Sports Illustrated Tries the Tablet (Death of the NetBooks)

Jagi

True Fist of the North Star
OG Investor
Sports Illustrated Tries the Tablet


decode-si-tab-190.jpg


Sports Illustrated today unveiled a prototype of what its magazine would look like on a tablet computer. While it won’t be available to consumers until tablet computers are — presumably sometime next year — it’s an important move for the magazine industry. If magazines can charge for content on tablet computers, and give advertisers data on who’s seeing their ads, a lot of their problems could be solved.

Apple, Hewlett-Packard and other manufacturers are expected to release tablet computers next year. While it’s unclear exactly what they’ll look like, the general guess is they’ll be like big iPhones, with interactive touch-screens. The larger size makes it feasible to put a magazine page on a tablet.

S.I. is sending over a video later this afternoon that will demonstrate the tablet’s capabilities, but here are a few of them. It replicates the magazine on the tablet computer, letting readers flip through the pages as though it’s a print product. The functionality, though, lets readers interact with the magazine much more. They can rearrange the sections and stories to read in whatever order they like. They can watch videos and see additional pictures from photo shoots.

They can get live updates of sports scores from all the teams they follow, or create pages of teams or athletes that pulls live statistics. When a match is on that the reader is interested in, an alert can pop up, and provide a way for the reader to play along — guessing whether Serena Williams will double-fault, for instance. And there’s a little wheel-shaped toolbar that pops up with any picture, quote or story that allows the reader to print, e-mail, share on Facebook, see related Twitter posts, view comments, get more stories about the topic, save the text or photograph to a favorites file, and other tools.

The pages’ design derives from print, though. For instance, readers are not allowed to zoom in and zoom out on text, and must instead view it on a fixed page (although they can select a text size). Terry McDonell, editorof the Sports Illustrated Group, said in an interview at his office that the adherence to the print design was intentional.

“There’s something really great about magazines, about browsing,” he said. “Let’s heighten that.”

The product can be viewed without an Internet connection, though readers will need a wireless connection to download a new issue, watch video, or get live news and scores. David Link, the founder of Wonderfactory, which helped design the product, said he was not sure yet how it would be distributed, whether through iTunes or other companies’ marketplaces.

There are huge opportunities on the advertising front, Mr. McDonell said. Advertisers have been fleeing from print in part because print ads aren’t measurable — they don’t know how many people read them. Interactive ads on the tablet would provide hard numbers on readership and time spent with an ad. And an advantage over the Internet is that creatively, advertisers would not be limited to fixed boxes like they are on online. A concert promoter could include footage of Mariah Carey singing along with links to buy tickets to her show, while a camera advertiser could pull cost comparisons for his product at the reader’s local stores. “The question is, how do you make ads useful,” Mr. Link said. “It almost makes the ad a mini Web site.”

While no tablet computers have been released, and so there are no standards for Wonderfactory to work with, it’s creating the prototype with the assumption that Apple will create an iPhone-esque tablet next year that Wonderfactory can adjust the prototype for. “We’re taking a best guess that this has been designed for the Apple,” Mr. Link said, which he described as “the best-case scenario,” meaning having the most functionality. But he said this could be adjusted to other manufacturers’ tablet computers, too, and for other magazines.

A tablet might give manufacturers the chance for, essentially, a do-over in the online world. Magazines largely chose not to charge for content when Web sites became popular, assuming that online advertising would make up the difference. It hasn’t, which is one reason why magazines are in a bad state today.

Mr. McDonell said he was going to charge for the tablet version of the magazine, but was considering several models. Those may include offering subscriptions only, allowing purchases of single copies, or offering a discount on a tablet if consumers bought a certain type of subscription. “There are about 20 different models being worked on here,” he said.

While Mr. Link said he expects the first tablet computers to be ready in the second quarter of 2009, he is also working on platforms that are available now, like the iPhone. Mr. Link said Wonderfactory was also working on an iPhone version of Entertainment Weekly, another Time Inc. title. At Conde Nast, GQ is introducing an iPhone version of its magazine that costs $2.99.
 
How is it the death of the netbook when they are two different things appealing to different needs, uses and/or demographics?:confused:

Its like saying: Iphones, the death of Blackberry

Makes no sense.
 
How is it the death of the netbook when they are two different things appealing to different needs, uses and/or demographics?:confused:

Its like saying: Iphones, the death of Blackberry

Makes no sense.

actually iphones the death of blackberry's make sense in the sense that they are smartphones..

netbooks are for people who do not need a full blown computer to only do internet email...

the tablet is even more smaller and designed for the person who only needs internet and email.. with a slicker design than netbooks..


why get a netbook when you can get a tablet..


now if i would have said "the tablet, the death of the desktop pc" then yeah that would make no sense..
 
actually iphones the death of blackberry's make sense in the sense that they are smartphones..

netbooks are for people who do not need a full blown computer to only do internet email...

the tablet is even more smaller and designed for the person who only needs internet and email.. with a slicker design than netbooks..


why get a netbook when you can get a tablet..


now if i would have said "the tablet, the death of the desktop pc" then yeah that would make no sense..
Ummm No. Iphone/blackberry makes absolutely no sense. They are not competitors and they both have a niche market, which for the most part does not overlap. Generally speaking, a consumer is not gonna be deciding between one and the other. Please stop Jagi.

Same applies for netbooks and tablets. One wont replace the other. Nobody is gonna get a tablet for word processing and heavy doc review/editing. Its a casual use machine good for interactive multi media. You're reaching.

Stop trying for the dramatic and controversial edge.
 
Ummm No. Iphone/blackberry makes absolutely no sense. They are not competitors and they both have a niche market, which for the most part does not overlap. Generally speaking, a consumer is not gonna be deciding between one and the other. Please stop Jagi.

Same applies for netbooks and tablets. One wont replace the other. Nobody is gonna get a tablet for word processing and heavy doc review/editing. Its a casual use machine good for interactive multi media. You're reaching.

Stop trying for the dramatic and controversial edge.

Odd.. cause everyone at my company IS deciding in favor of the iPhone over the Blackberry

I've set up 3 Corporate iPhones at work this week. 2 last week.

with the tablet/netbook, the main people i've seen ask about are usually older women who want to go to qvc.com and look up recipes on a small device, maybe check out the website or read an issue of InStyle.. tablet fits the bill
 
Odd.. cause everyone at my company IS deciding in favor of the iPhone over the Blackberry

I've set up 3 Corporate iPhones at work this week. 2 last week.

with the tablet/netbook, the main people i've seen ask about are usually older women who want to go to qvc.com and look up recipes on a small device, maybe check out the website or read an issue of InStyle.. tablet fits the bill
Notice i said general and typically. Of course there are some but the exception only proves the rule. They are niche products appealing to different segments and consumers for the most part. Your company doesnt represent the general public or consumer (and i also doubt that EVERYONE is deciding between the two some clearly want one or the other). And for every old bag wanting to shop at home on a tablet/netbook there are 10students who use the netbook for school related purposes and another 10 commuting workers/professionals who use it for professional purposes, neither of which will be able to use that tablet for the same effect.
 
Notice i said general and typically. Of course there are some but the exception only proves the rule. They are niche products appealing to different segments and consumers for the most part. Your company doesnt represent the general public or consumer (and i also doubt that EVERYONE is deciding between the two some clearly want one or the other). And for every old bag wanting to shop at home on a tablet/netbook there are 10students who use the netbook for school related purposes and another 10 commuting workers/professionals who use it for professional purposes, neither of which will be able to use that tablet for the same effect.

since the majority of blackberry customers are corporate users, i would say yes, it does. I think i remember many on BGOL claiming that the iPhone would not be corporate ready for at least 2 or 3 years if at all :lol:

also the niche comment is going against itself.. first the iphone was a consumer only never corporate, now its also corporate ......................but its also niche cause I'm talking about corporate and not consumer? So is it niche or not? cause consumers have adopted it and corporate are adopting it, so wouldnt that make the iphone no longer a niche product?..

if the tablet (which is not an apple only product) is a cheaper corporate option, they will go with that (especially once an executive decides its ok to make a standard) a few executives took some netbook and iphone courses for the purposes of testing media on small devices.. .. everyone gladly gave back the netbook and we have no users who will take them off our hands unless we force them to take it.. iphones? no one wants to return them, they want to keep them.. tablets? the world will explode

only people out of the equation are creative departments.. they get macbook pros, cant do what they need on a netbook or tablet, their only beef is some of them are stuck with 13" screens

But my main reason for the "death of the netbook" comment.. the netbook has been taking off BUT before it could be a default option.. the tablet WILL cut into its market.. there are already many saddened consumers because as broke as they are they would love nothing more than to by a Tablet (from apple of hewlet packard) this christmas... for themselves..
 
since the majority of blackberry customers are corporate users, i would say yes, it does. ..
Umm NO. That would be false. Though they have a mojority of the corporate smartphone market, the majority of blackberry users are not corporate users. It isnt 2002 anymore.
I think i remember many on BGOL claiming that the iPhone would not be corporate ready for at least 2 or 3 years if at all :lol:..
Yea and they were right. Its 2009 and iphone just got gmail right? I think its safe to say that the iphone is just recently become corporate ready and accepted. That 2-3year prediction sounds about right to me.
also the niche comment is going against itself.. first the iphone was a consumer only never corporate, now its also corporate ......................but its also niche cause I'm talking about corporate and not consumer? So is it niche or not? cause consumers have adopted it and corporate are adopting it, so wouldnt that make the iphone no longer a niche product?
Did you read my post? I addressed this. The exception only validates the rule. The fact that they have cracked into the corporate market does not negate the fact that its still a niche product. Enough of BB v iphone. We're getting awa from the point.
if the tablet (which is not an apple only product) is a cheaper corporate option, they will go with that (especially once an executive decides its ok to make a standard) a few executives took some netbook and iphone courses for the purposes of testing media on small devices.. .. everyone gladly gave back the netbook and we have no users who will take them off our hands unless we force them to take it.. iphones? no one wants to return them, they want to keep them.. tablets? the world will explode..
So you base you asinine title on the possibility that tablets may become a cheaper option and the fact that a few execs at your company prefer them?:lol: Man GTFOH! Even then you're only addressing the popularity among the corporate sectors (your office to be specific), not the general public. You FAIL!
But my main reason for the "death of the netbook" comment.. the netbook has been taking off BUT before it could be a default option.. the tablet WILL cut into its market.. there are already many saddened consumers because as broke as they are they would love nothing more than to by a Tablet (from apple of hewlet packard) this christmas... for themselves..
But again, you seem to think that those using netbooks can, will and want to use a tablet. Not the case. The avergae netbook owner wants a small machine with the same functionality of their PC or notebook, complete with USB ports and hard keyboard. They dont want a tablet. Also, you act as if the tablet hasnt been available until now. Companies like archos have had media tablets on the market for years now.

Look Jagi, i just think the use and comparison of the netbook was both imsplaced and unneccesary.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top