Granted I didn't express it, but that wasn't meant as an absolute. Are there white people that can give a loving home to Black children definitley. Unfortunately there isn't a way to prohibit people like this adopting Black children. This is a problem!Yeah. Let 'em just fend for themselves...
Anyone who has had extensive contact with kids from homes without parents (or those who have parents who don't give a shit) knows that this is wrong as up falling rain.
NOW, I AM NOT DEFENDING THE PSYCHO CULT MEMBER ON THE COURT. SHE should maybe not have been allowed to adopt ANY kids... but in general, I disagree.
A white girl was the MOST DEDICATED teacher at the last school I quit, back in my save the world days. If someone cares, let them care; most of the black folk I worked with damn sure didn't give a rat's ass, and apparently could afford $300 gym shoes, but not a package of condoms.
Facts often suck.
Cheers.
Mmhh, I don't think I'm being ignored or that nobody has commentary to reply with. There is so much being posted in this thread it is HARD to keep up!!! I try to go back and catch up within two hours of my posts and I STILL miss so much. Somebody will reply to something that I missed and I'll jump back to where that came from and it is an entire page(s) of shyt I missed. I would be living a fcuking sad life if I cared about my posts being ignored or not interacted with. Not looking for comebacks, if anybody reads this and has a mental conversation with themselves or brings this up in conversation with their peers then my job is done!Notice how little attention this commentary seems to be getting?
It's not because you are being ignored.
It's because nobody has a comeback to this.
I suggest this is exemplary of why Democrats are ineffective.
Excellent analysis. However, I have an issue with “pro-corporate pro-Israel” line. They’re the same thing because they’re the same entity. It’s a Janus of American hegemony and “foreign policy”.I don't see it as a problem. Trump threw plenty of Red meat to his various constituents. White people. Anti-Dei. Anti- trans (trans military ban), Anti-environment, Billionaires, Pro-israel and anti forever wars.Pro tarrifs but anti-tax.LOL trump said it all he just was lying. It's easy for him because it doesn't have to make sense.
You are not going to have a unified party heading into an election with no democratic incumbent. Trump can't run again and he has made the party super vulnerable so for most of the high level democrats this is their shot at the presidency. Also, the base of the party is waking up to the pro-corporate pro-israel wing that is cool with war and no health insurance as long as they can pump fake at gay and trans rights as their issues. The funny shit is they call the socialist democrats the far left but they are way more focused on economic issues that affect all people, workers rights that affect all people.
The hard core pro-israeli corporate funded Democratic leadership if they win it will disenfranchise the base especially after four years of this shit. If a Kamala or Newsome get the ticket we probably won't see any major change. If the Democratic socialist side wins will the democratic mainline may not support. I hope we get a real solution not a Van Jones suck a little dick to get a little money solution. I think we have to see how the democratic coalition works out. We may pick up some anti-israel anti-war folks on the Right.
I could tell he looks just like his mama, but he’s a funny guy
Trump’s Board of Peace plans to grant itself sweeping immunity, documents show
The four-page resolution, labeled “sensitive but unclassified”, extends broad protections to every member of the Board of Peace and its administrative affiliate, the office of the high representative (OHR), as well as to the Palestinian technocrats, international military forces and nonresident contractors lined up to perform work in Gaza. It defines legal processes from which they would have immunity as “any arrest, detention or legal proceedings in the courts or other entities in Gaza”.
It is unclear if the document is attempting to relieve the Board of Peace and its affiliates from prosecution in international courts, in addition to potential claims in Gaza.
The Board of Peace’s chair, Donald Trump, would have the right to waive someone’s legal immunity, pending majority support from his peace board, the June 2026 draft resolution states.
The seven-member “executive board” that leads the Board of Peace includes Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner; special envoy Steve Witkoff; the president’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles; and his national security adviser, Marco Rubio. Though countries have pledged billions, most have not yet transferred funds to support its work in Gaza and no major contracts have been issue.
![]()
Trump’s Board of Peace plans to grant itself sweeping immunity, documents show
Draft resolution seeks to shield board members and security forces from potential prosecution for work in Gazawww.theguardian.com