2012 Presidential Debates

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator

The Commission on Presidential Debates has announced the 2012 general election debate formats.

There will be four debates - three (3) presidential and one (1) vice presidential; all debates will air from 9 to 10:30 p.m. ET and feature a single moderator. The moderators will be announced next month.

The debate schedule:


  • Wednesday, October 3, 2012 - The first presidential debate, which will be held on October 3 at the University of Denver in Colorado, will focus on domestic policy and be divided into 15-minute topic segments.


  • Thursday, October 11, 2012 - The sole vice presidential debate, which will be held at Centre College in Danville, Kentucky, will feature questions on both domestic and foreign policy and be divided into 10 minute segments.


  • Tuesday, October 16, 2012 - The second presidential debate, which will be held at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, will use a town-hall format where undecided voters will ask the candidates questions on domestic and foreign issues.

  • Monday, October 22, 2012 - The third presidential debate, which will be held at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida, will focus on foreign policy and be divided into 15-minute topic segments.



http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/25/cnns-gut-check-for-july-25-2012/?hpt=hp_bn3
 

Romney facing critical moment at debate



lQDNd.WiPh2.91.jpg

Mitt Romney on the campaign trail | Carl Juste/Miami Herald/MCT


McClatchy Newspapers
By Lesley Clark
and David Lightman
September 28, 2012


WASHINGTON — With his fortunes in several battleground states fading, Mitt Romney will step onto the stage Wednesday night to debate President Barack Obama in what could be one of his last opportunities to change the dynamics of the 2012 election.

The debate in Denver will be the first of three between the two men and could be decisive, particularly for Romney, who has Republicans worried that his campaign is faltering.

"If he doesn’t get on board soon, there’s trouble out there,” said David Woodard, a South Carolina-based Republican consultant. The stakes for Romney, he said, “keep going up with each passing day."

The debate comes as the Romney campaign desperately tries to reverse weeks of bad headlines and gloomy poll numbers. Obama has built a national lead and a growing edge in key swing states, notably crucial Florida, Ohio and Virginia.

“Romney’s trailing in the critical battleground states and this is about the last opportunity for a challenger to level the playing field and pick up a bit of momentum,” said Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist Institute for
Public Opinion.


Do Debates Matter?

Debates do matter: 67 percent of those who voted in 2008 said the debates were helpful in deciding between the candidates, according to the Pew Research Center. But this year’s electorate is unusually polarized, and Miringoff said there appear to be fewer undecided and “persuadables” left to convince at this stage of the election.

“Debates have tended to be reinforcing,” he said. “If you like what the Republicans say you’re going to like what Romney says, and if you like the Democrats you’ll like Obama.”

The race is far from out of reach, of course. Republicans still see hope. The economy, though rebounding slightly, remains sluggish. Unemployment is still over 8 percent, and the Arab world is newly turbulent.

But time is running out for Romney.

"He has to shape the race in the final 40-plus days,” said Craig Robinson, editor of The Iowa Republican newsletter and the former executive director of the Iowa Republican Party. “He needs to focus on showing the differences between himself and the president, and these debates allow him to go on offense.”


Pivotal Debates

Though analysts say debates are rarely game changers, they can elevate a challenger, simply by appearing on the same stage as the incumbent. White House insiders say the first debate is Romney’s best opportunity, because it will be the first time he appears before the nation on an equal footing with the president.

A few of the presidential face-offs have proved pivotal, including

  • the 1960 matchup in which a telegenic John F. Kennedy bested an ailing Richard Nixon and won the White House.

  • In 1980, the debate was held a week before the election, and voters saw and liked an upbeat Ronald Reagan and turned against a gloomy Jimmy Carter. Reagan surged and won the election.

Romney has dismissed talk that his campaign needs a major reset and says it’s picking up steam.​

“People acknowledge the last couple of weeks have been challenging,” said campaign adviser Brian Jones. “At the same time, the campaign is getting back into a rhythm, back on track.”

The 90-minute debate at the University of Denver, starting at 9 p.m. EDT, will focus on domestic issues. Jim Lehrer, the host of PBS’s “NewsHour,” will moderate.

A second debate on Oct. 16 in New York will use a town-hall style and will feature questions on foreign and domestic policy from the audience. The participants will be undecided voters selected by the Gallup Organization. The third debate on Oct. 22 in Florida will cover foreign policy.

The two vice presidential candidates – Vice President Joe Biden and Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the Republican nominee – will debate in Kentucky on Oct. 11.

This year’s debates begin after some battleground states already have started voting. Early voting began in Iowa on Thursday, absentee voting is underway in Virginia and Ohio voters can begin voting on Oct. 2.

Debates are often judged as much on style as substance, and both campaigns are seeking to temper expectations, falling over each other to paint their candidate as a rusty orator and their opponent as a polished debater. Both sides are working hard to lower expectations for their own candidate.

Romney “has been preparing earlier and with more focus than any presidential candidate in modern history,” said Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki. She contends Obama will have time to “review and practice” before the debates, but that between “world events, governing” and campaigning, he has had less prep time than the campaign anticipated.

Yet Obama has clearly practiced, slipping off to Democratic National Committee headquarters in Washington to engage with Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, a veteran presidential debater who is standing in for Romney. Obama will spend three days next week in Nevada, campaigning and preparing for the debate.

The Romney campaign, in turn, casts the candidate as unaccustomed to one-on-one contests and note that he’s not debated a Democrat since 2002. By most accounts, he turned in a forceful performance then against Democratic gubernatorial candidate Shannon O’Brien, going on to defeat her to become governor of Massachusetts.

In a memo, Romney senior adviser Beth Myers suggests Romney will be up against “one of the most talented political communicators in modern history.”

The bar is likely higher for Obama. A Suffolk University/NBC12 poll in Virginia – which showed the president with a slim lead over Romney – found that 46 percent of respondents said Obama is the better debater. Just 19 percent selected Romney.

“Barack Obama comes into the debate phase of the election with very high expectations, which may be difficult to meet or exceed,” said poll director David Paleologos. “A credible performance by Romney could shake up the presidential race in Virginia and elsewhere.”​



Email: lclark@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter:@lesleyclark
Email: dlightman@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter:@lightmandavid


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/09/28/170052/romney-facing-critical-moment.html#storylink=cpy



 
18rBG5.Sm.91.jpg



<IFRAME SRC="http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2012/09/28/18/12/18rBG5.La.91.jpg" WIDTH=760 HEIGHT=500>
<A HREF="http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2012/09/28/18/12/18rBG5.La.91.jpg">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
<IFRAME SRC="http://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/elections/" WIDTH=767 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/elections/">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
This will come down to two things: how Obama handles Romney's willingness to lie and stand by the lie and how the media covers those same lies. This is the same press that acted like Bush beat Gore in their debates and that Palin "tied" with Biden.
 
There is a saying in the law, especially with respect to crimes involving theft or the wrongful taking or receiving or holding of the property of another (I'm sure you've heard in stated, one way or another):
"Possession is 9/10ths of the law" - - that is, having possession of the thing is a conviction about wrapped up. LOL​

I agree with your comments above. Said differently though:
"Perception is 9/10ths of the law."



 
These debates are giant wastes of time. There's only three as if all the important things pertaining to a nation this powerful can be wrapped up in three debates. They generally have about 90 seconds to answer, which can only lead to non-substantive answers. They have no enforcement mechanism to make the candidates answer the questions asked and instead they just answer the question they want.

There should be at least five debates, probably more, and the media shouldn't be moderators. It should be moderated by experts in the fields being discussed. And the idiot voters should not be allowed to ask question. If you do, then all they will bring up is gay marriage and abortions.
 
I even forgot to mention the obvious that the "debate" will exclude the Green and Libertarian candidates.
 
You think that Ron Paul sitting at home watching TV wouldn't have an affect upon Romney or Obama ???
 
Well, with that specific example, no since Ron Paul already dislikes both and hasn't even endorsed Romney for show.

But why does it matter regarding who it hurts to have more information about the different choices for President? Wouldn't it be better for the country?
 
<iframe width="853" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tXZNFTVzD_w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The Presidential Debates are a mechanism for corporations to further control the political process. The Commission of Presidential Debates is financed by corporations. They exclude other political parties and steer voters towards these two corporate controlled political parties.
 
Romney isn't doing BADLY which hurts the President more than anything. He hasn't presented one policy and just spews generalities while bashing Obama. Idiots watching this who don't know any better will swoon.
 
This is the reason why this system is bullshit. They cut the topics and time per topic so the debate can end on time. For what, so the media has time to spin the debate for their guy before the local news. Cutting short a presidential debate for that bullshit reason is outrageous.
 



:lol::lol::lol:

This will come down to two things: how Obama handles Romney's willingness to lie and stand by the lie and how the media covers those same lies. This is the same press that acted like Bush beat Gore in their debates and that Palin "tied" with Biden.

On that point, the President didn't do very well. Mitt not only stood by his old lies, he told some brand new ones. The dude actually stood there and decided to reverse his course on live tv from what he's been saying for over a year, particularly on taxes.

Since he didn't implode and POTUS was rather uninspired, Romney can be said to have won but it may well be a pyrrhic victory as now Team Obama has footage of him AGAIN switching positions on his own policy proposals.

So that's what Romney's debate prep was: over talk and argue with the moderator to force the debate in his direction because he knows Lehrer won't want to fight him. It worked. Lehrer was even more underwhelming than the Prez.

I called Mitt "Kerry 2.0" and he continues down that path. Kerry beat Bush pretty handily in their first debate.
So I expect Biden to be especially vicious next week on Ryan.

I don't see myself venturing to the main to discuss this because that group has a history of overreacting and I don't want blood from their heads exploding to get on my monitor.
 
Chris Matthews On Presidential Debate: "Where Was Obama Tonight?"

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.liveleak.com/ll_embed?f=dd2ee842333a" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
:(:(
 

Michael Moore digs out an old RepubliKlan nostrum from the 1980's which explicitly explains why RMoney at the first debate, looked directly into the camera and as loudly as he could talk without screaming lied & lied & lied & lied about what a Rmoney administration would do.<blockquote><span style="background-color:yellow">"You can say anything you want during a debate and 80 million people hear it,'observed Peter Teeley, press secretary to Vice President Bush. If reporters then document that a candidate spoke untruthfully, 'so what? Maybe 200 people read it or 2,000 or 20,000."</SPAN>

– New York Times, November 1, 1984

</blockquote>

How many times do these people have telegraph exactly what they're doing before people pay attention?

They admit they don't really care about deficits, that supply side economics is a fraud, that they create their own reality, fact-checking is for suckers and on and on. And yet everyone keeps acting as if they are serious people with sincere intentions.

Republicans admit to being liars in order to get elected all the time. Why doesn't anyone believe them?

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/archive/must-read/2012/10






mitt-jerk_n.jpg


<img src="http://forwardlatino.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/eisenhower.jpg" width="700">
 
Back
Top