Facts
Trumps team coming for fanni willis...
- Thread starter totto
- Start date
Facts
Everything in her facial expressions say, pinned up sexual frustration. I bet she's a pure freak for a man who knows what he's doing.
I'd bend her over a desk or two.
I'd bend her over a desk or two.
Fanni's team is on it.
---
---
'Patently false': Georgia hearing sees brutal takedown of Trump co-defendant's lawyer
Fulton County Assistant District Attorney Adam Abbate suggested that a lawyer for one of Donald Trump's co-defendants should be hit with
Opinion | We learned a lot about Fani Willis last week. Absolutely none of it was relevant.
If the unnecessary and salacious sideshow of an investigation into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis sounds absurd, it’s because it is.
www.msnbc.com
Trump is corrupt af but a token "strong" single middle aged black female contradicting "don't need a man" but will pay to fck him ego diven DA is just as dangerous.
She'll more than likely not be disqualified bc the judge worked under her, but what she did and continued to do with the appearance of being unethical was just dumb not just unethical and like Trump just ego power driven and for that dumb power position ego emotional sexual decision to hire and pay to take trips to fck her boy toy she should be disqualified as it will conflict/contradict with situations in this Rico case. You basically prosecuting for some of the same things you're doing like not accounting for a legal or illegal transaction evidence that could lead to guilt or not. So she can use it, but Trump and Co will ague they can't?
The catch twenty two is if she is disqualified, however Trump and his even dumber cronies will more than likely get off for the election interference.
Really the dumb part was, she might get Trump and co, but opened herself up to tax investigation which I'll be shocked if they don't get her on that down the road and especially if Trump gets in office.
Ol`Judge Joe actually explains it pretty good here:
She'll more than likely not be disqualified bc the judge worked under her, but what she did and continued to do with the appearance of being unethical was just dumb not just unethical and like Trump just ego power driven and for that dumb power position ego emotional sexual decision to hire and pay to take trips to fck her boy toy she should be disqualified as it will conflict/contradict with situations in this Rico case. You basically prosecuting for some of the same things you're doing like not accounting for a legal or illegal transaction evidence that could lead to guilt or not. So she can use it, but Trump and Co will ague they can't?
The catch twenty two is if she is disqualified, however Trump and his even dumber cronies will more than likely get off for the election interference.
Really the dumb part was, she might get Trump and co, but opened herself up to tax investigation which I'll be shocked if they don't get her on that down the road and especially if Trump gets in office.
Ol`Judge Joe actually explains it pretty good here:
My fiancé y’all.
George Washington took the teeth out of the mouths of Africans because his breath stank. Lets stop worrying about offending white people when they’re in the business of physically harming us.
I can tell a lot of yall just read headlines and don't actually read the articles.
She hired the dude because the person she actually wanted for the job turned it down cause he didn't want to deal with the bullshit from Trump supporters.
The dude took a PAY CUT to take the role so the idea he was doing it make extra is stupid.
All the rest being said in here is about her is just the usual BGOL Black woman bullshit.
She hired the dude because the person she actually wanted for the job turned it down cause he didn't want to deal with the bullshit from Trump supporters.
The dude took a PAY CUT to take the role so the idea he was doing it make extra is stupid.
All the rest being said in here is about her is just the usual BGOL Black woman bullshit.
The brother took a significant pay cut. If we gonna be honest, that’s probably why he couldn’t work with Fani on those trips. The financial strain made him impotent.
Someone in her position not using a amex platinum or some reward miles card seems shady as hell, but to be fair all these politicians do it.
You can see the vitriol hate in their responses.
Coontastic.
OP on suicide watch!!!
Delete this bullshit!
jmo
Delete this bullshit!
jmo
Last edited:
Most brothers on here can tell who comment who was raised by a simlar momma contradicting, "I don't need no man" but just pay a married man to be a boy toy, Fani type woman.
Folks can praise and be quick to say someone bashing this black women, but the black women in power with dumb emotional decisions with egos as big as trumps deserve the negative outcomes.
This woman really thought or let her ego think she could get away with the same unethical money, secret lover hiring and sex things that whites do- while prosecuting powerful white folks with any repercussions?
Shyt ain't got nothing to do with black woman bashing... the dumb ass emotional ego to do this and try to double down actually bashes black educated woman who hope to be in her position who would never lead and continue to lead with her pssy and money for D knowing it would come to.light while prosecuting a case like this while disrespecting the very man and or men she goes out of her to be with and pay for rendezvous d with.
With no hard evidence papertrail (smartest thing she did btw), we should just believe her bc she's a strong don't need a man black woman? Look up that teacher's rico case that she prosecuted years back with all those black teachers she got locked up.
None of their witness testimony was believed without hard evidence... as she said "a witness testimony is fact" (when only she is the witness right?) Just connecting of dots should be guilt in Fani's book only when she's not the criminal defendant... exactly what she's saying that she paid it all back in the exact cash it cost and believe her and do not connect any dots she where she could be lying.
She had more blatant contradiction where old videos show her saying when she ran on ethics she said officials like her if elected should not be paying or sleeping with coworkers so she certainly knew better, but power and sex is a hellvua a combo drug.
And so now since she's a black woman with a slam dunk to get trump locked up we suppose to just support this disingenuous strong token black woman politican whos also prosecuting and locking up black folk with her same contradictions. FOH.
Folks can praise and be quick to say someone bashing this black women, but the black women in power with dumb emotional decisions with egos as big as trumps deserve the negative outcomes.
This woman really thought or let her ego think she could get away with the same unethical money, secret lover hiring and sex things that whites do- while prosecuting powerful white folks with any repercussions?
Shyt ain't got nothing to do with black woman bashing... the dumb ass emotional ego to do this and try to double down actually bashes black educated woman who hope to be in her position who would never lead and continue to lead with her pssy and money for D knowing it would come to.light while prosecuting a case like this while disrespecting the very man and or men she goes out of her to be with and pay for rendezvous d with.
With no hard evidence papertrail (smartest thing she did btw), we should just believe her bc she's a strong don't need a man black woman? Look up that teacher's rico case that she prosecuted years back with all those black teachers she got locked up.
None of their witness testimony was believed without hard evidence... as she said "a witness testimony is fact" (when only she is the witness right?) Just connecting of dots should be guilt in Fani's book only when she's not the criminal defendant... exactly what she's saying that she paid it all back in the exact cash it cost and believe her and do not connect any dots she where she could be lying.
She had more blatant contradiction where old videos show her saying when she ran on ethics she said officials like her if elected should not be paying or sleeping with coworkers so she certainly knew better, but power and sex is a hellvua a combo drug.
And so now since she's a black woman with a slam dunk to get trump locked up we suppose to just support this disingenuous strong token black woman politican whos also prosecuting and locking up black folk with her same contradictions. FOH.
Uh oh.
www.ajc.com
Trump lawyers: Cellphone data raises questions about start of Willis-Wade relationship
Nathan Wade appeared to make at least 35 visits to the Hapeville neighborhood where Fani Willis was living before the district attorney hired him to lead Fulton County’s election interference prosecution, according to cellphone data included in a court submission filed Friday.
Uh oh.
Trump lawyers: Cellphone data raises questions about start of Willis-Wade relationship
Nathan Wade appeared to make at least 35 visits to the Hapeville neighborhood where Fani Willis was living before the district attorney hired him to lead Fulton County’s election interference prosecution, according to cellphone data included in a court submission filed Friday.
I was wondering if there would be cellphone data introduced.
two prosecutors didn't anticipate cell phone records wouldn't be introduced? was this not in discovery?
I'd think they would. I mean they do this for a living. I know they had refused to give certain records over like bank records. He said he had been to her house around 10 times and this puts it at 35 and supposedly one or two overnight stays. They are asking people to remember stuff from over a 1-2 years ago though. I'd be interested to know the length of time of each stay. Perhaps picking her up or dropping something off vs a visit wasn't counted. Or maybe he just knows someone else in her neighborhood, but I'm not one of those folks who are 100% convinced they are being truthful about their relationship, I just don't think her giving him the job was for personal enrichment or to financially benefit either one of them, considering how it pays. Plus I don't think it has any bearing on Trump’s case. That said, I hope they aren't lying and don't end up losing their careers over this.
Uh oh.
Trump lawyers: Cellphone data raises questions about start of Willis-Wade relationship
Nathan Wade appeared to make at least 35 visits to the Hapeville neighborhood where Fani Willis was living before the district attorney hired him to lead Fulton County’s election interference prosecution, according to cellphone data included in a court submission filed Friday.
Please don't tell me two prosecutors got on the stand and perjured themselves
It has absolutely nothing to do with Trump's case legally but in the court of public opinion unfortunately it has everything to do with his since people are looking for any confirmation they can find of the Democrats being corrupt and to validate their bullshit conspiracy theories.
If his team succeeds in having them removed or making them appear corrupt it would be a huge blow to their case no matter how strong the evidence.
Just as unfortunate is how all if this is probably further tainted some potential jurors ahead of his trial.
Yeah comments say they are just trying to dirty them up or be able to say the judge didn’t allow them to submit the evidence.
I'm probably late on this but I didn't realize that, in the event she is removed, her entire office would also be removed from the case and be reassigned to someone who would have to begin all over essentially:
www.nbcnews.com
By Dareh Gregorian
If a Georgia judge signs off on a bid to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from her racketeering case against former President Donald Trump and numerous co-defendants, it could delay any trial until well after the 2024 election — and possibly scuttle the charges altogether, legal experts told NBC News.
For a new prosecutor to take over the sprawling 15-defendant case would be a “massive undertaking,” said Amy Lee Copeland, a defense lawyer and former federal prosecutor in Georgia, adding that the theoretical new prosecutor could decide to amend the charges or even “decide not to pursue it.”
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee held an evidentiary hearing on Thursday and Friday over misconduct allegations that have been aimed at Willis and the special prosecutor she appointed to the case, Nathan Wade. Michael Roman, one of Trump’s co-defendants, alleged the pair engaged in an “improper, clandestine personal relationship” and “have enriched themselves off this case.”
Willis and Wade have denied any wrongdoing. McAfee has not yet ruled on the motion, but said earlier this week, “Because I think it’s possible that the facts alleged by the defendant could result in disqualification, I think an evidentiary hearing must occur to establish the record on those core allegations.”
If McAfee were to grant Roman’s motion, it would grind the case — which currently does not have a scheduled trial date — to a halt. If Willis were to be disqualified, her entire office would be as well, Copeland said.
Under a 2022 Georgia law, when a district attorney is disqualified, the case is referred to the executive director of the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia, who is tasked with finding another prosecutor for the case.
“If Judge McAfee signs an order disqualifying DA Willis, it becomes incumbent upon me to select a special prosecutor and appoint a special prosecutor,” the council’s executive director, Pete Skandalakis, told NBC News.
Skandalakis, a former district attorney, said his office would “begin by looking for who has the resources and capability — not only personnel and expertise but also financial” to handle such a case.
“The bigger the case, the more expense is involved,” he said. He would also be mindful of “geography — who’s closest to the site” — and “who has an extremely high caseload and who has a light caseload.”
“You’re looking for someone who’s a neutral arbiter and can make decisions based upon the evidence,” and ideally someone who wants to take the case, Skandalakis said.
“As I read the statute, a DA cannot refuse an appointment, but it’s best to find somebody willing to take on the assignment,” he said.
In addition to various DA’s offices, Skandalakis could choose to keep the case himself, assign it to the state attorney general’s office or appoint a private lawyer as special counsel, but he said financial constraints make the last option unlikely.
“If I were to appoint a private lawyer, the statute constrains me to pay the hourly rate of an elected district attorney, which is about $70 an hour, and I can’t pay for him or her to hire an investigator” or other help, he said.
He said whoever takes over the case would be able to use the investigative work that’s already been completed by the DA’s office, but they’d also have the ability to do additional investigative work and to use — or discard — some or all of Willis’ indictment.
“You have to look at the case as if you’re starting from scratch,” he said.
Asked how politics could come into play in his potential search, Skandalakis, a Republican, said, “I think it would be disingenuous to say politics isn’t a part of any process, but I’m still looking for someone who could be neutral and could make their decision based on the evidence that’s available.”
J. Tom Morgan, a professor at Western Carolina University and a former DeKalb County district attorney, said any new prosecutor would likely “skinny” the case down to make it “a more manageable, triable case.” The current indictment is “a pig’s breakfast, a total slop,” he said.
But, he added, it would take time for a new prosecutor to get up to speed and then trim it down. “Ms. Willis’ office has been on this case for two and a half years,” he said.
There could be other delays as well. If Willis were to appeal a disqualification ruling, Skandalakis said he would hold off on appointing a new prosecutor until the appeal was decided.
“If she wins the appeal, it wouldn’t make sense for me to appoint somebody and then it goes back to her, so we’d have to wait,” he said.
The disqualification statute does not set out a time table to act. Skandalakis said there would be no statute of limitation issues since the defendants have already been indicted.
Copeland said any lengthy delays could trigger individual speedy trial claims.
She added that history doesn’t indicate that the process of finding a new DA will move swiftly.
In July of 2022, Willis was disqualified from investigating Burt Jones, then a state senator who was running for lieutenant governor, as part of the Trump probe. The disqualification came after she hosted a fundraiser backing a Democratic candidate running for the same job.
That probe was then sent to the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council, which has yet to select a prosecutor to continue the investigation into the now-lieutenant governor. “This wouldn’t be faster,” Copeland said.
Skandalakis said that case has different issues and court-ordered constraints.
“The two are completely different animals,” he said.
What happens if Fulton County DA Fani Willis is disqualified from the Trump racketeering case?
If a judge disqualifies Willis, it would likely delay the case from going to trial this year — and could lead to the charges being tossed altogether.
What happens if Fulton County DA Fani Willis is disqualified from the Trump racketeering case?
If a judge disqualifies Willis, it would likely delay the case from going to trial this year — and could lead to the charges being tossed altogether.By Dareh Gregorian
If a Georgia judge signs off on a bid to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from her racketeering case against former President Donald Trump and numerous co-defendants, it could delay any trial until well after the 2024 election — and possibly scuttle the charges altogether, legal experts told NBC News.
For a new prosecutor to take over the sprawling 15-defendant case would be a “massive undertaking,” said Amy Lee Copeland, a defense lawyer and former federal prosecutor in Georgia, adding that the theoretical new prosecutor could decide to amend the charges or even “decide not to pursue it.”
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee held an evidentiary hearing on Thursday and Friday over misconduct allegations that have been aimed at Willis and the special prosecutor she appointed to the case, Nathan Wade. Michael Roman, one of Trump’s co-defendants, alleged the pair engaged in an “improper, clandestine personal relationship” and “have enriched themselves off this case.”
Willis and Wade have denied any wrongdoing. McAfee has not yet ruled on the motion, but said earlier this week, “Because I think it’s possible that the facts alleged by the defendant could result in disqualification, I think an evidentiary hearing must occur to establish the record on those core allegations.”
If McAfee were to grant Roman’s motion, it would grind the case — which currently does not have a scheduled trial date — to a halt. If Willis were to be disqualified, her entire office would be as well, Copeland said.
Under a 2022 Georgia law, when a district attorney is disqualified, the case is referred to the executive director of the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia, who is tasked with finding another prosecutor for the case.
“If Judge McAfee signs an order disqualifying DA Willis, it becomes incumbent upon me to select a special prosecutor and appoint a special prosecutor,” the council’s executive director, Pete Skandalakis, told NBC News.
Skandalakis, a former district attorney, said his office would “begin by looking for who has the resources and capability — not only personnel and expertise but also financial” to handle such a case.
“The bigger the case, the more expense is involved,” he said. He would also be mindful of “geography — who’s closest to the site” — and “who has an extremely high caseload and who has a light caseload.”
“You’re looking for someone who’s a neutral arbiter and can make decisions based upon the evidence,” and ideally someone who wants to take the case, Skandalakis said.
“As I read the statute, a DA cannot refuse an appointment, but it’s best to find somebody willing to take on the assignment,” he said.
In addition to various DA’s offices, Skandalakis could choose to keep the case himself, assign it to the state attorney general’s office or appoint a private lawyer as special counsel, but he said financial constraints make the last option unlikely.
“If I were to appoint a private lawyer, the statute constrains me to pay the hourly rate of an elected district attorney, which is about $70 an hour, and I can’t pay for him or her to hire an investigator” or other help, he said.
He said whoever takes over the case would be able to use the investigative work that’s already been completed by the DA’s office, but they’d also have the ability to do additional investigative work and to use — or discard — some or all of Willis’ indictment.
“You have to look at the case as if you’re starting from scratch,” he said.
Asked how politics could come into play in his potential search, Skandalakis, a Republican, said, “I think it would be disingenuous to say politics isn’t a part of any process, but I’m still looking for someone who could be neutral and could make their decision based on the evidence that’s available.”
J. Tom Morgan, a professor at Western Carolina University and a former DeKalb County district attorney, said any new prosecutor would likely “skinny” the case down to make it “a more manageable, triable case.” The current indictment is “a pig’s breakfast, a total slop,” he said.
But, he added, it would take time for a new prosecutor to get up to speed and then trim it down. “Ms. Willis’ office has been on this case for two and a half years,” he said.
There could be other delays as well. If Willis were to appeal a disqualification ruling, Skandalakis said he would hold off on appointing a new prosecutor until the appeal was decided.
“If she wins the appeal, it wouldn’t make sense for me to appoint somebody and then it goes back to her, so we’d have to wait,” he said.
The disqualification statute does not set out a time table to act. Skandalakis said there would be no statute of limitation issues since the defendants have already been indicted.
Copeland said any lengthy delays could trigger individual speedy trial claims.
She added that history doesn’t indicate that the process of finding a new DA will move swiftly.
In July of 2022, Willis was disqualified from investigating Burt Jones, then a state senator who was running for lieutenant governor, as part of the Trump probe. The disqualification came after she hosted a fundraiser backing a Democratic candidate running for the same job.
That probe was then sent to the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council, which has yet to select a prosecutor to continue the investigation into the now-lieutenant governor. “This wouldn’t be faster,” Copeland said.
Skandalakis said that case has different issues and court-ordered constraints.
“The two are completely different animals,” he said.
Has no jurisdiction over this case.
Okay home boy I didn't know Fani was kinfolk... That's a smart dumb line of kinfolk and it shows. I understand some of you muthaphkers will support a trash can if it has some pssy in it.
So now of course there are cell phone trackable records of the muthafkers lying. Even white boy at the 16:00min understand what a booth call is.
but these are the two idoit token black folks we want bringing down trump?
Now, I'd be shocked if they don't, at minimum lose their law license at max, jail time for perjury... just dumb shyt... just say yes, we were fking, it was a dumb move to hire and pay to keep fking, excuse yourself and regain our dignity later, and keeping getting your paper... now, this "strong" black woman that don't need a man (except this man judge to hope and pray he overlooks the lies against cell records and two witness) want to double down with white folks who got much more resources and support to play unfair.
Last edited:
Yep... Exactly why I said it aint not supporting a black woman, it's the fact that this black woman had this extraordinary opportunity and let her attitude ego and emotion sexual frustration fk it up ( She said she was in lonely place during them booty call days).Please don't tell me two prosecutors got on the stand and perjured themselves
And the more sad part is she could have still prevented herself from going through all of this, possible jail time now, by owning up and just stepping away with some dignity and then hit up the black church and black media victim circuit to get her dignity fully back.
***ALSO They got Wade's signed financial statements as well that shows all kind of inconsistencies he told under oath... Especially the non reporting of the cash. Next Fani's tax returns will be examined and I'll bet that 15k cash Fani said she had on hand, she did not report it.
But she fkd over those atlanta black teachers with that bs Rico charge imo so karma's a b*tch as they say.
Last edited:
and youre a cot damn idiot to boot.
Similar threads
