THIS WAS THE SHIT AFTER THE 1ST ONE.. THIS ONE IS 2ND.. THEN DANNY'S JOINT.
Oh god make it stop… predator prequel “prey”..predator vs native Americans
- Thread starter tallblacknyc
- Start date
Nigga yes they did. Go look up the cast
I expected them to speak their language (Uto-Aztecan).
Shit they had them damn French speaking theirs
Worked perfectly with this Movie (GREAT DAMN MOVIE TOO I might add)
I also had issues with the CGI, shit looked too cartoony at times
Originality and realism to help the viewer immerse themselves into the story that’s what purpose it serves. It’s not about serving the few Comanche who may or may not watch it. But they didn’t add the Comanche dialogue to the speaking roles because Americans viewers are stupid, illiterate and finicky about reading subtitles that they would lose interest in the story.
The French spoke French but the Natives spoke English and viewers must pretend their speaking in their Native tongue while in English. Bogus and hella bootsy.
That’s excuses and I still think it’s bogus but I get that’s why they did it for the American audience.
Fuck all that. I want to be able to understand the movie and if its in a language I don't understand, I'm not fucking it. English or nothing for me. I don't need no damn authenticity or realism in a movie about a space alien who comes to earth and fuck with native Americans. ...hard pass. Just entertain me and speaking a non English language is not the way to go. Hollywood ain't trying to hear that shit. they want asses in seats.. all the realism / authencity shit is secondary.
How long do you think a "realistic" predator movie would last?
Like everything else, they catering to women
Like everything else, they catering to women
Bruh they have invisible cloaking device.. Lol
It was OK... It wasn't the greatest, but it certainly wasn't the worst.
I took several issues with it, but I was being really nit-picky:
1) The Comanche were all about horses. They were probably the best bareback horse riders alive. They were one of the most feared tribes west of the Mississippi; and the were the enemies of the Apache (who were masters at guerilla fighting). Yet in the movie, the French had more horses than the Comanche. The Comanche fought and dominated damn near every tribe they came into contact with because they were masters of the horse.
2) If the so-called lion had o'le girl trapped in the tree, she falls yet the lion doesn't kill her... Yeah Ok.
3) The Comanche braves don't know the difference between bear tracks and Yautja tracks (I'm making allowances for them not knowing what a Yautja was).
4) Once she found out that the Yautja couldn't see her, it would have made more sense to go get other warriors, and they all take that shit, then hunt the Yautja down.
5) O'le girl was not believable as a warrior. Not at all to me. The story should have been built around her brother. I liked his character best.
Like I said, it was an ok movie for streaming. I wouldn't have paid to see it at the theater though.
I took several issues with it, but I was being really nit-picky:
1) The Comanche were all about horses. They were probably the best bareback horse riders alive. They were one of the most feared tribes west of the Mississippi; and the were the enemies of the Apache (who were masters at guerilla fighting). Yet in the movie, the French had more horses than the Comanche. The Comanche fought and dominated damn near every tribe they came into contact with because they were masters of the horse.
2) If the so-called lion had o'le girl trapped in the tree, she falls yet the lion doesn't kill her... Yeah Ok.
3) The Comanche braves don't know the difference between bear tracks and Yautja tracks (I'm making allowances for them not knowing what a Yautja was).
4) Once she found out that the Yautja couldn't see her, it would have made more sense to go get other warriors, and they all take that shit, then hunt the Yautja down.
5) O'le girl was not believable as a warrior. Not at all to me. The story should have been built around her brother. I liked his character best.
Like I said, it was an ok movie for streaming. I wouldn't have paid to see it at the theater though.
Also too... We have to stop believing that these so called "indigenous" people that they're are putting in front of us are the real deal. These people are from European descent (Five Dollar Indians).
If you see them in real life, some of them are lighter than the DeBarges are.
These are some of the real indigenous people:
They are white washing these people out of existence. It's being called, "Paper Genocide."
If you see them in real life, some of them are lighter than the DeBarges are.
These are some of the real indigenous people:
They are white washing these people out of existence. It's being called, "Paper Genocide."
She shall know of spirit Zod and his great grace
@largebillsonlyplease
we now have a better predator killer than Danny
no Stacys, jus beaver slides and ax
we now have a better predator killer than Danny
no Stacys, jus beaver slides and ax
Last edited:
Why do y’all think all Indigenous people are one giant group? There’s thousands of different tribes and they don’t all look the same. Some are darker than others some are light. You can clearly see these people in the movie are not whiteAlso too... We have to stop believing that these so called "indigenous" people that they're are putting in front of us are the real deal. These people are from European descent (Five Dollar Indians).
If you see them in real life, some of them are lighter than the DeBarges are.
These are some of the real indigenous people:
They are white washing these people out of existence. It's being called, "Paper Genocide."
Fake news.. I’m predator 1 all day but predator 2 with the corrupted cop Danny was better than mulan
Lmaoooo and this guy is big on the “movie experience “..if he says he wouldn’t even go he pretty much said it was b movie statusIt was ok
Decent watch, but wouldn't have wanted to leave my house for it.
1) I don't think that they are all one giant group. I know better than that.
2) I agree that some are darker and some are lighter.
3) I cannot see that the people in the group are not of "European" descent. The people I see in the movie are light and they have a lot of European blood in them. The movies always use these types of genetics, when they full well could use the other genetics taken from the darker tribes or darker members from the tribes that they do decide to use.
4) Have you heard of Quanah Parker? Probably not. But he was a Comanche chief, one the last, and his mother was a white woman. White folks love to say that they are a descendants of Quanah Parker's band (the Kwahadi ) of Comanche, and not the other bands. Why do you think that is?
5) I've been doing a lot of research on American Indians/Native Americans because I've found out that I'm a descendant of several tribes: A) Choctaw, B) Apache, and C) Comanche. This is coupled with me being a Black man.
So, since I've became aware of my family lineage, I look at a lot of this with a critical eye. Do I get it right all of the time? No, not by far. But, I'm right about this... I bet you that!
I meant as far as “black” people being the real copper colored people.
them 5 dolla Indians are not the original like us
Hey Bruh... I'm guilty. I can be a huge nerd sometimes.Dudes in this thread about the interstellar alien that has tech that bends light around him making him invisible are mad about realism.
U stole my postAlso too... We have to stop believing that these so called "indigenous" people that they're are putting in front of us are the real deal. These people are from European descent (Five Dollar Indians).
If you see them in real life, some of them are lighter than the DeBarges are.
These are some of the real indigenous people:
They are white washing these people out of existence. It's being called, "Paper Genocide."
he thinks them niggas are the true natives
man fuck outta here
It’s funny how nobody mention this nig tech for the most part was better than his future counterparts 300 yrs later
also how the directors completely forgot to do the hang it’s kills upside down.. that was a main part in the first 2 predators
also how the directors completely forgot to do the hang it’s kills upside down.. that was a main part in the first 2 predators
Natives were introduced to horses by european colonizers. So depending on the decade, it would be plausible that the frenchmen had more horses than the comanche.
I believe most of the horses that the Indians of the plains acquired were from the Spanish.
Hernando de Soto came to the Americas at around 1539. I'm sure he brought a lot of horses with them. The movie I think said 1719 or something like that.
But, I'd have to agree with you. Just because the Spanish were here does not mean that the Comanche had mastered the horse at that time or they may not have even heard of the Spanish that early (The movie's timeline).
Good observation, Brother.
The movie was pretty good. Not quite theatre worthy, but a really good stream. I feel like less dialog would've worked too. I was skeptical at first, because all I was thinking about was Alien tech vs Native American with bows and spears. But then I thought about and remembered. That Arnold didn't defeat the Predator using a bunch of tech. He use the environment and what he knew about the Predator to outsmart it.
Some of the best parts of the OG movie was the Native American soldier sensing that something was hunting them. He could feel the Predators presence just by being in tune with the Jungle/Nature. I wish they would've fleshed that aspect out a bit more with this movie.
Some of the best parts of the OG movie was the Native American soldier sensing that something was hunting them. He could feel the Predators presence just by being in tune with the Jungle/Nature. I wish they would've fleshed that aspect out a bit more with this movie.
Military actually has that tech and has for a while now.
Similar threads
