Man if it's Rock vs. Cena and Sting vs. Taker at Wrestlemania in the Georgia Dome, I'mma go to WWE headquarters and slap the shit outta somebody.
 
Sting vs. Taker, Rock vs. Cena, the only other match that would be dope for me is if Shawn came back to fight John Morrison. The angle being everyone saying John is the new Shawn Michaels. I pretty sure they fought before, but I think they could have a really good match.:dance:

Michaels/ Morrison match won't happen and wouldn't really make much sense. Michaels is truly done anyway. If Cena faces The Rock and Cena wins...I'd be PISSED!!!
 
im gonna start watchin the shit again

i say the re-run of raw today and ive been cutting people of saying it dosnt matter what your name is for the rest of the evening

this shit was really good back in the day
 
Michaels/ Morrison match won't happen and wouldn't really make much sense. Michaels is truly done anyway. If Cena faces The Rock and Cena wins...I'd be PISSED!!!

While I don't see the match happening, that's the only outcome that makes sense. Of course since Lawrence Taylor beat Bam Bam Bigelow and Floyd Mayweather beat The Big Show, Rock could beat Cena at Mania. He shouldn't but he could.

But if he does, nobody (at least not people that think that's a good idea) should ever give TNA shit for putting over new, former WWE talent over their homegrown talent.
 
Rock could beat Cena at Mania. He shouldn't but he could.

But if he does, nobody (at least not people that think that's a good idea) should ever give TNA shit for putting over new, former WWE talent over their homegrown talent.

Not sure i agree with this at all, if rock fought cena then rock should win, simply because cena has been forced down our throat as being as big as rock/austin. I feel cena has never lived up to the hype and him beating rock would be the most contrived as everything else involving him.

The tna argument could still be made since rock beating cena is nothing like jeff hardy beating aj styles. Both rock/cena are homegrown so idt this applies to tna's crapfest at all.
 
Not sure i agree with this at all, if rock fought cena then rock should win, simply because cena has been forced down our throat as being as big as rock/austin. I feel cena has never lived up to the hype and him beating rock would be the most contrived as everything else involving him.


I'm always against outside celebrities (and that's what Dwayne Johnson is at this point) going over in house, full time wrestlers. Cena has been crammed down our throats, absolutely and him losing to Rock doesn't hurt him at all especially if the match is any good but it just shouldn't happen.
Even making the match would be a mistake. Miz has worked extremely hard and has earned a main event payday at Mania, even if it's just to job to Cena.

The tna argument could still be made since rock beating cena is nothing like jeff hardy beating aj styles. Both rock/cena are homegrown so idt this applies to tna's crapfest at all.

The argument can still be made because it's valid, it just can't be made by people okay with non-wrestlers beating wrestlers. TNA looks foolish having guys walk in and beat their guys but WWF has been doing that with non wrestling celebrities since Mr. T. WCW didn't let Kevin Green beat Ric Flair and even TNA didn't let Frank Trigg beat AJ a few years ago.
 
Id rather watch a Cena - Rock match at mania then watch The Miz mainevent. Watching him wrestle is painful, he's never even come close to having a remotely good match & the idea that he's a legitimate champion when he's defended his title against Jerry Lawler 3 times already including a ppv.

If the WWE has a feud between Cena & The Rock headline either mania or summerslam could be one of the biggest feuds in years.

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
 
Id rather watch a Cena - Rock match at mania then watch The Miz mainevent. Watching him wrestle is painful, he's never even come close to having a remotely good match & the idea that he's a legitimate champion when he's defended his title against Jerry Lawler 3 times already including a ppv.

If the WWE has a feud between Cena & The Rock headline either mania or summerslam could be one of the biggest feuds in years.

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

I have to strongly disagree on Miz's ability and the quality of his matches. Dude has worked hard and has turned himself into a solid worker and great promo.
His feud with Jerry Lawler isn't his fault, he and Lawler are doing what they're told. It's not a real competition where he can pick his opponents.

^^^ LMAO oh shit Scott Steiner has ALWAYS been like that?! I barely remember him talking ever until he became Big Poppa Pump

Like Steve Austin, Paul used to let guys real personalities shine through even if they had a character and Scott Steiner was one. They didn't stay long but when Steiner was cutting promos on Shawn Michaels and Johnny B. Badd, I was :eek::lol:
 
what i think should happen is let the cena an miz thing go an let rock come to mania an beat the undertaker an end his streak.that will blow the rock threw the roof,i mean he is already bog yes but that will blow the mania threw the roof...great start of his new career..
 
what i think should happen is let the cena an miz thing go an let rock come to mania an beat the undertaker an end his streak.that will blow the rock threw the roof,i mean he is already bog yes but that will blow the mania threw the roof...great start of his new career..

Nah. The only way they should end The Streak is to boost a new younger wrestler. The Streak shouldn't end to any of the old heads like HHH or Kane or outside celebrities like Dwayne Johnson (sorry but The Rock's been gone and he's back to promote his movies).
 
what i think should happen is let the cena an miz thing go an let rock come to mania an beat the undertaker an end his streak.that will blow the rock threw the roof,i mean he is already bog yes but that will blow the mania threw the roof...great start of his new career..

The Rock doing it would be a complete overkill. He's already achieved a lot, and he doesn't plan to wrestle a lot, if at all. Him beating the Undertaker would take away what it would mean if somebody did break the streak.

They need a young guy, strong, believable, good worker, with good mic skills and a good finisher, and I don't think they have him yet. Personally I think it should be someone who wrestles more technical than jump and fly all over the place like Kofi, Morrison and Daniel Bryan. They need like a young Kurt Angle kind of guy to do it. The story would make sense - a young guy, never had a title shot, longs to be taken seriously as a wrestler so he wants to do something that's never been done - beat Taker at WM. He beats him and he starts getting title shots, respect from other wrestlers, fans, and his career just takes off, maybe even start his own WM streak.

It would mean something as opposed to somebody already established doing it.
 
Personally I think it should be someone who wrestles more technical than jump and fly all over the place like Kofi, Morrison and Daniel Bryan.

I'll assume that's a typo, as Daniel Bryan is about as technical as they come in the WWE. He is filling the void that once went to Chris Benoit.
 
I'll assume that's a typo, as Daniel Bryan is about as technical as they come in the WWE. He is filling the void that once went to Chris Benoit.

Yeah you're right, I take that back. He does do some technical wrestling, I forgot he was schooled by William Regal.
 
So now The Network is involved in TNA? Damn, Russo isn't satisfied stealing from ECW in the mid 90s now he's stealing from their run on TNN.

Wait, it is the same network, huh?

Fire Russo!
 
okay enuff with Bitch-off!!!!! Why is he the head of a WRESTLING group?? The champ should be the mouth and Bitch-off should be off tv as much as possible, he seems to open every fucking show! no more with this shit. Fire him, russo, and Hogan and start the fuck over. have a loser leaves tna match and get rid of them
 
okay enuff with Bitch-off!!!!! Why is he the head of a WRESTLING group?? The champ should be the mouth and Bitch-off should be off tv as much as possible, he seems to open every fucking show! no more with this shit. Fire him, russo, and Hogan and start the fuck over. have a loser leaves tna match and get rid of them

Couldn't agree more. Hardy should be in front all the time.



I'm not a fan of Booker's work as a color commentator. Part of it is him having to play off Cole's grating character but he's not doing as well as Striker was in that role. Hopefully, he'll improve as Taz did.


WWE's page on Black wrestlers in kind of cool
http://http://www.wwe.com/inside/blackhistory/
 

The Rock destroying Cena and Cole was priceless, but there was one other thing that I noticed that no body brought up so far.

I'm not feeling the Rock's new music. The Rock theme is like the NWO theme .... the best part are the ad-libs.

They completely took out all the ad-libs and turned up the guitars :smh: I was waiting for the "The Rock going take your little cd, dust it off, turn it sideway, it stick it straight up your candy ass." :lol:
 

The Rock destroying Cena and Cole was priceless, but there was one other thing that I noticed that no body brought up so far.

I'm not feeling the Rock's new music. The Rock theme is like the NWO theme .... the best part are the ad-libs.

They completely took out all the ad-libs and turned up the guitars :smh: I was waiting for the "The Rock going take your little cd, dust it off, turn it sideway, it stick it straight up your candy ass." :lol:

The music was aight, it was better than the heel theme

The 99-2001 version was the best one :yes: :
 
I have to strongly disagree on Miz's ability and the quality of his matches. Dude has worked hard and has turned himself into a solid worker and great promo.
His feud with Jerry Lawler isn't his fault, he and Lawler are doing what they're told. It's not a real competition where he can pick his opponents.



I don't doubt that Miz is a solid worker but not good enough to main event the biggest show of the year.:smh:
I believe over time Miz and guys like Morrison should be in the main event regularly but not yet. I can't recall one stand out match the Miz has had since being given this push.:confused:
They have all these dirt sheet reports saying the main event is going to be HHH vs Taker and if that's true that shows you how little faith they have in both of their title matches because if the WWE would rather push a match with two old, coming off of major injuries wrestlers over title matches with the Miz and Del Rio. That tells me they don't expect them to be great matches.

His feud with Lawler isn't his fault but it shows a lack of faith or direction that going into mania you're feuding with a semi retired announcer. The Miz smells of transition champion, since he's one the title he's defended it against Randy Orton( 2x), Morrison (as the opening match on Raw no less) and The King:hmm:
 
I have to strongly disagree on Miz's ability and the quality of his matches. Dude has worked hard and has turned himself into a solid worker and great promo.


His feud with Jerry Lawler isn't his fault, he and Lawler are doing what they're told. It's not a real competition where he can pick his opponents.



I don't doubt that Miz is a solid worker but not good enough to main event the biggest show of the year.:smh:
I believe over time Miz and guys like Morrison should be in the main event regularly but not yet. I can't recall one stand out match the Miz has had since being given this push.:confused:
Miz has had good to almost great matches with Bryan, Morrison, and Lawler since this push started when he won MitB. Plus, and this is major for WWE, he cuts good to great promos every week.


They have all these dirt sheet reports saying the main event is going to be HHH vs Taker and if that's true that shows you how little faith they have in both of their title matches because if the WWE would rather push a match with two old, coming off of major injuries wrestlers over title matches with the Miz and Del Rio. That tells me they don't expect them to be great matches.
That's not the message you should be receiving. Everyone expects Edge-Del Rios to have a good one and Miz and Cena might. HHH and Taker, if they do that (which is not a lock), would be done to have a major drawing card for 70k football stadium and the biggest ppv of the year. The match can't be any better than decent but it's a marquee match the title matches can't match.


His feud with Lawler isn't his fault but it shows a lack of faith or direction that going into mania you're feuding with a semi retired announcer. The Miz smells of transition champion, since he's one the title he's defended it against Randy Orton( 2x), Morrison (as the opening match on Raw no less) and The King:hmm:

The Lawler feud has less to do with Miz than Vince looking out for Lawler, building a new heel champ, and without sacrificing anyone else they could use in the future.
He's definitely going to lose to Cena but this will be the first of many title runs by Miz, very similar to Edge's first title run.


If anyone beats the Undertaker we should riot :lol:

The man has been a solid performer and a true work horse for the company for over 20 years.

I think he has earned the right to retire undefeated.



I just don't see it like that. The best thing Taker could do is insist on putting over a young guy at Mania. Not HHH or Cena or Orton but a Barrett or Sheamus or Ezekiel Jackson. That's that new WWE style of thinking that a guy goes out without building up a young guy in the process.
 
I just don't see it like that. The best thing Taker could do is insist on putting over a young guy at Mania. Not HHH or Cena or Orton but a Barrett or Sheamus or Ezekiel Jackson. That's that new WWE style of thinking that a guy goes out without building up a young guy in the process.


I did use to think like that, but the problem is that there is not one up and coming young guy that I think deserves to be the one to beat him.

The mid card in the WWE is at a all time low right now. I would rather see Taker leave undefeated than see the Taker lose to a young guy, then the WWE completely fucks up the push for that person and the win over the Taker becomes meaningless.
 

If anyone beats the Undertaker we should riot :lol:

The man has been a solid performer and a true work horse for the company for over 20 years.

I think he has earned the right to retire undefeated.


Exactly, There is no reason for the Taker to lose at mania, the streak will never happen again, so why fuck with it.
 
Back
Top