U.S. Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe vs. Wade

There are many interracial children that were aborted or adopted out because of miscegenation laws. We are going to have to adapt to the new environment.


51moM-lp9jL._SX316_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg



vf5xvKEjwhSuJttR4NmVrOGXyrS.jpg


I was talking to a few women that got abortions to coverup side pieces, it is very frequent. We are going to have to accept their frequent adultery. We are going to have to pump 30 oz of sperm into her, her side piece can maybe get 1 oz, this is to make sure the children are yours. This is what lions do, mount the female all day long. You can't tame or domesticate them, so quit trying.

You should do this right after marriage, it is a matter of time before she cheats. Don't shame her, accept the children she has provided you. I would put air tags in her purse or hack her phone to know her whereabout at all time. Just treat the adultery and having another man children as her ending the marriage, or giving you divorce papers.
 
ROE v WADE is over bro. Why are you upset? Are you a woman who enjoys abortions?
The libertines act like they are not familiar with the abortion addiction fetishes that a lot of their caucasian queens have. Lack of accountability is disappointing but not surprising because most of those upset in this thread hate themselves and want to be a so-called white man.
 
Shhhh context doesn't matter and overturning Roe has no implications for other established Civil Rights case law that rely on the due process and equal protection clauses. You're just a hwhite woman defender! :lol:

Abortion was an established Civil Rights case with 50 years of precedent & this conservative court overturned it.

Here is your Uncle Clarence Thomas explicitly calling for the court to overturn:
  1. Griswold (contraception)
  2. Lawrence (same-sex sexual intercourse)
  3. Obergefell (gay marriage)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWBkDrzWAAIg5rR?format=png&name=900x900


“For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any sub.stantive due process decision is"demonstrably erroneous,Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. (2020) (THOMAS, J concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to"correct the error" established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, 587 U. S.(2019) (THOMAS, J., concurring) (slip op., at 9). After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have gene

The most critical aspect of this ruling:
SCOTUS just declared that there are no implicit rights from the constitution. There are only explicit rights that can be enforced. This greatly reduces the freedom of ALL American citizens.

But hey bruh, keep cooning.
 
:lol:Man this thread is crazy. You got people talking 'bout "What aren't y'all worried about Black problems?" as if this won't affect Black women or we can't be concerned with more than 1 issue at a time.

Someone posted a video from Candace "I's One of The Good Ones" Owens like she dropped some knowledge.

Oh, can't forget about Silverhawk & Supersav taking turns swinging from each other's nuts.

It's wild on these BGOL streets man.
 
:lol:Man this thread is crazy. You got people talking 'bout "What aren't y'all worried about Black problems?" as if this won't affect Black women or we can't be concerned with more than 1 issue at a time.

Someone posted a video from Candace "I's One of The Good Ones" Owens like she dropped some knowledge.

Oh, can't forget about Silverhawk & Supersav taking turns swinging from each other's nuts.

It's wild on these BGOL streets man.
Wild as hell :lol:
 
:lol:Man this thread is crazy. You got people talking 'bout "What aren't y'all worried about Black problems?" as if this won't affect Black women or we can't be concerned with more than 1 issue at a time.

Someone posted a video from Candace "I's One of The Good Ones" Owens like she dropped some knowledge.

Oh, can't forget about Silverhawk & Supersav taking turns swinging from each other's nuts.

It's wild on these BGOL streets man.

What did the US do before 1974?
 
:lol:Man this thread is crazy. You got people talking 'bout "What aren't y'all worried about Black problems?" as if this won't affect Black women or we can't be concerned with more than 1 issue at a time.

Someone posted a video from Candace "I's One of The Good Ones" Owens like she dropped some knowledge.

Oh, can't forget about Silverhawk & Supersav taking turns swinging from each other's nuts.

It's wild on these BGOL streets man.
 
In 1956, I shall not go to the polls. I have not registered. I believe that democracy has so far disappeared in the United States that no “two evils” exist. There is but one evil party with two names, and it will be elected despite all I can do or say. There is no third party. On the Presidential ballot in a few states (seventeen in 1952), a “Socialist” Party will appear. Few will hear its appeal because it will have almost no opportunity to take part in the campaign and explain its platform. If a voter organizes or advocates a real third-party movement, he may be accused of seeking to overthrow this government by “force and violence.” Anything he advocates by way of significant reform will be called “Communist” and will of necessity be Communist in the sense that it must advocate such things as government ownership of the means of production; government in business; the limitation of private profit; social medicine, government housing and federal aid to education; the total abolition of race bias; and the welfare state. These things are on every Communist program; these things are the aim of socialism. Any American who advocates them today, no matter how sincerely, stands in danger of losing his job, surrendering his social status and perhaps landing in jail. The witnesses against him may be liars or insane or criminals. These witnesses need give no proof for their charges and may not even be known or appear in person. They may be in the pay of the United States Government
 
Abortion was an established Civil Rights case with 50 years of precedent & this conservative court overturned it.

Here is your Uncle Clarence Thomas explicitly calling for the court to overturn:
  1. Griswold (contraception)
  2. Lawrence (same-sex sexual intercourse)
  3. Obergefell (gay marriage)
:hmm: :hmm: :hmm: I'm curious to see his reaction if Loving vs. the State of Virginia, or any other cases relating to interracial relationships were to "come up for review".
 
Back
Top