2 Multinationals Pull Out of Iran- Stop Selling Gasoline to Iran- Attack Imminent

Makkonnen

The Quizatz Haderach
BGOL Investor
Whatever the shelf life of Iran's fuel reserves are add a week or two to that and you have your Israeli/American/Coalition attack time frame.



---------------
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/11/world/middleeast/11iran.html?pagewanted=print
March 10, 2010
2 Multinationals Pull Back From Iran
By RON NIXON

Royal Dutch Shell and Ingersoll-Rand this week became the latest major corporations to announce they would cease or cut back business operations in Iran.

The announcements came as the United States and its European allies stepped up their efforts to win a tough new round of United Nations sanctions aimed at pressing Iran to rein in its nuclear program.

Over the weekend, The New York Times reported that over the past 10 years, the federal government gave more than $107 billion in contract payments, grants and other benefits to foreign and multinational American companies while they were doing business in Iran. Among them were Shell and Ingersoll-Rand.

On Wednesday, Shell announced that it had stopped selling gasoline to Iran, which despite its vast petroleum reserves has antiquated refineries that leave it dependent on gasoline imports. Shell said it had not supplied gasoline since last year.

“We have stopped all sales of gasoline to Iran,” said David Williams, a Shell spokesman at corporate headquarters in The Hague.

The decision, however, does not apply to Shell’s other business interests in Iran.

Royal Dutch Shell signed an $800 million deal in 1999 to develop two huge oil fields. The project was completed in 2005, but Shell continues to receive payments as a result of its work.

Shell has a Iranian natural gas development project in the works, but it is awaiting the results of a feasibility study before determining whether to proceed with it, Mr. Williams said.

Ingersoll-Rand P.L.C., a multinational company that makes air compressors and cooling systems, said Monday that it would no longer allow its foreign subsidiaries to sell parts or products to Iran. The company announced its decision in a letter to United Against Nuclear Iran, a group based in New York that lobbies against companies that do business with Iran. The group was also instrumental in trying to get Shell to withdraw.

A spokesman for Ingersoll-Rand, Paul Dickard, said in an interview on Wednesday: “We’ve been looking at the development for some time, and when we saw a number of companies make this decision, our withdrawal became imminent. Unless there is a regime change, we are completely out of Iran.”

The Times reported that more than two-thirds of the $107.8 billion in government benefits went to companies doing business in Iran’s energy industry, a huge source of revenue for the Iranian government and a stronghold of the increasingly powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, a primary focus of the Obama administration’s proposed sanctions because it oversees Iran’s nuclear and missile programs.

Several companies have recently decided to pull out of Iran because of pressure from the United States and its allies, shareholder divestment campaigns and the difficulty of doing business with Iran’s government.

Several other companies, including Vitol Holding B. V.; Trafigura; and Glencore International AG, commodities traders based in Switzerland, recently announced that they had stopped gasoline sales to Iran.
 
yeaaaaaaahhhhh it's about that time. dude was runnin off at the mouth a couple weeks back about 911 bein done by the govt. u can say that on a messageboard but not in front of the UN.
 
yeaaaaaaahhhhh it's about that time. dude was runnin off at the mouth a couple weeks back about 911 bein done by the govt. u can say that on a messageboard but not in front of the UN.


I thinks he works for Israel


:cool:
 
They're going to wait for Iran to make the first move to justify an attack. This will not end well.

:smh::smh::smh::smh:
 
I can't see an attack happening, over half the Iranian population is under the age of 35 and many of them have no problem with the west or just neutral or apathetic. It's the old heads fuckin up their country and restricting their freedom and they know it, they don't blame the west for that. But those young people who want reform would unite in hatred and turn against the west if we bombed their country. We would lose years of strategic momentum in a single day.

I don't know how you get out of this situation though. If AJ gets the nuke I think they would use one or two because God told them to kill Jews and infidels. The radioactive fallout would be messy because the winds and dust will cross international borders at medium to low dosage and then when people get sick comes the blame game and retaliation. It's a fucked up situation.
 
Does this mean war :cool:
To me..............

okay multinationals never pull all the way out of a rogue state - ford and ibm stayed in nazi germany
why stop gasoline shipments? only thing I can think of is that it hurts Iran's ability to move ground troops after their supplies diminish and cranks up the pressure on Iran
Why would multinationals apply pressure to their business partner Iran?

I think Israel gonna do something on their own and the US will be like "chill man damn yall outta control over there"
 
I can't see an attack happening, over half the Iranian population is under the age of 35 and many of them have no problem with the west or just neutral or apathetic. It's the old heads fuckin up their country and restricting their freedom and they know it, they don't blame the west for that. But those young people who want reform would unite in hatred and turn against the west if we bombed their country. We would lose years of strategic momentum in a single day.

I don't know how you get out of this situation though. If AJ gets the nuke I think they would use one or two because God told them to kill Jews and infidels. The radioactive fallout would be messy because the winds and dust will cross international borders at medium to low dosage and then when people get sick comes the blame game and retaliation. It's a fucked up situation.


1. No one in the West who matters gives a shit about the young people in Iran since they are powerless. They only care about them in regard to their ability to cause problems for the Ayatollah and the Republican Guard.

2. AJ is powerless. He has no real power. The Ayatollah and a few councils run shit but I've read that since the RG put it down during the uprisings their power has increased. The Republican Guard who AJ is down with runs him not vice versa. They dont want Nukes to use, they want them as a threat to be left alone by the US.

Nukes are a deterrent not for usage. Iran is surrounded by enemies. Remember they are non-arab Shiites with a significant Kurd and Arab population and no die hard allies.
Talk is one thing but the region is already fucked up I dont think Israel and the US will risk letting Iran have nukes without tryin something.
 
Well, people tried to warn them....

Looks like all the countries starting with the letter "I" are getting sorted out by the US, Israel, Iraq, Iran. Italy better be behaving themselves real good right about now, ain't nobody forget their little scism teaming up with Germany until 1945
 
Its going to be a tough sell for this nation. americans backed themselves into a corner. And ironically if iran was to have nuclear technology companies like shell will damn near be useless. This thread is a shit thread btw
Obama better not get us involved in this shit.
 
Obama better not get us involved in this shit.

It's not his call to get the US involved,he just signs the go ahead papers..i thought you knew that?Even if he wanted to stop it he can't do shit,can you say puppet on a string!!!! :yes:
 
Its going to be a tough sell for this nation. americans backed themselves into a corner. And ironically if iran was to have nuclear technology companies like shell will damn near be useless. This thread is a shit thread btw

^^^^^ that was a shit reply

How will companies like Shell, who they rely on for gasoline because they don't have enough refineries, be insignificant if they have nuclear power plants?
Are all their cars going to magically use nuclear waste as fuel?
Are all their vehicles going to magically become electric?
Are the nuclear plants going to build oil refineries?

Americans dont have to do shit- this aint Iraq and Europe is scared of Iran with nukes. Israel can do it all and take the heat. They will catch hell anyway and most of the sunni middle east wont really care much even though they will complain.
 
The radioactive fallout would be messy because the winds and dust will cross international borders at medium to low dosage and then when people get sick comes the blame game and retaliation. It's a fucked up situation.



I posted commentary about THIS very thing last year . . . The ENTIRE nuke deal and Iran is a FARCE. What I mean is, for the very reason you state, there would NEVER be a nuclear attack by Iran . . . UNLESS Isreal launched 1st.


Let me explain. If you look at the geographic landscape of the those middle eastern countries engaged in militaristic and/or political conflict, you'll see that there are NO wins for Israel.

Israel is SMALL and is couched/nested amongst these Arab states; Syria, Lebanon, and . . . IRAN.

A nuclear strike against Israel is a practically a nuclear strike against all neighboring Arab states. These Arab states would NOT want to be subject to this type of warfare (esp. as collateral damage). So launching against Israel is a HIGHLY unlikely scenario. Think about it, would you ALLOW a neighbor from just OPPOSITE side of the street from you to launch a rocket at your NEXT DOOR neighbors crib . . . even if you weren't invloved? I think not. Same applies here.

And given the DISPROPORTIONATE size difference between Israel and Iran, should the unthinkable happen, Israel would be no more, but Iran would survive.


This is a sham. This whole ordeal, IMHO, is about maintaining the balance of power in favor of western powers. Simple.

The ILL SHIT is IF this happens, Pres. Obama would be guilty of the SAME war crimes as Bush 43 by continuing the Bush doctrine of preemptive war.

Why/How?

• Because Iran has NOT been proven by the IAEA to have a 'WEAPONS' program
• Also, Iran is NOT apart of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Which, btw, neither is Israel.

And don't sleep, an attack on Iran will force the hand of Syria and Lebanon. This will not end well at all. . . for ANYONE. In the end, the U.S. may accomplish it's aims. But the cost would NOT be worth it . . . to us as U.S. citizens.

JG
 
Last edited:
That piece of shit Israel is a fucking annoyance. :smh: :smh: Remind me again why they are such a great ally?

:lol: @ Iran with all that liquid crack having to import gas and having bullshit refineries. :smh: You would have thought after the American fuckery in Afghanistan and Iraq they would have stepped up their self-reliance game.
 
Isnt Iran supported my Russia and China?
not any more
i dont know what happened but they all got on board with western europe - i think western europe is scared some muslims got shit that can kill them that they cant do shit about



meanwhile pakistan just tested some ballistic missiles
 
Back
Top