Dude what part of "an 11 year old can't consent" do you not understand. The youngest age of consent in the U.S. is 16 and she is 5 years under that...what they did was child rape.
Thats why its called STATUTORY RAPE
Dude what part of "an 11 year old can't consent" do you not understand. The youngest age of consent in the U.S. is 16 and she is 5 years under that...what they did was child rape.
The 11 yr doesnt have a right to consent.
We know its normal for 11-15yrs to have sex with each but thats not the point.
But the 14 yr doesnt even fall under the Romeo and Juliet laws. Hes more than 2 yrs older than ol girl.
The shouldnt let her off scott-free . She need to be on probation or have some counseling.
An 11 year old's brain is not anywhere close to being fully developed.
you can say the same for Rossini
For you slow ones this is what I believe happened.
Statutory rape is a term used in some legal jurisdictions to describe sexual activities where one participant is below the age required to legally consent to the behavior.
hmmmmm...well that throws a wrench in it.....the girl's lawyer would have to prove that they all KNEW she was under 17...Texas § 22. 011
Sexual assault for anyone to intentionally or knowingly penetrate a person under age 17, other than his spouse. The actor has an affirmative defense if he is not more than three years older than the victim, who is at least age 14
Under Texas law even the 14 year old could get stroked cause the girl isn't even at the minimum age for the three year rule to apply.
he's a fucking retard. how many times are yall going to try to explain it?![]()
Rossini a pedo..
now I'm not so sure. based on the law the poster above posted, if the boys/men did not know she was under 17 or if it is proven that she gave false information, I see this going 2 ways based on what's in the video:How the hell you get a group of guys hanging together ages ranging from 14 to 27 involved in a rape?
As for the rape it doesn't matter how fast the girl is, she's only 11 that's all that matters, she's illegal in any state. Anyone who engages in a sexual act with a child under that states "age of consent" is guilty of rape.
How the hell you get a group of guys hanging together ages ranging from 14 to 27 involved in a rape?
.
How the hell you get a group of guys hanging together ages ranging from 14 to 27 involved in a rape?
As for the rape it doesn't matter how fast the girl is, she's only 11 that's all that matters, she's illegal in any state. Anyone who engages in a sexual act with a child under that states "age of consent" is guilty of rape.
now I'm not so sure. based on the law the poster above posted, if the boys/men did not know she was under 17, I see this going 2 ways based on what's in the video:
(1) If the tape shows the girl "consenting": their lawyers may be able to bargain to have them charged with a lesser nonfelonious crime.
(2) if the tape shows them threatening her or forcing her and she is struggling: they will be charged with felony rape (where it doesn't matter what her age is/was)
that is strange. but something else is bugging me the more i think about this case. what is the likelihood that 20+ male pedophile rapists, teens and boys, would a) all know each other and b) willingly run through an 11-year-old KNOWING she was 11?
before y'all start, i'm not defending these animals for shit. like i said in the other post, they shouldn't just skate on statutory rape even if she did consent....because she can't really consent and taking advantage of a girl that young is just as bad as a violent rape. but that doesn't mean she didn't lie about her age to one or more of them. a young girl lying about her age is rarely a sucessful defense against rape charges, though, nor should it be.
I know--that's why the video is so important. If it shows that they forced her, then it won't even matter what her age was. If it shows her willingly participating with boys/men who thought she was 17 because of what she told them, it may be a tough case. If any of the participants went to school with her at any point it's a wrap because they definitely knew her age....it's confusing the way the law is written and then how much do we expect men to do to verify a woman's age? Ask to see a license or birth certificate?that is strange. but something else is bugging me the more i think about this case. what is the likelihood that 20+ male pedophile rapists, teens and boys, would a) all know each other and b) willingly run through an 11-year-old KNOWING she was 11?
before y'all start, i'm not defending these animals for shit. like i said in the other post, they shouldn't just skate on statutory rape even if she did consent....because she can't really consent and taking advantage of a girl that young is just as bad as a violent rape. but that doesn't mean she didn't lie about her age to one or more of them. a young girl lying about her age is rarely a sucessful defense against rape charges, though, nor should it be.
true!!!I have have seen an 11 year-old girl look mature enough to mistake for anything other than a underage female.
I would need to see the girl, but I hate to say it...
...but twenty dudes having sex with the same female, at the same time, suggests these brothers judgment is very questionable.
So, in other words, Lawrence Taylor will read this and wish he lived in Texas.
Thats what I been sayin throughout the whole thread but im the retardI know--that's why the video is so important. If it shows that they forced her, then it won't even matter what her age was. If it shows her willingly participating with boys/men who thought she was 17 because of what she told them, it may be a tough case. If any of the participants went to school with her at any point it's a wrap because they definitely knew her age....it's confusing the way the law is written and then how much do we expect men to do to verify a woman's age? Ask to see a license or birth certificate?
From the way things sound it seemed like she lied to them about her age, mo black who is from around there already said the girl dont look or act like shes 11.
hmmmmm...well that throws a wrench in it.....the girl's lawyer would have to prove that they all KNEW she was under 17...
And LMAO @ "other than his spouse". #1. marrying a teenager in TX. #2. why is the term "he" used, as if a woman can not sexually assault a boy????![]()
You don't seem to understand. Everyone of those guys is black. Plus they all ratted on each other. She probably don't know how many guys it was. Between those who gave up names and the DNA that will be analyzed it will be enough to convict most of them. Do you really think the judge will rule in their favor? Those guys are going to prison.
Whatever this girl was about won't mean shit in that courtroom. 16 guys against 1 girl of 11 is all that jury and judge is going to see.
I understand that, but if somehow they can get her to admit that she was a willing participant and they didnt know her age then some of them may get off.
the girl aint gonna have a lawyer, it's the state of texas vs all them niggas. Brother lsiten i work with this shit everyday. Even if she said she was 28 it dont matter they still broke the law. Now in all my 28 years i have never seen a 11 year old that didnt look 11. And to rossonli nigga u just sick it dont matter if u knew or not you cant tell me out of all them niggas no one saw that she was under 17. In a town were the population of 8000 you mean to tell me no one knew ? come on son and here a link to the charge that most of them will probably pled down too http://law.onecle.com/texas/penal/21.11.00.html like i said i work with this shit everyday and this case came to my office but they took it away and moved it to a program director to work because the national media got ahold to it and i can tell you its alot more shit to it then yall see or will know p.s. the harriet tubman looking bitch it related to one of the niggas that got charged. And we know family's of people who get charged never think they people did wrong
That's what I'm saying, in a town that small most people know everybody and on top of that they said most of the boys arrested
went to the same high school so how would they think she was their age but not in their school.
homie what u not understanding, is that even is she lied the law in texas and most other states does not mean you can get off.
She's a child and someone has to pay for that,alone.
But we can't look over the fact that some of the suspects had been having sex with her during a three months span.
Does rape accure during a three month span?
She's a child and someone has to pay for that,alone.
But we can't look over the fact that some of the suspects had been having sex with her during a three months span.
Does rape accure during a three month span?
That's what I'm saying, in a town that small most people know everybody and on top of that they said most of the boys arrested
went to the same high school so how would they think she was their age but not in their school.