Tea party protesters scream 'nig.ger' at black congressman

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>
Tea party protesters scream 'nig.ger'
at black congressman</font size></center>



resized_johnlewis.jpg




McClatchy Newspapers
By William Douglas
March 20, 2010


WASHINGTON — Demonstrators outside the U.S. Capitol, angry over the proposed health care bill, shouted "******" Saturday at U.S. Rep. John Lewis, a Georgia congressman and civil rights icon who was nearly beaten to death during an Alabama march in the 1960s.

Protesters also shouted obscenities at other members of the Congressional Black Caucus, spat on at least one black lawmaker and confronted an openly gay congressman with taunts.

Capitol Police escorted the members of Congress into the Capitol after the confrontation. At least one demonstrator was reported arrested.

"They were shouting, sort of harassing," Lewis said. "But, it's okay, I've faced this before. It reminded me of the 60s. It was a lot of downright hate and anger and people being downright mean."

Lewis said he was leaving the Cannon office building to walk to the Capitol to vote when protesters shouted "Kill the bill, kill the bill," Lewis said.

"I said 'I'm for the bill, I support the bill, I'm voting for the bill'," Lewis said.

A colleague who was accompanying Lewis said people in the crowd responded by saying "Kill the bill, then the n-word."

"It surprised me that people are so mean and we can't engage in a civil dialogue and debate," Lewis said.

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo., said he was a few yards behind Lewis and distinctly heard "******."

"It was a chorus," Cleaver said. "In a way, I feel sorry for those people who are doing this nasty stuff - they're being whipped up. I decided I wouldn't be angry with any of them."

Cleaver's office said later in a statement that he'd also been spat upon and that Capitol Police had arrested his assailant. The statement praised the police, who Cleaver said escorted the members of Congress into the Capitol past the demonstrators.

"The man who spat on the congressman was arrested, but the congressman has chosen not to press charges," the statement said.

"This is not the first time the Congressman has been called the 'n' word and certainly not the worst assault he has endured in his years fighting for equal rights for all Americans," the statement said. "That being said, he is disappointed that in the 21st century our national discourse has devolved to the point of name calling and spitting."

Protesters also used a slur as they confronted Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., an openly gay member of Congress.

Frank told the Boston Globe that the incident happened as he was walking from the Longworth office building to the Rayburn office building, both a short distance from the Capitol. Frank said the crowd consisted of a couple of hundred of people and that they referred to him as 'homo.' A writer for The Huffington Post said the protesters called Frank a "faggot."

"I'm disappointed with the unwillingness to be civil," Frank told the Globe. "I was, I guess, surprised by the rancor. What it means is obviously the health care bill is proxy for a lot of other sentiments, some of which are perfectly reasonable, but some of which are not."

"People out there today, on the whole, were really hateful," Frank said. "The leaders of this movement have a responsibility to speak out more."

Thousands of demonstrators gathered outside the Capitol on Saturday as the House Democratic leadership worked to gather enough votes to enact a health care overhaul proposal that has become the centerpiece of President Barack Obama's domestic agenda. Most were affiliated with so-called tea party organizations that originally sprang up during last summer's protests of the health care proposals.


Heated debate has surrounded what role race plays in the motivations of the tea party demonstrators. During protests last summer, demonstrators displayed:

  • a poster depicting Obama as an African witch doctor complete with headdress, above the words "OBAMACARE coming to a clinic near you."

  • Former President Jimmy Carter asserted in September that racism was a major factor behind the hostility that Obama's proposals had faced.

  • The claim brought angry rebuttals from Republicans. Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, who is black, accused Carter of playing the "race card."

On Saturday, Frank, however, said he was sorry Republican leaders didn't do more to disown the protesters.

Some Republicans "think they are benefiting from this rancor," he said.


House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., said Saturday's ugliness underscored for him that the health care overhaul isn't the only motivation for many protesters.

"I heard people saying things today I've not heard since March 15th, 1960, when I was marching to try and get off the back of the bus," Clyburn said. "This is incredible, shocking to me."

He added, "A lot of us have said for a long time that none of this is about health care at all. It's about extending a basic fundamental right to people who are less powerful."

(James Rosen contributed to this story.)



http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/03/20/90772/rep-john-lewis-charges-protesters.html
 
in either case it's bad. I just want to know if it was said in the first place..

<font size="3">Is this not good enough:


fn-header.jpg



The incident occurred Saturday after thousands of Tea Partiers descended upon Capitol Hill to rally against Sunday's major vote on health care reform.

Some of the protesters targeted a handful of black members of Congress and one gay lawmaker as they walked from the House office buildings to the Capitol to make a procedural vote.

Reps. John Lewis, D-Ga, and Andre Carson, D-Ind., both members of the Congressional Black Caucus, said that a group of protesters hollered at them and called them the N-word.

"They were just shouting. Harassing," Lewis told Fox News. "People being downright mean."

Kristie Greco, spokeswoman for Democratic Whip Jim Clyburn, said a protester spit on Rep. Emanuel Cleaver who is black and said police escorted the lawmakers into the Capitol. Cleaver's office said he would decline to press charges, but Sgt. Kimberly Schneider of the U.S. Capitol Police said in an e-mail later: "We did not make any arrests today."

Clyburn, who led fellow black students in integrating South Carolina's public facilities a half century ago, called the behavior "absolutely shocking."

"I heard people saying things today that I have not heard since March 15, 1960, when I was marching to try to get off the back of the bus," Clyburn told reporters.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...condemns-racial-slurs-hurled-black-lawmakers/

? ? ?

</font size>
 
in either case it's bad. I just want to know if it was said in the first place..

<font size="3">Is this:


fn-header.jpg



The incident occurred Saturday after thousands of Tea Partiers descended upon Capitol Hill to rally against Sunday's major vote on health care reform.

Some of the protesters targeted a handful of black members of Congress and one gay lawmaker as they walked from the House office buildings to the Capitol to make a procedural vote.

Reps. John Lewis, D-Ga, and Andre Carson, D-Ind., both members of the Congressional Black Caucus, said that a group of protesters hollered at them and called them the N-word.

"They were just shouting. Harassing," Lewis told Fox News. "People being downright mean."

Kristie Greco, spokeswoman for Democratic Whip Jim Clyburn, said a protester spit on Rep. Emanuel Cleaver who is black and said police escorted the lawmakers into the Capitol. Cleaver's office said he would decline to press charges, but Sgt. Kimberly Schneider of the U.S. Capitol Police said in an e-mail later: "We did not make any arrests today."

Clyburn, who led fellow black students in integrating South Carolina's public facilities a half century ago, called the behavior "absolutely shocking."

"I heard people saying things today that I have not heard since March 15, 1960, when I was marching to try to get off the back of the bus," Clyburn told reporters.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...condemns-racial-slurs-hurled-black-lawmakers/

not good enough

? ? ?
</font size>
 
. . . more, "just reports" . . .

<font size="3">
<center>

Words, to

Bricks, to

What else ???

</font size></center>

<IFRAME SRC="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/03/24/91019/words-and-now-bricks-thrown-at.html" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/03/24/91019/words-and-now-bricks-thrown-at.html">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Updated: 4:55 p.m. U.S. Rep. Tom Perriello’s brother received a threatening letter in the mail on the same day that someone apparently severed a gas line at the home in Ivy.

Two conservative Tea Party activists posted the address of the home on the Internet on Monday, mistakenly believing it was the home of the congressman. One of the activists urged others to “drop by” and “express their thanks” for Perriello’s vote in favor of health care reform.

Tuesday evening, Perriello’s brother’s family smelled gas and discovered the propane line of a gas-powered grill on their screened-in porch had been slashed.

In the mail, they found a letter addressed to the congressman that Perriello’s office described as “threatening.”

“It was not an explicit threat, but it was a threatening letter,” a source in Congressman Perriello’s office said, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “It was along the lines of ‘You’ll have to answer for this on judgment day.’”

Some birth of a nation type bullshit going on.

-VG
 
I need video and audio. These are just reports. soooooo....


...soooooo using your logic, which for lack of a better term in reference to republikkkans, is an extreme stretch to say the least, since there was no video or audio of the resurrection or the virgin birth or Lincoln being assassinated, then it didn't happen. Am I reading you correctly?

I know you are just parroting, as usual, the O'Riley/Limbaugh talking points,. Now you can say when you use Limbaugh as source, I shoot them down (sorry to use a republikkkan argument term.
 
What difference does it make you use the word all the time, so it must be OK if whites use it, or at least republikkkans!

...soooooo using your logic, which for lack of a better term in reference to republikkkans, is an extreme stretch to say the least, since there was no video or audio of the resurrection or the virgin birth or Lincoln being assassinated, then it didn't happen. Am I reading you correctly?

I know you are just parroting, as usual, the O'Riley/Limbaugh talking points,. Now you can say when you use Limbaugh as source, I shoot them down (sorry to use a republikkkan argument term.

Is this how you going to debate with me? Every time I make an obvious statement "oh you must got that from RUSH LIMBAUGH!?!?!?!". I'm starting to think that you are actually scared of the man. Don't you know every time you claim I got my information from Rush, you make him a little bit MORE popular? I can go weeks without even mentioning the man's name, and just post from how I feel as a conservative. Believe it or not, there's a lot of things me and Rush differs in. For example, immigration, I don't think Amnesty is a big deal to fight against. Hell, I believe we need to take of the border more importantly. He *Rush* is on the end of deporting illegals. To me, that's going to be a waste of resources.

I don't even watch Glen Beck, or O'reilly *please at least spell the man's name right*.

Back to the post, I know that there's has to be video of this incident SOMEWHERE. Unlike the examples you gave *Jesus, and Lincoln's death* we have a WIDE array of video capabilities. Thus, making me think since the lack of video is around, that this possibly DID NOT HAPPEN. I am ready to throw rocks to my fellow conservatives who did such of an act, but until I see and hear it, I'm going to not go by reports. Hell, at least I'm not doing what the 9-11 truth movement is doing.....
 
Is this how you going to debate with me? Every time I make an obvious statement "oh you must got that from RUSH LIMBAUGH!?!?!?!". I'm starting to think that you are actually scared of the man. Don't you know every time you claim I got my information from Rush, you make him a little bit MORE popular? I can go weeks without even mentioning the man's name, and just post from how I feel as a conservative. Believe it or not, there's a lot of things me and Rush differs in. For example, immigration, I don't think Amnesty is a big deal to fight against. Hell, I believe we need to take of the border more importantly. He *Rush* is on the end of deporting illegals. To me, that's going to be a waste of resources.

I don't even watch Glen Beck, or O'reilly *please at least spell the man's name right*.

Back to the post, I know that there's has to be video of this incident SOMEWHERE. Unlike the examples you gave *Jesus, and Lincoln's death* we have a WIDE array of video capabilities. Thus, making me think since the lack of video is around, that this possibly DID NOT HAPPEN. I am ready to throw rocks to my fellow conservatives who did such of an act, but until I see and hear it, I'm going to not go by reports. Hell, at least I'm not doing what the 9-11 truth movement is doing.....

Don't you know every time you claim I got my information from Rush, you make him a little bit MORE popular?

Your thought process is predictable, you operate on popularity rather than facts. hence the massive amounts of money used to prop up Sarah Falin. BTW, a reality series?:lol:

I know that there's has to be video of this incident SOMEWHERE

[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/f7wYt9jee2U&hl=en_US&fs=1[/FLASH]
porch-monkey.jpg
 
. . . I know that there's has to be video of this incident SOMEWHERE . . . Thus, making me think since the lack of video is around, that this possibly DID NOT HAPPEN. I am ready to throw rocks to my fellow conservatives who did such of an act, but until I see and hear it, I'm going to not go by reports.

Hell, I posted the story straight from "your' conservative bible:

fn-header.jpg

You mean you've suddenly upped your standards ? ? ? :lol:

QueEx
 
Back to the post, I know that there's has to be video of this incident SOMEWHERE. Unlike the examples you gave *Jesus, and Lincoln's death* we have a WIDE array of video capabilities. Thus, making me think since the lack of video is around, that this possibly DID NOT HAPPEN. I am ready to throw rocks to my fellow conservatives who did such of an act, but until I see and hear it, I'm going to not go by reports. Hell, at least I'm not doing what the 9-11 truth movement is doing.....

Here ya go, start hurling!:lol:
(funny you didn't reply to this post.):smh:

Bag+of+rocks.jpg
 
Here ya go, start hurling!:lol:
(funny you didn't reply to this post.):smh:

Bag+of+rocks.jpg

dude I was doing other things...

All I'm going to say is to NOT judge the whole tea party because of this group.

You would not like if people judge you because what another liberal did would you?
 
What was the point of the video. I didn't hear the n-word nor did I see someone get spit on. I may have saw someone catch some spit while another person was yelling "Kill the Bill" but not intentional spitting. If I missed the n-word on the video then clearly point out the time on it where it happened.

All the news stories above seem to quote a lawmaker saying someone called them the n-word and was spat on. None of them seem to cite anything but the "victim's" account of what happen as proof.
 
I didn't hear the n-word nor did I see someone get spit on. I may have saw someone catch some spit while another person was yelling "Kill the Bill" but not intentional spitting.

And the congressman returned with the police officer looking for the perpetrator with that purpose in mind. Today's negros would defend lynchings as an expression of freedom of speech. Go back to your hole next to Dick Cheney.

source: Politico

Cleaver spat on

Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) was spat on by a protester as he entered the Capitol to vote this afternoon. It was the third incident today where a lawmaker was disrespected by an anti-reform protester. Both Reps. John Lewis, a civil rights giant, and Barney Frank, who is gay, were the subject of racial and homophobic epithets.

The man who spat on Cleaver was arrested, but Cleaver did not press charges. Cleaver spokesman Danny Rotert said:
 
Last edited:
On your own video, did you hear the n-word? I asked you to point it out.

On your own video, did you see someone spit on someone else?

Or did you assume it must have happened, and intentionally, because the congressman came back with a cop? I assumed it must have happened since he came back with a cop, but since I didn't see an obvious spitting motion I can't assume it was intentional.

If you want to understand how I could dare assume it wasn't intentional since it wasn't obvious, just imagine that Jesus wasn't president and the CBC were not his disciples, then you wouldn't take everything those attention whores said on faith.
 
On your own video, did you hear the n-word? I asked you to point it out.

On your own video, did you see someone spit on someone else?

Or did you assume it must have happened, and intentionally, because the congressman came back with a cop? I assumed it must have happened since he came back with a cop, but since I didn't see an obvious spitting motion I can't assume it was intentional.

If you want to understand how I could dare assume it wasn't intentional since it wasn't obvious, just imagine that Jesus wasn't president and the CBC were not his disciples, then you wouldn't take everything those attention whores said on faith.

Don't worry about it Greed. They need this....
 
On your own video, did you hear the n-word? I asked you to point it out.

On your own video, did you see someone spit on someone else?

Or did you assume it must have happened, and intentionally, because the congressman came back with a cop? I assumed it must have happened since he came back with a cop, but since I didn't see an obvious spitting motion I can't assume it was intentional.

If you want to understand how I could dare assume it wasn't intentional since it wasn't obvious, just imagine that Jesus wasn't president and the CBC were not his disciples, then you wouldn't take everything those attention whores said on faith.

source: Washington Post


I saw someone flinch then wipe his face with his hand.

Did you see President Lincoln get shot? Do you take his assassination claim on faith?

Your move.
 
Last edited:
source: Washington Post



I saw someone flinch then wipe his face with his hand.

Did you see President Lincoln get shot? Do you take his assassination claim on faith?

Your move.

There's evidence that showed that Lincoln was shot.

I'm not saying it did/didn't occur, but your argument is weak if you running that out.

BTW, thanks for sending the hounds out on the main board. You helped me become more popular.

No need for excuses. Excuses is the prelude to weakness.

BTW, I can careless if you did, or not. You posted a bullshit thread like I was ignoring you. I mean damn you couldn't wait a damn hour for a response?

Don't take this as whining, this is more of a thank you... Seriously...

:lol::lol::lol:
 
On your own video, did you hear the n-word? I asked you to point it out.
Of course, its not my video and (despite that I ocassionally post vids) I dislike them posted to prove points unless (1) its clearly stated what point the video is purporting to make; and (2 the poster indicates at what point in the video the point is being made.

Nevertheless, this video cannot be used to argue the negative, that is, that the N word was not used. It seems obvious that the video was recorded at such a distance away that the sounds heard were <u>not</u> coming from the footage seen. I watched the video over and over and I could not hear the words of anyone standing on the steps to the building. If one cannot hear the words of those on the steps, I find it impossible to believe that "this video" records the words of anyone, in the picture, from the .40 mark (when it appears Cleaver & Lewis entered the picture) and the 1.46 mark when Cleaver leaves the picture, apparently entering the building.

At the 1.25 mark when Cleaver gestures as if something has stunned him, we cannot hear what the W/M with the dark shirt & light baseball cap was saying; we can see, however, that his mouth was moving rapidly with his head shaking in an argumentative manner, suggesting that he was not merely chanting kill the bill (which is what we were hearing on the video at the time). Even when dark-shirt's mouth is trained towards the camera, we can see he was not chanting, kill-the-bill.

So, the video simply does not support the argument or inference that the "N" word was not used.


On . . . [the] video, did you see someone spit on someone else? Or did you assume it must have happened, and intentionally, because the congressman came back with a cop?

No. we can't see whether W/M shirt/cap spat and, if so, whether it was intentional or unintentional.

W/M shirt/cap had his hands circling (covering) his mouth, hence we could not hear and we could not see. But, at the 1:25 mark, something happened as we see Cleaver reacting as if startled (it could have been from something that was said; it could have been from the sudden volume of what was said; or it could have been because the guy spat on him).

Because W/M Shirt/Cap had his mouth covered, the video does not give us enough to conclude that it was intentional nor, however, does it provide anything leading to the conclusion that it was unintentional.

  • While we could not hear what W/M Shirt/Cap was saying, it is obvious, as I pointed out above, that his mouth was moving far too rapid with his head shaking in an argumentative manner - for him to have been chanting kill-the-bill.

  • The fact that Cleaver flenched at the 1:25 mark certainly suggest that something happened and his reaction was consistent with someone having been spat upon.

  • Curiously, Cleaver does not wipe his face until the 1:43 mark, 8 seconds after he has walked away from W/M Shirt/Cap. People react differently to different stimuli, but I feel certain that I would have wiped at the 1:256 mark, which would have been less than a split second before the 1.257 mark: the point where W/M Shirt/Cap would have been trying to get my foot outta his ass!

QueEx
 
Of course, its not my video and (despite that I ocassionally post vids) I dislike them posted to prove points unless (1) its clearly stated what point the video is purporting to make; and (2 the poster indicates at what point in the video the point is being made.

Nevertheless, this video cannot be used to argue the negative, that is, that the N word was not used. It seems obvious that the video was recorded at such a distance away that the sounds heard were <u>not</u> coming from the footage seen. I watched the video over and over and I could not hear the words of anyone standing on the steps to the building. If one cannot hear the words of those on the steps, I find it impossible to believe that "this video" records the words of anyone, in the picture, from the .40 mark (when it appears Cleaver & Lewis entered the picture) and the 1.46 mark when Cleaver leaves the picture, apparently entering the building.

At the 1.25 mark when Cleaver gestures as if something has stunned him, we cannot hear what the W/M with the dark shirt & light baseball cap was saying; we can see, however, that his mouth was moving rapidly with his head shaking in an argumentative manner, suggesting that he was not merely chanting kill the bill (which is what we were hearing on the video at the time). Even when dark-shirt's mouth is trained towards the camera, we can see he was not chanting, kill-the-bill.

So, the video simply does not support the argument or inference that the "N" word was not used.




No. we can't see whether W/M shirt/cap spat and, if so, whether it was intentional or unintentional.

W/M shirt/cap had his hands circling (covering) his mouth, hence we could not hear and we could not see. But, at the 1:25 mark, something happened as we see Cleaver reacting as if startled (it could have been from something that was said; it could have been from the sudden volume of what was said; or it could have been because the guy spat on him).

Because W/M Shirt/Cap had his mouth covered, the video does not give us enough to conclude that it was intentional nor, however, does it provide anything leading to the conclusion that it was unintentional.

  • While we could not hear what W/M Shirt/Cap was saying, it is obvious, as I pointed out above, that his mouth was moving far too rapid with his head shaking in an argumentative manner - for him to have been chanting kill-the-bill.

  • The fact that Cleaver flenched at the 1:25 mark certainly suggest that something happened and his reaction was consistent with someone having been spat upon.

  • Curiously, Cleaver does not wipe his face until the 1:43 mark, 8 seconds after he has walked away from W/M Shirt/Cap. People react differently to different stimuli, but I feel certain that I would have wiped at the 1:256 mark, which would have been less than a split second before the 1.257 mark: the point where W/M Shirt/Cap would have been trying to get my foot outta his ass!

QueEx

*back from 2 day hiatus*

Honestly, if he was spat on, and called a ******, he sure didn't act mad about it.

Find me a black person *in spite of their politics* who would of took that kind of abuse. Fuck the race thing, NO man will just allow another man to just spit in his face like without a cuss word, or anything. I don't care if its a million against me.
 
*back from 2 day hiatus*

Honestly, if he was spat on, and called a ******, he sure didn't act mad about it.

Find me a black person *in spite of their politics* who would of took that kind of abuse. Fuck the race thing, NO man will just allow another man to just spit in his face like without a cuss word, or anything. I don't care if its a million against me.

That's what has me confused.

If all this happened, why didn't he exercise his rights to pursue remedy in the law? I mean, he is a lawmaker.

I don't really believe any of this happened, if this is the response.

It just seems like more propaganda games being played by the media.
 
*back from 2 day hiatus*

Honestly, if he was spat on, and called a ******, he sure didn't act mad about it.

Find me a black person *in spite of their politics* who would of took that kind of abuse. Fuck the race thing, NO man will just allow another man to just spit in his face like without a cuss word, or anything. I don't care if its a million against me.

mlking25october1960.jpg
 
Que,

I did not promote it didn't happen or that the video proved it didn't happen. In fact, I took i for granted that it did happen and that's why I asked for proof because I figured it would be out there.

The most reported on bill in recent history plus a nationally known opposition citizens group at the Capitol on the day the bill is being voted on and no video proof? Jesse Jackson Jr was holding up two camera phones.

I really wonder what's the point of all this.
 
Que,

I did not promote it didn't happen or that the video proved it didn't happen. In fact, I took i for granted that it did happen and that's why I asked for proof because I figured it would be out there.

The most reported on bill in recent history plus a nationally known opposition citizens group at the Capitol on the day the bill is being voted on and no video proof? Jesse Jackson Jr was holding up two camera phones.

I really wonder what's the point of all this.

Frankly, I wonder too; and my best hunch is not a pretty one.

I think there is a fairly large segment of white America starting to get desperate - - fearing that America as they know it, that their near-absolute racial dominance is slip, slipping away. I may be wrong, but everything I see points in that direction.

That segment of the population, I believe, is using the economy and other benign issues as a subterfuge for their real frustration. For whats really irking them: their fear that America is in fact browning and the election of Barack Obama is not only evidence of what may happen in 20 years or so, but his election has left many with a feeling that the browning may have accelerated.

The reaction in this country to Healthcare reform is strikingly similar to outrage during and in the aftermath of the Civil Rights Act and integration. The nation quickly found out, if it didn't already know, that the South wasn't the only bastion of anti-black sentiment. The desegregation in Chicago was as contentious and as ugly as in Selma.

The phrase "Take back our country" common among tea baggers is a 60's convention. Labeling black leaders as "Socialist" (a la Barack Obama) didn't start in 2009. Ironically, 42 YEARS AGO TO THIS DAY another pioneering African American labeled by many in white-America as a "Socialist" gave his life fighting inequality. R.I.P. M.L.K.



QueEx
 
Thomas Sowell: Playing the race card in politics is a dangerous game
By Thomas Sowell
Syndicated columnist
Posted: 04/09/2010 12:01:00 AM PDT

FEW COMBINATIONS are more poisonous than race and politics. That combination has torn nations apart and led to the slaughters of millions in countries around the world.

You might think we would have learned a lesson from that and stay away from injecting race into political issues. Yet playing the race card has become an increasingly common response to growing public anger at the policies of the Obama administration and the way those policies have been imposed.

When the triumphant Democrats made their widely televised walk up Capitol Hill after passing the health care bill, led by a smirking and strutting Nancy Pelosi, holding her oversized gavel, some of the crowd of citizens expressed their anger. According to some Democrats, these expressions of anger included racial slurs directed at black members of Congress.

This is a serious charge — and one deserving of some serious evidence. But, despite all the media recording devices on the scene, not to mention recording devices among the crowd gathered there, nobody can come up with a single recorded sound to back up that incendiary charge.

Worse yet, some people have claimed that even doubting the charge suggests that you are a racist.

Among the people who are likely to be most disappointed with the Obama administration are those who thought it would usher in a post-racial society. That they wished for such a society is a credit to their
Advertisement values. But that they actually expected a move in that direction suggests that they ignored both Barack Obama's history and the heavy vested interest that too many people have in race hustling.

This is just one of many areas in which this country is likely to pay a very high price because too many voters paid attention to Obama's rhetoric while ignoring his actual track record.

However soothing the Obama rhetoric, and however lofty his statements about being a uniter rather than a divider — both racially and in terms of bipartisanship — everything in his past fairly shouts the opposite, but only to those who follow facts.

Has he been allied with uniters or dividers in the past? Do Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers and Father Pfleger sound like uniters?

What has his administration done — as distinguished from what the president has said — since taking office?

It has dropped the prosecution of black thugs caught on camera stationed outside a polling place intimidating voters.

Obama has promoted to the Supreme Court a circuit judge who dismissed a discrimination lawsuit by white firefighters, whose case the Supreme Court later accepted and ruled in their favor.

He preceded this appointment by talking about needing people on the court with "empathy." That is a pretty word but the ugly reality is that it is just another euphemism for bias. For generations, white Southern judges had all kinds of empathy for other white Southerners, which is to say, bias against blacks.

The question is whether you want equal treatment or you want payback. Cycles of revenge and counter-revenge have been at the heart of racial and ethnic strife throughout history, in countries around the world. It is a history written in blood. It is history we don't need to repeat in the United States of America.

Political demagoguery and political favoritism have turned groups violently against each other, even in countries where they have lived peacefully side by side for generations. Ceylon was one of those countries in the first half of the 20th century, before the politics of group favoritism so polarized the country — now called Sri Lanka — that it produced a decades-long civil war with mass slaughters and unspeakable atrocities.

The world has been shocked by the mass slaughters of the Tutsis by the Hutus in Rwanda but, half a century ago, there had been no such systematic slaughters there. Political demagoguery whipped up ethnic polarization, among people who had coexisted, who spoke the same language and had even intermarried.

We know — or should know — what lies at the end of the road of racial polarization. A "race card" is not something to play, because race is a very dangerous political plaything.



http://www.contracostatimes.com/opinion/ci_14845917
 
Back
Top