Dashcam footage released of Philando Castile's execution

The cop panicked once he saw Castile go into the act of reaching after being told not to. (Don't pull it) Is the cop supposed to wait for Castile to pull out the gun before shooting him? Is the cop supposed to be that trusting of a civilian that he would trust that Castile would be honest in reaching for his license instead of a gun? To the cop Castile is a stranger; he doesn't know him from a hole in the wall. Put yourself in the cop shoes what would you do?
They need to release the body cam video if it's one. The cop grab his gun soon as he said he had a gun. The guy said im not reaching for my gun and the cop unloads before he can finish the sentence good smh.
 
Disarm without lethal actions. Happens all the damn time. He didn't have to shoot him multiple times or in the location of his body he did.

Could've shot him in a number of non lethal places.

If the job was too difficult for the swine, he shouldn't have it.
He definitely shouldn't have been an officer
 
They need to release the body cam video if it's one. The cop grab his gun soon as he said he had a gun. The guy said im not reaching for my gun and the cop unloads before he can finish the sentence good smh.

Body cam footage would definitely be helpful to clear up everything. Is Castile saying "I'm not reaching for my gun" as he's simultaneously reaching for something? Until there's evidence that say differently I believe the cop was threatened by Castile act of reaching after being told not to. Also, I'm not trying to be difficult I'm just trying to analyze things in a logical Manner and not an emotional one. If there is body cam footage that is released that shows that the cop indeed fucked up I will definitely admit that I was wrong.
 
Body cam footage would definitely be helpful to clear up everything. Is Castile saying "I'm not reaching for my gun" as he's simultaneously reaching for something? Until there's evidence that say differently I believe the cop was threatened by Castile act of reaching after being told not to. Also, I'm not trying to be difficult I'm just trying to analyze things in a logical Manner and not an emotional one. If there is body cam footage that is released that shows that the cop indeed fucked up I will definitely admit that I was wrong.
The stupid trash pig asked for I'D he said I'm not reaching for my gun as he's going for his I'D. So you ask for I'D , so you get it and get shot? Fuck this pig and all pigs.
 
P.s. notice how crackas are mad only because the cop is not WASP white but Spic white so now this is wrong to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BDR
Disarm without lethal actions. Happens all the damn time. He didn't have to shoot him multiple times or in the location of his body he did.

Could've shot him in a number of non lethal places.

If the job was too difficult for the swine, he shouldn't have it.

Cops are not trained that way. Once a weapon is involved in the equation lethal force is the only option. It's kill or be killed. Should cops be trained differently? Most definitely!
 



Screen_Shot_2017-06-21_at_9.20.55_AM.png

Screen_Shot_2017-06-21_at_9.22.28_AM.png
 
The stupid trash pig asked for I'D he said I'm not reaching for my gun as he's going for his I'D. So you ask for I'D , so you get it and get shot? Fuck this pig and all pigs.

1. Cop asks for ID

2. Castile informs the officer he has a gun changing the dynamics of the stop. It's no longer a routine stop because now a gun is entered into the equation. The cop's job now is to secure and confirm that the gun is registered. That would mean that the officer would order everyone out the car so he can search for the gun.

3. Castile proceeds to reach for his ID without first checking with the officer if it's still okay because now the cop doesn't know the location of the weapon and whether or not you're reaching for that or the ID.

4. The cop shoots Castile after telling him "Don't pull it!".
 
1. Cop asks for ID

2. Castile informs the officer he has a gun changing the dynamics of the stop. It's no longer a routine stop because now a gun is entered into the equation. The cop's job now is to secure and confirm that the gun is registered. That would mean that the officer would order everyone out the car so he can search for the gun.

3. Castile proceeds to reach for his ID without first checking with the officer if it's still okay because now the cop doesn't know the location of the weapon and whether or not you're reaching for that or the ID.

4. The cop shoots Castile after telling him "Don't pull it!".
FOH he has a permit which he told him. If you're going to shoot a cop you don't say hey guess what I have a gun and I'm going to shoot you.
 
1. Cop asks for ID

2. Castile informs the officer he has a gun changing the dynamics of the stop. It's no longer a routine stop because now a gun is entered into the equation. The cop's job now is to secure and confirm that the gun is registered. That would mean that the officer would order everyone out the car so he can search for the gun.

3. Castile proceeds to reach for his ID without first checking with the officer if it's still okay because now the cop doesn't know the location of the weapon and whether or not you're reaching for that or the ID.

4. The cop shoots Castile after telling him "Don't pull it!".
Officer reach for his gun soon as he tells him.

The officer had already racially profile him. Said he fit the description of a robbery suspect. Because he had dreads and was black smh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BDR
FOH he has a permit which he told him. If you're going to shoot a cop you don't say hey guess what I have a gun and I'm going to shoot you.

Castile went into the act of reaching after being told not to; "Don't pull it". It doesn't matter what Castile's intent was.
 
I just read on Reddit that one of the black jurors was an 18 year old girl from Africa had been here for eight years that the prosecution tried to remove from lack of legal awareness. Don't know if it's true or not.
 
somebody on Lipstickalley said this

The black people on the jury were 18 and 20. The whites were all over the age of 30. They knew what they were doing and that includes the prosecutor because they are part of the problem too.

Many black people in big cities only interact with white people as subordinates. At that age, it is possible they only interacted with whites as teachers, supervisors, landlords etc. So when some older white person says something they take it as authority.

what do you guys think?
 
Two Black Jurors look like suburbanites. Imho, Having two Young Black suburbanites in the juror is no different than having a racist baby boomer in the juror. Mainly because both are usually detached from reality when it pertains to race. That's why we have to prepare our youth, because once they're surrounded by a bunch of rednecks in the deliberation room, they're fucked.

A lot of us know where the "paranoia" comes from, when we come in contact with racist NonWhites, but a lot of Black folks don't understand. Because in their minds they're surrounded by love when their at the Starbucks with the anonymous smiling pale faces.

None of us are exempt from this type of bs.....keep that in mind
 
1. Cop asks for ID

2. Castile informs the officer he has a gun changing the dynamics of the stop. It's no longer a routine stop because now a gun is entered into the equation. The cop's job now is to secure and confirm that the gun is registered. That would mean that the officer would order everyone out the car so he can search for the gun.

3. Castile proceeds to reach for his ID without first checking with the officer if it's still okay because now the cop doesn't know the location of the weapon and whether or not you're reaching for that or the ID.

4. The cop shoots Castile after telling him "Don't pull it!".
He asked for the ID and that was why he went into his wallet. That cop should be a dishwasher or clean restrooms. I have seen other videos of armed people and all situations are different depending on the cop.
I am wondering about all those stops on him as though they were after him for a reason. We may never know on that.
But the brainwashing I witnessed after he saw that dude did not have a gun and the way he was steady shooting him. If he had shot the kid or one of the rounds ricocheted and hit the kid it seems they would have had so called explanations for that.
 
I just read on Reddit that one of the black jurors was an 18 year old girl from Africa had been here for eight years that the prosecution tried to remove from lack of legal awareness. Don't know if it's true or not.
I did time in prison with a brother from Africa. This brother was so black that he was damn near blue. I think he was an exchange student also. But sometimes these people have seen or been thru things that has disturbed them. This brother hated white people with a passion and killed some while in America. I hated to see him lose control
40 or 50 years ago blacks in South Africa had a hate for whites in America saying that we have joined with the ones who enslaved us as though we loved slavery. Said they did not want to hear anything a black leader in America had to say. Sadly their plans of running the whites out of their country was stopped by letting Mandela out of prison to rock them to sleep. Some rose up and took lives of white South Africa anyway. They got shovels, picks and what ever they could fight with and went from ranch house to ranch house killing off whole families of whites until Mandela sent the military in to take them down.
 
young adults (18-24) are more than capable of making the same decisions as those over 30, but usually, given their life experiences they often don't
Screen_Shot_2017-06-21_at_9.20.55_AM.png

Screen_Shot_2017-06-21_at_9.22.28_AM.png



If,these are the jurors that buckled under the pressure of white folks,I will consider them traitors.

I don't give a fuck,how young they are,because they should have some knowledge about the killings that's been going on,since Obama was in office.

I'm tired of people using someone's youth as an excuse for shit...I was eleven years old when the Rodney King beating happened; I knew how fucked up it was at the time.

We're in the information age yet you're telling me you haven't seen one story about a race soldiers executing our people.......gtfoh


No way in hell,a black person can see that video and come out with a not guilty verdict unless they care more about themselves than sending this piece of shit to prison.

White folks can send us to jail for the smallest shit with hardly no evidence yet some of us don't want to send white folks or our so called ally to jail for executing us on a fucking video.



Disarm without lethal actions. Happens all the damn time. He didn't have to shoot him multiple times or in the location of his body he did.

Could've shot him in a number of non lethal places.

If the job was too difficult for the swine, he shouldn't have it.



White folks can shoot and point at cops and get taking alive yet we can't even fucking give them our ID without getting shot at.

I remember a few years ago,in South Carolina a black guy got pulled over at a gas station and the cop told him get his license.When the guy was getting his license,the cop start shooting at him.Let me get this straight you asked the guy for his licence yet you start shooting him.... :smh::smh::smh:


Luckily,the guy survived and sue the shit out of the police department.

Edit:




How the fuck you have a gun,taser,baton and backup(sometimes),but you're still scare for your life.


And,who is that in your sig

:sleazy:
 
The cop panicked once he saw Castile go into the act of reaching after being told not to. (Don't pull it) Is the cop supposed to wait for Castile to pull out the gun before shooting him? Is the cop supposed to be that trusting of a civilian that he would trust that Castile would be honest in reaching for his license instead of a gun? To the cop Castile is a stranger; he doesn't know him from a hole in the wall. Put yourself in the cop shoes what would you do?
you are a liar! CASTILE DID NOT "REACH" HE WAS TOLD TO GET HIS I.D AND THEN HE TOLD THE COP HE HAD A LICENSED FIREARM
..AND KNOWS THAT, AS HES ABOUT TO REACH FOR HIS I.D ,THE COP MIGHT BE AWARE OF THE FIREARM IN THAT RESPECT AND PANIC AND THINK HE IS "REACHING" NOT THE OTHER WAY ROUND, ,.............AND THAT IS WHY MR....
CASTILE TOLD THE COP "BEFORE HE REACHED FOR HIS I.D." AS HE WAS INSTRUCTED TO! ..B
.....BECOS HE IS A BLACKMAN, HE IS AWARE, THAT THE SIMPLE ACT OF REACHIN FOR HIS ID CAN BE MISCONSTRUED AS REACHING FOR A FIREARM , HENCE HE TELLS THE COP "BEFOREHAND "HE IS CARRYIN!!

AND LASTLY...RIDDLE ME THIS ..... WHO TELLS A COP " I HAVE A FIREARM" IF HE IS TRYIN TO BLAST THE COP?,I

TRULY WONDER WHY ITS SO EASY FOR U TO SEE & UNDERSTAND THE COPS PERSPECTIVE AND EVEN DRAW UP IMAGINED SCENARIOS BUT SOMEHOW BE UNABLE TO SEE CASTILE'S PERSPECTIVE??...HMMMM VERY TELLING
 
Last edited:
Which part of the video shows Castile reaching for his gun? All that is in the video is the voice of a compliant individual who was pulled over with his family for being black. In the midst of speaking in a respectful manner, the officer panicks and unloads seven rounds into that respectful black man. Although the officer claims Castile reached for his gun, the wife who witnessed the ordeal refutes that claim. Moreover, the video seems to clearly demonstrate that the officer never actually saw the weapon or where it was located--which begs the question: how could the officer claim Castile was going for a weapon when he didn't even know where the weapon was? In summary, your analysis of this situation is far too deferential to police, and as long as people continue to think like you, cops will continue killing black people with impunity.
Yes that was no gun on him. It may have been in the dashboard. If it had been on him or on the seat we would have saw them taking it out or away. It is just an example of the only thing that count is what they say. And legality only becomes a concern when certain people use their position for their purpose. An example would be 911, Libya, etc.
 
damn :smh:
...and then after shooting a man for nothing, he stays pointing his gun at the dying man and his woman/kid while he dies..... for NOTHING.

Just re-listened to that last part, where he's explaining what happened... this mufucka asked for his license, etc, the guy tells him that he is carrying and as he's reaching for the license that the cop just asked him to produce, the cop fires says don't reach for it... but never sees what he's reaching for and doesn't think that possibly he is reaching for his license... which he just told him to get. He fired multiple shots because the guy that was instructed to show his license was reaching for it, but the cop thinks his grip looks too wide for a fuckin wallet? WTF?
Are we watching the same video? If you watched closely, you would have seen that he produced his documents at the 1:31 mark then proceeded to alert the officer that he had a firearm.
 
Back
Top