Let me ask you what is the point of posting a story like this story? How is this beneficial? Does this provide any insight for value to the thread?
"WW C"- COVID-19, GLOBAL CASES SURPASS 676 MILLION...CASES 676,609,955 DEATHS 6,881,955 US CASES 103,804,263 US DEATHS 1,123,836 8:30pm 1/28/24
- Thread starter lightbright
- Start date
-
- Tags
- vaccination
Let me ask you what is the point of posting a story like this story? How is this beneficial? Does this provide any insight for value to the thread?
Let me tell you to shut the fuck up......if you know my line of work on this broad you know exactly why I posted this...And excused my language if you get offended
Last edited:
UR CLAIMS ARE NOT FACTS !!
u made a claim of (gain of function research for covid19 that insinuate its where the CV19 virus emanates ) that u cant backup but instead of substantiating ur claims u move the goalpost when asked to provide the proof,
i can do the same too, check this..
my claims "there were 3 aliens who gave a new covid serum to the NYU hospital and they claim u can grow an extra 5 inch taller in 24hr if u drink it .. dont ask me to provide proof just accept it!!
and since u ask i already answered in my response ^
FYI : gain of function is a standard research practice that doesnt proof what ure trying to insinuate , stop !! christ!!
Yea I assumed you wouldnt have a legitimate reason
Positive cases have plateaued at about 70,000 daily..... according to Faucci..... far above where we should be at now.....All key metrics have been falling dramatically, there is no indication that a "wave" is coming. 18% of US Pop has been vaccinated and that number grow everyday. Another 25% has had the infection and may have some for of antibody. Then there is this theory. . .
COVID-19 could become a seasonal illness like the flu, experts say
It is possible, experts say, that COVID-19 could become a seasonal illness, like the flu.abcnews.go.com
.
They actually are around 40,000Positive cases have plateaued at about 70,000 daily..... according to Faucci..... far above where we should be at now.....
.
And I assume you don’t know how to read
I'm done bad faith actor. Get the fuck out of here I'm not going to spoon-feed you the fucking information you want. I don't work for you lil' nigga. , all that time you spent bitching you could have been looking the shit up seeing ass you are on the internet already. Literally just start typing in the browser on chrome. So, explain gain of function you funky bitch or get out of my sight. What are you hiding from?UR CLAIMS ARE NOT FACTS !!
u made a claim of (gain of function research for covid19 that insinuate its where the CV19 virus emanates ) that u cant backup but instead of substantiating ur claims u move the goalpost when asked to provide the proof,
i can do the same too, check this..
my claims "there were 3 aliens who gave a new covid serum to the NYU hospital and they claim u can grow an extra 5 inch taller in 24hr if u drink it .. dont ask me to provide proof just accept it!!
and since u ask i already answered in my response ^
FYI : gain of function is a standard research practice that doesnt proof what ure trying to insinuate , stop !! christ!!
once again in my last response
(FYI : gain of function is a standard research practice that doesnt proof what ure trying to insinuate ,)
i stated what gain of function is in the research field.. right there ^^^
just cause u dont understand what something means , doesnt mean others dont, and when u use a term and concept disingenuously to make a claim and are then asked to back ur claim as it pertains to the concept and u come up with more deflections !!
im not the one on the stand ! u are ! u made a claim i asked for u to back it up & u cant but came with more deflections ! and im the bad faith actor ??? how ?
SOOOO.... U GOT NO PROOF AND CANT EVEN DEFINE THE CONCEPT U TRIED TO EXPLAIN UR CLAIM ...
anyway i got a new batch from the alien who gave me the covid19 serum and i cant prove it works but send me $20 real quick and u can sell it for $200 for a $180 profit ! cool ? The bug eyes aliens said he takes venmo so ..
Agent
once again in my last response
(FYI : gain of function is a standard research practice that doesnt proof what ure trying to insinuate ,)
i stated what gain of function is in the research field.. right there ^^^
just cause u dont understand what something means , doesnt mean others dont, and when u use a term and concept disingenuously to make a claim and are then asked to back ur claim as it pertains to the concept and u come up with more deflections !!
im not the one on the stand ! u are ! u made a claim i asked for u to back it up & u cant but came with more deflections ! and im the bad faith actor ??? how ?
SOOOO.... U GOT NO PROOF AND CANT EVEN DEFINE THE CONCEPT U TRIED TO EXPLAIN UR CLAIM ...
anyway i got a new batch from the alien who gave me the covid19 serum and i cant prove it works but send me $20 real quick and u can sell it for $200 for a $180 profit ! cool ? The bug eyes aliens said he takes venmo so ..
This thing, whatever it is, just spent like 3 paragraphs running in circles.
Russian Disinformation Campaign Aims to Undermine Confidence in Pfizer, Other Covid-19 Vaccines, U.S. Officials Say
Websites linked to Russian intelligence services publish false information questioning vaccines’ safety, efficacy
WASHINGTON—Russian intelligence agencies have mounted a campaign to undermine confidence in Pfizer Inc.’s and other Western vaccines, using online publications that in recent months have questioned the vaccines’ development and safety, U.S. officials said.
An official with the State Department’s Global Engagement Center, which monitors foreign disinformation efforts, identified four publications that he said have served as fronts for Russian intelligence.
The websites played up the vaccines’ risk of side effects, questioned their efficacy, and said the U.S. had rushed the Pfizer vaccine through the approval process, among other false or misleading claims.
Though the outlets’ readership is small, U.S. officials say they inject false narratives that can be amplified by other Russian and international media.
CONTINUED:
Russian Disinformation Campaign Aims to Undermine Confidence in Pfizer, Other Covid-19 Vaccines, U.S. Officials Say - WSJ
Websites linked to Russian intelligence services publish false information questioning vaccines’ safety, efficacy
WASHINGTON—Russian intelligence agencies have mounted a campaign to undermine confidence in Pfizer Inc.’s and other Western vaccines, using online publications that in recent months have questioned the vaccines’ development and safety, U.S. officials said.
An official with the State Department’s Global Engagement Center, which monitors foreign disinformation efforts, identified four publications that he said have served as fronts for Russian intelligence.
The websites played up the vaccines’ risk of side effects, questioned their efficacy, and said the U.S. had rushed the Pfizer vaccine through the approval process, among other false or misleading claims.
Though the outlets’ readership is small, U.S. officials say they inject false narratives that can be amplified by other Russian and international media.
CONTINUED:
Russian Disinformation Campaign Aims to Undermine Confidence in Pfizer, Other Covid-19 Vaccines, U.S. Officials Say - WSJ
I wonder also do they post misinfo on severe adverse allergic reactions and even deaths,let me know.
Positive cases have plateaued at about 70,000 daily..... according to Faucci..... far above where we should be at now.....
.
nah the 7-day avg is at 57k and all key metrics are falling. Dont take my word for it the Washington Post is tracking go look for yourself.
OPINION
Look at number of people dying post-vaccination: Efficacy number that matters
People aren’t only worried about dying from Covid; they’re also worried about getting so-called long Covid and transmitting the disease to others even after they’re vaccinated.
A nurse draws a Moderna coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine, at East Valley Community Health Center in La Puente, California, US. (REUTERS)
OPINION
Look at number of people dying post-vaccination: Efficacy number that matters
People aren’t only worried about dying from Covid; they’re also worried about getting so-called long Covid and transmitting the disease to others even after they’re vaccinated.
Bloomberg
PUBLISHED ON MAR 07, 2021 07:10 PM IST
Something sounds fishy when public health experts advise us to take whatever vaccine is available even though some vaccines show much more promising efficacy numbers than others. And it’s understandable that people would want to shop for the best vaccine. Americans are accustomed to the idea of consumer choice in pharmaceuticals — why else would we have so much direct-to-consumer drug advertising? But cut through the noise and there’s only one thing that really matters: all three FDA-authorized vaccines seem to work equally well — close to 100% — at preventing hospitalization and death.
That message has gotten diluted in the reporting around the efficacy numbers for different vaccines. The efficacy numbers associated with the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines came in at around 95%, while the newly approved Johnson & Johnson vaccine has shown a less impressive 72% in the US, and even lower in other countries. As risk communication expert Peter Sandman says, people remember from school that 95% usually earns and A, and 72% a C at best.
The problem is that numbers most touted to measure “efficacy” measure various degrees of symptoms plus a positive test — criteria that vary some from trial to trial. They don’t measure what’s most important: protection against hospitalization and death.
And on that score, all three vaccines are outstanding. So public health experts are justified in suggesting people take the first vaccine available.
People aren’t only worried about dying from Covid; they’re also worried about getting so-called long Covid and transmitting the disease to others even after they’re vaccinated. There’s no data one way or the other one whether vaccination cuts the risk of long Covid for those who get sick, but all the vaccines appear to reduce the number of people who get mild illness or asymptomatic cases, and thereby probably reduce transmission.
While the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines work the same way, Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine works through a different mechanism. The first two use messenger RNA, and the latter uses DNA, which is ferried to the nucleus of cells with a different kind of virus, called an adenovirus, modified so it can’t replicate itself and cause disease. All three vaccines have good safety data, and all of them prompt the body to produce T-cells, which retain a sort of memory of the protein and attack it.
One reason for the seemingly stark difference in efficacy numbers is that the clinical trials were held in very different groups of people. The Johnson & Johnson trial enrolled more people with hypertension, diabetes and HIV, as well as more people over 60, says University of California infectious disease doctor Monica Gandhi. Johnson and Johnson’s results also came from testing people in South Africa and Latin America at a time when new variants of the virus were already rampant. The important thing to note, says Gandhi, is that nobody who got the vaccine in the clinical trials — for any of the shots — was hospitalized for Covid-19. None of them died. None even got a severe enough case to require medical intervention at all.
The absence of hospitalizations and deaths in the Johnson and Johnson trial looks even more impressive given that the volunteers included people who were more vulnerable to dying from the virus. Gandhi says she’d advise her own 80-something parents to get that shot if it was the first one available.
Earlier this year, Yale University epidemiologist Robert Hecht had told me in an interview that he thought more lives could be saved by vaccinating people in so-called hot spots where there was an unusually high burden of disease. I called him back and asked whether the single-shot advantage of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine might make it a good choice for those places. He agreed it would, but worried about the perception that it’s an inferior vaccine, which could incite outrage about racial or socioeconomic injustice.
Other experts are also wrestling with this question, since the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is cheaper than the other approved shots, delivered in a single dose, and requires only ordinary refrigeration rather than ultra-cold storage. That would make it a practical choice for vaccinating homeless people, and those in hard-to-reach rural areas, but again, experts are wrestling with the perception of inequality.
That concern isn’t justified, given a proper interpretation of the data. Even the perception of unfairness, though, could be harmful. Giving people the ability to vaccine-shop might help more hesitant people feel more in control and less coerced — but also inadvertently prolong the pandemic.
Getting the one-shot vaccine out as fast as possible and focusing on virus hot spots would save lives and hasten a return to some level of normal life. It’s now up to the public health community to send out a clearer message and get the public on board.
The most important numbers here aren't 95% or 72%, but 0%: the number of vaccinated people who've died from the virus. When that's the emphasis, the message to get the first available vaccine makes a lot more sense.
Look at number of people dying post-vaccination: Efficacy number that matters
People aren’t only worried about dying from Covid; they’re also worried about getting so-called long Covid and transmitting the disease to others even after they’re vaccinated.
So why you posting fake shit now?
OPINION
Look at number of people dying post-vaccination: Efficacy number that matters
People aren’t only worried about dying from Covid; they’re also worried about getting so-called long Covid and transmitting the disease to others even after they’re vaccinated.
A nurse draws a Moderna coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine, at East Valley Community Health Center in La Puente, California, US. (REUTERS)
OPINION
Look at number of people dying post-vaccination: Efficacy number that matters
People aren’t only worried about dying from Covid; they’re also worried about getting so-called long Covid and transmitting the disease to others even after they’re vaccinated.
Bloomberg
PUBLISHED ON MAR 07, 2021 07:10 PM IST
Something sounds fishy when public health experts advise us to take whatever vaccine is available even though some vaccines show much more promising efficacy numbers than others. And it’s understandable that people would want to shop for the best vaccine. Americans are accustomed to the idea of consumer choice in pharmaceuticals — why else would we have so much direct-to-consumer drug advertising? But cut through the noise and there’s only one thing that really matters: all three FDA-authorized vaccines seem to work equally well — close to 100% — at preventing hospitalization and death.
That message has gotten diluted in the reporting around the efficacy numbers for different vaccines. The efficacy numbers associated with the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines came in at around 95%, while the newly approved Johnson & Johnson vaccine has shown a less impressive 72% in the US, and even lower in other countries. As risk communication expert Peter Sandman says, people remember from school that 95% usually earns and A, and 72% a C at best.
The problem is that numbers most touted to measure “efficacy” measure various degrees of symptoms plus a positive test — criteria that vary some from trial to trial. They don’t measure what’s most important: protection against hospitalization and death.
And on that score, all three vaccines are outstanding. So public health experts are justified in suggesting people take the first vaccine available.
People aren’t only worried about dying from Covid; they’re also worried about getting so-called long Covid and transmitting the disease to others even after they’re vaccinated. There’s no data one way or the other one whether vaccination cuts the risk of long Covid for those who get sick, but all the vaccines appear to reduce the number of people who get mild illness or asymptomatic cases, and thereby probably reduce transmission.
While the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines work the same way, Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine works through a different mechanism. The first two use messenger RNA, and the latter uses DNA, which is ferried to the nucleus of cells with a different kind of virus, called an adenovirus, modified so it can’t replicate itself and cause disease. All three vaccines have good safety data, and all of them prompt the body to produce T-cells, which retain a sort of memory of the protein and attack it.
One reason for the seemingly stark difference in efficacy numbers is that the clinical trials were held in very different groups of people. The Johnson & Johnson trial enrolled more people with hypertension, diabetes and HIV, as well as more people over 60, says University of California infectious disease doctor Monica Gandhi. Johnson and Johnson’s results also came from testing people in South Africa and Latin America at a time when new variants of the virus were already rampant. The important thing to note, says Gandhi, is that nobody who got the vaccine in the clinical trials — for any of the shots — was hospitalized for Covid-19. None of them died. None even got a severe enough case to require medical intervention at all.
The absence of hospitalizations and deaths in the Johnson and Johnson trial looks even more impressive given that the volunteers included people who were more vulnerable to dying from the virus. Gandhi says she’d advise her own 80-something parents to get that shot if it was the first one available.
Earlier this year, Yale University epidemiologist Robert Hecht had told me in an interview that he thought more lives could be saved by vaccinating people in so-called hot spots where there was an unusually high burden of disease. I called him back and asked whether the single-shot advantage of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine might make it a good choice for those places. He agreed it would, but worried about the perception that it’s an inferior vaccine, which could incite outrage about racial or socioeconomic injustice.
Other experts are also wrestling with this question, since the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is cheaper than the other approved shots, delivered in a single dose, and requires only ordinary refrigeration rather than ultra-cold storage. That would make it a practical choice for vaccinating homeless people, and those in hard-to-reach rural areas, but again, experts are wrestling with the perception of inequality.
That concern isn’t justified, given a proper interpretation of the data. Even the perception of unfairness, though, could be harmful. Giving people the ability to vaccine-shop might help more hesitant people feel more in control and less coerced — but also inadvertently prolong the pandemic.
Getting the one-shot vaccine out as fast as possible and focusing on virus hot spots would save lives and hasten a return to some level of normal life. It’s now up to the public health community to send out a clearer message and get the public on board.
The most important numbers here aren't 95% or 72%, but 0%: the number of vaccinated people who've died from the virus. When that's the emphasis, the message to get the first available vaccine makes a lot more sense.
Look at number of people dying post-vaccination: Efficacy number that matters
People aren’t only worried about dying from Covid; they’re also worried about getting so-called long Covid and transmitting the disease to others even after they’re vaccinated.www.hindustantimes.com
65-year-old Goregaon man collapses in chair, dies after vacc ..
MUMBAI: A 65-year-old Goregaon resident collapsed within min ..
Read more at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
@HNIC can we stop him from posting obviously fake information
65-year-old Goregaon man collapses in chair, dies after vacc ..
MUMBAI: A 65-year-old Goregaon resident collapsed within min ..
Read more at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
when asked to back up ur claims , u spent pages running from the basic question with more talking points & parroting more canned keywords!!
and u still havent backed up ur claims !
still want to flog that alien vaccine ? i got the hookup , holla !
Fake shit.???
......This isnt fake shit you dummy........Look at the top of the article and you will see it says opinion.Its just a opinion, even the New York Times itself has at least one opinion page all accredited news sources just about has a opinion page.The news source itself is accredited.
Enough is enough. Time for you to take a vacation from BGOlFake shit.???
What is the matter with you.?All im doing is reporting coincidental deaths.i didnt never say one time it was the vaccine that caused any deaths.theres nothing wrong with that.
I've said this before.....
All the Black anti vaxx people in here need to ask themselves why white people are sneaking into Black and Hispanic neighborhoods to get vaccinated.
Suburban retirees drive in for life-saving shots, while city Spanish speakers rely on a reporter to translate the message: Call yet again to get an appointment.
Suburban retirees drive in for life-saving shots, while city Spanish speakers rely on a reporter to translate the message: Call yet again to get an appointment.www.thecity.nyc
White folks are scared of the virus more than they distrust the vaccine.blacks and latinos fear the vaccine more than the virus because of history.
Amazon product ASIN 076791547X
The first full history of Black America’s shocking mistreatment as unwilling and unwitting experimental subjects at the hands of the medical establishment. No one concerned with issues of public health and racial justice can afford not to read this masterful book that will stir up both controversy and long-needed debate.
its not easy to trust a society that has a long standing history of fucking you over.especially when it's still happening in all areas of life.white folks been experimented on as well but when the narrative as well as the reality reflects you've been treated better on the whole then you become more trusting.You end up in black and latinos hoods getting vaccine shots because your fear and trust
Dictate it's a logical move whether or not it actually is.
Last edited:
Even with vaccinations available, these idiots still can't get it right. Make da shit available for every fuckin' body. Shit.
If nothing else, it's time to move on to other phases. People in the early phases of distribution (whatever they are for a given state) have had ample time and opportunity to get vaccinated. At least so far as I have seen. Time to move onto to the next group that wants it.
To much information and misinformation out there right now that will make your head spin. I know everyone wants to get back to normal but this mad rush to do it will have consequences in the long run. Yesterday I lost a co worker to the virus he thought even though he got both shots he was good he went to a family reunion in Florida and from what his wife has told us him and other family members caught it and he was the 6th one to pass from it. I have lost to many family members and friends to this shit include my mother.
If he got both shots I am almost 1000% sure it was MIS that killed him
Nurse found dead from blood clots after getting this COVID-19 vaccine
Authorities in Austria have stopped vaccinations with a batch of AstraZeneca's inoculation against the coronavirus, after one person died and another became seriously ill after receiving their jabs.
“The Federal Office for Safety in Health Care (BASG) has received two reports in a temporal connection with a vaccination from the same batch of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the district clinic of Zwettl” in Lower Austria province, the local health authority said.
“Currently there is no evidence of a causal relationship with the vaccination,” the BASG said, adding that it would now investigate the incidents further.
A 49-year-old woman died as a result of severe coagulation disorders, an illness related to the blood’s ability to clot.
The woman was admitted to the intensive care unit of Vienna General Hospital last weekend after initially being treated at a hospital in Lower Austria. A day after being admitted, the woman died.
“The woman received the first partial vaccination of a Covid19 vaccine ten days before hospital admission,” a spokesperson for the Vienna hospital told the Niederoesterreichische Nachrichten.
Meanwhile, a 35-year-old female developed a pulmonary embolism and is now recovering. A pulmonary embolism is a lung disease that is caused by a dislodged blood clot.
Several local news organization reported that both women were nurses working at the local hospital.
Anton Heinzl, from the centre-left said that “we have to wait for the results of the inquiry. After all, it is an approved vaccine. We first have to see if there is a connection with these cases.”
The far-right FPÖ said on Saturday that “until a connection can be ruled out with certainty, vaccinations with the AstraZeneca vaccine must be suspended with immediate effect.”
Could you please stop flooding a thread about Covid rates and information with these post.
Nurse found dead from blood clots after getting this COVID-19 vaccine
Authorities in Austria have stopped vaccinations with a batch of AstraZeneca's inoculation against the coronavirus, after one person died and another became seriously ill after receiving their jabs.
“The Federal Office for Safety in Health Care (BASG) has received two reports in a temporal connection with a vaccination from the same batch of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the district clinic of Zwettl” in Lower Austria province, the local health authority said.
“Currently there is no evidence of a causal relationship with the vaccination,” the BASG said, adding that it would now investigate the incidents further.
A 49-year-old woman died as a result of severe coagulation disorders, an illness related to the blood’s ability to clot.
The woman was admitted to the intensive care unit of Vienna General Hospital last weekend after initially being treated at a hospital in Lower Austria. A day after being admitted, the woman died.
“The woman received the first partial vaccination of a Covid19 vaccine ten days before hospital admission,” a spokesperson for the Vienna hospital told the Niederoesterreichische Nachrichten.
Meanwhile, a 35-year-old female developed a pulmonary embolism and is now recovering. A pulmonary embolism is a lung disease that is caused by a dislodged blood clot.
Several local news organization reported that both women were nurses working at the local hospital.
Anton Heinzl, from the centre-left said that “we have to wait for the results of the inquiry. After all, it is an approved vaccine. We first have to see if there is a connection with these cases.”
The far-right FPÖ said on Saturday that “until a connection can be ruled out with certainty, vaccinations with the AstraZeneca vaccine must be suspended with immediate effect.”
US airlines call for vaccine passports to help restart travel
Airlines are asking the White House to develop federal guidance for temporary health credentials that would keep track of travelers' negative COVID tests and proof of vaccination.
Airlines are asking the White House to develop federal guidance for temporary health credentials that would keep track of travelers' negative COVID tests and proof of vaccination.
What is wrong with you.? We are not at the beginning of the pandemic stages no more.We are in the vaccine stage now.What is the matter with you.Why cant coincidental deaths be reported.Why cant articles be posted on coincidental deaths.Come on man.