Iran vs Israel/US: 6/21 USA bombed 3 nuclear plants in Iran, ceasefire agreed 6/24(iran restocking and retooling)..Israel looking to attack again, smh

Consequences of the US entering war with Iran & Zionist regime’s intentions behind starting this war​

Foad Izadi, Associate Professor of American Studies, Tehran universityJune 19, 2025
48356.jpg

In this interview, Foad Izadi, Associate Professor of American Studies at Tehran university, explains how a direct US military involvement against Iran could lead to devastating troop losses, economic turmoil, and legal crises, while exposing Israel’s true goal: Fragmenting Iran. Yet instead of weakening the country, the aggression has only fueled unprecedented national unity against foreign threats.
Escalation of human costs for the US in Case of direct military involvement

According to American sources themselves, the US has over 50,000 troops stationed across ten bases in the region, many of which are located very close to Iran’s borders. Some are situated along the Persian Gulf, while others are slightly farther away — yet still significantly closer than the Zionist regime. Given this proximity, Iran’s various ballistic missiles can easily reach these bases, and the short distance makes intercepting these missiles extremely difficult. An Iranian missile can strike these bases within just 3 to 5 minutes.

Even in the occupied territories (Israel), where a multi-layered missile defense system has been developed over years, a significant number of Iranian missiles would still penetrate. How, then, could US bases — which lack such defensive systems — possibly withstand such attacks?

As a result, 50,000 American soldiers are within range of Iran’s highly advanced ballistic missiles. This number — 50,000 — matches the total casualties the US suffered over 12 years in the Vietnam War. In this region, however, thousands of American troops could be killed within just a few days. This would be an unbearable cost for the US. One of the key reasons Washington has avoided direct military engagement so far is precisely this fear of massive troop losses in the region.

By entering this war directly, the US would face two major problems:

  1. Iran would have the opportunity to target these stationed troops.
  2. Domestically, the US Congress holds the constitutional authority to declare war. Even now, before any major escalation, there is significant congressional opposition to direct US involvement.
The statement by Imam Khamenei in his second televised address to the Iranian people, in which he said, "Of course, the Americans who are familiar with the policies of this region know that the US entering in this matter [war] is 100% to its own detriment. The damage it will suffer will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter. The harm the US will suffer will definitely be irreparable if they enter this conflict militarily," is an expert assessment, and the Americans themselves are well aware of this reality.

This is why Trump, despite his bluster, has repeatedly stated that the US is not officially involved — though he occasionally slips up. For example, in a June 17 tweet, he wrote, "The skies of Iran are completely under our control." The use of the word "our" is telling, as it reveals that the attack on Iran is a joint US-Israeli project, even as other White House officials have denied this in official statements.

Economic consequences of escalating tensions and US involvement

If this imposed war on Iran escalates, tensions will rise, and there will be significant economic repercussions. Oil prices have already surged dramatically. A direct US-Iran conflict would further destabilize the global economy, harming America itself. The US has struggled with inflation over the past three years, and one of Trump’s key economic promises was to reduce it. A regional war — and the resulting spike in oil prices — would exacerbate inflation severely.

Political and legal consequences of US entry into war

In March, the head of US intelligence agencies testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee, presenting the annual report of the US intelligence community. The report made three key points about Iran’s nuclear program:

  1. Iran does not possess a nuclear bomb.
  2. Iran has no program to produce a nuclear bomb.
  3. Iranian officials have not decided to build a nuclear bomb.
This was the assessment of US intelligence agencies just three months ago. Similarly, the Director-General of the IAEA stated in a CNN interview that there is no evidence Iran intends to produce a nuclear bomb. Therefore, there is no legal justification for attacking a country that — according to both the IAEA and US intelligence agencies — has no intention of building nuclear weapons.

Public opinion and US entry into this war

Global public opinion, already outraged by the 19 months of genocide in Gaza, sees that the Zionists are trying to instigate a new large-scale war in Iran. They understand that an Israeli attack on Iran would be impossible without US support — particularly since the fighter jets conducting operations against Iran require mid-air refueling, which is provided by US tanker aircraft. It has recently been announced that additional US refueling planes are being deployed to the region.

The global pro-Palestine movement, deeply angered by the genocide, recognizes that Iran’s "crime" is its support for the Palestinian cause — and they will stand with Iran. They understand that the Iranian people, like the people of Gaza, are victims of Zionist war criminals who have slaughtered over 60,000 in Gaza and now seek to repeat those atrocities in Iran.

Thus, direct US entry into this war would impose heavy costs — economically, politically, legally, and in terms of global public opinion. Even Trump and other US officials are aware of this, which is why they have not officially declared involvement.

True goal of Zionist regime and the US in launching this war

Recent interviews with Netanyahu and other Israeli officials reveal that the real objective of this war is the overthrow of the Islamic Republic and the disintegration of Iran. Initially, the focus was on Iran’s nuclear program, but it was always clear that the nuclear issue was never the real concern. The problem, for them, is Iran itself — and their desire to break it apart.

The reason is simple: As long as a major country like Iran — with its population, human capital, and natural resources — exists, it will remain a rival to Israel and the US It does not matter what government rules Iran. While the Islamic Republic is particularly unfavorable to them, they know that any government in Iran would inevitably adopt a nationalist stance and pursue independence.

This is why they seek Iran’s disintegration. They know that over the past four decades, the Islamic Republic has been the force preserving Iran’s territorial integrity. Their goal is to topple the Islamic Republic, leading either to a fractured, feudal-style rule or a weak central government in Tehran that would facilitate the country’s breakup.

Many in Iran have recognized this. As reflected in the Leader’s message, Iranian officials were engaged in negotiations, with no indication that Iran intended to take any drastic action. The Foreign Minister was set to continue talks in Oman on Sunday, entering a sixth round of negotiations with Steve Wittkopf—but this war began just two days prior. Even Trump tweeted: "The Israelis killed those who were negotiating with us." No civilized government kills those it is negotiating with — except the US and Israel.

It must be said that what Netanyahu predicted in his interviews did happen: The Iranian people took to the streets. But instead of division, they united —against Netanyahu. He inadvertently strengthened Iran’s national unity to a degree unseen since Saddam’s imposed war on Iran. Saddam’s attack had been a surprise, and this Zionist regime’s aggression carried the same element of shock. Netanyahu is today’s Saddam, and his attack has had the same effect on Iranian society and global public opinion as Saddam’s did —except Netanyahu’s global image, due to 19 months of genocide, is far worse.

Thus, the Leader’s remarks about the Iranian people’s response were entirely accurate — and mark the failure of the Zionist regime’s plot in this regard.

The potential direct involvement of the U.S. in a war with Iran carries catastrophic consequences—from massive military losses and economic turmoil to political and legal backlash. With 50,000 American troops vulnerable to Iran’s advanced missiles, the human cost could surpass the Vietnam War in days. Meanwhile, rising oil prices and inflation would further strain an already fragile U.S. economy. Legally, no justification exists for attacking Iran, as even U.S. intelligence denies any nuclear weapons intent. Behind this conflict lies Israel’s true aim: to dismantle Iran, knowing its strength challenges their dominance. Yet, instead of dividing Iran, the aggression has only unified its people against this blatant aggression.

(The views expressed in this article are author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of Khamenei.ir.)
 
So these folks are really different


Israel scared to come outta bunkers and shelters and these folks are partying like it’s nothing



 
Anyone noticed that Iran been sending more love taps during the day time. Where’s it much easier to strike civilians but they haven’t been really doing that.

The aim of their strike been accurate as thee fuck
 
So where does this leave Israel, if true?



BREAKING: A high-ranking Israeli official, speaking on the condition of anonimity, says Iran can likely sustain the current rate of missile fire at Israel for 'possibly as long as 5 months', provided that their missile launchers are not destroyed – NBC”
won't be surprised if it's actually more than that !

something to keep in mind those countries facing heavy economic sanctions (Iran, North Korea) have no choice but to build almost everything by themselves , they ain't part of the global trade which means -> if needed they just need to accelerate their production and they're good !

with Israelis it's the opposite they rely on western subcontractors for their missiles which means -> delay !

Palestinians from Gaza have their own military-industrial complex and it's still functioning -> RPGs Yasin 105 keep coming on that battlefield
 

During those good old days when Israelis decided that it was time to invade Lebanon just for fun they had all their military branches involved
infantry, aviation and navy doing coastal bombardment .... until 2006

The Hezbollah almost sunk one of those Israeli corvettes the INS Hanit that day

"An investigation found that the missile, likely a Chinese-made C-802 anti-ship cruise missile, successfully hit its target because officials didn’t believe that Hezbollah had such sophisticated technology, and didn’t turn on anti-missile systems capable of defending against it."
:lol:

The Times of Israel

The Hezbollah has serious anti-ship capabilities and western powers better keep that shit in mind cuz I bet the Hezbollah can now sink something bigger than a simple corvette !
 
won't be surprised if it's actually more than that !

something to keep in mind those countries facing heavy economic sanctions (Iran, North Korea) have no choice but to build almost everything by themselves , they ain't part of the global trade which means -> if needed they just need to accelerate their production and they're good !

with Israelis it's the opposite they rely on western subcontractors for their missiles which means -> delay !

Palestinians from Gaza have their own military-industrial complex and it's still functioning -> RPGs Yasin 105 keep coming on that battlefield

Exactly, Israel has used a significant amount of resources on Gaza. Trump fucked up the supply chain with his tariffs. Iran has been stacking for decades. While we have inventory we are in no position to help Israel. Trump has been told that, thus no decision for two weeks and talks of one big bomb strike, which would be useless without following that with a ground assault.
 


Iran​



Summary

Table of Contents





Tomas Pueyo
After Israel’s attack on Iran, the big question is: What will happen in Iran? Will the regime fall? If so, how? What will other superpowers do? To answer these questions, we must first understand why Israel and Iran are the way they are. You can read the articles on Israel here, here, here, and here. For Iran, two maps capture the essence.

Two Maps That Explain Iran​


The first shows us that Iran is in the middle of everything. Throughout its history, it has confronted superpowers to its west like Babylon, Greece, Rome, the Ottoman Empire (now Turkey), the British Empire, the US… To its north, Russia. To its northeast, it has suffered dozens of invasions from nomadic people, the most famous of which were the Mongols. Nowadays, we must add Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan.

And for all these civilizations to communicate over land, they must pass through either Iran or the small gap between the Caspian Sea and the Ural Mountains in Russia (red arrows on the map). Iran is in the middle of a highway, with dozens of powers interested in controlling it.

This is the second map:


Source
Iran is a mountain fortress. Here’s another visualization of Iran’s topography:


Source
The ramifications of these two facts—a fortress in the middle of a highway—have determined a lot of Iran’s history, its present, and its future.

1. A Mountain Fortress​

Although Iran is exposed to all these external threats given its location, it’s huge. With 1.7M km2 and a population of 90M people, it is 70% larger and has more population than Afghanistan and Iraq combined. If Afghanistan was hard for the US to control, imagine what it would be like to invade Iran.

Because, like Afghanistan, Iran is well protected from foreign invaders by its mountains, deserts, and seas.


The Zagros are a huge mountain range that protects Iran to its west. To the north and south, there are mountains and seas that protect the country from invasions. To the east, it has deserts and mountains too, and farther east they become the Afghani / Pakistani Hindu Kush, an even taller mountain range. The main opening is to the northeast, where many invasions of Steppe peoples came from, like the Mongols. But even there, mountains and deserts make it hard to access.
This is what the Zagros looks like:


Invade that
Interestingly, the Zagros Mountains created nearby Mesopotamia.


Mesopotamia is a foreland basin, as I described here: a depression formed by the weight of the mountains nearby.
Mesopotamia, of course, is one of the first places where civilization emerged, because the banks of the Tigris & Euphrates rivers are so fertile. Very tempting for Persians:

  • On plains, people tend to settle down, establish civilizations, and get rich.
  • Mountains prevent people from establishing similarly stable and prosperous civilizations. Given their isolation from one valley to the other, they also remain violent for longer. The lower fertility of their lands means more roaming lifestyles. All these factors push them to covet the wealth of the civilizations on the plains.
While it’s difficult for a lowland people to attack through mountains, it is easier for a

mountain-based people to descend onto the plains. This dichotomy between mountain people and plains people was evident as early as the Babylonian / Median times, around 600 BC:


In light brown, the Babylonian Empire. Notice how it follows Mesopotamia (the two rivers of Tigris and Euphrates) and covers the Levant, too. In green, the Median Kingdom. Notice how it covers most of today’s Iran, plus parts of Armenia and Turkey on the western side, and Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, and Pakistan on the eastern side. Source.
Soon after, the Achaemenids from Persia conquered Mesopotamia:


Note how the capitals of Pasargadae, Persepolis, and Ecbatana were in the Zagros mountains. Susa is just at their feet. Source.
Over Iran’s history, the Persian mountains and Mesopotamia were frequently united:


Most of the time, the union came from Persian invasions (Achaemenids, Parthians, Sassanids, Seljuk, Mongols, Safavid), but a few times, the invasions went the other way: Iran has been invaded five times from Mesopotamia, by the Akkadians, Assyrians, Greeks, Arabs, and the British in WW2. Although this sounds like a lot, note that since the Greek invasion (330 BC), Iran has only successfully been invaded from Mesopotamia twice in the last 2,300 years, in both cases while being hugely overpowered.The Romans tried for 5-10 centuries and failed. Iraq’s Saddam Hussein learned the hard way that this country is unassailable, during its eight years of war with Iran between 1980 and 1988.

Iran was successfully invaded seven more timesvia another path: the Central Asian steppes.


There are a couple of other paths that successful invaders have taken: Russia invaded through the Central Asian steppes and the Caucasus in 1941. Hotak Afghans invaded through the eastern deserts. But they only remained in power for a decade.
Invasions from the steppe basically stopped once gunpowder was invented and horse-mounted steppe warriors could be defeated. But there’s just desert or steppe there, so not much wealth to be gathered for Iranians.

The rest of Iran is well protected. To the northwest, there are the mountains of Anatolia. Farther north, the very tall Caucasus makes it nearly impenetrable. None of these are very valuable terrains.

Persians have never expanded through the seas to the north (Caspian) and south (Persian Gulf) because given its size and position as a land crossroad, Persia had to develop strong land armies. That investment prevented seafaring investments and expansion.

To the east are Iran’s deserts of Darsh-e Kavir and Darsh-e Lut, where some of the highest temperatures on Earth have been recorded:


Beyond these deserts are some mountain ranges, and then the even taller Hindu Kush mountains. These form excellent buffers, but provide very little wealth. You don’t go to Afghanistan to strike it rich, and Afghans are not usually rich enough to conquer Iran.

In summary, one of the big consequences of Iran’s geography is that the country is quite exposed to foreign attacks and invasions, but generally well protected, mainly thanks to its mountains and deserts. On top of this, it’s surrounded by pretty worthless terrain—mostly mountains and deserts, except in Mesopotamia to its west, making it the only natural expansion route for Iran.

Unfortunately for Iran, these mountains and deserts don’t just protect it, they also trap it. Invading its neighbors is a nightmare, as logistics for big armies over big mountain ranges and deserts is very difficult. It’s not a coincidence that so many invasions came from steppe warriors in the northeast: Their nomadic lifestyle allowed them to travel with their food (mainly horses and sheep). To the west, Mesopotamia is very close, but as Iran discovered in its eight-year war with the smaller Iraq, it simply could not muster the logistics to beat its neighbor: Resupplying a huge army over the Zagros mountains is so hard!

Another consequence of Iran’s geography is its wealth—or rather lack thereof.

2. Iran’s Chronic Poverty​

In more temperate areas like the US, Europe, or East Asia, few people live in mountains because they’re too cold and make transportation too expensive. But Iran is very warm and dry because of its latitude.


Iran is on the latitudes of global deserts—there because all the air that rises from the equator because of heat carries moisture with it, that becomes rain as the air keeps going up, and the resulting dry air falls down in these red regions, creating high density areas that are hard to displace. Since this air is dry, these regions are dry, too.
Temperatures can be scorching hot, like in the deserts we saw pictures of before:


That means mountains are the best place for people to live.


More specifically, Iranians live mostly in valleys nested between mountains.
High elevations are cooler, making temperatures comfortable. Mountains catch water from the wind, necessary for agriculture and living. We can see it in this picture of Tehran, the capital of Iran:


Here’s a picture of the city and its mountains:


The mountains behind Tehran capture rain and conserve some of it in the form of snow
We can see that generalized in this map of precipitation vs topography:


Notice how the deserts of Dasht-e Kavir and Dasht-e Lut have basically no rain
Mountains mean poverty, as they make transportation and infrastructure costs exorbitant. And as we just saw, trade is extremely sensitive to transportation costs, so mountains mean little trade and little wealth building. We saw something similar in Mexicoand Brazil. This means Iran is structurally poor.


Between 1 AD and the Industrial Revolution, Iran / Persia was poorer than other local empires, such as the Romans (here, represented by Italy), the Egyptians, and the Mesopotamians (here, Iraq).

3. Ethnic Diversity​

Another consequence of the high transportation costs and low levels of trade caused by mountains is that communities remain separate, bringing ethnic diversity—Balkanization. Iran is a highly diverse country.


The orange parts are the Persians. Purple to the northwest and northeast are the Kurds. The green in the northwest are Azeris. The light brown to the southwest are Arabs. The Balochis are in the southeast. The rest are smaller groups. Notice how Persians are in the middle mostly, but spread out. Peripheries are full of ethnic minorities. The emptiness of white highlights how little population lives in the deserts. Source.
Persians account for ~60% of the population, mostly in the mountainous heartlands. But the entire periphery is sprinkled with other ethnicities. Azeris make up about 15% of the population, living mostly in the northwestern mountains close to Azerbaijan. Did you know there are more Azeris in Iran than in Azerbaijan?!


Dark blue: Azeri majority. Light blue: minority. Source.
Kurds in the northwest (and northeast!) account for ~7% of the Persian population, and ~25% of the world’s Kurdish population.


There are Arabs in the southwest, in the Khuzestan lowlands. These are quite special because:

First, this is part of Mesopotamia!
Second, the locals are Arab, like Iraqis!


Map of languages in the region vs topography
Third, this is where most of Iran’s oil fields lie!


There’s a ton of oil there. Iran is the 3rd country in oil reserves in the world and 2nd in gas reserves. Source.
And there are more! Baluchis, in the southeast, also straddle Afghanistan and Pakistan.


Gilak and Mazandaranis on the Caspian coast, Tourki, Tati… You can imagine this is not good for the country’s unity.

Of course, religion exacerbates the problem, as most Iranians are Shia, but Kurds, Baluchis, and a few others are Sunni.


Source
Historically, the only way to handle this was with broad autonomy.

The Persian Empire represented the world's first superpower that was based on a model of tolerance and respect for other cultures and religions.History of Iran, Wikipedia
This is what you find in a country like Switzerland today. But it’s hard to keep such a diverse country unified. Frequently, it devolves into violence, like in the Balkans, Mexico, Afghanistan… So, as the tools of centralized control have developed over time, they have opened another alternative path to unity: surveillance, control, and suppression. This is one of the reasons why the Iranian state is so repressive and authoritarian.


The most shocking moment of Iranian repression for me was the death of Neda Agha‑Soltan, who was shot at a protest against the 2009 Presidential election by a member of the Basij government militia. You can watch here (graphic).
We’re now poised to understand the challenges of present-day Iran.

Iran’s Main Priorities​

Iran has five priorities.

Priority 1: Securing Borders​

Iran is in such a central position, and surrounded by so many powers, that its first priority is to secure its borders. This is mostly achieved already.

Going clockwise, starting with the border with Turkey:

  • Between Iran and Turkey are the Zagros. Of all the invasions Iran has suffered, none successfully used this path. On top of this, today this region is inhabited by Kurds on both sides of the border. They are hostile to Turkey, and would be unlikely to help in case of an invasion. Figuring out logistics through these mountains would be a nightmare, and Turkey is in no position to do that.
  • The northwest is well covered, with the tall Zagros and Alborz mountains and weak buffer states like Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. North of them is the even taller and more impenetrable Caucasus, which also has separatist movements, including the Chechens, Abkhazians, South Ossetians, Dagestanis, Ingush... If Russia has a hard time invading Ukraine over plains, imagine invading Iran over this. Impossible.
  • The Caspian sea could hardly see a successful attack from Russia either, since it would need to immediately climb the Alborz mountains, very unlikely to succeed.
  • To Iran’s northeast is Turkmenistan, which has 10% of Iran’s population, and is on the steppe—convenient when mounted warriors were all the rage, not great when it can be shelled at will from the mountains. The five Central Asia -stans together have a smaller population than Iran. The region between Turkmenistan and Iran is also desertic, making logistical support even harder.
  • Pakistan and Afghanistan are dirt poor, and separated from Iran’s heartland by ranges of mountains and impenetrable deserts. Only one invasion ever succeeded through this route, and that was during a time when Iran was extremely weak. Afghanistan and Pakistan can’t mount an attack here.
  • The sea to the south is pretty safe. First, because desertic mountains rise immediately from the coast. Second, because 40% of the world’s oil flows through this region, so the world’s maritime superpower (the US) wants to make sure it is safe and oil keeps flowing.
  • This leaves its southwest corner of Khuzestan as the only area that is somewhat exposed, especially given its oil, that this is where Iraq attacked in 1980, and that this is where five invasions succeeded in the past. Despite this, Iran can feel reasonably secure:
    • It’s marshland
    • Iran has a strong influence in Iraq
    • Iraq learned empirically that it can’t take that region
    • The US would prefer to keep the oil flowing than to take over this region
So Iran has achieved its primary goal of border security. If you hear people say “Maybe Israel and / or the US could put boots on the ground in Iran”, send them this article and tell them to stop smoking psychotropics.

Priority 2: Internal Unity​

Iran’s heartland is solidly made of Farsi-speaking Shia Persians. But its peripheries are all occupied by minorities that straddle neighboring countries. This can remain stable, but only as long as Iran’s security apparatus can project its power and violence. If it falters, Iran’s position will be precarious.

Foreign powers know this, so this is how they would try to weaken or topple Iranian power: By supporting separatists. At the height of US involvement in the Middle East, this was a serious risk, as the US had boxed Iran through its presence in Iraq to the west, Afghanistan to the east, and its alliance with Pakistan to the southeast. During their time there, the US did support separatist movements in the Arab Khuzestan, in Kurdistan, in Balochistan… Now that the US is out, it’s much less of a risk.

If I were Israel and I wanted to topple the Iranian government, I would ferociously attack its security apparatus, sow discord to provoke internal discontent, and support the bordering separatist movements.

Priority 3: Freedom from Foreign Interference​

The superpowers that can interfere in Iranian affairs are Russia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the US. Of those, Iran’s fears are first and foremost towards the US, because the US:

  • Used a puppet to control Iran before the Revolution of 1979.
  • Boxed Iran between enemies during its presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, and through its alliance with Pakistan.
  • Supported separatist movements in Iran.
  • Is a liberal democracy, while Iran is an authoritarian theocracy.
For all these reasons, Iran has not been able to find peace with the US. This is why it has pursued a nuclear weapons program.

Priority 4: Trade Oil​

Iran wants to trade its oil internationally, but its efforts are undermined by US sanctions, which are there because of Iran’s nuclear weapons. In turn, the lackluster economy causes internal dissent, which forces Iran to prop up its internal security even further.

Frankly, sometimes this is frustrating, because it feels like the US and Iran could just be more friendly and none of this would happen.

Priority 5: Project Power Towards the Mediterranean​

Iran would like to go back to its glory days when its influence reached the Mediterranean. This is one of the reasons why it had proxies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Gaza. Of those, Israel has exterminated its influence in Lebanon and Gaza, and Syria fell mostly due to Turkish support. Its only influence left is in Iraq.

Iran is rattled by this, but finds itself helpless in this situation for now.

Share

Takeaways​

Iran is basically impenetrable. Its only region at risk is the Arab Khuzestan to the southwest, but even that is relatively protected.

Its biggest threats are from the US and Israel:

  • The US can’t invade Iran, but the US has influenced the country too much in the recent past. The Iranian government fears being toppled, so it has been developing the nuclear bomb. The US has countered with sanctions, which have impoverished the country dramatically.
  • Israel will never invade Iran, but it has been able to negate Iran’s projection to the Mediterranean, and is an emerging power in the region. As of today, it constitutes Iran’s main risk, as Israel is eliminating Iran’s internal security forces, which could trigger internal dissent and separatism.
And this is the context of Israel’s bombing of Iran, why it’s attacking its nuclear arsenal and its internal security forces, and why it’s calling on the US to help.

But why is Iran against Israel in the first place?
What about Turkey? Saudi Arabia?
Why is it friendly with Russia?
Can it become friendly with the US?
What is the most likely outcome of this conflict?
What about the Iranian population? Do the people support the theocracy? What’s its role in this?

These are the questions I’m going to tackle in the premium article later this week. Subscribe to read it!

1
I’m only considering successful invasions here, defined as those that reached the capital, took it, and overthrew the existing rulers. I’ve included the Ghaznavids because, although they didn’t really reach a Persian capital, that’s partly because Iran was divided back then. They actually united most of Persia.
2
Persia was conquered by Arabs among other reasons because Persians were exhausted after one thousand years of wars with Roman empires. In WW2, Iran was completely overwhelmed by the combined power of the mighty British and Russians.
3
By the Parthians, Ghaznavid, Seljuks, Khwarazmians, Mongols, Timurids, and Soviets.
4
From Wikipedia: Between 12 and 23 million Azerbaijanis live in Iran, mainly in the northwestern provinces. Approximately 9.1 million Azerbaijanis are found in the Republic of Azerbaijan. A diaspora of over a million is spread throughout the rest of the world.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top