Comedy: Damn! D.L. Hughley on Argument with Bill Cosby: "I Use the N-Word But I Don't Rape Girls"

Bill Cosby Would Rather Serve 10 Years in Prison Than Show Remorse
By Amanda Arnold@aMandolinz
26-bill-cosby.w700.h467.jpg
Bill Cosby Photo: Mark Makela/Getty Images

If a convicted sex offender wants to be considered for parole, they must typically, according to legal experts, be willing to show remorse for their actions. Comedian Bill Cosby, who was convicted on three charges of felony aggravated indecent assault and classified as a “sexually violent predator” last year, says he would rather serve his full ten-year prison sentence than do so.

Cosby, 82, recently made this point explicitly clear in an interview from his prison cell with the National Newspaper Publishers Association’s BlackPressUSA.com, the first he’s given since his high-profile trial concluded over a year ago. In April 2018, a grand jury found him guilty of the three assault charges for drugging and sexually assaulting Temple University director of basketball operations Andrea Constand at his home in 2004. Then, in September 2018, the comedian was sentenced to three to ten years in prison.

“When I come up for parole, they’re not going to hear me say that I have remorse,” Cosby told the website. “I was there. I don’t care what group of people come along and talk about this when they weren’t there. They don’t know.”
This past June, Cosby filed a formal appeal arguing that his criminal conviction was flawed because the judge had considered the “strikingly dissimilar” testimonies of five of his other accusers, whom prosecutors called on to bolster Constand’s claims that Cosby is a sexual predator. (Though Cosby was only convicted for sexually assaulting Constand, more than 60 additional women have accused him of rape or sexual assault. However, the statue of limitations had expired in the majority of their cases. Cosby maintains his innocence.)

“It’s all a set-up,” Cosby told the outlet of his conviction. “That whole jury thing. They were imposters.”

If Cosby’s appeal is rejected, then that’s that; he’ll likely be serving the remaining eight years and nine months of his maximum sentence. But this possibility doesn’t appear to faze him. In the interview, Cosby said he’s been in relatively high spirits since starting his sentence, and that he even has a nickname for his jail cell: “my penthouse.”
 
The Cosby trial was a sham and unfortunately he didn't receive the support from the Black community that he should have received because he had the audacity to have an opinion that didn't sit well with the Black community.
 
The Cosby trial was a sham and unfortunately he didn't receive the support from the Black community that he should have received because he had the audacity to have an opinion that didn't sit well with the Black community.

So he didn’t rape?
 
So he didn’t rape?

Nope. He clearly had a fetish for drugs and sex but fuck no. Do you honestly believe the biggest rapist in American History is Bill Cosby? (lol) What's ironic is how a bunch of racist, White Conservatives didn't believe he was guilty yet many in the Black community did. Check it.

1) Beverly Johnson said he "tried" to rape her. He offered her coffee and she "immediately" knew she had been drug. Stupid bitch. That drug doesn't work that way. There's no "immediate" response. The narrative doesn't fit. Immediately my ass.

2) Most, if not all, his alleged victims said they were given alcohol with the drugs. The issue? Ludes and alcohol don't fuckin' mix. First off it would take a SHITLOAD of the drug to render someone unconscious or to get to the state where they assert they had no control over themselves. Most important is the fact that they all had the same story yet you don't have any evidence one ONE, not ONE experiencing and adverse event due to alcohol being introduced. Not one person became ill when the drugs profile clearly states what could happen when combined with alcohol? This leads me to believe that if he did give them the drug (which he could have done), he gave it to them in a LOW dose. A recreational dose. A consensual dose for the sole purpose of having sex.

He didn't rape anyone. They were there to exploit his fame. Had Hannibal Burress' monkey ass never cracked that joke he'd be free today. We will overlook the legal fact that he gave the deposition (where he told the truth) under the premise that he wouldn't be charged. His legal team failed him. The system changed the rules along the way to convict him. You would never see that happen to a White man. Every heard of William "Kennedy" Smith? He was charged with rape. Where is he? Still practicing medicine.
 
Nope. He clearly had a fetish for drugs and sex but fuck no. Do you honestly believe the biggest rapist in American History is Bill Cosby? (lol) What's ironic is how a bunch of racist, White Conservatives didn't believe he was guilty yet many in the Black community did. Check it.

1) Beverly Johnson said he "tried" to rape her. He offered her coffee and she "immediately" knew she had been drug. Stupid bitch. That drug doesn't work that way. There's no "immediate" response. The narrative doesn't fit. Immediately my ass.

2) Most, if not all, his alleged victims said they were given alcohol with the drugs. The issue? Ludes and alcohol don't fuckin' mix. First off it would take a SHITLOAD of the drug to render someone unconscious or to get to the state where they assert they had no control over themselves. Most important is the fact that they all had the same story yet you don't have any evidence one ONE, not ONE experiencing and adverse event due to alcohol being introduced. Not one person became ill when the drugs profile clearly states what could happen when combined with alcohol? This leads me to believe that if he did give them the drug (which he could have done), he gave it to them in a LOW dose. A recreational dose. A consensual dose for the sole purpose of having sex.

He didn't rape anyone. They were there to exploit his fame. Had Hannibal Burress' monkey ass never cracked that joke he'd be free today. We will overlook the legal fact that he gave the deposition (where he told the truth) under the premise that he wouldn't be charged. His legal team failed him. The system changed the rules along the way to convict him. You would never see that happen to a White man. Every heard of William "Kennedy" Smith? He was charged with rape. Where is he? Still practicing medicine.

So according to you, DL and everyone that he knows who knows about Cosby and they way he moved\raped is wrong?

Start at 6:20



So they’re all wrong?
 
Nope. He clearly had a fetish for drugs and sex but fuck no. Do you honestly believe the biggest rapist in American History is Bill Cosby? (lol) What's ironic is how a bunch of racist, White Conservatives didn't believe he was guilty yet many in the Black community did. Check it.

1) Beverly Johnson said he "tried" to rape her. He offered her coffee and she "immediately" knew she had been drug. Stupid bitch. That drug doesn't work that way. There's no "immediate" response. The narrative doesn't fit. Immediately my ass.

2) Most, if not all, his alleged victims said they were given alcohol with the drugs. The issue? Ludes and alcohol don't fuckin' mix. First off it would take a SHITLOAD of the drug to render someone unconscious or to get to the state where they assert they had no control over themselves. Most important is the fact that they all had the same story yet you don't have any evidence one ONE, not ONE experiencing and adverse event due to alcohol being introduced. Not one person became ill when the drugs profile clearly states what could happen when combined with alcohol? This leads me to believe that if he did give them the drug (which he could have done), he gave it to them in a LOW dose. A recreational dose. A consensual dose for the sole purpose of having sex.

He didn't rape anyone. They were there to exploit his fame. Had Hannibal Burress' monkey ass never cracked that joke he'd be free today. We will overlook the legal fact that he gave the deposition (where he told the truth) under the premise that he wouldn't be charged. His legal team failed him. The system changed the rules along the way to convict him. You would never see that happen to a White man. Every heard of William "Kennedy" Smith? He was charged with rape. Where is he? Still practicing medicine.
:( except Cosby himself admitted to given women drugs under deposition that wasn't supposed to released.
 
:( except Cosby himself admitted to given women drugs under deposition that wasn't supposed to released.

And to be realistic. If 50 people said you raped them, whether you did it or not at some point you’d look into the mirror like

tenor.gif


Thinking “Maybe I did it”?
 
:( except Cosby himself admitted to given women drugs under deposition that wasn't supposed to released.

He also said it was consensual. Again, he did it for nefarious reasons his victims (who voluntarily took the tablets) would have had to avoid choking on the number of pills they would have had to take to get them to where they SAID they were after taking them. Yet they did so. Why?
 
And to be realistic. If 50 people said you raped them, whether you did it or not at some point you’d look into the mirror like

tenor.gif


Thinking “Maybe I did it”?

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. Where were they over the years? None of their stories marry up to what the drug is capable of doing. Explain that first and then entertain the plausibility of rape by drugging, If fifty women claimed you raped them by giving the a tic tac and wine what should we believe. You did because 50 women said so or the fact that a tic tac won't knock your ass out? Fifty accusers are not the science alone raises serious, reasonable doubt. The problem is a jury is comprised of simple folk. Ain't no way a MD or anyone in the pharmaceutical industry would EVER be chosen as a potential juror.
 
So according to you, DL and everyone that he knows who knows about Cosby and they way he moved\raped is wrong?

Start at 6:20



So they’re all wrong?


Are any of those saying they heard the rumors or knew of the incidents advocates of Cosby? There's a STRONGER possibility that there are 5X the number of folks in the industry who have NEVER heard those rumors but we're supposed to give those that do MORE weight. That defies logic. In any other circumstance intelligent muthafuckas would raise the issue I just raised. But because Blacks are pissed off at his comments they're willing to toss logic, science, etc. out the window and go with he/she said. If his case was THAT easy there woudn't have been a hung jury the first time. The DA wouldn't have had tweak things to make it fit. Why wasn't it a slam dunk the first time?
 
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. Where were they over the years? None of their stories marry up to what the drug is capable of doing. Explain that first and then entertain the plausibility of rape by drugging, If fifty women claimed you raped them by giving the a tic tac and wine what should we believe. You did because 50 women said so or the fact that a tic tac won't knock your ass out? Fifty accusers are not the science alone raises serious, reasonable doubt. The problem is a jury is comprised of simple folk. Ain't no way a MD or anyone in the pharmaceutical industry would EVER be chosen as a potential juror.

It was said that Cosby gave women Qualudes. The effects of the drug is below:


At high doses it can cause mental confusion and loss of muscle control (ataxia).

As with most drugs of abuse, it was found that Quaaludes users made poor decisions and lacked normal abilities under its influence.


In prescribed doses, Quaaludes promotes relaxation, sleepiness and sometimes a feeling of euphoria (happiness, calmness). It causes a drop in blood pressure and slows the pulse rate. These properties are the reason why it was initially thought to be a useful sedative and anxiolytic.

It became a recreational drug due to its euphoric ("high") effect. Quaaludes were a popular drug of abuse during much of the 1970s, even though both the US and Britain tightened control around their use and dispensing.

https://www.drugs.com/illicit/quaaludes.html

You’re entitled to believe why you believe, but I’m not riding with Bill on this one.
 
Are any of those saying they heard the rumors or knew of the incidents advocates of Cosby? There's a STRONGER possibility that there are 5X the number of folks in the industry who have NEVER heard those rumors but we're supposed to give those that do MORE weight. That defies logic. In any other circumstance intelligent muthafuckas would raise the issue I just raised. But because Blacks are pissed off at his comments they're willing to toss logic, science, etc. out the window and go with he/she said. If his case was THAT easy there woudn't have been a hung jury the first time. The DA wouldn't have had tweak things to make it fit. Why wasn't it a slam dunk the first time?

I’m not at upset at Cosby and don’t care about what he had to say about Black people. Many said they knew about Cosby and his drugging of women. Are they all mad because Cosby didn’t like their comedy or that he didn’t like them personally? Maybe.

But to blindly be nothing happened is strange.
 
It was said that Cosby gave women Qualudes. The effects of the drug is below:


At high doses it can cause mental confusion and loss of muscle control (ataxia).

As with most drugs of abuse, it was found that Quaaludes users made poor decisions and lacked normal abilities under its influence.


In prescribed doses, Quaaludes promotes relaxation, sleepiness and sometimes a feeling of euphoria (happiness, calmness). It causes a drop in blood pressure and slows the pulse rate. These properties are the reason why it was initially thought to be a useful sedative and anxiolytic.

It became a recreational drug due to its euphoric ("high") effect. Quaaludes were a popular drug of abuse during much of the 1970s, even though both the US and Britain tightened control around their use and dispensing.

https://www.drugs.com/illicit/quaaludes.html

You’re entitled to believe why you believe, but I’m not riding with Bill on this one.
When they say he “gave” women quaaludes what do they mean? He slipped them in their drink? No.

They were common party drugs that people took. Sort of like perc pills or weed today. It would be like in 30 years, when no one knows what a Percocet is, they talk about men giving women muscle relaxants (perc pills) and then taking advantage of them. It totally ignored the context. Women willingly take perc pills to get high, knowing the effects. In the 1979s, women willingly took quaaludes knowing the effects.

He provided recreational drugs to women when they were together, which men have done since the beginning of time.

The women took party drugs with Cosby, fucked, and then regretted it afterwards. Or they wanted a bag, and lied about being raped.
 
It was said that Cosby gave women Qualudes. The effects of the drug is below:


At high doses it can cause mental confusion and loss of muscle control (ataxia).

As with most drugs of abuse, it was found that Quaaludes users made poor decisions and lacked normal abilities under its influence.


In prescribed doses, Quaaludes promotes relaxation, sleepiness and sometimes a feeling of euphoria (happiness, calmness). It causes a drop in blood pressure and slows the pulse rate. These properties are the reason why it was initially thought to be a useful sedative and anxiolytic.

It became a recreational drug due to its euphoric ("high") effect. Quaaludes were a popular drug of abuse during much of the 1970s, even though both the US and Britain tightened control around their use and dispensing.

https://www.drugs.com/illicit/quaaludes.html

You’re entitled to believe why you believe, but I’m not riding with Bill on this one.

Your choice. Nothing I said is contradicted by what you presented. In fact doesn't it look eerily similar. Almost as if I know a little something about drugs, their usage, safety profile, etc.

Peace
 
When they say he “gave” women quaaludes what do they mean? He slipped them in their drink? No.

They were common party drugs that people took. Sort of like perc pills or weed today. It would be like in 30 years, when no one knows what a Percocet is, they talk about men giving women muscle relaxants (perc pills) and then taking advantage of them. It totally ignored the context. Women willingly take perc pills to get high, knowing the effects. In the 1979s, women willingly took quaaludes knowing the effects.

He provided recreational drugs to women when they were together, which men have done since the beginning of time.

The women took party drugs with Cosby, fucked, and then regretted it afterwards. Or they wanted a bag, and lied about being raped.

Pretty much.
 
When they say he “gave” women quaaludes what do they mean? He slipped them in their drink? No.

They were common party drugs that people took. Sort of like perc pills or weed today. It would be like in 30 years, when no one knows what a Percocet is, they talk about men giving women muscle relaxants (perc pills) and then taking advantage of them. It totally ignored the context. Women willingly take perc pills to get high, knowing the effects. In the 1979s, women willingly took quaaludes knowing the effects.

He provided recreational drugs to women when they were together, which men have done since the beginning of time.

The women took party drugs with Cosby, fucked, and then regretted it afterwards. Or they wanted a bag, and lied about being raped.

He gave it to him or he slipped it to them and they were possibly in a dazed\confused state. Once sedated, Cos went to work!

What started out as a party ended up being a party for one

giphy.gif
 
I’m not at upset at Cosby and don’t care about what he had to say about Black people. Many said they knew about Cosby and his drugging of women. Are they all mad because Cosby didn’t like their comedy or that he didn’t like them personally? Maybe.

But to blindly be nothing happened is strange.

One lie reinforced by other opportunistic liars to give credibility to a fictitious narrative.
 
He gave it to him or he slipped it to them and they were possibly in a dazed\confused state. Once sedated, Cos went to work!

What started out as a party ended up being a party for one

giphy.gif
Night that’s like saying you offered a bitch wine and she was in a “dazed and confused state” and you went to work. People take drugs and have sex, that doesn’t mean it’s tape.
 
P
Your choice. Nothing I said is contradicted by what you presented. In fact doesn't it look eerily similar. Almost as if I know a little something about drugs, their usage, safety profile, etc.

Peace


You can know as much as you like about drugs. So you know if you give someone a certain amount of a certain drug that person will be knocked out. I’m

Jeffrey Dahmer also gave his victims alcohol and drugs. Whatever drugs he gave them had them limp and unconscious. If the victims lived through those situations I’m sure you’d say they were lying too. I mean, Jeff met the dude’s at the club and they came back to drink, do drugs just to help them loosen up.

Lucky the dead bodies were around as proof of what Jeff did.
 
Night that’s like saying you offered a bitch wine and she was in a “dazed and confused state” and you went to work. People take drugs and have sex, that doesn’t mean it’s tape.

Every man in BGOL has had tipsy sex. Now imagine EVERY woman you've ever slept with saying you raped her because she was tipsy. More important is the fact that damn near EVERY alleged victim had the same story as the first. The only one who tried to mix things up was Beverly Johnson and that backfired on her.
 
Night that’s like saying you offered a bitch wine and she was in a “dazed and confused state” and you went to work. People take drugs and have sex, that doesn’t mean it’s tape.

If a woman’s “Blackout” drunk and I’m completely sober and 50 women have the same story, that wouldn’t look good for any man.

I’m just saying where there’s smoke there’s fire, and where there’s Cosby there’s rape!

200.gif
 
If a woman’s “Blackout” drunk and I’m completely sober and 50 women have the same story, that wouldn’t look good for any man.

I’m just saying where there’s smoke there’s fire, and where there’s Cosby there’s rape!

200.gif
If you believe them, telling stories 30 and 40 years later that’s on you. Why didn’t they tell on him 30 years ago? What did they not think police in the 60s and 80s would think a Black man was a rapist?
 
P



You can know as much as you like about drugs. So you know if you give someone a certain amount of a certain drug that person will be knocked out. I’m Jeffrey Dahmer also gave his victims alcohol and drugs. Whatever drugs he gave them had them limp and unconscious. If the victims lived through those situations I’m sure you’d say they were lying too. I mean, Jeff met the dude’s at the club and they came back to drink, do drugs just to help them loosen up. Lucky the dead bodies were around as proof of what Jeff did.

Check it. The argument I'm making isn't about "drugs". It's about the setup called a trial. Legally the drug on the table was "ludes". His deposition clearly states that was the drug used. He had prescriptions for those drugs. There's no record of any other drug so THAT'S the drug entered into evidence. All I'm saying is that the drug doesn't fit the narrative given by the initial accuser nor the others. This is why I said there's no way a Prosecutor would allow anyone with a medical background be a juror. While every normal individual would hear the story and think of "ludes" as a knockout pill no one in a medical environment would make that assumption. They would want to know dosing, pill size, therapeutic effect, adverse event profile, etc. BEFORE they even listened to the testimony of the alleged victims MOST, if not all, would have reached the conclusion that the drug of choice and stories have cracks.

It's all good though. This isn't about Cosby's innocence. It's about due process and how he was cheated. Peace
 
Check it. The argument I'm making isn't about "drugs". It's about the setup called a trial. Legally the drug on the table was "ludes". His deposition clearly states that was the drug used. He had prescriptions for those drugs. There's no record of any other drug so THAT'S the drug entered into evidence. All I'm saying is that the drug doesn't fit the narrative given by the initial accuser nor the others. This is why I said there's no way a Prosecutor would allow anyone with a medical background be a juror. While every normal individual would hear the story and think of "ludes" as a knockout pill no one in a medical environment would make that assumption. They would want to know dosing, pill size, therapeutic effect, adverse event profile, etc. BEFORE they even listened to the testimony of the alleged victims MOST, if not all, would have reached the conclusion that the drug of choice and stories have cracks.

It's all good though. This isn't about Cosby's innocence. It's about due process and how he was cheated. Peace

Are we to believe that’s all the drugs that Cosby gave them?

But you said it was about the trial and not the rapes. I didn’t follow the trial so I can’t speak on that, I’m speaking about his acts of rape and it being known around Hollywood.
 
If you believe them, telling stories 30 and 40 years later that’s on you. Why didn’t they tell on him 30 years ago? What did they not think police in the 60s and 80s would think a Black man was a rapist?

He was “Bill Cosby”, and maybe they didn’t want to stop the production of “Puddin Pops”?

FancyDistortedHypsilophodon-size_restricted.gif


I have no idea why they didn’t tell, maybe they didn’t think anyone would believe them? :dunno:
 
Are we to believe that’s all the drugs that Cosby gave them? But you said it was about the trial and not the rapes. I didn’t follow the trial so I can’t speak on that, I’m speaking about his acts of rape and it being known around Hollywood.

See what you wrote? What you just did was CHANGE the actual charge to fit the scenario you choose to believe. That's why I said he was cheated. There's NO evidence any other drug was used and he was actually convicted on the premise that "ludes" were used. This is where we differ besides the drugs. A million stories are just stories until proven. The grapevine is long and thick and I imagine it's longer in Hollywood. The question of course is whether that constitutes proof? Answer? It does not. You see 50 victims. I see 50 chances for someone to go to the police. I see 50 chances for a bad chemical reaction. I see 50 chances where there would be an actual witness. You see 50 people telling the same story verbatim and believing it. I see the odds of 50 individuals telling the EXACT story as being the equivalent of winning the lotto.
 
See what you wrote? What you just did was CHANGE the actual charge to fit the scenario you choose to believe. That's why I said he was cheated. There's NO evidence any other drug was used and he was actually convicted on the premise that "ludes" were used. This is where we differ besides the drugs. A million stories are just stories until proven. The grapevine is long and thick and I imagine it's longer in Hollywood. The question of course is whether that constitutes proof? Answer? It does not. You see 50 victims. I see 50 chances for someone to go to the police. I see 50 chances for a bad chemical reaction. I see 50 chances where there would be an actual witness. You see 50 people telling the same story verbatim and believing it. I see the odds of 50 individuals telling the EXACT story as being the equivalent of winning the lotto.

I didn’t change the story to fit my scenario. YOU said the drugs that he stated he gave them wouldn’t elicit the reaction that the women spoke about. I said then maybe Bill didn’t truthfully tell all the drugs that he gave them.
 
Weird...cowards didn't even make a peep until a racist white system hemmed him up..

giphy.gif

So D.L. and others snitch on Cosby before the system got to him?

Hannibal snitched before the white system got to him and everybody’s mad.

So exactly would’ve made you happy?
 
I didn’t change the story to fit my scenario. YOU said the drugs that he stated he gave them wouldn’t elicit the reaction that the women spoke about. I said then maybe Bill didn’t truthfully tell all the drugs that he gave them.

The problem of course is that these "hypothesis" isn't evidence and wouldn't have even been mentioned at trial without an objection and instruction from the bench. The ONLY drug in question is the one entered into the record as evidence. Peace
 
He was “Bill Cosby”, and maybe they didn’t want to stop the production of “Puddin Pops”?

FancyDistortedHypsilophodon-size_restricted.gif


I have no idea why they didn’t tell, maybe they didn’t think anyone would believe them? :dunno:

Yeah because the system would surely side with a Black male celebrity over a series of White women. (lol)
 
Back
Top