Republicans Enjoy Huge Lead Over Democrats in Midterms: Poll

While I do agree that we are fucked either way by the Democrats or the republicans, we're just fucked more by the Republicans. The Democrats will help trans people before they help us because trans people include white people. They will never solely do anything to help our group as black people as they should and could, even with a Dem Senate or even a Dem House

Then they should lose that Dem Senate and Dem House be forced to earn our votes!
 
Then they should lose that Dem Senate and Dem House be forced to earn our votes!
I hear what you're saying bro. I do. But we as black people are stuck between a racist as fuck GOP and a "Let's use Black people to get elected and then not do anything to help them scrape the shit off of them that we dumped on them - but Let's help Ukraine with billions."

If we withhold our votes the Racist as fuck side wins and that is a helluva lot worse for Black people.

The best we can do is start businesses to take advantage of the programs being implemented
 
Last edited:
Republicans Enjoy Huge Lead Over Democrats in Midterms: Poll

Republicans have opened up a substantial lead over Democrats ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, according to a new poll conducted in February among likely general election voters.

A poll from the Convention of States Action (COSA) in partnership with the Trafalgar Group showed Republicans enjoyed 54.4 percent support in the upcoming midterms, compared to just 41.9 percent for Democrats.

That represents a GOP lead of 12.5 percent over Democrats as the party is hoping to retake the House of Representatives and the Senate, allowing Republicans to stymie President Joe Biden's agenda.

The poll was conducted from February 2 to 6, among 1,073 likely general election voters. It had a margin of error of 2.99 percent.

The Trafalgar Group enjoys an A- rating from poll tracker FiveThirtyEight.

Just 3.7 percent of the respondents said they were undecided on their candidate preference in the 2022 elections.

While Republicans are aiming to block President Biden's agenda, the COSA/Trafalgar Group poll shows that most likely general election voters believe the GOP will achieve this goal if they win control of Congress.

When respondents were asked how confident they were that Republicans "will follow through on their promises to try to block or undo Biden's policies and agenda," 46.1 percent said they were very confident the GOP would do so.

A further 35 percent were somewhat confident that Republicans would block Biden's agenda, while 10.7 percent weren't very confident and 8.2 percent weren't confident at all.

There was a notable divide between Democrats and Republicans on the question of the GOP blocking Biden's agenda, however. Democrats were more certain that Republicans would do so, with 55.5 very confident and 24.7 percent somewhat confident. A further 9.9 percent weren't very confident and another 9.9 percent weren't confident at all.

By contrast, just 39.1 percent of Republicans were very confident a GOP-controlled Congress would stymie Biden's agenda, while 43.6 percent were somewhat confident of it. A further 9.8 percent of Republicans said they weren't very confident, but just 7.5 percent said they weren't confident at all.

Republican victories could see Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) return as Senate Majority Leader and Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy become Speaker of the House for the first time.

While the COSA/Trafalgar Group poll appears to be bad news for Democrats, FiveThirtyEight's estimate of the generic congressional ballot suggests the margins are much tighter. FiveThirtyEight analyzes a large number of polls and uses its own system of pollster ratings.

That tracker showed Republicans on 45.1 percent support in the midterm elections, compared to 42.6 percent for Democrats as of February 14. Both parties have seen their support rise in FiveThirtyEight's generic congressional ballot since late January, but the GOP continues to outpace President Biden's party.

If Republicans take one or both chambers of Congress in November, they will likely seek to prevent Biden from pressing forward with his agenda over the next two years, leading into the 2024 presidential election. The GOP may also initiate investigations into a number of matters.

Turns out this was all propaganda. Red wave petered out in the light of day. 14 page thread of falsehood competes with Cambridge Analytica & Russian bots.
 
Last edited:
Turns out this was all propaganda. Red wave petered out in the light if day. 14 page thread of falsehood competes with Cambridge Analytica & Russian bots.
Damn right it was propaganda. It's a wonder who pays attention to those bullshit ass propaganda ads about who's leading before the votes are even cast/counted?

They pinned all of their shit on the role versus Wade overturning and that ended up biting them in the ass. I tell the story a lot and I probably told it here

**

While an ex-girlfriend was going to John Carroll University, she got to know a girl in the dorm room next door named Rachel. Rachel was White and could either be cool or stuck up depending upon what day you spoke to her. I had spoken to Rachel on many issues before as well.

One day in the lunchroom a bunch of students were having a discussion about pro-life versus pro-choice. Rachel was very outspoken on the subject.

"Oh my God. How could a woman have an abortion? That's like the worst thing a woman could ever do. I don't think I could even be a friend of someone who had an abortion."

She went on a whole Pro-Life rant.

When everyone disbursed, I asked, "Rachel, do you really believe that shit?"

With a straight face she said, "Hell no. I've had three."

"My mother told me that no decent White man wants to marry a woman with someone else's kid. If you ever want to get married either swallow it or abort it."

She spoke to exactly what I stated earlier. Nobody wants to raise or pay for any one else's kid and every kid you have makes you less marketable in the dating world.

White women seem to understand that more than black women which is why white women make up more than 60% of the abortions, and probably closer to 80% of the abortions

**

Just like this political shit is about control, Republicans being about pro-life is about control as well. White people know that white people get a shit ton more abortions than everyone else

You think she's the only white girl whose mother told her something like that or similar?

Why were there so many abortion clinics in States like New hampshire, West virginia, Kentucky and the like all of which have far less than 10% black people?

Republicans fucked up when they took the choices away from the hypocrites in their own party. Republican leaders forgot that we just talked the game we don't actually be about that BAN ROE vs Wade life
 
Then they should lose that Dem Senate and Dem House be forced to earn our votes!

Please outline how this strategy would work. I'm sure you'll say something vague that has no details as to how allowing republicans to run the country will end in reparations. The second they return to power, they'll continue to dull your voting power. The fact that you believe a desperate Democratic party won't say they'll support a Black agenda & stall it out is hilarious. Then what? Back to republicans? An endless cycle of stupid. I hope your strategy isn't this. Please elaborate.
 
No, I mean like this:



First you posted a video of Biden advocating improving trans rights and said he should do the same for Black people. I showed you him doing the same level of advocacy and now you move the goal posts and say he should be MLK. Show me a video of Biden being RuPaul and then that would be equvivalent.

Well you're not going to be able to get that without at least some Republican votes.

Now show me where you are demanding such advocacy from the Republicans you shuck and jive for every day. I'll wait.
 
Last edited:
Then they should lose that Dem Senate and Dem House be forced to earn our votes!
I hear what you're saying bro. I do. But we as black people are stuck between a racist as fuck GOP and a "Let's use Black people to get elected and then not do anything to help them scrape the shit off of them that we dumped on them - but Let's help Ukraine with billions."

If we withhold our votes the Racist as fuck side wins and that is a helluva lot worse for Black people.

The best we can do is start businesses to take advantage of the programs being implemented

That clown is a phony. He wants to see black people suffer. He supports the GOP specifically for that reason. He posted this shit to try to prevent black support for democrats. He supports the party full of white supremacist. He never speaks down on his white master..He's a porch monkey. Mad because we left the plantation. Nigga worried about what we are getting for our votes while he doesn't vote and critizes those that do. He's a coon and can't be saved.
 
I understand that, but does the Hate Crimes Bill that Biden signed in 2021 benefit all of Americans not just Asians or do I have that wrong?

There have been laws created that targeted us in a negative way that were either written or misconstrued that way. Why can there not be laws to rebalance the scale sonce there were laws made to unbalance them?


There's not a single sentence that states Asian only. It acknowledges an increase in Asian hat crimes. But that's just in the preamble.

Then it lists all of the new laws, and none of them are asian only. You get just as much benefit from them as any Asian.

Here's the text of the bill.

Public Law 117-13
117th Congress

An Act



To facilitate the expedited review of COVID-19 hate crimes, and for
other purposes. <>

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled, <>
SECTION 1. <> SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act''.
SEC. 2. <> FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:
(1) Following the spread of COVID-19 in 2020, there has been
a dramatic increase in hate crimes and violence against Asian-
Americans and Pacific Islanders.
(2) According to a recent report, there were nearly 3,800
reported cases of anti-Asian discrimination and incidents
related to COVID-19 between March 19, 2020, and February 28,
2021, in all 50 States and the District of Columbia.
(3) During this time frame, race has been cited as the
primary reason for discrimination, making up over 90 percent of
incidents, and the United States condemns and denounces any and
all anti-Asian and Pacific Islander sentiment in any form.
(4) Roughly 36 percent of these incidents took place at a
business and more than 2,000,000 Asian-American businesses have
contributed to the diverse fabric of American life.
(5) More than 1,900,000 Asian-American and Pacific Islander
older adults, particularly those older adults who are recent
immigrants or have limited English proficiency, may face even
greater challenges in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic,
including discrimination, economic insecurity, and language
isolation.
(6) In the midst of this alarming surge in anti-Asian hate
crimes and incidents, a shooter murdered the following 8 people
in the Atlanta, Georgia region, 7 of whom were women and 6 of
whom were women of Asian descent: <>
(A) Xiaojie Tan.
(B) Daoyou Feng.
(C) Delaina Ashley Yaun Gonzalez.
(D) Paul Andre Michels.
(E) Soon Chung Park.
(F) Hyun Jung Grant.
(G) Suncha Kim.
(H) Yong Ae Yue.
(7) The people of the United States will always remember the
victims of these shootings and stand in solidarity with

[[Page 135 STAT. 266]]

those affected by this senseless tragedy and incidents of hate
that have affected the Asian and Pacific Islander communities.
SEC. 3. <> REVIEW OF HATE CRIMES.

(a) <> In General.--Not later than 7
days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall
designate an officer or employee of the Department of Justice whose
responsibility during the applicable period shall be to facilitate the
expedited review of hate crimes (as described in section 249 of title
18, United States Code) and reports of any such crime to Federal, State,
local, or Tribal law enforcement agencies.

(b) Applicable Period Defined.--In this section, the term
``applicable period'' means the period beginning on the date on which
the officer or employee is designated under subsection (a), and ending
on the date that is 1 year after the date on which the emergency period
described in subparagraph (B) of section 1135(g)(1) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b-5(g)(1)) ends, except that the Attorney
General may extend such period as appropriate.
SEC. 4. <> GUIDANCE.

(a) Guidance for Law Enforcement Agencies.--The Attorney General
shall issue guidance for State, local, and Tribal law enforcement
agencies, pursuant to this Act and other applicable law, on how to--
(1) establish online reporting of hate crimes or incidents,
and to have online reporting that is equally effective for
people with disabilities as for people without disabilities
available in multiple languages as determined by the Attorney
General;
(2) collect data disaggregated by the protected
characteristics described in section 249 of title 18, United
States Code; and
(3) expand public education campaigns aimed at raising
awareness of hate crimes and reaching victims, that are equally
effective for people with disabilities as for people without
disabilities.

(b) <> Guidance Relating to COVID-19
Pandemic.--The Attorney General and the Secretary of Health and Human
Services, in coordination with the COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force and
community-based organizations, shall issue guidance aimed at raising
awareness of hate crimes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
SEC. 5. <> JABARA-
HEYER NO HATE ACT.

(a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Khalid Jabara
and Heather Heyer National Opposition to Hate, Assault, and Threats to
Equality Act of 2021'' or the ``Jabara-Heyer NO HATE Act''.
(b) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
(1) The incidence of violence known as hate crimes, or
crimes motivated by bias, poses a serious national problem.
(2) According to data obtained by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, the incidence of such violence increased in 2019,
the most recent year for which data is available.
(3) In 1990, Congress enacted the Hate Crime Statistics Act
(Public Law 101-275; 28 U.S.C. 534 note) to provide the Federal
Government, law enforcement agencies, and the public with data
regarding the incidence of hate crime. The Hate Crime Statistics
Act and the Matthew Shepard and James

[[Page 135 STAT. 267]]

Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (division E of Public Law
111-84; 123 Stat. 2835) have enabled Federal authorities to
understand and, where appropriate, investigate and prosecute
hate crimes.
(4) A more complete understanding of the national problem
posed by hate crime is in the public interest and supports the
Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence
referenced in section 249(b)(1)(C) of title 18, United States
Code.
(5) However, a complete understanding of the national
problem posed by hate crimes is hindered by incomplete data from
Federal, State, and local jurisdictions through the Uniform
Crime Reports program authorized under section 534 of title 28,
United States Code, and administered by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.
(6) Multiple factors contribute to the provision of
inaccurate and incomplete data regarding the incidence of hate
crime through the Uniform Crime Reports program. A significant
contributing factor is the quality and quantity of training that
State and local law enforcement agencies receive on the
identification and reporting of suspected bias-motivated crimes.
(7) The problem of crimes motivated by bias is sufficiently
serious, widespread, and interstate in nature as to warrant
Federal financial assistance to States and local jurisdictions.
(8) Federal financial assistance with regard to certain
violent crimes motivated by bias enables Federal, State, and
local authorities to work together as partners in the
investigation and prosecution of such crimes.

(c) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Hate crime.--The term ``hate crime'' means an act
described in section 245, 247, or 249 of title 18, United States
Code, or in section 901 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42
U.S.C. 3631).
(2) Priority agency.--The term ``priority agency'' means--
(A) a law enforcement agency of a unit of local
government that serves a population of not less than
100,000, as computed by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation; or
(B) a law enforcement agency of a unit of local
government that--
(i) serves a population of not less than
50,000 and less than 100,000, as computed by the
Federal Bureau of Investigation; and
(ii) has reported no hate crimes through the
Uniform Crime Reports program in each of the 3
most recent calendar years for which such data is
available.
(3) State.--The term ``State'' has the meaning given the
term in section 901 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10251).
(4) Uniform crime reports.--The term ``Uniform Crime
Reports'' means the reports authorized under section 534 of
title 28, United States Code, and administered by the Federal
Bureau of Investigation that compile nationwide criminal
statistics for use--
(A) in law enforcement administration, operation,
and management; and
(B) to assess the nature and type of crime in the
United States.

[[Page 135 STAT. 268]]

(5) Unit of local government.--The term ``unit of local
government'' has the meaning given the term in section 901 of
title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of
1968 (34 U.S.C. 10251).

(d) <> Reporting of Hate
Crimes.--
(1) Implementation grants.--
(A) In general.--The Attorney General may make
grants to States and units of local government to assist
the State or unit of local government in implementing
the National Incident-Based Reporting System, including
to train employees in identifying and classifying hate
crimes in the National Incident-Based Reporting System.
(B) Priority.--In making grants under subparagraph
(A), the Attorney General shall give priority to States
and units of local government that develop and implement
the programs and activities described in subsection
(f)(2)(A).
(2) Reporting.--
(A) Compliance.--
(i) <> In
general.--Except as provided in clause (ii), in
each fiscal year beginning after the date that is
3 years after the date on which a State or unit of
local government first receives a grant under
paragraph (1), the State or unit of local
government shall provide to the Attorney General,
through the Uniform Crime Reporting system,
information pertaining to hate crimes committed in
that jurisdiction during the preceding fiscal
year.
(ii) Extensions; waiver.--The Attorney
General--
(I) may provide a 120-day extension
to a State or unit of local government
that is making good faith efforts to
comply with clause (i); and
(II) shall waive the requirements of
clause (i) if compliance with that
subparagraph by a State or unit of local
government would be unconstitutional
under the constitution of the State or
of the State in which the unit of local
government is located, respectively.
(B) Failure to comply.--If a State or unit of local
government that receives a grant under paragraph (1)
fails to substantially comply with subparagraph (A) of
this paragraph, the State or unit of local government
shall repay the grant in full, plus reasonable interest
and penalty charges allowable by law or established by
the Attorney General.

(e) Grants for State-run Hate Crime Hotlines.--
(1) Grants authorized.--
(A) In general.--The Attorney General shall make
grants to States to create State-run hate crime
reporting hotlines.
(B) Grant period.--A grant made under subparagraph
(A) shall be for a period of not more than 5 years.
(2) Hotline requirements.--A State shall ensure, with
respect to a hotline funded by a grant under paragraph (1),
that--
(A) the hotline directs individuals to--
(i) law enforcement if appropriate; and
(ii) local support services;

[[Page 135 STAT. 269]]

(B) any personally identifiable information that an
individual provides to an agency of the State through
the hotline is not directly or indirectly disclosed,
without the consent of the individual, to--
(i) any other agency of that State;
(ii) any other State;
(iii) the Federal Government; or
(iv) any other person or entity;
(C) the staff members who operate the hotline are
trained to be knowledgeable about--
(i) applicable Federal, State, and local hate
crime laws; and
(ii) local law enforcement resources and
applicable local support services; and
(D) the hotline is accessible to--
(i) individuals with limited English
proficiency, where appropriate; and
(ii) individuals with disabilities.
(3) Best practices.--The Attorney General shall issue
guidance to States on best practices for implementing the
requirements of paragraph (2).

(f) Information Collection by States and Units of Local
Government.--
(1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
(A) Covered agency.--The term ``covered agency''
means--
(i) a State law enforcement agency; and
(ii) a priority agency.
(B) Eligible entity.--The term ``eligible entity''
means--
(i) a State; or
(ii) a unit of local government that has a
priority agency.
(2) Grants.--
(A) In general.--The Attorney General may make
grants to eligible entities to assist covered agencies
within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity in
conducting law enforcement activities or crime reduction
programs to prevent, address, or otherwise respond to
hate crime, particularly as those activities or programs
relate to reporting hate crimes through the Uniform
Crime Reports program, including--
(i) adopting a policy on identifying,
investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(ii) developing a standardized system of
collecting, analyzing, and reporting the incidence
of hate crime;
(iii) establishing a unit specialized in
identifying, investigating, and reporting hate
crimes;
(iv) engaging in community relations functions
related to hate crime prevention and education
such as--
(I) establishing a liaison with
formal community-based organizations or
leaders; and

[[Page 135 STAT. 270]]

(II) conducting public meetings or
educational forums on the impact of hate
crimes, services available to hate crime
victims, and the relevant Federal,
State, and local laws pertaining to hate
crimes; and
(v) providing hate crime trainings for agency
personnel.
(B) Subgrants.--A State that receives a grant under
subparagraph (A) may award a subgrant to a unit of local
government within the State for the purposes under that
subparagraph, except that a unit of local government may
provide funding from such a subgrant to any law
enforcement agency of the unit of local government.
(3) Information required of states and units of local
government.--
(A) In general.--For each fiscal year in which a
State or unit of local government receives a grant or
subgrant under paragraph (2), the State or unit of local
government shall--
(i) collect information from each law
enforcement agency that receives funding from the
grant or subgrant summarizing the law enforcement
activities or crime reduction programs conducted
by the agency to prevent, address, or otherwise
respond to hate crime, particularly as those
activities or programs relate to reporting hate
crimes through the Uniform Crime Reports program;
and
(ii) <> submit to the
Attorney General a report containing the
information collected under clause (i).
(B) Semiannual law enforcement agency report.--
(i) <> In general.--In
collecting the information required under
subparagraph (A)(i), a State or unit of local
government shall require each law enforcement
agency that receives funding from a grant or
subgrant awarded to the State or unit of local
government under paragraph (2) to submit a
semiannual report to the State or unit of local
government that includes a summary of the law
enforcement activities or crime reduction programs
conducted by the agency during the reporting
period to prevent, address, or otherwise respond
to hate crime, particularly as those activities or
programs relate to reporting hate crimes through
the Uniform Crime Reports program.
(ii) Contents.--In a report submitted under
clause (i), a law enforcement agency shall, at a
minimum, disclose--
(I) whether the agency has adopted a
policy on identifying, investigating,
and reporting hate crimes;
(II) whether the agency has
developed a standardized system of
collecting, analyzing, and reporting the
incidence of hate crime;
(III) whether the agency has
established a unit specialized in
identifying, investigating, and
reporting hate crimes;
(IV) whether the agency engages in
community relations functions related to
hate crime, such as--

[[Page 135 STAT. 271]]

(aa) establishing a liaison
with formal community-based
organizations or leaders; and
(bb) conducting public
meetings or educational forums
on the impact of hate crime,
services available to hate crime
victims, and the relevant
Federal, State, and local laws
pertaining to hate crime; and
(V) the number of hate crime
trainings for agency personnel,
including the duration of the trainings,
conducted by the agency during the
reporting period.
(4) Compliance and redirection of funds.--
(A) <> In general.--Except as
provided in subparagraph (B), beginning not later than 1
year after the date of this Act, a State or unit of
local government receiving a grant or subgrant under
paragraph (2) shall comply with paragraph (3).
(B) Extensions; waiver.--The Attorney General--
(i) may provide a 120-day extension to a State
or unit of local government that is making good
faith efforts to collect the information required
under paragraph (3); and
(ii) shall waive the requirements of paragraph
(3) for a State or unit of local government if
compliance with that subsection by the State or
unit of local government would be unconstitutional
under the constitution of the State or of the
State in which the unit of local government is
located, respectively.

(g) Requirements of the Attorney General.--
(1) Information collection and analysis; report.--In order
to improve the accuracy of data regarding the incidence of hate
crime provided through the Uniform Crime Reports program, and
promote a more complete understanding of the national problem
posed by hate crime, the Attorney General shall--
(A) collect and analyze the information provided by
States and units of local government under subsection
(f) for the purpose of developing policies related to
the provision of accurate data obtained under the Hate
Crime Statistics Act (Public Law 101-275; 28 U.S.C. 534
note) by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and
(B) <> for each
calendar year beginning after the date of enactment of
this Act, publish and submit to Congress a report based
on the information collected and analyzed under
subparagraph (A).
(2) <> Contents of report.--A report
submitted under paragraph (1) shall include--
(A) a qualitative analysis of the relationship
between--
(i) the number of hate crimes reported by
State law enforcement agencies or other law
enforcement agencies that received funding from a
grant or subgrant awarded under paragraph (2)
through the Uniform Crime Reports program; and
(ii) the nature and extent of law enforcement
activities or crime reduction programs conducted
by

[[Page 135 STAT. 272]]

those agencies to prevent, address, or otherwise
respond to hate crime; and
(B) a quantitative analysis of the number of State
law enforcement agencies and other law enforcement
agencies that received funding from a grant or subgrant
awarded under paragraph (2) that have--
(i) adopted a policy on identifying,
investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(ii) developed a standardized system of
collecting, analyzing, and reporting the incidence
of hate crime;
(iii) established a unit specialized in
identifying, investigating, and reporting hate
crimes;
(iv) engaged in community relations functions
related to hate crime, such as--
(I) establishing a liaison with
formal community-based organizations or
leaders; and
(II) conducting public meetings or
educational forums on the impact of hate
crime, services available to hate crime
victims, and the relevant Federal,
State, and local laws pertaining to hate
crime; and
(v) conducted hate crime trainings for agency
personnel during the reporting period, including--
(I) the total number of trainings
conducted by each agency; and
(II) the duration of the trainings
described in subclause (I).

(h) Alternative Sentencing.--Section 249 of title 18, United States
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(e) <> Supervised Release.--If a
court includes, as a part of a sentence of imprisonment imposed for a
violation of subsection (a), a requirement that the defendant be placed
on a term of supervised release after imprisonment under section 3583,
the court may order, as an explicit condition of supervised release,
that the defendant undertake educational classes or community service
directly related to the community harmed by the defendant's offense.''.

Approved May 20, 2021.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 937:
 
Please outline how this strategy would work. I'm sure you'll say something vague that has no details as to how allowing republicans to run the country will end in reparations. The second they return to power, they'll continue to dull your voting power. The fact that you believe a desperate Democratic party won't say they'll support a Black agenda & stall it out is hilarious. Then what? Back to republicans? An endless cycle of stupid. I hope your strategy isn't this. Please elaborate.

He just wants the Dems to lose because he's a Republican. And you won't get an elaboration.
 
There's not a single sentence that states Asian only. It acknowledges an increase in Asian hat crimes. But that's just in the preamble.

Then it lists all of the new laws, and none of them are asian only. You get just as much benefit from them as any Asian.

Here's the text of the bill.
Well pardon fucking me. Not being a smartass. I just took it for what they called it, not seeing it for what it was. Respect.

What do you do in real life? You can DM me if I'd you don't want to say it publicly.

I'm a bank vault, but I am curious. The anonymity on this board is necessary, but you can't blame me for being curious. I could be speaking with my next door neighbor or Earl G Graves Jr

I respect those who have the knowledge that I do not have because I glazed over the things I didn't have time to read
 
First you posted a video os Biden advocating improving trans rights and said he should do the same for Black people. I showed you him doing the same level of advocacy and now you move the goal posts and say he should be MLK. Show me a video of Biden being RuPaul and then that would be equivalent.
:roflmao2: :roflmao2: :roflmao2: :roflmao2: :roflmao2:
Well you're not going to be able to get that without at least some Republican votes.

Now show me where you are demanding such advocacy from the Republicans you shuck and jive for every day. I'll wait.
mic-drop-obama.gif


200w.gif


7PW5.gif
 
A lot of y'all in here have way too superficial views on politics. Y'all will read headlines and titles bit don't read the articles or the bills and it burns y'all every time.

You got dudes in here that admit to hating Dems telling you that Dems should lose the House and Senate cause that would be good for Black people. Does that really make any sense to you? Would you really want the party the embraced racism to be able to appoint judges, Supreme Court judges, win positions that will control elections? Y'all thing gerrymandering is bad now imagine it with Republicans judges who would say it's no big deal.
 
A lot of y'all in here have way too superficial views on politics. Y'all will read headlines and titles bit don't read the articles or the bills and it burns y'all every time.

You got dudes in here that admit to hating Dems telling you that Dems should lose the House and Senate cause that would be good for Black people. Does that really make any sense to you? Would you really want the party the embraced racism to be able to appoint judges, Supreme Court judges, win positions that will control elections? Y'all thing gerrymandering is bad now imagine it with Republicans judges who would say it's no big deal.
1294722890214_8747238.png
 
A lot of y'all in here have way too superficial views on politics. Y'all will read headlines and titles bit don't read the articles or the bills and it burns y'all every time.

You got dudes in here that admit to hating Dems telling you that Dems should lose the House and Senate cause that would be good for Black people. Does that really make any sense to you? Would you really want the party the embraced racism to be able to appoint judges, Supreme Court judges, win positions that will control elections? Y'all thing gerrymandering is bad now imagine it with Republicans judges who would say it's no big deal.
You are dumber than I thought if you think the Democrats don’t “embrace racism” because 1) you clearly do not know what racism is and 2) the leader of the DNC, Joe Biden, was trained in politics by Robert Byrd and Strom Thurmond.

I think that the cognitive dissonance that these guys are going through because they really want to be open LGBT club members is destroying their brain.
 
Cheeto might have been explosive when he first came out announcing his run for prez, but over time that shit gets old as it always does. The mania dies down and people eventually see through the bullshit.
 
Way too many in here don't realize the GOP is all about control.

The attacks on abortion is about control. Controlling women. One of the biggest changes to the work force was after The Pill was released. Now women could control when they got pregnant and they went out and got jobs. Conservative men hated that cause it's real hard to control someone who makes their own money and now you have to compete with women for jobs.

The attacks on Affirmative Action is the same thing. Now you can't control where Black people work or get educated and now you have to compete with Black people in both areas.

Voting Rights......control of who does and doesn't get to vote and decide who will represent them.

So all I will say to you is that if someone tells you of a political party that has spent 50 yrs trying to get to this goal why would you EVER think letting them win would be a good thing.
 
You are dumber than I thought if you think the Democrats don’t “embrace racism” because 1) you clearly do not know what racism is and 2) the leader of the DNC, Joe Biden, was trained in politics by Robert Byrd and Strom Thurmond.

I think that the cognitive dissonance that these guys are going through because they really want to be open LGBT club members is destroying their brain.

Sorry but no one take you seriously on here. We don't take your alter egos seriously on here either.

However

That might change if you posted in the verification thread. But we both know that won't happen and we all know why.
 
A lot of y'all in here have way too superficial views on politics. Y'all will read headlines and titles bit don't read the articles or the bills and it burns y'all every time.

You got dudes in here that admit to hating Dems telling you that Dems should lose the House and Senate cause that would be good for Black people. Does that really make any sense to you? Would you really want the party the embraced racism to be able to appoint judges, Supreme Court judges, win positions that will control elections? Y'all thing gerrymandering is bad now imagine it with Republicans judges who would say it's no big deal.

Exactly.

While these dudes are proposing their stunts of lettign Republicans have full control, Republicans flood the benches with racist judges in their late 30's and early 40's that have lifetime terms on the bench.

That's 40 years of racist judges. 40 fucking years.
 
Exactly.

While these dudes are proposing their stunts of lettign Republicans have full control, Republicans flood the benches with racist judges in their late 30's and early 40's that have lifetime terms on the bench.

That's 40 years of racist judges. 40 fucking years.
its called the long game and democrats and progressives STILL havent figured out how to play it :smh: :smh: :smh: :smh:
 
Damn right it was propaganda. It's a wonder who pays attention to those bullshit ass propaganda ads about who's leading before the votes are even cast/counted?

They pinned all of their shit on the role versus Wade overturning and that ended up biting them in the ass. I tell the story a lot and I probably told it here

**

While an ex-girlfriend was going to John Carroll University, she got to know a girl in the dorm room next door named Rachel. Rachel was White and could either be cool or stuck up depending upon what day you spoke to her. I had spoken to Rachel on many issues before as well.

One day in the lunchroom a bunch of students were having a discussion about pro-life versus pro-choice. Rachel was very outspoken on the subject.

"Oh my God. How could a woman have an abortion? That's like the worst thing a woman could ever do. I don't think I could even be a friend of someone who had an abortion."

She went on a whole Pro-Life rant.

When everyone disbursed, I asked, "Rachel, do you really believe that shit?"

With a straight face she said, "Hell no. I've had three."

"My mother told me that no decent White man wants to marry a woman with someone else's kid. If you ever want to get married either swallow it or abort it."

She spoke to exactly what I stated earlier. Nobody wants to raise or pay for any one else's kid and every kid you have makes you less marketable in the dating world.

White women seem to understand that more than black women which is why white women make up more than 60% of the abortions, and probably closer to 80% of the abortions

**

Just like this political shit is about control, Republicans being about pro-life is about control as well. White people know that white people get a shit ton more abortions than everyone else

You think she's the only white girl whose mother told her something like that or similar?

Why were there so many abortion clinics in States like New hampshire, West virginia, Kentucky and the like all of which have far less than 10% black people?

Republicans fucked up when they took the choices away from the hypocrites in their own party. Republican leaders forgot that we just talked the game we don't actually be about that BAN ROE vs Wade life


I know that a few white girls I went to school with had abortions. They fucked around in college but had common sense not to have a baby. Somehow our women miss that memo.
 
Please outline how this strategy would work. I'm sure you'll say something vague that has no details as to how allowing republicans to run the country will end in reparations. The second they return to power, they'll continue to dull your voting power. The fact that you believe a desperate Democratic party won't say they'll support a Black agenda & stall it out is hilarious. Then what? Back to republicans? An endless cycle of stupid. I hope your strategy isn't this. Please elaborate.

I've said NONE of the above, but it's obvious you're so biased and have so many assumptions that there is no point in responding to you.

First you posted a video of Biden advocating improving trans rights and said he should do the same for Black people. I showed you him doing the same level of advocacy and now you move the goal posts and say he should be MLK. Show me a video of Biden being RuPaul and then that would be equvivalent.

Well you're not going to be able to get that without at least some Republican votes.

Now show me where you are demanding such advocacy from the Republicans you shuck and jive for every day. I'll wait.

There was no "moving of the goal posts". I never said Biden should be MLK. I posted a simple response from MLK that succinctly breaks down what reparations entails, why, and who should get it.

The fallacy people like the OP keep furthering is that we need to demand something that helps only us. When in truth we need to support things that help everybody but demand and make sure that everybody includes us as well.

And this is where we differ! This is it right here. You're absolutely right that we need to demand something that helps only us (and by "us", I mean Black Americans who are descendants of American chattel slavery - I'm not sure if that included you). This doesn't mean that we need to obstruct other people, but it does mean that WE need to make OUR struggle primary. B1.
 
I know that a few white girls I went to school with had abortions. They fucked around in college but had common sense not to have a baby. Somehow our women miss that memo.

Different culture due to a different historical and environmental experience.
 
I've said NONE of the above, but it's obvious you're so biased and have so many assumptions that there is no point in responding to you.

I did nothing but preface what I believed your strategy would be. If I'm wrong, elaborate on how "Democrats need to earn our votes." helps the Black community.
 
We don't.
Now how do we win with Democrats in office?

To be expected. A non answer. Admit you're a republican agent & I'll stop asking you to explain how either not voting or voting republican will benefit Black america.

Explain how voting Democrat doesn't benefit Black americans. Or explain what the alternative is. You type republican. Bitch & complain while offering zero solutions. Just vague statements with no context.
 
Back
Top