Bernie supporters lose their shit & riot in Nevada; NV Dem's file complaint w/DNC

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
I have a couple of links, one of them is a very long read so I will do that in a reply post. Basically, some of Bernies delegates were excluded because they didn't file properly.


http://www.theamericanmirror.com/chaos-police-threaten-arrests-nevada-dem-convention/

Supporters of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders clashed in Las Vegas on Saturday and it got so out of hand, cops descended on the ballroom and threatened arrests.

Convention attendee and YouTube user Anie H. posted several photos of the action, as announcements were made over the loud speaker to leave the Paris Hotel or risk being arrested.




Nevada Democrats defend exclusion of Bernie convention delegates that led to explosion of anger

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/05/nev...ion-delegates-that-led-to-explosion-of-anger/


Nevada’s Democratic State Committee defended excluding 58 Bernie Sanders’ delegates at their convention Saturday night, saying they failed to register properly as Democrats before the final caucus.

At the contentious convention, held in the Paris hotel in Las Vegas, scuffles broke out as Sanders’ supporters claimed that the state party subverted the will of the voters by awarding more pledged delegates to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

(RELATED: Nevada Democrats shift the blame: Casino security made us shut down chaotic convention)

According to the Las Vegas Sun, Clinton took 20 of the 35 pledged delegates Nevada will send to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia this summer.

Sanders supporters — who were slightly outnumbered by fans of Clinton — shouted down speakers, with California Sen. Barbara Boxer called a “b*tch” as she tried to speak. Supporters of the Vermont senator complained bitterly as Democratic leaders quickly attempted to gavel the proceedings to a close.


In a tweet posted by Nevada journalist Jon Ralston, the Nevada State Democratic Party defended excluding 58 Sanders delegates.

According to the party:

There were 64 Sanders Delegates and Alternates whose validity was challenged because of the following issues:


  • They were not registered Democratic voters in Nevada By May 1, 2016.

  • Their information — such as address, date of n=birth and name — could not be found and they did not respond to requests from the party and campaigns to correct it.
They continued, “Of these 64 Delegates and Alternates, six were allowed to be seated after their appropriate information was provided and 58 were denied because of the reasons outlined above.”

The party also called any “insinuation of unfairness … totally inaccurate,” saying they were abiding by rules unanimously set forth by the Credentials Committee.

Watch video from the convention below:

(There are videos at the sourcelink I couldn't get to embed but I went to the twitter user's time line and got a few)











 
NV Democrats file complaint against Sanders campaign to DNC

The state Democratic Party has filed a stinging complaint with national Democrats over the "explosive situation" and "paranoid fantasy of fraud and delegate theft" created by Bernie Sanders supporters at Saturday's state convention, warning it could be a harbinger of what's to come in Philadelphia in July.

The key section from party lawyer Bradley Schrager to the DNC's Rules Committee: "We believe, unfortunately, that the tactics and behavior on display here in Nevada are harbingers of things to come as Democrats gather in Philadelphia in July for our National Convention. We write to alert you to what we perceive as the Sander Campaign’s penchant for extra-parliamentary behavior—indeed, actual violence—in place of democratic conduct in a convention setting, and furthermore what we can only describe as their encouragement of, and complicity in, a very dangerous atmosphere that ended in chaos and physical threats to fellow Democrats."

And Schrager is clear he the party does not believe this is band of rogue delegates: "The Sanders Campaign spent its time either ignoring or profiting from the chaos it did much to create and nothing to diminish or mitigate. It was clear to the NSDP that part of the approach by the Sanders Campaign was to employ these easily-incensed delegates as shock troops to sway the convention proceedings. At the very least, these delegates became a way for the Sanders Campaign to seek the advantage of disruption at any particular moment while trying to disavow any responsibility for their actions even as it was ongoing. At no time did any Sanders representative make anything more than token gestures towards peace in the hall, and at the times of most intense crisis offered little more than shrugs and smirks."

Sanders himself has yet to decry the death threats to state Chair Roberta Lange or the raucous antics of his followers.

Here's the letter:

 
Colin warning, long read:

The sour grapes revolution that rocked the Paris Hotel

https://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/sour-grapes-revolution-rocked-paris-hotel


On the eve of the Nevada Democratic Convention in Las Vegas, Friday the 13th as the calendar would have it, Bernie Sanders issued a news release asking for good fortune on that traditionally unlucky day.

The Vermont senator, prodded by Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, who feared unrest at the state confab after a hard-fought caucus battle, talked of “transformational change in America through honest and dignified discussion of the issues” and emphasized “working together respectfully and constructively” to defeat Donald Trump in November.

It was a game effort, but doomed to fail.

What ensued at the Paris Hotel the following day was anything but honest and dignified and everything but respectful and constructive as dozens of Sanders delegates exploded in anger at what they called an anti-democratic attempt to steal the convention from them.

By the time hotel security shut down the event late Saturday evening, the Sanders delegates had hurled ugly epithets at Clinton surrogate Barbara Boxer, and used a sign to block her from being shown on big screens; screamed vulgarities at state Chairwoman Roberta Lange, who later received death threats after Sanders sympathizers posted her cell phone number and home address online; and threw chairs at the stage as they rushed forward to try to take control of a convention they had lost, just as Sanders was defeated at the Feb. 20 by Clinton in in a decisive result.

The next day, a group of Sanders supporters protested at the state Democratic Party headquarters and scrawled messages ('Murdered democracy" and "You are scum" among them) on the outside walls and nearby sidewalks.

Sanders, who had national campaign operatives on the floor at the Paris, has yet to comment on the near-riot his local operatives enabled as they poured gas on a fire that started with a lawsuit against the party and ignited after arguments about rules, voice votes and rejected delegates.

Despite their social media frothing and self-righteous screeds, the facts reveal that the Sanders folks disregarded rules, then when shown the truth, attacked organizers and party officials as tools of a conspiracy to defraud the senator of what was never rightfully his in the first place. Instead of acknowledging they were out-organized by a Clinton campaign chastened by county convention results and reanimated to cement the caucus numbers at the Paris, the Sanders folks have decided to cry conflagration in a crowded building, without regard to what they burn down in the process.

If what happens in Vegas happens in Philadelphia, the chances of a unified Democratic Party in the general election are virtually nonexistent and the odds of a President Trump suddenly don’t look so long.

----

Democracy is messy, caucuses are messier and conventions are the messiest of all. But even by those metrics, the Saturday gathering on the Las Vegas Strip was as noisy and pointless as a second-rate vaudeville act.

It also was inevitable.

The passion coursing through the Sanders movement, well documented in Nevada and elsewhere, has only grown more intense – and at time irrationally directed – as the inevitability of a Clinton nomination has become clear. The senator’s inability – or refusal – to tamp down the grassroots uprising he has engendered, even when it veers off a productive course, surely stems from his genuine surprise at his viability and his frustration with the Clinton machine.

All of that came to a head in Las Vegas on Saturday, presaged by a failed lawsuit with Team Sanders alleging state Democrats had conspired to prevent their people from being in key party positions. This is the kind of arcana that usually dominates intraparty fights and convention tussles – arguments over rules and bylaws.

But Reid and his team, which runs the Democratic Party, knew that the Sanders folks, who had taken over county conventions after losing the caucus, were itching to cause trouble at the Paris. That’s why he induced Sanders to put out the unity statement the night before.

Reid, who endorsed Clinton shortly after helping her win the caucus, has iron-fisted control over the party apparatus and has for many years. Chairwoman Lange answers to him and his operatives, but that does not, as the twisted transitive property of Sandersophiles seems to conclude, mean she is corrupt.

What’s more, the whole arrangement has worked pretty well, turning the Nevada Democratic Party into one of the most formidable organizations in the country. Since 2008, and with last cycle the only blip, the Democratic Party in Nevada has overseen two presidential victories, a miraculous Reid re-election and many lower-ballot wins, thanks to a legal money-laundering operation and a massive voter registration vehicle.

Sometimes the Establishment is, you know, the good guys, especially when, you know, they win a lot of seats. That's what parties are suppsoed to do, not be outlets for malcontents who have empty social lives or rabble rousers without a cause.

The stage was set before the gavel came down Saturday, and it’s clear party officials were ready for the Sanders delegates to try to disrupt the convention. (Indeed, the Sanders campaign had tried to have standard “if you disrupt, you get thrown out” language removed from the rules before the convention.)

Much of what occurred was inflamed by Democratic National Committeewoman Erin Bilbray, who fired up the Sanders folks about the issues that caused the lawsuit and then started shouting at the Paris about “Roberta’s rules” being used instead of “Robert’s Rules.” Some context: Ironically, Bilbray started a group called Emerge, designed to help elect Democratic women, before she decided to work against the potential first female Democratic president. Bilbray has been fine with the party for years and was grudgingly anointed by Reid to run for Congress in 2014, a race she lost by 25 percentage points.

She has been clutching at relevancy ever since, attacking the Establishment and by extension, Reid, who was a close political ally of her father, ex-Rep. Jim Bilbray, a Clinton supporter.

Yes, Nevada is a small state.

Bilbray led the charge soon after the convention began to try to institute rule changes – a scene like many others repeated at countless conventions here and everywhere. But Lange, knowing that there were more Clinton delegates, disregarded the louder Sanders contingent on a voice vote, and cut it off, which began the march toward chaos.

The slow simmer toward the boiling over that evening began as at least two national Sanders operatives – Joan Kato, the former state director who became national delegate overseer for the campaign, and attorney Matt Berg – were in the room. There would later be debates over credentials – again, this occurs at every convention –with Sanders people complaining that they were illegally denied access.

When security called for the convention to end, it descended into screaming, chair-throwing and obscenities, with many videos like this one (warning: language) posted online to show the chaos. Congressional hopeful Jesse Sbaih, a Bernie backer, was up on stage for a moment in the sun. Others, too, tried to wrest control from Lange; some Berners charged the stage, according to numerous witnesses.

It was ugly; maybe not Chicago ’68 ugly, but ugly.

Despite all of this, the Sunday chalking of the walls and sidewalks and the social media nastiness still going on, some facts are ineluctable, some of them elucidated in this post from the state Democratic Party:

►Sanders lost the caucus on Feb. 20. He had no right to the most delegates, even if the Clinton campaign was asleep at the switch for the county conventions. The Sanders campaign simply did not follow through. As the Medium post reveals, the Sanders folks just did not show up; the Clinton delegates did:

Clinton only had 27 delegate positions vacant on Saturday. Sanders left 462 vacant. Clinton filled 98 percent of her available delegate slots at the State Convention, and Sanders only filled 78 percent of his available delegate slots.

End of story. They lost

►On the 64 delegates the Sanders campaign insists should have been seated, the Democratic Party post reveals only six showed up and:

The remaining potential delegates were ineligible for two main reasons: 1) They were not registered Democratic voters in Nevada by May 1, 2016, and 2) Their information — such as address, date of birth and name — could not be found or identified, and they did not respond to requests from the party and campaigns to correct it.

Rules, it appears, have no place in a revolution.

“They're lazy, they don't read the rules and when the rules are pointed out to them, they cry by exaggerating some Democratic talking point (everyone should participate, rules are unfair, it's mean to do this),” said one longtime Democrat who attended what he called his "first and last convention.”

The credentials committee, made up of half Sanders and half Clinton supporters, had no ability to simply toss rules such as May 1 registration date. The Sanders folks repeatedly raised what neutral observers said were either red herrings or nonsensical arguments, including that parking was so difficult some got there very late.

One eyewitness described it thusly: "There was some guy testifying that he missed getting in line because he stopped for a cigarette or got the wrong directions from the concierge. Or some guy who wasn't registered to vote but brought an incomplete registration application with him, and the Bernie folks would say ‘He clearly wants to participate, we're Democrats and we're inclusive.’”

Soon after the convention ended, Angie Morelli, a Sanders organizer who previously had posted a petition talking about the pilfering of democracy, sent out a “news” release with the all-caps headline: “ALLEGATIONS OF GROSS CORRUPTION NEARLY CAUSE A RIOT AT THE NEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION “

Morelli led with Lange having to “flee” the convention and added, “Delegates from the convention reported instances in which Lange repeatedly ignored petitions, motions from the floor, and even appeared to rule against the clear majority in multiple voice votes, leading to a convention full of enraged and shocked delegates.”

Uh huh.

Morelli goes on to complain about Lange trying to have a megaphone she used confiscated – the horror! – and then focus on a so-called “minority report” from the credentials committee, presented by a Sanders member to talk about the supposedly denied delegates.

So how many of the delegates believe in the ghosts that the Bilbray-Morelli caucus conjure?

Said one keen observer: “It's a minority, sure, but the problem is the Sanders people use them. Rile them, send them out there, profit from the chaos but disclaim (sometimes, and weakly) responsibility. That ‘minority report’ last night is a perfect example. They drafted it, manipulated a Sanders member of the credentials committee into demanding it be delivered, then profited from the rumor that the delegates were stolen. That's brilliant, sure, but also pretty sick.”

And to what end, really?

Let’s suppose the worst – that the Sanders delegates were improperly denied (even though 56 of the 64 weren't there) and Sanders had more delegates than Clinton and Sanders won the day. Then what?

Sanders is still going to lose the nomination by a little something called math, barring anything unforeseen. And are Bilbray, Morelli and other Berniebots going to make the Nevada Democratic Party better by filling slots to take control of an organization that has dominated Nevada politics and been copycatted by Republicans? What exactly do they bring to the table except blind fury and guaranteed disorganization? (Will Bilbray run the party like her congressional campaign? If so, Nevada will be red for years to come.)

I have little doubt that Lange was given orders from Reidworld to try to keep order and not let the Sanders delegates take over. So what?

Does this merit the Sanders folks posting he personal information so she is getting death threats and messages that they know where her grandchild goes to school?

Clinton has a difficult needle-threading job keeping the Sanders voters in the tent as she moves toward November. But if Sanders does not soon disavow what his team here has overseen -- and even the senator may not be able to douse the wildfire he lit -- there is no reason to believe that what happened at the Paris in May will not happen at the Wells Fargo Center in July.
 
Wow If Obama would have did all of this he would not have Became president
 
Similarities between Trump & Sanders supporters (or at least a segment of their support) ???
 
If he has not already done so, should not Bernie, just as demand was made of Trump, come out strongly with his supporters to knock off the violence, etc. ???
 
If he has not already done so, should not Bernie, just as demand was made of Trump, come out strongly with his supporters to knock off the violence, etc. ???

They are low key condoning the behavior, just like the GOP did with the teaparty to harness their energy. Just like the teaparty, they will probably take over too. Though if they are true liberals like occupy, (and not GOP/3rd party plants as some have claimed) they don't tend to have the long term stamina. I guess it will depend on how angry they really are. Dems tend to organize for a season and fade away. GOP have the chronic long term simmering of anger and hatred.

Anything can happen between now and the DNC convention, but since the Bernie campaign has been signaling they are going to stay in the race until then to try to flip super delegates, his supporters are taking their cues from that. I fully expect them to show up and show out at the DNC convention.
 
Anything can happen between now and the DNC convention, but since the Bernie campaign has been signaling they are going to stay in the race until then to try to flip super delegates, his supporters are taking their cues from that. I fully expect them to show up and show out at the DNC convention.

Keen observations C! A bit concerned at the moment that if this continues/worsens, it may be difficult, if not impossible, to unify the ticket during and in the aftermath of the DNC to defeat the Bellicose Blowhard.
 
From Bernie Sanders Supporters, Death Threats Over Delegates

:smh:

They just can't help themselves....

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/17/u...evada.html?smid=tw-nytpolitics&smtyp=cur&_r=0

Thrown chairs. Leaked cellphone numbers. Death threats spewed across the Internet.

No, this is not the work of Donald J. Trump supporters, some of whom have harassed critics of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. It was angry supporters of Senator Bernie Sanders who were directing their ire at the Nevada Democratic Party — and its chairwoman, Roberta Lange — over a state convention on Saturday that they think was emblematic of a rigged political system.

“It’s been vile,” said Ms. Lange, who riled Sanders supporters by refusing their requests for rule changes at the event in Las Vegas. “It’s been threatening messages, threatening my family, threatening my life, threatening my grandchild.”

The vicious response has come as millions of new voters, many of whom felt excluded by establishment politicians, have flocked to the insurgent campaigns of Mr. Sanders and Mr. Trump. Mr. Trump has all but locked up the nomination, but many backers of Mr. Sanders remain enraged as his hopes of being the Democratic candidate dwindle.

Although Hillary Clinton won the Nevada caucuses in February, the Sanders campaign worked hard to win delegates at county conventions and was hopeful that it could emerge from the state with an equal number of delegates or more. But the state convention, held at the Paris Las Vegas Hotel, deteriorated into chaos after nearly 60 of Mr. Sanders’s potential delegates were deemed ineligible amid a dispute over the rules. The convention concluded abruptly after security staff no longer felt it could ensure the safety of the participants, many of whom were yelling and throwing things.

Though the raucous Republican nominating fight was the one that appeared to be careering toward a contested convention, the drawn-out fight on the Democratic side has emerged as an ugly intraparty feud in its own right, threatening hopes for unity ahead of the July convention in Philadelphia. Mr. Sanders faces a virtually insurmountable delegate deficit, but has pledged to carry on his campaign despite the long odds.

Mr. Sanders has promised, if he is not the nominee, to help defeat Mr. Trump, and even though he has scaled back his attacks against Mrs. Clinton he still asserts that he would be a better general election candidate. The Sanders campaign is still fighting vigorously for every delegate that remains on the table, and his supporters have shown little sign of warming to his opponent.

“What Nevada shows is the kindling is there,” Joe Trippi, a Democratic strategist, said of the energy within Mr. Sanders’s base of support. “The question is, what is he going to do with it?”

The backlash against Ms. Lange in Nevada echoes what happened in Colorado last month when supporters of Mr. Trump bombarded Steve House, the chairman of the State Republican Party, with complaints of disenfranchisement. He received thousands of calls after his cellphone number was disseminated online.

Supporters of Mr. Sanders used similar tactics to exert pressure on Ms. Lange, who has received more than 1,000 calls since Saturday night and as many as three text messages per minute. The threats, which came from men and women from across the country, were haunting and personal.

“Loved how you broke the system,” one person wrote in a text message that said he or she knew where Ms. Lange’s grandchildren went to school. “Prepare for hell. Calls won’t stop.”

Another person left a voice mail message saying he thought Ms. Lange should be “hung in public execution” for her actions.

“I’m scared for my family,” Ms. Lange said. “Scared for my kids.”

Michael Briggs, a spokesman for Mr. Sanders, said the Vermont senator did not condone violence of any kind. However, he said the campaign was still determining whether it would challenge the Nevada results.

“The senator believes that the Democratic Party all over the country would serve its own interests better if it were to figure out a way to welcome people who have been energized and excited by his campaign into the party,” Mr. Briggs said. “It would behoove the party to be more welcoming and engage those people.”

The Democratic National Committee is hoping that what happened in Las Vegas stays there and that the prospect of Mr. Trump’s winning the presidency brings the party together in time for the July convention.

“We’re confident that Democrats will be united and energized at our convention and throughout the general election,” said Mark Paustenbach, a committee spokesman. “Our candidates have each said they will work hard to make sure that Donald Trump and his dangerous and divisive policies never set foot in the Oval Office.”
 
If he has not already done so, should not Bernie, just as demand was made of Trump, come out strongly with his supporters to knock off the violence, etc. ???

Statement from Bernie's campaign. They are just giving those idiots a pass to keep doing what they are doing.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/sand...se-to-say-campaign-has-penchant-for-violence/

Bernie Sanders supporters caused chaos and things got violent at the Nevada Democratic convention this past weekend, and amid calls from the state party chair and the head of the DNC to denounce the violence, Sanders released a statement this afternoon without such an apology.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid was quick today to say how Sanders responds to this is a “test of leadership,” following yesterday’s letter from the Nevada Democrats to the DNC warning that the “penchant” for violence in the Sanders camp could bode poorly for Philadelphia.

Well, Sanders declares in the statement today that it’s “nonsense” to say such a thing. This is how he responded to calls to denounce the violence from his supporters:

Our campaign has held giant rallies all across this country, including in high crime areas, and there have been zero reports of violence. Our campaign of course believes in non-violent change and it goes without saying that I condemn any and all forms of violence, including the personal harassment of individuals. But, when we speak of violence, I should add here that months ago, during the Nevada campaign, shots were fired into my campaign office in Nevada and an apartment housing my campaign staff was broken into and ransacked.

He proceeds to denounce the supposedly unfair delegate system in Nevada in which the state Democrats “used its power to prevent a fair and transparent process from taking place.”

You can read the full statement here:

It is imperative that the Democratic leadership, both nationally and in the states, understand that the political world is changing and that millions of Americans are outraged at establishment politics and establishment economics. The people of this country want a government which represents all of us, not just the 1 percent, super PACs and wealthy campaign contributors.


The Democratic Party has a choice. It can open its doors and welcome into the party people who are prepared to fight for real economic and social change – people who are willing to take on Wall Street, corporate greed and a fossil fuel industry which is destroying this planet. Or the party can choose to maintain its status quo structure, remain dependent on big-money campaign contributions and be a party with limited participation and limited energy.


Within the last few days there have been a number of criticisms made against my campaign organization. Party leaders in Nevada, for example, claim that the Sanders campaign has a ‘penchant for violence.’ That is nonsense. Our campaign has held giant rallies all across this country, including in high-crime areas, and there have been zero reports of violence. Our campaign of course believes in non-violent change and it goes without saying that I condemn any and all forms of violence, including the personal harassment of individuals. But, when we speak of violence, I should add here that months ago, during the Nevada campaign, shots were fired into my campaign office in Nevada and apartment housing complex my campaign staff lived in was broken into and ransacked.


If the Democratic Party is to be successful in November, it is imperative that all state parties treat our campaign supporters with fairness and the respect that they have earned. I am happy to say that has been the case at state conventions in Maine, Alaska, Colorado and Hawaii where good discussions were held and democratic decisions were reached. Unfortunately, that was not the case at the Nevada convention. At that convention the Democratic leadership used its power to prevent a fair and transparent process from taking place. Among other things:


The chair of the convention announced that the convention rules passed on voice vote, when the vote was a clear no-vote. At the very least, the Chair should have allowed for a headcount.


The chair allowed its Credentials Committee to en mass rule that 64 delegates were ineligible without offering an opportunity for 58 of them to be heard. That decision enabled the Clinton campaign to end up with a 30-vote majority.


The chair refused to acknowledge any motions made from the floor or allow votes on them.


The chair refused to accept any petitions for amendments to the rules that were properly submitted.

These are on top of failures at the precinct and county conventions including trying to depose and then threaten with arrest the Clark County convention credentials chair because she was operating too fairly.
 
continuing right along . . .


Progressive blogger fired for calling Hillary Clinton ally a 'scumbag'


By Kristen East

05/21/16 10:03 AM EDT


A progressive blogger was fired Friday for referring to a Hillary Clinton ally as a “scumbag,” igniting a fiery social-media exchange between the two and other high-profile writers who are at odds over the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The comment from Matt Bruenig, who wrote about philosophy and political economy at liberal think tank, Demos, came after a Twitter back-and-forth between Bruenig and Joan Walsh, a writer for The Nation, on a piece Walsh wrote, which is entitled, “Bernie Sanders is hurting himself by playing the victim.”

Walsh tweeted that she rejects “the moral superiority of a coalition led by white men vs. the will of black, brown and female voters” while linking to the article. Bruenig responded directly, arguing that the divide between the two Democratic candidates is “really about old people versus young people.” He accused Walsh of having a “level of animus towards young people. It’s kind of disgusting.”


Tb6hgKgT_bigger.jpg
Joan WalshVerified account‏@joanwalsh May 19

Joan Walsh Retweeted Matt Bruenig​

Matt, you're becoming a troll.
===========================================================================================​

Matt Bruenig ‏@MattBruenig May 19

@joanwalsh Your dishonesty on these topics is only matched by your level of animus towards young people. It's kind of disgusting.

============================================================================================​


Neera Tanden, the president of the Center for American Progress, eventually jumped in to the conversation, which by that point had shifted to welfare reform.

Bruenig said Tanden “tried to starve me and my mother because she wanted to be in Democratic politics,” and advanced the position that Tanden supported welfare reform in the 1990s, when Bill Clinton was president. Bruenig has been critical of Clinton in his writings, calling her "an enemy of the poor" and "a garbage rich person."

Tanden tweeted at Bruenig that “having been on welfare myself, don’t need lectures on this topic from you.”

Bruenig replied with this tweet: “Scumbag Neera uses welfare when she needs it then takes away from others when they need it. Disgusting.”


Neera Tanden ‏@neeratanden May 19

@MattBruenig @joanwalsh having been on welfare myself, don't need lectures on this topic from you. Thanks though.

=============================================================================================​

Matt Bruenig‏@MattBruenig May 19

@neeratanden @joanwalsh Scumbag Neera uses welfare when she needs it then takes away from others when they need it. Disgusting.

==============================================================================================

Tanden responded that she “never worked on welfare reform,” and that the suggestion that she supported cutting from the program is a lie.

Demos then responded to the ongoing Twitter thread, calling Bruenig’s tweets “unacceptable,” and apologized for his words.


ziYMzIOb_normal.png
Demos

‎@Demos_Org

.@Demos_Org encourages debate, not personal attacks. Here's where we stand:
http://www.demos.org/press-release/reflections-social-media-and-our-responsibility …

===============================================================================================​


The organization released a lengthy statement Friday night detailing its differences with Bruenig, who has more than 270,000 Twitter followers, and his departure from the group.

The statement also highlighted the ongoing feud between factions of the Democratic Party, saying “it has been a particularly challenging place for progressives on opposite sides during the Democratic primary, and we know that there is a Sanders versus Clinton overlay to the Twitter exchange on Thursday night.”

Later, Bruenig apparently set up a GoFundMe page for one cause, "The Bruenig Bailout." According to the page, 654 people raised nearly $25,000 in 13 hours. The listed goal was $10,000, and Bruenig has since closed off donations.

Bruenig hasn't responded to POLITICO's request for comment.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald also jumped into the conversation to suggest that Tanden had influenced Demos' decision to part ways with Bruenig.

Demos then responded to the ongoing Twitter thread, calling Bruenig’s tweets “unacceptable,” and apologized for his words.


The organization released a lengthy statement Friday night detailing its differences with Bruenig, who has more than 270,000 Twitter followers, and his departure from the group.


The statement also highlighted the ongoing feud between factions of the Democratic Party, saying “it has been a particularly challenging place for progressives on opposite sides during the Democratic primary, and we know that there is a Sanders versus Clinton overlay to the Twitter exchange on Thursday night.”

Later, Bruenig apparently set up a GoFundMe page for one cause, "The Bruenig Bailout." According to the page, 654 people raised nearly $25,000 in 13 hours. The listed goal was $10,000, and Bruenig has since closed off donations.

Bruenig hasn't responded to POLITICO's request for comment.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald also jumped into the conversation to suggest that Tanden had influenced Demos' decision to part ways with Bruenig.nden and Walsh both tweeted as recently as Saturday morning to say they hadn't learned of Bruenig's firing until after it had happened.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/matt-bruenig-neera-tanden-joan-walsh-hillary-clinton-223439#ixzz49KPxTDOk
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
 
continuing right along . . .


Progressive blogger fired for calling Hillary Clinton ally a 'scumbag'


By Kristen East

05/21/16 10:03 AM EDT


A progressive blogger was fired Friday for referring to a Hillary Clinton ally as a “scumbag,” igniting a fiery social-media exchange between the two and other high-profile writers who are at odds over the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The comment from Matt Bruenig, who wrote about philosophy and political economy at liberal think tank, Demos, came after a Twitter back-and-forth between Bruenig and Joan Walsh, a writer for The Nation, on a piece Walsh wrote, which is entitled, “Bernie Sanders is hurting himself by playing the victim.”

Walsh tweeted that she rejects “the moral superiority of a coalition led by white men vs. the will of black, brown and female voters” while linking to the article. Bruenig responded directly, arguing that the divide between the two Democratic candidates is “really about old people versus young people.” He accused Walsh of having a “level of animus towards young people. It’s kind of disgusting.”


Tb6hgKgT_bigger.jpg
Joan WalshVerified account‏@joanwalsh May 19

Joan Walsh Retweeted Matt Bruenig​

Matt, you're becoming a troll.
===========================================================================================​

Matt Bruenig ‏@MattBruenig May 19

@joanwalsh Your dishonesty on these topics is only matched by your level of animus towards young people. It's kind of disgusting.

============================================================================================​


Neera Tanden, the president of the Center for American Progress, eventually jumped in to the conversation, which by that point had shifted to welfare reform.

Bruenig said Tanden “tried to starve me and my mother because she wanted to be in Democratic politics,” and advanced the position that Tanden supported welfare reform in the 1990s, when Bill Clinton was president. Bruenig has been critical of Clinton in his writings, calling her "an enemy of the poor" and "a garbage rich person."

Tanden tweeted at Bruenig that “having been on welfare myself, don’t need lectures on this topic from you.”

Bruenig replied with this tweet: “Scumbag Neera uses welfare when she needs it then takes away from others when they need it. Disgusting.”


Neera Tanden ‏@neeratanden May 19

@MattBruenig @joanwalsh having been on welfare myself, don't need lectures on this topic from you. Thanks though.

=============================================================================================​

Matt Bruenig‏@MattBruenig May 19

@neeratanden @joanwalsh Scumbag Neera uses welfare when she needs it then takes away from others when they need it. Disgusting.

==============================================================================================

Tanden responded that she “never worked on welfare reform,” and that the suggestion that she supported cutting from the program is a lie.

Demos then responded to the ongoing Twitter thread, calling Bruenig’s tweets “unacceptable,” and apologized for his words.


ziYMzIOb_normal.png
Demos

‎@Demos_Org

.@Demos_Org encourages debate, not personal attacks. Here's where we stand:
http://www.demos.org/press-release/reflections-social-media-and-our-responsibility …

===============================================================================================​


The organization released a lengthy statement Friday night detailing its differences with Bruenig, who has more than 270,000 Twitter followers, and his departure from the group.

The statement also highlighted the ongoing feud between factions of the Democratic Party, saying “it has been a particularly challenging place for progressives on opposite sides during the Democratic primary, and we know that there is a Sanders versus Clinton overlay to the Twitter exchange on Thursday night.”

Later, Bruenig apparently set up a GoFundMe page for one cause, "The Bruenig Bailout." According to the page, 654 people raised nearly $25,000 in 13 hours. The listed goal was $10,000, and Bruenig has since closed off donations.

Bruenig hasn't responded to POLITICO's request for comment.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald also jumped into the conversation to suggest that Tanden had influenced Demos' decision to part ways with Bruenig.

Demos then responded to the ongoing Twitter thread, calling Bruenig’s tweets “unacceptable,” and apologized for his words.


The organization released a lengthy statement Friday night detailing its differences with Bruenig, who has more than 270,000 Twitter followers, and his departure from the group.


The statement also highlighted the ongoing feud between factions of the Democratic Party, saying “it has been a particularly challenging place for progressives on opposite sides during the Democratic primary, and we know that there is a Sanders versus Clinton overlay to the Twitter exchange on Thursday night.”

Later, Bruenig apparently set up a GoFundMe page for one cause, "The Bruenig Bailout." According to the page, 654 people raised nearly $25,000 in 13 hours. The listed goal was $10,000, and Bruenig has since closed off donations.

Bruenig hasn't responded to POLITICO's request for comment.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald also jumped into the conversation to suggest that Tanden had influenced Demos' decision to part ways with Bruenig.nden and Walsh both tweeted as recently as Saturday morning to say they hadn't learned of Bruenig's firing until after it had happened.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/matt-bruenig-neera-tanden-joan-walsh-hillary-clinton-223439#ixzz49KPxTDOk
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
 
continuing right along . . .


Progressive blogger fired for calling Hillary Clinton ally a 'scumbag'


By Kristen East

05/21/16 10:03 AM EDT


A progressive blogger was fired Friday for referring to a Hillary Clinton ally as a “scumbag,” igniting a fiery social-media exchange between the two and other high-profile writers who are at odds over the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The comment from Matt Bruenig, who wrote about philosophy and political economy at liberal think tank, Demos, came after a Twitter back-and-forth between Bruenig and Joan Walsh, a writer for The Nation, on a piece Walsh wrote, which is entitled, “Bernie Sanders is hurting himself by playing the victim.”

Walsh tweeted that she rejects “the moral superiority of a coalition led by white men vs. the will of black, brown and female voters” while linking to the article. Bruenig responded directly, arguing that the divide between the two Democratic candidates is “really about old people versus young people.” He accused Walsh of having a “level of animus towards young people. It’s kind of disgusting.”


Tb6hgKgT_bigger.jpg
Joan WalshVerified account‏@joanwalsh May 19

Joan Walsh Retweeted Matt Bruenig​

Matt, you're becoming a troll.
===========================================================================================​

Matt Bruenig ‏@MattBruenig May 19

@joanwalsh Your dishonesty on these topics is only matched by your level of animus towards young people. It's kind of disgusting.

============================================================================================​


Neera Tanden, the president of the Center for American Progress, eventually jumped in to the conversation, which by that point had shifted to welfare reform.

Bruenig said Tanden “tried to starve me and my mother because she wanted to be in Democratic politics,” and advanced the position that Tanden supported welfare reform in the 1990s, when Bill Clinton was president. Bruenig has been critical of Clinton in his writings, calling her "an enemy of the poor" and "a garbage rich person."

Tanden tweeted at Bruenig that “having been on welfare myself, don’t need lectures on this topic from you.”

Bruenig replied with this tweet: “Scumbag Neera uses welfare when she needs it then takes away from others when they need it. Disgusting.”


Neera Tanden ‏@neeratanden May 19

@MattBruenig @joanwalsh having been on welfare myself, don't need lectures on this topic from you. Thanks though.

=============================================================================================​
Matt Bruenig‏@MattBruenig May 19

@neeratanden @joanwalsh Scumbag Neera uses welfare when she needs it then takes away from others when they need it. Disgusting.

==============================================================================================

Tanden responded that she “never worked on welfare reform,” and that the suggestion that she supported cutting from the program is a lie.

Demos then responded to the ongoing Twitter thread, calling Bruenig’s tweets “unacceptable,” and apologized for his words.


ziYMzIOb_normal.png
Demos

‎@Demos_Org

.@Demos_Org encourages debate, not personal attacks. Here's where we stand:
http://www.demos.org/press-release/reflections-social-media-and-our-responsibility …

===============================================================================================​


The organization released a lengthy statement Friday night detailing its differences with Bruenig, who has more than 270,000 Twitter followers, and his departure from the group.

The statement also highlighted the ongoing feud between factions of the Democratic Party, saying “it has been a particularly challenging place for progressives on opposite sides during the Democratic primary, and we know that there is a Sanders versus Clinton overlay to the Twitter exchange on Thursday night.”

Later, Bruenig apparently set up a GoFundMe page for one cause, "The Bruenig Bailout." According to the page, 654 people raised nearly $25,000 in 13 hours. The listed goal was $10,000, and Bruenig has since closed off donations.

Bruenig hasn't responded to POLITICO's request for comment.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald also jumped into the conversation to suggest that Tanden had influenced Demos' decision to part ways with Bruenig.

Demos then responded to the ongoing Twitter thread, calling Bruenig’s tweets “unacceptable,” and apologized for his words.


The organization released a lengthy statement Friday night detailing its differences with Bruenig, who has more than 270,000 Twitter followers, and his departure from the group.


The statement also highlighted the ongoing feud between factions of the Democratic Party, saying “it has been a particularly challenging place for progressives on opposite sides during the Democratic primary, and we know that there is a Sanders versus Clinton overlay to the Twitter exchange on Thursday night.”

Later, Bruenig apparently set up a GoFundMe page for one cause, "The Bruenig Bailout." According to the page, 654 people raised nearly $25,000 in 13 hours. The listed goal was $10,000, and Bruenig has since closed off donations.

Bruenig hasn't responded to POLITICO's request for comment.

Journalist Glenn Greenwald also jumped into the conversation to suggest that Tanden had influenced Demos' decision to part ways with Bruenig.nden and Walsh both tweeted as recently as Saturday morning to say they hadn't learned of Bruenig's firing until after it had happened.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/matt-bruenig-neera-tanden-joan-walsh-hillary-clinton-223439#ixzz49KPxTDOk
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook


If it were one or two people, it would be one thing, but it seems like Bernie's most vocal supporters embrace a culture of disrespect and personal attacks.
 
Democrats move to quell convention chaos

A new set of rules is designed to avoid another state convention debacle.

By Gabriel Debenedetti and Daniel Strauss

05/20/16 08:03 PM EDT

90

After chaos in Nevada, leaders of the Democratic Party are proposing a series of short-term fixes to prevent mayhem from breaking out in other states. | AP Photo


PHILADELPHIA — Democratic Party leaders are proposing a set of new rules governing conduct at upcoming state party conventions to avoid a repeat of the chaos in Nevada that sent chills up the spines of Democrats nationwide.

With both the Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton campaigns agreeing to follow through, it’s a positive first step forward in the wake of a raucous state convention that laid bare the divide between Sanders supporters and the Democratic establishment.

But the new guidelines — the most extensive response yet from national Democrats to Saturday’s blow-up — merely represent short-term fixes, rather than broad gestures designed to placate frustrated Sanders supporters who feel the Democratic Party apparatus has worked against their interests.

“Now is that going to change some diehards’ minds about how they should look at the party and stuff? I don't know. Probably not,” said Idaho Democratic Party chairman Bert Marley. “But I think it will help with a lot of people that are new to the process and just are having a little trouble figuring out what's going on. I think that's more what this is addressed to: how do we help these people navigate through the process so their voices are heard and they can walk away with it whether they're successful or not and say, 'I made a difference, I was part of the process.'”

The proposals, put forth by New Hampshire Democratic Party Chairman Raymond Buckley, president of the Association of State Democratic Chairs, came at a Friday meeting devoted to logistical talk about July national convention planning but where Saturday’s blow-up was still very much on the minds of party chairs and officials.

Speaking to fellow party chairs at the Sheraton Downtown hotel here, Buckley laid down a set of rules that would commit the Democratic National Committee and both campaigns to maintaining an active presence at the remaining events.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/democrats-convention-rules-223437#ixzz49Kcgpiuc
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-5-21_17-19-47.gif
    upload_2016-5-21_17-19-47.gif
    37 bytes · Views: 1
  • upload_2016-5-21_17-19-47.gif
    upload_2016-5-21_17-19-47.gif
    37 bytes · Views: 1
  • upload_2016-5-21_17-19-47.gif
    upload_2016-5-21_17-19-47.gif
    37 bytes · Views: 4
  • upload_2016-5-21_17-19-47.gif
    upload_2016-5-21_17-19-47.gif
    37 bytes · Views: 1
Sooo, this is trending on twitter right now, though it's probably mostly due to his supporters pushing back.
The Dailykos community can be fickle. They don't stay loyal long, but it sounds like Markos is trying to unify them around
Hillary now that the writing is on the wall regarding the democratic nomination.


http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/05/bernie-sanders-loses-his-halo-213911

Is the left turning on its darling, Bernie Sanders? On Friday, Netroots titan Markos Moulitsas, namesake of the liberal Daily Kos, dropped a rhetorical bomb on the Bern, blaming the candidate for doing too little to denounce death threats received by the Nevada Democratic Party after Sanders’ state convention delegates complained they had received unfair treatment. “The problem isn't Bernie Sanders' supporters,” Moulitsas wrote. “It's Bernie Sanders himself … [He] refuses to forcefully and unambiguously reject that violence, instead rationalizing and explaining it away with a mix of grievances and outright conspiracy theory.”

Actually, Sanders hasn’t lost much support among his most avid supporters—who do not include Moulitsas, a sometime critic. What we are seeing, however, is that it’s no longer taboo in liberal circles to attack Sanders as he drags out the nomination process at a time when many are itching to turn their fire on Donald Trump. And if his reputation in the party is being damaged outside his base, that will make it harder for him to extract concessions from Clinton regarding the platform and party nomination rules at the convention.

Through much of the campaign, Sanders wore a progressive halo, making it tricky for Clinton to play classic hardball politics (not that she didn’t try). Even if Democratic voters didn’t believe he was the practical choice, his platform still spoke to the ideological aspirations of many in the party. His supporters heard, “I like Bernie, but…” so much that they turned it into a website providing information designed to assuage unsure voters.

Much of the warm, fuzzy sentiment was based on a perception of Sanders as a non-politician, a man so wedded to his ideals that he would not besmirch them by engaging in petty politics. Democrats of all stripes lauded Sanders in October when he went out of his way to keep the debate focus on policy and take an enticing line of attack off the table, thundering, “The American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails.”

But in the months that followed, the Sanders campaign adopted an increasingly harder edge, gradually depriving him of angelic protections. Now, with only six states remaining on the primary calendar, the delegate math harder and harder to ignore, and the Clinton’s lead over Donald Trump short of insurmountable, partisan impulses on the left are kicking in, and patience for squabbles is wearing thin.

This week another prominent figure in the online progressive community, Talking Points Memo’s Josh Marshall, also blamed Sanders directly for the increased animosity, saying: “The 'burn it down' attitude, the upping the ante … seems to be coming from Sanders himself. Right from the top.” Mother Jones’ Kevin Drum said more in sorrow than in anger this week, “It's sort of painful to see a good person like Bernie turned into such a sullen and resentful man.”

Still, neither Marshall nor Drum, like Moulitsas, had been an active Sanders supporter.

Two months ago, Moulitsas declared the primaries effectively over and banned from his site “malicious attacks on our presumptive presidential nominee or our presidential efforts.” Last month Drum said Sanders was “basically running a con … we were never going to get a revolution, and Bernie knew it all along.” Marshall has been neutral, but has shown flashes of Sanders skepticism, such as when he characterized his economic critique as a “somewhat one-dimensional diagnosis.”

Perhaps the toughest shot Sanders has taken from inside his tent is from liberal commentator Sally Kohn. She stopped short of switching allegiances, but in a column for Time, she admonished Sanders for his Nevada response: “This is unacceptable behavior. Sanders has condemned it, but not forcefully enough for my taste.”

And, in case anyone thought the race was almost over, there’s still plenty of defiant commentary coming back from the Sanders camp. Radio talker Thom Hartmann, who for years gave Sanders a national platform with his weekly “Brunch with Bernie” segments, disavowed any violence but urged the Democratic Party leadership to heed the anger expressed in Nevada and “earn our votes.”

Sanders likely grasps the potential danger of alienating too many progressives. Despite the charges that the toxicity comes “from the top” of the Sanders campaign, Bloomberg News reports that Sanders has personally reached out to fellow senators and given “behind-the-scenes assurances” that he “understands the need for party unity.” If so, Sanders may be deliberately walking a tightrope: keeping his supporters animated to maximize his delegate count and his leverage, while preparing for the eventual pivot towards compromise in Philadelphia.

He may believe this is a safe line to walk, remembering the intense yet ephemeral acrimony of the 2008 campaign. The Washington Post’s Greg Sargent compared the polls from then and now and concluded that “the percentage of Clinton’s supporters in 2008 who seemed prepared to bolt was marginally larger than the percentage of Sanders supporters who now say the same.” However, there was no convention floor fight in 2008 to stoke the embers of disunity.

The ideological goals of Sanders and his voters both overlap and compete with the goal of Democratic harmony, complicating his strategic decision-making. But he could try to transcend the binary choice between confrontation and reconciliation.

If there’s one thing Sanders can’t stand, is a media distracted by food fights and ignoring matters of substance. Last August he challenged a reporter asking him about his differences with Clinton, saying, “[The] corporate media talks about all kinds of issues except the most important issues. OK? And time after time I’m being asked to criticize Hillary Clinton. That’s the sport that you guys like. The reason this campaign is doing well? Because we’re talking about the issues that impact the American people.”

Right now, the media is getting a lot of the sport it likes, and Sanders is getting a lot less of what he likes. He might consider delivering a speech on how giving reporters fodder for stories about discord only serves to take the spotlight away from income inequality and corporate influence over democracy – which would be a way to urge better behavior from his supporters without sounding like he’s scolding them.

Because if Bernie wants to own the moral high ground at the convention, he’ll need to return the focus of his campaign to the issues in its final days.
 
If there’s one thing Sanders can’t stand, is a media distracted by food fights and ignoring matters of substance. Last August he challenged a reporter asking him about his differences with Clinton, saying, “[The] corporate media talks about all kinds of issues except the most important issues. OK? And time after time I’m being asked to criticize Hillary Clinton. That’s the sport that you guys like. The reason this campaign is doing well? Because we’re talking about the issues that impact the American people.”

This helped to gain my respect and consideration for Bernie.


Right now, the media is getting a lot of the sport it likes, and Sanders is getting a lot less of what he likes. He might consider delivering a speech on how giving reporters fodder for stories about discord only serves to take the spotlight away from income inequality and corporate influence over democracy – which would be a way to urge better behavior from his supporters without sounding like he’s scolding them.

This makes me seriously question my earlier judgment.


.​
 
Bernie Sanders deplores violence, but says

Democratic convention could get 'messy'


http://theweek.com/speedreads/62608...ce-but-says-democratic-convention-could-messy
On Monday in Los Angeles, Bernie Sanders sat down with The Associated Press and talked about the ongoing tensions in the Democratic primary fight and the future of the Democratic Party. "It goes without saying that I condemn all forms of violence, but I hope the media does its job and not exaggerate what happened in Nevada and elsewhere," he said, alluding to raucous fights between Sanders supporters and Democratic officials.

Sanders repeated his assertion that the leadership of the Democratic Party has a choice to make about welcoming in his supporters or just going "to fancy fundraisers, at, you know, $50,000 a plate" and shutting the door on dedicated Sanders fans. "I think if they make the right choice and open the doors to working-class people and young people and create the kind of dynamism that the Democratic Party needs — it's going to be messy," Sanders said. "Democracy is not always nice and quiet and gentle. But that is where the Democratic Party should go."

The interviewer asked, "You think the convention could be messy?" And Sanders replied: "So what? Democracy is messy. Every day of my life is messy. But if you want everything to be quiet and orderly and allow, you know, things to just proceed without vigorous debate, that is not what democracy is about." Sanders then asked what would happen if he won "a major victory in California? Will people say, 'Oh, we're really enthusiastic about Hillary Clinton despite the fact that Bernie Sanders has now won whatever it may be, 25 states, half the states?'" If he won big in California, the Democratic insiders who make up the superdelegates "may rethink that," Sanders said. "That is why you want the process to play out."

California and the five other final states are voting on June 7. So far, Clinton has won 24 states to Sanders' 20. She is leading Sanders by 271 pledged delegates — if you include superdelegates, Clinton needs just 90 more to clinch the nomination — and, according to The Washington Post's calculations, Clinton has won about 2.9 million votes (including caucus states). Watch Sanders talk about the Democratic Party's big decision below. Peter Weber


SOURCE: http://theweek.com/speedreads/626114/startup-claims-identify-criminals-using-facial-clues

.
 
Advice for Divided Democrats


By Robert Reich
May 28, 2016


With the Democratic primaries grinding to a bitter end, I have suggestions for both Clinton and Sanders supporters that neither will like.


First, my advice to Clinton supporters: Don’t try to drum Bernie Sanders out of the race before Hillary Clinton officially gets the nomination (if she in fact does get it).
Some of you say Bernie should bow out because he has no chance of getting the nomination, and his continuing candidacy is harming Hillary Clinton’s chances.

It’s true that Bernie’s chances are slim, but it’s inaccurate to say he has no chance. If you consider only pledged delegates, who have been selected in caucuses and primaries, he’s not all that far behind Hillary Clinton. And the upcoming primary in California — the nation’s most populous state — could possibly alter Sanders’s and Clinton’s relative tallies.

My calculation doesn’t include so-called “superdelegates” — Democratic office holders and other insiders who haven’t been selected through primaries and caucuses. But in this year of anti-establishment fury, it would be unwise for Hillary Clinton to relay on superdelegates to get her over the finish line.

Sanders should stay in the race also because he has attracted a large number of young people and independents. Their passion, excitement, and enthusiasm are critically important to Hillary Clinton’s success, if she’s the nominee, as well the success of other Democrats this year, and, more fundamentally, to the future of American politics.

Finally and not the least, Sanders has been telling a basic truth about the American political economic system — that growing inequality of income and wealth has led inexorably to the increasing political power of those at the top, including big corporations and Wall Street banks. And that political power has stacked the deck in their favor, leading to still wider inequality.

Nothing important can be accomplished — reversing climate change, creating true equal opportunity, overcoming racism, rebuilding the middle class, having a sane and sensible foreign policy — until we reclaim our democracy from the moneyed interests. The longer Bernie Sanders is on stage to deliver this message, the better.​

Next, my advice for Sanders supporters: Be prepared to work hard for Hillary Clinton if she gets the nomination. Some of you say that refusing to fight for or even vote for Hillary will show the Democratic political establishment why it must change its ways.

But the “Democratic political establishment” is nothing but a bunch of people, many of them big donors and fundraisers occupying comfortable and privileged positions, who won’t even be aware that you’ve decided to sit it out — unless Hillary loses to Donald Trump.

Which brings me to those of you who say there’s no real difference between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.That’s just plain wrong. Trump has revealed himself to be a narcissistic, xenophobic, hatemonger who, if elected, would legitimize bigotry, appoint Supreme Court justices with terrible values, and have direct access to the button that could set off a nuclear war.

Hillary may not possess Bernie Sanders’s indignation about the rigging of our economy and democracy, or be willing to go as far in remedying it, but she’s shown herself a capable and responsible leader.

Some of you agree a Trump presidency would be a disaster but claim it would galvanize a forceful progressive movement in response.

That’s unlikely. Rarely if ever in history has a sharp swing to the right moved the political pendulum further back in the opposite direction. Instead, it tends to move the “center” rightward, as did Ronald Reagan’s presidency.

Besides, Trump could do huge and unalterable damage to America and the world in the meantime.

Finally, some of you say even if Hillary is better than Trump, you’re tired of choosing the “lesser of two evils,” and you’re going to vote your conscience by either writing Bernie’s name in, or voting for the Green Party candidate, or not voting at all.

I can’t criticize anyone for voting their conscience, of course. But your conscience should know that a decision not to vote for Hillary, should she become the Democratic nominee, is a de facto decision to help Donald Trump.

Both of my morsels of advice may be hard to swallow. Many Hillary supporters don’t want Bernie to keep campaigning, and many Bernie supporters don’t want to root for Hillary if she gets the nomination.

But swallow it you must — not just for the good of the Democratic Party, but for the good of the nation.​

Robert B. Reich is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies. He served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written fourteen books, including the best sellers “Aftershock, “The Work of Nations," and"Beyond Outrage," and, his most recent, "Saving Capitalism." He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, chairman of Common Cause, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentary, INEQUALITY FOR ALL.


SOURCE: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/05/28/advice_for_divided_democrats_130710.html

.
 


What's going on is really not that complicated.

Turn off the television corporate-media-of distraction (CBS, NBC/MSNBC, ABC, FAKE, CNN) all of whom except FAKE donated $$$$$$ money to Team Billary. They "own" her and they will do whatever they can get away with to elect her without being so blatant about it that they risk waking up the majority of somnolent very very low information American sheeple.

They want Bernie to just go away so that Billary can make that hard right wing turn politically into the mythical political center.

Billary will once again become a vocal supporter of what she called 35 times the "gold standard" Trans-Pacific-Partnership; which is, American people work-for-less and compete with workers in Vietnam who make 36 cents an hour.

Billary wants to start talking that neo-con "American exceptionalism" bullshit; she has the endorsement of the Neo-Cons, the same war mongers & blood thirsty imperialist zionists that pushed clueless BuShit into a $3,000,000,000,000 ($3 Trillion) invasion of Iraq; America's greatest military/ foreign policy FIASCO. She can't start spewing "Neo Con" lies with Bernie on the campaign trail correctly talking about Billary's close friend former Secretary of State and war criminal Henry Kissinger.

Billary wants to campaign in non specifics, her campaign slogan signs say "fighting for us"; what a bold face crock of Bullshit. Billary is fighting for Trans-National Corporations and moneyed elites worldwide who have dropped $$$$$$$$$$$$ millions into the Billary Foundation which is a massive 501c3 slush fund.
That is why she set up a private email server at her house; so she could control which emails went into the government archives. SHE LIES 100% when she said Colin Powell did the same thing; a complete 100% LIE.

Colin had a yahoo.com email account that he used sometimes for U.S. State Department business. ALL OF THOSE emails resided on yahoo.com servers. Even if Colin wanted to erase something compromising to him off of yahoo.com, he couldn't completely do it BECAUSE yahoo.com has redundancy servers all-over-the-world (cloud servers) that have copies of every email he sent and received. HE DID NOT have a private fucking server in his house where he would have total control and could destroy any emails at will.

Most low, low, information American sheeple are too mentally dense to understand what I just outlined. The corporate media who have $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ donated to team Billary is not about to tell the American sheeple the pertinent facts about this Billary email story.

With Bernie still on the campaign trail she can't credibly spew her lies about regulating Wall Street.. She has NO intention of regulating Wall Street, not even in the minimal Dodd-Frank manner. The special Wall Street 15% tax rate will not be touched under Billary, The high tech electronic Wall Street thievery mislabeled High Frequency Trading will stay in place under Billary.

As far as foreign policy goes Billary has given the always-on Green light to Israel to bomb and kill the Palestinians in Gaza & what's left of the West Bank anytime the want. Israel can continue to bulldoze Palestinian homes and create Israeli only settlements at will; the U.S. will remain silent with Billary in the White House. The State of Israel which never had the death penalty in their penal code has now said they will now have the death penalty...but....it will apply ONLY TO PALESTINIANS. Billary will be silent about this.

The Saudi Royals will continue to crucify, yes literally crucify biblical style any opposition and continue to drop U.S. made cluster bombs on Yemen civilians. How the fuck can Billary say anything when the King of Saudi Arabia is a $$$$$$$$$$$$ donor to the Billary foundation????

Want to know how Team Billary operates with their corporate donors??...read the article below. For those of you who won't read it , here is what it reveals in a few sentences. Goldman Sachs, the most powerful bankster firm on Wall Street dropped $$$$$$$$$ money into the Billary for President campaign and the Billary foundation. Hillary's son-in-law whose married to her daughter Chelsea wanted to start a hedge fund. You need credibility and millions to start a hedge fund. Hillary's son-in-law had neither.....so.....the Chairman and CEO of Goldman, Lloyd Blankfein who has earned Billions decides to drop millions into the kids hedge fund. The kid loses 90% of the money.

Sure Billary is going to regulate the banksters on Wall Street.:smh::mad:

Hillarywhore.jpg


https://theintercept.com/2016/05/27...ldman-sachs-ceo-invested-with-her-son-in-law/






Hillary_Clinton_Works_for_Corporate_America.jpg



Hillary Clinton also has the endorsement of war criminal former U.S. Secretary of State HENRY KISSINGER

Hillary_Clinton_Kissinger_Endorsement_June_2013.jpg

“I know Hillary as a person. And as a personal friend, I would say yes, she’d be a good president,” Kissinger said.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...ssinger-endorse-clinton-for-president-almost/


The Nixon Tapes Remind Us What A Vile Creature Henry Kissinger Is

Kissinger said:

"The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy. And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern."
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...0/12/how_can_anyone_defend_kissinger_now.html


Kissinger said:

"Military Men Are Just Dumb, Stupid Animals To Be Used As Pawns In Foreign Policy"



Henry Kissinger WAR CRIMINAL: The Case Against Henry Kissinger

http://depositfiles.com/files/x9otjasr2

 
Last edited:
Democrats’ civil war is only just getting started


bernie-sanders-and-hillary-clinton1.jpg

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton Photo: Getty Images (2)


New York Post
By Matt Rhoades
May 30, 2016


During the last few election cycles, Democrats have gleefully watched as the Republican Party
ripped itself apart in a battle over ideological purity. But they shouldn’t get too comfortable:
Their civil war is upon us, too.

In 2010 and 2012, divisive Senate primaries led to unpalatable GOP general-election candidates
in Nevada, Delaware, Missouri, Indiana and Colorado — all states that could have elected
Republican senators and provided a nearly filibuster-proof majority. Democrats laughed as the
GOP shot itself in the foot.

Now, in 2016, I have three words for Democrats: Winter is here. Your party is now locked in a
fierce civil war, the populists are at the gate and there are more bloody battles in store.

In one corner is the Hillary Clinton wing of the party, represented by the liberal establishment
in the Acela Corridor. These are the left-of-center party leaders interested only in preserving
power.

In the other is the Elizabeth Warren/Bernie Sanders wing that rose to prominence on the backs
of the radical Occupy Wall Street protest movement. Vehemently opposed to American free
enterprise, these extremists are fueled by burning left-wing populism and hostility toward
capitalism. They demonize success by pitting the so-called “one percent” versus the “99
percent,” and have less interest in governing than they do advancing ideological purity.

The growing influence of the Warren/Sanders wing of the party is obvious. Despite spending
nearly $200 million in the Democratic primary, Clinton has still failed to close out a 74-year-old
socialist who doesn’t even comb his hair.

Even though Clinton will eventually stagger to her party’s nomination, the Democratic civil war
is far from over.

The headlines have been dominated by a widening schism led by enraged Sanders supporters
who believe their candidate has been treated unfairly. The clash has also spilled over into key
Senate races. In Florida, for example, an explosive altercation between Senate Minority Leader
Harry Reid and progressive flamethrower Alan Grayson grew so heated that Reid’s security
detail was forced to intervene.

In Pennsylvania, it took nearly $5 million from the liberal DC establishment to push its
candidate for Senate, Katie McGinty, over the finish line against her upstart challengers.

At the top of the ticket, one major point of contention has been the Democrats’ reliance on the
undemocratic superdelegates who have greatly benefited Clinton.

In mid-May, the type of violence that marked the Occupy Wall Street movement erupted at the
Nevada Democratic Convention with competing factions hurling insults, chairs and even death
threats at each other. By mid-week, the Nevada Democratic Party formally filed a complaint
charging the Sanders campaign with “fomenting violence.”

In an extraordinary turn of events, Sanders endorsed and even fundraised for the populist
primary challenger to DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a controversial figure who
co-chaired Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid and has faced accusations of rigging the system for
her in 2016.

As the populists take over, the establishment faces a choice: acquiesce or fight for the heart and
soul of their party. Clinton’s pick for vice president will provide an indication of which direction
she intends to take.

If she names Warren as her running mate, it would be a clear signal the keys have been turned
over to the populists. The Occupy Wall Street crowd that began at Zuccotti Park five years ago
will now potentially be one heartbeat away from leading the free world.

Even if Warren is passed over, she and her acolytes will have left a permanent mark on Clinton
and her party. Under constant pressure, Clinton has lurched leftward on a host of hot-button
issues like trade, criminal justice, energy and her views toward the financial services industry.
Clinton limps out of the bitter Democratic primary a far different candidate than when she
entered last April.

The ultimate victor in this struggle has yet to be determined, but the battle lines have been
drawn, there are many political casualties ahead and the future of the Democratic Party hangs
in the balance.

Matt Rhoades was the campaign manager for Gov. Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential
campaign, and founded the GOP super PAC America Rising and Definers Public Affairs.

SOURCE: http://nypost.com/2016/05/30/democrats-civil-war-is-only-just-getting-started/


.
 
sith_lord_murdoch_0011.png

"Sith Lord" Rupert Murdoch

The article above, post # 23, published in the New York tabloid owned by decrepit Sith Lord Rupert Murdoch; the same person who owns FOX FAKE channel — the opinion piece, written by a RepubliKlan RMoney toady is — 90% pig shit.

The RMoney toady describes Hillary as "left-of-center"..........really??........a woman who voted for the Iraq invasion & occupation, a woman who voted for the bankruptcy bill which makes it very difficult for individuals to discharge unpayable debt in bankruptcy court...........meanwhile ........corporations (like Trump) use bankruptcy with ease.

The RMoney toady says that Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren "Vehemently opposed to American free enterprise, these extremists are fueled by burning left-wing populism and hostility toward capitalism. They demonize success by pitting the so-called “one percent” versus the “99 percent,” ..........again the RMoney toady espouses more pig shit.

Sanders and Warren are opposed to unregulated monopoly capitalism.....and.....special tax rates for people who sit in front of a bloomberg terminal & shuffle financial assets (Stocks, bonds, derivatives, fx, etc.) and get to pay a 15% tax rate as opposed to the top cardiologist M.D. in NY or LA earning $4 Million a year who's paying a 45% tax rate.

The RMoney toady would know exactly what I'm talking about since he saw the RMoney tax return below before I did.

Look at RMoney's tax return below that he released when he ran for President of the U.S.
Look at line 7
He earned NO wages.......but he made over $21,000,000 dollars.......and paid NO social security taxes

RMoney paid 14% taxes on his $21,000,000 earned by sitting in front of a Bloomberg terminal pushing buttons, talking on a phone, shuffling capital assets.

romney_taxes_page_one.jpg


This is the same fucking RMoney who when he was running for POTUS said that he wanted to CUT Social Security benefits and raise the eligibility age to collect benefits.

Anyhow, enough deconstruction and debunking of RMoney toady's pig shit article. He failed to mention that Hillary did not congratulate the VERIZON telecommunication workers union for winning their strike against VERIZON in a settlement that was 90% of what they demanded. VERIZON a very $$$$$$$$$ profitable company with a semi-monopoly of the most lucrative phone/internet/wireless market in the world...........who......for no other reason than more $$$$$$$$ money for the major shareholders , wanted to cut workers compensation, outsource their jobs (customer service reps) to call centers overseas, and shift workers locations on demand........for example......you show up for work in your usual NYC location and they suddenly tell you you will be working the next two weeks in Baltimore; fuck picking your kids up from school or any other plans you previously made; just go to Baltimore immediately.

Why didn't Hillary whose bogus campaign signs say "working for us" congratulate the workers.........well...she gives paid speeches for $$$$$$$$$$ to the very VERIZON executives who were trying to lower VERIZON workers income and lifestyle.

"Left-of-center" my ass, Hillary is in the same boat with RMoney.




tb-chumps.jpg


b.gif




feudalism.jpg

 
Last edited:
below originally posted http://www.bgol.us/forum/index.php?posts/16565834/

""Turn off the television corporate-media-of distraction (CBS, NBC/MSNBC, ABC, FAKE, CNN) all of whom have donated $$$$$$ money to Team Billary. They "own" her and they will do whatever they can get away with to elect her without being so blatant about it that they risk waking up the majority of somnolent very very low information American sheeple.........................

................Billary wants to campaign in non specifics, her campaign slogan signs say "fighting for us"; what a bold face crock of Bullshit. Billary is fighting for Trans-National Corporations and moneyed elites worldwide who have dropped $$$$$$$$$$$$ millions into the Billary Foundation which is a massive 501c3 slush fund.....""


Tonight June 6th 2016 the corporate-media-of distraction (CBS, NBC/MSNBC, ABC, FAKE, CNN) have declared Hillary the "Winner" of the Democratic Party primary process. She is now the "presumptive" Democratic Party nominee for POTUS. Despite her high negatives and vacuous campaign sloganeering the "financial elites", the Corporatists, who have poured $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ millions into the Clinton Foundation 501c3 slush fund and the Hillary POTUS campaign are going to ram Billary down America's throat; regardless of how unpalatable Billlary is to the American voter. There is very little enthusiasm for Billary......but.....in the "reality-based'" world there is even less for the megalomaniac and neo-facist Trump. The corporatist have made their "investment" in "their" candidate; they will all be waiting for their payoff if she gets to the White House.





Clinton Foundation donors include dozens of media organizations, individuals
By Josh Gerstein, Tarini Parti, Hadas Gold and Dylan Byers | 05/15/15


$1,000,000-$5,000,000

Carlos Slim
Chairman & CEO of Telmex, largest New York Times shareholder

James Murdoch
Chief Operating Officer of 21st Century Fox

Newsmax Media
Florida-based conservative media network

Thomson Reuters
Owner of the Reuters news service

$500,000-$1,000,000

Google

News Corporation Foundation
Philanthropic arm of former Fox News parent company

$250,000-$500,000

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Publisher

Richard Mellon Scaife
Owner of Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

$100,000-$250,000

Abigail Disney
Documentary filmmaker

Bloomberg Philanthropies

Howard Stringer
Former CBS, CBS News and Sony executive

Intermountain West Communications Company
Local television affiliate owner (formerly Sunbelt Communications)

$50,000-$100,000

Bloomberg L.P.

Discovery Communications Inc.

George Stephanopoulos
ABC News chief anchor and chief political correspondent

Mort Zuckerman
Owner of New York Daily News and U.S. News & World Report

Time Warner Inc.
Owner of CNN parent company Turner Broadcasting

$25,000-$50,000

AOL

HBO

Hollywood Foreign Press Association
Presenters of the Golden Globe Awards

Viacom

$10,000-$25,000

Knight Foundation
Non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting journalism

Public Radio International

Turner Broadcasting
Parent company of CNN

Twitter

$5,000-$10,000

Comcast
Parent copmany of NBCUniversal

NBC Universal
Parent company of NBC News, MSNBC and CNBC

Public Broadcasting Service

$1,000-$5,000

Robert Allbritton
Owner of POLITICO

$250-$1,000

AOL Huffington Post Media Group

Hearst Corporation

Judy Woodruff
PBS Newshour co-anchor and managing editor

The Washington Post Company

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media...ens-of-media-organizations-individuals-207228
 
COMPROMISE.

The parties now need to come together and work a reasonable COMPROMISE.
Neither side ever gets all it wants. Each side must be reasonable, understanding
what is at stake and understanding the pluses and minuses of their positions.

Get it on. Get it over. And get on with it.
 
Bernie Sanders deplores violence, but says

Democratic convention could get 'messy'



Bernie Sanders Rules Out Convention Floor Fights on Platform



2016-07-12t22-38-51-4z--1280x720.nbcnews-ux-1240-700.jpg



Bernie Sanders has decided against waging any floor fights at the Democratic National Convention on the party platform, according to an email obtained by NBC News.

Party rules empower Sanders, who endorsed Hillary Clinton Tuesday, to try to force votes at the Philadelphia convention on proposed planks that failed to muster the necessary votes at a Platform Committee meeting last weekend in Orlando.

But Sanders has decided against using the so-called minority report process, the senator's top policy aid informed allies Tuesday.


Related: Why the Bernie Sanders Revolution Lives On

"As a result of our success and the realization that further platform fights would be portrayed in the corporate media as obstructionist and divisive, the Senator made the very difficult decision not to file minority reports," policy director Warren Gunnels wrote in an email to activists who assisted the campaign's platform efforts.

"I know that many of you feel frustrated that we did not win every battle. I feel the same way," Gunnels added. "But all that means is that we must fight even harder to elect progressives at every level of government who will fight to advance our bold, progressive agenda."

The news was first reported by the Washington Post's Greg Sargent.

Related: Democrats Advance Most Liberal Platform Ever


Democrats worried about potentially raucous floor fights on wedge issues like an amendment opposing the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal. That plank was Sanders' top policy goal heading into the Orlando, but it was voted down out of respect for President Obama, who supports the TPP.

Gunnels said the full draft campaign is expected to be released Monday, after a lengthy technical approval process following the platform meeting.

Sanders' campaign is still gearing up for a fight on party nominating rules, with their top goal being the
elimination of superdelegates. The party's Rules Committee will meet just ahead of the convention.

"In terms of the convention, there are still more battles to be waged. We are now focusing our attention on changing the rules of the Democratic Party in order to make it easier for progressive challengers to win elections," Gunnels wrote.


SOURCE: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/201...-out-convention-floor-fights-platform-n608256



.
 
Back
Top