Fair or foul? Baby daddy didn't bring food for other 3 kids, just for his son.

Was he wrong or right?

  • He was Right, fuck them kids

    Votes: 115 85.8%
  • He was wrong, he had a responsibility to help his son's half siblings

    Votes: 19 14.2%

  • Total voters
    134
I knew “EGO“ was going to be an answer but that says more about the dad than the situation, your kid is happy so that should be the main concern. I've seen guys who don't care anything about their kids get into fights with the guy who the kids mother is dating doing stuff with the kid
Exactly...
 
exactly...especially if he taking your kid to disney world and YOUVE never been to disney world yourself much less taken your kid for his first time. I mean that can make a man feel some kind of way.

lets continue....baby daddy 2 takes his kids to events and stuff but not your kid.... he brings food for his kids but not yours . I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong but kids feelings can come into play here.
See, that's where it gets real.

I don't have any kids. So if I get with a woman who has a kid and we break up, I'm going to go all out for my kid. How much I do for the other kid (maximum of 1) is dependent on how much that shit costs.

Yeah, I might spring for two value meals at $3 each. That's pennies. But trips to Disney World, Cedar Point plus the Fast Pass that shit gets expensive and I'm probably going to just take my kid.

I've done this shit a few times this year. I'm single. Most of the chicks between 30 and 46 have kids, at least one. Every time I've met a chick who had a deadbeat POS baby daddy I fall the fuck back.

I don't want the complete responsibility of taking care of this other motherfucker's kid. I would prefer to date women without kids, but if the father is involved and picks his kid up and buys his kids stuff I'm much more inclined to get into one of those situations than the deadbeat situation.

Me: So where's the kid's dad? Does he pay support or even come and pick his kid up?

Her: Nope. He doesn't do any of that.

Me: Alright then.... and I probably don't talk to her again. I know that I am just one busted condom from being in a situation just like the man in this video. I'm not taking a chance

Could I use the pussy? Of course I could. And many single mothers are desperate oh, honestly you can tell because got the choices they make

Still, I'm not trying to be caught up in a situation like this so I'm only getting into a situation where the father of the kid contributes time and stuff because I already don't like other people's kids, I'll be damned if I'll be forced to take on the full responsibility too
 
Peace.
The issue is that this behavior will create a culture and foster entitlement on her part. In principle, it does not cost a lot to buy something off the value menu for the others. However, it’s been said already that his direct responsibility is to his seed and no one else. If his kid had a bday and bought him a tablet, is he supposed to purchase three more?
There are matters of principle and there is harsh realities.

It's about getting her kids on your side so she can't talk bad about you in front of your seed.

I mean she can try, but all it's going to do is get a bunch of teary doe eyed innocent looking faces staring up at her asking "why don't you ever buy us nuggets mommy?"
 
Last edited:
exactly...especially if he taking your kid to disney world and YOUVE never been to disney world yourself much less taken your kid for his first time. I mean that can make a man feel some kind of way.

lets continue....baby daddy 2 takes his kids to events and stuff but not your kid.... he brings food for his kids but not yours . I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong but kids feelings can come into play here.

If your an active father then a kid will never miss out. They take theirs to events, I take mine out of the country. They go to Disney, we go camping and hunting. The whole "keeping up with the Joneses" mentality is killed when as a father you do stuff that others don't do. Kids care more about time with parents and not being abandoned.

But the key thing is to not have children with a woman you are not married to. Too many men think with their dick and emotions as opposed to their brain and logic.

That said buddy in the video was right in his argument, but I would've brought them babies food regardless if they were mine or not just off of sincerity and good karma.
 
Last edited:
See, that's where it gets real.

I don't have any kids. So if I get with a woman who has a kid and we break up, I'm going to go all out for my kid. How much I do for the other kid (maximum of 1) is dependent on how much that shit costs.

Yeah, I might spring for two value meals at $3 each. That's pennies. But trips to Disney World, Cedar Point plus the Fast Pass that shit gets expensive and I'm probably going to just take my kid.

I've done this shit a few times this year. I'm single. Most of the chicks between 30 and 46 have kids, at least one. Every time I've met a chick who had a deadbeat POS baby daddy I fall the fuck back.

I don't want the complete responsibility of taking care of this other motherfucker's kid. I would prefer to date women without kids, but if the father is involved and picks his kid up and buys his kids stuff I'm much more inclined to get into one of those situations than the deadbeat situation.

Me: So where's the kid's dad? Does he pay support or even come and pick his kid up?

Her: Nope. He doesn't do any of that.

Me: Alright then.... and I probably don't talk to her again. I know that I am just one busted condom from being in a situation just like the man in this video. I'm not taking a chance

Could I use the pussy? Of course I could. And many single mothers are desperate oh, honestly you can tell because got the choices they make

Still, I'm not trying to be caught up in a situation like this so I'm only getting into a situation where the father of the kid contributes time and stuff because I already don't like other people's kids, I'll be damned if I'll be forced to take on the full responsibility too

If most of the chicks 30 to 46 years old have at least one kid then you're looking in the wrong place.

Go to the city. It's full of women at age who don't have children and never wanted them in the first place.
 
Yeah he was a dumb ass, for the 7-12 bucks he spent on that garbage food he could have got a bag of buns, 1lb of ground beef, a bag of potatoes, and cooking oil, all for under 15$, and then he would have been the one yelling at her ABOUT HOW WHY DON'T WANNA COOK....AND HAD A receipt to prove it.

So tired of the dumbness in this generation.
 
My thing is this.....

Who knows how many times this situation has come up. Lil man calls dad saying he's hungry. Dad not expecting to have to feed the son because he's with the mother, probably doesn't have extra food on hand, so he rushes to McDs and grabs something quick.....now who's to say the first few times he wasn't "a nice guy " and ask "hey are the other kids hungry too?!" And bought them something as well.....


But there's only so much goodwill / grace in the world.

Also they are clearly NOT together. So that eliminates that scenario. (If they were together dude should know better than to bring food for one kid and not the rest.)

But he is correct it is not his "obligation" to keep buying food for 3 kids that are not his.....


He may have done it in the past and finally stopped. But also, why are all the kids hungry? She knows when she gets her stamps.....and obviously at least one dude is trying to do right......thats mismanagement of funds and that box.....

Why should he pay extra cuz she can't manage her box correctly? Haha
 
Women are big mad about this online. I just saw it posted on Facebook and just 5 minutes after I made my comment, some woman had something to say

I would argue that most single mothers are a product of poor decision making. They are making 18-year commitments to someone who wasn't willing to make a commitment to them.

Getting pregnant by boyfriends is not a good decision, and compounding it by doing it over and over again by multiple boyfriends or even the same boyfriend without getting a commitment is moronic
 
Women are big mad about this online. I just saw it posted on Facebook and just 5 minutes after I made my comment, some woman had something to say

I would argue that most single mothers are a product of poor decision making. They are making 18-year commitments to someone who wasn't willing to make a commitment to them.

Getting pregnant by boyfriends is not a good decision, and compounding it by doing it over and over again by multiple boyfriends or even the same boyfriend without getting a commitment is moronic

:ssshhh:the pregnancy IS the commitment:ssshhh:

now whats the OTHER SIDE of that argument??:idea::idea::idea:
 
:ssshhh:the pregnancy IS the commitment:ssshhh:

now whats the OTHER SIDE of that argument??:idea::idea::idea:
Someone in this thread said they are a realtor and a man and a woman came into his office looking to buy a house. The baby carrier was on his desk.

Dude went to the bathroom and she told him she didn't want to buy a house with that dude.

BUT THE BABY!

How the fuck are you not ready and willing to buy a house with the guy but you JUST had a baby with that guy?

Baby/pregnancy = commitment they're okay with
House = commitment they can deal with
Marriage = too much of a commitment

Make it make sense
 
Someone in this thread said they are a realtor and a man and a woman came into his office looking to buy a house. The baby carrier was on his desk.

Dude went to the bathroom and she told him she didn't want to buy a house with that dude.

BUT THE BABY!

How the fuck are you not ready and willing to buy a house with the guy but you JUST had a baby with that guy?

Baby/pregnancy = commitment they're okay with
House = commitment they can deal with
Marriage = too much of a commitment

Make it make sense

both sides do that homie....stop acting like its one sided....

dudes wanna hit it raw. bust a nut deep inside then act like there are no consequence to this action.


the most annoying part of this kind of debate is the same dudes who complain about all these damn babies by irresponsible women are the same guys saying that planned parenthood is conspiracy to kill black babies and disappear the black population....

so which is it?? you don't want these babies born but you don't want them aborted either...

make it make sense
 
both sides do that homie....stop acting like its one sided....

dudes wanna hit it raw. bust a nut deep inside then act like there are no consequence to this action.


the most annoying part of this kind of debate is the same dudes who complain about all these damn babies by irresponsible women are the same guys saying that planned parenthood is conspiracy to kill black babies and disappear the black population....

so which is it?? you don't want these babies born but you don't want them aborted either...

make it make sense
Oh, I know that it's not one-sided. I know that it's not just the women. I know that so many of these dudes are walking around like human semen water sprinklers, turning on the sprinklers, wetting up everything in sight and then running away from any responsibility

I don't have a problem with planned parenthood. I think more women should get abortions because too many women have babies they can't afford with guys who ain't shit

Add to it the ever-increasing trend of stealthing, where the guy takes off the condom during sex and the woman doesn't know it. Forcing her to have a baby like that when she was trying to protect against it is unfair

My problem is no one holds these damn guys accountable and women keep fucking with them

I personally couldn't be a friend of a guy who is a deadbeat dad
 
both sides do that homie....stop acting like its one sided....

dudes wanna hit it raw. bust a nut deep inside then act like there are no consequence to this action.


the most annoying part of this kind of debate is the same dudes who complain about all these damn babies by irresponsible women are the same guys saying that planned parenthood is conspiracy to kill black babies and disappear the black population....

so which is it?? you don't want these babies born but you don't want them aborted either...

make it make sense
Cut the shit. Throughout human history, pregnancy was life and death. Mortality for childbirth was high. Women literally risk their fucking lives being reckless with pussy. Also, women couldn't pass pussy around like hotcakes for the very reason this fucking thread was made. Men tend not to want to raise other men's kids.

Now that childbirth is much safer and Uncle Sam can play daddy, women are passing pussy out like halloween candy. Men haven't changed. Pussy is just easier to get then at any fucking time in human history. Women used to bring shame to the family if they got pregnant out of wedlock.

Matter of fact, if you transported modern men back 150 years there would be pussy shock. :confused: "Fuck you mean I can't have sex until we are married?" Meanwhile, take a man from 150 year ago and show him he don't have to go to the cat house and free pussy is everywhere he'd be like :eek::eek::eek::eek:

Only game goofy women and weak men think sexuality is equal. Matter of fact, childbirth still riskier for black women when compared to whites. Women also risk dropped bladders and lifelong problems from just one kid.
 
Cut the shit. Throughout human history, pregnancy was life and death. Mortality for childbirth was high. Women literally risk their fucking lives being reckless with pussy. Also, women couldn't pass pussy around like hotcakes for the very reason this fucking thread was made. Men tend not to want to raise other men's kids.

Now that childbirth is much safer and Uncle Sam can play daddy, women are passing pussy out like halloween candy. Men haven't changed. Pussy is just easier to get then at any fucking time in human history. Women used to bring shame to the family if they got pregnant out of wedlock.

Matter of fact, if you transported modern men back 150 years there would be pussy shock. :confused: "Fuck you mean I can't have sex until we are married?" Meanwhile, take a man from 150 year ago and show him he don't have to go to the cat house and free pussy is everywhere he'd be like :eek::eek::eek::eek:

you wanna cut the shit?? then lets cut the shit... whose morality are you going by....some european puritan concept from late middle ages?? You wanna go back 150 years? Lets take the Way Back Machine even further....

In Virginia, sex ratios among the English immigrants were highly skewed in the early years (there were six men to one woman in the 1630s), so it would not have been surprising to find white men looking for black or Indian women as partners; what may be more surprising is the large number of white women servants who crossed racial lines.

As early as 1662, fines for fornication across the color line were set at double the amount for in-group nonmarital sex, typically 1,000 rather than 500 pounds of tobacco.
However, the Northampton County court, at least, was slow to change. Several prosecutions for fornication between blacks and whites during the 1660s resulted in fines of 500 pounds of tobacco. Only much later is there any evidence that higher fines were enforced, around the time when the legislature passed a series of laws with harsher penalties for interracial sex and marriage.

Tamar Smith, a white woman in Northampton County, served the prison term and paid the fine in order to marry mulatto Edward Hitchens, but few other interracial marriages were recorded after 1705. By contrast, a significant number of women continued to be charged with interracial bastardy. In Northampton County there were numerous cases of interracial fornication before 1705, but after 1705, we see increasing charges against both white and mulatto women for bastard bearing as well, including Tabitha Cope, Hannah Carter, Margret Edsall, Esther Weeks, Anne Toyer, and Elisha Pitts. These women paid their fines or named the father to have him brought into court to “make the county harmless” and pay the church wardens.

Thus, in Virginia, a significant number of white servant women continued to form relationships with men of color, often bearing mixed-race children, but they paid an increasingly heavy price for doing so. Women and men at the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum defied increasing pressure from slaveholding elites to separate white from “negro,” especially when it resulted in more free children of color born to white women. As in Louisiana, this was a small but important population in Virginia, one that maintained links with enslaved people of color as well as free white people. Legal proscriptions could not keep people apart; however, they did, in both Virginia and Louisiana, keep them from creating the kind of community that was already blossoming in Cuba.**


**[/B]How did Africans become “blacks” in the Americas? Becoming Free, Becoming Black tells the story of enslaved and free people of color who used the law to claim freedom and citizenship for themselves and their loved ones. Their communities challenged slaveholders’ efforts to make blackness synonymous with slavery. Looking closely at three slave societies – Cuba, Virginia, and Louisiana

Becoming Free, Becoming Black

does that seem like there was a scarcity of pussy then??? Were women then were subject to all manner of penalties plus having their families broken up by having their children or father of the children sold away if not killed. On top of all of that you STILL have a fucked up mortality rate to boot.

Didn't stop the fucking around did it??

so that myths BUSTED.. :rolleyes2:


Only game goofy women and weak men think sexuality is equal. Matter of fact, childbirth still riskier for black women when compared to whites. Women also risk dropped bladders and lifelong problems from just one kid.

so which is it...is abortion a good option or is abortion bad and planned parenthood a plot against the black community??
 
He is right not buy food for the other kids. She will take advantage of him and can take him to court saying he is provider of the kids and want more. Dude is doing the right thing!

:idea: thats an interesting take...how the court would interpret those gestures. I would say it would depend on the judge and they personally would interpret it. It would definitely be at least a 50/50 dice roll tho.
 
you wanna cut the shit?? then lets cut the shit... whose morality are you going by....some european puritan concept from late middle ages?? You wanna go back 150 years? Lets take the Way Back Machine even further....

In Virginia, sex ratios among the English immigrants were highly skewed in the early years (there were six men to one woman in the 1630s), so it would not have been surprising to find white men looking for black or Indian women as partners; what may be more surprising is the large number of white women servants who crossed racial lines.

As early as 1662, fines for fornication across the color line were set at double the amount for in-group nonmarital sex, typically 1,000 rather than 500 pounds of tobacco.
However, the Northampton County court, at least, was slow to change. Several prosecutions for fornication between blacks and whites during the 1660s resulted in fines of 500 pounds of tobacco. Only much later is there any evidence that higher fines were enforced, around the time when the legislature passed a series of laws with harsher penalties for interracial sex and marriage.

Tamar Smith, a white woman in Northampton County, served the prison term and paid the fine in order to marry mulatto Edward Hitchens, but few other interracial marriages were recorded after 1705. By contrast, a significant number of women continued to be charged with interracial bastardy. In Northampton County there were numerous cases of interracial fornication before 1705, but after 1705, we see increasing charges against both white and mulatto women for bastard bearing as well, including Tabitha Cope, Hannah Carter, Margret Edsall, Esther Weeks, Anne Toyer, and Elisha Pitts. These women paid their fines or named the father to have him brought into court to “make the county harmless” and pay the church wardens.

Thus, in Virginia, a significant number of white servant women continued to form relationships with men of color, often bearing mixed-race children, but they paid an increasingly heavy price for doing so. Women and men at the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum defied increasing pressure from slaveholding elites to separate white from “negro,” especially when it resulted in more free children of color born to white women. As in Louisiana, this was a small but important population in Virginia, one that maintained links with enslaved people of color as well as free white people. Legal proscriptions could not keep people apart; however, they did, in both Virginia and Louisiana, keep them from creating the kind of community that was already blossoming in Cuba.**



**[/B]How did Africans become “blacks” in the Americas? Becoming Free, Becoming Black tells the story of enslaved and free people of color who used the law to claim freedom and citizenship for themselves and their loved ones. Their communities challenged slaveholders’ efforts to make blackness synonymous with slavery. Looking closely at three slave societies – Cuba, Virginia, and Louisiana

Becoming Free, Becoming Black

does that seem like there was a scarcity of pussy then??? Were women then were subject to all manner of penalties plus having their families broken up by having their children or father of the children sold away if not killed. On top of all of that you STILL have a fucked up mortality rate to boot.

Didn't stop the fucking around did it??

so that myths BUSTED.. :rolleyes2:




so which is it...is abortion a good option or is abortion bad and planned parenthood a plot against the black community??
This and the one about that black woman able to claim her father was white is what led to the whole "one drop" rule right?
 
I can't vote either way. My opinion is that at the very best he should give his son something on the sly. Don't bring attention to it, just do it and make sure your offspring keeps it hush.

If it's food, then bring enough for everyone.
 
The mother is actually correct.
It is her household and that man is sowing discord.
Can't do shit like that.
He needs to get full custody of his child.
I would rather take mine than have him living with 3 other motherfuckers.
 
The mother is actually correct.
It is her household and that man is sowing discord.
Can't do shit like that.
He needs to get full custody of his child.
I would rather take mine than have him living with 3 other motherfuckers.
I will agree - THAT - he should have just taken his with him to McDonald's when he was with him.

But the other 3 are not his responsibility.
 
Questions:
Does anyone have any idea how many children does this young lady have?
Are the children teenagers or pre teens?
Hypothetical cost of a meal for 4 at McDonald's:
1. 4 Big Macs $21.96
2. 4 Large French fries $15.96
3. 4 Large Cokes $4.00
Total before taxes: $42.92
So, why not have him pay child support for all the kids? Where do you draw the line? Does he have to buy shoes for all kids? There are examples of this being a problem. Does he have to buy all the kids clothes? There are examples of this being a problem. Does he have to take all the kids to the amusement park? There are examples of this being a problem.

He shouldn't have to pay for that woman's decisions. Nor should his resources intended for his son be split and used for another man's children.
 
That sounds like the republicans and their no abortions no matter what.


Her husband died so remarried and got divorced ...multiple baby daddies

She believed the dude when he said he loved her and they would be together forever....He lied and said what he had to to get the skins

Don't have multiple fukked up in-the-head baby daddies.

Guess its easy to put it all on her, immaculate conception and all.
Da Fuq??!! Are you serious???!!!! Someone saying don't have multiple baby daddies sounds republican??

We are truly lost.

7e36359ad6271aedf0b593dbc5cb2a24.gif
 
Da Fuq??!! Are you serious???!!!! Someone saying don't have multiple baby daddies sounds republican??

We are truly lost.

7e36359ad6271aedf0b593dbc5cb2a24.gif


It does since its a blanket statement inferring that having multiple fathers is simply reckless behavior on the mothers part.

There are many valid reasons why there might be multiple fathers that isn't based on the hoodrat stereotype.
 
Listen the other 3 are not his responsibility just like your kids aren't my responsibility.
However, if your kids are even hanging out with my kid and we getting McDonalds, I am gonna get your kids something to eat too.
It is just classic being a human being.

I will agree - THAT - he should have just taken his with him to McDonald's when he was with him.

But the other 3 are not his responsibility.
 
Back
Top