"If your daddy aint the assistant coach and the team president aint your godfather???
Tell em to f**k off and pay you." -----This is what you said and it makes no sense.
So what , his father is an assistant coach, what does that have to do with anything? & that 'team president' comment is random, what does that have to do with giving the team a 113 million discount, huh?
You just said that because you want to play both sides, you want to talk about ownership undercover payments like that's a good thing while praising Jalen Brunson's discount because his father is assistant coach and his godfather is team president.
Bro, make it make sense! That's some 'playing both sides' logic.
I have no idea what you arguing about because I AGREE with you - only reminding you that it HAS worked so people WILL risk it.l
My point is unless you literally got BLOOD in that front office? Don't do it!
Unless the owner has PROVEN to you and your agent and manager to be SOLID? Don't do it.
All the examples that I have heard that this has worked? It was that type of specific relationship.
So I can't LIE and say it doesn't happen and every owner is a liar
But I would always ASSUME that they were.
Like with anything there are situations where the player is willing to take that risk.
I would NEVER advise to do it.
But I have to also acknowledge that it has been done successfully in the past.
And in Brunson's case, Duncan's case, Dirk, Tom Brady...it worked.
Those are outliers.
But these ae ATHLETES. They are always going to take that risk and bet on themeselves and want that legend tha they "sacrificed"
which is bullsh*t cause these owners GOT THAT MONEY
Its not both sides. Its just stating the REALITY of the situation.
Its complicated because certain cases it COULD work and the risk is worth it and some people CARE about "legacy narratives" that they gave EVERYTHING for the team.