BREAKING: INVASION HAS BEGUN..... Putin's "3-day war"... NOW... 1 YEAR 338 DAYS ...WAGNER HEAD SAYS GROUP STANDING DOWN AFTER CLAIMS OF DEAL
- Thread starter lightbright
- Start date
Kremlin Veteran: They Will Overthrow Putin Before Giving Him Bad News
U.S. intelligence officers are warning Putin is “angry” and “frustrated” that Russia has failed to rapidly seize Ukraine’s capitol city.
Russian insider and Putin critic Andrei Kozyrev, who served as the Russian Foreign Minister from 1991 to 1996, joins MSNBC’s Ari Melber to discuss Putin’s state of mind and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
U.S. intelligence officers are warning Putin is “angry” and “frustrated” that Russia has failed to rapidly seize Ukraine’s capitol city.
Russian insider and Putin critic Andrei Kozyrev, who served as the Russian Foreign Minister from 1991 to 1996, joins MSNBC’s Ari Melber to discuss Putin’s state of mind and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
How African countries voted on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
By Carlos Mureithi
East Africa correspondent
Published March 7, 2022
qz.com
Africans are criticizing their governments for abstaining from the United Nations vote condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
On Mar. 2, 17 African countries abstained from the UN General Assembly vote, representing almost half of all countries that sat on the fence. Eritrea, on the other hand, was the only African country that voted against the resolution, joining Belarus, North Korea, Russia, and Syria.
The resolution, which says it deplores Russia’s “aggression against Ukraine,” was passed at an emergency gathering of the UN General Assembly. It was voted on by 141 of the body’s 193 member states, with 35 members of the UN General Assembly abstaining from it.
The vote means the UN has declared Russia’s invasion of Ukraine a violation of the UN Charter, the foundational treaty of the global body.
General Assembly resolutions are non-binding but they have political weight. Therefore, the vote represents a symbolic victory for Ukraine.
The vote also indicates division among African countries on the Russia-Ukraine war. While some have strongly condemned Russia’s invasion, most have remained quiet. The African Union on its part has asked Russia to respect international law and Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Social media users criticized African countries for abstaining from the vote.
Some of the abstaining countries have defended their decision. On Mar. 6, South African president Cyril Ramaphosa said the resolution “did not foreground the call for meaningful engagement” between Russia and Ukraine.
“South Africa expected that the UN resolution would foremost welcome the commencement of dialogue between the parties and seek to create the conditions for these talks to succeed,” he said.
“Instead, the call for peaceful resolution through political dialogue is relegated to a single sentence close to the conclusion of the final text. This does not provide the encouragement and international backing that the parties need to continue with their efforts.”
By Carlos Mureithi
East Africa correspondent
Published March 7, 2022
How African countries voted on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
Seventeen African countries abstained from the vote.
qz.com
Africans are criticizing their governments for abstaining from the United Nations vote condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
On Mar. 2, 17 African countries abstained from the UN General Assembly vote, representing almost half of all countries that sat on the fence. Eritrea, on the other hand, was the only African country that voted against the resolution, joining Belarus, North Korea, Russia, and Syria.
The resolution, which says it deplores Russia’s “aggression against Ukraine,” was passed at an emergency gathering of the UN General Assembly. It was voted on by 141 of the body’s 193 member states, with 35 members of the UN General Assembly abstaining from it.
The vote means the UN has declared Russia’s invasion of Ukraine a violation of the UN Charter, the foundational treaty of the global body.
General Assembly resolutions are non-binding but they have political weight. Therefore, the vote represents a symbolic victory for Ukraine.
The vote also indicates division among African countries on the Russia-Ukraine war. While some have strongly condemned Russia’s invasion, most have remained quiet. The African Union on its part has asked Russia to respect international law and Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Social media users criticized African countries for abstaining from the vote.
Some of the abstaining countries have defended their decision. On Mar. 6, South African president Cyril Ramaphosa said the resolution “did not foreground the call for meaningful engagement” between Russia and Ukraine.
“South Africa expected that the UN resolution would foremost welcome the commencement of dialogue between the parties and seek to create the conditions for these talks to succeed,” he said.
“Instead, the call for peaceful resolution through political dialogue is relegated to a single sentence close to the conclusion of the final text. This does not provide the encouragement and international backing that the parties need to continue with their efforts.”
I think Trump didn’t like the idea of the US giving all this money to this place and many of those other countries wasn’t putting in close to that amount.
now was that connected to Russia idk but them dots sho connected
Look at this
Here are the 10 countries with the most NATO spending:
- United States ($6.85 Tn)
- United Kingdom ($655.27 Bn)
- Germany ($491.32 Bn)
- France ($477.05 Bn)
- Italy ($232.81 Bn)
- Canada ($212.77 Bn)
- Turkey ($180.00 Bn)
- Spain ($123.36 Bn)
- Poland ($113.76 Bn)
- Netherlands ($113.60 Bn)
Also you
Is it oochie wally or is it one mic?Seems I say this every day. We were presented with a choice of one or the other, and most people got it right. If you didn't, stay calm. There's always next time.
How African countries voted on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
By Carlos Mureithi
East Africa correspondent
Published March 7, 2022
How African countries voted on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
Seventeen African countries abstained from the vote.
Africans are criticizing their governments for abstaining from the United Nations vote condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
On Mar. 2, 17 African countries abstained from the UN General Assembly vote, representing almost half of all countries that sat on the fence. Eritrea, on the other hand, was the only African country that voted against the resolution, joining Belarus, North Korea, Russia, and Syria.
The resolution, which says it deplores Russia’s “aggression against Ukraine,” was passed at an emergency gathering of the UN General Assembly. It was voted on by 141 of the body’s 193 member states, with 35 members of the UN General Assembly abstaining from it.
The vote means the UN has declared Russia’s invasion of Ukraine a violation of the UN Charter, the foundational treaty of the global body.
General Assembly resolutions are non-binding but they have political weight. Therefore, the vote represents a symbolic victory for Ukraine.
The vote also indicates division among African countries on the Russia-Ukraine war. While some have strongly condemned Russia’s invasion, most have remained quiet. The African Union on its part has asked Russia to respect international law and Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Social media users criticized African countries for abstaining from the vote.
Some of the abstaining countries have defended their decision. On Mar. 6, South African president Cyril Ramaphosa said the resolution “did not foreground the call for meaningful engagement” between Russia and Ukraine.
“South Africa expected that the UN resolution would foremost welcome the commencement of dialogue between the parties and seek to create the conditions for these talks to succeed,” he said.
“Instead, the call for peaceful resolution through political dialogue is relegated to a single sentence close to the conclusion of the final text. This does not provide the encouragement and international backing that the parties need to continue with their efforts.”
What African country is that Sammy Sosa looking mfer on Putin's right running?
How African countries voted on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
By Carlos Mureithi
East Africa correspondent
Published March 7, 2022
How African countries voted on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
Seventeen African countries abstained from the vote.
Africans are criticizing their governments for abstaining from the United Nations vote condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
On Mar. 2, 17 African countries abstained from the UN General Assembly vote, representing almost half of all countries that sat on the fence. Eritrea, on the other hand, was the only African country that voted against the resolution, joining Belarus, North Korea, Russia, and Syria.
The resolution, which says it deplores Russia’s “aggression against Ukraine,” was passed at an emergency gathering of the UN General Assembly. It was voted on by 141 of the body’s 193 member states, with 35 members of the UN General Assembly abstaining from it.
The vote means the UN has declared Russia’s invasion of Ukraine a violation of the UN Charter, the foundational treaty of the global body.
General Assembly resolutions are non-binding but they have political weight. Therefore, the vote represents a symbolic victory for Ukraine.
The vote also indicates division among African countries on the Russia-Ukraine war. While some have strongly condemned Russia’s invasion, most have remained quiet. The African Union on its part has asked Russia to respect international law and Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Social media users criticized African countries for abstaining from the vote.
Some of the abstaining countries have defended their decision. On Mar. 6, South African president Cyril Ramaphosa said the resolution “did not foreground the call for meaningful engagement” between Russia and Ukraine.
“South Africa expected that the UN resolution would foremost welcome the commencement of dialogue between the parties and seek to create the conditions for these talks to succeed,” he said.
“Instead, the call for peaceful resolution through political dialogue is relegated to a single sentence close to the conclusion of the final text. This does not provide the encouragement and international backing that the parties need to continue with their efforts.”
bruh, this pic says it all.
They got Putin looking like Barack Obama
Damn not one Ukrainian voted and they getting tangibles. Makes @Drayonis and @geechiedan little argument look really stupid about now.
Chuckle. Someone once again
Damn not one Ukrainian voted and they getting tangibles. Makes @Drayonis and @geechiedan little argument look really stupid about now.
Foreign aid isn't tangibles. Shit African countries get foreign aid all the time (which is just American goods they have to buy).
Do you actually PAY ATTENTION to this shit or are you just mindlessly trolling??
1. the person making that speech is a republican
2. he's REPEATEDLY said house dems have essentially been blocking it and dragging their feet on it
3. its an issue that republicans have placed a high priority on.
ALL OF THIS YOU SKIP OVER to make some busted ass point about how ukrainians are getting tangibles over blacks and its the dems fault.
Dude works for Republicans full time on this board. Shows up every election to convince black folks not to vote - (poof. Reparations)
I can point you to videos on Youtube showing this is the case. The fact they installed this Jewish/President Obama like figure and readily discussed his tragic family history is a red flag to refute accusations.
Victoria Nuland said fuck the EU, who was hesitant to get involved with Nazis, we are proceeding with our plans. This was based on leaked tapes. Zelenskyy is scum that setup President Trump for impeachment after showing favoritism toward Putin. He refused to cooperate with the DOJ investigation into President Biden to entrap President Trump with threatening his military aid. What is next, missile attacks against Air Force One, that a head of state of another country in concert with the President political rival plots? This is a sign of weakness that can not be tolerated.
Oleh Tyahnybok: member of the Verkhovna Rada and the leader of nationalist Svoboda political party
Oleh Tyahnybok - Wikipedia
Although much of the more extreme content has now been removed from Svoboda’s leaflets, the European Parliament passed a resolution on Ukraine in 2012 that asked Kiev not to associate with the party on account of its “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic views.”
2012/2889(RSP) - 13/12/2012 - Resolution on the situation in Ukraine
European Parliament Legislative Observatory Procedure
oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu
Last edited:
Dude works for Republicans full time on this board. Shows up every election to convince black folks not to vote - (poof. Reparations)
This guy
He has none...so he's just gonna ramble to deflect from the point you madeAll them gifs dont cover up the fact that you didnt post a proper rebuttal and example.
I can point you to videos on Youtube showing this is the case. The fact they installed this Jewish/President Obama like figure and readily discussed his tragic family history is a red flag to refute accusations.
Victoria Nuland said fuck the EU, who was hesitant to get involved with Nazis, we are proceeding with our plans. This was based on leaked tapes. Zelenskyy is scum that setup President Trump for impeachment after showing favoritism toward Putin. He refused to cooperate with the DOJ investigation into President Biden to entrap President Trump with threatening his military aid. What is next, missile attacks against Air Force One, that a head of state of another country in concert with the President political rival plots? This is a sign of weakness that can not be tolerated.
Oleh Tyahnybok: member of the Verkhovna Rada and the leader of nationalist Svoboda political party
Oleh Tyahnybok - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Although much of the more extreme content has now been removed from Svoboda’s leaflets, the European Parliament passed a resolution on Ukraine in 2012 that asked Kiev not to associate with the party on account of its “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic views.”
2012/2889(RSP) - 13/12/2012 - Resolution on the situation in Ukraine
European Parliament Legislative Observatory Procedureoeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu
These sanctions against Russia, are really to silence Putin which links back to the black/hispanic community. When they mention Neo-Nazis, while a native Russian speaking, Jewish President is in power, they get nervous. This strategy was used against the black community with President Obama/Michelle, while Nazi are running around terrorizing me.
The Russian interpreting these sanctions as the West trying to destroy them would be wrong, it is to chill out their rhetoric which has far reaching implications in the U.S. than the Russians may understand.
I can point you to videos on Youtube showing this is the case. The fact they installed this Jewish/President Obama like figure and readily discussed his tragic family history is a red flag to refute accusations.
Victoria Nuland said fuck the EU, who was hesitant to get involved with Nazis, we are proceeding with our plans. This was based on leaked tapes. Zelenskyy is scum that setup President Trump for impeachment after showing favoritism toward Putin. He refused to cooperate with the DOJ investigation into President Biden to entrap President Trump with threatening his military aid. What is next, missile attacks against Air Force One, that a head of state of another country in concert with the President political rival plots? This is a sign of weakness that can not be tolerated.
Oleh Tyahnybok: member of the Verkhovna Rada and the leader of nationalist Svoboda political party
Oleh Tyahnybok - Wikipedia
Although much of the more extreme content has now been removed from Svoboda’s leaflets, the European Parliament passed a resolution on Ukraine in 2012 that asked Kiev not to associate with the party on account of its “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic views.”
2012/2889(RSP) - 13/12/2012 - Resolution on the situation in Ukraine
European Parliament Legislative Observatory Procedureoeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu
None of that even comes close to proving that Putin is there to remove the Nazi element in Ukraine.
In fact none of that even addresses the issue.
Are you one of those guys who believed Putin when he said he was only conducting training exercises?
Multiple comrades putting together 11 post combos lol bgol is op heaven
Similar threads
