60 Black Democrats Opposing Cornel West and Bernie Sanders’ Platform Amendments

JimJones

Rising Star
Registered
In a letter to the Democratic National Committee, 60 African-American Democratic politicians outlined their support for the 2012 Democratic Party platform language on the Middle East and Israel. The group of black leaders was organized by former South Carolina State Representative and CNN commentator, Bakari Sellers. In the letter, Sellers stated:

I believe that the Mideast planks of the previous platform were carefully crafted and have served us well as a party and a country. As Democrats…we would be well served to stick closely to our previous platform language and ensure that any changes…do nothing to undermine the principles that have given such strength and clarity to our previous platforms.

Sellers said the purpose of the letter was to express support for the 2012 language in the Democratic Platform. He and the 60 signatories, like the members of the committee that represented Hillary Clinton, oppose using “occupation” to describe the Israeli settlements and opposed the removal of the affirmation that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.

Sellers also directly addressed the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement:

…Anti-Semitism has been on the rise and it has taken a new form — the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement known as BDS. The BDS movement is an effort to bypass direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians and, instead, use economic and political pressure to force unilateral Israeli action on issues that must be resolved through talks.

Sellers’ position on BDS stands in stark contrast to the position forwarded by Platform Committee member, Professor Cornell West, during the committee meeting hearings:

We’re at a turning point now, and of course it’s going to be a slow one in the Democratic Party, but some of us will be working outside the Democratic Party to make it quicker. And that’s why I support the BDS (Boycott, Divest, Sanction).

Cornel West made an impassioned plea for the Palestinian people that has since gone viral across multiple platforms. West stated:

“Palestinians…wrestling with occupation for 50-some years–demeaned, devalued, dominated and exploited. For too long, the Democratic Party’s been beholden to AIPAC–that didn’t take seriously the humanity of the Palestinian brothers and sisters.


According to CNN, the letter sent by Bakari Sellers was in response to the traction that Professor West’s viewpoint might have gained “in the public narrative.”

Additional questions have arisen to the motivation and purpose of the letter from Sellers. One of the most ardent voices opposing Sellers’ letter is Rania Khalek of Electronic Intifada. In an interview with the Progressive Army, Khalek stated that Sellers’ letter was an attempt to undercut Cornel West’s testimony at the hearings–undermining the grassroots movement that is, for the first time, gaining ground in solidarity with Palestinians.

In an article on Electronic Intifada, Khalek stated:

West’s and Zogby’s advocacy for Palestinian rights has been so insistent that the Clinton wing of the party has attempted to neutralize them through the most cynical form of identity politicking.

Clearly, there is no single, monolithic position that can be attributed to the Black community on the issue of Israel and Palestine. As far as opinions from the Black community, they clearly can range from Sellers to West.

The full letter from 60 Black Democrats can be found HERE.
 
image.png
 
Anti-Semitism has been on the rise and it has taken a new form — the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement known as BDS. The BDS movement is an effort to bypass direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians and, instead, use economic and political pressure to force unilateral Israeli action on issues that must be resolved through talks.

foh... tap dancing for euro jews :smh:

Bakari Sellers
bakari_sellers.jpg
 
:dunno:They were voted in by bus loads of these chics. As long as they're the only group of black people voting in mass then this is what we can expect.


maxresdefault.jpg
 
But but but you all are not understanding .

I will wait until Easy B, Watcher and Big tex tell us why this was a great letter and supporting the better friends of Israel is the best platform.

I mean really , how can you use words like occupation to describe occupation ?

Why don't you see that Israel is only defending itself and has the right and are entitled to whatever land they want.

Fukkn Palestinians acting like the damn savages the PC police want to call native Americans.
 
But but but you all are not understanding .

I will wait until Easy B, Watcher and Big tex tell us why this was a great letter and supporting the better friends of Israel is the best platform.

I mean really , how can you use words like occupation to describe occupation ?

Why don't you see that Israel is only defending itself and has the right and are entitled to whatever land they want.

Fukkn Palestinians acting like the damn savages the PC police want to call native Americans.


The only thing i have an issue with is trying to change the super delegates and open primaries.
 
But but but you all are not understanding .

I will wait until Easy B, Watcher and Big tex tell us why this was a great letter and supporting the better friends of Israel is the best platform.

I mean really , how can you use words like occupation to describe occupation ?

Why don't you see that Israel is only defending itself and has the right and are entitled to whatever land they want.

Fukkn Palestinians acting like the damn savages the PC police want to call native Americans.
I didn't give one fuck about Israel until this guy started shitting on Obama.

29prexy_web1-master768.jpg


Fuck em
 
Glad to see nobody defending this bullshit...

I think the 60 tokens who signed this letter have revealed themselves as people who will use blackness to benefit those to whom they are beholden. They should not be trusted or supported.
 
I didn't give one fuck about Israel until this guy started shitting on Obama.

29prexy_web1-master768.jpg


Fuck em


Damn shame your only reason is because he shit on Obama.

Apathy is a very bad thing to possess especially when it only changes when it affects your loved one
 
Glad to see nobody defending this bullshit...

I think the 60 tokens who signed this letter have revealed themselves as people who will use blackness to benefit those to whom they are beholden. They should not be trusted or supported.

Sure does.
 
The only thing i have an issue with is trying to change the super delegates and open primaries.

Super delegates should be done away with because the system was created to protect the status quo from the voters.

You can't claim you are interested in increasing voting if you purposely lock out a large segment of voters. Doesn't matter if you do it with laws or do it with rules.

Each general election all you hear is how important independent voters will be and how they have to be courted.

Well then court them during the primaries too. Can't be unimportant during primaries and then be important for the election if you really care about serving the people.

Trying to change it during was stupid and not going to work...But they should be changed before the next elections.

Even sports leagues change rules after their seasons.
 
I've been saying this for awhile....


Any black person,who supports Israel is a coon.They treat African Jews the same way America treats us in this country.

And to think that wasn't an issue but when they said something about Obama ,all of a sudden they are a problem.
 
The mutha fucking DNC as a whole is some republican light type shit... (we) gone learn one day. ..
This is why I no longer consider myself a dem and will not settle for another pragmatist or centrist like Hillary or most other dems. And the Israel dick riding I just cant take it anymore from either party.
 
Last edited:
Super delegates should be done away with because the system was created to protect the status quo from the voters.

You can't claim you are interested in increasing voting if you purposely lock out a large segment of voters. Doesn't matter if you do it with laws or do it with rules.

Each general election all you hear is how important independent voters will be and how they have to be courted.

Well then court them during the primaries too. Can't be unimportant during primaries and then be important for the election if you really care about serving the people.

Trying to change it during was stupid and not going to work...But they should be changed before the next elections.

Even sports leagues change rules after their seasons.

SD's are there to stop someone crazy from getting the nod ie a trump....primaries should remain closed due to republican shenanigans
 
SD's are there to stop someone crazy from getting the nod ie a trump....primaries should remain closed due to republican shenanigans

you can try to narrow it down all you want.

if the voters vote for someone crazy then they get who they choose.

what qualifies these unelected appointees of the status quo to decide ?

the second point is an excuse....the republicans have many open primaries and how many of those have democrat shenanigans affected their races ?

and as far as that goes.

if the republicans wanted to do that they could register as democrats for the primary and still vote republican in the general.

So no shenanigans are stopped ....it's all bullshit for control and donation hunting.
 
you can try to narrow it down all you want.

if the voters vote for someone crazy then they get who they choose.

what qualifies these unelected appointees of the status quo to decide ?

the second point is an excuse....the republicans have many open primaries and how many of those have democrat shenanigans affected their races ?

and as far as that goes.

if the republicans wanted to do that they could register as democrats for the primary and still vote republican in the general.

So no shenanigans are stopped ....it's all bullshit for control and donation hunting.

NO they don't
 
This is why I no longer consider myself a dem and will not settle for another pragmatist or centrist like Hillary or most other dems.
Welcome home my man...

300 posts in 9 years...you was on lock, right? What you was in for?

Or did you too heed the call of the agents? It's funny how these random ass names pop up every election cycle...
 
Sure they did....Are you not familiar with the Party of Lincoln strategy and App that Karen Hunter put out this year ?
On that point I can't go no further with you with this subject "Party of Lincoln" bullshit is a show stopper
 
The irony of people in this very thread saying "fuck the jews" when they have been following and defending a jew for an entire year, turning on their own people for a jew.

is that the best you can do ?

really ?

damn shame for such a grammatically correct individual such as yourself.

Fuck Israel isn't synonymous with fuck all jews.

BTW

Sanders is a non-practicing jew who is harder on Israel than the candidate you have been defending..The better friend to Israel
 
Fuck the Jews and the Palestinians.

As you said when I pointed out Bernard was shipping nuclear waste to poor Latino communities in Texas. Not my concern, I give zero fucks.

Such an enlightened person and you have so many issues with misquotes.

Maybe it isn't intentional and you just have comprehension issues.

Good thing your sentence construction is always on point.
 
Welcome home my man...

300 posts in 9 years...you was on lock, right? What you was in for?

Or did you too heed the call of the agents? It's funny how these random ass names pop up every election cycle...
Lol nah I am a long time lurker. I started posting a few months ago.
 
Such an enlightened person and you have so many issues with misquotes.

Maybe it isn't intentional and you just have comprehension issues.

Good thing your sentence construction is always on point.

Here is your exact quote:


would I want it in my backyard ? No but then I never moved to where a dump is....I also don't move near electric substations...

The people who live in places like that, that is there interest and they should vote their interest.

Soo....

Why not have the same attitude towards Palestinians?

Your sensibilities damned sure weren't as offended by that as they are in this case. In fact, the Dem platform is basically saying the same thing you did... "We don't want to be occupied, so we don't move into occupied zones. The people who live in places like that, that is there interest and they should vote their interest."
 
Back
Top