300,000 Vets Have Mental Problems, 320,000 Had Brain Injuries

GreedySmurf

Star
Registered
The idea of over 300,000 military trained individuals walking around with brain damage is frightening as hell! This is one more issue that should have been brought up in the debate.

300,000 Vets Have Mental Problems, 320,000 Had Brain Injuries
By Pauline Jelinek
The Associated Press Thursday 17 April 2008

Washington - Some 300,000 U.S. troops are suffering from major depression or post traumatic stress from serving in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and 320,000 received brain injuries, a new study estimates.

Only about half have sought treatment, said the study released Thursday by the RAND Corporation.

"There is a major health crisis facing those men and women who have served our nation in Iraq and Afghanistan," said Terri Tanielian, the project's co-leader and a researcher at the nonprofit RAND.

"Unless they receive appropriate and effective care for these mental health conditions, there will be long-term consequences for them and for the nation," she said in an interview with The Associated Press.

The 500-page study is the first large-scale, private assessment of its kind - including a survey of 1,965 service members across the country, from all branches of the armed forces and including those still in the military as well veterans who have left the services.

Its results appear consistent with a number of mental health reports from within the government, though the Defense Department has not released the number of people it has diagnosed or who are being treated for mental problems. The Department of Veterans Affairs said this month that its records show about 120,000 who served in the two wars and are no longer in the military have been diagnosed with mental health problems. Of the 120,000, approximately 60,000 are suffering from PTSD, the VA said.

Veterans Affairs is responsible for care of service members after they have left the service, while the Defense Department covers active duty and reservist needs. The lack of information from the Pentagon was one motivation for the RAND study, Tanielian said.

The most prominent and detailed military study on mental health that is released is the Army's survey of soldiers at the warfront. Officials said last month that it's most recent one, done last fall, found 18.2 percent of soldiers suffered a mental health problem such as depression, anxiety or acute stress in 2007 compared with 20.5 percent the previous year.

The Rand study, completed in January, put the percentage of PTSD and depression at 18.5 percent, calculating that approximately 300,000 current and former service members were suffering from those problems at the time of its survey, which was completed in January.

The figure is based on Pentagon data showing over 1.6 million military personnel have deployed to the conflicts since the war in Afghanistan began in late 2001.

RAND researchers also found:
  • About 19 percent - or some 320,000 services members - reported that they experienced a possible traumatic brain injury while deployed. In wars where blasts from roadside bombs are prevalent, the injuries can range from mild concussions to severe head wounds.
  • About 7 percent reported both a probable brain injury and current PTSD or major depression.
  • Only 43 percent reported ever being evaluated by a physician for their head injuries.
  • Only 53 percent of service members with PTSD or depression sought help over the past year.
  • They gave various reasons for not getting help, including that they worried about the side effects of medication; believe family and friends could help them with the problem, or that they feared seeking care might damage their careers.
  • Rates of PTSD and major depression were highest among women and reservists.
The report is titled "Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, and Services to Assist Recovery." It was sponsored by a grant from the California Community Foundation and done by 25 researchers from RAND Health and the RAND National Security Research Division, which also has done does work under contracts with the Pentagon and other defense agencies as well as allied foreign governments and foundations.


http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jR80fyXWKdH2cTZVmwWBL45MVpbQD903M76O0
 
This is the part of bush's war that we will be paying for generations to come. Some of these folks will end up needing permanent care and many will end up in the legal system. If that what bush was looking for, well mission accomplished.

-VG
 
I am in the mental health industry and the current mental health system is in no way prepared to deal with this. If you guys think the health care system in America is screwed up the mental health care system is even worse. You combine that with the red tape involved in diagnosis and treatment of active military or discharged vets and the problem increases exponentially.

The quick answer on what happens if these individuals are not effectivelly treated is simple incresed levels of homelessness, domestic violence, substance abuse and a myriad of other problems that end up impacting social resources across the board. If individuals are not treated by the mental health system they end up in hospitals being ineffectively treated on an emergency basis. Here in N.C. we have scene this as a major problem and but have yet to address it adequately.

But in chaos there is opportunity. So I will be developing the model program to deal with this issue. Wish me luck.
 
who the fuck cares, nobody told them to enlist in the fucking military.........fuckin' dumbasses

You should care since your tax dollars are going to treat them. Since your children have to go to school with their children. Since your property values will go down because of increased homelessness. 600,000 vets equals 2.4 million family members affected by PTSD or TBI.
 
who the fuck cares, nobody told them to enlist in the fucking military.........fuckin' dumbasses
I the fuck care and thank them for their service. You're right, nobody told them to enlist, they volunteered to serve, though they didn't necessarily choose the conflict or agree with the politics of the conflict. In fact, many oppose the conflict, yet, faithfully perform their duties. You don't have to support the war in any form or fashion to respect those who respond to the call. If you can't respect those who have been injured or who have given their lives, even though you may oppose the conflict, in toto, it would be hard for me to see how you should in any way share in any benefit of being here.

QueEx

P.S. Read the rules BEFORE you respond.
 
You should care since your tax dollars are going to treat them. Since your children have to go to school with their children. Since your property values will go down because of increased homelessness. 600,000 vets equals 2.4 million family members affected by PTSD or TBI.

:hmm: . . . care about those who become injured only because of the impact on how tax dollars may be spent, where their children may go to school and because property values may go down because they might become homeless.

In many ways, you sound here like the republicans you've described and claim to despise.

QueEx
 
Thats normal! This what being in a war does to a person! The shit one goes through, the shit thats scene on the battle field as well as the emotional roller coaster ride...of course soldiers are going to be fucked up. Thats what war does to a soldier. Thought yall knew that!
 
:hmm: . . . care about those who become injured only because of the impact on how tax dollars may be spent, where their children may go to school and because property values may go down because they might become homeless.

In many ways, you sound here like the republicans you've described and claim to despise.

QueEx

LOL Where did you see ONLY. Just giving those without sympathy a personal reason to give a damn.

If I wanted to sound like a republican I would say fuck em let them pay for their own health insurance. But since my business is social service I say pay me for the problems America created in it's quest for global freedom lol. I will gladly clean up the cost of freedom to provide me and my people some economic freedom.

And not to get it twisted. I have the utmost respect for all human life and dignity not just those lives that have a direct affect on me. I am in the business of caring for people that is a business you cannot do without love.
 
Sometimes, people don't realize the MAGNITUDE, of statistical numbers, site, how emersed, one is, in reality...:smh:
 
What do they expect on mental issues. They are not using hunting rifles, doing hunting rifle damage to human bodies.

The long term cost, and impact to families . . . that's 600,000 some FAMILIES impacted, mentally, financially, etc.
 
I the fuck care and thank them for their service. You're right, nobody told them to enlist, they volunteered to serve, though they didn't necessarily choose the conflict or agree with the politics of the conflict. In fact, many oppose the conflict, yet, faithfully perform their duties. You don't have to support the war in any form or fashion to respect those who respond to the call. If you can't respect those who have been injured or who have given their lives, even though you may oppose the conflict, in toto, it would be hard for me to see how you should in any way share in any benefit of being here.

QueEx

P.S. Read the rules BEFORE you respond.

:rolleyes:
 
In these vet's lives, there will a day, when they want to die. A promise unfufilled, a mission accomplished, a fallen soldier, a relationship gone awray. Enter chaos 600,000 times, any day, any moment, ANYTIME. The vets need recognition, attention and treatment...
 
Back
Top