hypocrisy" given the Supreme Court justice's reputation.

The judicial system “can’t be an institution that can be bullied into giving you just the outcomes you want,” Thomas said, implying that the opposing views toward institutions “bode ill for a free society.” Per the report, Thomas also said, "Young people are especially guilty of disrespecting government institutions like courts."

Pushing back against the remarks, Zhang wrote:

Thomas’s comments sparked ire among abortion rights supporters, who pointed out the glaring hypocrisy of telling people to simply live with decisions made by 9 unelected judges with lifetime appointments who are not subject to any oversight. As political commentators pointed out, Republican attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election are a prime example of people not being able to live with an outcome they don’t like — but Thomas has yet to condemn the anti-democratic campaign and coup attempt, perhaps because of his wife Ginni Thomas’s involvement in those events.



'Ethics be damned': Legal experts aghast over bombshell report on Clarence Thomas’ luxury lifestyle - Alternet.org
Why are you asking other men to lick your balls faggott. Explain yourself
 
Why are you asking other men to lick your balls faggott. Explain yourself
Why are you in here licking them, instead of the balls on your flat assed box shouldered wife? I bet that right this moment, ur trying to get a "pool boi" job at that all male retreat
sidebar: that finger length thing she got down there isn't a clit.... FYI
:idea:
.
 
Last edited:
The Supreme Court’s Ginni Thomas problem is bigger than legal ethics

Unaccountable donors are mainstreaming her favorite conspiracy theories, which demonize fellow Americans.

By Sarah Posner
March 31, 2023, 5:55 PM EDT


A new investigation by The Washington Post reports nearly $600,000 in anonymous donations to Crowdsourcers for Culture and Liberty, a right-wing activist organization led by Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. The money was channeled through the Capital Research Center, a conservative think tank. According to the Post, "the arrangement, known as a 'fiscal sponsorship,' effectively shielded from public view details about Crowdsourcers’ activities and spending, information it would have had to disclose publicly if it operated as a separate nonprofit organization, experts said."

It’s just the latest instance of the Thomases’ conduct creating questions about conflicts of interest. But the problem runs deeper, mainstreaming Ginni Thomas’ favorite conspiracy theories that demonize fellow Americans, with no accountability as to the sources of her funding.

No Supreme Court rules exist to address the problem posed by the funding of Crowdsourcers — or any other larger ethics problem posed by Ginni Thomas’ activism. (A lawyer for Ginni Thomas told the Post that "she has complied with all reporting and disclosure requirements.") Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics expert at New York University, told the Post there is no rule for when “one half of a married couple is at the ramparts on political issues that then get translated into legal issues that her husband has to decide.” The high court has recently come under increased pressure to adopt stronger ethics mandates, especially after the leak of a draft ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the court’s failed attempt to identify the leaker and allegations that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito leaked the outcome of a 2014 case. And while Supreme Court justices are expected to recuse themselves for financial conflicts of interest or for the appearance of partiality in a case, that’s an expectation, not a requirement, and no entity exists to enforce either.

This is not Ginni Thomas’ first time in the spotlight for the conflicts her activism poses for her husband’s appearance of impartiality, and therefore for the public’s confidence in the integrity of the court. In early 2020, she was part of an informal network of far-right activists who pressured Trump to purge administration officials perceived to be “disloyal” to him and replace them with their handpicked list. Just a few months later, Trump appointed Thomas to a five-year term on the Library of Congress Trust Fund Board, which oversees the investment policy of the library’s $200 million trust.

In the wake of Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential victory, she pressured state legislators to overturn the election results, while exhorting White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to do the same. “Help This Great President stand firm, Mark!!!...You are the leader, with him, who is standing for America’s constitutional governance at the precipice. The majority knows Biden and the Left is attempting the greatest Heist of our History,” she wrote. She shared false election conspiracies with Meadows, predicting that Trump’s campaign lawyer Sidney Powell and “improved coordination now will help the cavalry come and Fraud exposed and America saved.”

“It’s extraordinary,” CBS News’ Robert Costa, a veteran political reporter, told NPR at the time. “This is a pipeline between the spouse of a Supreme Court justice, the judicial branch and the chief of staff at the White House.” Thomas later told the Jan. 6 committee that while she regretted the texts, she still believed the election had been stolen.

When a justice’s spouse is as deeply enmeshed not only in the ideology but the entire political apparatus of one side, it is difficult to believe the Thomases’ claims that they keep their professional lives firewalled at home. But whether they do or not discuss work over dinner is only part of the problem. After all, it’s no secret that Justice Thomas is in ideological lockstep with the right flank of the conservative movement.

The other problem is that a justice’s spouse, at the heart of the conservative legal world, not only holds but has worked assiduously to promote extreme anti-democratic views based on conspiracy theories. Ginni Thomas nurtures the falsehood that the left is destroying America. If financial conflicts of interest create the “appearance of impropriety,” what is the “appearance” when a justice’s wife texts a top government official, as Thomas did with Meadows, that she hopes far-right conspiracies that the “Biden crime family” and others will be imminently arrested for sedition and tried by military tribunals are true?

Her political activism is rooted in her belief that more than half of America is out to destroy American exceptionalism. She is nonetheless a sought-after person in a tightly knit, interlocking conservative movement that not only wants to influence the outcome of cases before the high court, but also seeks to change politics and culture through their anonymously financed efforts, like Crowdsourcers.

In just one example of how interconnected these actors are, in late 2019 Thomas hosted a luncheon at the Trump International Hotel at which she gave out awards to conservatives she said were “the most courageous culture warriors we could identify, doing authentic work on behalf of timeless truths.” Among the awardees was Meadows, who at the time was still a member of Congress. Thomas praised his work, including that he had “built a very critical relationship with President Trump that continues to yield benefits to all of our ideas and principles.” In January 2022, the Supreme Court denied Trump’s quest to block the release of White House records to the Jan. 6 committee. Justice Thomas was the only dissenter from the decision.

“Not everybody sees it,” Thomas told the audience in a ballroom of a hotel owned by the president of the United States, “but our liberties and constitutional governance that embodies our government by the people, designed to most ably protect and promote human flourishing, is threatened by radical ideologues on the left.” Dangerously, such spectacles lend a certain legitimacy to her activities and her views. After all, if the wife of such a prominent official believes these conspiracy theories, can they be that fringe? And given her standing in the conservative movement, is she fringe?

The reported donation to Crowdsourcers is a drop in the bucket of right-wing influence on the courts. A far-right movement, awash in vast amounts of anonymous donations, has fulfilled its publicly stated wish to control the judiciary. Its handpicked jurists are just beginning to carry out its publicly stated mission of rolling back Americans’ rights they insist are the product of liberal excesses. The deeper and more vexing obstacle is that the bucket is so immense and so zealously guarded by the GOP that, short of impeaching Thomas, would-be reformers face a daunting, multifaceted task in combating one of the most entrenched and perilous threats to our democracy — a profoundly corrupted court of last resort.

gettyimages-646233370_custom-26d1c037d08acdf5d33a640eae0d167076b894af-s1100-c50.jpg
 
This fool never should have been put on the court in the first place.

He filled the seat Justice Thurgood Marshall had and has done everything he can to be the complete opposite of Marshall.
I'd expect nothing less from a "black man" appointed to the Supreme Court by George Bush. Smart move by Bush though to replace a black man with another black man. Clarence's fucked up ideology was an afterthought cause of the optics.
And you are right that he should have never been put on the court
 

I been searching for that video clip of him in that biopic he made (Clarence Thomas, Created Equal) where he says "I'm of normal stock and I prefer being around that.", likes the simple things, likes to ride around in a motorhome and park in Walmart parking lots..... :hmm:
EDIT:

Joy shows video of Clarence Thomas bragging he loves traveling to RV Parks — after funded yacht trip







.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top