Democratic Establishment Wins......Perez to lead DNC

ballscout1

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Well the establishment retains control which means the democratic losing streak will continue.


ATLANTA ― Former Labor Secretary Tom Perez"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">Tom Perez was elected chair of the Democratic National Committee"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">Democratic National Committee on Saturday after a contentious race that highlighted divisions within the party.

Perez bested Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the only other candidate remaining in the race after an inconclusive first round of voting. The final tally was 235 for Perez and 200 for Ellison.

Perez will now begin the work of rebuilding a Democratic Party battered by historic electoral losses as it is undertakes the task of confronting President Donald Trump"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">Donald Trump and his agenda.

He also will have to win the trust of those who supported Ellison, his chief opponent. Many progressive activists who backed Sen. Bernie Sanders"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in the 2016 presidential primary viewed Ellison’s candidacy as a way to secure a foothold in the party after Sanders’ defeat.

Perez immediately moved to appoint Ellison deputy DNC chair and accepted a hug from his rival on the conference room stage. “I’m asking you to give everything you’ve got to support Chairman Perez,” Ellison told his supporters.

Perez bashed Trump and the “know-nothing movement,” and vowed to lead Democrats to victory against the president in 2020.

“We are one family, and I know we will leave here united today, no doubt about that,” Perez said. “We are indeed the party that turns hardship into hope. We are the party that turns doubts into dreams.”

Perez’s supporters cited his management experience, rather than his policy views or association with Obama.

“When I look at the job of the chairman, it’s a very complicated position … Ultimately, I think Tom’s experience managing large organizations was one of the factors that really led me there,” Missouri DNC member Brian Wahby said after endorsing Perez on Friday. “Any of these people would be fantastic, and it was a tough, tough decision.”

Idaho Democratic Party executive director Sally Boynton Brown, U.S. Air Force veteran Sam Ronan, media strategist Jehmu Greene and attorney Peter Peckarsky withdrew after the first round of voting on Saturday. Ronan and Peckarsky endorsed Ellison, while Greene threw her support to Perez. South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg dropped out just before voting began, without endorsing anyone.

The party chair’s main role is to raise funds, recruit candidates and represent the party to the media. The job typically is neither coveted nor influential when a party controls the White House and the president’s choice takes precedence.

But when a party is out of power, as Democrats are now, the race for chairmanship reflects competition among rival factions over how best to re-orient the party for future elections. In addition to losing control of the White House in 2016 and failing to retake either house of Congress, Democrats have lost almost 1,000 state legislature seats"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">1,000 state legislature seats since 2009.

To complicate matters, the Democratic Party is divided along ideological lines. Some progressives who backed Sanders in the presidential primary remain convinced that the DNC favored Hillary Clinton"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">Hillary Clinton, and that the party failed to channel Sanders’ populist economic message in the campaign against Trump"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">Trump.

Shortly after Trump’s victory, Sanders and prominent Clinton supporters like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) coalesced behind Ellison’s candidacy in an apparent effort to unite the party.

Perez entered the race in mid-December, reportedly after aides"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">aides to then-President Barack Obama"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">Barack Obama encouraged him. He has proven a formidable adversary for Ellison, picking up support from key Obama administration figures like former Vice President Joe Biden"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">Joe Biden and former Attorney General Eric Holder.

Perez pitched his federal executive experience, but he drew criticism"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">criticism for his public support of the now-defunct Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement while serving in Obama’s Cabinet. Like Ellison, Perez has a stellar reputation"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">stellar reputation in progressive circles, leading some liberals to downplay the significance of a Perez victory.

Ellison, a congressman since 2007, pointed to his electoral success and his previous career as an organizer. He was hobbled early in the race by concerns about his past ties"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">past ties to the Nation of Islam, and leaked audio of controversial remarks"}}" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(46, 112, 97);">controversial remarks he made about Israel at a 2010 fundraiser.

Over the course of a race that spanned over three months, all of the DNC candidates agreed the party desperately needs new, innovative leadership.

And across ideological lines, state party chairs and operatives have criticized the Obama administration’s formation of Organizing for Action, a fundraising and organizing arm that many Democrats say undermined party infrastructure. They also lament previous chairs’ lack of transparency and failure to attend to the needs of state and local parties.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tom-perez-dnc-chair_us_58b0952ae4b060480e07d132?
 
Time to become an Independent, same ol shit! :smh:


At least wait until Watcher and Big Tex come in and tries to put a shine on the turd...

:smh::smh::smh::smh::smh:

These morokrs ain't won shit but the White House because of Obama in 20 years and they run right back to the establishment way of doing things.

In his speech he talking about Trump instead of talking about fixing his broke ass corporate interest party
 
When Obama was elected the GOP moved to the right. 2 years later
the GOP controlled the majority of states and both houses of Congress.

Trump wins, the Democrats move to the right. This is the same formula
that caused them so many losses when they were under Dick Gephardt
in the House.

The Democrats only found their footing when Howard Dean took over
the party. It was he who led them to get Congress in 2006, and to the
election of Obama.. Of course one of the first acts of Obama was to
get rid of Dean, and since then, the Democrats have lost everything...
 
At least wait until Watcher and Big Tex come in and tries to put a shine on the turd...

:smh::smh::smh::smh::smh:

These morokrs ain't won shit but the White House because of Obama in 20 years and they run right back to the establishment way of doing things.

In his speech he talking about Trump instead of talking about fixing his broke ass corporate interest party

This shit is becoming pathetic bruh. You right Dems been losing seats the last decade or so and they keep doing the same thing. Same ol leadership, black folks need to rise up against these fools and start voting independent or another party.
 
Have not paid much attention to the DNC chair stuff honestly. Other than Perez being the favorite of some of the establishment (I think Schumer wanted Ellison) was there a huge difference in how they said they'd lead, organize, work towards 2018 elections and beyond?

Other than Debbie Wasserman being crappy at it, I don't see the person at the helm making a huge difference unless they have some revolutionary ideas.
 
Jews win and Trump just won two terms.

Democrats will never get people out to vote for EXCITEMENT en masse doing the same shit.

Some will vote out of spite of Trump, but the ONLY way for them to beat Trump is an excited young base.
Perez won't do shit.
 
:eek: "Russia, Russia, Russia!!!" It's a shame that one side got exposed and shit hasn't changed. Establishment wins. :crymeariver: "Russian hacked us!!"

:hmm: They been hacking. It's just these dumb asses got exposed and keep doing the same dumb shit.

It's just a trainwreck...
 
Ellison is still going to be second in command as Deputy Chair, plus he gets to keep the Congressional seat which he had pledged to give up if he had won. Perez and Ellison never attacked each other personally, and they both want whatever is in the best interest of the overall Party. Sounds like a best case scenario to me. :dunno:
 
Man why does the liberal left think that most of the party thinks like them.....Most of the Democratic party is not on that liberal bullshit.....

Bernie got beat in the primary.....period...the party doesn t want that liberal bullshit
 
Was Ellison planning on doing things extremely different than Perez will? With Ellison as his deputy, they'll at least make some of his supporters happy, but in the end, I don't see a committee chairman inspiring any kind of passion/excitement. They need candidates out there on the stump to do that.... that's where they need the new blood. Now if Perez mentions getting Hillary to run again, or starts pushing Chelsea to run... then I see the establishment thing hurting.... but other than that, if he can run the committee better than the last Chair, and maybe solidify their network and get people to change their passwords occasionally, lol, I don't see it being a bad thing, or a good thing for that matter.



Jews win and Trump just won two terms.

Democrats will never get people out to vote for EXCITEMENT en masse doing the same shit.

Some will vote out of spite of Trump, but the ONLY way for them to beat Trump is an excited young base.
Perez won't do shit.
 
At least wait until Watcher and Big Tex come in and tries to put a shine on the turd...

:smh::smh::smh::smh::smh:

These morokrs ain't won shit but the White House because of Obama in 20 years and they run right back to the establishment way of doing things.

In his speech he talking about Trump instead of talking about fixing his broke ass corporate interest party

I don't give a fuck who won. Anybody that's willing to go to work and turn this shit around, I'm good. You can spend the next 4 years fighting with others on the left. That's you.

I'm fighting against Trump all day, every day.
 
The decimation of the Democratic Party, visualized
imrs.php


Democrats during Obama’s presidency lost 11 governorships, 13 U.S. Senate seats, 69 House seats, and 913 state legislative seats and 30 state legislative chambers.

Keep fucking with these establishment picks and see how it goes :smh:

Time for a new approach, not more of the same
 
Jews win and Trump just won two terms.

Democrats will never get people out to vote for EXCITEMENT en masse doing the same shit.

Some will vote out of spite of Trump, but the ONLY way for them to beat Trump is an excited young base.
Perez won't do shit.

Most of the people in this country don't even know who their Senators are, much less who the head of a political committee is. I dare you to call 10 random people under the age of 30 and ask them if they know who the head of the DNC is.

It's going to be up to whatever candidate emerges.
 
I knew he wasn't going to win

Democrats keep going status quo because it keeps the ones with power. They don't care if it hurts the party and doesn't reflect of the people.

The democratic party is Alan Colmes(RIP) versus Sean Hannity. And they'll probably still fuck up and lose the mid term even with Trump.
 
Fyi for those that care. Behind closed doors, both parties want to be directed by a few wealthy people now

DNC Members Vote Down Corporate Money Ban

The measure would have reinstated a policy put in place by Barack Obama.
By Daniel Marans
Joshua Roberts / Reuters
Supporters of Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), a candidate for Democratic National Committee Chairman, cheer during a forum in Baltimore, on Feb. 11, 2017.

ATLANTA ― Democratic National Committee members on Saturday voted down a resolution that would have reinstated former President Barack Obama’s ban on corporate political action committee donations to the party.

Resolution 33, introduced by DNC Vice Chair Christine Pelosi, would also have forbidden “registered, federal corporate lobbyists” from serving as “DNC chair-appointed, at-large members.”

A majority of the 442 eligible DNC members rejected the resolution after roughly a dozen members rose to speak for and against it. Supporters of DNC chair candidate Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) could be heard cheering loudly during arguments in favor of the resolution from their seats in the section of the auditorium open to the public.

The resolution will now go to the DNC’s smaller executive committee for consideration.

Obama, as the party’s presidential nominee in 2008, banned contributions from political action committees, as well as from lobbyists. Former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz quietly lifted the ban ahead of the 2016 election.

Bob Mulholland, DNC member from Chico, California, was one of the bill’s most vocal opponents and helped lead a successful effort to table the resolution for further review on Friday. He argued that the ban would handicap Democrats at a time when they need all the resources they can muster.

“Just a reminder that Republicans control all three branches of the government right now ― all three branches. We do not have a president in the White House,” Mulholland said. “I am not a member of Mother Theresa’s sisters organization; I am a member of the Democratic Party.”

New York DNC Member Stuart Appelbaum, a co-sponsor of the resolution, insisted that it was crucial for voters to believe the DNC is accountable to them, not corporate interests.

“This resolution provides us an important opportunity to send a message to the people of this country as to our values,” said Appelbaum, president of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union.

“It is not something new: We operated this way for seven years!” Appelbaum added, referring to the Obama-era ban.

Resolution 33 appears to be narrower than the ban on contributions from lobbyists and PACs imposed by Obama, explicitly banning donations only from corporate PACs.

Ellison told HuffPost in January that he would reinstate Obama’s ban on lobbyist donations. He subsequently walked back the promise, vowing only to make sure the measure was seconded and debated by the DNC’s executive committee.

His chief opponent, former Labor Secretary Tom Perez, declined to say whether he supports the idea of such a ban.

DNC members are considering Resolution 33 banning corp $ now pic.twitter.com/LbR4Nz48md
— Daniel Marans (@danielmarans) February 25, 2017
 
When Obama was elected the GOP moved to the right. 2 years later
the GOP controlled the majority of states and both houses of Congress.

Trump wins, the Democrats move to the right. This is the same formula
that caused them so many losses when they were under Dick Gephardt
in the House.

The Democrats only found their footing when Howard Dean took over
the party. It was he who led them to get Congress in 2006, and to the
election of Obama.. Of course one of the first acts of Obama was to
get rid of Dean, and since then, the Democrats have lost everything...

And the democrats just won the 2020 election for trump. Or whoever is in his place. Thanks alot democrats!
 
I don't give a fuck who won. Anybody that's willing to go to work and turn this shit around, I'm good. You can spend the next 4 years fighting with others on the left. That's you.

I'm fighting against Trump all day, every day.

We saw how that anybody worked out with the last establishment shill that held the office....
 
Fyi for those that care. Behind closed doors, both parties want to be directed by a few wealthy people now

DNC Members Vote Down Corporate Money Ban

The measure would have reinstated a policy put in place by Barack Obama.
By Daniel Marans
Joshua Roberts / Reuters
Supporters of Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), a candidate for Democratic National Committee Chairman, cheer during a forum in Baltimore, on Feb. 11, 2017.

ATLANTA ― Democratic National Committee members on Saturday voted down a resolution that would have reinstated former President Barack Obama’s ban on corporate political action committee donations to the party.

Resolution 33, introduced by DNC Vice Chair Christine Pelosi, would also have forbidden “registered, federal corporate lobbyists” from serving as “DNC chair-appointed, at-large members.”

A majority of the 442 eligible DNC members rejected the resolution after roughly a dozen members rose to speak for and against it. Supporters of DNC chair candidate Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) could be heard cheering loudly during arguments in favor of the resolution from their seats in the section of the auditorium open to the public.

The resolution will now go to the DNC’s smaller executive committee for consideration.

Obama, as the party’s presidential nominee in 2008, banned contributions from political action committees, as well as from lobbyists. Former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz quietly lifted the ban ahead of the 2016 election.

Bob Mulholland, DNC member from Chico, California, was one of the bill’s most vocal opponents and helped lead a successful effort to table the resolution for further review on Friday. He argued that the ban would handicap Democrats at a time when they need all the resources they can muster.

“Just a reminder that Republicans control all three branches of the government right now ― all three branches. We do not have a president in the White House,” Mulholland said. “I am not a member of Mother Theresa’s sisters organization; I am a member of the Democratic Party.”

New York DNC Member Stuart Appelbaum, a co-sponsor of the resolution, insisted that it was crucial for voters to believe the DNC is accountable to them, not corporate interests.

“This resolution provides us an important opportunity to send a message to the people of this country as to our values,” said Appelbaum, president of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union.

“It is not something new: We operated this way for seven years!” Appelbaum added, referring to the Obama-era ban.

Resolution 33 appears to be narrower than the ban on contributions from lobbyists and PACs imposed by Obama, explicitly banning donations only from corporate PACs.

Ellison told HuffPost in January that he would reinstate Obama’s ban on lobbyist donations. He subsequently walked back the promise, vowing only to make sure the measure was seconded and debated by the DNC’s executive committee.

His chief opponent, former Labor Secretary Tom Perez, declined to say whether he supports the idea of such a ban.

DNC members are considering Resolution 33 banning corp $ now pic.twitter.com/LbR4Nz48md
— Daniel Marans (@danielmarans) February 25, 2017

The establishment ain't giving up that Corp and lobby money...

Not when they can keep bullshit ting their base....
 
Man why does the liberal left think that most of the party thinks like them.....Most of the Democratic party is not on that liberal bullshit.....

Bernie got beat in the primary.....period...the party doesn t want that liberal bullshit

What he said.
The Democratic Party has been high jacked by the extreme left.
People 35 and older aren't with that Hollywood mentality.
The party is easy too liberal for my taste.
I'm changing my status to independent.
 
Was Ellison planning on doing things extremely different than Perez will? With Ellison as his deputy, they'll at least make some of his supporters happy, but in the end, I don't see a committee chairman inspiring any kind of passion/excitement. They need candidates out there on the stump to do that.... that's where they need the new blood. Now if Perez mentions getting Hillary to run again, or starts pushing Chelsea to run... then I see the establishment thing hurting.... but other than that, if he can run the committee better than the last Chair, and maybe solidify their network and get people to change their passwords occasionally, lol, I don't see it being a bad thing, or a good thing for that matter.
One of the problems with the Democratic party except they don't have anybody who inspires voters. Nothing about the Democratic party, other than the fact that they are opposite from the ridiculous ways and thoughts of the Republican Party, Inspire anyone to go out and vote for them.

Hillary? Seriously, Hillary freaking Clinton? Even Bernie Sanders was an old curmudgeon period had he been 30 years younger then he would have possibly inspired voters more than he did. But teetering on the age of 80, nah, not enough.

So who's next? Who is the Democratic next hope to knock off Trump?
 
What he said.
The Democratic Party has been high jacked by the extreme left.
People 35 and older aren't with that Hollywood mentality.
The party is easy too liberal for my taste.
I'm changing my status to independent.
So which candidate did *YOU* support for DNC Chairman? It sounds as if your "Bitch Moan Lather Rinse Repeat" farewell speech was written LONG before today's election. :dunno:
 
What he said.
The Democratic Party has been high jacked by the extreme left.
People 35 and older aren't with that Hollywood mentality.
The party is easy too liberal for my taste.
I'm changing my status to independent.

Not changing to independent.....but the moderate democrat needs a stronger voice
 
What he said.
The Democratic Party has been high jacked by the extreme left.
People 35 and older aren't with that Hollywood mentality.
The party is easy too liberal for my taste.
I'm changing my status to independent.

WTH are you talking about? The Democratic party has been moving to the right since Regan. Maybe you haven't noticed but the republicans keep moving right and dragging the weak dems along with them. Sure The DEMs have some liberal social values and the other side has some conservative ones but when it comes to keeping the rich and and the vast majority of us poor they are both serving the same master. Today's vote was a middle finger to the working people.
 
At least wait until Watcher and Big Tex come in and tries to put a shine on the turd...

:smh::smh::smh::smh::smh:

These morokrs ain't won shit but the White House because of Obama in 20 years and they run right back to the establishment way of doing things.

In his speech he talking about Trump instead of talking about fixing his broke ass corporate interest party
Your still talking about Democrats like they matter. Let me say it again...

The republicans aren't giving up power. They control 100% of government and will change every rule to assure it stays that way. Democrats could have 10 to 1 voters over the republicans and they will still lose.

The war against the media and Latino crackdown is the first stage. Bannon is a lunatic and we haven't seen nothing yet.

President Trump’s right-hand man Steve Bannon called for Christian holy war: Now he’s on the National Security Council
"We're at the very beginning stages of a very brutal and bloody conflict," President Trump's chief strategist told
http://www.salon.com/2017/01/30/pre...-is-on-the-national-security-council_partner/

Everyone would be better off trying to elect moderate republicans until it's time for the war.

1547029_300x300
 
Just a taste of what republicans will do

Pennsylvania Democrats Could Lose A Safe Seat Just As Liberal Activists Focus On Local Politics
A judge kicked the Democratic candidate for a Philadelphia district off the ballot.
By Paul Blumenthal

WASHINGTON ― Pennsylvania Democrats would like to dig themselves out of a huge deficit in the state’s House of Representatives, where Republicans hold 121 out of 203 seats. That could be slightly more difficult now that their candidate for a special election in a heavily Democratic district has just been kicked off the ballot for allegedly not living in the district.

A Commonwealth Court judge ruled Thursday that Frederick Ramirez, the Democratic candidate for the 197th House District seat, must be removed from the ballot for the March 21 election. The decision, if upheld on appeal, would leave Democrats with no listed candidate. The 197th District encompasses heavily Latino neighborhoods in Philadelphia where 85 percent of voters are Democrats and just 5 percent are Republicans.

The only other candidate on the ballot is Republican Lucinda Little.

Judge Anne Covey held that Ramirez did not meet the requirements for maintaining a domicile in the district. The court was presented with evidence of low water and energy usage for the apartment in which the candidate claimed to be living. Ramirez acknowledged that he spent multiple days of the week with his daughter at a suburban house and with his girlfriend at her home outside the district.

“I believe the court got it wrong,” Ramirez’s lawyer, Adam Bonin, told The Huffington Post.

“I can’t believe this,” said Ramirez, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. “This is a political decision. This is not a legal decision.”

The case was initiated by the local Republican Party and joined by two Democrats, as necessary under state law.

Covey’s decision creates a real possibility that Democrats could lose a seat they should otherwise win easily. It comes amid a string of bad news for Pennsylvania Democrats. Not only did they lose ground in the state legislature in 2016 and fail to defeat U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), but a number of their elected officials have recently faced corruption convictions or allegations.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...us_58b091a8e4b0a8a9b7821fa0?2t6ht8ji2vum78pvi
 
Just a taste of what republicans will do

Pennsylvania Democrats Could Lose A Safe Seat Just As Liberal Activists Focus On Local Politics
A judge kicked the Democratic candidate for a Philadelphia district off the ballot.
By Paul Blumenthal

WASHINGTON ― Pennsylvania Democrats would like to dig themselves out of a huge deficit in the state’s House of Representatives, where Republicans hold 121 out of 203 seats. That could be slightly more difficult now that their candidate for a special election in a heavily Democratic district has just been kicked off the ballot for allegedly not living in the district.

A Commonwealth Court judge ruled Thursday that Frederick Ramirez, the Democratic candidate for the 197th House District seat, must be removed from the ballot for the March 21 election. The decision, if upheld on appeal, would leave Democrats with no listed candidate. The 197th District encompasses heavily Latino neighborhoods in Philadelphia where 85 percent of voters are Democrats and just 5 percent are Republicans.

The only other candidate on the ballot is Republican Lucinda Little.

Judge Anne Covey held that Ramirez did not meet the requirements for maintaining a domicile in the district. The court was presented with evidence of low water and energy usage for the apartment in which the candidate claimed to be living. Ramirez acknowledged that he spent multiple days of the week with his daughter at a suburban house and with his girlfriend at her home outside the district.

“I believe the court got it wrong,” Ramirez’s lawyer, Adam Bonin, told The Huffington Post.

“I can’t believe this,” said Ramirez, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. “This is a political decision. This is not a legal decision.”

The case was initiated by the local Republican Party and joined by two Democrats, as necessary under state law.

Covey’s decision creates a real possibility that Democrats could lose a seat they should otherwise win easily. It comes amid a string of bad news for Pennsylvania Democrats. Not only did they lose ground in the state legislature in 2016 and fail to defeat U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), but a number of their elected officials have recently faced corruption convictions or allegations.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...us_58b091a8e4b0a8a9b7821fa0?2t6ht8ji2vum78pvi

This is just a question.. Do you ever speak your mind or do you just quote the news??
 
This is just a question.. Do you ever speak your mind or do you just quote the news??
You fucking trump supporters just hate facts huh. Your getting all worked up over fake news!

What was my post above the one you selectively quoted?

Do you mentally ill trump supporters have other thoughts from what Bannon/Trump tweets to you? Hillary 2020.....straight from trump not based in reality as always.
 
Back
Top